Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8334–8339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8334

Methylation of coding region alone inhibits gene expression in plant protoplasts.

T Hohn 1, S Corsten 1, S Rieke 1, M Müller 1, H Rothnie 1
PMCID: PMC38671  PMID: 8710871

Abstract

Derivatives of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter lacking CG and CNG methylation targets were constructed and used to direct transcription of reporter gene constructs in transiently transformed protoplasts. Such methylation-target-free (MTF) promoters, although weaker than the 35S promoter, retain significant activity despite mutation of the as-1 element. The effect of methylation on gene expression in MTF- and 35S-promoter driven constructs was examined. Even when the promoter region was free of methylation targets, reporter gene expression was markedly reduced when cytosine residues in CG dinucleotides were methylated in vitro prior to transformation. Mosaic methylation experiments, in which only specific parts of the plasmids were methylated, revealed that methylation of the coding region alone has a negative effect on reporter gene expression. Methylation nearer the 5' end of the coding region was more inhibitory, consistent with inhibition of transcription elongation.

Full text

PDF
8334

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams R. L. Eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases--structure and function. Bioessays. 1995 Feb;17(2):139–145. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry C., Faugeron G., Rossignol J. L. Methylation induced premeiotically in Ascobolus: coextension with DNA repeat lengths and effect on transcript elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4557–4561. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarik D. P., Duckett C., Kim S. U., Perez V. L., Griffis K., Guenthner P. C., Folks T. M. DNA CpG methylation inhibits binding of NF-kappa B proteins to the HIV-1 long terminal repeat cognate DNA motifs. New Biol. 1991 Oct;3(10):969–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benfey P. N., Chua N. H. The Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S Promoter: Combinatorial Regulation of Transcription in Plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):959–966. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bentley D. L. Regulation of transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):210–216. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doerfler W. Abortive infection and malignant transformation by adenoviruses: integration of viral DNA and control of viral gene expression by specific patterns of DNA methylation. Adv Virus Res. 1991;39:89–128. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60793-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis J. G., Tokuhisa J. G., Llewellyn D. J., Bouchez D., Singh K., Dennis E. S., Peacock W. J. Does the ocs-element occur as a functional component of the promoters of plant genes? Plant J. 1993 Sep;4(3):433–443. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04030433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fang R. X., Nagy F., Sivasubramaniam S., Chua N. H. Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):141–150. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fütterer J., Gordon K., Pfeiffer P., Sanfaçon H., Pisan B., Bonneville J. M., Hohn T. Differential inhibition of downstream gene expression by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S RNA leader. Virus Genes. 1989 Sep;3(1):45–55. doi: 10.1007/BF00301986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fütterer J., Gordon K., Sanfaçon H., Bonneville J. M., Hohn T. Positive and negative control of translation by the leader sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus pregenomic 35S RNA. EMBO J. 1990 Jun;9(6):1697–1707. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08293.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fütterer J., Hohn T. Translation of a polycistronic mRNA in the presence of the cauliflower mosaic virus transactivator protein. EMBO J. 1991 Dec;10(12):3887–3896. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04958.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gallie D. R., Sleat D. E., Watts J. W., Turner P. C., Wilson T. M. The 5'-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA enhances the expression of foreign gene transcripts in vitro and in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Apr 24;15(8):3257–3273. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.8.3257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graessmann A., Sandberg G., Guhl E., Graessmann M. Methylation of single sites within the herpes simplex virus tk coding region and the simian virus 40 T-antigen intron causes gene inactivation. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Mar;14(3):2004–2010. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hershkovitz M., Gruenbaum Y., Renbaum P., Razin A., Loyter A. Effect of CpG methylation on gene expression in transfected plant protoplasts. Gene. 1990 Oct 15;94(2):189–193. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90386-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hobbs S. L., Kpodar P., DeLong C. M. The effect of T-DNA copy number, position and methylation on reporter gene expression in tobacco transformants. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 Dec;15(6):851–864. doi: 10.1007/BF00039425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hsieh C. L. Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;14(8):5487–5494. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.8.5487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Inamdar N. M., Ehrlich K. C., Ehrlich M. CpG methylation inhibits binding of several sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins from pea, wheat, soybean and cauliflower. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jul;17(1):111–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00036811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ingelbrecht I., Van Houdt H., Van Montagu M., Depicker A. Posttranscriptional silencing of reporter transgenes in tobacco correlates with DNA methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 25;91(22):10502–10506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jefferson R. A., Kavanagh T. A., Bevan M. W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):3901–3907. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02730.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jorgensen R. A. Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression States. Science. 1995 May 5;268(5211):686–691. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5211.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jost J. P., Saluz H. P., Pawlak A. Estradiol down regulates the binding activity of an avian vitellogenin gene repressor (MDBP-2) and triggers a gradual demethylation of the mCpG pair of its DNA binding site. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Oct 25;19(20):5771–5775. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.20.5771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kass S. U., Goddard J. P., Adams R. L. Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Dec;13(12):7372–7379. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.12.7372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katagiri F., Lam E., Chua N. H. Two tobacco DNA-binding proteins with homology to the nuclear factor CREB. Nature. 1989 Aug 31;340(6236):727–730. doi: 10.1038/340727a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Katagiri F., Yamazaki K., Horikoshi M., Roeder R. G., Chua N. H. A plant DNA-binding protein increases the number of active preinitiation complexes in a human in vitro transcription system. Genes Dev. 1990 Nov;4(11):1899–1909. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.11.1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kay R., Chan A., Daly M., McPherson J. Duplication of CaMV 35S Promoter Sequences Creates a Strong Enhancer for Plant Genes. Science. 1987 Jun 5;236(4806):1299–1302. doi: 10.1126/science.236.4806.1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Keshet I., Yisraeli J., Cedar H. Effect of regional DNA methylation on gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(9):2560–2564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.9.2560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kozak M. Point mutations define a sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):283–292. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lam E., Benfey P. N., Gilmartin P. M., Fang R. X., Chua N. H. Site-specific mutations alter in vitro factor binding and change promoter expression pattern in transgenic plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(20):7890–7894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Levine A., Cantoni G. L., Razin A. Methylation in the preinitiation domain suppresses gene transcription by an indirect mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 1;89(21):10119–10123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Linn F., Heidmann I., Saedler H., Meyer P. Epigenetic changes in the expression of the maize A1 gene in Petunia hybrida: role of numbers of integrated gene copies and state of methylation. Mol Gen Genet. 1990 Jul;222(2-3):329–336. doi: 10.1007/BF00633837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Maldonado E., Reinberg D. News on initiation and elongation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;7(3):352–361. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(95)80090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Martienssen R. A., Richards E. J. DNA methylation in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Apr;5(2):234–242. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(95)80014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matzke A. J., Neuhuber F., Park Y. D., Ambros P. F., Matzke M. A. Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 Aug 2;244(3):219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00285449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Matzke M. A., Matzke A. J. Differential inactivation and methylation of a transgene in plants by two suppressor loci containing homologous sequences. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 May;16(5):821–830. doi: 10.1007/BF00015074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Matzke M. A., Matzke AJM. How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? Plant Physiol. 1995 Mar;107(3):679–685. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.3.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Meins F., Jr, Kunz C. Gene silencing in transgenic plants: a heuristic autoregulation model. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;197:105–120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79145-1_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Meyer P., Heidmann I. Epigenetic variants of a transgenic petunia line show hypermethylation in transgene DNA: an indication for specific recognition of foreign DNA in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet. 1994 May 25;243(4):390–399. doi: 10.1007/BF00280469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyer P., Linn F., Heidmann I., Meyer H., Niedenhof I., Saedler H. Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of a maize A1 gene construct in transgenic petunia and its colour phenotype. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Feb;231(3):345–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00292701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pradhan S., Adams R. L. Distinct CG and CNG DNA methyltransferases in Pisum sativum. Plant J. 1995 Mar;7(3):471–481. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.7030471.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pröls F., Meyer P. The methylation patterns of chromosomal integration regions influence gene activity of transferred DNA in Petunia hybrida. Plant J. 1992 Jul;2(4):465–475. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1992.t01-20-00999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Puchta H., Kocher S., Hohn B. Extrachromosomal homologous DNA recombination in plant cells is fast and is not affected by CpG methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3372–3379. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Renbaum P., Abrahamove D., Fainsod A., Wilson G. G., Rottem S., Razin A. Cloning, characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of the gene coding for the CpG DNA methylase from Spiroplasma sp. strain MQ1(M.SssI). Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Mar 11;18(5):1145–1152. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.5.1145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Renckens S., De Greve H., Van Montagu M., Hernalsteens J. P. Petunia plants escape from negative selection against a transgene by silencing the foreign DNA via methylation. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 May;233(1-2):53–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00587561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rossignol J. L., Faugeron G. Gene inactivation triggered by recognition between DNA repeats. Experientia. 1994 Mar 15;50(3):307–317. doi: 10.1007/BF01924014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rossignol J. L., Faugeron G. MIP: an epigenetic gene silencing process in Ascobolus immersus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995;197:179–191. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-79145-1_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sanfaçon H., Hohn T. Proximity to the promoter inhibits recognition of cauliflower mosaic virus polyadenylation signal. Nature. 1990 Jul 5;346(6279):81–84. doi: 10.1038/346081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Staiger D., Kaulen H., Schell J. A CACGTG motif of the Antirrhinum majus chalcone synthase promoter is recognized by an evolutionarily conserved nuclear protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(18):6930–6934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.6930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wassenegger M., Heimes S., Riedel L., Sänger H. L. RNA-directed de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):567–576. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Weber H., Ziechmann C., Graessmann A. In vitro DNA methylation inhibits gene expression in transgenic tobacco. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(13):4409–4415. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07891.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yankulov K., Blau J., Purton T., Roberts S., Bentley D. L. Transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II is stimulated by transactivators. Cell. 1994 Jun 3;77(5):749–759. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90058-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES