Abstract
The identification of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) as a major mediator of neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) tumor growth has led to the initiation of clinical trials using rapamycin analogs. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that durable responses to rapamycin treatment in a genetically-engineered mouse (GEM) model of Nf1 optic glioma require 20mg/kg/day, whereas only transient tumor growth suppression was observed with 5mg/kg/day rapamycin despite complete silencing of ribosomal S6 activity. To gain clinically-relevant insights into the mechanism underlying this dose-dependent effect, we employed Nf1-deficient glial cells in vitro and in vivo. First, there is an exponential relationship between blood and brain rapamycin levels. Second, we demonstrate that currently-used biomarkers of mTOR pathway inhibition (phospho-S6, phospho-4EBP1, phospho-STAT3, and Jagged-1 levels) and tumor proliferation (Ki67) do not accurately reflect mTOR target inhibition or Nf1-deficient glial growth suppression. Third, the incomplete suppression of Nf1-deficient glial cell proliferation in vivo following 5mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment reflects mTOR-mediated AKT activation, such that combined 5mg/kg/day rapamycin and PI3-Kinase (PI3K) inhibition or dual PI3K/mTOR inhibition recapitulates the growth suppressive effects of 20mg/kg/day rapamycin. These new findings argue for the identification of more accurate biomarkers for rapamycin treatment response, and provide reference preclinical data for comparing human rapamycin levels with target effects in the brain.
Keywords: glioma, astrocytoma, S6, preclinical, neurofibromin
Introduction
Individuals with the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) inherited cancer syndrome are prone to the development of brain (glial cell) tumors that arise in young children along the optic pathway (optic pathway glioma; OPG) (1, 2). NF1-associated OPGs are World Health Organization grade I astrocytomas composed of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-immunoreactive cells (3). These tumors have low proliferative indices and commonly exhibit indolent clinical behavior. While many of these tumors do not require treatment, those that lead to reduced visual function are managed with carboplatin/vincristine chemotherapy. However, genotoxic therapies are concerning in the setting of a tumor predisposition syndrome. For this reason, numerous studies have focused on the identification of targeted therapies for these common tumors in children with NF1 (4, 5).
To develop preclinical small-animal models of NF1-associated optic glioma, we and others have employed genetically-engineered Nf1 mutant mice (6, 7). Nf1+/− mice with Nf1 gene inactivation in GFAP+ cells develop optic gliomas in the prechiasmatic optic nerve and chiasm by 3 months of age (8, 9). Similar to their human counterparts, these Nf1 mouse gliomas have low proliferative indices, and exhibit microglial infiltration and increased vascularity (9, 10). Based on their similarity to NF1-associated optic glioma, Nf1 GEM have been successfully employed for proof-of-principle preclinical studies using conventionally-used chemotherapy (temozolomide) to demonstrate tumor shrinkage, reduced glioma proliferation, and increased tumor apoptosis (11).
Analysis of Nf1-deficient astrocytes as well as other NF1-deficient cell types previously revealed that the NF1 protein, neurofibromin, functions to negatively regulate cell growth by inactivating the Ras proto-oncogene (12, 13). Neurofibromin contains a 300 amino acid residue domain with sequence similarity to members of the GTPase activating protein (GAP) family of molecules that serve to accelerate the conversion of Ras from its active GTP-bound to its inactive GDP-bound form (14–16). Subsequent studies further showed that neurofibromin Ras-mediated growth regulation operates through the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway (17, 18). In this regard, NF1-deficient human and mouse cells exhibit increased mTOR pathway activation as evidenced by high levels of activity of the mTOR effector, ribosomal S6. Using activation-specific S6 phospho-antibodies, several groups showed increased mTOR activation in human and mouse NF1-associated tumors, including human and mouse optic gliomas. This exciting finding prompted investigators to perform preclinical studies using the rapamycin macrolide to inhibit mTOR activation and NF1-deficient tumor growth in vivo (11, 17, 19). In these studies, we previously showed that Nf1 mouse optic glioma proliferation was reduced following rapamycin treatment. Treatment with 5 mg/kg/day rapamycin for 14 days resulted in reduced tumor proliferation using Ki67 (MIB-1) immunohistochemistry and attenuated mTOR pathway activation by phospho-S6 immunostaining; however, this effect was dependent on the continued presence of rapamycin, such that proliferation and mTOR activity returned to pre-treatment levels 2 weeks after the cessation of rapamycin treatment. In contrast, Nf1 mutant mice treated with 20 mg/kg/day rapamycin had a durable response that was not dependent on continued drug dosing (11). These interesting results prompted us to define the molecular basis for this treatment effect.
In the current study, we measured rapamycin levels in the blood and brain in Nf1 mutant mice following treatment with 0, 2, 5 and 20 mg/kg/day rapamycin, and correlated drug dose with mTOR pathway signaling and proliferation in vivo. We found that 5 mg/kg/day rapamycin dosing resulted in increased AKT activation, which was suppressed following 20 mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment. However, neither Ki67 nor phospho-S6 activity were robust biomarkers for the in vivo response to rapamycin. Instead, phospho-histone-H3 most strongly correlated with combined inhibition of both S6 and AKT phosphorylation. We recapitulated these in vivo results using Nf1-deficient mouse low-grade glioma cells in vitro to demonstrate that combined treatment with rapamycin and the LY294002 PI3-Kinase inhibitor suppressed cell growth to levels seen with higher doses of rapamycin alone. Collectively, these data suggest that additional biomarkers will be required to adequately assess mTOR target inhibition and tumor proliferative responses to rapamycin treatment in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Mice
Five-six week-old Nf1GFAPCKO mice (Nf1flox/flox; GFAP-Cre) were used. These mice lack Nf1 gene expression in GFAP+ (glial) cells, and were generated by successive intercrossing of Nf1flox/flox and Nf1flox/wt; GFAP-Cre mice as previously described (6). All mice were used in accordance with established and approved animal studies protocols at the Washington University School of Medicine. Mice were maintained on an inbred C57BI/6 background.
mTOR inhibitor (rapamycin) treatment in vivo
Rapamycin (LC Laboratories, Woburn MA) was administered at the indicated doses (2 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, or 20mg/kg) by daily intraperitoneal (i.p) injections of rapamycin dissolved in ethanol (5 days per week for 2 weeks total). Vehicle-treated mice received daily injections of an identical solution lacking rapamycin. At least five mice were included in each treatment group. After the final injection, mice were euthanized. Blood samples were collected for rapamycin concentration determination, and then the mice were perfused with ice-cold normal saline. Brains were dissected and half of the brain was kept at −80°C to measure brain rapamycin concentrations. The remaining brain was divided into two parts for Western blotting and vibratome sectioning for Ki67 determinations.
Measurement of blood and brain rapamycin levels
Calibrators and quality controls were prepared by spiking known amounts of Sirolimus into blank EDTA mouse blood or homogenized mouse brain tissue (Bioreclamation, Hicksville, NY). Sirolimus and the internal standard sirolimus-d3 were from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON). Samples were extracted and analyzed using a modification of an online extraction liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) assay previously described for the analysis of zotarolimus in blood and tissues (20). Mouse brains were weighed, HPLC-grade water was added (1:3) [w/v] and tissues were homogenized. For protein precipitation of 100 μL brain homogenates or 100 μL EDTA blood, 400 μL of ZnSO4.7H2O (17.28g/L) in 30:70 (v/v) HPLC grade water / HPLC grade methanol containing the internal standard sirolimus-d3 (5 ng/mL) was added. Samples were vortexed for 2.5 minutes at room temperature and centrifuged at 13,000·g for 8 minutes at 4°C using a bench-top microfuge. The supernatant was transferred into 2 mL HPLC autosampler glass vials and 100 μL was injected into the LC/LC-MS/MS system (HPLC Agilent 1100 Series, Applied Biosystems/Sciex API 4000). HPLC I was used for on-line sample extraction, HPLC II for sample analysis and both were connected via a 6-port switching valve (20).
For on-line sample clean-up, an extraction column (4.6 × 12.5 mm, 5μm, Eclipse XDB-C8, Agilent) was used and samples were washed using 20% HPLC grade methanol / 80% HPLC grade water + 0.1% formic acid delivered at a flow rate of 5mL/min for 1min. The analytes were then back-flushed onto a C8 analytical column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5μm, Zorbax XDB -C8, Agilent) that was kept at 65°C. The following gradient was run: 87% methanol/ 13% 0.1% formic acid to 100% methanol within 2.0 min and then 100% methanol for an additional 1.5 min. The flow rate was 1mL/min. The mass spectrometer was run in the positive MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) mode. The de-solvation gas was heated to 600°C, the declustering potential (DP) was set to 160 V and the collision energy (CE) to 77eV. The following ion transitions were monitored: m/z= 936.5→ 409.3 for sirolimus [M+Na+] and m/z 939.5→ 409.3 for the internal standard sirolimus-d3 [M+Na+]. The lower limit of quantitation in mouse brain tissue was 2μg/g and in EDTA blood 0.5ng/mL. The range of reliable response was 2–1000 μg/g and 1– 5000 ng/mL, respectively (r>0.99). The interday accuracy was between 85–115% and total imprecision <15%. No relevant carry-over, matrix interferences and ion suppression/ ion enhancement were detected.
Cell lines
The mouse K4622 grade II glioma cell line was derived from a C57Bl/6 Nf1+/−; p53+/− mouse and was shown to be both Nf1- and p53-deficient (21). These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagles' Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Pen-Strep.
Pharmacologic inhibitors
Rapamycin (LC Laboratories, catalog number R-5000; Supplementary Fig. S1A), NVP-BEZ235 (LC Laboratories, catalog number 915019-65-7; Supplementary Fig. S1B), and LY294002 (Calbiochem, San Diego CA) were purchased from commercial sources. In vitro treatments were for 16–18h unless otherwise indicated. Experiments were performed at least three times with identical results.
Cell proliferation
K4622 mouse glioma cells were plated (10,000 cells per well) in 24-well dishes and allowed to adhere for 24 h followed by treatment with rapamycin, NVP-BEZ235, or LY294002 at the indicated concentrations. Cells were exposed to [3H]-thymidine (1 μCi/mL) for 4h. All assays were performed thrice with identical results (18, 21).
Immunohistochemistry
Brain tissues from rapamycin-treated or vehicle-treated mice were post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Following sectioning on a vibratome, immunostaining with Ki67 (BD PharMingen, Pasadena CA) antibodies was performed as previously described (6). The number of Ki-67–immunoreactive cells in the dentate gyrus was quantified by direct counting on three consecutive sections from each mouse.
Western Blotting
Brain tissues were harvested in NP-40 lysis buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors and homogenized by mechanical disruption. K4622 cells were lysed in standard NP-40 lysis buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Western blotting was performed as previously described (22). All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MD) and used at a 1:1,000 dilution unless otherwise stated. Primary phospho-histone-H3 (Ser10) antibody was purchased from Abcam, Inc. Following horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) incubation, detection was accomplished by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences, Pittsburgh, PA). Densitometry analysis was performed with Gel-Pro Analyzer 4.0 software (Media Cybernetics; Silver Spring, MD) using α-tubulin (Sigma, St. Louis MO), β-actin or non-phospho-STAT3, AKT, S6, and 4EBP1 antibodies for normalization.
Statistical analysis
The measures of all biomarkers were summarized using the mean and standard error of mean (SEM). The raw data were checked graphically and data transformation was performed as necessary. The relationship between blood and brain rapamycin concentrations was described by linear regression analysis. For each biomarker, the differences of means among rapamycin dose levels were compared using 1-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc tests to compare individual treatment conditions to the wild-type or untreated group. To control the family-wise false-positive rate at the designed 0.05 level, however, such post-hoc comparisons were conducted only if the overall difference in ANOVA was significant. All the analyses were implemented by the comprehensive statistical package R (http://cran.r-project.org/) and p values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Brain rapamycin levels are exponentially correlated with blood rapamycin levels
One of the major obstacles in translating preclinical drug studies to human clinical trials is a relative paucity of reported blood and target tissue drug levels. In these studies, we sought to determine whether rapamycin crosses the blood-brain barrier and how brain tissue levels correlated with rapamycin dose and circulating levels. First, we measured rapamycin concentrations in the blood and brain tissue of 6–8 week-old Nf1GFAPCKO mice either treated with rapamycin or vehicle daily for 2 consecutive weeks. Nf1GFAPCKO mice were chosen as they lack neurofibromin expression in glial cells (astrocytes), but do not develop tumors. The optic glioma tumors in Nf1+/−GFAPCKO mice are too small for accurate determinations of rapamycin levels or drug target inhibition. Using LC/LC-MS/MS assay methods, we found dose-dependent increases in rapamycin concentrations in blood (Fig. 1A) and brain tissue (Fig. 1B). These observations demonstrated that intraperitoneal rapamycin administration increases both blood and brain levels. However, brain rapamycin levels were exponentially correlated with blood rapamycin levels (Fig. 1C) (R2= 0.8 and P<0.0001).
Figure 1. Brain rapamycin levels are exponentially correlated with blood rapamycin levels.

A, top, Blood rapamycin concentration was increased with increasing dose as measured by LC/LC-MS/MS, and represented as a column graph. Error bars represent the SEM. Bottom, representative Scatter plot shows the linear regression analysis [R2 = 0.91, P<0.0001). B, Rapamycin concentrations in brain tissue were increased as a function of dose (top). Error bars represent the SEM. Bottom, Scatter plot shows the linear regression analysis [R2 = 0.91, P<0.0001]. C, The relationship between blood and brain rapamycin was exponential [R2 = 0.8, P<0.0001]. Data from five mice per treatment group were included and all the R2 and P values were obtained after logarithm data transformation. *P<0.01, ** P<0.001, ***P<0.0001.
Phospho-S6 is not a reliable biomarker of rapamycin inhibition in the brain
Assessment of drug effects often involves the use of surrogate markers of drug target inhibition. Rapamycin is a robust inhibitor of mTOR signaling, and is most effective at blocking TORC1 activity (23–27). TORC1 signaling involves raptor-mediated activation of ribosomal S6 kinase and S6. To this end, activation-specific phospho-S6 antibodies have been employed as a surrogate biomarker of mTOR inhibition by rapamycin and rapamycin analogs. First, we measured phospho-S6 levels in rapamycin- (2, 5, 20 mg/kg/day) or vehicle-treated Nf1GFAPCKO mouse brains. Rapamycin treatment at 5 and 20mg/kg/day doses resulted in suppression of S6 activation using both phospho-S6-Ser235/236 (Fig. 2A) and phospho-S6-Ser240/244 (data not shown) antibodies after normalization to total S6 levels. No significant phospho-S6 reduction was observed at the 2mg/kg/day rapamycin dose. Identical results were also obtained if the total number of phospho-S6-immunoreactive cells were quantitated by immunohistochemistry in the brains of Nf1GFAPCKO mice following rapamycin treatment (data not shown).
Figure 2. Phospho-S6 is not a reliable biomarker of rapamycin inhibition in the brain.
A, left, mTOR inhibition was demonstrated following rapamycin treatment of Nf1GFAPCKO mice (5 and 20mg/kg/day) using the phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) surrogate biomarker. No significant inhibition was observed at 2mg/kg/day. Total S6 served as an internal loading control. Asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (P<0.05) between control and rapamycin-treated mice. Fold changes as determined by scanning densitometry are shown in the right panel. B, 4EBP1 Thr37/46 phosphorylation (left) was significantly decreased (*P<0.05) following 5 and 20mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment. Total 4EBP1 was included as an internal loading control (quantitation was included in the right panel). C, Western blotting with activation-specific STAT3 (Ser727) antibodies shows that rapamycin-treated (5 and 20mg/kg/day) mice have significantly reduced STAT3 activation by Western blotting (left) and densitometry (right). No inhibition was observed following 2mg/kg/day rapamycin. Total STAT3 was used as an internal loading control. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).
Second, to additionally evaluate mTOR activity in the brain after rapamycin treatment, we examined Thr37/46 phosphorylation of the mTOR effector 4EBP1 (Fig. 2B). Similar to S6 activation, 4EBP1 phosphorylation was unchanged at the 2mg/kg/day dose, whereas significant reductions were observed both at 5 and 20mg/kg/day rapamycin doses. Third, recent studies demonstrated that mTOR regulates Jagged-1 levels in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-deficient cells (28). To determine whether Jagged-1 levels are elevated in Nf1-deficient primary astrocytes, we performed Western blotting. We observed a 2-fold increase in Jagged-1 protein expression in Nf1−/− relative to wild-type astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. S2A). This increase in Jagged-1 protein expression was inhibited by rapamycin treatment; however, Jagged-1 levels were reduced in Nf1GFAPCKO mice treated with 2mg/kg/day rapamycin – a dose where no change in phospho-S6 expression was seen (Supplementary Fig. S2B).
While neurofibromin regulates cell growth through the mTOR pathway in many distinct cell types, we previously demonstrated that increased Nf1-deficient astrocyte growth reflects raptor-dependent signaling through the Rac1/STAT3 pathway (21). In light of this tissue specificity, we next measured STAT3 activation using phospho-STAT3 (Ser727) antibodies. Consistent with the results obtained using phospho-S6 and phospho-4EBP1, STAT3 inhibition was only observed in the brain at the 5 and 20 mg/kg/day doses (Fig. 2C). Collectively, these data demonstrate that inhibition of mTOR downstream signaling in the brain requires at least 5mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment.
Ki67 does not accurately reflect rapamycin inhibition of glial cell proliferation in vivo
Previous preclinical studies from our laboratory and others have employed Ki67 as a marker of tumor cell proliferation (11, 29). In these studies, we found that either the number of Ki67 cells or the percent of Ki67-positive cells in Nf1+/−GFAPCKO mouse optic glioma tumors or Nf1-deficient glial cells correlated well with other markers of cell proliferation in vivo, including BrdU incorporation (11). To determine whether Ki67 accurately reflected rapamycin inhibition of Nf1-deficient brain glial cell proliferation in vivo, we quantified the number of proliferating cells in a defined region of the dentate gyrus using standard Ki67 (MIB-1) immunostaining. Surprisingly, we observed a significant decrease in the number of Ki67-immunoreactive (proliferating) cells (Fig. 3A) at 2mg/kg/day rapamycin. As shown above, 2mg/kg/day rapamycin did not inhibit mTOR signaling. This finding suggests that Ki67 may not be the ideal marker to measure glial cell proliferation in preclinical Nf1 GEM low-grade glioma rapamycin drug studies. Using a less conventional marker of cell proliferation (PCNA), statistically significant reductions in cell proliferation were only observed following 20 mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. S3B). However, the low numbers of PCNA-immunoreactive cells present in each section limits the routine use of this marker for preclinical studies, consistent with other reports comparing these two biomarkers (Scott RJ, J Pathol 1991; Bromley M, Eur J Histochem 1996; Kordek R, Acta Neurochimurgica 1996; Mushkelishvili L, J Histochem Cytochem 2003).
Figure 3. Ki67 does not accurately reflect rapamycin inhibition of glial cell proliferation in vivo.
A, Ki67 (MIB-1) immunolabeling (left) shows significantly decreased proliferation in the dentate gyrus in rapamycin (2, 5 and 20mg/kg/day)-treated mice compared to vehicle-treated controls (quantitation in right panel). Inset shows an enlarged view of the Ki67+ cell indicated by the arrow. Magnification=x200. Scale bar, 100μM. Asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (P<0.0001). B, Western blotting (left) of brain lysates from rapamycin- and vehicle-treated mice shows significant inhibition of cyclin D1 expression (P=0.036) following 20mg/kg/day rapamycin (right). C, 20mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment reduced histone-H3 phosphorylation (Ser10 phosphorylation) by Western blotting (left) and densitometry (right). Actin was used as an internal control for equal protein loading. Asterisks (*) denote statistically significant differences (P<0.02).
To identify more accurate markers of Nf1-deficient glial cell proliferation in vivo, we next measured cyclin D1 levels. Cyclin D1 was chosen, based on our previous studies which demonstrated that STAT3 regulates cyclin D1 expression in Nf1-deficient cells (21). Interestingly, we found that inhibition of cyclin D1 was only observed at 20mg/kg/day rapamycin dosing (Fig. 3B). To confirm the apparent inhibition of cell growth only at 20mg/kg/day rapamycin dosing, we measured phospho-histone H3 (HH3) levels using phospho-HH3 (Ser10) antibodies. Similar to the results obtained using cyclin D1 antibodies; we observed reduced phospho-HH3 only with 20mg/kg/day rapamycin (Fig. 3C). Collectively, these results demonstrate that phospho-HH3 and cyclin D1 may be more accurate indicators of mTOR-mediated glial growth inhibition in the brain.
The inability of 5mg/kg/day rapamycin to strongly inhibit glial proliferation in vivo reflects AKT hyperactivation
Based on the results described above, we sought to determine why equivalent mTOR pathway inhibition using several surrogate markers of mTOR activity was observed following 5 and 20mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment; however, only 20mg/kg/day rapamycin led to reduced glial cell proliferation in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated that rapamycin inhibition can paradoxically cause an increase AKT activation as a result of inhibition of TORC1-mediated AKT inhibition and/or TORC2-mediated AKT activation (30–33). While this anomalous AKT activation has been reported in human NF1-associated tumors (19, 29), this has not been previously observed in Nf1 GEM tumors or primary tissues (11, 34). To determine whether AKT activation was seen in the brain following rapamycin treatment, we measured AKT Ser473 phosphorylation in vivo, and found a 4-fold increase in AKT activation at 5mg/kg/day, but not at 2 or 20mg/kg/day. These results suggest that AKT activation might counteract the growth suppressive effects of rapamycin-mediated mTOR inhibition.
To establish an in vitro model for these observations, we examined AKT activation, mTOR activity and cell proliferation in Nf1-deficient K4622 glioma cells treated over a wide range of rapamycin concentrations from 0.001nM to 500 nM (data not shown). Based on this dose range, we selected three rapamycin doses (0.001nM, 0.75nM and 10nM) to parallel the effects of 2, 5, and 20 mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment. Similar to the results obtained following 5mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment in vivo, we found that 0.75nM rapamycin resulted in a 5-fold increase in AKT activation compared to vehicle control, whereas no change in AKT Ser473 phosphorylation was observed at 0.001nM or 10nM rapamycin (Fig. 4A). No change in AKT phosphorylation at residue Thr-308 was observed following 0.75 nM rapamycin treatment (Supplementary Fig. S4A), and no increased in AKT Thr-308 phosphorylation was found in Nf1-deficient astrocytes relative to their wild-type controls (data not shown). In addition, S6-Ser235/236, STAT3-Ser727, and 4EBP1-Thr37/46 phosphorylation was decreased in a rapamycin dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4. The inability of 5mg/kg/day rapamycin to inhibit glial proliferation in vivo reflects AKT hyperactivation.
A, Top, Increased AKT-Ser473 phosphorylation was observed after 5mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment, but not 2 or 20mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment. Equal protein loading was confirmed by total AKT immunoblotting. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference (P=0.01). B, K4622 cells were treated either with ethanol (vehicle) or three different concentrations of rapamycin (0.001 nM, 0.75nM and 10nM). Western blot analysis of phospho-S6 (Ser235/236), STAT3 (Ser727), 4EBP1 (Thr37/46) and AKT (Ser473) levels in Nf1-deficient K4622 glioma cells following rapamycin treatment. Total S6, STAT3, 4EBP1, AKT and α-tubulin served as internal loading controls. C, 0.001nM, 0.75nM and 10nM rapamycin treatment reduced K4622 glioma cell growth by 14%, 35.6% (P<0.05) and 78% (P<0.0001), respectively, as measured by [3H]-thymidine incorporation. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference. D, Western blotting of K4622 cell lysates demonstrates inhibition of phospho-histone H3 activation following rapamycin treatment. α-tubulin was included as an internal loading control. Relative density (R.D.) values are included at the bottom of the corresponding blots.
Next, to determine whether rapamycin inhibits Nf1-deficient glioma cell proliferation in vitro, we examined the effect of rapamycin treatment (0.001nM, 0.75nM and 10nM) on [3H]-thymidine incorporation and histone-H3-Ser10 phosphorylation. Similar to the above in vivo results, we observed a maximum inhibitory effect on cell growth and histone-H3 phosphorylation following 10nM rapamycin treatment (Fig. 4C–D), with no further inhibition observed at 100 or 500 nM doses (Supplementary Fig. S5). Collectively, these results suggest that effective brain glial cell growth inhibition by rapamycin requires doses that inhibit both TORC1 (S6; 4EBP1, and STAT3) and TORC2 (AKT) downstream pathways.
Maximal Nf1- deficient glial cell growth inhibition requires both mTOR and AKT silencing
Since maximal glial growth inhibition was only observed when both raptor-mediated (S6, 4EBP1, STAT3) and rictor-mediated (AKT) mTOR downstream pathways were silenced by rapamycin treatment, we next sought to determine whether combined rapamycin and AKT inhibition could suppress Nf1−/− glioma cell growth similar to “high dose” (10nM) rapamycin treatment. In these experiments, we examined the effect of combined mTOR (rapamycin) and PI3-K inhibitor (LY294002) treatment on [3H]-thymidine incorporation and S6-Ser235/236, STAT3-Ser727 and AKT-Ser473 phosphorylation in K4622 Nf1-deficient mouse glioma cells. Following 0.75nM rapamycin treatment, S6-Ser235/236 and STAT3-Ser727 phosphorylation (Fig. 5A) was significantly attenuated, and cell proliferation (Fig. 5B) was reduced by ~36%. Whereas pharmacological inhibition of PI3-K (30 μM) reduced K4622 glioma cell growth by 50%, combined 0.750nM rapamycin and 30 μM LY294002 treatment resulted in an 81% reduction in cell proliferation (Fig. 5B), similar to what was obtained following 10nM rapamycin treatment. This reduction in cell growth was not the result of increased apoptosis, as assessed by cleaved PARP immunoblotting (Supplementary Fig. S4).
Figure 5. Maximal Nf1-deficient glial cell growth inhibition requires both mTOR and AKT silencing.

A, Combined LY294002 PI3K and rapamycin mTOR inhibition reduces S6-Ser235/236 AKT-Ser473 and STAT3-Ser727 phosphorylation. Total AKT, S6 and STAT3 are included as internal loading controls. B, Combined 0.75nM rapamycin and 30μM LY294002 treatment inhibits cell growth (~81%, P<0.0001) compared to 0.75nM rapamycin (P=0.01) or 30μM LY294002 (P=0.032) alone. No statistically significant differences were observed between rapamycin and LY294002 treatments alone. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference. Relative density (R.D.) values are included at the bottom of the corresponding blots.
Next, we employed the NVP-BEZ235 dual kinase inhibitor to target both PI3K and mTOR (Maira SM, Mol Cancer Ther 2008; Liu TJ, Mol Cancer Ther 2009). Consistent with the results obtained following combined LY294002 and rapamycin treatment, AKT and mTOR (S6, STAT3 and 4EBP1) phosphorylation were blocked by NVP-BEZ235 at all doses examined (Fig. 6A). As above, AKT phosphorylation on residue Ser-473, but not Thr-308, was inhibited by NVPBEZ235 treatment. The observed suppression of AKT and mTOR activities resulted in inhibition of Nf1-deficient K4622 glioma cell growth (Fig. 6B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that combined PI3K and mTOR blockade effectively inhibits Nf1-deficient glioma proliferation
Figure 6. Treatment with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 inhibits Nf1-deficient glioma cell growth.
A, Nf1-deficient K4622 glioma cells were treated with DMSO (vehicle) or three different concentrations of NVP-BEZ235 (0.5, 1 and 2.5 μM). Western blot analysis following NVP-BEZ235 treatment revealed reduced AKT (Ser473), S6 (Ser235/236), STAT3 (Ser727), and 4EBP1 (Thr37/46) phosphorylation. Total S6, AKT, 4EBP1 and STAT3 served as internal protein loading controls. Relative density (R.D.) values are included at the bottom of the corresponding blots. B, NVP-BEZ235 treatment reduced K4622 glioma cell growth by ~90% (P<0.0001), similar to combined treatment with LY294002 and rapamycin. Asterisks (*) denote a statistically significant difference.
Discussion
Preclinical cancer studies are designed to provide instructive information that informs human clinical trials. These small-animal drug trials aim to assess drug efficacy in the intact animal, correlate target inhibition with tumor growth suppression, and/or validate surrogate biomarkers of treatment success. The ability to achieve these objectives is highly dependent on the availability of accurate models that duplicate key features of the human condition coupled with a rigorous evaluation of potential drug therapies. In the case of NF1-associated tumors, including optic glioma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), rapamycin inhibits tumor growth in vivo (11, 19, 29, 34). However, in these various models, there were significant differences in the dose of rapamycin employed (1mg/kg/day to 20mg/kg/day) and the effects of rapamycin on mTOR signaling. This variation could reflect differences in tumor species of origin (mouse; (11, 34) versus human (19, 29)), host species immunocompetence (genetically-engineered mice (11, 34) versus tumor explants into immunocompromised mice (19, 29)), or tumor location (brain (11, 34) versus body (19, 29, 34)). Similarly, these differences could result from disparities in rapamycin bioavailability. In the current report, we performed a series of experiments to address some of these critical issues.
First, we sought to define the relationship between blood and brain rapamycin levels and drug dose. While we observed a dose-dependent increase in both blood and brain rapamycin concentrations with escalating rapamycin doses, the relationship between blood and brain rapamycin levels deserves further discussion. Most Nf1 mouse preclinical studies have employed rapamycin doses between 1 and 10 mg/kg/day (11, 34). In the brain, there was a linear relationship between blood and brain rapamycin concentrations at the lower doses (2 and 5 mg/kg/day); however, we observed an exponential relationship at the higher dose (20mg/kg/day). This result suggests that rapamycin brain delivery may involve different order kinetics than that observed for peripheral tissues. It is well established that p-glycoprotein as an efflux transporter is a critical component of the blood-brain barrier (35). As such, it limits the entry of drugs that are substrates, like rapamycin, into the brain (36). Our data may indicate that at the highest rapamycin dose (20 mg/kg) systemic rapamycin exposure exceeds the capacity of brain barrier efflux transporters, leading to the observed exponential increase in brain rapamycin concentrations.
Next, we evaluated mTOR target inhibition in the brain following rapamycin treatment, and were surprised to find that phospho-S6 inhibition did not correlate with reduced Nf1-deficient glial cell proliferation. This is consistent with in vitro studies using Nf1-deficient NPCis glioma cells or primary brain astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. S6A–B). In these experiments, >90% reduction in phospho-S6 levels (using either phospho-Ser235/236 or phospho-S6-Ser240/244 antibodies) was seen at rapamycin doses 10-fold lower than doses required to inhibit Nf1-deficient glial cell proliferation. Similarly, other mTOR downstream effectors, including STAT3 and 4EBP1, showed similar relationships between target inhibition and growth suppression. These findings suggest that maximal rapamycin-mediated growth suppression involves more than mTOR/raptor downstream target inhibition.
It is also possible that the inability of mTOR/raptor inhibition (phospho-S6/4EBP1/STAT3 levels) to predict mTOR-mediated growth suppression reflects rapamycin-induced mTOR-dependent AKT activation. Following 5mg/kg/day rapamycin treatment, there is increased AKT Ser-473 phosphorylation in the brains of Nf1GFAPCKO mice. To model this rapamycin effect in vitro, we employed Nf1-deficient NPCis mouse glioma cells, and show that 0.75nM rapamycin likewise increases AKT activation. Following simultaneous PI3-Kinase and mTOR inhibition, NPCis glioma cell growth inhibition is similar to that observed with high-dose rapamycin treatment alone. While these findings indicate that maximal growth suppression requires silencing of both mTOR and AKT activation, the combined use of phospho-AKT and phospho-S6 as surrogate biomarkers would be misleading. It would be impossible to determine whether low phospho-AKT and phospho-S6 levels in the tumor reflect inadequate target inhibition (2mg/kg/day) or the desired effect (20mg/kg/day). In this regard, there is a pressing need for more accurate biomarkers that better demonstrate optimal mTOR pathway inhibition following rapamycin treatment.
Previous rapamycin-based Nf1 preclinical mouse model drug studies have measured tumor volume, and observed that tumor size reduction was completely dependent on continuous drug treatment. In the Nf1 GEM optic glioma model, we found that cessation of 5mg/kg/day rapamycin therapy resulted in increased tumor proliferation (as assessed by Ki67 immunohistochemistry) and increased tumor volume within 2 weeks. Similar findings were reported in NF1-associated MPNST preclinical studies, supporting the conclusion that these doses of rapamycin do not achieve a durable effect. One exception to this short-lived anti-tumoral response was seen following 20mg/kg/day rapamycin in Nf1 GEM optic glioma (11). For this reason, we sought to identify proliferation biomarkers that correlate with the sustained tumor growth suppression. In the current study, we found that phospho-histone-H3 and cyclin D1 more accurately reflected reduced Nf1-deficient glial cell growth in response to rapamycin in vitro and in vivo. The finding that cyclin D1 levels paralleled growth inhibition has also been noted in NF1-deficient MPNST preclinical studies (34). To this end, re-expression of the GTPase activating domain (GRD) of neurofibromin was sufficient to restore cyclin D1 levels to normal.
As we attempt to leverage the emerging experience with GEM preclinical therapeutic studies to design more effective drug regimens for brain tumors, it becomes increasingly important to validate surrogate markers of disease activity and target inhibition in relevant small-animal models. The findings described in this study suggest that blood rapamycin levels do not accurately reflect brain concentrations and that currently-employed mTOR signaling biomarkers inadequately correlate with inhibition of Nf1−/− glial cell proliferation. Moreover, as suggested by other preclinical studies on glioma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (references 42, 43), dual kinase inhibitors that block both PI3K and mTOR function may have particular efficacy in the treatment of NF1-associated glioma. Future studies should focus on identifying additional surrogate biomarkers for NF1-deficient tumors suitable for preclinical and eventually clinical studies targeting the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway (37–43). The availability of more accurate biomarkers may increase the utility of preclinical mouse models in informing human clinical drug trials.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial/grant support: This work was funded in part by a grant from the Department of Defense to DHG (W81XWH061022). The Siteman Cancer Center is supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30-CA91842.
Footnotes
Potential conflicts of interest: none
References
- 1.Listernick R, Ferner RE, Liu GT, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis-1: controversies and recommendations. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:189–98. doi: 10.1002/ana.21107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Listernick R, Louis DN, Packer RJ, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Optic Pathway Glioma Task Force. Ann Neurol. 1997;41:143–9. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scheithauer BW, Hawkins C, Tihan T, VandenBerg SR, Burger PC. Pilocytic astrocytoma. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. International agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon: 2007. pp. 14–21. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burzynski SR. Treatments for astrocytic tumors in children: current and emerging strategies. Paediatr Drugs. 2006;8:167–78. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200608030-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gottfried ON, Viskochil DH, Couldwell WT. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and tumorigenesis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8. doi: 10.3171/2009.11.FOCUS09221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bajenaru ML, Zhu Y, Hedrick NM, Donahoe J, Parada LF, Gutmann DH. Astrocyte-specific inactivation of the neurofibromatosis 1 gene (NF1) is insufficient for astrocytoma formation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:5100–13. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.14.5100-5113.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu Y, Harada T, Liu L, et al. Inactivation of NF1 in CNS causes increased glial progenitor proliferation and optic glioma formation. Development. 2005;132:5577–88. doi: 10.1242/dev.02162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bajenaru ML, Hernandez MR, Perry A, et al. Optic nerve glioma in mice requires astrocyte Nf1 gene inactivation and Nf1 brain heterozygosity. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8573–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bajenaru ML, Garbow JR, Perry A, Hernandez MR, Gutmann DH. Natural history of neurofibromatosis 1-associated optic nerve glioma in mice. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:119–27. doi: 10.1002/ana.20337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Daginakatte GC, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis-1 (Nf1) heterozygous brain microglia elaborate paracrine factors that promote Nf1-deficient astrocyte and glioma growth. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:1098–112. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hegedus B, Banerjee D, Yeh TH, et al. Preclinical cancer therapy in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis-1 optic glioma. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1520–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.DeClue JE, Papageorge AG, Fletcher JA, et al. Abnormal regulation of mammalian p21ras contributes to malignant tumor growth in von Recklinghausen (type 1) neurofibromatosis. Cell. 1992;69:265–73. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90407-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Basu TN, Gutmann DH, Fletcher JA, Glover TW, Collins FS, Downward J. Aberrant regulation of ras proteins in malignant tumour cells from type 1 neurofibromatosis patients. Nature. 1992;356:713–5. doi: 10.1038/356713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ballester R, Marchuk D, Boguski M, et al. The NF1 locus encodes a protein functionally related to mammalian GAP and yeast IRA proteins. Cell. 1990;63:851–9. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90151-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martin GA, Viskochil D, Bollag G, et al. The GAP-related domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product interacts with ras p21. Cell. 1990;63:843–9. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90150-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu GF, O'Connell P, Viskochil D, et al. The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP. Cell. 1990;62:599–608. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johannessen CM, Reczek EE, James MF, Brems H, Legius E, Cichowski K. The NF1 tumor suppressor critically regulates TSC2 and mTOR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8573–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503224102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dasgupta B, Yi Y, Chen DY, Weber JD, Gutmann DH. Proteomic analysis reveals hyperactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in neurofibromatosis 1-associated human and mouse brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2755–60. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Johansson G, Mahller YY, Collins MH, et al. Effective in vivo targeting of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1237–45. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang YL, Bendrick-Peart J, Strom T, Haschke M, Christians U. Development and validation of a high-throughput assay for quantification of the proliferation inhibitor ABT-578 using LC/LC-MS/MS in blood and tissue samples. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27:770–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000185766.52126.bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Banerjee S, Byrd JN, Gianino SM, et al. The neurofibromatosis type 1 tumor suppressor controls cell growth by regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 activity in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1356–66. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sandsmark DK, Zhang H, Hegedus B, Pelletier CL, Weber JD, Gutmann DH. Nucleophosmin mediates mammalian target of rapamycin-dependent actin cytoskeleton dynamics and proliferation in neurofibromin-deficient astrocytes. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4790–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Fonseca BD, Tang H, et al. Re-evaluating the roles of proposed modulators of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:30482–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M803348200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu L, Li F, Cardelli JA, Martin KA, Blenis J, Huang S. Rapamycin inhibits cell motility by suppression of mTOR-mediated S6K1 and 4E-BP1 pathways. Oncogene. 2006;25:7029–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang Q, Inoki K, Kim E, Guan KL. TSC1/TSC2 and Rheb have different effects on TORC1 and TORC2 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:6811–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602282103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jacinto E, Loewith R, Schmidt A, et al. Mammalian TOR complex 2 controls the actin cytoskeleton and is rapamycin insensitive. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:1122–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Loewith R, Jacinto E, Wullschleger S, et al. Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell. 2002;10:457–68. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00636-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ma J, Meng Y, Kwiatkowski DJ, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin regulates murine and human cell differentiation through STAT3/p63/Jagged/Notch cascade. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:103–14. doi: 10.1172/JCI37964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bhola P, Banerjee S, Mukherjee J, et al. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of rapamycin in human malignant peripheral nerve sheath explant xenograft. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:563–71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shi Y, Yan H, Frost P, Gera J, Lichtenstein A. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors activate the AKT kinase in multiple myeloma cells by up-regulating the insulin-like growth factor receptor/insulin receptor substrate-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase cascade. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1533–40. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sun SY, Rosenberg LM, Wang X, et al. Activation of Akt and eIF4E survival pathways by rapamycin-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7052–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.O'Reilly KE, Rojo F, She QB, et al. mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1500–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wan X, Harkavy B, Shen N, Grohar P, Helman LJ. Rapamycin induces feedback activation of Akt signaling through an IGF-1R-dependent mechanism. Oncogene. 2007;26:1932–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Johannessen CM, Johnson BW, Williams SM, et al. TORC1 is essential for NF1-associated malignancies. Curr Biol. 2008;18:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schinkel AH, Wagenaar E, van Deemter L, Mol CA, Borst P. Absence of the mdr1a P-Glycoprotein in mice affects tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone, digoxin, and cyclosporin A. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1698–705. doi: 10.1172/JCI118214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Christians U, Strom T, Zhang YL, et al. Active drug transport of immunosuppressants: new insights for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Ther Drug Monit. 2006;28:39–44. doi: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000183385.27394.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kreisl TN, Lassman AB, Mischel PS, et al. A pilot study of everolimus and gefitinib in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) J Neurooncol. 2009;92:99–105. doi: 10.1007/s11060-008-9741-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sparagana SP, Wilkes DC, Thompson CE, Bowers DC. Optic nerve tumor in tuberous sclerosis complex is not responsive to sirolimus. Pediatr Neurol. 42:443–6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kuhn JG, Chang SM, Wen PY, et al. Pharmacokinetic and tumor distribution characteristics of temsirolimus in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7401–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cloughesy TF, Yoshimoto K, Nghiemphu P, et al. Antitumor activity of rapamycin in a Phase I trial for patients with recurrent PTEN-deficient glioblastoma. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Franz DN, Leonard J, Tudor C, et al. Rapamycin causes regression of astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis complex. Ann Neurol. 2006;59:490–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.20784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu TJ, Koul D, LaFortune T, et al. NVP-BEZ235, a novel dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, elicits multifaceted antitumor activities in human gliomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:2204–10. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zou CY, Smith KD, Zhu QS, et al. Dual targeting of AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin: A potential therapeutic approach for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1157–68. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




