Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2013 Oct 3;3(13):4310–4325. doi: 10.1002/ece3.823

Satellite-derived estimations of spatial and seasonal variation in tropospheric carbon dioxide mass over China

Yuyue Xu 1, Changqing Ke 1, Juanle Wang 2, Jiulin Sun 2, Yang Liu 3, Warwick Harris 4, Cheng Kou 1
PMCID: PMC3856733  PMID: 24340174

Abstract

China has frequently been questioned about the data transparency and accuracy of its energy and emission statistics. Satellite-derived remote sensing data potentially provide a useful tool to study the variation in carbon dioxide (CO2) mass over areas of the earth's surface. In this study, Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) tropospheric CO2 concentration data and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis tropopause data were integrated to obtain estimates of tropospheric CO2 mass variations over the surface of China. These variations were mapped to show seasonal and spatial patterns with reference to China's provincial areas. The estimates of provincial tropospheric CO2 were related to statistical estimates of CO2 emissions for the provinces and considered with reference to provincial populations and gross regional products (GRP). Tropospheric CO2 masses for the Chinese provinces ranged from 53 ± 1 to 14,470 ± 63 million tonnes were greater for western than for eastern provinces and were primarily a function of provincial land area. Adjusted for land area troposphere CO2 mass was higher for eastern and southern provinces than for western and northern provinces. Tropospheric CO2 mass over China varied with season being highest in July and August and lowest in January and February. The average annual emission from provincial energy statistics of CO2 by China was estimated as 10.3% of the average mass of CO2 in the troposphere over China. The relationship between statistical emissions relative to tropospheric CO2 mass was higher than 20% for developed coastal provinces of China, with Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing having exceptionally high percentages. The percentages were generally lower than 10% for western inland provinces. Provincial estimates of emissions of CO2 were significantly positively related to provincial populations and gross regional products (GRP) when the values for the provincial municipalities Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing were excluded from the linear regressions. An increase in provincial GRP per person was related to a curvilinear increase in CO2 emissions, this being particularly marked for Beijing, Tianjin, and especially Shanghai. The absence of detection of specific elevation of CO2 mass in the troposphere above these municipalities may relate to the rapid mixing and dispersal of CO2 emissions or the proportion of the depth of the troposphere sensed by GOSAT.

Keywords: Carbon dioxide mass, China, emission estimates, satellite sensing, troposphere

Introduction

Carbon in the atmosphere exists in two main forms: carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). CO2 is the more important greenhouse gas of the two although CH4 produces a larger greenhouse effect per volume than CO2, and it exists in much lower concentrations and is shorter-lived than CO2 (Denman and Brasseur 2007). In the last two centuries, human activities have considerably altered the global carbon cycle, and most significantly, the mass of CO2 in the atmosphere. CO2 emissions in China increased by 17 million tonnes, from 1990 to 2003, an increase of 73%, making China the world's second largest carbon emitter after USA during this period (Zou et al. 2009; Guan et al. 2012). According to estimates by late 2006, China overtook USA as the greatest CO2 emitter in the world (Gregg et al. 2008; Gurney 2009). In 2010, near to 25% of global CO2 emissions from energy systems and industrial processes originated in China (Marland 2012). China, the most populous country of the world, is now well within the 6- to 19-tonnes/person range spanned by the major industrialized countries (Olivier et al. 2012). Carbon emissions from energy consumption in China increased more than 148% from 1997 to 2009, but the spatial pattern of high and low emission regions in the country did not change greatly (Chuai et al. 2012). China, because of its large population, diverse environments, and rapid rate of industrial development in recent years, is a critical location and geographical entity for research on global biological changes. Therefore, accurate estimation of spatial and temporal tropospheric CO2 mass change over China is of great importance in furthering our understanding of their effect on the carbon cycle and indispensable to scientific study or policy actions aiming at prediction and control of the climate change (Berezin et al. 2013).

In order to provide baseline references for the reduction in greenhouse gas from China, the statistics CO2 emissions from energy use and their impact on the environment are an important aspect to consider. Li et al. (2010) discussed the correlation between carbon emissions and the influencing factors in China from 1953 to 2006 and found that economic growth, population growth, and the evolution of industrial structure had acted to steadily increase China's carbon emissions. Further, Xie et al.(2011) and Zhao et al.(2011) found that foreign direct outward investment or direct investment can reduce carbon emission. Using the grey correlation model, Lin et al. (2007) examined the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic development and analyzed energy consumption in 37 departments of Taiwan. Their results indicated that economic growth was a major factor affecting carbon emissions.

Many studies based on statistical data have focused on China's CO2 emissions (Streets et al. 2001; Guan et al. 2008; Peters et al. 2012). However, China has frequently been questioned about the data transparency and accuracy of its energy and emission statistics (Guan et al. 2012). Compared with ground-based data statistical methods, satellite remote sensing now offers an effective way to continually, rapidly, and dynamically monitor large-scale CO2 distributions (Wiens et al. 2009). In recent years, space-borne remote sensing systems that provide large spatial and temporal coverage have been employed for the measurement of CO2. These systems include the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) (Bovensmann et al. 1999), Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES), the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) (Chahine et al. 2008; Xiong et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2012). Compared with these systems, the Japanese Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), launched on 23 January 2009, was the first satellite specifically dedicated to the measurement of greenhouse gases. The NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2), expected to be launched in 2015, will further improve the capacity to monitor greenhouse gases (Sakuma et al. 2010). Berezin et al. (2013) estimated multiannual changes of CO2 emissions in China using multiannual satellite measurements of tropospheric NO2 columns. There have been several studies of tropospheric CO2 concentration using GOSAT data (Gisi et al. 2012; Hammerling et al. 2012), but there remains the opportunity for further applications of the data for specific purposes, and in the case of our study, its application to the area of China.

As the first objective of this study, we estimated the tropospheric CO2 masses over provincial areas of China during 2010 based on data obtained from GOSAT. The spatial and temporal distributions of tropospheric CO2 mass over China were then mapped and discussed and the uncertainties of our results calculated. A further objective was to analyze relationships between our estimates of tropospheric CO2 mass and provincial statistics of CO2 emissions from energy use. The last objective was to examine relationships between these estimates and statistics with provincial human population numbers and gross regional product (GRP).

Data Sources and Methods

Carbon dioxide concentration data

Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite, launched successfully on 23 January 2009, was the first spacecraft to measure atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4 from space (Saitoh et al. 2009). GOSAT flies at an altitude of approximately 666 km, completes one revolution of the Earth in about 100 min, and returns to the same point in space in 3 days. The observation instrument on-board GOSAT, the Thermal And Near-infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO), is composed of two subunits: the Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) and the Cloud and Aerosol Imager (CAI) (Naoko et al. 2009).

The FTS and CAI data that the satellite collects are first received and processed at JAXA Tsukuba Space Center, Japan. Then, these data are transferred to GOSAT DHF via Tsukuba WAN, a high-speed wide area network in Tsukuba. GOSAT DHF gathers reference data, such as meteorological data, necessary for the higher-level data processing, from cooperating institutions on a regular basis (Watanabe et al. 2010). Among all spectra obtained with FTS, only those measured under no cloud interference within field of view (FOV) are selected for further processing. This screening uses the images from CAI. Based on the absorption characteristics of the gases, the selected spectra are analyzed, using a numerical calculation scheme called the retrieval method, to calculate column abundances of CO2 and CH4 (Yoshida et al. 2011; Berezin et al. 2013).

Changes in CO2 concentration are most obvious near the surface of the earth. The CO2 absorption bands near 1.6 μm and 2.0 μm are important as absorptions in these bands provide information on the near-surface concentrations. The absorption band around 14 μm is used for obtaining information mainly at altitudes above 2 km (Yoshida et al. 2011).

The FTS SWIR Level 3 data products are generated by interpolating, extrapolating, and smoothing the FTS SWIR Level 2 column-averaged mixing ratios of CO2 and CH4 on a monthly basis. A geostatistical calculation technique, called kriging, is applied. The values are gridded to 2.5-degree cells. Standard error stored in the Level 3 products is the square root of the estimated average of square errors, that is, between 1 and 2 parts per million (ppm) for most pixels. The FTS SWIR Level 3 XCO2 data are the total column through the atmosphere, extending above the troposphere. As the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is almost even in the vertical direction (Pearman and Garratt 1973; Woodwell et al. 1973), we used FTS SWIR L3 XCO2 data. The FTS SWIR Level 3 data extending from January to December 2010 were obtained from the GOSAT user interface gateway (https://data.gosat.nies.go.jp/GosatUserInterfaceGatway/guig/GuigPage/open.do).

Tropopause height data

The tropopause is marked by large changes in the thermal, dynamical, and chemical structure of the atmosphere (Dentener et al. 2003; Dlugokencky et al. 2003; Bousquet et al. 2006). Various studies have attempted to elucidate the key factors that determine the latitude–altitude distribution of the tropopause (Haynes et al. 2001; Santer et al. 2003). Initial investigations were based on radiosonde data. More recently, analyses from numerical weather prediction centers and “reanalysis” products (Randel et al. 2000) have provided insights into the climatological properties of the tropopause, its seasonal cycle, and its secular variations on interannual and decadal timescales. Much of this work has been summarized by Seidel et al. (2001). These studies have revealed that the tropopause responds to a variety of influences, such as variations in solar radiation, atmospheric angular momentum, stratospheric ozone, and explosive volcanic eruptions (Randel et al. 2000).

We employed data from reanalyzes jointly obtained by the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) (Kalnay et al. 1996). In the internal metadata for the file, it specifies that the least significant digit is one to the right of the decimal point or tenth's place. The NCEP and NCAR Reanalysis Project began in 1991 as an outgrowth of the National Meteorological Center (NMC) Climate Data Assimilation System (CDAS) project. The project examined the apparent “climate changes” that resulted from many changes introduced in the NMC operational global data assimilation system (GDAS) over the last decade to improve the forecasts. Detailed descriptions of these data sets are given elsewhere (Pawson and Fiorino 1998). Here, it is sufficient to note that the operational models had different horizontal (T62 for NCEP) and vertical (17 pressure levels) resolutions. These 17 levels are 10, 20, 30, 50, 70, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 850, 925, and 1000 hPa. The NCEP data extend from January 1948 through to December 2011. We did not use NCEP temperatures prior to January 1979 due to well-documented problems of homogeneities that exist around the transition to satellite data assimilation (Santer et al. 1999).

In order to calculate tropospheric CO2 mass over a specified area, the concentration of CO2 and volumes of the troposphere in which it is contained are required. The FTS SWIR Level 3 data provide monthly average CO2 concentrations (XCO2), but there are missing values in some pixels (Fig. 1). In this study, grid cells lacking data were filled using kriging interpolation of data from the surrounding cells. From NCEP and NCAR reanalysis, tropopause pressure data were obtained, and from these values, tropopause height was calculated. As the terrain-following coordinate is used in tropopause pressure data, the altitude is not considered when calculating the tropopause height. According to the ground area and tropopause height, the volume of the troposphere was calculated. Then, the CO2 mass for the defined volume of troposphere was calculated.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution over China of the mean tropospheric CO2 concentration (XCO2) in January 2010 derived from GOSAT FTS SWIR Level 3 data.

Calculation of XCO2 by kriging interpolation

The FTS SWIR Level 3 data indicating CO2 concentration required georeferencing from the geographic lookup table (GLT) in ENVI. This is the premier software solution used by GIS, image analysts, scientists, and researchers for processing and analyzing geospatial imagery. Each image has 144 rows and 72 columns. Thus, 144 rows and 72 columns are required when using the “georeference from GLT” tool. The image was then clipped by China's administrative boundary in ENVI. To obtain the volume of each pixel, all images were transformed to equal-area projection. The Albers equal-area projection system, with the original longitude 105°E, a double standard parallel of 0°N and 0°N, the Beijing 1954 geodetic datum and the Krasovsky ellipsoid, was used.

There were no data for parts of northern China (Fig. 1), so the pixels without data needed to be filled by interpolation. Interpolation methods commonly applied for estimating temperature or precipitation include distance weighting, polynomials interpolating, kriging, and splines (Nalder and Wein 1998). Distance weighting, which estimates the variable of interest by assigning more weight to closer points, is the simplest technique. Interpolating polynomials assigns a polynomial of an appropriate degree to the data points. Although higher degree polynomials provide a better fit, they may give totally unreasonable values between data points. Kriging, originally developed for mining ore estimation, assigns weights to minimize the variance and bias of the estimates. Spline methods, which are equivalent to kriging with a generalized covariance function, fit polynomials to a restricted set of points to provide a smooth, minimum curvature surface passing through the points(Lennon and Turner 1995). There is little evidence that any one method is optimal across a range of conditions; rather, it is important to determine the best method for each circumstance (Price et al., 2000). As kriging was used in processing FTS SWIR Level 2 data, the pixels that had no data in FTS SWIR Level 3 data were also interpolated by kriging in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution over China of monthly mean tropospheric CO2 concentrations (XCO2) during 2010 derived from FTS SWIR Level 3 data. Pixels without data were interpolated by kriging.

The 2010 seasonal cycle of XCO2 over China is clearly shown with the lowest concentrations in summer and the highest in winter (Fig. 2). However, the XCO2 for March and April 2010 deviate from the seasonal cycle by being particularly high. Possibly, this is because there were fewer pixels with values in FTS SWIR Level 3 data for these months. Thus, values interpolated by kriging for these months may present larger patches that are not very accurate representations.

Calculation of tropopause height

The monthly mean tropopause was saved in the netCDF format. The Climate Data Operators (CDO) software is a collection of many operators for the standard processing of climate and numerical weather prediction (NWP) model outputs. The operators include simple statistical and arithmetic functions, data selection and subsampling tools, and spatial interpolation. The monthly mean troposphere pressures between January and December 2011 were selected from “pres.tropp.mon.mean.nc” by CDO 1.5.1. The monthly mean tropopause height was obtained by equation (1) (Filipiak 1999):

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m1.jpg (1)

where p is the monthly mean troposphere pressure and h is the monthly mean tropopause height, p0 = 1000 hPa, H = 16 km. Distributions over China of mean tropopause heights for the months of 2010 are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Monthly mean tropopause heights over China during 2010 derived from NCEP and NCAR reanalysis data.

Monthly mean tropopause height showed a decreasing trend with increased latitude, varying between 15 km and 17 km in southern China, and between 8 km and 11 km in the north. Monthly mean tropopause height also varied with season being highest in summer and lowest in winter. Thus for most of China, the monthly mean tropopause height was higher than 15 km in July and was about 12 km in January.

Calculation of the tropospheric CO2 mass over China

In order to ensure that the location and size of tropopause height and XCO2 estimates were the same, the monthly mean tropopause image and XCO2 image were resampled to 10 km pixel size, and then georeferenced in ArcGIS to make the two datasets align properly. The CO2 mass in the troposphere above a defined land area is equal to the volume of troposphere above the land area multiplied by the concentration of CO2 in that volume. Based on the area of each pixel and the tropopause height, the volume and mass of CO2 can be calculated. Details of the calculation processes are as follows:

The cell size of the raster data is 10 km, and therefore, the area of each pixel is 100 km2. The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is measured in ppm. The ppm is adjusted to mg/m3 using equation (2):

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m2.jpg (2)

where M is the molecular weight with the molecular weight of CO2 equal to 44 and 22.4 is molar volume of the standard gas, so that

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m3.jpg (3)

CO2 mass is calculated by equation (4):

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m4.jpg (4)

where m is the CO2 mass in the defined volume of troposphere, ρ is the concentration of CO2, s is the area of each pixel and h is the tropopause height. Using the raster calculator in ArcGIS,

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m5.jpg (5)

Gg, the abbreviation for gigagram is equal to 106 kg.

The uncertainties were calculated as follows:

graphic file with name ece30003-4310-m6.jpg (6)

where ρ is the concentration of CO2, h is the tropopause height, Inline graphic is the standard deviation of CO2 concentration, and Inline graphic is the standard deviation of tropopause height.

Comparison of tropospheric CO2 mass, ground emission data, population, and gross regional products

Ground estimates of CO2 emissions for the provinces based on the 2010 provincial energy statistics made by (Guan et al. 2012) are presented in Table 3 together with our estimates of tropospheric CO2 mass derived from satellite sensing. Populations and the gross regional products (GRP) of the provinces are also given in Table 3. Relationships between values in this Table were plotted, and their significance examined by regression analysis.

Table 3.

2010 provincial gross regional products (GRP), populations, CO2 emissions based on statistical data per square kilometer (Guan et al. 2012), remotely sensed tropospheric CO2 mass per square kilometer, and the percentage proportion of tropospheric CO2 provided by current annual emissions. Provinces are listed in the order from highest to lowest% of current annual emission to remotely sensed tropospheric CO2 mass per unit area

Province Population (10 thousand) Gross Regional Product (100 million yuan) CO2 emissions based on 2010 provincial energy statistics (million tonnes) Remotely Sensed tropospheric CO2 mass (million tonnes) CO2 emissions based on 2010 provincial energy statistics per square kilometer (tonnes/km2) Remotely Sensed tropospheric CO2 per square kilometer (tonnes/km2) Percentage of CO2 emissions to tropospheric CO2 mass (%)
Shanghai 2301.91 17165.98 211.26 53.14 33501.43 10844.35 308.93
Tianjin 1293.82 9224.46 134.36 98.95 11576.77 8679.39 133.38
Beijing 1961.24 14113.60 103.05 134.46 6295.05 8403.63 74.91
Shandong 9579.31 39169.92 769.12 1345.72 5013.10 9280.83 54.02
Jiangsu 7865.99 41425.48 555.56 1045.88 5503.21 10334.78 53.25
Hebei 7185.42 20394.26 663.18 1600.39 3545.56 8581.18 41.32
Liaoning 4374.63 18457.30 456.38 1159.55 3141.81 8097.42 38.80
Henan 9402.36 23092.36 490.92 1691.42 2964.49 10122.20 29.29
Zhejiang 5442.69 27722.31 337.48 1124.33 3307.17 11391.39 29.03
Shanxi 3571.21 9200.86 403.45 1427.17 2579.92 9142.66 28.22
Guangdong 10430.31 46013.06 443.59 2077.04 2504.97 11916.47 21.02
Ningxia 630.14 1689.65 91.11 466.25 1757.08 9381.33 18.73
Anhui 5950.05 12359.33 247.75 1495.96 1764.64 10654.99 16.56
Hubei 5723.77 15967.61 319.61 2075.15 1716.83 11138.75 15.41
Jilin 2746.23 8667.58 198.36 1501.27 1041.04 7794.76 13.36
Chongqing 2884.62 7925.58 124.86 937.03 1512.74 11497.30 13.16
Fujian 3689.42 14737.12 187.30 1409.13 1536.58 11782.02 13.04
Shaanxi 3732.74 10123.48 202.27 2018.34 982.37 9831.17 9.99
Hunan 6568.37 16037.96 243.02 2448.11 1144.07 11764.10 9.73
Guizhou 3474.65 4602.16 182.36 2087.11 1034.65 11878.83 8.71
Jiangxi 4456.75 9451.26 134.84 1961.70 805.97 11711.64 6.88
Heilongjiang 3831.22 10368.60 217.38 3171.16 482.99 7300.09 6.62
Hainan 867.15 2064.50 25.82 378.03 759.88 11925.11 6.37
Guangxi 4602.66 9569.85 155.79 2817.20 657.87 11967.71 5.50
Inner Mongolia 2470.63 11672.00 474.35 8881.04 414.22 7990.86 5.18
Sichuan 8041.82 17185.48 270.10 5523.28 557.70 11376.48 4.90
Yunnan 4596.62 7224.18 183.64 4534.91 478.26 11956.00 4.00
Gansu 2557.53 4120.75 123.44 3833.85 304.82 9492.08 3.21
Xinjiang 2181.33 5437.47 166.75 14470.70 102.10 9057.21 1.13
Qinghai 562.67 1350.43 28.88 7229.56 40.36 10028.52 0.40
Total 8145.98 78997.82 10.31

