Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1986 Nov;83(21):8029–8033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8029

Metalloendoprotease inhibitors that block fusion also prevent biochemical differentiation in L6 myoblasts.

E Baldwin, C Kayalar
PMCID: PMC386860  PMID: 3534879

Abstract

The effect of metalloendoprotease inhibitors on the biochemical differentiation of the rat skeletal muscle line, L6, was investigated. Confluent unfused L6 cells exposed briefly to 1,10-phenanthroline, a chelator of divalent metal cations, or continuously to dipeptide amide metalloendoprotease substrates that are blocked at the NH2-terminals, N-carbobenzyloxyserylleucyl amide and N-carbobenzyloxyglycylleucyl amide, did not fuse or express creatine kinase, myosin heavy chain, or alpha-actin. These effects were reversible and dose-dependent. Exposure to N-carbobenzyloxylglycylglycyl amide, which is not a metalloendoprotease inhibitor, had no effect. As the differentiation in a culture progressed, 1,10-phenanthroline became less effective in blocking the accumulation of creatine kinase and myosin heavy chain. Exposure of partially fused cultures to N-carbobenzyloxyserylleucyl amide prevented any further accumulation of muscle-specific proteins. In confluent cultures where cell division was blocked before the onset of differentiation, N-carbobenzyloxyserylleucyl amide still prevented fusion and the induction of creatine kinase. This indicates that these inhibitors do not act by interfering with the cell cycle. Experiments that measured DNA synthesis rates, plating efficiencies, and the effects of sequential dipeptide and dimethyl sulfoxide treatments indicate that L6 myoblasts do not irreversibly withdraw from the cell cycle when exposed to N-carbobenzyloxyserylleucyl amide. These results are consistent with the role of a metalloendoprotease in initiating the terminal differentiation of cultured muscle cells.

Full text

PDF
8029

Images in this article

8032Image
on p.8032
8032Image
on p.8032

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bandman E., Walker C. R., Strohman R. C. Diazepam inhibits myoblast fusion and expression of muscle specific protein synthesis. Science. 1978 May 5;200(4341):559–561. doi: 10.1126/science.565534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blau H. M., Epstein C. J. Manipulation of myogenesis in vitro: reversible inhibition by DMSO. Cell. 1979 May;17(1):95–108. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90298-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Couch C. B., Strittmatter W. J. Rat myoblast fusion requires metalloendoprotease activity. Cell. 1983 Jan;32(1):257–265. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90516-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Couch C. B., Strittmatter W. J. Specific blockers of myoblast fusion inhibit a soluble and not the membrane-associated metalloendoprotease in myoblasts. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 10;259(9):5396–5399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Croop J., Holtzer H. Response of myogenic and fibrogenic cells to cytochalasin B and to colcemid. I. Light microscope observations. J Cell Biol. 1975 May;65(2):271–285. doi: 10.1083/jcb.65.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lathrop B., Olson E., Glaser L. Control by fibroblast growth factor of differentiation in the BC3H1 muscle cell line. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1540–1547. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morihara K. Comparative specificity of microbial proteinases. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1974;41(0):179–243. doi: 10.1002/9780470122860.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mundy D. I., Strittmatter W. J. Requirement for metalloendoprotease in exocytosis: evidence in mast cells and adrenal chromaffin cells. Cell. 1985 Mar;40(3):645–656. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90213-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Munson R., Jr, Caldwell K. L., Glaser L. Multiple controls for the synthesis of muscle-specific proteins in BC3H1 cells. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):350–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nadal-Ginard B. Commitment, fusion and biochemical differentiation of a myogenic cell line in the absence of DNA synthesis. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):855–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nguyen H. T., Medford R. M., Nadal-Ginard B. Reversibility of muscle differentiation in the absence of commitment: analysis of a myogenic cell line temperature-sensitive for commitment. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):281–293. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Paterson B., Strohman R. C. Myosin synthesis in cultures of differentiating chicken embryo skeletal muscle. Dev Biol. 1972 Oct;29(2):113–138. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pinset C., Whalen R. G. Induction of myogenic differentiation in serum-free medium does not require DNA synthesis. Dev Biol. 1985 Apr;108(2):284–289. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pinset C., Whalen R. G. Manipulation of medium conditions and differentiation in the rat myogenic cell line L6. Dev Biol. 1984 Apr;102(2):269–277. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90192-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosenberg J., Szabo A., Rheuark D., Kayalar C. Correlation between fusion and the developmental regulation of membrane glycoproteins in L6 myoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8409–8413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rubenstein P. A., Spudich J. A. Actin microheterogeneity in chick embryo fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jan;74(1):120–123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.1.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schubert D., Harris A. J., Devine C. E., Heinemann S. Characterization of a unique muscle cell line. J Cell Biol. 1974 May;61(2):398–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.61.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shainberg A., Yagil G., Yaffe D. Alterations of enzymatic activities during muscle differentiation in vitro. Dev Biol. 1971 May;25(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(71)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tarikas H., Schubert D. Regulation of adenylate kinase and creatine kinase activities in myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jun;71(6):2377–2381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.6.2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vertel B. M., Fischman D. A. Myosin accumulation in mononucleated cells of chick muscle cultures. Dev Biol. 1976 Feb;48(2):438–446. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90105-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wahrmann J. P., Drugeon G., Delain E., Delain D. Gene expression during the differentiation of myogenic cells of the L6 line. Biochimie. 1976;58(5):551–562. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(76)80225-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yaffe D. Retention of differentiation potentialities during prolonged cultivation of myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):477–483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES