Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jul 11;0:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.001. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.001

Differential role of ventral tegmental area acetylcholine and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors in cocaine-seeking

Wojciech Solecki a, Robert J Wickham a,b, Shay Behrens a, Jie Wang c,d, Blake Zwerling a, Graeme F Mason a,c, Nii A Addy a,b,e,*
PMCID: PMC3865076  NIHMSID: NIHMS504619  PMID: 23850572

Abstract

Exposure to drug-associated cues evokes drug-seeking behavior and is regarded as a major cause of relapse. Cues evoke burst firing of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons and phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). Cholinergic and glutamatergic input to the VTA is suggested to gate phasic DA activity. However, the role of VTA cholinergic and glutamatergic receptors in regulating phasic dopamine release and cue-induced drug-seeking in cocaine experienced subjects is not known. In male Sprague-Dawley rats, we found that VTA inactivation strongly inhibited, while VTA stimulation promoted, cocaine-seeking behavior during early withdrawal. Blockade of phasic activated D1 receptors in the NAc core also strongly inhibited cue-induced cocaine-seeking - suggesting an important role of phasic DA activity in the VTA to NAc core circuit. Next, we examined the role of VTA acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) in regulating both NAc core phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking. In cocaine naïve subjects, VTA infusion of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antagonist mecamylamine, the muscarinic AChR antagonist scopolamine, or the NMDAR antagonist AP-5, led to robust attenuation of phasic DA release in the NAc core. During early cocaine withdrawal, VTA infusion of AP-5 had limited effects on NAc phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking while VTA infusion of mecamylamine or scopolamine robustly inhibited both phasic DA release and cocaine-seeking. The results demonstrate that VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs, strongly regulate cue-induced cocaine-seeking and phasic DA release during early cocaine withdrawal.

Keywords: Drug-seeking, NMDA, acetylcholine, phasic dopamine, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens

1. Introduction

Exposure to drug-associated cues is a major precipitant of drug-relapse in humans (Rohsenow et al., 1990; Shaham and Hope, 2005; Shaham et al., 2003). Clinical studies of cue-induced cocaine craving suggest the involvement of dopamine (DA) neurotransmission within the mesolimbic DA system (Berger et al., 1996; Goldstein et al., 2009; Kranzler and Bauer, 1992; Potenza et al., 2012; Robbins et al., 1992; Volkow et al., 2010a; Volkow et al., 2006; Volkow et al., 2010b; Wang et al., 1999). Specifically, dopaminergic activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is necessary and sufficient to drive reward-seeking in the presence of reward-predictive cues (Nicola et al., 2005). However, the underlying mechanisms that regulate DA activity and cue-induced drug-seeking behavior are poorly understood.

Recent findings have demonstrated that conditioned stimuli (CS) evoke time-locked burst firing of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) DA neurons and subsequent phasic DA release in the NAc (Ito et al., 2000; Kalivas and McFarland, 2003; Nicola et al., 2005; Schultz, 2007; See et al., 2001; Weiss et al., 2000). It has been proposed that CS-induced phasic DA release in NAc serves as a signal to modulate on-going behavior, as the NAc is known to integrate cortical and limbic input and to guide motor action (Kalivas and McFarland, 2003). Indeed, VTA-evoked phasic DA release in the NAc is sufficient to promote reward-seeking behavior (Adamantidis et al., 2011). Further, CS-evoked phasic DA signaling in the NAc diminishes and is eventually eliminated during extinction - an effect accompanied by a decline in goal-directed behavior (Owesson-White et al., 2008; Stuber et al., 2005). In contrast, cue-induced reinstatement of reward-seeking is accompanied by the return of CS-evoked DA transients to pre-extinction amplitudes (Owesson-White et al., 2008; Stuber et al., 2005). Together, these observations suggest a crucial role of VTA DA burst firing and subsequent NAc phasic DA release in cue-mediated reward-seeking behavior. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that regulate phasic DA release can provide novel insight of the underlying mechanisms that control CS-induced cocaine-seeking.

CS-evoked DA release and neuronal activity in the NAc depends upon VTA activity (Sombers et al., 2009; Yun et al., 2004). Burst firing of VTA DA neurons and subsequent NAc DA release is modulated by excitatory afferents from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) and the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (LDTg), both implicated in processing CS-related sensory information to DA neurons (Lester et al., 2008; Lodge and Grace, 2006; Zweifel et al., 2009).

LDTg inputs to the VTA are thought to act as an essential gate that allows DA neurons to transition from tonic to burst firing (Kitai et al., 1999; Lodge and Grace, 2006; Maskos, 2008). Thus, LDTg cholinergic and glutamatergic input into the VTA, and therefore VTA AChRs and NMDARs, may play a critical role in regulating both phasic DA release and cue-induced drug-seeking.

While recent studies have begun to elucidate a role for VTA AChRs and NMDARs in modulating phasic DA release in a drug-naïve state (Blaha et al., 1996; Lester et al., 2008; Wickham et al., 2013, in press), the role of these VTA receptors in regulating phasic DA release during cocaine-withdrawal is unknown. Given the demonstrated alterations in VTA NMDAR levels after cocaine self-administration and withdrawal (Ghasemzadeh et al., 2011; Hemby et al., 2005; Lu et al., 2003), it is likely that NMDAR regulation of phasic DA release is altered during cocaine withdrawal and such alterations could have a profound influence on cue-mediated behavior. While previous studies have also highlighted the ability of AChR mechanisms to mediate the pharmacological and reinforcing effects of cocaine (Fink-Jensen et al., 2003; Ranaldi and Woolverton, 2002; Rasmussen et al., 2000; Zachariou et al., 2001; Zanetti et al., 2006; Zanetti et al., 2007), the role of AChRs in cue-induced cocaine-seeking is not well understood. The aim of our study was to determine the role of the VTA AChRs and NMDARs in regulating NAc core phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking behavior in cocaine-withdrawn rats. Our novel findings demonstrate that after cocaine self-administration and protracted abstinence 1) NMDAR regulation of phasic DA release is greatly diminished and 2) both phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking are potently regulated by VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Animals

Male Sprague Dawley rats (250-270 g; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) (2 to 4 per cage prior to surgery and singly housed after surgery) were housed under a 12 hour light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were conducted according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Throughout the experiments, animals were monitored daily and efforts were made to minimize animal pain, distress or discomfort, as specified by the Yale University IACUC approved protocol.

2.2 Drugs

All drugs were dissolved in sterile saline and delivered in a 0.5 μL volume over 1 min via micro-infusion pump and syringe (25 gauge, Hamilton, Reno, NE, USA). Lidocaine (Lid; 0.82 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mecamylamine (Mec; 3 or 30 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MS, USA), scopolamine (Scop; 3 or 67 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MS, USA) or AP-5 (0.1 or 1 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MS, USA) were locally infused into the VTA. Muscimol (Musc; 0.003 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and baclofen (Bacl; 0.06 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were delivered in a cocktail at 0.25 μL each (0.5 μL total volume of Musc+Bacl cocktail) into the LDTg. SCH23390 (SCH; 1 or 2 μg; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MS, USA) was locally infused into the NAc core. The internal cannula extended 1 mm beyond the cannula to target either the VTA or NAc core or 2 mm to target the LDTg. Drug doses were chosen based on their ability to inactivate discrete brain regions (Lasseter et al., 2011) or to modulate phasic DA release in the NAc core (Sombers et al., 2009; Wickham et al., 2013, in press) and reward-related behavior (Yeomans and Baptista, 1997). The SCH doses were based on the ability of these doses to alter behavioral responding to reward-predictive cues (Calaminus and Hauber, 2007).

2.3 Cocaine self-administration

Rats were anesthetized with ketamine HCl (100 mg/kg, ip, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and xylazine (10 mg/kg, ip, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and implanted with a silastic catheter in the external jugular vein, as described by others (McFarland and Kalivas, 2001). Following catheter implantation, bilateral cannula (Plastics 1, Roanoke, VA, USA) were stereotaxically implanted above the VTA (AP −5.3 mm, ML ±0.5 mm, DV −7.0 mm from dura), LDTg (AP −8.6 mm, ML ±0.8 mm from Bregma, DV −4.6 mm from dura), or the NAc core (AP + 1.2 mm, ML + 1.5 mm, DV −6.5). Cocaine self-administration training started after 7 days of surgical recovery and was preceded by 2-3 days of food restriction to ~90% of free feeding body levels. Rats were trained under fixed ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement during which each active lever depression led to intravenous cocaine infusion (0.18 mg over a 6 s, ~0.5 mg/kg) and conditioned stimulus (CS) cue presentation (tone + stimulus light for 6s) in standard operant chambers, illuminated by a house light (Med Associate, St. Albans, USA). Inactive lever depressions had no programmed consequences. Each rat received 2 h daily training sessions for 8-10 consecutive days. Acquisition of stable self-administration behavior was defined as less than 15% variability in total active lever pressing over 3 consecutive days. Animals that did not acquire stable self-administration behavior were excluded from the study and were not tested for cue-induced cocaine-seeking.

2.4 Cue-induced cocaine-seeking

After cocaine self-administration training, rats underwent 3 days of forced abstinence in their home cages (Fig. 1A). On withdrawal day 3 (WD3) animals were placed in operant chambers for 2 h where active lever depression led to the CS presentation alone with no cocaine delivery. Inactive lever depressions had no programmed consequences. Cue-induced cocaine-seeking tests were performed on WD3 to avoid confounds from a potential extinction burst on WD1. Intra-VTA infusion of Lid, Mec, Scop or AP-5, intra-LDTg infusion of Musc+Bacl, or NAc core infusion of SCH was performed immediately prior to the cue-induced cocaine-seeking (Fig. 1B; Tab.1). In a separate experiment on WD10, the effects of intra-VTA Mec, Scop and AP-5 administration on locomotion were studied in the open field test (described below). To study the role of VTA-dependent phasic DA release in the NAc core in cocaine-seeking during abstinence, we applied phasic-like electrical stimulation to the VTA during the cocaine-seeking test and compared operant responding in cocaine-withdrawn rats vs. saline-withdrawn controls (described in detail in supplementary materials). Briefly, cocaine-withdrawn or saline-withdrawn rats with implanted VTA stimulation electrode were placed in the operant chamber for a 1 h session. During the session, phasic-like electrical stimulation of the VTA (125 - 150 μA, 24 pulses at 60Hz) was applied every 120s. During the session, every active lever press led to CS presentation in the absence of cocaine delivery. Inactive lever depressions had no programmed consequences. In this experiment, Saline-withdrawn rats served as the control group

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Time-line of behavioral and electrochemical experiments. (A) Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine (~0.5mg/kg/inf) for 8 days, after which they underwent forced abstinence for 3 days. (B) On withdrawal day 3 (WD3), rats were tested for cue-induced cocaine-seeking during which active lever depression led to presentation of the cocaine-paired cue alone with no cocaine delivery. Intra-LDTg, VTA or NAc core drug micro-infusions were performed immediately prior to behavioral testing. (C) Fast scan cyclic voltammetry was performed in the NAc core of cocaine-naïve or cocaine-withdrawn, anesthetized rats. NAc phasic dopamine release, evoked by electrical VTA stimulation (300 μA, 60Hz, 24 pulses with a 4 ms pulse width, delivered every 3 min) was measured before (baseline) and after (drug) VTA micro-infusion of saline, mecamylamine, scopolamine or AP-5. The pre-drug baseline period consisted of NAc phasic DA recordings performed over a 15 min period. Sagittal brain images adopted from Paxinos and Watson (2007).

Table 1.

Behavioral testing. VTA, LDTg, and NAc core drug micro-infusion were performed on withdrawal day 3 (WD3) in rats previously trained in cocaine-self administration. In addition, the effects of phasic stimulation of the VTA were evaluated in cocaine-withdrawn rats (denoted by *). Cue-induced cocaine-seeking during phasic VTA stimulation was performed during WD3-WD20 testing.

Training Withdrawal day 3
testing
Brain region Manipulation
Cocaine
SA
Cue-induced
cocaine-seeking
VTA Lidocaine (0, 0.82 μg)
Phasic stimulation*
Cocaine
SA
Cue-induced
cocaine-seeking
LDTg Muscimol (0, 0.03 μg) +
baclofen (0, 0.3 μg)
Cocaine
SA
Cue-induced
cocaine-seeking
NAc core SCH23390: (0, 1 or 2 μg)
Cocaine
SA
Cue-induced
cocaine-seeking
VTA Mecamylamine (0, 3, 30
μg)
Scopolamine (0, 3, 67 μg)
AP-5 (0, 0.1, 1 μg)

2.5 Locomotor activity

On WD10, all rats from the cue-induced cocaine-seeking studies were tested for locomotor activity after intra-VTA drug micro-infusion. In addition, rats that were never trained in cocaine self-administration (due to non-patent catheters) or rats that did not meet criteria for cocaine self-administration were also tested in the open field test as additional control subjects that were VTA drug naive. Immediately after intra-VTA Mec, Scop or AP-5 micro-infusion rats were placed in the middle of a brightly lit open field apparatus (black Plexiglass 40 × 40 cm arena with 60cm high opaque Plexiglass walls). Velocity and distance travelled were assessed using video recoring and the Ethovision analysis program (Noldus Inc, USA). There were no statistical differences in locomotor activity (both before and after drug treatment) between rats previously tested in cue-induced cocaine-seeking and rats that were never trained or did not finished training for cocaine self-administration (data not shown), therefore locomotor activity data after intra-VTA drug administration was collapsed and analyzed irrespective of previous cocaine exposure.

2.6 Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV)

FSCV recording was performed on WD3 in rats that had previously self-administered cocaine and in cocaine-naïve age-matched controls (Fig. 1A, C). Rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg, ip.) and placed in a stereotaxic frame equipped with a heating pad (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA). A bipolar, stainless-steel stimulating electrode, coupled with a 26 gauge infusion cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA), was placed into the VTA (AP −5.2 mm, ML +0.5 to −1.5 mm, DV between −7.4 and −8.1 mm), a carbon-fiber microelectrode (described in the supplementary text) was implanted in the NAc core (AP +1.2 mm, ML −1.4 mm, DV from −6.2 to 6.9 mm) and a Ag/Ag Cl reference electrode was placed in contralateral hemisphere (Fig. 1C). A low-pass filtered (2 kHz) triangular waveform (−0.4 to +1.3 V and back to −0.4 V at a rate of 400 V/s, repeated at 100 ms intervals) was applied to the carbon fiber microelectrode. Data was digitized and processed using NI-6711 and NI-6251 DAC/ADC cards (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) and Demon Voltammetry and Analysis Software (Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC) or Tarheel CV software (ESA, Chelmsford, MA, USA). Background-subtracted cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were obtained by digitally subtracting stable background currents to resolve CVs for dopamine. Electrical pulses delivered to the VTA were computer-generated with a 6711 PCI card (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) and were optically-isolated from the electrochemical system (NL 800A, Neurolog, Digitimer Ltd, Hertfordshire, UK). Electrical stimulation consisted of biphasic square wave pulses (300 μA, 24 pulses with a 4ms pulse width, applied at 60Hz). For each 15 sec FSCV collection, electrical stimulation of the VTA was applied 5 sec after the initiation of the FSCV recording session. VTA stimulation and simultaneous FSCV recordings, at the carbon-fiber microelectrode in the NAc, were performed with a 3 min wait time between each session to prevent the depletion of readily releasable stores and to allow sufficient time for releasable stores to return to baseline. Once VTA-stimulated DA was detected in the NAc core, at least 6 baseline VTA stimulation and FSCV recording samples were collected to ensure the stability of stimulated DA release. We considered the evoked DA signal to be stable when peak evoked DA concentrations varied by less than 10% over a 15 min period. Immediately after the last baseline FSCV recording, an internal cannula was inserted into the VTA cannula to infuse drug at the site of VTA electrical stimulation. Drug was micro-infused into the VTA (see Table 2) at a rate of 0.5 μL/min for 1 min and the internal cannula was left in place for an additional 1 min to allow for complete drug absorption. Then, the internal cannula was removed and post-drug VTA-stimulation and FSCV recoding files were collected at 3 min intervals (Fig 1C).

Table 2.

Fast scan cyclic voltammetry. VTA drug micro-infusions and phasic DA release in the NAc core after VTA stimulation were performed in both cocaine-naïve rats and in rats that underwent cocaine-self-administration training and subsequent 3 day withdrawal.

Training Withdrawal day 3
(WD3) testing
Recording
site
Infusion
site
Manipulation
Cocaine
naïve
FSCV in
anesthetized rat
NAc core VTA Mecamylamine (0, 30 μg)
Scopolamine (0, 67 μg)
AP-5 (0, 1 μg)
Cocaine
SA
FSCV in
anesthetized rat
NAc core VTA Mecamylamine (0, 30 μg)
Scopolamine (0, 67 μg)
AP-5 (0, 1 μg)

2.7 Histology

At the completion of behavioral experiments, 0.5 μl of Chicago Blue Dye was infused into the LDTg, VTA or NAc core of the anesthetized rat. Rats were then sacrificed and brains were removed from the skull, frozen in chilled isopentane and stored at −80°C. Brains were coronally sectioned into 100-1000 μm thick slices with a 1 mm brain matrix or by hand. Sections were mounted on slides and viewed under a light microscope to verify cannula placements. All data from subjects with misplaced cannula were removed from the analysis (Table S1). Representative cannula placements are shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Representative (A) LDTg, (B) VTA and (C) NAc core micro-infusion cannula placements as well as (D) NAc core carbon fiber placements (Adopted from (Paxinos and Watson, 2007)). All coordinates for the VTA and NAc core were obtained from the rat brain atlas by Paxinos and Watson, 2007.

After the FSCV experiments, rats were sacrificed and brains were removed from the skull and stored in 10% formaldehyde. Brains were coronally sectioned into 40–50 μm slices with a cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The sections were mounted on slides and viewed under a light microscope to verify working electrode placements. Representative cannula placements for micro-infusion experiments are shown in Fig 6A-C. Representative working electrode placements from FSCV experiments are shown in Fig. 6D.

2.8 Statistics

The effects of intra-VTA, intra-LDTg or intra-NAc core drug administration on total lever presses during the 2 h cue-induced cocaine-seeking test were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. If the two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect, a Newman Keuls post-hoc comparison was performed. For analysis of drug infusion effects on lever pressing or locomotor activity over time, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed. If the two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect or a significant interaction, a subsequent Newman Keuls post-hoc analysis of discrete time points was performed. For locomotor activity, time-dependent analysis was measured in 5 min bins over the entire 2 h session. For all tests (active lever responses, inactive lever responses, and locomotor activity), there were no significant differences between treatment groups after the initial 60 minutes of the session, therefore time course data is reported for only first hour.

Data obtained with FSCV in anesthetized rats is presented as the effects of intra-VTA saline or drug infusion on the peak of stimulated phasic dopamine release ([DAmax]). We used Demon Voltammetry for data collection and analysis. Saline and drug data is normalized [DAmax] reponse in the 15 minute baseline period directly preceding the infusion. We considered the evoked dopamine signal to be stable when the variation over the 15 minute period was less than 10%. Time-dependent intra-VTA drug administration effects on phasic DA release in the NAc core were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures with Newman Keuls post hoc comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests.

3. Results

3.1 VTA activity regulates cue-induced cocaine-seeking during abstinence

To study the role VTA activity in cue-induced cocaine-seeking we used local lidocaine micro-infusion to inactivate both cell bodies and projecting/passing fibers in the VTA. Inactivation of the VTA (n=6) attenuated cue-induced cocaine seeking, as shown by selective attenuation of active, but not inactive, lever pressing in Lid treated animals over the 2 h session (Fig. 2A; treatment × lever: F(1, 20)=9.9, p<0.01, post hoc test p<0.001). These effects were not due to previous differences during training, as “to be saline” (n=6) and “to be Lid” (n=6) subjects showed no significant between-group differences during cocaine self-administration training (Fig. S1A). However, closer examination of Lid effects over time revealed that intra-VTA Lid administration significantly attenuated active and inactive lever pressing during the first 20 min of the WD3 test (Fig.S2A, B; treatment × time: F(23, 460)=2.7, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.05). Thus, to determine the potential causal link between VTA phasic activity (which evokes phasic DA release in the NAc (Fig 4D, (Phillips et al., 2003)) and cocaine-seeking during abstinence, we examined the effects of VTA phasic-like stimulation on cocaine-seeking in withdrawn subjects. The data revealed that phasic VTA stimulation led to a time-locked increase in active lever pressing in cocaine trained subjects (Fig. 2B; F(5, 47)=2.7, p<0.05, post hoc test; p<0.05), but not saline trained rats (Fig. S4H; n.s.). Importantly, the observed increase in responding was selective for the active, but not inactive, lever responding in cocaine rats (Fig. S4I, stim × drug × lever interaction: F(1, 20)=4.4, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.05). Thus, phasic-like stimulation of the VTA promoted cocaine-seeking in cocaine withdrawn subjects.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The VTA to NAc core circuitry regulates cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine withdrawn rats. (A) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of lidocaine (Lid; 0.82 μg/side) but not saline (Sal) abolished cue-induced cocaine-seeking in abstinent rats (two-way ANOVA: treatment × lever: p<0.01). In contrast, (B) phasic stimulation of the VTA (150 μA, 60Hz, 24 pulses electrical stimulation), which leads to phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens, facilitated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in first 20 s epoch after stimulation in cocaine-trained, abstinent rats (one way ANOVA: p < 0.05). (C). Intra-LDTg micro-infusion of a muscimol and baclofen cocktail (0.003 μg/side Musc + 0.06 μg/side Bacl) but not saline (Sal) attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking on WD3 (two-way ANOVA: treatment: p<0.01). (D) Intra-NAc core micro-infusion of SCH23390 (SCH, 0, 1, 2 μg/side) attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking (two-way ANOVA: treatment × lever: p<0.05). Data presented as the mean + SEM. *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Locomotor activity after VTA infusion of nAChR, mAChR or NMDAR antagonists in doses that attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking on WD3. Intra-VTA micro-infusion of the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (Mec; 30 μg/side), mAChR antagonist scopolamine (Scop; 67 μg/side) or NMDAR antagonist AP-5 (1 μg/side) in comparison to saline (Sal) led to no significant differences on locomotor activity as measured by distance traveled (A, B; drug: F(3.27)=1.1, p=0.3; time: F(23, 621)=10.2, p<0.0001, drug × time: F(69, 621)=0.9, p=0.5) or velocity (C, D; drug: F(3.27)=1.1, p=0.3; time: F(23, 621)=207.4, p<0.0001, drug × time: F(69, 621)=0.7, p=0.9) during 2h of the open field test. Data presented as the mean + SEM.

The LDTg sends excitatory projections to the VTA that regulate phasic DA signaling in NAc (Lammel et al., 2012). Inactivation of the LDTg with Musc + Bacl (n=6) attenuated both active and inactive lever responding during the 2 h session in cocaine-abstinent rats on WD3 (Fig. 2C; treatment: F(1, 26)=11.9, p<0.01, post hoc test p<0.01; lever: F(1, 26)=36.4, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.001). Examination of 5 min epochs during the 2 h session revealed that Musc + Bacl significantly attenuated active and inactive responding during first 10 min (Fig. S2C, D; treatment × time: F(23, 621)=1.9, p<0.01, post hoc test p<0.001). Importantly, the observed intra-LDTg Musc + Bacl effects on cue-induced cocaine seeking were not due to pre-existing differences during cocaine self-administration training, since “to be saline” subjects (n=9) and “to be Musc + Bacl” animals showed no significant between-group differences during training (Fig. S1B). However, given that LDTg inactivation led to a non-specific decrease in active and inactive lever pressing during cue-induced cocaine-seeking, subsequent experiments with pharmacological inhibition of VTA AChRs and NMDARs was used as an alternative method to determine the potential role that LDTg inputs may exert by acting at these receptors in the VTA.

3.2 Intra-NAc core infusion of a D1R antagonist attenuates cue-induced cocaine-seeking

SCH (1 or 2 μg) administration into the NAc core selectively attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking, as reflected by a decrease in active lever presses (Fig. 2G; dose × lever: F(1, 34)=4,5, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.01) and no significant effect on inactive lever responding. Time-dependent analysis of cue-induced cocaine-seeking revealed that 1 μg SCH attenuated active but not inactive lever responding during the initial 15 min, whereas 2 μg SCH attenuate active lever responding during first 10 min of the session (Fig. S2E, F; dose × time × lever: F(46, 782)=5.5, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.01). During cocaine self-administration training, there were no significant differences between “to be saline” and “to be SCH” groups (Fig. S1C).

3.3 Blockade of VTA nAChRs, mAChRs or NMDARs attenuates cue-induced cocaine seeking

Intra-VTA administration of Mec attenuated cue-induced cocaine seeking in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A; dose × lever: F(2, 52)=7.9, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.001), with the highest Mec dose (30 μg/side) effectively abolishing cocaine-seeking (p<0.001). Examination of Mec effects over time revealed attenuated operant responding on both active and inactive levers during first 10 min after Mec 30 μg (Fig. S3A, B; dose × time: F(46, 1104)=1.6, p<0.01, post hoc test p<0.001) and 5 min after Mec 3 μg micro-infusion (p<0.05). Intra-VTA administration of Scop attenuated both active and inactive lever responding in cocaine-withdrawn rats on WD3 in dose-response manner (Fig. 3B; dose: F(2, 48)=4.3, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.01; lever: F(1, 48)=35.3, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.001; dose × lever: n.s.). Closer examination of cue-induced cocaine-seeking revealed that 67 μg Scop micro-infusion attenuated operant responding during first 10 min (Fig. S3C, D; dose × time: F(46, 828)=2.4, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.001), whereas 3 μg Scop micro-infusion attenuated responding during the first 5 min of the session (p<0.05). Intra-VTA administration AP-5 at either dose did not attenuate cue-induced cocaine seeking assessed over 2 h (Fig. 3C; n.s.). However, time-dependent analysis revealed that 1 μg AP-5 attenuated active lever responding during the first 5 min (Fig. S3E,F; dose × lever × time: F(46, 1104)=1.4, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.001). Importantly, during cocaine self-administration training in all experiments, the number of active lever presses in “to be Sal” subjects did not statistically differ from “to be drug” subjects (Fig. S1D, Mec; Fig. S1E, Scop, Fig. S1F, AP-5). To control for potential non-specific effects associated with VTA drug-infusion, locomotor activity was subsequently measured on WD10 following VTA infusion. The data showed that intra-VTA administration of Mec, Scop or AP-5 had no significant effect on distance traveled (Fig. 4A, B; no effect of drug: F(3.27)=1.1, p=0.3, main effect of time: F(23, 621)=10.2, p<0.0001, drug × time: F(69, 621)=0.9, p=0.5), or velocity (Fig. 4C, D; no effect of drug: F(3.27)=1.1, p=0.3; main effect of time: F(23, 621)=207.4, p<0.0001, drug × time: F(69, 621)=0.7, p=0.9)) measured during 2h open field test.

Fig.3.

Fig.3

VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs, are potent modulators of cue-induced cocaine-seeking. (A) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (Mec; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) abolished cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine-withdrawn rats in a dose-dependent manner (two-way ANOVA: dose × lever: p<0.001). (B) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of mAChR antagonist scopolamine (Scop; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in dose-response manner (two-way ANOVA: dose: p<0.05; lever: p<0.001). (C) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of NMDAR antagonist AP-5 (0, 0.1, 1 μg/side) had no effect on cue-induced cocaine-seeking when measured over 120 min of testing (two-way ANOVA: dose n.s.). Data presented as the mean + SEM. *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

3.4 Differential effects of VTA nAChR, mAChR and NMDAR blockade on phasic DA release in the NAc core after cocaine self-administration and withdrawal

Intra-VTA administration of Mec (n=6), Scop (n=5) or AP-5 (n=6) in doses that attenuated cue-induced cocaine-seeking on WD3 (30 μg, 67 μg and 1 μg, respectively) decreased DAmax in the NAc core of cocaine-naïve rats (Fig. 5A; drug: F(3.20)=13.2, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.01). The VTA drugs effects on DAmax in the NAc core remained attenuated during entire 120 min (n.s. time and drug × time factors). Intra-VTA administration of Sal (n=7) had no effect on stimulated phasic DA release when compared to pre-infusion phasic DA release, whereas intra-VTA Mec, Scop or AP-5 decreased DA release in the NAc core 40-50% (Fig. 5B; representative traces).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs, are potent modulators of phasic DA release in the NA core after cocaine self-administration and 3 day withdrawal as measured by fast scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV). (A) Time course of DAmax response in the NAc core after saline (Sal), mecamylamine (Mec, 30 μg), scopolamine (Scop, 67 μg) and AP-5 (1 μg) intra-VTA micro-infusion in cocaine-naïve rats. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a significant drug treatment factor (p<0.001). Data are presented as the mean + SEM of the peak of stimulated phasic dopamine release (DAmax) and are shown for initial 15 min of the FSCV recording. There were no differences between experimental groups during second hour of testing. Saline and drug data was normalized to the baseline evoked dopamine signal obtained during a 15 min period directly preceding the infusion. (B) Representative DA traces vs. time plots during the baseline period (black) and after intra-VTA drug micro-infusion (grey) in cocaine-naïve rats. The triangle indicates the time of VTA stimulation. (C) Time course of DAmax response in the NAc core after intra-VTA micro-infusion (Sal; 30 μg Mec; 67 μg Scop; or 1 μg AP-5) in rats following cocaine-self administration training and 3 day withdrawal. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a significant effect of drug treatment (p<0.001) and post hoc comparison showed significant attenuation of phasic DA release by Mec and Scop (p<0.01), but not AP-5 (n.s.). (D) Representative DA vs. time traces during the baseline period (black) and after intra-VTA drug micro-infusions (grey) in cocaine-withdrawn rats. (E) Comparison of VTA receptor regulation of phasic DA release (DAmax) in the NAc core in the 15 min period immediately following infusion in cocaine-naïve versus cocaine-withdrawn rats. (F) Cocaine self-administration in rats subsequently tested in fast scan cyclic voltammetry on WD3 revealed no significant between-group differences self-administration training. During the FSCV test on WD3, rats from “to be sal” group received intra-VTA microinfusion of saline, whereas to be Mec, Scop and AP-5 subjects received mecamylamine (Mec, 30 μg), scopolamine (Scop, 67 μg) and AP-5 (1 μg), respectively. ** p<0.01, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

Interestingly, in cocaine-withdrawn rats, intra VTA AP-5 administration did not alter phasic DA release over a 2 h period when compared to the saline treated control group (Fig. 5C; drug: F(3.663)=6.9, p<0.001, post hoc test n.s.). In contrast, intra-VTA Mec or Scop in cocaine withdrawn rats decreased phasic DA release (p<0.01) similar to what was observed in cocaine-naïve rats (Fig 5A, C). We also observed a significant effect of time, as revealed by a main effect of time irrespective of the intra-VTA drug treatment in cocaine-withdrawn rats (time: F(39.663)=2.5, p<0.001, post hoc test p<0.05 for 3 vs. 78 min, and 3 vs. 108 min). In order to directly compare intra-VTA drug effects on phasic DA release in cocaine naïve and cocaine-withdrawn rats, we binned data over the first 15 min, where intra-VTA Mec, Scop and AP-5 had the most robust effects on cue-induced cocaine-seeking (Fig. S2). While intra-VTA infusion of Mec, Scop or AP-5 all attenuated phasic DA release similarly in cocaine-naive rats, only Mec and Scop attenuated DA release in cocaine-withdrawn rats (Fig. 5E; drug × cocaine treatment F(3.41)=3.1, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.01). In contrast, intra-VTA AP-5 micro-infusion had no effect on electrically-evoked phasic DA release in NAc core in cocaine-withdrawn rats (n.s.). This lack of an AP-5 effect could not be attributed to pre-existing differences in cocaine self-administration since “to be AP-5” subjects trained similarly to all other groups in cocaine self-administration (Fig 5F).

