Skip to main content
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 2013 Nov 25;123(12):5001–5004. doi: 10.1172/JCI73202

Tuning mTOR activity for immune balance

Kai Yang 1, Hongbo Chi 1
PMCID: PMC3859402  PMID: 24270416

Abstract

The mTOR pathway orchestrates diverse physiological processes, including T cell functions and fate decisions; however, the regulation of mTOR-dependent T cell differentiation remains elusive. In this issue, Park et al. examine the role of TSC1, an mTOR signaling regulator, in T cell differentiation and the balance between T cell–mediated immunity and tolerance. They found that enhanced mTOR activity in Tsc1-deficient T cells promotes Th1 and Th17 differentiation, leading to increased intestinal inflammation in murine colitis. Tsc1-deficient Tregs had impaired suppressive activity in inflammatory conditions. These defects were associated with the acquisition of effector-like phenotypes and could be further exacerbated by concomitant loss of transcription factor Foxo3. This study highlights that TSC1-mediated control of mTOR activity impinges on the balance between immunity and tolerance by dictating effector and regulatory T cell responses.

Introduction

mTOR is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinase that couples diverse cellular and environmental cues to cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation. In mammalian cells, mTOR interacts with multiple proteins and forms two distinct complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2, which exhibit distinct roles in many physiological processes (1). The scaffold proteins Raptor and Rictor are characterized as obligatory components of mTORC1 and mTORC2, respectively (Figure 1). mTORC1 activity is tightly controlled by multiple regulators. The upstream TSC complex, composed of tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1) and TSC2, inhibits mTORC1 activity by suppressing the function of Rheb (Ras homolog enriched in brain). Mutations of TSC1 or TSC2 are associated with hamartoma syndrome with tissue overgrowth. Furthermore, mTOR dysfunction contributes to a large number of human diseases, including cancer, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and neurodegeneration (1).

Figure 1. Schematics of mTOR signaling.

Figure 1

mTORC1 and mTORC2 signal through distinct downstream effector pathways to orchestrate diverse cellular processes.

In the immune system, T cells play a pivotal role in adaptive immunity. Emerging evidence reveals that mTOR signaling impinges on multiple physiological processes of T cells, including their development, homeostasis, proliferation, and differentiation (2). Disruption of mTORC2 by ablation of Rictor impairs Notch-mediated proliferation and differentiation of pre–T cells in thymus (3, 4) and delays malignant transformation in a murine model of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) (3). In the peripheral immune compartment, mTOR-deficient CD4+ T cells are unable to differentiate into effector cells, including Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, and instead preferentially develop into induced Tregs (5). Furthermore, Rheb/mTORC1 and mTORC2 are selectively involved in the lineage differentiation of effector T cells (6, 7). Aside from these recent advances in our understanding of the core machinery of mTOR signaling, we are also starting to appreciate the T cell–modifying effects of dysregulated mTOR activity via the genetic modulation of mTOR upstream regulators (2). Under steady state, TSC1 deficiency and the ensuing mTORC1 activation disrupt the quiescence of naive T cells, leading to defective cell survival and antibacterial immune responses (810). Thus, keeping mTORC1 in check is essential for the maintenance of T cell homeostasis; however, the function of TSC1 in CD4+ T cell fate decisions and inflammatory responses remains largely unexplored.