Results and Discussion

Spatial variation in tropospheric CO2 mass

The monthly mean tropospheric CO2 mass calculated by equation (5) (Fig. 4) varied from 600 and 1250 Gg/100 km2 for different parts of China. Tropospheric CO2 mass was higher in southern than in northern China and higher in summer than in winter.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Distribution of monthly mean tropospheric CO2 mass per pixel (Gg/100 km2) over China during 2010 calculated from the volume of the troposphere and the concentration of CO2.

The spatial variation in annual mean tropospheric CO2 mass over China in 2010 obtained by the raster calculator in ArcGIS was calculated. From this calculation, using the zonal statistical function in ArcGIS, we calculated the annual mean tropospheric CO2 mass for each of the provincial areas of China (Table 1), and these masses are plotted for their geographical location on the map of China (Fig. 5A).

Table 1.

The 2010 annual mean tropospheric CO2 masses and standard errors for the provincial areas of China

Province Tropospheric CO2 mass (million tonnes)
Xinjiang 14,471 ± 63
Tibet 13,488 ± 67
Inner Mongolia 8881 ± 51
Qinghai 7230 ± 33
Sichuan 5523 ± 32
Yunnan 4535 ± 25
Gansu 3834 ± 21
Heilongjiang 3171 ± 20
Guangxi 2817 ± 16
Hunan 2448 ± 17
Guizhou 2087 ± 15
Guangdong 2077 ± 11
Hubei 2075 ± 14
Shaanxi 2018 ± 13
Jiangxi 1962 ± 13
Henan 1691 ± 11
Hebei 1600 ± 11
Jilin 1501 ± 9
Anhui 1496 ± 12
Shanxi 1427 ± 9
Fujian 1409 ± 8
Shandong 1346 ± 10
Liaoning 1160 ± 7
Zhejiang 1124 ± 7
Jiangsu 1046 ± 7
Chongqing 937 ± 6
Ningxia 466 ± 3
Taiwan 403 ± 2
Hainan 378 ± 1
Beijing 134 ± 1
Tianjin 99 ± 1
Shanghai 53 ± 1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Annual mean tropospheric CO2 mass (MT, million tonnes) for each province of China and (B) annual mean tropospheric CO2 mass per province area (Gg/km2) in 2010.

Annual mean tropospheric CO2 masses for the provinces ranged from 53 ± 1 million tonnes (1 million tonnes = 109 kg) to 14,470 ± 63 million tonnes. The five highest values were for Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, and Sichuan. The five lowest values were for the cities of Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tianjin, Beijing, and Hainan Island, all of which have small areas (Table 1, Fig. 5A). Thus, the obvious feature of provincial tropospheric CO2 masses is that their differences are primarily determined by provincial area. Consequently, tropospheric CO2 mass adjusted for provincial area has a different spatial pattern than the mean tropospheric CO2 masses of the provinces and is generally higher for eastern than for western provinces and higher for southern than for northern provinces (Fig. 5B). The north to south pattern is most likely a result of the increase in the height of the tropopause from north to south (Fig. 3), providing greater tropospheric volume to contain more CO2 mass (Fig. 4). The east to west pattern is not as readily explained, but a possibility is that the higher altitudes of the western provinces reduce the volume of troposphere containing CO2 mass.

Temporal changes of monthly mean tropospheric CO2 mass

Monthly values of provincial tropospheric CO2 mass per provincial area between January and December 2010 were summarized by the function of “Zonal Statistics as a Table” in ArcGIS and are presented in Table 2 and plotted in Figure 6.

Table 2.

2010 monthly mean tropospheric CO2 masses / area and standard errors for the provinces of China

Province January February March April May June July August September October November December
Guangxi 12.15 ± 0.06 12.32 ± 0.06 12.30 ± 0.12 12.07 ± 0.05 12.14 ± 0.05 11.90 ± 0.10 11.60 ± 0.05 11.65 ± 0.06 11.58 ± 0.09 11.72 ± 0.06 12.00 ± 0.08 12.19 ± 0.08
Hong Kong 12.12 ± 0.06 12.39 ± 0.04 12.30 ± 0.03 12.08 ± 0.04 12.22 ± 0.05 11.84 ± 0.10 11.45 ± 0.08 11.47 ± 0.03 11.45 ± 0.09 11.72 ± 0.06 11.96 ± 0.08 12.15 ± 0.07
Guangdong 12.11 ± 0.07 12.35 ± 0.03 12.29 ± 0.07 12.03 ± 0.04 12.20 ± 0.04 11.84 ± 0.11 11.42 ± 0.12 11.48 ± 0.05 11.48 ± 0.10 11.70 ± 0.06 11.96 ± 0.10 12.13 ± 0.10
Hainan 12.08 ± 0.04 12.41 ± 0.04 12.28 ± 0.03 12.16 ± 0.03 12.22 ± 0.05 11.82 ± 0.10 11.50 ± 0.04 11.45 ± 0.03 11.43 ± 0.10 11.72 ± 0.05 11.93 ± 0.03 12.10 ± 0.04
Yunnan 12.07 ± 0.10 12.22 ± 0.06 12.16 ± 0.15 12.14 ± 0.05 12.02 ± 0.07 11.87 ± 0.07 11.68 ± 0.05 11.68 ± 0.05 11.66 ± 0.06 11.81 ± 0.09 11.97 ± 0.06 12.18 ± 0.04
Taiwan 12.05 ± 0.06 12.27 ± 0.03 12.22 ± 0.06 12.11 ± 0.04 12.13 ± 0.03 11.67 ± 0.23 11.16 ± 0.13 11.34 ± 0.07 11.36 ± 0.09 11.66 ± 0.06 11.87 ± 0.05 12.02 ± 0.11
Guizhou 11.98 ± 0.12 12.06 ± 0.06 12.08 ± 0.19 11.92 ± 0.05 11.86 ± 0.07 11.85 ± 0.10 11.71 ± 0.05 11.76 ± 0.10 11.63 ± 0.09 11.64 ± 0.07 11.93 ± 0.09 12.12 ± 0.05
Fujian 11.88 ± 0.07 12.15 ± 0.05 12.17 ± 0.05 11.83 ± 0.03 11.99 ± 0.03 11.77 ± 0.23 11.29 ± 0.13 11.49 ± 0.06 11.46 ± 0.10 11.59 ± 0.08 11.81 ± 0.05 11.94 ± 0.10
Hunan 11.86 ± 0.08 11.87 ± 0.06 12.03 ± 0.12 11.72 ± 0.05 11.79 ± 0.06 11.82 ± 0.10 11.53 ± 0.10 11.66 ± 0.09 11.55 ± 0.09 11.52 ± 0.07 11.80 ± 0.06 12.02 ± 0.08
Jiangxi 11.77 ± 0.08 11.93 ± 0.07 12.05 ± 0.05 11.68 ± 0.05 11.79 ± 0.05 11.80 ± 0.17 11.39 ± 0.13 11.59 ± 0.06 11.51 ± 0.10 11.53 ± 0.06 11.71 ± 0.05 11.79 ± 0.08
Chongqing 11.37 ± 0.08 11.00 ± 0.04 11.11 ± 0.10 11.35 ± 0.03 11.66 ± 0.11 11.77 ± 0.10 11.70 ± 0.05 11.74 ± 0.10 11.55 ± 0.09 11.47 ± 0.06 11.56 ± 0.09 11.70 ± 0.06
Zhejiang 11.02 ± 0.05 11.44 ± 0.06 11.66 ± 0.05 11.37 ± 0.07 11.60 ± 0.07 11.59 ± 0.23 11.29 ± 0.13 11.59 ± 0.06 11.45 ± 0.09 11.45 ± 0.08 11.25 ± 0.05 10.99 ± 0.09
Sichuan 10.86 ± 0.08 10.39 ± 0.05 10.51 ± 0.08 11.15 ± 0.03 11.74 ± 0.10 11.79 ± 0.07 11.83 ± 0.06 11.79 ± 0.06 11.62 ± 0.06 11.62 ± 0.05 11.67 ± 0.06 11.56 ± 0.08
Hubei 10.58 ± 0.05 10.28 ± 0.06 10.46 ± 0.05 10.80 ± 0.07 11.46 ± 0.08 11.65 ± 0.11 11.57 ± 0.10 11.71 ± 0.10 11.52 ± 0.09 11.27 ± 0.07 11.10 ± 0.06 11.26 ± 0.06
Tibet 10.14 ± 0.08 9.76 ± 0.05 10.57 ± 0.07 11.13 ± 0.04 11.62 ± 0.03 12.01 ± 0.05 11.96 ± 0.04 12.02 ± 0.08 11.80 ± 0.09 11.70 ± 0.05 11.93 ± 0.07 11.15 ± 0.06
Shanghai 9.88 ± 0.04 10.12 ± 0.03 10.46 ± 0.05 10.74 ± 0.08 11.19 ± 0.07 11.27 ± 0.22 11.27 ± 0.13 11.59 ± 0.06 11.43 ± 0.08 11.26 ± 0.08 10.68 ± 0.04 10.24 ± 0.06
Anhui 9.73 ± 0.04 9.56 ± 0.04 9.90 ± 0.04 10.23 ± 0.07 11.02 ± 0.07 11.36 ± 0.22 11.42 ± 0.13 11.67 ± 0.08 11.47 ± 0.09 11.05 ± 0.07 10.31 ± 0.06 10.14 ± 0.06
Jiangsu 9.24 ± 0.04 9.07 ± 0.03 9.30 ± 0.04 9.80 ± 0.07 10.78 ± 0.07 11.07 ± 0.22 11.34 ± 0.13 11.62 ± 0.06 11.42 ± 0.08 10.93 ± 0.08 10.03 ± 0.11 9.43 ± 0.06
Henan 8.77 ± 0.06 8.48 ± 0.04 8.64 ± 0.04 9.26 ± 0.06 10.69 ± 0.07 11.17 ± 0.10 11.50 ± 0.13 11.65 ± 0.10 11.43 ± 0.08 10.90 ± 0.07 9.50 ± 0.05 9.48 ± 0.03
Qinghai 8.41 ± 0.05 8.13 ± 0.04 8.61 ± 0.03 8.83 ± 0.03 10.12 ± 0.04 11.34 ± 0.04 11.89 ± 0.05 11.79 ± 0.08 11.53 ± 0.05 10.99 ± 0.05 9.78 ± 0.05 8.92 ± 0.04
Shaanxi 8.34 ± 0.05 8.04 ± 0.06 8.28 ± 0.02 8.76 ± 0.02 10.48 ± 0.09 11.05 ± 0.09 11.58 ± 0.05 11.57 ± 0.10 11.36 ± 0.07 10.70 ± 0.08 8.99 ± 0.06 8.82 ± 0.04
Gansu 7.94 ± 0.05 7.92 ± 0.04 8.20 ± 0.03 8.46 ± 0.02 9.52 ± 0.07 10.76 ± 0.06 11.67 ± 0.10 11.57 ± 0.08 11.00 ± 0.05 9.99 ± 0.05 8.61 ± 0.04 8.27 ± 0.03
Xinjiang 7.81 ± 0.03 7.92 ± 0.03 8.25 ± 0.03 8.38 ± 0.04 8.50 ± 0.05 9.56 ± 0.07 10.86 ± 0.04 11.27 ± 0.05 10.42 ± 0.05 9.03 ± 0.03 8.84 ± 0.04 7.85 ± 0.05
Shandong 7.77 ± 0.08 7.72 ± 0.02 7.96 ± 0.03 8.29 ± 0.06 9.63 ± 0.06 10.04 ± 0.20 11.25 ± 0.13 11.52 ± 0.07 11.26 ± 0.08 9.96 ± 0.07 8.20 ± 0.07 7.78 ± 0.02
Ningxia 7.67 ± 0.08 7.72 ± 0.06 8.05 ± 0.01 8.25 ± 0.02 9.58 ± 0.09 10.72 ± 0.09 11.60 ± 0.05 11.48 ± 0.11 11.21 ± 0.06 10.10 ± 0.05 8.18 ± 0.04 8.00 ± 0.03
Shanxi 7.62 ± 0.04 7.73 ± 0.07 7.93 ± 0.04 8.18 ± 0.05 9.50 ± 0.06 10.02 ± 0.06 11.34 ± 0.011 11.22 ± 0.06 11.06 ± 0.05 9.56 ± 0.07 7.92 ± 0.03 7.63 ± 0.05
Tianjin 7.25 ± 0.09 7.57 ± 0.03 7.63 ± 0.02 7.67 ± 0.05 8.96 ± 0.06 8.97 ± 0.18 11.06 ± 0.13 11.13 ± 0.02 10.88 ± 0.06 8.65 ± 0.13 7.35 ± 0.03 7.03 ± 0.02
Hebei 7.21 ± 0.07 7.56 ± 0.02 7.59 ± 0.03 7.60 ± 0.05 8.69 ± 0.06 9.03 ± 0.14 10.88 ± 0.12 10.94 ± 0.03 10.56 ± 0.05 8.49 ± 0.07 7.38 ± 0.05 7.04 ± 0.02
Beijing 7.10 ± 0.09 7.53 ± 0.02 7.51 ± 0.02 7.42 ± 0.05 8.43 ± 0.05 8.80 ± 0.17 10.77 ± 0.12 10.74 ± 0.02 10.30 ± 0.05 8.09 ± 0.09 7.25 ± 0.04 6.90 ± 0.01
Inner Mongolia 6.88 ± 0.03 7.27 ± 0.04 7.09 ± 0.02 7.07 ± 0.02 7.97 ± 0.07 8.91 ± 0.11 9.97 ± 0.06 9.81 ± 0.04 9.23 ± 0.04 7.82 ± 0.05 7.18 ± 0.03 6.70 ± 0.03
Liaoning 6.75 ± 0.02 7.27 ± 0.04 7.23 ± 0.03 7.05 ± 0.03 7.95 ± 0.13 8.60 ± 0.17 10.02 ± 0.11 11.05 ± 0.02 10.00 ± 0.07 7.82 ± 0.07 6.96 ± 0.03 6.47 ± 0.02
Jilin 6.44 ± 0.03 6.95 ± 0.04 6.87 ± 0.03 6.68 ± 0.01 7.74 ± 0.11 8.63 ± 0.14 9.53 ± 0.07 10.68 ± 0.05 9.42 ± 0.05 7.50 ± 0.06 6.84 ± 0.03 6.24 ± 0.02
Heilongjiang 6.32 ± 0.03 6.45 ± 0.03 6.28 ± 0.02 6.31 ± 0.01 7.61 ± 0.05 8.49 ± 0.12 8.90 ± 0.08 9.34 ± 0.07 8.31 ± 0.06 7.02 ± 0.06 6.57 ± 0.02 6.02 ± 0.02

