Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Oct 31;135(45):10.1021/ja407867a. doi: 10.1021/ja407867a

Fluorogenic, Two-Photon Triggered Photoclick Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

Zhipeng Yu , Tymish Y Ohulchanskyy , Peng An , Paras N Prasad , Qing Lin †,*
PMCID: PMC3866799  NIHMSID: NIHMS536979  PMID: 24168622

Abstract

The tetrazole-based photoclick chemistry has provided a powerful tool to image proteins in live cells. To extend photoclick chemistry to living organisms with improved spatiotemporal control, here we report the design of naphthalene-based tetrazoles that can be efficiently activated by two-photon excitation with a 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser. A water-soluble, cell-permeable naphthalene-based tetrazole was identified that reacts with acrylamide with the effective two-photon cross section for the cycloaddition reaction determined to be 3.8 GM. Furthermore, the use of this naphthalene-tetrazole for real-time, spatially controlled imaging of microtubules in live mammalian cells via the fluorogenic, two-photon triggered photoclick chemistry was demonstrated.


Compared with single-photon processes, two-photon excitation (2PE) induced processes offer a superior spatiotemporal control due to the reduced scattering of near infrared (NIR) light in turbid biological tissues and significantly improved three dimensional localization of excitation.1 In addition, the use of NIR light provides deeper tissue penetration, utilizing the biological window of maximum optical transparency (~700–1000 nm). The prominent 2PE induced reactions suitable for biological applications included the reversible photochromic reactions for targeted imaging of cancer cells2 and the photo “uncaging” of caged ligands for regulating physiological function in tissues.3 For example, the use of 6-bromo-7-hydroxycoumarin-4-ylmethyl (Bhc)-caged glutamate allowed the three-dimensional mapping of the glutamate sensitivity of neurons in intact brain slices.4 Invariably, the two-photon-sensitive “caging” groups are sacrificed after their release. Here, we report a new 2PE induced chemistry in which a transient, highly reactive 1,3-dipole is generated from the appropriately functionalized tetrazole upon photoirradiation with a femtosecond pulsed laser, and subsequently intercepted by a suitable dipolarophiles via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction to generate a fluorescent cycloadduct (Figure 1a). We demonstrate that this tetrazole-mediated two-photon triggered reaction can be employed to image microtubules in real time in a spatiotemporally controlled manner in live mammalian cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Design of naphthalene-tetrazoles for fluorogenic, two-photon-triggered photoclick chemistry. (a) General features of the naphthalene-tetrazoles and scheme of fluorogenic, two-photon-triggered photoclick chemistry. (b) Chemical structures of the naphthalene-tetrazoles 1–6 used in this study.

Our previous work on the photoinduced tetrazole-alkene addition reaction (“photoclick” chemistry) have identified tetrazoles that can be activated by single-photon UV light.5 To extend this chemistry to two-photon near-IR activation, we took advantage of the strong two-photon absorption properties of the naphthalene structure6 and synthesized a series of naphthalene-based tetrazoles 1–6 (Figure 1b; Schemes S1–S6 in Supporting Information). Functionalization of naphthalene β-position with the various auxo-chromic and oligo(ethyleneglycol) groups was expected to fine-tune two-photon absorption properties7 and increase water-solubility and potential cell-permeability, respectively. The UV-Vis spectra of tetrazoles 1–6 were recorded (Figure S1) and their absorption characteristics are collected in Table 1. Among them, tetrazole 4 with the longest conjugation system (two naphthalene rings and two carbamates) showed the most bathochromic shift of the absorption peak (λmax = 324 nm) and highest extinction coefficient at 365 nm (Table 1).

Table 1.

Photophysical properties of tetrazoles and their kinetic constants in the single-photon induced cycloaddition reaction.a

Tetrazole λmaxb (nm) εmaxc (M−1 cm−1) ε365d (M−1 cm−1) k0e (μM s−1) ΦT f
1 322 31,000 1,700 0.27 0.33
2 316 24,000 690 0.25 0.75
3 322 40,000 1,900 0.048 0.053
4 324 41,000 4,500 0.064 0.029
5 314 32,000 1,300 0.29 0.47
6 318 32,000 2,000 0.33 0.33
a

Compounds were dissolved in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1) to obtain a concentration of 25 μM. For the cycloaddition reaction, 2.5 mM acrylamide (100 equiv) was used to drive the full conversion of nitrile imine to pyrazoline.

b

λmax in the 300 ~ 500 nm region.

c

Extinction coefficient at λmax.

d

Extinction coefficient at 365 nm.

e

Zero-order rate constant under 365 nm photoirradiation.

f

Quantum yield of tetrazole ring rupture under 365 nm photoirradiation.

The photochemical step of this reaction involves light-triggered rupture of the tetrazole ring to generate in situ a highly reactive nitrile imine dipole.8 To determine the ring-rupture kinetics, we subjected a mixture of tetrazole and 100 equiv of acrylamide dipolarophile to photoirradiation with a handheld 365 nm UV lamp. Plotting the pyrazoline cycloadduct formation in the first 80 s of photoirradiation (when the rate-limiting step is the rupture of the tetrazole ring) gave the zero-order rate constant, k0, for the various tetrazoles (Figure 2, Table 1). Interestingly, tetrazole 5 showed the second fastest kinetics (k0= 0.29 μM s−1) despite its relatively low extinction coefficient, while tetrazole 4, with the strongest absorption at 365 nm, showed significantly slower kinetics (k0 = 0.064 μM s−1). This apparent discrepancy can be explained by their large difference in the quantum yield (ΦT = 0.47 for 5 vs. 0.029 for 4; Table 1) determined by ferrioxalate-polyoxometalate-based chemical actinometer (Figure S2).9 In a subtle way, tetrazole 6 with the carbamate group on the N-naphthalene ring and the naphthylmethyl ester on the C-aryl side showed the highest ring rupture quantum yield under 365 nm photoirradiation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Determining tetrazole two-photon absorption cross section and two-photon cycloaddition cross-section. (a) UV-Vis (dash line) and fluorescence spectra (solid line) monitoring of the cycloaddition reaction between 25 μM tetrazole 6 and 2.5 mM acrylamide in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1) under 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser irradiation. For fluorescence measurement, λex = 405 nm. (b) Plot of the pyrazoline cycloadduct formation over 120 min of 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser irradiation. Tetrazole 3 was not included because of its insufficient solubility in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1). (c) Plot of the time course of photo-decaging of BHC-OAc upon 740 nm femtosecond pulsed laser irradiation. (d) Kinetic and photophysical data for naphthalene-tetrazoles in the two-photon triggered photoclick chemistry. The two-photon cross section of the cycloaddition reaction, δcT, and two-photon absorption cross section, δaT, were measured in GM (10−50 cm4s/photon).

To identify a suitable NIR wavelength for two-photon activation of tetrazoles, we irradiated a solution of tetrazole 1 and 100 equiv acrylamide in acetonitrile/PBS (1:1) with a tunable fs-pulsed laser with the wavelength set at 750, 730, or 700 nm, and found that 700 nm was most conducive to the cycloadduct formation (Figure S3). We then performed the kinetic analysis of the two-photon triggered cycloaddition reaction for all tetrazoles by following the fluorescence spectra of the newly generated fluorescent pyrazoline cycloadducts (Figures S4–S8). As an illustration, Figure 2a shows the absorption change and the fluorescence “turn-on” over time10 when a solution of tetrazole 6 and acrylamide was irradiated with a 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser. A plot of the time course of the cycloadduct formation revealed that the two-photon triggered cycloaddition reaction follows the zero-order kinetics (k0 = 0.067 ± 0.001 μM/min), indicating that the photoinduced tetrazole ring rupture is the rate-determining step (Figure 2b). By comparing the cycloaddition rate to that of uncaging of BHC acetate (BHC-OAc) (k0 = 0.0372 ± 0.0044 μM/min, Figure 2c), the effective two-photon cycloaddition cross section for tetrazole 6 was calculated to be 3.8 GM.11 Assuming quantum yield of the tetrazole ring-rupture under two-photon activation is the same as under single-photon activation, the two-photon absorption cross section was then calculated based on the following equation: δaT = δcT/ΦT, and the data are collected in Figure 2d. Among the naphthalene-tetrazoles, tetrazole 4 with the longest π conjugation showed the highest absorption cross section (δaT = 45 GM). However, its effective two photon cycloaddition cross section is the lowest (δcT = 1.3 GM), a result of its extremely low quantum yield (Figure 2d). This large discrepancy between the cycloaddition cross section and the absorption cross section reinforces the notion that high quantum yield of the tetrazole ring rupture—an intrinsic property of the excited tetrazole species—is vital to the overall efficiency of the two-photon triggered photo-click chemistry.