4. Discussion

Here, our data shows that activity in the VTA to NAc core circuit, via regulation of phasic DA release, plays an important role in cue-induced cocaine-seeking. We also find that cue-induced cocaine-seeking and phasic DA signaling after cocaine self-administration and subsequent abstinence is potently regulated by VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs. Specifically, contingent cocaine exposure followed by early withdrawal decreases the ability of VTA NMDAR manipulation to alter phasic DA release in NAc, revealing a diminished role of NMDARs in regulating phasic DA during early cocaine withdrawal.

Dopaminergic activity in the VTA to NAc circuit is necessary and sufficient to drive cue-induced reward-seeking in rats (Nicola et al., 2005) and CS-evoked burst firing of VTA DA neurons and the subsequent phasic DA release in the NAc is proposed to underlie reward-seeking (Day et al., 2007; Nicola et al., 2005; Phillips et al., 2003). Mechanistically, VTA DA burst firing and NAc phasic DA release are regulated by VTA ACh and glutamate input from the LDTg (Lester et al., 2008; Lodge and Grace, 2006) and recent work suggests a critical role of the LDTg to VTA circuit in reward-related behavior (Lammel et al., 2012). Indeed, selective optogenetic stimulation of LDTg inputs into the VTA is sufficient to induce a conditioned place preference through downstream actions at phasic activated D1 receptors in the NAc (Lammel et al., 2012). Phasic DA release preferentially activates low affinity D1R receptors, leading to the activation of the direct pathway of the basal ganglia (Goto and Grace, 2005). Consistent with a role of phasic activated D1 receptors in the NAc, we found that intra-NAc core infusion of SCH, to block D1Rs, abolished cue-induced cocaine-seeking. Even though phasic DA release preferentially activates D1 receptors (Goto and Grace, 2005), our findings do not eliminate the possibility that D2 receptor mechanism in the NAc may also contribute to cue-induced cocaine-seeking. Thus, future work will further delineate whether the ability of phasic DA activity to promote cocaine-seeking is mediated by NAc core D1 receptors, D2 receptors or both. Importantly, despite the evidence for LDTg regulation of phasic DA activity in the VTA and NAc (Lester et al., 2008; Lodge and Grace, 2006), the potential role of LDTg mechanisms in cue-induced cocaine-seeking had not been previously examined. Here, we find that transient inactivation of the LDTg decreases both active and inactive lever responding during cue-induced cocaine-seeking, revealing a non-specific effect of global LDTg inactivation. However, it is possible that cell-specific projections from the LDTg to VTA (either glutamatergic or cholinergic) may play a more specific role in cue-induced cocaine-seeking behavior during withdrawal.

The majority of the neurons in the LDTg and the majority of the LDTg projections to the VTA are glutamatergic (Lammel et al., 2012), suggesting that LDTg projections could alter DA burst firing through actions at glutamate receptors in the VTA. Importantly, VTA DA burst firing is dependent on NMDAR, and not AMPA receptor, activity (Chergui et al., 1993; Overton and Clark, 1992; Suaud-Chagny et al., 1992). Furthermore, genetic and FSCV studies point to VTA NMDARs as potent modulators of both phasic DA signaling and cue-mediated behavior (Sombers et al., 2009; Zweifel et al., 2011; Zweifel et al., 2009). Previous studies have also demonstrated that both acute cocaine and chronic contingent cocaine-taking induce persistent neuroadaptations in the VTA, as evidenced by an increased AMPA/NMDA ratio, enhanced DA excitability, and altered expression of NMDARs after early and prolonged withdrawal (Chen et al., 2008; Ghasemzadeh et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2003; Luscher and Malenka, 2011; Stuber et al., 2010; Ungless et al., 2001). However, the consequence of cocaine-induced neuroadaptations on VTA NMDAR-dependent phasic DA signaling was not known. Our data revealed that intra-VTA micro-infusion of AP-5, despite having long-lasting effects on phasic DA release in cocaine-naïve rats, had minimal effects on phasic DA release in cocaine-withdrawn rats. We also observed a transient AP-5 effect on cue-induced cocaine-seeking on WD3. We propose that VTA NMDAR-dependent regulation of phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking is diminished due to VTA neuroadaptations during early cocaine withdrawal. Consistent with this interpretation, previous studies showed that extended-access cocaine self-administration and subsequent protracted abstinence led to decreased post-synaptic NMDAR NR1 expression in the VTA (Ghasemzadeh et al., 2011), while acute VTA AP-5 infusion did not alter cue-induced reinstatement following 7 day extinction (Mahler et al., 2012). This diminished role of NMDARs does not eliminate the possibility that AMPARs, or mGluRs, may alter NAc phasic DA release during cocaine-withdrawal. Indeed, both AMPAR and mGluR antagonists have been demonstrated to attenuate cue-induced cocaine-seeking after extinction training (Kumaresan et al., 2009; Mahler et al., 2013). Thus, future studies will examine whether these behavioral effects are mediated by AMPAR or mGluR regulation of NAc phasic DA release. In contrast to the lack of an NMDAR effect, our data revealed that VTA AChR regulation of phasic DA and cocaine-seeking is maintained during early withdrawal.

Previous clinical studies showed that mecamylamine decreased, whereas nicotine augmented, cue-induced cocaine craving in addicted individuals (Reid et al., 1999; Reid et al., 1998). However, the critical CNS locus for AChR regulation of cue-induced cocaine craving had not been previously identified. Our data point to VTA nAChRs as key targets that regulate cue-induced cocaine-seeking. Here we show that intra-VTA micro-infusion of the nonselective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine attenuated NAc phasic DA release and abolished cue-induced cocaine-seeking. Importantly, this inhibition of cue-induced cocaine-seeking was observed in the absence of mecamylamine effects on locomotor activity. Consistent with this suggested role of VTA nAChR regulation of cue-induced drug-seeking, previous work has shown that VTA nAChR blockade attenuates the reinforcing properties of ethanol cues (Lof et al., 2007). In addition, increasing VTA cholinergic tone increases cue-induced heroin-seeking in rats (Zhou et al., 2007). We propose that VTA nAChRs regulate behavioral responses to drug-associated CSs through the regulation of downstream phasic DA release. Indeed, our FSCV experiments demonstrated that intra-VTA mecamylamine micro-infusion in both cocaine naïve and cocaine-withdrawn rats potently attenuated NAc core phasic DA release. Mechanistically, AChRs on axon terminals and DA cell bodies in the VTA are well-positioned to modulate DA release in the NAc (Maskos, 2008). Accordingly, intra-VTA micro-infusion of scopolamine also attenuated phasic DA release in the NAc core of both cocaine naïve and cocaine-withdrawn rats. Our FSCV results are consistent with previous findings showing the involvement of the VTA nAChRs and mAChRs in phasic DA release in cocaine-naïve subjects (Blaha et al., 1996) and extend these findings to the cocaine-withdrawn state. Importantly, scopolamine effects on cue-induced cocaine-seeking and locomotor activity are similar to the effects of mecamylamine, further supporting the hypothesis that VTA cholinergic neurotransmission that regulates phasic DA signaling underlies cue-induced cocaine-seeking.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate a novel functional dissociation between VTA AChRs and NMDARs and their ability to regulate phasic DA release and cue-induced cocaine-seeking during early withdrawal. In addition, contingent cocaine-taking followed by short abstinence induces functional changes in the VTA receptor mechanisms that regulate phasic DA release and these neuroadaptations may play an important role in compulsive cocaine-seeking. We propose that salient, cocaine-paired cues evoke VTA DA neuronal activity and subsequent phasic DA release in the NAc core that drives cocaine-seeking during abstinence. We further propose that VTA ACh activity may serve as a functional gate that allows cues to evoke phasic DA release and drive drug-seeking behavior. Together, our data provide new insight of the cholinergic mechanisms that underlie cue-induced cocaine-seeking behavior.

Supplementary Material

01
02
03

Fig. S1. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration across drug treatments. Acquisition of stable self-administration behavior was defined as less than 15% variability in total active lever pressing over 3 consecutive days. Prior to VTA drug administration on withdrawal day 3, there were no pre-existing differences in the acquisition of cocaine self-administration behavior between rats in the “to be Sal” and (A) “to be lid” groups; treatment: F(1, 80)=0.003, p=0.9; time: F(8, 80)=8.2, p<0.001; treatment × time: F(8, 80)=1.4, p=0.2), (B) “to be Musc + Bacl” treatment: F(1, 91)=0.03, p=0.8; time: F(7, 91)=5.2, p<0.001; treatment × time: F(7, 91)=1.2, p=0.3), (C) “to be SCH” dose: F(2, 119)=1.6, p=0.2; time: F(7, 119)=18.7, p<0.001; dose × time: F(7, 119)=0.6, p=0.8), (D) “to be Mec” dose: F(2, 168)=0.1, p=0.9; time: F(7, 168)=11.7, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 168)=0.9, p=0.5), (E) “to be Scop” dose: F(2, 182)=1.04, p=0.4; time: F(7, 182)=17.8, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 186)=1.1, p=0.4) or (F) “to be AP-5” dose: F(2, 161)=0.2, p=0.8; time: F(7, 161)=15.9, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 161)=0.4, p=0.9) subjects.

04

Fig. S2. The VTA to NAc core circuit regulates cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine withdrawn rats. (A, B) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of lidocaine (Lid; 0.82 μg/side) but not saline (Sal) attenuated active (A) and inactive (B) lever responding throughout the first 20 min of cueinduced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; treatment × time, p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.05). (C, D) Intra-LDTg micro-infusion of a muscimol and baclofen cocktail (0.003 μg/side Musc + 0.06 μg/side Bacl) but not saline (Sal) attenuated active (C) and inactive (D) lever responding throughout 10 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; treatment × time, p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.05). (E, F) Intra-NAc core micro-infusion of SCH23390 attenuated active (E) but not inactive (F) lever responding during the initial 15 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing for 1 μg/side SCH and initial 10 min for 2 μg/side SCH (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × lever × time, p<0.01 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.01). Data presented as the mean + SEM. There were no significant differences between treatment groups after the initial 60 min, therefore time course data, showed on panel B and F, is reported for only first hour. *** p<0.001; * p<0.05, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

05

Fig. S3. VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs, are potent modulators of cue-induced cocaine-seeking. (A, B) Intra-VTA microinfusion of the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (Mec; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) attenuated active (A) and inactive (B) lever responding during the initial 5 min (3 μg/side Mec; two-way ANOVA with repeated measures dose × time: p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test p<0.05) or 10 min (30 μg/side Mec, p<0.001) of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing. (C, D) Intra-VTA microinfusion of mAChR antagonist scopolamine (Scop; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) attenuated active (C) and inactive (D) lever responding during the initial 5 min (3 μg/side Scop; two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × time: p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test p<0.05) or 10 min (67 μg/side Scop; p<0.001) of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing. (E, F) Intra-VTA microinfusion of 1 μg/side of NMDAR antagonist AP- 5 but 0.1 μg/side or saline (Sal) attenuated active (E) but not inactive (F) lever responding during initial 5 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × lever × time: p<0.05 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.001). Data presented as the mean + SEM. There were no differences between experimental groups during second hour of testing, therefore data is shown for first 1h of the cue-induced cocaine-seeking test. ***p<0.001, * p<0.05, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

06

Fig. S4. Phasic VTA stimulation facilitated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine-trained but not saline-trained abstinent rats. Cocaine-trained rats demonstrated acquisition and maintenance of cocaine self-administration behavior during (A) autoshaping, (B) self-administration and (C) retraining after cannulation surgery. Saline-trained rats showed little responding on either the active or inactive lever during autoshaping (D), self-administration (E) or retraining (F) after cannulation surgery. (G) Cocaine-trained rats, compared to saline-trained rats, showed increased cocaine-seeking during 1 h of testing with VTA stimulation (two-way ANOVA; drug: F(1, 20)=6.6, p<0.05; lever: F(1, 20)=3.7, p=0.06; drug × lever interaction: F(1, 20)=4.9, p<0.05; post hoc test; p<0.05). Phasic stimulation of the VTA (125-150 μA, 60Hz, 24 pulses electrical stimulation), which leads to phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens, facilitated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in first 20 s epoch after stimulation in cocaine-trained (as shown in Fig 2B) but not (H) saline-trained, abstinent rats. (I) Phasic VTA stimulation during 1 h cue-induced cocaineseeking led to increased active, but not inactive, lever presses during the 20s time period immediately after VTA stimulation in rats previously trained in cocaine self-administration. In contrast, phasic VTA stimulation had no significant effect in saline-trained rats (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; stim × drug × lever interaction: F(1, 20)=4.4, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.05). Data presented as the mean + SEM. ** for p<0.01, * for p<0.05.

  • We examined cue-induced cocaine-seeking in rats after 3 days of forced abstinence

  • VTA NMDARs and AChRs regulate phasic dopamine release in cocaine naïve rats

  • Cocaine withdrawal limits VTA NMDAR regulation of phasic dopamine release

  • VTA AChRs regulate cocaine-seeking and phasic dopamine during early withdrawal

Acknowledgements

We thank Colin Bond for technical assistance with histological verification. We also thank Dr. Jane Taylor for excellent feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported by the NIH (R21 AA018210 to GFM, R21 AA019803 and R01 DA021785 to JW and GFM), the Natural National Science Foundation of China (Y2Z1141001 to JW), a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (RJW) and the NHLBI-NIH support of the Yale Biomedical Science Training and Enrichment Program (SB).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Adamantidis AR, Tsai HC, Boutrel B, Zhang F, Stuber GD, Budygin EA, Tourino C, Bonci A, Deisseroth K, de Lecea L. Optogenetic interrogation of dopaminergic modulation of the multiple phases of reward-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2011;31:10829–10835. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2246-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger SP, Hall S, Mickalian JD, Reid MS, Crawford CA, Delucchi K, Carr K. Haloperidol antagonism of cue-elicited cocaine craving. Lancet. 1996;347:504–508. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91139-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blaha CD, Allen LF, Das S, Inglis WL, Latimer MP, Vincent SR, Winn P. Modulation of dopamine efflux in the nucleus accumbens after cholinergic stimulation of the ventral tegmental area in intact, pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned, and laterodorsal tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats. J Neurosci. 1996;16:714–722. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-02-00714.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calaminus C, Hauber W. Intact discrimination reversal learning but slowed responding to reward-predictive cues after dopamine D1 and D2 receptor blockade in the nucleus accumbens of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;191:551–566. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0532-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen BT, Bowers MS, Martin M, Hopf FW, Guillory AM, Carelli RM, Chou JK, Bonci A. Cocaine but not natural reward self-administration nor passive cocaine infusion produces persistent LTP in the VTA. Neuron. 2008;59:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chergui K, Charlety PJ, Akaoka H, Saunier CF, Brunet JL, Buda M, Svensson TH, Chouvet G. Tonic activation of NMDA receptors causes spontaneous burst discharge of rat midbrain dopamine neurons in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 1993;5:137–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Day JJ, Roitman MF, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1020–1028. doi: 10.1038/nn1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fink-Jensen A, Fedorova I, Wortwein G, Woldbye DP, Rasmussen T, Thomsen M, Bolwig TG, Knitowski KM, McKinzie DL, Yamada M, Wess J, Basile A. Role for M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci Res. 2003;74:91–96. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ghasemzadeh MB, Vasudevan P, Giles C, Purgianto A, Seubert C, Mantsch JR. Glutamatergic plasticity in medial prefrontal cortex and ventral tegmental area following extended-access cocaine self-administration. Brain Res. 2011;1413:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein RZ, Tomasi D, Alia-Klein N, Honorio Carrillo J, Maloney T, Woicik PA, Wang R, Telang F, Volkow ND. Dopaminergic response to drug words in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci. 2009;29:6001–6006. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4247-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goto Y, Grace AA. Dopamine-dependent interactions between limbic and prefrontal cortical plasticity in the nucleus accumbens: disruption by cocaine sensitization. Neuron. 2005;47:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hemby SE, Horman B, Tang W. Differential regulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits following cocaine self-administration. Brain Res. 2005;1064:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.09.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ito R, Dalley JW, Howes SR, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Dissociation in conditioned dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core and shell in response to cocaine cues and during cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7489–7495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-19-07489.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalivas PW, McFarland K. Brain circuitry and the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003;168:44–56. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1393-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitai ST, Shepard PD, Callaway JC, Scroggs R. Afferent modulation of dopamine neuron firing patterns. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:690–697. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00040-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kranzler HR, Bauer LO. Bromocriptine and cocaine cue reactivity in cocaine-dependent patients. Br J Addict. 1992;87:1537–1548. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02661.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumaresan V, Yuan M, Yee J, Famous KR, Anderson SM, Schmidt HD, Pierce RC. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists attenuate cocaine priming- and cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking. Behav Brain Res. 2009;202:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lammel S, Lim BK, Ran C, Huang KW, Betley MJ, Tye KM, Deisseroth K, Malenka RC. Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area. Nature. 2012;491:212–217. doi: 10.1038/nature11527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lasseter HC, Wells AM, Xie X, Fuchs RA. Interaction of the basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex is critical for drug context-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:711–720. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lester DB, Miller AD, Pate TD, Blaha CD. Midbrain acetylcholine and glutamate receptors modulate accumbal dopamine release. Neuroreport. 2008;19:991–995. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283036e5e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lodge DJ, Grace AA. The laterodorsal tegmentum is essential for burst firing of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5167–5172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510715103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lof E, Olausson P, deBejczy A, Stomberg R, McIntosh JM, Taylor JR, Soderpalm B. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area mediate the dopamine activating and reinforcing properties of ethanol cues. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;195:333–343. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0899-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu L, Grimm JW, Shaham Y, Hope BT. Molecular neuroadaptations in the accumbens and ventral tegmental area during the first 90 days of forced abstinence from cocaine self-administration in rats. J Neurochem. 2003;85:1604–1613. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01824.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luscher C, Malenka RC. Drug-evoked synaptic plasticity in addiction: from molecular changes to circuit remodeling. Neuron. 2011;69:650–663. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mahler SV, Smith RJ, Aston-Jones G. Interactions between VTA orexin and glutamate in cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2012 doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2681-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahler SV, Smith RJ, Aston-Jones G. Interactions between VTA orexin and glutamate in cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013 doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2681-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maskos U. The cholinergic mesopontine tegmentum is a relatively neglected nicotinic master modulator of the dopaminergic system: relevance to drugs of abuse and pathology. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153(Suppl 1):S438–445. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McFarland K, Kalivas PW. The circuitry mediating cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2001;21:8655–8663. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08655.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicola SM, Taha SA, Kim SW, Fields HL. Nucleus accumbens dopamine release is necessary and sufficient to promote the behavioral response to reward-predictive cues. Neuroscience. 2005;135:1025–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Overton P, Clark D. Iontophoretically administered drugs acting at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor modulate burst firing in A9 dopamine neurons in the rat. Synapse. 1992;10:131–140. doi: 10.1002/syn.890100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Owesson-White CA, Cheer JF, Beyene M, Carelli RM, Wightman RM. Dynamic changes in accumbens dopamine correlate with learning during intracranial self-stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11957–11962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803896105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Paxinos G, Watson C. Elsevier; London: 2007. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Phillips PE, Stuber GD, Heien ML, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Subsecond dopamine release promotes cocaine seeking. Nature. 2003;422:614–618. doi: 10.1038/nature01476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Potenza MN, Hong KI, Lacadie CM, Fulbright RK, Tuit KL, Sinha R. Neural correlates of stress-induced and cue-induced drug craving: influences of sex and cocaine dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:406–414. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ranaldi R, Woolverton WL. Self-administration of cocaine: scopolamine combinations by rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;161:442–448. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rasmussen T, Sauerberg P, Nielsen EB, Swedberg MD, Thomsen C, Sheardown MJ, Jeppesen L, Calligaro DO, DeLapp NW, Whitesitt C, Ward JS, Shannon HE, Bymaster FP, Fink-Jensen A. Muscarinic receptor agonists decrease cocaine self-administration rates in drug-naive mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;402:241–246. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00442-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reid MS, Mickalian JD, Delucchi KL, Berger SP. A nicotine antagonist, mecamylamine, reduces cue-induced cocaine craving in cocaine-dependent subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;20:297–307. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(98)00076-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reid MS, Mickalian JD, Delucchi KL, Hall SM, Berger SP. An acute dose of nicotine enhances cue-induced cocaine craving. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;49:95–104. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00144-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN, Childress AR, O’Brien CP. Using cue reactivity to screen medications for cocaine abuse: a test of amantadine hydrochloride. Addict Behav. 1992;17:491–499. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90009-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rohsenow DJ, Niaura RS, Childress AR, Abrams DB, Monti PM. Cue reactivity in addictive behaviors: theoretical and treatment implications. Int J Addict. 1990;25:957–993. doi: 10.3109/10826089109071030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schultz W. Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. See RE, Kruzich PJ, Grimm JW. Dopamine, but not glutamate, receptor blockade in the basolateral amygdala attenuates conditioned reward in a rat model of relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001;154:301–310. doi: 10.1007/s002130000636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shaham Y, Hope BT. The role of neuroadaptations in relapse to drug seeking. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1437–1439. doi: 10.1038/nn1105-1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J. The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2003;168:3–20. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1224-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sombers LA, Beyene M, Carelli RM, Wightman RM. Synaptic overflow of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens arises from neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1735–1742. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5562-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stuber GD, Hopf FW, Tye KM, Chen BT, Bonci A. Neuroplastic alterations in the limbic system following cocaine or alcohol exposure. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;3:3–27. doi: 10.1007/7854_2009_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stuber GD, Wightman RM, Carelli RM. Extinction of cocaine self-administration reveals functionally and temporally distinct dopaminergic signals in the nucleus accumbens. Neuron. 2005;46:661–669. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Suaud-Chagny MF, Chergui K, Chouvet G, Gonon F. Relationship between dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens and the discharge activity of dopaminergic neurons during local in vivo application of amino acids in the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience. 1992;49:63–72. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90076-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ungless MA, Whistler JL, Malenka RC, Bonci A. Single cocaine exposure in vivo induces long-term potentiation in dopamine neurons. Nature. 2001;411:583–587. doi: 10.1038/35079077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Telang F, Logan J, Jayne M, Ma Y, Pradhan K, Wong C, Swanson JM. Cognitive control of drug craving inhibits brain reward regions in cocaine abusers. Neuroimage. 2010a;49:2536–2543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, Childress AR, Jayne M, Ma Y, Wong C. Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci. 2006;26:6583–6588. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1544-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Tomasi D, Telang F, Fowler JS, Pradhan K, Jayne M, Logan J, Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Wong C. Methylphenidate attenuates limbic brain inhibition after cocaine-cues exposure in cocaine abusers. PLoS One. 2010b;5:e11509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang GJ, Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Cervany P, Hitzemann RJ, Pappas NR, Wong CT, Felder C. Regional brain metabolic activation during craving elicited by recall of previous drug experiences. Life Sci. 1999;64:775–784. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(98)00619-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Weiss F, Maldonado-Vlaar CS, Parsons LH, Kerr TM, Smith DL, Ben-Shahar O. Control of cocaine-seeking behavior by drug-associated stimuli in rats: effects on recovery of extinguished operant-responding and extracellular dopamine levels in amygdala and nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4321–4326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wickham R, Solecki W, Rathbun LR, McIntosh JM, Addy NA. Ventral tegmental area α6β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors modulate phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core. Psychopharmacology. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3082-0. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yeomans J, Baptista M. Both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in ventral tegmental area contribute to brain-stimulation reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;57:915–921. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00467-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yun IA, Wakabayashi KT, Fields HL, Nicola SM. The ventral tegmental area is required for the behavioral and nucleus accumbens neuronal firing responses to incentive cues. J Neurosci. 2004;24:2923–2933. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5282-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zachariou V, Caldarone BJ, Weathers-Lowin A, George TP, Elsworth JD, Roth RH, Changeux JP, Picciotto MR. Nicotine receptor inactivation decreases sensitivity to cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24:576–589. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zanetti L, de Kerchove D’Exaerde A, Zanardi A, Changeux JP, Picciotto MR, Zoli M. Inhibition of both alpha7* and beta2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors is necessary to prevent development of sensitization to cocaine-elicited increases in extracellular dopamine levels in the ventral striatum. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;187:181–188. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0419-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zanetti L, Picciotto MR, Zoli M. Differential effects of nicotinic antagonists perfused into the nucleus accumbens or the ventral tegmental area on cocaine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;190:189–199. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0598-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhou W, Liu H, Zhang F, Tang S, Zhu H, Lai M, Kalivas PW. Role of acetylcholine transmission in nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area in heroin-seeking induced by conditioned cues. Neuroscience. 2007;144:1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zweifel LS, Fadok JP, Argilli E, Garelick MG, Jones GL, Dickerson TM, Allen JM, Mizumori SJ, Bonci A, Palmiter RD. Activation of dopamine neurons is critical for aversive conditioning and prevention of generalized anxiety. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:620–626. doi: 10.1038/nn.2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zweifel LS, Parker JG, Lobb CJ, Rainwater A, Wall VZ, Fadok JP, Darvas M, Kim MJ, Mizumori SJ, Paladini CA, Phillips PE, Palmiter RD. Disruption of NMDAR-dependent burst firing by dopamine neurons provides selective assessment of phasic dopamine-dependent behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7281–7288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813415106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02
03

Fig. S1. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration across drug treatments. Acquisition of stable self-administration behavior was defined as less than 15% variability in total active lever pressing over 3 consecutive days. Prior to VTA drug administration on withdrawal day 3, there were no pre-existing differences in the acquisition of cocaine self-administration behavior between rats in the “to be Sal” and (A) “to be lid” groups; treatment: F(1, 80)=0.003, p=0.9; time: F(8, 80)=8.2, p<0.001; treatment × time: F(8, 80)=1.4, p=0.2), (B) “to be Musc + Bacl” treatment: F(1, 91)=0.03, p=0.8; time: F(7, 91)=5.2, p<0.001; treatment × time: F(7, 91)=1.2, p=0.3), (C) “to be SCH” dose: F(2, 119)=1.6, p=0.2; time: F(7, 119)=18.7, p<0.001; dose × time: F(7, 119)=0.6, p=0.8), (D) “to be Mec” dose: F(2, 168)=0.1, p=0.9; time: F(7, 168)=11.7, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 168)=0.9, p=0.5), (E) “to be Scop” dose: F(2, 182)=1.04, p=0.4; time: F(7, 182)=17.8, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 186)=1.1, p=0.4) or (F) “to be AP-5” dose: F(2, 161)=0.2, p=0.8; time: F(7, 161)=15.9, p<0.001; dose × time: F(14, 161)=0.4, p=0.9) subjects.

04

Fig. S2. The VTA to NAc core circuit regulates cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine withdrawn rats. (A, B) Intra-VTA micro-infusion of lidocaine (Lid; 0.82 μg/side) but not saline (Sal) attenuated active (A) and inactive (B) lever responding throughout the first 20 min of cueinduced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; treatment × time, p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.05). (C, D) Intra-LDTg micro-infusion of a muscimol and baclofen cocktail (0.003 μg/side Musc + 0.06 μg/side Bacl) but not saline (Sal) attenuated active (C) and inactive (D) lever responding throughout 10 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; treatment × time, p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.05). (E, F) Intra-NAc core micro-infusion of SCH23390 attenuated active (E) but not inactive (F) lever responding during the initial 15 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing for 1 μg/side SCH and initial 10 min for 2 μg/side SCH (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × lever × time, p<0.01 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.01). Data presented as the mean + SEM. There were no significant differences between treatment groups after the initial 60 min, therefore time course data, showed on panel B and F, is reported for only first hour. *** p<0.001; * p<0.05, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

05

Fig. S3. VTA AChRs, but not NMDARs, are potent modulators of cue-induced cocaine-seeking. (A, B) Intra-VTA microinfusion of the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (Mec; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) attenuated active (A) and inactive (B) lever responding during the initial 5 min (3 μg/side Mec; two-way ANOVA with repeated measures dose × time: p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test p<0.05) or 10 min (30 μg/side Mec, p<0.001) of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing. (C, D) Intra-VTA microinfusion of mAChR antagonist scopolamine (Scop; 0, 3, 30 μg/side) attenuated active (C) and inactive (D) lever responding during the initial 5 min (3 μg/side Scop; two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × time: p<0.001 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test p<0.05) or 10 min (67 μg/side Scop; p<0.001) of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing. (E, F) Intra-VTA microinfusion of 1 μg/side of NMDAR antagonist AP- 5 but 0.1 μg/side or saline (Sal) attenuated active (E) but not inactive (F) lever responding during initial 5 min of cue-induced cocaine-seeking testing (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; dose × lever × time: p<0.05 followed by Newman Keuls post hoc test, p<0.001). Data presented as the mean + SEM. There were no differences between experimental groups during second hour of testing, therefore data is shown for first 1h of the cue-induced cocaine-seeking test. ***p<0.001, * p<0.05, Newman Keuls post hoc test.

06

Fig. S4. Phasic VTA stimulation facilitated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in cocaine-trained but not saline-trained abstinent rats. Cocaine-trained rats demonstrated acquisition and maintenance of cocaine self-administration behavior during (A) autoshaping, (B) self-administration and (C) retraining after cannulation surgery. Saline-trained rats showed little responding on either the active or inactive lever during autoshaping (D), self-administration (E) or retraining (F) after cannulation surgery. (G) Cocaine-trained rats, compared to saline-trained rats, showed increased cocaine-seeking during 1 h of testing with VTA stimulation (two-way ANOVA; drug: F(1, 20)=6.6, p<0.05; lever: F(1, 20)=3.7, p=0.06; drug × lever interaction: F(1, 20)=4.9, p<0.05; post hoc test; p<0.05). Phasic stimulation of the VTA (125-150 μA, 60Hz, 24 pulses electrical stimulation), which leads to phasic DA release in the nucleus accumbens, facilitated cue-induced cocaine-seeking in first 20 s epoch after stimulation in cocaine-trained (as shown in Fig 2B) but not (H) saline-trained, abstinent rats. (I) Phasic VTA stimulation during 1 h cue-induced cocaineseeking led to increased active, but not inactive, lever presses during the 20s time period immediately after VTA stimulation in rats previously trained in cocaine self-administration. In contrast, phasic VTA stimulation had no significant effect in saline-trained rats (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; stim × drug × lever interaction: F(1, 20)=4.4, p<0.05, post hoc test p<0.05). Data presented as the mean + SEM. ** for p<0.01, * for p<0.05.

RESOURCES