Skip to main content
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B logoLink to Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
. 2013 Dec;14(12):1152–1161. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1300102

Sorption of ammonium and phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from phytoremediation plants*

Zheng Zeng 1,§, Song-da Zhang 1,2,§, Ting-qiang Li 1, Feng-liang Zhao 1, Zhen-li He 3, He-ping Zhao 1,†,, Xiao-e Yang 1,†,, Hai-long Wang 4, Jing Zhao 1, Muhammad Tariq Rafiq 1
PMCID: PMC3863373  PMID: 24302715

Abstract

The study on biochar derived from plant biomass for environmental applications is attracting more and more attention. Twelve sets of biochar were obtained by treating four phytoremediation plants, Salix rosthornii Seemen, Thalia dealbata, Vetiveria zizanioides, and Phragmites sp., sequentially through pyrolysis at 500 °C in a N2 environment, and under different temperatures (500, 600, and 700 °C) in a CO2 environment. The cation exchange capacity and specific surface area of biochar varied with both plant species and pyrolysis temperature. The magnesium (Mg) content of biochar derived from T. dealbata (TC) was obviously higher than that of the other plant biochars. This biochar also had the highest sorption capacity for phosphate and ammonium. In terms of biomass yields, adsorption capacity, and energy cost, T. dealbata biochar produced at 600 °C (TC600) is the most promising sorbent for removing contaminants (N and P) from aqueous solution. Therefore, T. dealbata appears to be the best candidate for phytoremediation application as its biomass can make a good biochar for environmental cleaning.

Keywords: Biochar, Nutrient removal, Plant species, Pyrolysis temperature, Water quality

1. Introduction

It is well known that increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs have resulted in accelerated water eutrophication worldwide (Conley et al., 2009). Eutrophication in lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, and rivers is a common environmental issue, especially in developing countries like China (Yang et al., 2008). Thus, cost-effective and highly efficient water treatment technologies are desirable. Constructed wetlands have emerged as a promising approach owing to their bioremediation potential. Both terrestrial and aquatic plants have been utilized to remove N and P from wastewater (Abe and Ozaki, 1998). Plants like Thalia dealbata, Vetiveria zizanioides, and Phragmites sp. are widely used in constructed wetlands for eutrophication control (Valipour et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2012). Seo et al. (2010) examined the nitrate and phosphate removal potential of three Salix species in a eutrophic aquatic environment, and found that rosegold pussy willow is best for N removal, and the highest P removal was observed in giant pussy willow. However, if these wetland plants are not harvested properly, nutrients that have been taken up by plants will be released back into the water during the decomposition processes (Brix, 1997; Lu et al., 2010). Thus, harvesting the plants and subsequent processing are critical. Harvested plant biomass can be used as soil amendment, processed into livestock feed (Valix et al., 2004; Cao and Harris, 2010; Lu et al., 2010), or converted into usable energy through other pathways. In China, plant energy research has focused mostly on bioethanol and biogas production (Wilkie and Evans, 2010).

Biomass is one of the largest sustainable energy sources in the world. The utilization of biomass for energy production has gained increasing popularity in some countries (Karaosmanoglu et al., 2000) because it can reduce the risk of energy shortage. Biochar is a pyrogenic carbon-rich material produced from waste biomass, in particular agricultural wastes such as corn, sugarcane bagasse, and peanuts (Kameyama et al., 2011; Yuan et al., 2011). Many studies have evaluated the use of biochar as adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals, pathogens, and other pollutants in wastewater. Xu et al. (2013) showed that biochar derived from dairy manure was effective for removing heavy metals, e.g., Pb, Cu, Zn, or Cd, from wastewater. Mohan et al. (2007) found that oak bark char could significantly remove Pb2+ and Cd2+. Chun et al. (2004) reported that crop residue-derived chars in agricultural soils served as a potential medium for retaining organic contaminants. However, research on nutrient removal, particularly ammonium and phosphate from water by biochar, is limited (Hossain et al., 2011; Yao et al., 2011a).

In this study, we investigated ammonium and phosphate sorption by selective biochar derived from four phytoremediation plants, Salix rosthornii Seemen, T. dealbata, V. zizanioides, and Phragmites sp., which were subjected to different temperatures (500, 600, and 700 °C) through slow pyrolysis. Our objectives were to compare the physicochemical characteristics of biochars derived at different temperatures and to evaluate the potential of pyrolyzed biochar for ammonium and phosphate removal from aqueous solution.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials and preparation

The biochar samples used in this study were produced from four plants: S. rosthornii Seemen, T. dealbata, V. zizanioides, and Phragmites sp. S. rosthornii was collected from the Huajiachi Campus, Zhejiang University, China. The other three plants were collected from the Qingshanhu constructed wetland, Lin’an, China. The plants were air-dried in a greenhouse for 7 d, and then ground and passed through a 1-mm sieve. The powder was dried at 105 °C for 24 h prior to carbonization and activation treatment.

Carbonization: Biochar powder was first pyrolyzed to 500 °C in a furnace (KBF11Q, Zhengguang, China) under N2 atmosphere at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min and incubated at the peak temperature for 2 h before cooling down to room temperature.

Activation: Four types of carbonized biochar were further pyrolyzed to three different temperatures (500, 600, and 700 °C) in CO2 atmosphere under the same conditions (heating rate of 5 °C/min for 2 h).

The resulting biochars were cooled to room temperature in the CO2 atmosphere. Twelve products were obtained (Table 1): SC500, SC600, SC700 (S. rosthornii Seemen), TC500, TC600, TC700 (T. dealbate), VC500, VC600, VC700 (V. zizanioidees), PC500, PC600, and PC700 (Phragmites sp.).

Table 1.

Physicochemical properties of biochar derived from four plants under different pyrolysis temperatures

Biochar Temp. (°C) pH Yield (%) CEC (mmol/kg) Surface area (m2/g)
C (%) H (%) N (%) Available P (g/kg) Ca (g/kg) Mg (g/kg) Fe (g/kg) Al (g/kg)
N2 CO2
SC500 500 10.77 27.62 234.7 243.77 361.81 75.35 2.63 1.27 0.65 20.18 0.94 0.44 0.32
SC600 600 10.80 26.84 118.3 324.25 399.98 83.61 2.26 1.26 0.48 20.52 1.19 0.40 0.30
SC700 700 10.89 24.48 61.4 448.29 495.62 84.60 1.66 1.28 0.42 21.69 1.43 0.46 0.36
TC500 500 10.39 31.98 312.3 3.57 114.11 75.08 2.59 3.43 1.56 18.34 3.57 0.59 0.32
TC600 600 10.49 31.08 288.2 17.53 287.95 74.48 2.02 2.98 1.74 18.10 3.43 0.42 0.29
TC700 700 10.64 22.81 195.7 223.08 228.33 57.08 2.21 2.31 3.11 19.66 4.42 0.64 0.44
VC500 500 10.27 31.51 210.7 83.01 354.13 77.66 2.77 1.62 0.84 16.51 1.49 0.86 0.78
VC600 600 10.56 30.60 157.1 266.23 401.44 82.15 2.23 1.82 0.34 17.04 1.57 0.90 0.74
VC700 700 10.74 28.21 143.6 362.27 483.12 83.29 1.67 1.85 0.42 17.99 1.51 0.82 0.68
PC500 500 10.20 33.59 218.0 107.82 287.51 66.92 2.42 4.10 0.83 18.18 1.65 0.52 0.40
PC600 600 10.35 33.52 129.4 226.25 341.24 69.33 1.83 3.42 0.56 18.28 1.72 0.54 0.53
PC700 700 10.98 29.32 172.4 301.24 424.63 66.66 1.45 3.05 0.79 19.47 1.79 0.59 0.44

SC: S. rosthornii Seemen; TC: T. dealbata; VC: V. zizanioides; PC: Phragmites sp.; CEC: cation exchange capacity

2.2. Biochar properties

Elemental CHN analyses were performed using a CHN elemental analyzer (Flash-EA112, Thermo Finnigan). Available P was determined by the Olsen method using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Lambda 35, PerkinElmer). Ca, Mg, Fe, and Al were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; 7500a, Agilent). The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was measured by the method of Schollenberger and Simon (1945).

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis (Nicolet 6700) of the biochar was performed to identify the surface functional groups. The biochars were analyzed by infrared spectroscopy between 400 and 4 000 cm−1, with 50 scans being taken at 2 cm−1 resolution. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; SU1510, Hitachi) was used to compare the structures and surface characteristics of the four biochar samples. The pH of the biochar was measured by adding biochar to deionized water at a mass/water ratio of 1:20 (Inyang et al., 2012). The solution was then manually shaken and allowed to stand for 5 min before the pH was measured.

The specific surface area of biochar was determined by N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K and by CO2 isotherms at 273 K using a Quadrasorb Si-MP surface area analyzer, N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method for mesopore-enclosed surfaces and CO2 adsorption isotherms at 273 K using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) for micropore-enclosed (<1.5 nm) surfaces (Yao et al., 2011a; Inyang et al., 2012).

2.3. Sorption experiments

Ammonium and phosphate solutions were prepared by dissolving NH4Cl and K2HPO4 in deionized water. Adsorption isotherms of ammonium and phosphate from their individual solutions were determined using batch experiments in triplicate. A total of 0.2 g adsorbent was added to 50 ml of ammonium or phosphate solution. The initial pH for each sorption solution was adjusted to 7 prior to the sorption experiments. The vessels were shaken at 200 r/min in a mechanical shaker for 24 h at room temperature, and the final suspensions were centrifuged, filtered, and stored at room temperature until analysis. The sorbed amount was calculated from the difference between the initial and final concentrations of the nutrient in the solution.

To evaluate the sorption capacity for environmental treatment, removal rates of ammonium and phosphate were measured with 0.2 g of each adsorbent added into 30 mg N/L and 30 mg P/L solutions, respectively. Removal rates were calculated based on the initial and final aqueous concentrations.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The data of sorption of ammonium and phosphate were described by analyses of regression. Other statistical analyses were conducted using the programs of Origins 8.0. The error bars represent standard deviation (SD), calculated from triplicate data.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Biochar characterization

Biochar yield decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature (Table 1). The biochar yields of the four plant biomasses SC, TC, VC, and PC were 24.48%–27.62%, 22.81%–31.98%, 28.21%–31.51%, and 29.32%–33.59%, respectively, when activated at different temperatures. These production rates are comparable, or greater than commonly used plant materials such as olive husk and corncob produced at the same temperatures (Demirbas, 2004). Therefore, the biomasses of the four plant species can be good candidates for biochar feedstock.

CHN analysis revealed that for the same biochar material, as the activation temperature increased, the yield rate gradually decreased because of the degradation of remaining carbonized material. Carbon contents generally increased, whereas H and O contents decreased with increasing activation temperature, indicating an increased degree of carbonization of the biochar (Chun et al., 2004). However, the C content of TC700 decreased along with the increasing temperature, probably because more ash is produced at higher temperatures. The Ca content of all biochar was similar, regardless of temperature, but TC had a high content of available P and Mg, approximately three times greater than the other biochar. It is likely T. dealbata has a greater capacity for uptake and accumulation of P and Mg.

Surface areas generally increased with increasing temperature. Although N2 is widely used as a standard probe gas for surface area measurement, N2 is unable to reach the internal microporosity associated with materials such as biochar, kerogen, and humic substances (Pignatello et al., 2006). The surface area determined by CO2 was higher than that determined by N2 because CO2 diffuses more easily at 273 K and has a smaller molecular size than N2 (Pignatello et al., 2006). The BET method relies on several assumptions that may not be true for microporous materials with very narrow pores and ultrahigh surface areas (Walton and Snurr, 2007). The modern approach, which involves the application of NLDFT, provides a more reliable size analysis of both micropores and mesopores (Ravikovitch and Neimark, 2001). Therefore, the CO2 (NLDFT) method should be more adequate for determining the surface area of biochar (Pignatello et al., 2006; Yao et al., 2011a). Biochar (SC, PC, and VC) and TC700 had a large N2 surface area, indicating the presence of mesopores (Yao et al., 2011a). The N2-determined surface areas of TC500 (3.57 m2/g) and TC600 (17.53 m2/g) were much lower than the corresponding CO2-determined values (114.11 and 287.95 m2/g), indicating that TC500 and TC600 have been dominated by micropores. TC600 had a larger surface area than TC500, for more micropores of TC were developed with increasing temperature, while TC700 has some mesopores because the high temperature destroyed the microstructure.

The infrared spectra of the adsorbents (Fig. 1) revealed their complex chemical bonding consisting of different organic structures. The spectra of SC600, VC600, and PC600 were of similar shapes (aromatic C=O, C=C 1616 cm−1, –CH2– 1400 cm−1, CO and CC stretching 1117 cm−1, and furan γ-CH 875 cm−1), but were different from the TC600 spectrum, which had more peaks, e.g., the aliphatic C–O–C functional groups of cellulose at 1043 cm−1 and carbohydrate C–O at 990 cm−1 (Uchimiya et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2011). The bands for aliphatic CH2 groups in TC600 at 1440 and 1400 cm−1 indicate that TC600 has more nonpolar groups. Peaks at 1616, 1440, 1400, and 1043 cm−1 were preserved in TC600 but absent from TC600+NH4 and TC600+P (after reaction with ammonia and phosphate, respectively), indicating that the functional groups (e.g., CH2, C–O–C) had reacted with NH4Cl and K2HPO4. Fig. 2 shows the SEM images of TC600 before and after ammonium and phosphate sorption. The SEM image of TC600 showed that the T. dealbata biochar had a smooth surface (Fig. 2a), which is consistent with the surface area measurements by the two different methods, indicating that its surface area was dominated by micropores. From the SEM images as shown in Figs. 2b and 2c, no significant differences were found between TC600, TC600+P, and TC600+NH4.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of biochar (600 °C) before and after reaction with ammonia or phosphate within the wavenumbers of 700–2000 cm−1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

SEM images of TC600 before and after reaction with ammonia or phosphate

(a) TC600; (b) TC600+NH4; (c) TC600+P

Glaser et al. (2002) assumed that formation of carboxylic groups by oxidation on the edges of the aromatic backbone of biochar was responsible for increased CEC. Some basic properties in the biochars can be attributed to the presence of basic functional groups (Pulido-Novicio et al., 2001; Kameyama et al., 2011). Chun et al. (2004) found a decrease in acidic functional groups and an increase in basic functional groups with increasing pyrolysis temperature. This phenomenon may have contributed to the lower CEC of biochar activated at higher temperatures. We found that the CEC of all of the biochar decreased when the activation temperature increased. In general, TC had the highest CEC of all the plant biochar at the same temperature. CEC decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature, which might be induced by the thermolysis of cellulose and lignin at high temperatures and the presence of basic functional groups.

3.2. Sorption isotherms

The biochar of TC showed a very rapid increase in ammonium and phosphate sorption isotherms. The Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models were used to describe the sorption of ammonium and phosphate into the biochar, which are expressed respectively as

Inline graphic,
Inline graphic,

where Q e is the amount of adsorbate adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g), C e is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L), K is the relative adsorption capacity constant of the adsorbent (mg/g), N is the intensity of the adsorption constant, Q max is the monolayer maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), and b is the affinity coefficient.

Figs. 3a–3c show the ammonium adsorption isotherms for SC, VC, TC, and PC at different temperatures. The corresponding Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm parameters and correlation coefficients are given in Table 2. The correlation coefficients (R 2) of the Freundlich model are comparable to those of the Langmuir model, but the Freundlich model fits the data slightly better than the Langmuir model with the exception of T. dealbata. The Langmuir maximum capacity of TC700 was 17.579 mg/g, which is higher than that of other adsorbents for the sorption of ammonium from aqueous solutions. Based on the Freundlich affinity coefficient (K), TC had a higher affinity for ammonium than SC, VC, and PC at the same temperature. This result is consistent with the maximum adsorption capacity. With the increase in temperature, the sorption capacity of all adsorbents increased.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Sorption isotherms of ammonia (a, b, c) and phosphate (d, e, f) at different temperatures

(a) and (d) at 500°C, (b) and (e) at 600°C, (c) and (f) at 700 °C

Table 2.

Parameters obtained from Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for ammonium sorption on different biochars

Biochar Freundlich model
Langmuir model
K (mg/g) N R 2 Q max (mg/g) b (L/mg) R 2
SC500 0.088 0.598 0.697 3.31 0.008 0.625
SC600 0.022 0.850 0.984 7.43 0.002 0.982
SC700 0.020 0.854 0.994 6.61 0.002 0.993
TC500 0.636 0.458 0.925 7.49 0.030 0.980
TC600 0.487 0.561 0.958 11.2 0.016 0.993
TC700 0.483 0.636 0.937 17.6 0.012 0.975
VC500 0.104 0.517 0.587 1.87 0.018 0.520
VC600 0.070 0.634 0.865 3.12 0.008 0.847
VC700 0.162 0.567 0.888 4.36 0.012 0.852
PC500 0.110 0.519 0.986 2.21 0.014 0.957
PC600 0.107 0.550 0.897 2.43 0.016 0.958
PC700 0.253 0.547 0.907 5.43 0.016 0.899

SC: S. rosthornii Seemen; TC: T. dealbata; VC: V. zizanioides; PC: Phragmites sp.

Sorption isotherms of phosphate by biochar activated at different temperatures are presented in Figs. 3d–3f. TC700 had the greatest sorption capacity. Some isotherms of SC, VC, and PC showed negative values at lower concentration ranges, potentially because the biochar released some available P into the solution, resulting in lower initial concentrations than equilibrium concentrations. Hence, we analyzed Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm constants for TC only (Table 3). The isotherm for phosphate fits the Langmuir model much better, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.947 to 0.964. This result differs from previous reports showing that phosphate sorption fits the Freundlich isotherm better than does the Langmuir model because of phosphate precipitation (Yao et al., 2011a). This discrepancy is possibly due to phosphate released from the biochar, which resulted in lower equilibrium values of adsorbed phosphate (Q e).

Table 3.

Parameters obtained from the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms for phosphate sorption by TC biochar*

Biochar Freundlich model
Langmuir model
K (mg/g) N R 2 Q max (mg/g) b (L/mg) R 2
TC500 0.689 0.301 0.792 2.54 0.215 0.964
TC600 0.867 0283 0.761 2.86 0.338 0.953
TC700 0.094 0.741 0.921 4.96 0.011 0.947
*

Data were not shown for SC, VC, and PC due to their low sorption capacity

3.3. Sorption of ammonium

Removal rates of ammonium (30 mg N/L) by TC500, TC600, and TC700 were (33.38±0.7)%, (37.28±2.2)%, and (37.84±3.2)%, respectively (Fig. 4a). The removal rates observed for TC were higher as compared to other adsorbents, indicating that TC has a greater ammonium sorption capacity. Chemical interaction may dominate physical sorption (different kinds of plant biochar at the same temperature) because the sorption capacity of TC was much greater than that of the other adsorbents at the same temperature despite the lower specific surface area of TC (Table 1).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of ammonia (a) and phosphate (b) removal rates by different adsorbents

Initial concentrations of N and P are both 30 mg/L. Data are expressed as mean±SD, n=3. SC: S. rosthornii Seemen; TC: T. dealbata; VC: V. zizanioides; PC: Phragmites sp.

It is widely recognized that biochar can be used as a soil amendment in agriculture. Most previous studies found that biochar addition increased soil CEC to retain nutrients (e.g., K, Ca, and NH4 +) (Glaser et al., 2002; Lehmann et al., 2003; Liang et al., 2006). The consistent correlation of ammonium sorption capacities and CEC of the tested biochar indicates that cation exchange dominated in ammonium removal (Ding et al., 2010). As predicted from the previous observations, SC700, which has a lower CEC than VC700 and PC700, had the lowest removal rate despite having the largest surface area of the three biochars. This result confirms previous conclusions that, with the same activation temperature, CEC is the most important factor for ammonium sorption. However, with an increase in activation temperature for biochar from a given plant, both the surface area and ammonium removal rates increased, while CEC decreased, indicating that factors other than CEC, such as surface area, also affect sorption.

TC700 is the best material for ammonium removal (Fig. 4a) among the test biochar. However, TC600 had a similar ammonium removal rate to TC700, and the yield of TC600 was much higher than TC700 (Table 1). Although VC700 and PC700 had a greater specific surface area, they had a comparable yield and slightly lower removal rates for NH4-N, as compared with TC600. In addition, extra energy is required to produce VC700 and PC700. Therefore, TC600 should be more economical for application of ammonium removal among the tested biochar.

3.4. Sorption of phosphate

Sorption of phosphate from aqueous solutions is generally governed by the surface functional group, surface area of the adsorbent and metal-ion complex formation. Previous studies have demonstrated that the surface of the biochar is often negatively charged, making it repel negatively charged ions such as phosphate (Eberhardt et al., 2006; Yao et al., 2011a), suggesting that the sorption of phosphate via surface chemistry should be minimal. Similar to the above results for ammonium, TC, which has the lowest specific surface area, has the highest sorption capacity among all tested biochar pyrolyzed at the same temperature, suggesting that for different kinds of plant biochar under the same temperature, the surface area was not the main factor in phosphate sorption.

Under alkaline conditions, the presence of Ca and Mg cations favors precipitation with phosphate (Gerritse, 1993; Arias et al., 2001). For SC500, VC500, and PC500, with similar CEC and Ca content (Table 1), no removal of phosphate was observed, suggesting that Ca is insignificant in phosphate removal. This observation is consistent with Yao et al. (2011b), based on the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of original and P-loaded biochar, that the precipitation of P with Ca may not be an important mechanism for phosphate removal because some Ca in biochar was present on its surface in the form of calcite, which has a low solubility, and Ca trapped inside the biochar could not be released into the solution. TC has the highest Mg content by a factor of three (Table 1). The greater phosphate removal by TC was probably due to its Mg content (Yao et al., 2011a), which can precipitate phosphate in aqueous solutions.

TC had a greater phosphate sorption capacity than the other adsorbents but released some phosphate back into the solution (Fig. 4b), which is in line with Yao et al. (2011a). The removal value is in dynamic equilibrium between release and surface precipitation of P. High removal could be explained mainly by surface precipitation, and the available P may be responsible for phosphate release. TC samples that contained a higher available P had a higher P removal rate, indicating that surface precipitation of P is greater than the release of P in TC. On the contrary, in SC, VC, PC, the surface precipitation of P is smaller than the release of available P. With an increase in temperature from 500 to 700 °C, the amount of phosphate that SC, VC, and PC release back into the solution became negligible. Some adsorbents (VC700 and TC700) only removed a small amount of phosphate (3.03% and 1.80%, respectively). For biochar derived from a given plant, the surface area increased with the activation temperature, but the Mg content remained relatively constant (Table 1). Therefore, changes in phosphate removal are likely caused by interactions with the surface area, in the same plant biochar. The highest phosphate removal rate for TC, 38.12%, was observed when the biochar was activated at 600 °C. The same material activated at 700 °C had a lower phosphate removal rate, possibly because of the higher available P present in the biochar (Table 1). Thus, TC600 is the best material for removing phosphate from aqueous solutions among the tested biochars.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the ability of biochar derived from four different phytoremediation plants to adsorb ammonium and phosphate from aqueous solutions. Physicochemical properties of the biochar, such as pH, surface area, and CEC, changed depending on the temperature at which the biochars were activated. In general, the removal rate rose as the activation temperature increased. Biochar derived from T. dealbata had the highest sorption capacity of all the plant biochar. Residue from T. dealbata can be used as a feed stock for biochar production. Considering the yields, high adsorption and energy cost, T. dealbata activated at a temperature of 600 °C (TC600) is the best adsorbent for removing phosphate and ammonium from aqueous solutions, which makes it of great interest in water eutrophication control. Though we performed the research using artificial wastewater, we believe the high removal efficiencies of ammonia and phosphate by biochars will provide more in-situ wastewater treatment opportunities.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Erica HARTMANN (Arizona State University, USA) and Dr. Teng ZENG (Yale University, USA) for reviewing the manuscript.

Footnotes

*

Project supported by the International Cooperative Project from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2010DFB33960), the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (No. 2012BAC17B02), the Zhejiang Youth Creative Program (No. 2012QNA6004), and the Key Project from Zhejiang Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2011C13015), China

Compliance with ethics guidelines: Zheng ZENG, Song-da ZHANG, Ting-qiang LI, Feng-liang ZHAO, Zhen-li HE, He-ping ZHAO, Xiao-e YANG, Hai-long WANG, Jing ZHAO, and Muhammad Tariq RAFIQ declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

  • 1.Abe K, Ozaki Y. Comparison of useful terrestrial and aquatic plant species for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from domestic wastewater. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 1998;44(4):599–607. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1998.10414483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arias C, Del Bubba M, Brix H. Phosphorus removal by sands for use as media in subsurface flow constructed reed beds. Water Res. 2001;35(5):1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00368-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brix H. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(5):11–18. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00047-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cao X, Harris W. Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101(14):5222–5228. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiou CT, Xing B. Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(17):4649–4655. doi: 10.1021/es035034w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Conley DJ, Paerl HW, Howarth RW, Boesch DF, Seitzinger SP, Havens KE, Lancelot C, Likens GE. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science. 2009;323(5917):1014–1015. doi: 10.1126/science.1167755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Demirbas A. Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2004;72(2):243–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2004.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ding Y, Liu YX, Wu WX, Shi DZ, Yang M, Zhong ZK. Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010;213(1-4):47–55. doi: 10.1007/s11270-010-0366-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eberhardt TL, Min SH, Han JS. Phosphate removal by refined aspen wood fiber treated with carboxymethyl cellulose and ferrous chloride. Bioresource Technol. 2006;97(18):2371–2376. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gerritse RG. Prediction of travel times of phosphate in soils at a disposal site for wastewater. Water Res. 1993;27(2):263–267. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(93)90084-U. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fert Soils. 2002;35(4):219–230. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hossain MK, Strezov V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manage. 2011;92(1):223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman AR, Pullammanappallil P, Cao X. Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass. Bioresource Technol. 2012;110:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Shiono T, Shinogi Y. Influence of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar application on nitrate leaching in calcaric dark red soil. J Environ Qual. 2011;41(4):1131–1137. doi: 10.2134/jeq2010.0453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karaosmanoglu F, Işigigür-Ergüdenler A, Sever A. Biochar from the straw-stalk of rapeseed plant. Energy Fuels. 2000;14(2):336–339. doi: 10.1021/ef9901138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kumar S, Loganathan VA, Gupta RB, Barnett MO. An assessment of U(VI) removal from groundwater using biochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization. J Environ Manage. 2011;92(10):2504–2512. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Jr, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil. 2003;249(2):343–357. doi: 10.1023/A:1022833116184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O′Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizão FJ, Petersen J. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2006;70(5):1719–1730. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lu Q, He ZL, Graetz DA, Stoffella PJ, Yang X. Phytoremediation to remove nutrients and improve eutrophic stormwaters using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2010;17(1):84–96. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0094-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mohan D, Pittman CU, Bricka M, Smith F, Yancey B, Mohammad J, Steele PH, Alexandre-Franco MF, Gómez-Serrano V, Gong H. Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J Coll Interf Sci. 2007;310(1):57–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pignatello JJ, Kwon S, Lu Y. Effect of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): attenuation of surface activity by humic and fulvic acids. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(24):7757–7763. doi: 10.1021/es061307m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pulido-Novicio L, Hata T, Kurimoto Y, Doi S, Ishihara S, Imamura Y. Adsorption capacities and related characteristics of wood charcoals carbonized using a one-step or two-step process. J Wood Sci. 2001;47(1):48–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00776645. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV. Characterization of nanoporous materials from adsorption and desorption isotherms. Coll Surface A. 2001;187-188:11–21. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00614-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schollenberger C, Simon R. Determination of exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in soil-ammonium acetate method. Soil Sci. 1945;59(1):13–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seo BS, Park CM, Song U, Park WJ. Nitrate and phosphate removal potentials of three willow species and a bald cypress from eutrophic aquatic environment. Landscape Ecol Eng. 2010;6(2):211–217. doi: 10.1007/s11355-009-0102-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Thomas Klasson K, Chang SC, Wartelle LH, Rodgers JE. Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(9):5538–5544. doi: 10.1021/jf9044217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Valipour A, Kalyan Raman V, Ghole VS. A new approach in wetland systems for domestic wastewater treatment using Phragmites sp. Ecol Eng. 2009;35(12):1797–1803. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Valix M, Cheung W, Mckay G. Preparation of activated carbon using low temperature carbonisation and physical activation of high ash raw bagasse for acid dye adsorption. Chemosphere. 2004;56(5):493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Walton KS, Snurr RQ. Applicability of the BET method for determining surface areas of microporous metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(27):8552–8556. doi: 10.1021/ja071174k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wilkie AC, Evans JM. Aquatic plants: an opportunity feedstock in the age of bioenergy. Biofuels. 2010;1(2):311–321. doi: 10.4155/bfs.10.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xu X, Cao X, Zhao L, Wang H, Yu H, Gao B. Removal of Cu, Zn, and Cd from aqueous solutions by the dairy manure-derived biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20(1):358–368. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-0873-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang X, Wu X, Hao H, He Z. Mechanisms and assessment of water eutrophication. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2008;9(3):197–209. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0710626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao X, Pullammanappallil P, Yang L. Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(10):6273–6278. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao X, Pullammanappallil P, Yang L. Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings. J Hazard Mater. 2011;190(1-3):501–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H. The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(3):3488–3497. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao F, Yang W, Zeng Z, Li H, Yang X, He Z, Gu B, Rafiq MT, Peng H. Nutrient removal efficiency and biomass production of different bioenergy plants in hypereutrophic water. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;42:212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B are provided here courtesy of Zhejiang University Press

RESOURCES