Since acrylamide has recently been introduced into proteins site-specifically in the form of Nε-acryloyl-l-lysine (AcrK),12 we examined whether the naphthalene-based tetrazoles can label the AcrK-encoded proteins selectively under the two-photon condition. Two sfGFP mutants, sfGFP-S2BocK and sfGFP-S2AcrK, carrying tert-butyloxycarbonyl-lysine (BocK) and AcrK at Ser-2 position, respectively, were expressed and purified to homogeneity (Figures S10–11). We irradiated the solutions of 10 μM of sfGFP-S2AcrK or sfGFP-S2BocK and 200 μM of tetrazole 6 with the 700 nm fs laser at room temperature for 4 h (Figure 3a). In-gel fluorescence analysis of the reaction mixtures after SDS-PAGE showed that the two-photon triggered photoclick chemistry proceeded nicely with sfGFP-S2AcrK but not with sfGFP-S2BocK (Figure 3b). ESI-MS revealed an intact mass of 28425.0 ± 3.2 Da for the pyrazoline adduct (Figure 3c), matching the theoretic mass of 28425.3 Da, with conversion estimated to be 16.5% (Figure S12).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Selective femtosecond pulsed laser induced fluorogenic labeling of sfGFP-S2AcrK by tetrazole 6 in vitro. (a) Reaction scheme. A solution of 10 μM sfGFP-S2AcrK and 200 μM tetrazole 6 in PBS buffer in a quartz cuvette was irradiated with a 700 nm femtosecond laser for 4 h. (b) Coomassie blue stain (top panel) and in-gel fluorescence (bottom panel) of the same protein gel after the reaction mixtures were resolved by SDS-PAGE. (c) De-convoluted mass spectra of sfGFP-S2AcrK (in red) and the product (in blue) showing the formation of the pyrazoline adduct.

To probe whether the pyrazoline cycloadducts derived from the naphthalene-tetrazoles can be directly monitored in situ using fluorescence microscopy, we tested the ability of tetrazole 613 to fluorescently label microtubules in cultured CHO cells that are pretreated with a fumarate-modified docetaxel under 365 nm photoirradiation condition.14 To this end, we synthesized a fumarate-docetaxel conjugate, IPFAD, by appending mono-isopropyl fumarate amide (IPFA) at position 10 of docetaxel via a flexible linker (Scheme S7) based on the following considerations: (i) mono-isopropyl fumarate amide (IPFA) is chemically stable toward glutathione—biological nucleophile present in high concentrations inside living cells (Figure S14); (ii) modification at position 10 of docetaxel does not affect the binding of docetaxel to microtubules;15 and (iii) IPFA gave a fast cycloaddition reaction with tetrazole 6 with the second-order rate constant, k2, of 89 ± 8.5 M−1 s−1 (Figure S15). Indeed, the IPFAD-treated cells showed significantly higher cytosolic fluorescence compared to the untreated cells (Figure S16). Spectral scan of the fluorescent cells revealed a hypsochromic shift in emission maximum (λem = 498 nm) accompanied by an increase in intensity (Figure S16), suggesting that the pyrazoline-docetaxel cycloadduct likely binds to a hydrophobic pocket on the microtubules where the dielectric constant is low (Figures S17–18).16

To demonstrate that the naphthalene-tetrazole can mediate two-photon triggered photoclick chemistry in vivo, we treated CHO cells with 3 μM of tetrazole 6 and 40 μM of IPFAD17 followed by photoirradiation with a 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser (<140 fs pulse width, 90 MHz). Specifically, a rectangle area in the culture dish was selected for continuous photoirradiation by the 700 nm femtosecond laser and the time-lapsed fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (ex, 405 nm; em, 462 ~ 580 nm). Only the IPFAD-treated CHO cells showed fast, time-dependent rise in cytosolic fluorescence in the irradiated area18 (Figure 4a; compare top row to bottom row). Quantification of the cytosolic fluorescence indicates that the intensity reached a plateau at about 43 sec,19 while there was a gradual increase in background fluorescence for cells without the IPFAD treatment (Figure 4b), likely due to the photogenerated weakly fluorescent nitrile imine intermediate.20 Interestingly, increasing tetrazole 6 concentrations led to small increases in fluorescence intensity along with increased background, with the signal-to-background ratio staying about the same (Figure 4c, Figure S21), suggesting that the two-photon triggered tetrazole ring rupture—the rate-determining step of the reaction—is essentially independent of the initial tetrazole concentration. This result is consistent with the in vitro activation studies (Figure 2b). The specificity of microtubule labeling was confirmed by two-color overlay21 in which the microtubules were immunostained using an anti-α-tubulin antibody (Figure S22). It is noteworthy that the in situ formed pyrazoline-docetaxel gave higher efficiency in labeling microtubules than treating cells with the preformed pyrazoline-docetaxel at the identical concentration (Figure S23), presumably due to poorer permeability of the pyrazoline-docetaxel, indicating a unique advantage for our two-step in situ labeling procedure.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fluorescence microscopy of the fluorogenic, two-photon triggered photoclick chemistry in CHO cells. (a) Fluorescence/DIC overlap image before photoirradiation (panel 1), time-lapsed fluorescence images (panels 2–9) and fluorescence/DIC overlap image after photoirradiation (panel 10). CHO cells were treated with 3 μM tetrazole 6 in the presence (top row) or absence (bottom row) of 40 μM IPFAD followed by photoillumination of the red rectangle area with a 700 nm femtosecond pulsed laser. Scale bar = 61.3 μm. (b) Time courses of fluorescence development in ten cytosolic regions in selected CHO cells; red curve denotes the regions in the IPFAD-treated cells while blue curves denote the regions in the untreated cells. The concentrations of tetrazole 6 and IPFAD were 3 μM and 40 μM, respectively. (c) Effect of tetrazole 6 concentration on fluorescence intensity monitored by confocal microscopy. See Figure S21 for details.

In summary, we have developed a new type of two-photon triggered chemistry in which the two-photon generated, highly reactive intermediates undergo spontaneous and specific 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions with the suitable dipolarophiles to generate in situ the fluorescent cycloadducts. This naphthalene-tetrazole mediated two-photon reactions showed higher two photon reaction cross sections than the two-photon uncaging action cross sections for commonly used two-photon caging groups.22 Moreover, the utilities of this two-photon triggered, fluorogenic photoclick chemistry in labeling an alkene-encoded protein site-selectively in vitro and ligand-bound microtubules in cultured cells were demonstrated. Since the genetic methods to encode the unnatural amino acids containing more reactive alkene dipolarophiles have been reported for both cultured mammalian cells23 and D. melanogaster fruit fly,24 we expect this naphthalene-tetrazole-based two-photon chemistry to offer a new tool to dissect protein function in living organisms with a high spatiotemporal precision.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the National Institutes of Health (GM 085092) for financial support. We thank Dr. Guang S. He at ILPB for helpful discussions, Alan Siegel at SUNY Buffalo Biological Sciences Imaging Facility (supported by the National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation grant DBI-0923133) for assistance with microscopy, and Dr. Wenshe Liu at Texas A&M University for generously providing us the plasmids pEvol-PylT-PylKRS, pEvol-AcrKRS and pET-sfGFPS2TAG.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Supplemental figures and table, synthetic schemes, experimental procedures, and characterization of all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Helmchen F, Denk W. Nat Methods. 2005;2:932–940. doi: 10.1038/nmeth818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhu MQ, Zhang GF, Li C, Aldred MP, Chang E, Drezek RA, Li AD. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:365–372. doi: 10.1021/ja106895k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bort G, Gallavardin T, Ogden D, Dalko PI. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:4526–4537. doi: 10.1002/anie.201204203. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Furuta T, Wang SSH, Dantzker JL, Dore TM, Bybee WJ, Callaway EM, Denk W, Tsien RY. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1193–1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Lim RK, Lin Q. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:828–839. doi: 10.1021/ar200021p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wang Y, Hu WJ, Song W, Lim RKV, Lin Q. Org Lett. 2008;10:3725–3728. doi: 10.1021/ol801350r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yu Z, Ho LY, Wang Z, Lin Q. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:5033–5036. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.04.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McClure DS. J Chem Phys. 1954;22:1668–1675. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Jacobson K, Mouritsen OG, Anderson RGW. Nature Cell Biol. 2007;9:7–13. doi: 10.1038/ncb0107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim HM, Kim BR, Choo HJ, Ko YG, Jeon SJ, Kim CH, Joo T, Cho BR. Chem Bio Chem. 2008;9:2830–2838. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kim HM, Cho BR. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:863–872. doi: 10.1021/ar800185u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Zheng SL, Wang Y, Yu Z, Lin Q, Coppens P. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:18036–18037. doi: 10.1021/ja9094523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bégué D, Qiao GG, Wentrup C. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:5339–5350. doi: 10.1021/ja2118442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee J, Kim J, Choi W. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:5433–5438. doi: 10.1021/es070474z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.See Table S1 in the SI for photophysical characterization including fluorescence turn-on ratios for all the pyrazolines.
  • 11.The following equation: δcT = δurCrNP/CTNr, was used, where Cr and CT are the initial concentrations of the reference compound (BHC-OAc) and tetrazole, respectively, NP is the number of pyrazoline molecules formed per unit time, and Nr is the number of uncaged molecules per unit time. The literature value of the uncaging action cross section of BHC-OAc, δur = 0.95 GM, was used in the calculation. See Figure S9 in the SI for details.
  • 12.(a) Lee YJ, Wu B, Raymond JE, Zeng Y, Fang X, Wooley KL, Liu WR. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:1664–1670. doi: 10.1021/cb400267m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Li F, Zhang H, Sun Y, Pan Y, Zhou J, Wang J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:9700–9704. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.While tetrazoles 5 and 6 show similar two photon cycloaddition cross sections (4.0 GM for 5 and 3.8 GM for 6), we selected tetrazole 6 in our in vivo studies because the pyrazoline cycloadduct derived from tetrazole 6 was found to be far more resistant to photo-bleaching in the fluorescence microscopic studies compared to the pyrazoline cycloadduct derived from tetrazole 5.
  • 14.Yu Z, Ho LY, Lin Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:11912–11915. doi: 10.1021/ja204758c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Miller ML, Roller EE, Zhao RY, Leece BA, Ab O, Baloglu E, Goldmacher VS, Chari RVJ. J Med Chem. 2004;47:4802–4805. doi: 10.1021/jm049705s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Matesanz R, Rodríguez-Salarichs J, Pera B, Canales A, Andreu JM, Jiménez-Barbero J, Bras W, Nogales A, Fang WS, Díaz JF. Biophys J. 2011;101:2970–2980. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhuang YD, Chiang PY, Wang CW, Tan KT. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:8124–8128. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tetrazole 6 and IPFAD showed no cytotoxicity toward CHO cells at concentrations ≤ 100 μM; see Figure S19 for details.
  • 18.The cytosolic fluorescence outside the rectangle boundary is due to rapid diffusion of the in situ generated nitrile imine intermediate within the cytosolic space of the individual irradiated cells.
  • 19.The decrease in fluorescence intensity after 43 sec is due to photo-bleaching of the pyrazoline fluorophore at 405 nm excitation; see Figure S20 for details.
  • 20.Song W, Wang Y, Yu Z, Vera CI, Qu J, Lin Q. ACS Chem Biol. 2010;5:875–885. doi: 10.1021/cb100193h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined to be 0.66. The reaction inside the cells was triggered by a handheld 365 nm UV lamp because the subsequent fixation and immunostaining steps make it difficult to re-track the femtosecond 700 nm laser beam scanned area.
  • 22.Davis MJ, Kragor CH, Reddie KG, Wilson HC, Zhu Y, Dore TM. J Org Chem. 2009;74:1721–1729. doi: 10.1021/jo802658a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yu Z, Pan Y, Wang Z, Wang J, Lin Q. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:10600–10604. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bianco A, Townsley FM, Greiss S, Lang K, Chin JW. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:748–750. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES