Abstract
Four hundred and fifty-eight genes coding for PentatricoPeptide Repeat (PPR) proteins are annotated in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Over the past 10 years, numerous reports have shown that many of these proteins function in organelles to target specific transcripts and are involved in post-transcriptional regulation. Therefore, they are thought to be important players in the coordination between nuclear and organelle genome expression. Only four of these proteins have been described to be addressed outside organelles, indicating that some PPRs could function in post-transcriptional regulations of nuclear genes.
In this work, we updated and improved our current knowledge on the localization of PPR proteins of Arabidopsis within the plant cell. We particularly investigated the subcellular localization of 166 PPR proteins whose targeting predictions were ambiguous, using a combination of high-throughput cloning and microscopy. Through systematic localization experiments and data integration, we confirmed that PPR proteins are largely targeted to organelles and showed that dual targeting to both the mitochondria and plastid occurs more frequently than expected. These results allow us to speculate that dual-targeted PPR proteins could be important for the fine coordination of gene expressions in both organelles.
Keywords: PPR proteins, organelle genome expression, Arabidopsis thaliana, targeting peptide, subcellular localization
Introduction
Plant nuclear genomes code for more than 99% of the 25000–30000 proteins required to build plant cells and tissues.1 These proteins are addressed to various cell compartments to ensure specific cellular processes. Two other small genomes, formed by primary endo-symbiosis events, which led to the organelle formation, are found in mitochondria and plastids.2 Throughout evolution, organelles have lost much of their original genomes by the transfer of genetic material to the nucleus. However, they have retained small genomes encoding key proteins and RNAs necessary for their biology. In Arabidopsis, 57 mitochondrial genes and 128 chloroplast genes have been annotated on the corresponding genomes (TAIRv10). The proteins encoded by these genes, acting together with nuclear imported proteins, play an important role in mitochondria and plastid functions.3,4 Many of the proteins encoded by genes transferred from organelles to the nucleus are important for organelle gene expression or metabolism and need to be targeted back to their original compartment. In addition, many other nuclearly encoded proteins have acquired functions in different steps of organelle biology. Overall, more than 3000 proteins encoded by the nuclear genome are predicted to be targeted to the organelles,5 creating a requirement for a coordinated regulation of nuclear and organellar gene expression and a precise control of protein addressing and import into the organelles. Several import systems exist in mitochondria and plastids where translocation is mediated mainly by co-translational and post-translational machineries. The main machineries are well known.6-8 They are named Translocase of the Outer/Inner Mitochondria membrane complexes (TOM/TIM) in mitochondria and Translocase of the Outer/Inner Chloroplast membrane complexes (TOC/TIC) in plastids. TOM/TIM and TOC/TIC account for the targeting of most organellar proteins. These two Translocase complexes share both similar structural conformations and import mechanisms with the recognition of a Targeting Peptide (TP) and the involvement of chaperones, receptor, and pore type proteins.8 Despite these similarities, the mechanisms of translocation are specific to each Translocase. For example, the translocation into plastids requires GTP hydrolysis whereas it is not the case in mitochondria.8
Organelle physiological processes are under the control of proteins expressed from distinct genomes suggesting a tight and complex coordination in gene expression and, therefore, intracellular signaling pathways between cell compartments. Whereas nuclear genes are largely regulated at the transcriptional level, organelle genes are often constitutively expressed but tightly regulated at post-transcriptional levels.9 Imported nuclear proteins are necessary for a wide range of organellar transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes, including RNA transcription, RNA processing, RNA editing, RNA splicing, and translation. Among these nuclear factors, the large family of PentatricoPeptide Repeat (PPR) proteins are emerging more and more as central actors of the inter-compartmental coordination of gene expression.10 As expected for proteins involved in complex genome regulations, they define one of the largest families encoded by the nuclear genome with 458 members in Arabidopsis, 477 in rice, and up to 800 in Selaginella moellendorffii.11-14
A typical PPR protein is constructed from a stretch (2–30) of 35-amino acid motifs (known as PPR motifs) often merged in N terminus with a targeting peptide thought to allow an organelle subcellular localization. Several studies confirmed that the targeting peptide is functional, suggesting that PPR proteins are massively targeted to mitochondria or plastids.10,11 Based on the PPR motif sequences and their relative serial organization, we proposed a classification of PPR proteins in two main subfamilies.11 In Arabidopsis, the largest one, named the P-type subfamily, contains 255 PPR proteins harboring tandem repeats of a simple canonical PPR motif (the P-type motif). The second one is known as the PLS-type subfamily and contains the remaining 203 PPR proteins.11 Their module-based structures but also biochemical and genetic data indicate that PPR proteins are able to interact in a sequence-specific way with organelle RNAs to assure various post-transcriptional functions.10,15 Recently, through computational and molecular biology approaches, a RNA recognition code was proposed for PPR proteins where two adjacent PPR motifs are able to recognize one specific nucleotide.16,17 The specificity of the base recognition is accomplished by the combination of three amino acids, two located in the first PPR motif (third and sixth positions) and the third at the first position in the subsequent PPR motif.16,17
PPR proteins have largely been associated with transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational regulation of organellar expression.10 A growing number of PPR proteins have been shown to be required for editing. For example, CHLORORESPIRATORY REDUCTION 4 (CRR4) is necessary for editing of the chloroplast ndhD transcript18 and MITOCHONDRIAL RNA EDITING FACTOR1 (MEF1) is required for editing of three mitochondrial transcripts.19 Arabidopsis PPR proteins are also involved in splicing of organelle transcripts: ORGANELLAR TRANSCRIPT PROCESSING43 (OPT43) and OTP51 are necessary for the correct trans-splicing of nad1 and cis-splicing of ycf3 transcripts, respectively.20,21 Finally, PPR proteins are involved in translation processes. For example, CHLOROPLAST RNA PROCESSING 1 (CRP1) has been proposed to be a chloroplast translation regulator22 and PPR336 is associated with mitochondrial polysomes.23 As expected with essential players in gene expression involved in respiration and photosynthesis, a large proportion of mutants in PPR genes are embryo or gametophyte lethal.11,24,25
Despite the growing PPR literature indicating that PPR proteins function mainly in organelles, some members could also have targets in the nucleus or the cytoplasm. In Arabidopsis, four PPR proteins were shown to be localized out of organelles. Two of them, PROTEINACEOUS RNase P 2 (PRORP2) and PRORP3, are localized exclusively in the nucleus where they are needed to achieve RNase P activity.26 The two others have a more complex subcellular localization with a dual targeting to both mitochondria and nucleus. The GLUTAMINE-RICH PROTEIN23 (GRP23) interacts in nucleus with RNA polymerase II but its nuclear and mitochondrial functions are not yet understood.27 Similarly, Hammani and co-workers showed that PPR PROTEIN LOCALIZED TO THE NUCLEUS AND MITOCHONDRIA1 (PNM1) is involved in protein translation in mitochondria whereas it physically interacts with two proteins in the nucleus, NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN1 and the transcription factor TCP8.28 In animals, one example of a PPR protein localized out of the organelles has also been reported but its localization is still a matter of debate. This PPR protein, named BICOID STABILIZATION FACTOR (BSF) in Drosophila, as well as Leucine-Rich Repeat PentatricoPeptide Repeat Cassette (LRPPRC) in humans, was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus of early Drosophila embryo cells29 with roles in transcription and RNA transport. Other authors showed the protein to be localized in mitochondria where it would be involved in mRNAs maturation, poly-adenylation, and translation.30
Only a handful of PPR proteins were shown to function out of organelles. Many post-transcriptional processes are being shared by both the organelles and nucleus; therefore, this number may be underestimated. In order to identify new Arabidopsis PPR proteins addressed out of the organelles but also to improve our general knowledge on PPR targeting, we systematically investigated the subcellular localization of a third of the PPR family whose addressing prediction was ambiguous. We took advantage of a high-throughput cloning strategy combined with a transient expression system to elucidate whether the N terminus targeting peptides of candidate PPR proteins were functional to address the protein into organelles. We report in this work that, despite erroneous predictions of subcellular localization, most PPR proteins are addressed to one of the organelles and showed that a fraction of them, probably underestimated, are addressed to both mitochondria and plastids.
Results
Localization study of PPR proteins with ambiguous predictions of localization
We previously published a manually curated list of Arabidopsis PPR gene models.12 When this work was initiated, the most accurate algorithms to predict subcellular localization of plant proteins were TargetP v1.0131 and Predotar v1.03.32 Therefore, we used them to identify Arabidopsis genes coding for PPR proteins with ambiguous localization predictions (Table 1). TargetP was recently improved with the TargetP v1.1 version of the software. Among the 458 PPR genes, Predotar predicts that 244 and 92 PPR proteins are addressed, respectively, to mitochondria and plastids, whereas 122 PPRs would not have any organelle localization (Table 2). TargetP v1.1 gives similar results with 232 and 123 PPRs localized to mitochondria and plastids, respectively, and 103 PPRs without organelle localizations (Table 1). Taken together, 166 PPR proteins were predicted not to be addressed to either of the two main plant organelles by at least one of the two software (Predotar v1.03 and TargetP v1.01). Among them, 53 PPR proteins were not predicted to be addressed in the organelles by both algorithms. We chose to experimentally investigate the subcellular localization of those 166 PPR proteins as they were good candidates to have atypical functions out of the organelles.
Table 1. Subcellular localization study of 166 PPR proteins with ambiguous prediction data.
| Gene model | Prediction | Fluorescent signal | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
TAIR v10 |
O'Toole |
|
Target P |
Predotar |
|
Targeting Peptide |
FL Protein |
Conclusion |
| At1g01970 |
AT1G01970.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
C |
C |
| At1g02420 |
AT1G02420.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At1g04840 |
AT1G04840.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g05670 |
|
AtPPR_1g05670 |
|
M |
none |
|
N/Ct |
M/C |
M/C |
| At1g06150 |
|
AtPPR_1g06150 |
|
C |
none |
|
N/Ct |
M/C |
M/C |
| At1g06580 |
AT1G06580.1 |
|
|
M |
ER |
|
N/Ct + M |
M/C |
M/C |
| At1g08610 |
AT1G08610.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g09190 |
AT1G09190.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g09410 |
AT1G09410.1 |
|
|
M |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
pM |
| At1g09900 |
AT1G09900.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g10270 |
AT1G10270.1 |
|
|
M |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g10330 |
AT1G10330.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g11290 |
AT1G11290.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g14470 |
AT1G14470.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g15480 |
|
AtPPR_1g15480 |
|
M |
ER |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g18485 |
AT1G18485.1 |
|
|
C |
ER |
|
N/Ct |
c.u. |
- |
| At1g19290 |
AT1G19290.1 |
|
|
M |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g19720 |
AT1G19720.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g20230 |
AT1G20230.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g22830 |
AT1G22830.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g25360 |
AT1G25360.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
M/C |
M/C |
| At1g31430 |
AT1G31430.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g31790 |
AT1G31790.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g31840 |
|
AtPPR_1g31840 |
|
ER |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g31920 |
AT1G31920.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g33350 |
AT1G33350.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g50270 |
AT1G50270.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g53330 |
AT1G53330.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
c.u. |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g56570 |
AT1G56570.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g59720 |
AT1G59720.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g60770 |
AT1G60770.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g62260 |
AT1G62260.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g62590 |
AT1G62590.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
M |
M |
| At1g63330 |
AT1G63330.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g63400 |
AT1G63400.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
M |
M |
| At1g64100 |
|
AtPPR_1g64100 |
|
C |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At1g68930 |
AT1G68930.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g69290 |
|
AtPPR_1g69290 |
|
ER |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g71490 |
AT1G71490.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At1g73710 |
AT1G73710.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At1g74400 |
AT1G74400.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M/C |
M |
M |
| At1g74580 |
AT1G74580.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g74630 |
AT1G74630.1 |
|
|
ER |
C |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At1g76280 |
|
AtPPR_1g76280 |
|
M |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g01360 |
|
AtPPR_2g01360 |
|
ER |
ER |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At2g01740 |
AT2G01740.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g02750 |
AT2G02750.1 |
|
|
M |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
pM |
| At2g04860 |
AT2G04860.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g06000 |
AT2G06000.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g13600 |
AT2G13600.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g15820 |
AT2G15820.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g15980 |
AT2G15980.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At2g16880 |
AT2G16880.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At2g20540 |
AT2G20540.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g21090 |
AT2G21090.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g22070 |
AT2G22070.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g26790 |
AT2G26790.1 |
|
|
M |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g27610 |
AT2G27610.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g28050 |
AT2G28050.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g32630 |
AT2G32630.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g33680 |
AT2G33680.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
c.u. |
n.a. |
- |
| At2g33760 |
AT2G33760.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g34400 |
AT2G34400.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At2g35130 |
|
AtPPR_2g35130 |
|
ER |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g36240 |
AT2G36240.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
M |
M |
| At2g36730 |
AT2G36730.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At2g37230 |
AT2G37230.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g37310 |
AT2G37310.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g39620 |
|
AtPPR_2g39620 |
|
M |
ER |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g40720 |
AT2G40720.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At2g41080 |
|
AtPPR_2g41080 |
|
C |
none |
|
M/C |
no signal |
m/c |
| At2g41720 |
AT2G41720.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At2g44880 |
AT2G44880.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
N/Ct |
M/C |
M/C |
| At2g45350 |
AT2G45350.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
c.u. |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g01580 |
AT3G01580.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g02010 |
AT3G02010.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g05240 |
AT3G05240.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g06920 |
AT3G06920.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g08820 |
AT3G08820.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M/C |
M |
M |
| At3g09060 |
AT3G09060.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g09650 |
AT3G09650.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g12770 |
AT3G12770.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g14330 |
AT3G14330.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g15130 |
AT3G15130.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g15930 |
AT3G15930.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g16610 |
AT3G16610.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g18840 |
AT3G18840.2 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
N/Ct |
c.u. |
- |
| At3g20730 |
|
AtPPR_3g20730 |
|
ER |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g21470 |
AT3G21470.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At3g23020 |
AT3G23020.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
c.u. |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g23330 |
AT3G23330.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At3g25970 |
AT3G25970.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g26540 |
AT3G26540.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g28640 |
AT3G28640.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g28660 |
AT3G28660.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g29290 |
|
AtPPR_3g29290 |
|
M |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g42630 |
AT3G42630.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g46610 |
AT3G46610.1 |
|
|
none |
ER |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g46790 |
AT3G46790.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g47530 |
AT3G47530.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
M/C |
M/C |
| At3g47840 |
AT3G47840.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g48810 |
AT3G48810.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M/C |
| At3g49240 |
AT3G49240.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
|
M/C |
| At3g49710 |
AT3G49710.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
N/Ct |
M/C |
M/C |
| At3g49740 |
AT3G49740.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g50420 |
AT3G50420.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
M/C |
M/C |
| At3g53170 |
|
AtPPR_3g53170 |
|
none |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g56550 |
AT3G56550.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At3g57430 |
AT3G57430.1 |
|
|
C |
ER |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At3g58590 |
AT3G58590.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At3g62890 |
|
AtPPR_3g62890 |
|
C |
none |
|
N/Ct |
M/C |
M/C |
| At4g01570 |
AT4G01570.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At4g02750 |
AT4G02750.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g04370 |
AT4G04370.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At4g08210 |
AT4G08210.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g11690 |
AT4G11690.1 |
|
|
ER |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g13650 |
AT4G13650.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
pM |
| At4g14820 |
AT4G14820.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g14850 |
AT4G14850.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At4g15720 |
AT4G15720.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At4g16470 |
AT4G16470.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g18840 |
|
AtPPR_4g18840 |
|
none |
C |
|
N/Ct |
C |
C |
| At4g20090 |
AT4G20090.1 |
|
|
C |
ER |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g20740 |
AT4G20740.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At4g21065 |
AT4G21065.1 |
|
|
ER |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At4g21880 |
AT4G21880.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g22760 |
AT4G22760.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g28010 |
AT4G28010.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g30700 |
AT4G30700.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M/C |
M/C |
M/C |
| At4g33170 |
AT4G33170.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At4g37170 |
AT4G37170.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At4g38010 |
AT4G38010.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g03800 |
AT5G03800.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At5g04810 |
AT5G04810.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g06540 |
AT5G06540.1 |
|
|
ER |
M |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g08310 |
|
AtPPR_5g08310 |
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g08490 |
AT5G08490.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g08510 |
AT5G08510.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g10690 |
AT5G10690.1 |
|
|
C |
ER |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g14080 |
|
AtPPR_5g14080 |
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At5g15300 |
AT5G15300.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g16860 |
AT5G16860.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g18475 |
AT5G18475.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g18950 |
AT5G18950.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g21222 |
AT5G21222.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At5g25630 |
|
AtPPR_5g25630 |
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g27270 |
AT5G27270.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g37570 |
AT5G37570.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g38730 |
AT5G38730.1 |
|
|
none |
C |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g39680 |
AT5G39680.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g40405 |
AT5G40405.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g43790 |
AT5G43790.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M/C |
c.u. |
m/c |
| At5g46100 |
AT5G46100.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g46680 |
AT5G46680.1 |
|
|
none |
M |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g47460 |
AT5G47460.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M/C |
M/C |
M/C |
| At5g48910 |
AT5G48910.1 |
|
|
C |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g50990 |
|
AtPPR_5g50990 |
|
none |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g52630 |
AT5G52630.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g55840 |
|
AtPPR_5g55840 |
|
none |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g56310 |
AT5G56310.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g59600 |
AT5G59600.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g5 9900 |
AT5G59900.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g65570 |
AT5G65570.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
no signal |
n.a. |
- |
| At5g65820 |
AT5G65820.1 |
|
|
M |
none |
|
M |
n.a. |
M |
| At5g66520 |
AT5G66520.1 |
|
|
none |
none |
|
C |
n.a. |
C |
| At5g67570 | AtPPR_5g67570 | none | none | no signal | n.a. | - | |||
Manually curated Arabidopsis PPR gene models were used.12 Most of them are identical to TAIR v10 gene models but 22 models are different and are indicated with their AtPPR codes. Predictions of localization using Predotar v1.03 and Target P v1.1 software are listed. Experimental fluorescent signals observed in protoplasts expressing Targeting Peptide or Full-Length (FL) protein fused to RFP are shown. Two independent observations by two of the authors were done on at least three independent agro-infiltrations. For each PPR, a tentative conclusion is proposed with the following rules: (1) if available, the observation of FL-protein fusion is considered as the true localization, (2) if a mitochondrial or a chloroplastic localization was observed for the targeting peptide and no observation was recorded for the full-length protein, the result of TP is indicated as conclusion, (3) if a dual localization was observed and no observation was obtained with the full-length protein, the result of TP is indicated as probable in lowercase, (4) if no experimental observation was obtained, the predicted localization is indicated with a preceding “p”., . M, mitochondria; C, chloroplasts; N/Ct, nucleus and cytoplasm; M/C, dual localization in mitochondria and chloroplasts; pM, predicted in mitochondria (conclusion column); pC, predicted in chloroplasts (conclusion column); m, probably in mitochondria (conclusion column); c, probably in chloroplasts (conclusion column); m/c, probably in mitochondria and chloroplasts (conclusion column); -, no conclusion; c.u., cloning unsuccessful; n.a., not attempted.
Table 2. Prediction and experimental localization data of Arabidopsis thaliana PPR proteins.
| |
|
|
Localization |
|
|
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGI | Gene Annotation1 | Domains2 | Predictions3 | Proteomics4 | Experimental5 | Conclusion6 | EMB7 | Molecular Function (localization)8 | References |
| At1g01970 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g02060 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g02150 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata,b,c, Zmc) |
|
C |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bKong et al 2011, cPPDB |
| At1g02370 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011 |
| At1g02420 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g03100 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
Ct (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aHummel et al 2012 |
| At1g03510 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g03540 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g03560 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g04840 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
PM (Ata) |
Cb |
- |
|
|
aMitra et al 2009, bthis report |
| At1g05600 |
EMB3101 |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
confirmeda |
|
aSeedGenes |
| At1g05670 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g05750 |
CLB19/PDE247 |
PLS-E |
c |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Editing rpoA and clpP (Ca) |
aChateigner-Boutin et al 2008, bin house SUBA3 |
| At1g06140 |
MEF3 |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
M |
|
Editing atp4 (Ma) |
aVerbistkiy et al 2012 |
| At1g06150 |
EMB1444 |
PLS-E |
C |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
potentialb |
|
athis report, bCushing et al 2005 |
| At1g06270 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
ER/Ca |
- |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At1g06580 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g06710 |
MTSF1 |
P |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Processing and stability of nad4 (Ma) |
aHaïli et al 2013 |
| At1g07590 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g07740 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g08070 |
OTP82 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing ndhG, ndhB (Cb,c) |
ain house SUBA3, bHammani et al 2009, cOkuda et al 2010 |
| At1g08610 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g09190 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g09220 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g09410 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
c |
|
|
|
| At1g09680 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At1g09820 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g09900 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
c |
C (Zma) |
Mb |
m/c |
|
|
aPPDB, bthis report |
| At1g10270 |
GRP23 |
P |
M |
|
Na, Mb,c |
M/N |
confirmedd |
|
aDing et al 2006, bNarsai et al 2011, cthis report, dSeedGenes |
| At1g10330 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g10910 |
EMB3103 |
P |
M |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bSeedGenes |
| At1g11290 |
CRR22 |
PLS-E-DYW |
c |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Editing ndhB, ndhD, rpoB (Cc) |
athis report, bin house SUBA3, cOkuda et al 2009 |
| At1g11630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et al 2004 |
| At1g11710 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g11900 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g12300 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g12620 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g12700 |
RPF1 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Processing nad4 transcript (Ma) |
aHolze et al 2011 |
| At1g12775 |
EMB1586 |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
confirmeda |
|
aSeedGenes |
| At1g13040 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
V (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aJaquinod et al 2007 |
| At1g13410 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g13630.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At1g13800 |
FAC19 |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
confirmeda |
|
aYu et al J 2011 |
| At1g14470 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
m |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g15480 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
M (Ata) PM (Atb) |
|
M |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011, bMitra et al 2009 |
| At1g15510 |
AtECB2 /VAC1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ca,b,c |
C |
|
Editing accD and ndhF (Cb,c) |
ain house SUBA3, bYu et al 2009, cTseng et al 2010 |
| At1g16480 |
pseudogene |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g16830 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g17630 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g18485 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g18900 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g19290 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Mab |
M |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At1g19520 |
NFD5 |
P |
M |
PM (Ata) |
|
pM |
potentialb |
|
aZhang et al 2011, bPortereiko et al 2006 |
| At1g19720 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
C (Ata,b, Zmb) |
Mc |
m/c |
|
|
aKong et al 2011, bPPDB, cthis report |
| At1g20230 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g20300 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At1g22830 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g22960 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g25360 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g26460 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b, Osc) PM (Atd) |
|
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011, cHuang et al 2009, dZhang et al 2011 |
| At1g26500 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g26900 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g28020 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g28690 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g29710 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g30290 |
pseudogene |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g30610 |
EMB2279 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bSeedGenes |
| At1g31430 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
c |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g31790 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
c |
|
Ca |
C |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g31840 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g31920 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At1g32415 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g33350 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g34160 |
OGR1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad4, nad2, ccmC, cox2, cox3 (Ma) |
aKim et al 2009 |
| At1g43010 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g43980 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g47580 |
DYW1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
c |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Editing ndhD (Ca) |
aBoussardon et al 2012, bin house SUBA3 |
| At1g50270 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g51965 |
ABO5 |
P |
M |
C (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
Splicing nad2 intron3 (Mb) |
aAT_Chloro,bLiu et al 2010 |
| At1g52620 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At1g52640 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g53330 |
CB_1265 |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
confirmeda |
|
aKocàbek et al 2006 |
| At1g53600 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g55630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g55890 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b) PM (Atc) |
|
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011, cMitra et al 2009 |
| At1g56570 |
PGN |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
aLaluk et al 2011, bthis report |
| At1g56690 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g59720 |
CRR28 |
PLS-E-DYW |
c |
|
Ma,Cb,c |
C |
|
Editing ndhB, ndhD (Cd) |
aLurin et al 2004, bin house SUBA3, cthis report, dOkuda et al 2009 |
| At1g60770 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
M (Ata,b, Osc) PM (Atd) |
Me |
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011, cHuang et al 2009, dMitra et al 2009, ethis report |
| At1g61870 |
PPR336 |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b,c) |
Md |
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et al 2004,bUyttewaal 2007, cKlodmann et al 2011, dLurin et al 2004 |
| At1g62260 |
MEF9 |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad7 (Mb) |
athis report, bTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At1g62350 |
THA8-LIKE3 |
P-D |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g62590 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g62670 |
RPF2 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Processing nad9 and cox3 (Ma) |
aJonietz et al 2010 |
| At1g62680 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g62720 |
AtNG1 |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aYang et al 2011 |
| At1g62910 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
PM (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aMitra et al 2009 |
| At1g62930 |
RPF3 |
P |
C |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Processing ccmC (Ma) |
aJonietz et al 2011 |
| At1g63070 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g63080 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g63130 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g63150 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g63320 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g63330 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g63400 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g64100 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
M (Ata) |
m/cb |
M/c |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011, bthis report |
| At1g64310 |
OTP71 |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma, M/Cb |
M/c |
|
Editing ccmFN2 (Ma) |
aChateigner-Boutin et al 2013, bin house SUBA3 |
| At1g64430 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g64580 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g66345 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g68930 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g68980 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g69290 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
PM (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
|
aLi et al 2012, bthis report |
| At1g69350 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At1g71060 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g71210 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g71420 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
Ct (Ata) |
|
c |
|
|
aHummel et al 2012 |
| At1g71460 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
C |
C (Ata, Zma) Ct(Atb) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bHummel et al 2012 |
| At1g71490 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g73400 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g73710 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g74400 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g74580 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At1g74600 |
OTP87 =OsPPR1 |
PLS-E |
C |
|
M/Ca |
M/c |
|
Editing nad7, atp1 (Ma) |
aHammani et al 2011 |
| At1g74630 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At1g74750 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g74850 |
PTAC2 |
P-D |
C |
C (Ata,b,c,d,e,f, Zmf) N (Atg) |
|
C |
confirmedc |
|
aKleffmann et al 2004, bAT_Chloro, cPfalz et al 2006, dKong et al 2011, eIngelsson et al 2012, fPPDB, gSakamoto et al 2013 |
| At1g74900 |
OTP43 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Splicing nad1 intron1 (Mb) |
ain house SUBA3, bde longevialle et al 2007 |
| At1g76280.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At1g77010 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g77170 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g77340 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g77360 |
APPR6 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Processing and translation stabilisation of rps3 (Ma) |
aManavski et al 2012 |
| At1g77405 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g79080 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At1g79490 |
EMB2217 |
P-D |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
potentialb |
|
aNarsai et al 2011, bSeedGenes |
| At1g79540 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g80150 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g80270.1 |
PPR_596 |
P |
M |
M(Ata, Osb) C (Atc) PM (Atd) |
Me |
M/c |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011, bHuang et al 2009, cFroehlich et al 2003, dZhang et al 2011, eNarsai et al 2011 |
| At1g80550 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At1g80880 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g01360 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At2g01390 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
confirmedb |
|
aLurin et al 2004, bSeedGenes |
| At2g01510 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g01740 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g01860 |
EMB975 |
P |
- |
|
Ca |
c |
confirmedb |
|
aLurin et al 2004, bSeedGenes |
| At2g02150 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At2g02750 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g02980 |
OTP85 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing ndhD (Cb) |
ain house SUBA3, bHammani et al 2009 |
| At2g03380 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g03880 |
REME1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
PM (Ata) |
Mb, Cc |
M |
|
Editing nad2, mttB (Mb) |
aAlexandersson et al 2004, bBentolila et al 2010, cLurin et al 2004 |
| At2g04860 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g06000.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g13420 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g13600 |
SLO2 |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
Editing mttB, nad1, nad4L, nad7, nad1 (Ma) |
aZhu et al 2012, bthis report |
| At2g15630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At2g15690 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
M (Osa) C( Zmb) |
M/Cc |
M/C |
|
|
aHuang et al 2009, bPPDB, cin house SUBA3 |
| At2g15820 |
OTP51 |
P |
M |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
C |
|
Splicing ycf3 intron2 (Cc) |
aPPDB, bthis report, cde longevialle et al 2008 |
| At2g15980 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At2g16650 |
PRORP2 |
P-D |
- |
|
Na |
N |
|
Processing tRNA and maturation of RNA (Nb) |
aGobert et al 2010, bGutmann et al 2012 |
| At2g16880 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g17033.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
M |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At2g17140 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g17210 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At2g17525 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g17670.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g18520 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011 |
| At2g18940 |
ZmPPR10 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
Translation stabilisation of atpI-AtpH and psaJ-rpl33 (Ca) |
aPfalz et al 2009 |
| At2g19280 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata) |
Ma |
M/c |
|
|
aPPDB, bLurin et al 2004 |
| At2g20540 |
MEF21 |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
Editing cox3 (Mc) |
aLurin et al 2004, bthis report, cTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At2g20710.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g21090 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g22070 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g22410 |
SLO1 |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad4, nad9 (Ma) |
aSung et al 2010 |
| At2g25580 |
MEF8 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
M |
|
Editing nad5, nad6 (Ma,b) |
aTakenaka et al 2010, bVervitskiy et al 2012 |
| At2g26790 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g27610 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
Ct (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
|
aHummel et al 2012, bthis report |
| At2g27800 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g28050 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata) |
Mb |
M/c |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bthis report |
| At2g29760 |
OTP81 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Editing rps12 (Cc) |
aLurin et al 2004, bin house SUBA3, cHammani et al 2009 |
| At2g30100 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At2g30780 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g31400 |
GUN1 |
P-D |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
|
|
aKoussevitzky et al 2007 |
| At2g32230 |
PRORP1 |
P-D |
M |
C (Zma) |
M/Cb |
M/C |
confirmedb |
Processing tRNA elements (M/Cb) |
aPPDB, bGobert et al 2010 |
| At2g32630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g33680 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At2g33760 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
c |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At2g34370 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004 |
| At2g34400 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g35030 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At2g35130 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
c |
|
|
aPPDB, bthis report |
| At2g36240 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g36730 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g36980 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g37230 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata,b) M(Osc) PM (Atd) |
Me |
M/c |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bPPDB, cHuang et al 2009, dZhang et al 2011, ethis report |
| At2g37310 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g37320 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g38420 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g39230 |
LOJ |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g39620 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g40240 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At2g40720 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g41080 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At2g41720.1 |
EMB2654 |
P |
- |
|
Ca |
c |
potentialb |
|
athis report, bSeedGenes |
| At2g42920 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At2g44880 |
AHG11 |
PLS-E |
- |
PM (Ata) |
Mb, M/Cc |
M/c |
|
Editing nad4 (Mb) |
aMitra et al 2009, bMurayama et al 2012, cthis report |
| At2g45350 |
CRR4 |
PLS-E |
- |
V (Ata) |
|
C |
|
Editing ndhD (Cb) |
aSzponarski et al 2004, bKotera et al 2004 |
| At2g46050 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At2g48000 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g01580 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
C (Ata) |
Mb |
M/c |
|
|
aKong et al 2011, bthis report |
| At3g02010 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004, bthis report |
| At3g02330 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At3g02490 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g02650 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g03580 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At3g04130.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g04750 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g04760 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Ata,b) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bKleffman et al 2004 |
| At3g05240 |
MEF19 |
PLS-E |
m |
|
|
M |
|
Editing ccb206 (Ma) |
aTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At3g05340 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g06430 |
EMB2750 /AtPPR2 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
Cb,c |
C |
|
Translation stabilisation (Cc,d) |
aPPDB, bin house SUBA3, cWilliams & Barkan 2003, dLu et al 2011 |
| At3g06920 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g07290 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g08820 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g09040 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g09060 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g09650 |
HCF152/CRM3 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
Cb,c |
C |
|
Processing petB (Cb) |
aPPDB, bMeierhoff et al 2003, cthis report |
| At3g11460 |
MEF10 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad2 (Mb) |
aLurin et al 2004, bHartel et al 2013 |
| At3g12770 |
MEF22 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
Ct (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
Editing nad3 (Mc) |
aHummel et al 2012, bthis report, cTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At3g13150 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At3g13160 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b,c) |
Md |
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et al 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011, cTaylor et al 2011, din house SUBA3 |
| At3g13770 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004 |
| At3g13880 |
OTP72 |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing rpl16 (Mb) |
aLurin et al 2004, bChateignier-Boutin et al 2013 |
| At3g14330 |
CREF3 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
m/C |
|
Editing psbE (Cb) |
athis report, bYagi et al 2013 |
| At3g14580 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g14730 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At3g15130 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma, M/Cb |
M/c |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g15200 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g15590 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b,c) |
|
M |
|
|
aBrugiere et al 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011, cTaylor et al 2011 |
| At3g15930 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g16010 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g16610 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g16710 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g16890 |
PPR40 |
P |
M |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
aZsigmond et al 2008, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g18020 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g18110 |
EMB1270 |
P-D |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bSeedGenes |
| At3g18840 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At3g18970 |
MEF20 |
PLS-E |
M |
C (Ata) |
|
M/c |
|
Editing rps4 (Mb) |
aAT_Chloro, bTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At3g20730 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g21470 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g22150 |
MPR25 |
PLS-E |
C |
C (Ata) |
Mb, Cc |
M/c |
|
Editing nad5 (Mb) |
aAT_Chloro, bToda et al 2012, cin house SUBA3 |
| At3g22470 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g22670 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g22690 |
YS1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing rpoB (Ca) |
aZhou et al 2008 |
| At3g23020 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
C (Ata,b) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB, bKleffman et al 2004 |
| At3g23330 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g24000 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004 |
| At3g25060 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g25210 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At3g25970 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g26540 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g26630 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At3g26782 |
MEF14 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
Editing matR (Mb) |
aHeazlewood et al 2004, bVerbitskiy et al 2011 |
| At3g27750 |
EMB3123/THA8 |
P-D |
C |
C (Ata) |
Cb |
C |
|
Splicing ycf3 intron 2 and trnA (Cb) |
aPPDB, bKhrouchtchova et al 2012 |
| At3g28640 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
c |
|
|
|
| At3g28660 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At3g29230 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
C |
C (Ata) |
Cb |
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g29290 |
EMB2076 |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
potentiala |
|
aSeedGenes |
| At3g42630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Ata,b, Zma) |
Cc |
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bKleffman et al 2004, cthis report |
| At3g46610 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bthis report |
| At3g46790 |
CRR2 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Processing ndhB (Cc) |
athis report, bin house SUBA3, cHashimoto et al 2003 |
| At3g46870 |
THA8-LIKE2 |
P |
M |
C (Ata,b) PM (Atc) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB, bKleffman et al 2004, cMitra et al 2009 |
| At3g47530 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g47840 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g48250 |
BIR6 |
P |
C |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Splicing nad7 intron1 (Ma) |
aKoprivova et al 2010 |
| At3g48810 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g49140 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
C (Ata,b) |
|
c |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bPPDB |
| At3g49170 |
EMB2261 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
confirmedb |
|
ain house SUBA3, bSeedGenes |
| At3g49240 |
EMB1796 |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b) C (Atc, Zmc) PM (Atd) |
M/Ce |
M/C |
confirmedf |
|
aIto et al 2006, bKlodmann 2011, cPPDB, dZhang et al 2011, ethis report, fSeedGenes |
| At3g49710 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g49730 |
Zmempp4 orthologous 1 |
P |
- |
|
M (Zma) |
M |
|
|
aGutierrez-marcos et al 2007 |
| At3g49740 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g50420 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g51320 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g53170 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
N (Ata) C (Zmb) |
C |
n/C |
|
|
aPendle et al 2005, bPPDB |
| At3g53360 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g53700 |
MEE40 |
P |
- |
C (Ata, Zma) |
|
C |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bPagnussat et al 2005 |
| At3g54980 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g56030 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g56550 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g57430 |
OTP84 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
PM (Ata) |
Cb,c |
C |
|
Editing psbZ, ndhB, ndhF (Cd) |
aLi et al 2012, bthis report, cin house SUBA3, dHammani et al 2009 |
| At3g58590 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At3g59040.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At3g60050 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g60960 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et al 2004 |
| At3g60980 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g61170 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g61360 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g61520 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g62470 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g62540 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At3g62890 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
M/Ca, Cb |
m/C |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At3g63370 |
OTP86 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing rps14 (Cb) |
ain house SUBA3, bHammani et al 2009 |
| At4g01030 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At4g01400.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
M |
PM (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aMitra et al 2009 |
| At4g01570 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g01990 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g02750 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma,b |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004, bthis report |
| At4g02820 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At4g04370 |
PPR containing.protein. |
PLS-E |
m |
|
M/Ca,b |
M/C |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g04790 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g08210 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g11690 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
m |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g13650 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g14050 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g14170 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g14190 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g14820 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g14850 |
LOI1/MEF11 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma, M/Cb |
M/c |
|
Editing cox3, nad4, ccb203 (Mc) |
aTang et al 2010, bthis report, cVerbitskiy et al 2010 |
| At4g15720 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g16390 |
SVR7 /RNA binding P67 |
P-D |
C |
C (Ata,b, Zmb) |
Cc,d |
C |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bPPDB, cLurin et al 2004, dLiu et al 2010 |
| At4g16470 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g16835 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g17616 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g17910 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g18520 |
PDM1 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
Processing rpoA transcript (Cb) |
aPPDB, bHao et al 2010 |
| At4g18750 |
DOT4 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g18840 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ca,b |
c |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g18975.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At4g19191 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g19220 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g19440 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At4g19900 |
Glycosyl transferase-related |
P-D |
m |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g20090 |
EMB1025 |
P |
c |
|
Ma,b |
M |
confirmedc |
|
aLurin et al 2004, bthis report, cSeedGenes |
| At4g20740 |
EMB3131 |
P |
c |
PM (Ata) |
Cb |
C |
confirmedc |
|
aLi et al 2012, bthis report, cSeedGenes |
| At4g20770 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g21065.1 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At4g21170 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
M/Ca |
M/C |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At4g21190 |
EMB1417 |
P |
M |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bSeedGenes |
| At4g21300 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
C |
|
|
aPPDB, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g21705 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g21880 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g21900 |
PRORP3 |
P-D |
- |
|
Na |
N |
|
Processing tRNA and maturation of RNA (Nb) |
aGobert et al 2010, bGutmann et al 2012 |
| At4g22760 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g25270 |
OTP70 |
PLS-E |
C |
|
Ca,b |
C |
|
Splicing rpoC1 intron (Ca) |
aChateigner-Boutin et al 2011, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g26680 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g26800 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g28010 |
RFP5 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
processing nad6, atp9, 26S rRNA (Mb) |
athis report, bHauler et al 2013 |
| At4g30700 |
MEF29/ ZmPPR2263 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
M/Ca |
M/c |
|
Editing nad5, cob (Ma) |
aSosso et al 2012 |
| At4g30825 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At4g31070 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g31850 |
PGR3 |
P |
- |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Translation stabilisation petL and ndhA (Cb,c) |
aLurin et al 2004, bYamazaki et al 2004, cCai et al 2011 |
| At4g32430 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g32450 |
MEF8S |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad5, nad6 (Mb) |
ain house SUBA3, bVervitskiy et al 2012 |
| At4g33170 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
M/Ca,b |
M/C |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At4g33990 |
EMB2758 |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
potentiala |
|
aSeedGenes |
| At4g34830 |
MRL1 |
P |
C |
C (Ata,b) PM (Atc) |
|
C |
|
Processing stabilisation rbcL (Cd) |
aPPDB, bAT_Chloro, cLi et al 2012, dJohnson et al 2010 |
| At4g35130 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At4g35850 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b,c,d, Ose) |
|
M |
|
|
aMillar et al 2001, bHeazlewood et al 2004, cKlodmann et al 2011, dTaylor et al 2011, eHuang et al 2009 |
| At4g36680 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata,b) |
|
M |
|
|
aHeazlewood et 2004, bKlodmann et al 2011 |
| At4g37170 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At4g37380 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At4g38010 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g38150.1 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
M (Ata) |
|
m |
|
|
aTaylor et al 2011 |
| At4g39530 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At4g39620 |
EMB2453 /ZmPPR5 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
confirmedb |
splicing trnG (Cc) |
aPPDB, bSeedGenes, cBeick et al 2008 |
| At4g39952 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g01110 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At5g02830 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At5g02860 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
potentialb |
|
aPPDB, bMyouga et al 2010 |
| At5g03560.2 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g03800 |
EMB175 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
C (Zma) PM (Atb) |
M/Cc,d |
m/C |
confirmede |
|
aPPDB, bKeinath et al 2010, cin house SUBA3, dthis report, eSeedGenes |
| At5g04780 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
C (Ata) |
|
c |
|
|
aKleffman et al 2004 |
| At5g04810 |
ZmPPR4 |
P-D |
C |
C (Ata,c) |
Cb |
C |
|
Splicing rps12 intron1 (Cc) |
aPPDB, bthis report, cSchmitz-linneweber et al 2006 |
| At5g06540 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ca, M/Cb |
m/c |
|
|
athis report, bin house SUBA3 |
| At5g08310 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g08490 |
SLG1 |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad3 (Ma) |
aYuan & Liu 2012 |
| At5g08510 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g09450 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011 |
| At5g09950 |
MEF7 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ma |
M |
|
Editing nad2, nad4L, cob, ccb206 (Mb) |
aLurin et al 2004, bZehrmann et al 2012 |
| At5g10690 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
- |
Ct (Ata) |
Cb |
C |
|
|
aIto et al 2011, bthis report |
| At5g11310 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g12100 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) |
|
M |
|
|
aTan et al 2009 |
| At5g13230 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004 |
| At5g13270 |
RARE1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing accD (Cb) |
aLurin et al 2004, bRobbins et al 2009 |
| At5g13770 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At5g14080 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Ata) |
m/cb |
m/C |
|
|
aPPDB, bthis report |
| At5g14770 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
PM (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
|
aLi et al 2012, bLurin et al 2004 |
| At5g14820 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g15010 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At5g15280 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g15300 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
PM (Ata) |
|
- |
|
|
aMitra et al 2009 |
| At5g15340 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aLurin et al 2004 |
| At5g15980 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
M (Ata) PM (Atb) |
|
M |
|
|
aKlodmann et al 2011, bZhang et al 2011 |
| At5g16420 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g16640 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g16860 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g18390 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g18475 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g18950 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g19020 |
MEF18 |
PLS-E |
C |
|
|
M |
|
Editing nad4 (Ma) |
aTakenaka et al 2010 |
| At5g21222 |
AtC401 |
P-D |
- |
C (Ata) |
m/cb |
m/C |
|
|
aPPDB, bthis report |
| At5g24830 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g25630 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At5g27110 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At5g27270 |
EMB976 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
Cb |
C |
potentialc |
|
aPPDB, bthis report, cSeedGenes |
| At5g27460 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g28460 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g36300 |
pseudogene |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g37570 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g38730 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g39350 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
ain house SUBA3 |
| At5g39680 |
EMB2744 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ma,b |
m |
potentialc |
|
aLurin et al 2004, bin house SUBA3, cSeedGenes |
| At5g39710 |
EMB2745 |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
potentialb |
|
aNarsai et al 2011, bSeedGenes |
| At5g39980 |
EMB3140 |
P |
- |
C (Zma) |
|
c |
confirmedb |
|
aPPDB, bSeedGenes |
| At5g40400 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g40405 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g40410 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
C (Ata,b) |
|
c |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bKong et al 2011 |
| At5g41170 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g42310 |
Ortholog of Z. Mays CRP1 |
P |
M |
C (Ata) |
|
C |
|
Translation stabilisation petA and psaC (Cb,c) |
aPPDB, bFisk et al 1999, cSchmitz-linneweber et al 2005 |
| At5g42450 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g43790 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
m/ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g43820 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g44230 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At5g46100 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g46460 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g46580 |
PPR containing protein |
P-D |
C |
C (Ata,b, Zmb) |
|
C |
|
|
aAT_Chloro, bPPDB |
| At5g46680 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
PM (Ata) |
Mb |
M |
|
|
aLi et al 2012, bthis report |
| At5g47360 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g47460 |
PPR containing.protein. |
PLS-E |
M |
|
M/Ca |
m/c |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g48730 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
C (Zma) |
|
C |
|
|
aPPDB |
| At5g48910 |
LPA66 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca,c, Mb |
m/C |
|
Editing psbF (Cc) |
athis report, bin house SUBA3, cCai et al 2009 |
| At5g50280 |
EMB1006 |
P |
C |
C (Zma) PM (Atb) |
|
C |
potentialc |
|
aPPDB, bMitra et al 2009, cSeedGenes |
| At5g50390 |
EMB3141 |
PLS-E-DYW |
C |
|
Ca |
C |
potentialb |
|
ain house SUBA3, bSeedGenes |
| At5g50990 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g52630 |
MEF1 |
PLS-E-DYW |
c |
|
Ca, Mb |
M |
|
Editing rps4, nad7, nad2 (Mc) |
aLurin et al 2004, bthis report, cZehrmann et al 2009 |
| At5g52850 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
| At5g55740 |
CRR21 |
PLS-E |
C |
|
Ma,Cb |
C |
|
Editing ndhD (Cc) |
aLurin et al 2004, bin house SUBA3, cOkuda et al 2007 |
| At5g55840 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
- |
|
Ma |
m |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g56310 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g57250 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g59200 |
OTP80 |
PLS-E |
c |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing rpl23 (Cb) |
ain house SUBA3, bHammani et al 2009 |
| At5g59600 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
- |
|
Ca |
c |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g59900 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
athis report |
| At5g60960 |
PNM1 |
P |
M |
M (Osa) |
M/Nb, Mc |
M/N |
confirmedb |
|
aHuang et al 2009, bHamanni et al 2011, cNarsai et al 2011 |
| At5g61370 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
Ma |
M |
|
|
aNarsai et al 2011 |
| At5g61400 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g61800 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
PM (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aLi et al 2012 |
| At5g61990 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g62370 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g64320 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g65560 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g65570 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E-DYW |
m |
PM (Ata) |
|
pM |
|
|
aMitra et al 2009 |
| At5g65820 |
Zmempp4 ortholog 2 |
P |
M |
|
M (Zma, Atb) |
M |
|
|
aGutierrez-marcos et al 2007, bthis report |
| At5g66500 |
PPR containing protein |
PLS-E |
M |
|
|
pM |
|
|
|
| At5g66520 |
CREF7 |
PLS-E-DYW |
- |
|
Ca |
C |
|
Editing ndhB(Cb) |
athis report, bYagi et al 2013 |
| At5g66631 |
PPR containing protein |
P |
C |
|
|
pC |
|
|
|
| At5g67570 | EMB1408/DG1/ZmPPR8852 | P | - | C (Zma) | Cb | C | aPPDB, bChi et al 2008 | ||
Functional annotations were obtained from TAIR web site using the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (AGI) genome release ver10. ABO5, ABA OVERLAY-SENSITIVE; AtECB, EARLY CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS; BIR, BSO-INSENSITIVE-ROOTS; CLB, CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESI; CREF, CHLOROPLAST RNA EDITING FACTOR; CRR, CHLORORESPIRATORY REDUCTION; DG, DELAYED GREENING; DOT, DEFECTIVELY ORGANIZED TRIBUTARIES; EMB, EMBRYO DEFECTIVE; FAC, EMBRYONIC FACTOR; GRP, GLUTAMINE-RICH PROTEIN; GUN, GENOME UNCUPLED; HCF, HIGH CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; LOI, LOVASTATINE INSENSITIVE; LOJ, LATERAL ORGAN JUNCTION; LPA, LOW PSII ACCUMULATION; MEF, MITOCONDRIAL RNA EDITING FACTOR; MPR25, MITOCHONDRIAL PPR 25; MTSF, MITOCHONDRIAL STABILITY FACTOR; NFD, NUCLEAR FUSION DEFECTIVE; OGR1, OPAQUE AND GROWTH RETARDATION; OTP, ORGANELLE TRANSCRIPT PROCESSING, PDE: PIGMENT DEFECTIVE; PDM, PIGMENT DEFICIENT MUTANT; PGN, PENTATRICOPEPTIDE GERMINATION ON NaCl; PGR, PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION; PNM, PROTEIN LOCALIZED TO THE NUCLEUS AND MITOCHONDRIA; PPR, PENTATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT; PRORP, PROTEINACEUS RNASE P; PTAC, PLASTID TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVE; REME, REQUIERED FOR EFFICENCY OF MITOCHONDRIAL EDITING; RPF, RNA PROCESSING FACTOR; SLG, SLOW GROWTH; SVR, SUPRESSOR OF VARIEGATION; VAC, VANILLA CREAM; YS, YELLOW SEEDLING; Zmempp, Z. mays EMPTY PERICARP, ZmPPR, Zea mays PPR. (2) PPR domains were recovered from FLAGdb++ v5 (http://urgv.evry.inra.fr/projects/FLAGdb++/HTML/index.shtml) and from manually curated published evidences. Domain identifiers are according to Lurin and co-workers:11 “P” for PPR P-type domains, “P-D” for PPR P-type with additional atypical domain, “PLS” for PPR PLS-type domains, “PLS-E” for PPR PLS-type with an E- or EE+- type additional domain, and “PLS-E-DYW” for PPR PLS-type containing EE+ and DYW additional domains. (3) Localization predictions were aggregated from the independent predictions provided by the following software: Predotar v1.03, TargetP server v1.1, iPSORT, Multi Loc, LocTree, and AtsubP server with the complete Arabidopsis proteome using default settings. The rules to propose a conclusive prediction were as follows: if four or more software give the same prediction, this prediction is proposed and noted in uppercase; if three software give the same prediction and the three others do not predict any localization, the prediction is proposed and noted in uppercase; if two software give the same prediction and the four others do not predict any localization, the prediction is proposed and noted in lowercase; if three software give the same prediction and another predict a different localization, the main prediction is proposed and noted in lowercase; in the other cases, no prediction is proposed (-). (4) Proteomic localizations were gathered from published studies and from organelle proteomic databases as indicated in corresponding references in the last column of the table. Additional information in brackets states in which specie(s) the proteomic investigation was (were) performed: “At” stands for Arabidopsis thaliana, “Zm” for Zea mays, and “Os” for Oriza sativa. (5) Experimental localizations of fluorescent proteins were collected from targeted published studies and systematic approaches,11,57 this report, unpublished data from SUBA3 either using targeting peptides or full-length proteins. (6) Conclusion column gives a probable subcellular localization by integrating prediction, proteomic, genetics, and fluorescent proteins data. The decision rule is as follows: reverse genetics is prevalent followed by fluorescent proteins, proteomic data, and prediction. The conclusion is indicated in uppercase if reverse genetics data is available, if two experimental results are identical, or if the experimental data fit with the prediction. If not, the conclusion is indicated in lowercase. If only predictions are available, the predicted localization is indicated with a preceding “p”. (7) Data of PPR Embryo defective mutants (EMB) was obtained from SeedGenes database (http://www.seedgenes.org/index.html) and manually curated mutants from published studies. (8) Molecular function based on reverse genetics approaches were obtained from literature, the localization of the molecular function is indicated in brackets. Localization data is indicated as followed. M, mitochondria; C, chloroplasts; N, nucleus; V, vacuole; Ct, cytosol; PM, plasma membrane. N/Ct, nucleus and cytoplasm; M/C, mitochondria and chloroplasts; lower case, “probably”; “pX”, predicted in compartment X (conclusion column).
Almost all the proteins addressed to organelles contain a targeting peptide in their N terminus extremity, which is cleaved during the transfer through the organelle membranes.8 A mitochondrial Targeting Peptide (mTP) is typically 40–50 amino acid long,33-36 whereas a chloroplast Targeting Peptide (cTP) is usually up to 60 amino acid long.37 To assess the targeting peptide functionality, we systematically merged in frame the first 300 bp, coding for the first 100 amino acids of each candidate PPR ORFs to the Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP) coding sequence using the Gateway technology. The aim of this approach was to experimentally detect any mTP or cTP present in the first 100 amino acids but not recognized by the prediction software. Vector cloning based on Gateway recombination technology was successful for 162 genes (97%). After agro-infiltration of Nicotiana benthamania leaves with these constructs and subsequent protoplasts preparation, we were able to detect RFP signals for 131 constructs (79%) using either epifluorescent or confocal microscope. All localization experiments were repeated at least three times and observed independently by two of the authors. Table 1 summarizes all predicted and experimental data obtained during this study. Presented in Figure 1A are examples of typical subcellular localizations observed using 300 bp constructs. In Figure 1, RFP fluorescence was visualized using a confocal microscope and compared with the distribution of the mitochondrion-specific probe MitoTracker Green and the chlorophyll autofluorescence. In the overlay panels, combined fluorescence from RFP (in red), MitoTracker (in green), and chlorophyll autofluorecence (in blue) appears in yellow when RFP signal co-localizes with MitoTracker staining indicating a localization of the fusion protein in mitochondria whereas it appears in violet when RFP signal is localized in plastids. It was detected that 68 and 31 300 bp-PPR constructs gave an exclusive mitochondrial and plastid localization, respectively, as exemplified by AT3G15130 and AT3G46610 in Figure 1A. Interestingly, 24 constructs exhibited a signal in both organelles (see for example, AT2G36240 and AT5G47460 in Fig. 1A) and nine constructs gave localizations out of organelles, appearing as typical nuclear and cytosolic signals (AT1G06150 and AT1G06580 in Fig. 1A). These localization results in the nucleus and the cytosol of the protoplasts suggest that the first 100 amino acids of these proteins do not code for a functional peptide targeting to organelles and that the RFP fusion proteins are localized where the translation occurs (in the cytosol) and in the nucleus by passive diffusion of small proteins through nuclear pores.
Figure 1. Examples of typical sub-cellular localizations observed using confocal microscopy. Confocal images of protoplasts obtained from Nicotiana benthamiana leaves infiltrated with constructs containing (A) the first 300 bp, coding for the first 100 amino acids, of six PPR ORFs, fused to the RFP coding sequence (TP-RFP) or (B) the full-length sequence of four PPR ORFs fused to the RFP coding sequence (FL-RFP). The RFP fluorophore (in red), the MitoTracker Green staining (in green), and the chlorophyll autofluorescence (in blue) were simultaneously visualized. Overlay panels show combined fluorescence from RFP, MitoTracker, and chlorophyll autofluorecence. Loc, deduced subcellular localization; M, mitochondria; C, chloroplasts; N/Ct, nucleus and cytosol; M/C, mitochondria and chloroplasts. Bars: 10 μm.
As addressing signals could be outside the first 100 amino acids and because using the first 100 amino acids may induce addressing artifacts, we decided to investigate in more detail the subcellular localization of the 33 PPR proteins that did not show a simple single organellar localization. Out of the 24 PPR proteins localized in both organelles and the nine proteins appearing outside of the organelles, we successfully cloned the whole ORFs and created RFP fusions for 19. Subcellular localizations of these fusions were monitored using Agro-infiltrated N. benthamiana-derived protoplasts observed under epifluorescent and confocal microscope (examples in Fig. 1B). Results are summarized in Table 1. We confirmed the dual subcellular localization for six out of the 11 ORFs successfully expressed and encoding full-length proteins thought to be addressed in both organelles (see AT5G47460 in Fig. 1B for example). As for AT2G36240 (Fig. 1B), we showed a single localization in mitochondria for the other five. Among the nine PPR proteins thought to be out of the organelles on the base of the first 100 amino acids, seven ORFs were successfully cloned but no cytosolic localization was confirmed: the whole proteins fused to RFP were systematically addressed to one or both organelles, as exemplified by AT1G06150 and AT1G06580 in Figure 1B. Surprisingly, six of them were localized in both organelles (AT1G06150 in Fig. 1B). Altogether, 12 PPRs proteins were verified as being localized in both mitochondria and plastids using the full-length protein.
Integrative overview of the subcellular localizations of PPR protein family
In order to provide a general overview of the localization of the whole PPR protein family, we aggregated our results concerning one-third of the family, with all available data from published studies and accessible databases (Table 2).
We first re-examined the localization prediction of the 458 PPR proteins encoded in the Arabidopsis genome using six available bio-informatics prediction tools: Predotar,32 TargetP,31 iPSORT,38 Loctree,39 Multiloc,40 and AtSubP.41 Despite using distinct algorithms, those tools largely provide similar results and Table 2 gives a single localization prediction aggregating the six software results following a rule emphasized in the caption of Table 2. Overall, 65% and 17% of the PPR proteins are predicted to function in mitochondria and in plastids, respectively. For 18%, the results are unclear either because a majority of the software was unable to provide an organellar prediction or because they provide overmuch diverging organellar predictions.
We also added the growing data coming from the proteomics identification of organelle proteins in Arabidopsis mitochondria (SUBA35) and chloroplast (SUBA3,5 AT_Chloro,42 PPDB43), also including localization data obtained from maize chloroplast (PPDB43) and rice mitochondria,44 according to the recent concept of orthoproteomics.45 As published,12 a very good level of orthology observed between the members of PPR families in A. thaliana and Oriza sativa suggests that both their function and their subcellular localization are largely conserved between species even between monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Overall, 83 (about 18%) of the Arabidopsis PPR proteins, or PPR orthologs in other species, were identified either in the plastidial or the mitochondrial proteomes, providing a very useful set of PPR protein localization data (Table 2). Three and five PPR proteins were identified during proteomics characterization of Arabidopsis nuclear and cytosolic proteins, respectively.46-49 Surprisingly, 28 PPR proteins were characterized in plasma membrane or vacuole extracts.50-56 Without functional characterization of any of these membrane PPR proteins, these observations cannot be solved. They may be due to intrinsic technical limitations of proteomics approaches; in contrast, their number may indicate unsuspected localizations and functions. However, proteome-based localizations validate many of the prediction results of bio-informatics software as 48 (71%) of them matched the available predictions (Table 3).
Table 3. Correlations between localization data sets.
| Data sets (number of PPR proteins with data in this set) |
Fusion proteins |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This study (126) | All data (208) |
Proteomics (84) | Reverse genetics (68) |
|
| Predictions (377) |
70/87 (80%) |
135/159 (85%) |
48/68 (71%) |
44/55 (80%) |
| Reverse genetics (68) |
17/18 (94%) |
53/57 (93%) |
12/15 (80%) |
|
| Proteomics (84) | 15/19 (79%) | 30/36 (83%) | ||
In each cell of the table, the number and the percent of compatible localizations among the intersection of data available in both data sets are indicated. Two results are considered as compatible when their localizations are coherent: for example, experimental localization in both organelles and prediction or proteomics indicating only one of the two organelles.
A growing number of PPR proteins were subjected to in planta functional characterization either in dedicated studies (see references in Table 2) or in systematic studies including the work reported here and three previous ones11,57unpublished data in SUBA3 (Table 2). Authors usually characterized localizations by microscopy using fusions between PPR proteins or, if suspected, putative targeting peptides and a fluorescent reporter. Including the work reported here, 208 PPR localizations were experimentally determined using fluorescent fusion proteins, largely correlating with both bio-informatics and proteomics approaches (Table 2 and 3). Among the 159 PPRs proteins for which both experimental localization data based on protein fusion and predictions using bio-informatics tools are available, 135 (85%) have a similar localization. In addition, among the 36 PPR proteins being both identified in sub-proteomes and subjected to experimental localization studies using fluorescent protein fusion, 30 (83%) were compatible. The last set of data comes from the identification of the molecular functions of PPR proteins using reverse genetics, providing very important data about their localization (Table 2). As largely reported in the literature, PPR proteins are involved in regulating gene expression by acting through direct interaction with specific RNAs. A literature survey indicates that molecular roles were assigned to 68 PPR proteins (Table 2), occurring in plastids (31), in mitochondria (34), in both mitochondria and plastids (1), or in the nucleus (2). These reverse genetics studies are very strong statements of PPR localization, which could be considered as true localization. When compared with this very high quality data set, our data as well as all data of fluorescent protein localization appeared as very highly correlated with 17 out of 18 (94%) and 53 out of 57 (93%) compatible localization, respectively (Table 3).
As concluded in Table 2 and taking into account all the above depicted approaches, we assigned all Arabidopsis PPR proteins a probable localization depending on the strength of the available data. The localization based on reverse genetics, when available, prevailed over any other approaches. Because we showed that the experimental localizations of fusion proteins were highly correlated with the localization of the molecular function when identified (Table 3), this data prevailed over the proteomics and bio-informatics ones. Additionally, PPR protein identification in organellar proteomes, though showing some discrepancies with functional data suggesting some errors of localization linked to this technique, was as far as we know more trustable that bio-informatics predictions. Finally, when no experimental data was available, we proposed a predicted localization in mitochondria or chloroplast (pM or pC). Figure 2 gives a graphical view of these results. The number of PPR proteins with a suspected or proved subcellular localization in at least one of the two organelles increased significantly with our study. For example, the experimental mitochondrial and chloroplast localization data increased by 50% (from 134 to 212) and with the addition 19 PPRs with experimental dual targeting to mitochondria and chloroplast to the previously 10 known. Overall, 275 PPR proteins (60%) are expected to function in mitochondria, with 44% of them being validated in experimental studies. Additionally, 109 PPR proteins (24%) are expected to function in plastids, 82% being demonstrated experimentally. Forty-five PPR proteins (10%) are suspected to have a dual addressing to both plastids and mitochondria. Finally, five PPR proteins have been shown to have atypical localization: PROPR2 and PROPR3 were shown to be addressed to the nucleus,58 PNM1 and GRP23 to both nucleus and mitochondria,27,28,57 and AT3G53170 was observed in both nuclear and chloroplastic extracts during proteomics studies.48,59 Only 24 PPR proteins (5%) do not have any clear localization based on experimental or bio-informatics reported investigations.

Figure 2. Distribution of the localization of Arabidopsis thaliana PentatricoPeptide Repeat (PPR) proteins. Classes of localization and percentage of each class in the PPR family are shown. pM, predicted mitochondria localization in dark red; M, mitochondria localization in light red; pC, predicted plastid localization in dark green; C, plastid localization in light green; M/C, mitochondria and plastid localization in yellow; N/C, nuclear and chloroplastic localization in black; M/N, mitochondria and nuclear localization in blue; N, nuclear localization in pink, unclear localization in light gray.
Discussion
RFP fusions with PPR-targeting peptides allowed us to study the subcellular localization of many members of the PPR family
Our aim in this study was to clarify the subcellular localization of 166 members of the large PPR family selected to have ambiguous localization predictions when we started the approach. In order to determine this, we used a strategy of high-throughput gateway cloning of the first 300 bp of PPR ORFs (corresponding to the N-terminal 100 amino acids of proteins) combined to a systematic microscopy investigation of the localization of transiently expressed RFP-tagged proteins. When it was determined that the first 100 amino acids displayed an interesting localization pattern, we performed in a second step a similar study using the whole ORF. Overall, with this work, we provided experimental information on the localization of 131 PPR proteins.
We have shown that 129 PPR proteins have functional targeting peptides able to address the RFP protein in one or both organelles. Seventeen have been previously published in dedicated studies and were shown to localize in agreement with our systematic results (Table 2 and 3).19,21,60-71 Additionally, 15 PPR proteins (HCF152 and OTP51 included) were identified in the same compartment using untargeted proteomic approaches (Table 2 and 3).44,59,72-76 These independent localization results largely validate our systematic strategy.
The strategy we used to study the localization of proteins can be performed at large scale to provide rapid functional information for organellar proteins. Nonetheless, some limitations have to be kept in mind when considering the results: first of all, the use of Nicotiana benthamiana is convenient as leaves are very comfortable to work with, but the evolution of addressing signals might be slightly different in distinct dicotyledonous species, explaining some discrepancies in the results. Second of all, the agro-infiltration to transform plant cells and generation of protoplasts to visualize expression are two steps known to generate stresses which, in some cases, may affect the conclusions. At least, the use of the very strong 2X35S promoter to trigger chimerical protein expression may overwhelm the translation and import machineries, leading to erroneous localization. However, the low number of discrepancy cases between our results and published information gained using a very large set of techniques largely validate our strategy and strengthen our results (Table 3).
Most discrepancies between our work and previous experimental localizations concern dual-localized proteins. Four of our dual-localized candidates (EMB175, AT5G14080, AT1G64100, AtC401) were previously shown in a single organelle using proteomic approaches74PPDB. Similarly, MEF11, and AHG11 were functionally characterized in mitochondria editing,77-79 and AT3G62890-GFP fusion was previously observed in plastids in houseSUBA3, whereas our results suggested a dual localization in both organelles for these three proteins. In contrast, three PPR proteins (AT2G37230, AT3G15130, AT5G06540) are suspected to have a dual localization because of proteomics results PPDB,42,44 or expression of fusion proteins (unpublished result from SUBA3), and were observed only in one of the two organelles in our study. Finally, five proteins previously observed in plastid extracts (AT1G09900, AT1G19720, AT2G28050, AT3G01580) or shown to be involved in plastid editing (AT3G14330) were observed in mitochondria in our study. Without any functional characterization, these differences cannot be definitively solved. Erroneous dual localization based on RFP-fusion localization could be explained by artifacts triggered by overexpression, whereas erroneous dual localization based on proteomics experiments could be due to sample contaminations. On the other hand, erroneous single localization might be common because of limitation in protein detection in one of the compartments during proteomics or microscopy experiments. The functional characterization of a protein in one of the two organelles does not refute the localization in the other one. Due to these experimental detection limitations, as well as the fact that we believe that dual-localized PPR proteins are mostly underestimated (see below), we have tentatively concluded that these 14 PPR proteins are localized in both organelles.
During this work, we did not observe the nuclear localization of GRP23 published by Ding and co-workers;27 however, we did observe a mitochondrial localization of the TP fused to RFP, as described previously by Narsai and co-workers.57 The GRP23 Nuclear Localization Signal, located at position 99–108, was not included in the 100 amino acid fragment used in our experiments.27 Taken together, these results suggest that GRP23, as PNM1, may localize in both mitochondria and nucleus.
Addressing of PPR proteins to both organelles is underestimated
We identified 19 new PPR proteins that could have a role in both organelles. Integration of proteomic data and previous fluorescent subcellular localization studies suggest that overall at least 45 PPR proteins could be dual targeted. Recently, about 100 nuclear-encoded proteins were shown to be targeted to both mitochondria and plastids.80 They are proposed to code for important cellular housekeeping activities. In addition, a study showed that in many cases, the dual targeting of proteins is conserved in three distant Viridiplantae species,81 allowing to assume that some PPR proteins could have the same dual localization in several species and probably with related functions.
Among the PPR family, five proteins were published to be dually addressed into mitochondria and plastids.57,58,69,82 The two orthologs, PPR2263 of maize and MITOCHONDRIAL EDITING FACTOR29 of Arabidopsis (included in our study), were shown to localize mainly in mitochondria, in which they edit nad5 and cob transcripts, but also in plastids, in which their function remain to be elucidated.69 Four other PPRs (PRORP1, OTP87, AT1G06270, AT4G21170) were not assayed in our investigation because their predicted localizations were not ambiguous according to our criteria. AT1G06270 and AT4G21170 are uncharacterized P-type PPR proteins shown as dually localized by Narsai and co-workers.57 PROTEINACEOUS RNASE P 1 (PRORP1) was the first PPR protein shown to be dually addressed.58 PRORP1 is an atypical PPR protein composed of 5.5 consecutive PPR repeats linked to a carboxyl-terminal (C-terminal) metallonuclease domain by a structural zinc-binding domain.83 This protein is responsible for the nucleolitic maturation of tRNAs, an activity required in both organelles. By the use of targeting peptides fused to GFP protein, three proteins (OTP87, AT1G06270, AT4G21170) were also found in both organelles.57,82 OTP87 is an essential PPR protein required for RNA editing of mitochondrial nad7 and atp1 transcripts in A. thaliana. However, the depletion by an antisense strategy of OSPPR1, the ortholog of OTP87 in O. sativa, was described to affect the chloroplast biogenesis.84 The predictions of localization corresponding to these five dual-localized proteins are either mitochondrial or plastidial (Table 2). Similarly, among 45 PPR proteins suspected to be localized in both organelles, eight are predicted in chloroplasts, 28 in mitochondria, and only nine do not have any predicted subcellular localization (Table 2). This suggests that many dual-targeted PPR proteins might be still unidentified. In particular, we suspect that many might be included in the 172 PPR proteins having a clear localization prediction in one of the two organelles. Moreover, although different mechanisms of dual targeting exist in the plant cell,85 the current information does not help to hypothesize by which mechanism PPR proteins could be dual targeted, preventing the predictions of these dual localizations.
Dual targeting to mitochondria and chloroplast is an emerging class of localization in the plant cell and the PPR family seems to have an important contribution. Taking into account the functions of PPR proteins in RNA editing, RNA processing, and translation, this type of localization in the PPR family is not surprising and could be seen as a way to control or coordinate organelle RNA metabolism.86,87 However, this hypothesis requires testing because, until now, only one PPR protein has been shown to function in both organelles.58 The analysis of domains in a PPR protein could help to infer its putative function. PPR proteins with dual localization seem to be present in all types of functional categories. However, among 45 dual-localized PPR proteins, 31 belong to the PPR-PLS subclass showing a probable overrepresentation of this subclass in the dual-targeted PPR proteins. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the localization of many PPR-P proteins (115) were not characterized yet, probably biasing this observation.
PPR proteins localized out of organelles seem to represent atypical examples in the family
Using the first 300 bp, we also identified nine PPR proteins potentially addressed out of the organelles, i.e. giving a nuclear and cytosolic localization. None were confirmed using the whole ORFs (Table 1, Fig. 1). This suggests that the number of PPR proteins being out of organelles is smaller than we thought when this work was initiated. In total, less than 1–2% of PPR proteins could function in the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus (Fig. 2). This value may be still overestimated as the model gene loci are sometimes miss-predicted, in particular, concerning the initiation codon. This may also suggest that the correct targeting sometime needs a peptide longer than the 100 amino acids we used for our work. Huang and co-workers showed that the length of mitochondrial pre-sequence varied greatly from 19–109 amino acids.36 For GRP23, the beginning of the NLS signal has been located at the amino acid 99. Using the first 100 amino acids, we observed RFP signal into mitochondria (as previously described by Narsai and coworkers57) whereas the full-length protein localizes in the nucleus.27 This findings confirm that systematic localization using the whole proteins could give more accurate information on PPR localizations.
The case of PNM1 is even more complicated. The PNM1 nuclear localization is controlled by a NLS sequence in the C terminus of the protein82 but the whole protein is addressed to mitochondria. The nuclear localization was only obtained with a truncated form of the protein without the predicted targeting peptide fused with the reporter fluorescent protein. This nuclear localization was confirmed using a specific antibody. The meaning of such a complex addressing system is still a matter of debate but suggests that a few very interesting PPR could be involved in signaling between organelles and nucleus.86
Materials and Methods
Bioinformatic predictions and data collection
Subcellular localization prediction of the PPR proteins were performed using TargetP server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) (version 1.01 was used when we initiated this work to select the 166 PPRs and version 1.1 was used when we built Tables 1 and 2), Predotar v1.03 (http://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/predotar/predotar.html), iPSORT (http://ipsort.hgc.jp/), Loctree (https://www.rostlab.org/owiki/index.php/Loctree), Multiloc (http://abi.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/Services/MultiLoc/), and AtSubP (http://bioinfo3.noble.org/AtSubP/?dowhat=About) software using default setting. Proteomic data was recovered from published proteomic references and subcellular proteome databases: PPDB (Plant Proteome Database http://ppdb.tc.cornell.edu/),43 SUBA3 (Subcellular location database for Arabidopsis proteins http://suba.plantenergy.uwa.edu.au/),5 and AT_CHLORO (http://www.grenoble.prabi.fr/at_chloro/).42
Subcellular localization of proteins
The first 100 codons or the whole PPR ORFs were PCR amplified from Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0) genomic DNA or cDNA using iProof DNA polymerase (Bio-Rad), specific primers (listed in Table S1) and a two-step amplification protocol as described previously.11 PCR products were recombined into pDONR207 (Invitrogen) using Gateway® BP Clonase® II Enzyme mix (Invitrogen) as described.11 For microscopic investigation, LR recombination reactions were performed using Gateway® LR Clonase® Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen) in order to transfer PPR sequences from Entry vectors to the pGREENII-derived destination vector p0229-RFP211 allowing C-terminal translational fusion with the RFP protein under the control of the 2X35S promoter. The proper ORF fusion was confirmed by sequencing using P35STL (5′-CGAATCTCAA GCAATCAAGC-3′) and RFP2rev (5′-TGAACTCGGT GATGACGTTC-3′) primers.
Binary vectors were introduced into thermo-competent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1 harboring the helper plasmid pSOUP.88 A single resistant colony was then used to inoculate 5 mL of Luria Bertani medium supplemented with 5 mg L−1 Tetracycline, 50 mg L−1 Kanamycine, and 2.5 mg L−1 Rifampicine. This overnight pre-culture was then diluted 10 times and further grown overnight in similar conditions. After centrifugation, Agrobacterium cells were re-suspended in agro-infiltration buffer (10 mM MES/KOH pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 µM 3′,5′-Dimethoxy-4′-hydroxyacetophenone -Sigma-Aldrich-) with a final OD600 between 0.2–0.3, and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Agrobacterium suspensions were infiltrated using 1 mL syringes without needle in leaves of Nicotana benthamiana.
Protoplasts were prepared from leaf material (harvested 48–96 h after infiltration), cut into thin strips, and incubated in enzyme solution containing 4.3 g.L−1 Murashige and Skoog Basal Salt Mixture (ICN Biomedicale), 0.5 g.L−1 MES, 20 g.L−1 sucrose, 80 g.L−1 mannitol, KOH to pH 5.6, 0.4 g.L−1 Pectinase from Rhizopus sp. (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 g.L−1 Driselase® Basidiomycetes sp.. (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 g.L−1 Cellulase Onozuka RS from Trichoderma viride (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH) at 28 °C for 2–4 h.89 Protoplasts were observed using an Eclipse TE2000S inverted microscope (Nikon) and RFP signal monitored using a custom filter block (exciter HQ546/12, emitter HQ605/75, beam-splitter Q560lp; Chroma Technology). For each construction, at least three independent agro-infiltrations were realized and each of them was observed independently by two of the authors. To confirm mitochondrial localizations, protoplasts were stained with 1 µM MitoTracker Green (Invitrogen) for 15–30 min. For confocal microscopy, proteins were visualized using a spectral Leica SP2 AOBS confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) equipped with argon and HeNe lasers. Fluorescent signals were detected with a sequential configuration using a 488 nm laser line (MitoTracker Green: excitation/emission 488/510–530 nm) and a 543 nm laser line (RFP: excitation/emission 543/570–600 nm and chlorophyll autofluorescence: excitation/emission 543/600–700 nm). The images were coded red (RFP), green (MitoTracker Green), and blue (chlorophyll autofluorescence), giving yellow co-localization in mitochondria when green and red signals overlap in merged images and violet co-localization in plastid when blue and red signals overlap. Microscopic observations were performed using a Leica HCPL APO 633/1.20 Water Corr/0.17 Lbd.BL objective. Each image shown represents the projection of optical sections taken as a Z series.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Etienne Delannoy (Unité de Recherche en Génomique Végétale) for valuable discussions and comments on the article. We thank Olivier Grandjean (Institut Jean Pierre Bourgin), and Lionel Gissot (Institut Jean Pierre Bourgin) for their help with confocal microscopy. We thank Andeol Falcon de Longevialle (Genopole Plant Process Innovation) for providing us with beautiful healthy Nicotiana benthamiana plants. We thank Jennifer Yansouni for English editing. This research was supported a PhD fellowship to ML-O from the Université d’Evry Val-d’Essonne and the French Ministry of Research and Higher Education.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- PPR
PentatricoPeptide Repeat
- RFP
red fluorescent protein
- ORF
open reading frame
- TP
targeting peptide
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material may be found here: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/rnabiology/article/26128/
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/rnabiology/article/26128
References
- 1.Initiative AG, Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gray MW. Evolution of organellar genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999;9:678–87. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)00030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Unseld M, Marienfeld JR, Brandt P, Brennicke A. The mitochondrial genome of Arabidopsis thaliana contains 57 genes in 366,924 nucleotides. Nat Genet. 1997;15:57–61. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Tabata S. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 1999;6:283–90. doi: 10.1093/dnares/6.5.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tanz SK, Castleden I, Hooper CM, Vacher M, Small I, Millar HA. SUBA3: a database for integrating experimentation and prediction to define the SUBcellular location of proteins in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D1185–91. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Duncan O, Murcha MW, Whelan J. Unique components of the plant mitochondrial protein import apparatus. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:304–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kikuchi S, Bédard J, Hirano M, Hirabayashi Y, Oishi M, Imai M, Takase M, Ide T, Nakai M. Uncovering the protein translocon at the chloroplast inner envelope membrane. Science. 2013;339:571–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schleiff E, Becker T. Common ground for protein translocation: access control for mitochondria and chloroplasts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12:48–59. doi: 10.1038/nrm3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Binder S, Brennicke A. Gene expression in plant mitochondria: transcriptional and post-transcriptional control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:181–8, discussion 188-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schmitz-Linneweber C, Small I. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins: a socket set for organelle gene expression. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:663–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lurin C, Andrés C, Aubourg S, Bellaoui M, Bitton F, Bruyère C, Caboche M, Debast C, Gualberto J, Hoffmann B, et al. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat proteins reveals their essential role in organelle biogenesis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:2089–103. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.022236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Toole N, Hattori M, Andres C, Iida K, Lurin C, Schmitz-Linneweber C, Sugita M, Small I. On the expansion of the pentatricopeptide repeat gene family in plants. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1120–8. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Banks JA, Nishiyama T, Hasebe M, Bowman JL, Gribskov M, dePamphilis C, Albert VA, Aono N, Aoyama T, Ambrose BA, et al. The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants. Science. 2011;332:960–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1203810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujii S, Small I. The evolution of RNA editing and pentatricopeptide repeat genes. New Phytol. 2011;191:37–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.de Longevialle AF, Small ID, Lurin C. Nuclearly encoded splicing factors implicated in RNA splicing in higher plant organelles. Mol Plant. 2010;3:691–705. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barkan A, Rojas M, Fujii S, Yap A, Chong YS, Bond CS, Small I. A combinatorial amino acid code for RNA recognition by pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yagi Y, Hayashi S, Kobayashi K, Hirayama T, Nakamura T. Elucidation of the RNA recognition code for pentatricopeptide repeat proteins involved in organelle RNA editing in plants. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kotera E, Tasaka M, Shikanai T. A pentatricopeptide repeat protein is essential for RNA editing in chloroplasts. Nature. 2005;433:326–30. doi: 10.1038/nature03229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zehrmann A, Verbitskiy D, van der Merwe JA, Brennicke A, Takenaka M. A DYW domain-containing pentatricopeptide repeat protein is required for RNA editing at multiple sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2009;21:558–67. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Longevialle AF, Meyer EH, Andrés C, Taylor NL, Lurin C, Millar AH, Small ID. The pentatricopeptide repeat gene OTP43 is required for trans-splicing of the mitochondrial nad1 Intron 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2007;19:3256–65. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Longevialle AF, Hendrickson L, Taylor NL, Delannoy E, Lurin C, Badger M, Millar AH, Small I. The pentatricopeptide repeat gene OTP51 with two LAGLIDADG motifs is required for the cis-splicing of plastid ycf3 intron 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008;56:157–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schmitz-Linneweber C, Williams-Carrier R, Barkan A. RNA immunoprecipitation and microarray analysis show a chloroplast Pentatricopeptide repeat protein to be associated with the 5′ region of mRNAs whose translation it activates. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2791–804. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.034454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Uyttewaal M, Mireau H, Rurek M, Hammani K, Arnal N, Quadrado M, Giegé P. PPR336 is associated with polysomes in plant mitochondria. J Mol Biol. 2008;375:626–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lloyd J, Meinke D. A comprehensive dataset of genes with a loss-of-function mutant phenotype in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:1115–29. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.192393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Muralla R, Lloyd J, Meinke D. Molecular foundations of reproductive lethality in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gutmann B, Gobert A, Giegé P. PRORP proteins support RNase P activity in both organelles and the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1022–7. doi: 10.1101/gad.189514.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ding YH, Liu NY, Tang ZS, Liu J, Yang WC. Arabidopsis GLUTAMINE-RICH PROTEIN23 is essential for early embryogenesis and encodes a novel nuclear PPR motif protein that interacts with RNA polymerase II subunit III. Plant Cell. 2006;18:815–30. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hammani K, Gobert A, Hleibieh K, Choulier L, Small I, Giegé P. An Arabidopsis dual-localized pentatricopeptide repeat protein interacts with nuclear proteins involved in gene expression regulation. Plant Cell. 2011;23:730–40. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.De Renzis S, Elemento O, Tavazoie S, Wieschaus EF. Unmasking activation of the zygotic genome using chromosomal deletions in the Drosophila embryo. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bratic A, Wredenberg A, Grönke S, Stewart JB, Mourier A, Ruzzenente B, Kukat C, Wibom R, Habermann B, Partridge L, et al. The bicoid stability factor controls polyadenylation and expression of specific mitochondrial mRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:953–71. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Small I, Peeters N, Legeai F, Lurin C. Predotar: A tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics. 2004;4:1581–90. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gavel Y, Nilsson L, von Heijne G. Mitochondrial targeting sequences. Why ‘non-amphiphilic’ peptides may still be amphiphilic. FEBS Lett. 1988;235:173–7. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81257-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roise D. Recognition and binding of mitochondrial presequences during the import of proteins into mitochondria. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1997;29:19–27. doi: 10.1023/A:1022403604273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Waltner M, Hammen PK, Weiner H. Influence of the mature portion of a precursor protein on the mitochondrial signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:21226–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.35.21226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huang S, Taylor NL, Whelan J, Millar AH. Refining the definition of plant mitochondrial presequences through analysis of sorting signals, N-terminal modifications, and cleavage motifs. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1272–85. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bionda T, Tillmann B, Simm S, Beilstein K, Ruprecht M, Schleiff E. Chloroplast import signals: the length requirement for translocation in vitro and in vivo. J Mol Biol. 2010;402:510–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bannai H, Tamada Y, Maruyama O, Nakai K, Miyano S. Extensive feature detection of N-terminal protein sorting signals. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:298–305. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nair R, Rost B. Mimicking cellular sorting improves prediction of subcellular localization. J Mol Biol. 2005;348:85–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Höglund A, Dönnes P, Blum T, Adolph HW, Kohlbacher O. MultiLoc: prediction of protein subcellular localization using N-terminal targeting sequences, sequence motifs and amino acid composition. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1158–65. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kaundal R, Saini R, Zhao PX. Combining machine learning and homology-based approaches to accurately predict subcellular localization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:36–54. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ferro M, Brugière S, Salvi D, Seigneurin-Berny D, Court M, Moyet L, Ramus C, Miras S, Mellal M, Le Gall S, et al. AT_CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome database with subplastidial localization and curated information on envelope proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9:1063–84. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900325-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sun Q, Zybailov B, Majeran W, Friso G, Olinares PD, van Wijk KJ. PPDB, the Plant Proteomics Database at Cornell. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D969–74. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang S, Taylor NL, Narsai R, Eubel H, Whelan J, Millar AH. Experimental analysis of the rice mitochondrial proteome, its biogenesis, and heterogeneity. Plant Physiol. 2009;149:719–34. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huang M, Friso G, Nishimura K, Qu X, Olinares PD, Majeran W, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. Construction of plastid reference proteomes for maize and Arabidopsis and evaluation of their orthologous relationships; the concept of orthoproteomics. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:491–504. doi: 10.1021/pr300952g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hummel M, Cordewener JH, de Groot JC, Smeekens S, America AH, Hanson J. Dynamic protein composition of Arabidopsis thaliana cytosolic ribosomes in response to sucrose feeding as revealed by label free MSE proteomics. Proteomics. 2012;12:1024–38. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ito J, Batth TS, Petzold CJ, Redding-Johanson AM, Mukhopadhyay A, Verboom R, Meyer EH, Millar AH, Heazlewood JL. Analysis of the Arabidopsis cytosolic proteome highlights subcellular partitioning of central plant metabolism. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1571–82. doi: 10.1021/pr1009433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pendle AF, Clark GP, Boon R, Lewandowska D, Lam YW, Andersen J, Mann M, Lamond AI, Brown JW, Shaw PJ. Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis nucleolus suggests novel nucleolar functions. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:260–9. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sakamoto Y, Takagi S. LITTLE NUCLEI 1 and 4 regulate nuclear morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:622–33. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Alexandersson E, Saalbach G, Larsson C, Kjellbom P. Arabidopsis plasma membrane proteomics identifies components of transport, signal transduction and membrane trafficking. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1543–56. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pch209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jaquinod M, Villiers F, Kieffer-Jaquinod S, Hugouvieux V, Bruley C, Garin J, Bourguignon J. A proteomics dissection of Arabidopsis thaliana vacuoles isolated from cell culture. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:394–412. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M600250-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Keinath NF, Kierszniowska S, Lorek J, Bourdais G, Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Grossniklaus U, Schulze WX, Robatzek S, Panstruga R. PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern)-induced changes in plasma membrane compartmentalization reveal novel components of plant immunity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39140–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.160531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li B, Takahashi D, Kawamura Y, Uemura M. Comparison of plasma membrane proteomic changes of Arabidopsis suspension-cultured cells (T87 Line) after cold and ABA treatment in association with freezing tolerance development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:543–54. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mitra SK, Walters BT, Clouse SD, Goshe MB. An efficient organic solvent based extraction method for the proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis plasma membranes. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:2752–67. doi: 10.1021/pr801044y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Szponarski W, Sommerer N, Boyer JC, Rossignol M, Gibrat R. Large-scale characterization of integral proteins from Arabidopsis vacuolar membrane by two-dimensional liquid chromatography. Proteomics. 2004;4:397–406. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang ZJ, Peck SC. Simplified enrichment of plasma membrane proteins for proteomic analyses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteomics. 2011;11:1780–8. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Narsai R, Law SR, Carrie C, Xu L, Whelan J. In-depth temporal transcriptome profiling reveals a crucial developmental switch with roles for RNA processing and organelle metabolism that are essential for germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:1342–62. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gobert A, Gutmann B, Taschner A, Gössringer M, Holzmann J, Hartmann RK, Rossmanith W, Giegé P. A single Arabidopsis organellar protein has RNase P activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:740–4. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Majeran W, Friso G, Asakura Y, Qu X, Huang M, Ponnala L, Watkins KP, Barkan A, van Wijk KJ. Nucleoid-enriched proteomes in developing plastids and chloroplasts from maize leaves: a new conceptual framework for nucleoid functions. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:156–89. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.188474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hashimoto M, Endo T, Peltier G, Tasaka M, Shikanai T. A nucleus-encoded factor, CRR2, is essential for the expression of chloroplast ndhB in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003;36:541–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Meierhoff K, Felder S, Nakamura T, Bechtold N, Schuster G. HCF152, an Arabidopsis RNA binding pentatricopeptide repeat protein involved in the processing of chloroplast psbB-psbT-psbH-petB-petD RNAs. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1480–95. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schmitz-Linneweber C, Williams-Carrier RE, Williams-Voelker PM, Kroeger TS, Vichas A, Barkan A. A pentatricopeptide repeat protein facilitates the trans-splicing of the maize chloroplast rps12 pre-mRNA. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2650–63. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gutiérrez-Marcos JF, Dal Prà M, Giulini A, Costa LM, Gavazzi G, Cordelier S, Sellam O, Tatout C, Paul W, Perez P, et al. empty pericarp4 encodes a mitochondrion-targeted pentatricopeptide repeat protein necessary for seed development and plant growth in maize. Plant Cell. 2007;19:196–210. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cai W, Ji D, Peng L, Guo J, Ma J, Zou M, Lu C, Zhang L. LPA66 is required for editing psbF chloroplast transcripts in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1260–71. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.136812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Okuda K, Chateigner-Boutin AL, Nakamura T, Delannoy E, Sugita M, Myouga F, Motohashi R, Shinozaki K, Small I, Shikanai T. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins with the DYW motif have distinct molecular functions in RNA editing and RNA cleavage in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell. 2009;21:146–56. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Laluk K, Abuqamar S, Mengiste T. The Arabidopsis mitochondria-localized pentatricopeptide repeat protein PGN functions in defense against necrotrophic fungi and abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:2053–68. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.177501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Takenaka M. MEF9, an E-subclass pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is required for an RNA editing event in the nad7 transcript in mitochondria of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:939–47. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.151175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hammani K, Okuda K, Tanz SK, Chateigner-Boutin AL, Shikanai T, Small I. A study of new Arabidopsis chloroplast RNA editing mutants reveals general features of editing factors and their target sites. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3686–99. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sosso D, Mbelo S, Vernoud V, Gendrot G, Dedieu A, Chambrier P, Dauzat M, Heurtevin L, Guyon V, Takenaka M, et al. PPR2263, a DYW-Subgroup Pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is required for mitochondrial nad5 and cob transcript editing, mitochondrion biogenesis, and maize growth. Plant Cell. 2012;24:676–91. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.091074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhu Q, Dugardeyn J, Zhang C, Takenaka M, Kühn K, Craddock C, Smalle J, Karampelias M, Denecke J, Peters J, et al. SLO2, a mitochondrial pentatricopeptide repeat protein affecting several RNA editing sites, is required for energy metabolism. Plant J. 2012;71:836–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chateigner-Boutin AL, Colas des Francs-Small C, Fujii S, Okuda K, Tanz SK, Small I. The E domains of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins from different organelles are not functionally equivalent for RNA editing. Plant J. 2013;74:935–45. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Heazlewood JL, Tonti-Filippini JS, Gout AM, Day DA, Whelan J, Millar AH. Experimental analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome highlights signaling and regulatory components, provides assessment of targeting prediction programs, and indicates plant-specific mitochondrial proteins. Plant Cell. 2004;16:241–56. doi: 10.1105/tpc.016055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, von Zychlinski A, Christopher W, Sjölander K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr Biol. 2004;14:354–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Klodmann J, Senkler M, Rode C, Braun HP. Defining the protein complex proteome of plant mitochondria. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:587–98. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.182352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Peltier JB, Ytterberg AJ, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. New functions of the thylakoid membrane proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by a simple, fast, and versatile fractionation strategy. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:49367–83. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406763200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zybailov B, Rutschow H, Friso G, Rudella A, Emanuelsson O, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. Sorting signals, N-terminal modifications and abundance of the chloroplast proteome. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Murayama M, Hayashi S, Nishimura N, Ishide M, Kobayashi K, Yagi Y, Asami T, Nakamura T, Shinozaki K, Hirayama T. Isolation of Arabidopsis ahg11, a weak ABA hypersensitive mutant defective in nad4 RNA editing. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:5301–10. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tang J, Kobayashi K, Suzuki M, Matsumoto S, Muranaka T. The mitochondrial PPR protein LOVASTATIN INSENSITIVE 1 plays regulatory roles in cytosolic and plastidial isoprenoid biosynthesis through RNA editing. Plant J. 2010;61:456–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04082.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Verbitskiy D, Zehrmann A, van der Merwe JA, Brennicke A, Takenaka M. The PPR protein encoded by the LOVASTATIN INSENSITIVE 1 gene is involved in RNA editing at three sites in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010;61:446–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04076.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Carrie C, Small I. A reevaluation of dual-targeting of proteins to mitochondria and chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:253–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Xu L, Carrie C, Law SR, Murcha MW, Whelan J. Acquisition, conservation, and loss of dual-targeted proteins in land plants. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:644–62. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.210997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hammani K, des Francs-Small CC, Takenaka M, Tanz SK, Okuda K, Shikanai T, Brennicke A, Small I. The pentatricopeptide repeat protein OTP87 is essential for RNA editing of nad7 and atp1 transcripts in Arabidopsis mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:21361–71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.230516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Howard MJ, Lim WH, Fierke CA, Koutmos M. Mitochondrial ribonuclease P structure provides insight into the evolution of catalytic strategies for precursor-tRNA 5′ processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:16149–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1209062109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gothandam KM, Kim ES, Cho H, Chung YY. OsPPR1, a pentatricopeptide repeat protein of rice is essential for the chloroplast biogenesis. Plant Mol Biol. 2005;58:421–33. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-5702-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yogev O, Pines O. Dual targeting of mitochondrial proteins: mechanism, regulation and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:1012–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Duchêne AM, Giegé P. Dual localized mitochondrial and nuclear proteins as gene expression regulators in plants? Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:221. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Krause K, Krupinska K. Nuclear regulators with a second home in organelles. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:194–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hellens RP, Edwards EA, Leyland NR, Bean S, Mullineaux PM. pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42:819–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1006496308160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chupeau Y, Bourgin JP, Missonier C, Dorion N, Morel G. Preparation and culture of protoplasts from various Nicotiana species. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences. 1974;D 278:1565–8. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

