Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 19;20:56. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2013055

Table 6.

Comparisons of Prosorhynchus longisaccatus, green shading shows minor distinctions.

  Length Width % Rhynchus L % Previtellarium % Pre-Uterine % Pre-mouth % Post-testicular % Cirrus-sac reach % Eggs Reference
P. longisaccatus ex C. urodeta 863 40 27 23 35 55 45 51 30 × 20 new data
P. longisaccatus ex E. areolatus 639-1,203 21–41 18–25 14–25 19–38 40–56 38–55 40–62 26–36 × 17–21 new data
P. longisaccatus ex E. cyanopodus 920–1,403 25–43 18–27 15–24 22–40 44–55 37–53 45–60 24–33 × 14–23 new data
P. longisaccatus ex E. maculatus 784–1,160 23–46 17–27 11–22 20–37 41–58 40–54 44–64 24–40 × 17–25 new data
P. longisaccatus Durio & Manter, 1968 1,096–1,201 29–30 24 21 33 52 43 48 30–33 × 17–32 [9]
P. longisaccatus Durio & Manter, 1968 1,888–2,088 29–40 14–17 14 39 53 25 27 30–32 × 16–23 [42]
P. atlanticus Manter, 1940 705–1,677 18–28 17–24 22–27 41–52 45–47 39–45 36–39 27–34 × 14–22 [24]
P. atlanticus Manter, 1940 996–1,047 27–33 24–26 23–25 36–48 45–48 38–44 36–42 31–36 × 18–20 [5]
P. epinepheli Yamaguti, 1939 1,250–2,350 40–43 14–19 14 22 54 41 41 28–30 × 18–21 [51]
P. lafii Bott & Cribb, 2009 1,040–1,184 15–22 18 26 34 44 49 47 29–30 × 15–16 [2]