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Temporal variation in monthly mean tropospheric CO2 mass/area for the provinces of China in 2010.

The temporal monthly variation in tropospheric CO2 mass per provincial area over China in 2010 ranged from 6 to 13 Gg/km2. For most provinces (Fig. 6C–F), the tropospheric CO2 mass per square kilometers varied in an annual cycle being highest in July and August and lowest in January and February. Monthly changes of tropospheric CO2 mass for Guangxi, Hong Kong, Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan, Taiwan, Guizhou, and Fujian were between 11 and 12.5 Gg/km2 (Fig. 6A,B).

Tropopause height, which is highest in summer and lowest in winter, a pattern that is stronger as latitude increases (Fig. 3), appears to be the most important factor affecting seasonal variation in tropospheric CO2 mass per area for China. Other factors may contribute to this pattern including seasonal variation in carbon fixation by photosynthesis emissions from decomposition of vegetation residues, seasonal variation in burning carbon for domestic heating, and industrial emissions.

Comparison of CO2 emission estimates with tropospheric CO2 mass estimates

Guan et al. (2012) obtained publicly available energy statistics from Chinese authorities and followed the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission accounting approach to compile an emission inventory for every Chinese province. Our estimations of the tropospheric CO2 mass and the emission estimates based on the 2010 provincial energy statistics made by Guan et al. (2012) are presented in Table 3 and are plotted with reference to each other in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Scatter plot of provincial CO2 emissions per unit area based on 2010 provincial energy statistics against remotely sensed tropospheric CO2 mass per unit area for the provinces of China. Red, blue, and green circles denote that these provinces located in the south, north, and centre of China, respectively. (A) Provinces excluding Shanghai, Beijing, and Tianjin. (B) Shanghai, Beijing, and Tianjin.

Comparison of the tropospheric CO2 mass and emission estimates (Fig. 7A) indicates that they are not significantly related (r = 0.24). The main pattern indicated is for troposphere CO2 mass to decrease from southern to northern provinces (y axis).

The mean percentage of total annual process CO2 emissions averaged for all the provinces of China relative to the total tropospheric CO2 mass based on our remote sensing data estimates is 10.3% (Table 3). This percentage differs widely between provinces varying from 308.9% for Shanghai to 0.40% for Qinghai. The percentage of emissions relative to the estimated tropospheric CO2 mass over the area of provinces is higher than 20% for Shanghai, Tianjin, Beijing, Shandong, Jiangsu, Hebei, Liaoning, Zhejiang, Henan, Shanxi, and Guangdong. The three provincial-level municipalities, Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, with exceptionally high proportions of emissions compared with the tropospheric CO2 mass above their areas, have developed economies intensified on much smaller areas leading to higher CO2 emissions per unit area. Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, and Guangdong are more developed provinces on the eastern coast of China, and their CO2 emissions are higher than for the remaining provinces, Qinghai, Xinjiang, Gansu, Yunnan, Sichuan, Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Heilongjiang, Hainan, Jiangxi, and Guizhou. For these provinces, the proportion of CO2 emission relative to tropospheric CO2 mass is less than 10%. They are located in west, north, and central China and do not have well-developed industrial economies, and consequently, their unit area CO2 emissions are lower.