Control of Th1 and Th17 differentiation and intestinal inflammation

Effector T cells are crucial for protective immunity against pathogens in the mucosal environment, but their excessive activity may drive inflammation. Park et al. observed that aged mice (over 20 weeks old) with T cell–specific ablation of TSC1 developed spontaneous inflammation and lymphocyte infiltration in the colon and liver (11), suggesting that TSC1 deficiency enhances T cell responses to intestinal antigens. To explore this possibility, the authors used a murine model, in which chronic colitis was induced by exposure to 2% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) in the drinking water for 7 days, followed by administration of regular water. In this model, TSC1-deficient mice exhibited more severe weight loss and a slower recovery after DSS removal compared with WT mice. Keeping with the well-recognized pathogenic roles of Th1 and Th17 cells in intestinal inflammation, TSC1-deficient T cells produced excessive amounts of IFN-γ and IL-17A. The effect of TSC1 deficiency in promoting Th1 and Th17 differentiation was recapitulated under Th1- or Th17-polarizing conditions in vitro. Furthermore, TSC1-deficient T cells showed enhanced IFN-γ and IL-17A production upon antigen immunization in vivo. These findings collectively demonstrate that TSC1 deficiency aberrantly promotes the differentiation of T cells into Th1 and Th17 subsets. Interestingly, TSC1-deficient T cells produced normal levels of IFN-γ and IL-17A upon direct ex vivo stimulation, suggesting a specific role for TSC1 in restraining Th1 and Th17 differentiation in inflammatory environments, such as in the intestine or upon immune stimulation (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Roles of TSC1/2 in Th17 and Treg responses.

Figure 2

TSC1 functions within the TSC1/TSC2 complex to repress Rheb-dependent mTORC1 and downstream S6K1 activation. TSC1 also promotes mTORC2/AKT activity to inactivate Foxo3a. TSC1-mediated downstream pathways S6K1 and Foxo3a in turn regulate Th17 and Treg responses.

Maintenance of Treg function and identity

Intestinal homeostasis arises from a highly dynamic balance between effector T cell responses and regulatory mechanisms, in which Foxp3-expressing Tregs play a central role (12). Park et al. asked whether exacerbated inflammation in the absence of TSC1 was also due to defects in the Treg compartment, specifically Foxp3 expression and in vivo suppressive activity (11). They observed that Tregs were reduced in the spleens and colonic lamina propria (cLP) of TSC1-deficient mice after DSS exposure. TSC1 deficiency did not impact TGF-β–mediated generation of induced Tregs in vitro or the homeostasis of thymus-derived Tregs in peripheral lymphoid organs (8). Although previous studies have established a negative role of mTOR signaling in Treg differentiation (2, 5), TSC1 deficiency appears to impact the Treg population only under inflammatory conditions. The authors also assessed the suppressive function of TSC1-deficient Tregs in a T cell–mediated colitis model by transferring conventional T cells along with WT or mutant Tregs into Rag1–/– mice. While the transfer of WT Tregs prevented conventional T cell–mediated intestinal inflammation, the transfer of TSC1-deficient Tregs did not. To specifically examine the intrinsic role of TSC1 in Tregs, the authors developed a mouse line with TSC1 specifically ablated in Foxp3+ Treg cells (Foxp3YFPCreTsc1f/f). Tregs from these mice showed impaired suppression of colitis development, similar to that observed in mice with T cell–specific TSC1 deficiency. These findings indicate that TSC1 is required for maintaining Foxp3 expression and mediating Treg suppression in an inflammatory environment.

What is the underlying mechanism? Under lymphopenic and/or inflammatory conditions, especially in the intestine, Tregs may become unstable, as indicated by loss of Foxp3 expression, and/or aberrantly acquire effector functions, thereby contributing to uncontrolled inflammation (13). Park et al. therefore examined the effect of TSC1 on Treg stability (11). They generated a reporter strain by crossing Foxp3YFPCreTsc1f/f mice with a mouse strain that expresses RFP as a reporter of Cre activity. In this fate-mapping system, unstable Tregs known as “ex-Tregs” are detected as a unique RFP+YFPCre population (i.e., these cells have expressed Foxp3 but are no longer actively expressing Foxp3). Loss of TSC1 expanded the ex-Treg population. More remarkably, this population exhibited a noticeable reduction of Foxp3 expression and acquired the ability to produce IL-17A. These data indicate that TSC1-dependent enforcement of the suppressive activity of Tregs is contingent on the capacity of TSC1 to maintain Treg stability by preventing diversion into a Th17 effector lineage.

Signaling mechanisms in T cell fate decisions

Park et al. explored downstream signaling events in TSC1-deficient T cells to determine TSC1-mediated molecular mechanisms in T cell fate decisions (11). Consistent with previous reports (810), TSC1 deficiency promoted mTORC1 activity, as indicated by increased S6K1 phosphorylation and the expression of GRB10, a recently identified mTORC1 target that mediates feedback inhibition of insulin signaling (14, 15). The authors then targeted S6K1 and GRB10 to dissect their contributions in Th17 differentiation. Reduction of Grb10 with shRNA had little effect; however, shRNA-dependent knockdown of Rps6kb1 markedly suppressed Th17 differentiation for both WT and TSC1-deficient naive T cells. Rps6kb1 knockdown also prevented increased IL-17A production in TSC1-deficient Tregs. Together, these results demonstrate that S6K1 mediates the effects of TSC1 deficiency and mTORC1 hyperactivation on the promotion of IL-17A production in both conventional CD4+ T cells and Tregs.

Aside from increased mTORC1 activity, TSC1 deficiency attenuated the activation of mTORC2- and AKT-mediated phosphorylation of Foxo1/Foxo3a (8). Attenuated Foxo1/Foxo3a phosphorylation leads to increased stability and function of Foxo1/Foxo3a. However, the importance of this effect remains undefined, since the elimination of Rictor/mTORC2 activity has little effect on naive T cell homeostasis compared with deletion of Tsc1. Foxo family proteins are essential in Treg development and function (1618); therefore, Park et al. generated mice lacking both TSC1 and Foxo3 in the Treg compartment (11). Most of the Treg phenotypes in these double-knockout mice were similar to those observed after Tsc1 deletion; however, Foxo3 deficiency further impaired the stability of TSC1-deficient Tregs. Furthermore, these Tregs exhibited accelerated conversion into Th17-like effector T cells. Thus, the diminished mTORC2 activity in TSC1-deficient Tregs modestly ameliorated the disrupted stability of these cells. Nonetheless, increased IL-17A production in Tregs from both TSC1-deficient and Tsc1/Foxo3a double-knockout mice was blocked by rapamycin treatment, highlighting a predominant effect of enhanced mTORC1 activation on the impairment of Treg function and stability (Figure 2).

Perspective

The intestinal immune system continuously faces innocuous antigens derived from commensal microbiota and diet. Treg cells mediate immune tolerance toward these antigens, preventing effector T cell activation and undesired intestinal inflammation. TSC1 deficiency in T cells leads to enhanced Th1 and Th17 responses, but impaired Treg function and stability under inflammatory conditions such as intestinal inflammation. In contrast, TSC1 function is not required to mediate the balance between effector and regulatory T cell responses under homeostatic conditions. These results suggest the presence of specific signals during inflammation, especially in the intestine, that sustain TSC1 function in T cells, thereby preventing aberrant mTORC1 activation and dysregulated effector and regulatory T cell responses. Antiinflammatory substances such as TGF-β and retinoic acid (RA) are important in orchestrating the induction of tolerance in the intestine (12). More recently, short-chain fatty acids, a class of microbial metabolites, have been shown to establish colonic homeostasis via the regulation of Treg generation and function (19). It will be interesting to test whether these tolerogenic substances signal through TSC1 to mediate intestinal homeostasis.

Although mTOR signaling is well recognized as an orchestrator of cell metabolism (20), the metabolic function of mTOR in T cells is just beginning to be dissected. Upon antigen stimulation, T cells transit from catabolism to anabolism, with a marked increase in the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands over the quiescent state. This metabolic reprogramming is considered a crucial checkpoint for T cell activation and fate decision. mTOR activation is closely associated with the dynamic regulation of T cell metabolism, but how mTOR signaling intersects with metabolic programs in T cell responses is poorly understood (21, 22). Recently, mTORC1-dependent coupling of immune signals and cell metabolism, especially the lipogenic pathway, was found to be essential for programming Treg suppressive function (23). Interestingly, Park et al. showed that enhanced mTORC1 activity in TSC1-deficient Tregs also impairs their suppressive activity, suggesting that proper control of mTORC1 activity is essential for Tregs to function (11). Whether and how the metabolic programs mediate TSC1 function in Tregs remain to be determined.

The development of potent mTOR inhibitors has been considered an effective therapeutic strategy to treat cancer and other diseases. For example, Torin1 and PP242 are ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR that strongly suppress mTOR activity (24). However, given the importance of mTORC1 signaling in the function of T cells and other cells, completely blocking mTOR activity will impair normal immune responses to foreign pathogens. Instead, fine-tuning mTOR activity by targeting context-specific regulators of mTOR signaling, such as TSC1, offers an attractive strategy to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases and restore immune tolerance in the long run.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants from the NIH (AI101407, AI094089, and NS064599), the American Cancer Society (RSG-13-248-01-LIB, to H. Chi), and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Arthritis Foundation (to K. Yang).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article: J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5001–5004. doi:10.1172/JCI73202.

See the related article beginning on page 5165.

References

  • 1.Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149(2):274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chi H. Regulation and function of mTOR signalling in T cell fate decisions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;12(5):325–338. doi: 10.1038/nri3198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee K, et al. Vital roles of mTOR complex 2 in Notch-driven thymocyte differentiation and leukemia. J Exp Med. 2012;209(4):713–728. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tang F, Wu Q, Ikenoue T, Guan KL, Liu Y, Zheng P. A critical role for Rictor in T lymphopoiesis. J Immunol. 2012;189(4):1850–1857. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delgoffe GM, et al. The mTOR kinase differentially regulates effector and regulatory T cell lineage commitment. Immunity. 2009;30(6):832–844. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delgoffe GM, et al. The kinase mTOR regulates the differentiation of helper T cells through the selective activation of signaling by mTORC1 and mTORC2. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(4):295–303. doi: 10.1038/ni.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee K, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin protein complex 2 regulates differentiation of Th1 and Th2 cell subsets via distinct signaling pathways. Immunity. 2010;32(6):743–753. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang K, Neale G, Green DR, He W, Chi H. The tumor suppressor Tsc1 enforces quiescence of naive T cells to promote immune homeostasis and function. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(9):888–897. doi: 10.1038/ni.2068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu Q, et al. The tuberous sclerosis complex-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway maintains the quiescence and survival of naive T cells. J Immunol. 2011;187(3):1106–1112. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.O’Brien TF, et al. Regulation of T-cell survival and mitochondrial homeostasis by TSC1. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41(11):3361–3370. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Park Y, et al. TSC1 regulates the balance between effector and regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5165–5178. doi: 10.1172/JCI69751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shale M, Schiering C, Powrie F. CD4(+) T-cell subsets in intestinal inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2013;252(1):164–182. doi: 10.1111/imr.12039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou X, et al. Instability of the transcription factor Foxp3 leads to the generation of pathogenic memory T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(9):1000–1007. doi: 10.1038/ni.1774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu Y, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis identifies Grb10 as an mTORC1 substrate that negatively regulates insulin signaling. Science. 2011;332(6035):1322–1326. doi: 10.1126/science.1199484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsu PP, et al. The mTOR-regulated phosphoproteome reveals a mechanism of mTORC1-mediated inhibition of growth factor signaling. Science. 2011;332(6035):1317–1322. doi: 10.1126/science.1199498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ouyang W, Beckett O, Ma Q, Paik JH, DePinho RA, Li MO. Foxo proteins cooperatively control the differentiation of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(7):618–627. doi: 10.1038/ni.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ouyang W, et al. Novel Foxo1-dependent transcriptional programs control T(reg) cell function. Nature. 2012;491(7425):554–559. doi: 10.1038/nature11581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kerdiles YM, et al. Foxo transcription factors control regulatory T cell development and function. Immunity. 2010;33(6):890–904. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smith PM, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341(6145):569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Düvel K, et al. Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1. Mol Cell. 2010;39(2):171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang K, Chi H. mTOR and metabolic pathways in T cell quiescence and functional activation. Semin Immunol. 2012;24(6):421–428. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zeng H, Chi H. mTOR and lymphocyte metabolism. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(3):347–355. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zeng H, Yang K, Cloer C, Neale G, Vogel P, Chi H. mTORC1 couples immune signals and metabolic programming to establish T(reg)-cell function. Nature. 2013;499(7459):485–490. doi: 10.1038/nature12297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Benjamin D, Colombi M, Moroni C, Hall MN. Rapamycin passes the torch: a new generation of mTOR inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10(11):868–880. doi: 10.1038/nrd3531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES