Abstract
Enterococcus sp. strain HSIEG1 was isolated from the human small intestine. Its draft genome predicts a broad carbohydrate fermentation capability, which matches well with the observed physiological characteristics of this strain. This metabolic flexibility is expected to be of importance for survival and growth in the small intestinal habitat.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
The human small intestine is commonly predominated by facultative anaerobes, such as Streptococcus spp. (1–5). The relative abundances of other lactic acid bacteria, including enterococci, are generally low (4, 6) (M. M. Leimena, B. van den Bogert, J. Boekhorst, E. J. Smid, E. G. Zoetendal, and M. Kleerebezem, unpublished data) but can in some cases constitute a sizeable fraction of the overall microbial community in this ecosystem (7, 8). In an effort to obtain representative bacterial isolates from the small intestinal ecosystem, seven Enterococcus lineages were recovered from ileostoma effluent samples. These isolates belonged to the Enterococcus avium, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus gallinarum groups, which demonstrates the substantial level of phylogenetic richness of enterococci in the small intestine (9).
The draft genome sequence of a representative isolate from the lineage belonging to the E. gallinarum species group, Enterococcus sp. strain HSIEG1, was obtained by sequencing of 3-kb mate-pair libraries using 454 GS FLX (Roche) technology in combination with titanium chemistry and Illumina HiSeq 2000 technology (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany). A total of 153,444 pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Celera Assembler version 6.1 (http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/wgs-assembler/index.php?title=Main_Page) into 158 contigs, which were placed in their likely order by employing the 10,557,832 paired reads from Illumina sequencing using the SSPACE software version 1.1 (10). This pseudoassembly was manually screened for inconsistencies using the Artemis Comparison Tool (11). The genome was annotated using the RAST server (12). The final assembly of the Enterococcus sp. HSIEG1 genome contains 3,447,751 bp, with an average ~300-fold coverage, a G+C content of 40.45%, and 3,901 predicted protein-coding genes.
Almost 10% of the coding capacity encountered in the genome of HSIEG1 is dedicated to genes assigned to functions related to carbohydrate transport and metabolism. The HSIEG1 genome encodes single copies of the generic cytoplasmic factors enzyme I (EI) and phospho-carrier protein (HPr), which are involved in phosphotransfer of >30 phosphotransferase system (PTS) transporter functions with predicted specificities that include glucose/maltose, mannose, fructose, galactose, lactose, sucrose, cellobiose, and β-glucosides. Moreover, the genome encodes several ABC sugar transporters, including those predicted to be involved in maltose/maltodextrin transport. In addition to these transport-associated functions, the genome also encodes the necessary pathways to metabolize these sugars as well as arabinose, ribose, and xylose. HSIEG1 has the capacity to ferment all these sugars, showing that the genome predictions are in good agreement with the observed physiological characteristics. The metabolic flexibility of HSIEG1 may be of relevance for its survival in a nutrient-fluctuating environment, such as in the small intestine (13).
Following the transport and primary conversions of carbohydrates, the genome is predicted to encode the canonical enzymes of the glycolytic conversion pathway, which is the main energy-generating pathway in this species. The pyruvate dissipation pathways predicted for HSIEG1 include the capacity to produce l-lactate and several other fermentation metabolites, like formate, acetate, ethanol, acetoin, and 2,3-butanediol.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. ASKG00000000. The version described in this paper is version ASKG01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was partially supported by the Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre (NBIC).
We thank Christopher Bauser and Julia Löcherbach of GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) for assistance in the setup of genome sequencing.
Footnotes
Citation van den Bogert B, Boekhorst J, Smid EJ, Zoetendal EG, Kleerebezem M. 2013. Draft genome sequence of Enterococcus sp. strain HSIEG1, isolated from the human small intestine. Genome Announc. 1(6):e01013-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01013-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. van den Bogert B, de Vos WM, Zoetendal EG, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Microarray analysis and barcoded pyrosequencing provide consistent microbial profiles depending on the source of human intestinal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:2071–2080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Van den Bogert B, Leimena MM, De Vos WM, Zoetendal EG, Kleerebezem M. 2011. Functional intestinal metagenomics, p 170–190 In De Bruin FJ, Handbook of molecular microbial ecology, vol. II: metagenomics in different habitats. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hartman AL, Lough DM, Barupal DK, Fiehn O, Fishbein T, Zasloff M, Eisen JA. 2009. Human gut microbiome adopts an alternative state following small bowel transplantation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:17187–17192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wang M, Ahrné S, Jeppsson B, Molin G. 2005. Comparison of bacterial diversity along the human intestinal tract by direct cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 54:219–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cheng J, Kalliomäki M, Heilig HG, Palva A, Lähteenoja H, de Vos WM, Salojärvi J, Satokari R. 2013. Duodenal microbiota composition and mucosal homeostasis in pediatric celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 13:113. 10.1186/1471-230X-13-113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Booijink CC, El-Aidy S, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Heilig HG, Troost FJ, Smidt H, Kleerebezem M, De Vos WM, Zoetendal EG. 2010. High temporal and inter-individual variation detected in the human ileal microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 12:3213–3227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hayashi H, Takahashi R, Nishi T, Sakamoto M, Benno Y. 2005. Molecular analysis of jejunal, ileal, caecal and recto-sigmoidal human colonic microbiota using 16S rRNA gene libraries and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:1093–1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pyleris E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Tzivras D, Koussoulas V, Barbatzas C, Pimentel M. 2012. The prevalence of overgrowth by aerobic bacteria in the small intestine by small bowel culture: relationship with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig. Dis. Sci. 57:1321–1329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. van den Bogert B, Erkus O, Boekhorst J, de Goffau M, Smid EJ, Zoetendal EG, Kleerebezem M. 2013. Diversity of human small intestinal Streptococcus and Veillonella populations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 85:376–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. 2011. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27:578–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J. 2005. ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics 21:3422–3423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zoetendal EG, Raes J, van den Bogert B, Arumugam M, Booijink CC, Troost FJ, Bork P, Wels M, de Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. 2012. The human small intestinal microbiota is driven by rapid uptake and conversion of simple carbohydrates. ISME J. 6:1415–1426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]