Relationships of population and GRP with CO2 emissions

To consider effects of economic development and population numbers on CO2 emissions, we compared CO2 emissions based on 2010 provincial energy statistics with GRP and population (Table 3). The GRP data were obtained from 3 to 2 gross regional products (2010) in 2011 China Statistical Yearbook for Regional Economy, and the population data were obtained from 3 to 7 region's population and sex ratio in 2011 China Statistical Yearbook. As we had no GRP data for Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, they are not included in the analyses.

The relationship between provincial population numbers and GRP is highly significant (r = 0.82, P = 0.03) (Fig. 8). The regression separates provinces with relatively high GRP for their populations, which are above the regression line, from those with low GRP for their populations, which are below the line. The relationships between provincial tropospheric CO2 mass and populations and GRP were not significant (Fig. 9A,B). Considered separately, the relationships between provincial populations and GRP and CO2 emissions were not significant, but removal of the three provincial municipalities, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing, indicated positive relationships between provincial populations and GRP and CO2 emissions (Fig. 9C,D). When considered as provincial GRP/person, the regression is significant as a quadratic relationship (Fig. 10). In particular, this relationship indicates the very high level of CO2 emissions from Shanghai, and to a lesser extent by Tianjin and Beijing, compared with the other provinces. It is suggested that the high CO2 emissions from these municipalities are rapidly dispersed into the wider volume of the troposphere over China so as to be not detected as variations in CO2 mass in the volumes of troposphere above them.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Relationship between Chinese provincial populations and provincial GRP.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

(A) Relationship between provincial unit area troposphere CO2 mass and population numbers of the provinces of China. (B) Relationship between provincial unit area unit area troposphere CO2 mass and GRP for the provinces of China. (C) Relationship between unit area CO2 emissions and population numbers of the provinces of China. (D) Relationship between provincial unit area CO2 emissions and GRP for the provinces of China. The three provincial municipalities, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Beijing, are not included in the four figures.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Relationship between CO2 emissions and GRP per person for the provinces of China.

Conclusions

Our determinations of tropospheric CO2 mass for the provincial areas of China have not shown relationships between human population density and economic activity in the way indicated with ground-based estimates of CO2 emissions. There are several possible explanations for this. First, CO2 emissions are quickly mixed and dispersed in the atmosphere (Foucher et al. 2011). Atmospheric circulation transports CO2 from surface to very broad volumes of troposphere both laterally and vertically (Keppel-Aleks et al. 2011). Second, an important consideration is which layers of the atmosphere were sensed for CO2 concentration by GOSAT. If lower altitude layers were specifically sensed, then it is more likely that they would show a relationship to ground emissions. However, the FTS SWIR Level 3 data that were available for our calculations of CO2 mass were column-averaged mixing ratios of CO2 over the broader depth of the atmosphere and not just the troposphere. Third, the adjustment for troposphere height may incorrectly distort the estimates of CO2 mass. Altitude of the land surface may also have a significant effect on troposphere CO2 mass.

In addition to the anthropogenic emissions into the troposphere that we have specifically considered, the column CO2 mass in the bulk atmosphere has many other sources. Besides the broad spatial patterns of tropospheric CO2 mass related to seasonal cycles and latitude (Fig. 3), there are indications of longitudinal variations that may indicate other influences on tropospheric CO2 mass, that is, distance from coastal-oceanic influences. Monitoring for several years is required to confirm the existence of such effects. Consequently, we plan to further quantify variations of spatial and temporal variations of tropospheric CO2 mass over China in order to obtain better understanding of the causes and mechanisms of these variations.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Program for National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41301447, 41371391), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (No. BK20130568), the National Key Technology Research and Development (No. 2012BAH28B02), the Public Welfare Special Program, the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (Grant No. 201109075), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. We would like to thank Jiali Luo, Lishan Ran, and Qiuhao Huang for their comments and suggestions. NCEP Reanalysis data were provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. Berezin EV, Konovalov IB, Ciais P, Richter A, Tao S, Janssens-Maenhout G, et al. Multiannual changes of CO2 emissions in China: indirect estimates derived from satellite measurements of tropospheric NO2 columns. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013;13:255–309. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bousquet P, Ciais P, Miller JB, Dlugokencky EJ, Hauglustaine DA, Prigent C, et al. Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature. 2006;443:439–443. doi: 10.1038/nature05132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bovensmann H, Burrows JP, Buchwitz M, Frerick J, Noël S, Rozanov VV, et al. SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes. J. Atmos. Sci. 1999;56:127–150. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chahine MT, Chen L, Dimotakis P, Jiang X, Li QB, Olsen ET, et al. Satellite remote sounding of mid-tropospheric CO2. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008;35:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chuai XW, Huang XJ, Wang WJ, Wen JQ, Chen Q, Peng JW. Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emissions from energy consumption in China. J. Geog. Sci. 2012;22:630–642. [Google Scholar]
  6. Denman K, Brasseur G. The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, U.K, and New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dentener F, Peters W, Krol M, Bergamaschi M, van Weele P, Lelieveld J. Interannual variability and trend of CH4 lifetime as a measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2003;108:4442. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dlugokencky EJ, Houweling S, Bruhwiler L, Masarie KA, Lang PM, Miller JB, et al. Atmospheric methane levels off: Temporary pause or a new steady-state? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003;30:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Filipiak M. EOS MLS retrieved geophysical parameter precision estimates. Edinburgh University Meteorology Department Technical Report (also Jet Propulsion Laboratory Document D-16160). Version 1: 15. UK: University of Edinburgh; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  10. Foucher PY, Chédin A, Armante R, Boone C, Crevoisier C, Bernath P. Carbon dioxide atmospheric vertical profiles retrieved from space observation using ACE-FTS solar occultation instrument. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011;11:2455–2470. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gisi M, Hase F, Dohe S, Blumenstock T, Simon A, Keens A. XCO2-measurements with a tabletop FTS using solar absorption spectroscopy. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2012;5:2969–2980. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gregg JS, Andres RJ, Marland G. China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2008;35:L08806. [Google Scholar]
  13. Guan D, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Global Environment. Change. 2008;18:626–634. [Google Scholar]
  14. Guan D, Liu Z, Geng Y, Lindner S, Hubacek K. The gigatonne gap in China's carbon dioxide inventories. Nat. Climat. Change. 2012;2:672–675. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gurney KR. Global change: China at the carbon crossroads. Nature. 2009;458:977–979. doi: 10.1038/458977a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammerling DM, Michalak AM, Kawa SR. Mapping of CO2 at high spatiotemporal resolution using satellite observations: global distributions from OCO-2. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2012;117:D06306. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haynes P, Scinocca J, Greenslade M. Formation and maintenance of the extratropical tropopause by baroclinic eddies. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001;28:4179–4182. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1996;77:437–471. [Google Scholar]
  19. Keppel-Aleks G, Wennberg PO, Schneider T. Sources of variations in total column carbon dioxide. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011;11:3581–3593. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lennon JJ, Turner JRG. Predicting the spatial-distribution of climate – temperature in Great-Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 1995;64:370–392. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li J, Cheng X, Zhang L. Analysis of mechanisms of carbon emissions growth in China. Res. Sci. 2010;32:2059–2065. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin SJ, Lu IJ, Lewis C. Grey relation performance correlations among economics, energy use and carbon dioxide emission in Taiwan. Energy Policy. 2007;35:1948–1955. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Marland G. Emissions accounting: China's uncertain CO2 emissions. Nat. Climat. Change. 2012;2:645–646. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nalder IA, Wein RW. Spatial interpolation of climatic Normals: test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1998;92:211–225. [Google Scholar]
  25. Naoko S, Ryoichi I, Yoshifumi O, Yosuke N. CO2 retrieval algorithm for the thermal infrared spectra of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite: potential of retrieving CO2 vertical profile from high-resolution FTS sensor. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2009;D17:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olivier JGJ, Janssens-Maenhout G, Peters JAHW. Trends in global CO2 emissions 2012 report. 2012. 2012PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) of the European Commission' s Joint Research Centre(JRC)
  27. Pawson S, Fiorino M. A comparison of reanalyses in the tropical stratosphere. Part 1: thermal structure and the annual cycle. Clim. Dyn. 1998;14:631–644. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pearman GI, Garratt JR. Space and time variations of tropospheric carbon dioxide in the southern hemisphere. Tellus. 1973;25:309–311. [Google Scholar]
  29. Peters GP, Marland G, Boden C, Le Quere T, Canadell JG, Raupach MR. Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008–2009 global financial crisis. Nat. Climat. Change. 2012;2:2–4. [Google Scholar]
  30. Price DT, McKenney DW, Nalder IA, Hutchinson MF, Kesteven JL. A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2000;101:81–94. [Google Scholar]
  31. Randel WJ, Wu F, Gaffen DJ. Interannual variability of the tropical tropopause derived from radiosonde data and NCEP reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2000;105:15509–15523. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saitoh N, Imasu R, Ota Y, Niwa Y. CO2 retrieval algorithm for the thermal infrared spectra of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite: Potential of retrieving CO2 vertical profile from high-resolution FTS sensor. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2009;114:D17305. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sakuma F, Bruegge CJ, Rider D, Brown D, Geier S, Kawakami S, et al. OCO/GOSAT Preflight cross-calibration experiment. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2010;48:585–599. [Google Scholar]
  34. Santer BD, Hnilo JJ, Wigley TML, Boyle JS, Doutriaux C, Fiorino M, et al. Uncertainties in observationally based estimates of temperature change in the free atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 1999;104:6305–6333. [Google Scholar]
  35. Santer BD, Sausen R, Wigley TML, Boyle JS, AchutaRao K, Doutriaux C, et al. Behavior of tropopause height and atmospheric temperature in models, reanalyses, and observations: decadal changes. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2003;108:4002. [Google Scholar]
  36. Seidel DJ, Ross RJ, Angell JK, Reid GC. Climatological characteristics of the tropical tropopause as revealed by radiosondes. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2001;106:7857–7878. [Google Scholar]
  37. Streets DG, Jiang K, Hu X, Sinton JE, Zhang X-Q, Xu D, et al. Recent reductions in China's greenhouse gas emissions. Science. 2001;294:1835–1837. doi: 10.1126/science.1065226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Watanabe H, Yuki A, Hayashi K, Kawazoe F, Kikuchi N, Takahashi F, et al. GOSAT higher level product status more than 1.5 years after the launch and planned improvement. Proc. SPIE. 2010;7862:786205. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wiens J, Sutter R, Anderson M, Blanchard J, Barnett A, Aguilar-Amuchastegui N, et al. Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: the role of remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009;113:1370–1381. [Google Scholar]
  40. Woodwell GM, Houghton RA, Tempel NR. Atmospheric CO2 at Brookhaven, Long Island, New York: Patterns of variation up to 125 meters. J. Geophys. Res. 1973;78:932–940. [Google Scholar]
  41. Xie W, Xiao W, Wang Y. The impact of open economy on carbon emissions: Evidences from China's provincial & industrial panel data. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Humanities and Social Sciences) 2011;41:163–173. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  42. Xiong X, Barnet C, Maddy E, Sweeney C, Liu X, Zhou L, et al. Characterization and validation of methane products from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci. 2008;113:G00A01. [Google Scholar]
  43. Xu Y, Wang J, Sun J, Xu Y, Warwick H. Spatial and temporal variations of lower tropospheric methane during 2010–2011 in China. IEEE J. Select. Top. in Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2012;5:1464–1473. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yoshida Y, Ota Y, Eguchi N, Kikuchi N, Nobuta K, Tran H, et al. Retrieval algorithm for CO2 and CH4 column abundances from short-wavelength infrared spectral observations by the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2011;4:717–734. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhao R, Huang X, Zhong T, Peng J. Carbon footprint of different industrial spaces based on energy consumption in China. J. Geog. Sci. 2011;21:285–300. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zou X, Chen S, Ning M, Liu Y. An empirical research on the influence factor of carbon emission in Chinese provincial regions. Ecol. Econ. 2009;4:34–37. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES