Abstract
During the past two decades, several interventions have been shown to increase the healthy lifespan of model organisms as evolutionarily distant from each other as yeast, worms, flies and mammals. These anti-aging maneuvers include (but are not limited to) cycles of caloric restriction, physical exercise as well as the administration of multiple, chemically unrelated agents, such as resveratrol, spermidine and various rapamycin-like compounds collectively known as rapalogs. Most, if not all, lifespan-extending agents promote macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy), an evolutionarily old mechanism that contributes to the maintenance of intracellular homeostasis and plays a critical role in the adaptive response of cells to stress. In line with this notion, the activation of autophagy appears to mediate significant anti-ageing effects in several organisms, including mice. Here, we focus on rapalogs to discuss the possibility that part of the beneficial activity of lifespan-extending agents stems from their ability to exert immunostimulatory effects. Accumulating evidence indicates indeed that the immune system can recognize and eliminate not only cells that are prone to undergo malignant transformation, but also senescent cells, thus playing a significant role in the control of organismal aging. In addition, it has recently become clear that rapamycin and other rapalogs, which for a long time have been viewed (and used in the clinic) as pure immunosuppressants, can mediate robust immunostimulatory functions, at least in some circumstances.
Keywords: ATG5, everolimus, mTOR, sirolimus, tacrolimus, temsirolimus
The hypothesis that organismal aging might be slowed down, and hence the appearance of aging-associated disorders delayed, has been the subject of intense investigation throughout the past two decades [1, 2]. In this context, several interventions have been demonstrated to significantly extend the healthy lifespan of model organisms as distant from each other on the evolution scale as yeast, worms, flies and mammals [3-6]. For illustrative purposes, such interventions can be classified into two large groups: (1) lifestyle modifications and (2) pharmacological/genetic maneuvers. The former include cycles of caloric restriction as well as a regular physical activity. These are actually known to extend the healthy lifespan of humans since a long time, although the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have only recently begun to emerge [7-10]. The latter encompass the administration of an increasingly wide panel of chemically unrelated molecules, including (but not limited to) resveratrol (a polyphenol found in grapes and red wine), spermidine (a polyamine that is abundant in grapefruits and soybeans), rapamycin (a macrolide originally isolated from the Easter Island micro-organism Streptomyces hygroscopicus) and multiple rapamycin-like compounds that are collectively known as rapalogs [11-15]. Most, if not all, these interventions share the ability to promote macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy), a mechanism for the lysosomal degradation of super-fluous, damaged or ectopic intracellular constituents [16, 17]. Moreover, the beneficial effects of both lifestyle modifications and pharmacological/genetic maneuvers have been shown to depend on an intact autophagic machinery, at least in some models [18-21]. In line with this notion, the moderate overexpression of one essential mediator of autophagy (i.e., ATG5) at the whole body level has recently been shown to extend the median lifespan of mice by approximately 17% [22]. Conversely, the genetic inhibition of autophagy-relevant proteins such as Beclin 1 (ATG6), ATG7 and ATG12 reportedly mediates a negative effect on the healthy lifespan of model organisms including Caenorhabditis elegans [23]. As a matter of fact, baseline levels of autophagy play a major role in the maintenance of intracellular (and hence organismal) homeostasis, hence mediating a robust oncosuppressive activity [24-26]. In addition, autophagy orchestrates the adaptive response of cells to multiple adverse conditions, including nutritional, physical and chemical cues [27]. It is therefore not surprising that autophagy might increase the organismal fitness and hence delay aging [28].
Nonetheless, the precise mechanisms whereby specific changes in lifestyle as well as selected chemicals or genetic manipulations delay aging (at least in model organisms) have not yet been fully elucidated. Thus, the efficacy of some anti-aging interventions may rely on mechanisms other than the upregulation of the autophagic flux. The immune system stands out as a good candidate for a part in this process, based on at least two lines of evidence: (1) autophagy plays a major role not only in the activation of innate responses against intracellular pathogens at the cell-autonomous level [29, 30], but also in the elicitation of adaptive immune responses based on the interaction between antigen-presenting cells and antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes [31-33]; and (2) the immune system has been shown to recognize and eliminate not only cells that are prone to undergoing malignant transformation, but also senescent cells, thus contributing to the control of organismal aging [34, 35]. Interestingly, however, rapamycin and other rapalogs have long been known (and currently employed in the clinic) for their capacity to mediate robust immunosuppressive effects [36-38]. Indeed, rapamycin (which is also known as sirolimus) has first been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999 for use in combination with ciclosporin and corticosteroids to prevent acute organ rejection in patients receiving kidney transplants [39, 40]. As it stands, however, the immunosuppressive potential of rapamycin and multiple rapalogs in humans has never been properly tested, as the clinical trials performed to date invariably employed as a control condition the gold-standard immunosuppressive regimens available [41]. In addition, accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that, at odds with immuno-suppressants that operate by inhibiting calcineurin, such as tacrolimus, rapamycin and other rapalogs might exert a significant immunostimulatory activity, at least under some circumstances.
This hypothesis first originated from the observation that the recipients of solid organs maintained on rapamycin-based regimens manifested a reduced incidence of various tumors, notably lymphoma, as compared to patients subjected to organ transplantation and treated with conventional immunosuppressants such as corticosteroids, ciclosporin, azathioprine or tacrolimus [42-48]. Transplant recipients are indeed known to exhibit an increased incidence of multiple malignancies, encompassing lymphoma as well as hepatocellular carcinoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and other cutaneous cancers, presumably owing to the state of systemic immunosuppression that is required to avoid rejection [49]. In transplanted patients, rapamycin was associated not only with robust oncosuppressive effects, but also with a bona fide anticancer activity against pre-existent tumors, in particular Kaposi's sarcomas [50-54]. Moreover, local or systemic inflammatory responses have been detected in a fraction of transplanted patients on rapamycin-based maintenance regimens [55, 56]. Often, such responses and the consequent toxicity (be it systemic or selectively affecting the transplant) could be promptly reversed by the reintroduction of calcineurin inhibitors [55, 56].
Recently, cancer-preventive and antineoplastic effects have also been attributed to everolimus (also known as RAD001), a rapalog approved by the US FDA for use in patients affected by various malignancies, including renal cell carcinoma (upon the failure of sunitinib- or sorafenib-based chemotherapeutic regimen) [57], subependymal giant cell astrocytoma [58], progressive neuroendocrine tumors of pancreatic origin [59], and advanced estrogen receptor (ER)+, v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ERBB2)+ breast carcinoma (in combination with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane [60]. Although such a beneficial (and completely unsuspected) activity of rapalogs was initially ascribed to their capacity to robustly inhibit the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) in cancer cells, accumulating preclinical evidence indicates that the therapeutic and oncopreventive effects of rapamycin-like compounds originates, at least in part, from cancer cell-extrinsic mechanisms that involve the immune system [61]. In further support of this notion, transplant recipients treated with rapamycin- or everolimus-based maintenance regimens appear to be significantly less predisposed to cytomegalovirus infections than their counterparts receiving conventional immuno-suppressants [62, 63].
Rapamycin and other rapalogs have been shown to exert robust antineoplastic and oncopreventive effects in both transplantable and oncogene-driven tumor models. In immunocompromised mice xenografted with human tumors, this activity obviously reflects cancer cell-intrinsic (or stromal) mechanisms. As a matter of fact, mTORC1 is hyperactivated (hence delivering critical pro-survival signals) in a large number of malignancies, most often due to genetic or epigenetic alterations that result in constitutive signaling via upstream tyrosine kinase receptors (e.g., the epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) [64-67]. Conversely, the anticancer effects of rapalogs in immunocompetent settings appear to rely, at least in part, on the elicitation of tumor-targeting immune responses. Rapamycin appears to enhance multiple facets of immune and inflammatory responses elicited in mice by stimuli encompassing replication-competent bacteria [68-73] and viruses [74-77], as well as purified components thereof [74, 78-82] and synthetic immunomodulatory agents [83, 84]. Ovalbumin-specific αβ T lymphocytes exposed to microspheres coated with an ovalbumin-derived peptide plus co-stimulatory CD80 molecules (or with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies) in the presence of rapamycin exhibited improved memory and antitumor functions in vivo than T cells of the same type activated in the presence of interleukin (IL)-12 [85-87]. Along similar lines, rapamycin has been shown to enhance tumor-targeting CD8+ T-cell memory responses elicited by a poxviral anticancer vaccine in mice [88, 89]. Such an immunostimulatory activity was observed only when rapamycin was administered in a high-dose short therapeutic course, as opposed to both a single, low-dose course as well as prolonged treatment schedules [88, 89]. Of note, rapamycin has also been shown to increase the yield and effector functions of human γδ T cells activated in vitro with isopentenyl pyrophosphate plus recombinant IL-2 [90]. In particular, γδ T cells subjected to antigen stimulation in the presence of rapamycin expressed increased levels of the activation marker CD69, the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 and IL-2 receptor α (IL2RA, best known as CD25) [90, 91]. These findings suggest that rapamycin may potentiate purely adaptive immune responses, such as those mediated by αβ T lymphocytes, as well as immune responses with mixed adaptive/innate features, such as those orchestrated by γδ T cells [92, 93]. Other rapalogs, including everolimus and temsirolimus (CCI-779, which has originally been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in 2007) [94], have been demonstrated to exert immunostimulatory effects, in vitro and in vivo [77, 95, 96]. As a standalone example, temsirolimus was shown significantly improve the therapeutic potential of a peptide-based anticancer vaccine against established renal cell carcinomas and melanomas in mice [96, 97]. Thus, the potential immunostimulatory activity of rapalogs appears to stem from an on-target effect, i.e., the inhibition of mTORC1 [61, 98, 99].
Taken together, these observations suggest that rapamycin and other rapalogs are capable of stimulating, rather than inhibiting, immune responses, at least under selected circumstances. Whether such an immunostimulatory function truly underlies the anti-aging effects of rapamycin remains to be formally demonstrated. Nonetheless, accumulating preclinical data (Table 1) as well as a large amount of circumstantial clinical evidence (Table 2) suggests that these lifespan-extending chemicals can be harnessed to promote therapeutically relevant antitumor immune responses. Properly designed trials that evaluate the actual immunotherapeutic potential of rapamycin-like compounds are urgently awaited. Alternatively, it will be interesting to see whether circulating or intratumoral biomarkers of pre-existing or therapy-elicited immune responses are capable of identifying a subset of cancer patients that obtain full-blown clinical benefits from the administration of rapalogs. The standardized immuno-monitoring procedures that are required in this context have just begun to be defined and implemented into clinical trials [100, 101]. Altogether, these studies will cast new light on whether rapamycin and other rapalogs should still be considered as immuno-suppressants or whether their immunomodulatory activity, similar that of other drugs like cyclophosphamide [102, 103], rather depends on a large panel of factors, including dose and administration schedule. In this latter scenario, rapalogs may turn out to constitute good candidates for the development of novel immunochemotherapeutic regimens [104].
Table 1. Preclinical evidence in support of the immunostimulatory activity of rapalogs.
Rapalog | Model | Stimulus | Observation(s) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Everolimus (RAD001) | Breast cancer-bearing mice | IL-15-coding plasmid | Improved inhibition of tumor growth | [95] |
HTLV1-infected T cells and patient-derived ATLL cells | IKK inhibitor | Decreased the secretion of IL-10 | [77] | |
Sprague-Dawley rats | Remnant kidney model | Worsened disease progression correlating with several markers of inflammation | [105] | |
Sirolimus (Rapamycin) | Human PBMCs and DCs | LPS from Escherichia coli | Increased NF-κB activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion; decreased STAT3 activation and IL-10 release | [78] |
Murine DCs | LPS from Escherichia coli | Increased secretion of IL-12 | [79] | |
Monocytes, macrophages and primary DCs | LPS from Escherichia coli | Increased NF-κB activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion; decreased STAT3 activation and IL-10 release | [80] | |
Murine DCs and C57Bl/10, C3H/HeJ, Il4ra−/− mice | LPS from Escherichia coli | Increased cytokine secretion and improved T-cell co-stimulation | [82] | |
Human whole blood | LPS, LTA or peptidoglycan | Inhibition of IL-10 secretion | [81] | |
HEK293 cells stably expressing TLR2 of TLR4 | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Increased IL-23 secretion at both the mRNA and protein level | [69] | |
Murine macrophages, DCs and C57Bl/6 mice | Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Enhanced TH1 responses in mice vaccinated with sirolimus-treated DCs | [73] | |
THP1 cells, primary human PBMCs and DCs | Staphylococcus aureus | Increased IL-12 secretion at both the mRNA and protein level | [68] | |
Wild-type and transgenic C57Bl/6 mice | Listeria monocytogenes | Improved antigen-specific T-cell responses in the course of infection | [70] | |
Traf6−/− mice | Attenuated Listeria monocytogenes strain | Improved long-lived CD8+ memory T-cell responses | [71] | |
DCs from wild-type and PI3K-deficient mice | Leishmania major | Improved IL-12 secretion by DCs, robust TH1 responses in vivo | [72] | |
Wild-type and transgenic Rag1−/− mice | Myxoma virus | Increased anticancer activity of adoptively transferred T lymphocytes | [75] | |
Old C57Bl/6 mice | Influenza virus | Improve production of B lymphocytes and optimal responses to vaccination | [76] | |
Wild-type and transgenic C57Bl/6 mice | LCMV and engineered vaccinia virus | Increased amounts of antigen-specific T cells | [74] | |
HUVECs | Thrombin | Increased NF-κB activation | [106] | |
Tumor-bearing transgenic C57Bl/6 mice | Anti-CD3/anti-CD8 antibodies Antigen-derived peptides plus CD80 | Generated OT-I cells that were more effective than IL-12-conditioned effector OT-I cells after adoptive transfer | [85] | |
Human PBMCs and TU167 cells | IL-2 and isopentenyl pyrophosphate | Increased the yield and effector function of human γδ T cells in vitro | [90] | |
Temsirolimus (CCI-779) | RCC and melanoma-bearing mice | HSP-based anticancer vaccine | Improved CD8+ T-cell memory responses and effector functions | [96] |
Abbreviations: ATLL, adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; DC, dendritic cell; HSP, heat-shock protein; HTLV-1, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; IKK, IκB kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; IL, interleukin; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LTA, peptidoglycan; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PI3K, phosphoinositide-3-kinase; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TLR, Toll-like receptor.
Table 2. Clinical evidence in support of the immunostimulatory activity of rapalogs.
Rapalog | Setting | Observation(s) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Everolimus (RAD001) | Cardiac transplantation | Decreased incidence of CMV infection among everolimus-treated patients | [62] |
Sirolimus (Rapamycin) | Liver transplantation | Limited rate of HCV progression and associated hepatic fibrosis | [107] |
Renal transplantation | Anemia correlating with biochemical evidence of a chronic inflammatory state | [56] | |
Renal transplantation | Development of glomerulonephritis upon conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression to rapamycin | [55] | |
Solid organ transplantation | Decreased incidence of CMV infection among sirolimus-treated patients | [63] | |
Solid organ transplantation | Decreased incidence of multiple tumors among sirolimus-treated patients | [42-48] | |
Solid organ transplantation | Consistent antitumor responses in patients with post-transplantation neoplasms treated with sirolimus | [50-54] | |
Temsirolimus (CCI-779) | Advanced cancer | No signs of immunosuppression among everolimus-treated patients | [108] |
Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.
Footnotes
The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.Campisi J, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2007;8:729–740. doi: 10.1038/nrm2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fossel M. Cell senescence in human aging and disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002;959:14–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02078.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harrison DE, Strong R, Sharp ZD, Nelson JF, Astle CM, Flurkey K, Nadon NL, Wilkinson JE, Frenkel K, Carter CS, Pahor M, Javors MA, Fernandez E, et al. Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature. 2009;460:392–395. doi: 10.1038/nature08221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bjedov I, Toivonen JM, Kerr F, Slack C, Jacobson J, Foley A, Partridge L. Mechanisms of life span extension by rapamycin in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Cell metabolism. 2010;11:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robida-Stubbs S, Glover-Cutter K, Lamming DW, Mizunuma M, Narasimhan SD, Neumann-Haefelin E, Sabatini DM, Blackwell TK. TOR signaling and rapamycin influence longevity by regulating SKN-1/Nrf and DAF-16/FoxO. Cell metabolism. 2012;15:713–724. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Powers RW, 3rd, Kaeberlein M, Caldwell SD, Kennedy BK, Fields S. Extension of chronological life span in yeast by decreased TOR pathway signaling. Genes & development. 2006;20:174–184. doi: 10.1101/gad.1381406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.He C, Bassik MC, Moresi V, Sun K, Wei Y, Zou Z, An Z, Loh J, Fisher J, Sun Q, Korsmeyer S, Packer M, May HI, et al. Exercise-induced BCL2-regulated autophagy is required for muscle glucose homeostasis. Nature. 2012;481:511–515. doi: 10.1038/nature10758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Autophagy mediates the metabolic benefits of endurance training. Circulation research. 2012;110:1276–1278. doi: 10.1161/RES.0b013e318259e70b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blagosklonny MV. Linking calorie restriction to longevity through sirtuins and autophagy: any role for TOR. Cell death & disease. 2010;1:e12. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2009.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Warr MR, Binnewies M, Flach J, Reynaud D, Garg T, Malhotra R, Debnath J, Passegue E. FOXO3A directs a protective autophagy program in haematopoietic stem cells. Nature. 2013;494:323–327. doi: 10.1038/nature11895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eisenberg T, Knauer H, Schauer A, Buttner S, Ruckenstuhl C, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Ring J, Schroeder S, Magnes C, Antonacci L, Fussi H, Deszcz L, Hartl R, et al. Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity. Nature cell biology. 2009;11:1305–1314. doi: 10.1038/ncb1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morselli E, Maiuri MC, Markaki M, Megalou E, Pasparaki A, Palikaras K, Criollo A, Galluzzi L, Malik SA, Vitale I, Michaud M, Madeo F, Tavernarakis N, et al. Caloric restriction and resveratrol promote longevity through the Sirtuin-1-dependent induction of autophagy. Cell death & disease. 2010;1:e10. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2009.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morselli E, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Criollo A, Maiuri MC, Tavernarakis N, Madeo F, Kroemer G. Autophagy mediates pharmacological lifespan extension by spermidine and resveratrol. Aging. 2009;1:961–970. doi: 10.18632/aging.100110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benjamin D, Colombi M, Moroni C, Hall MN. Rapamycin passes the torch: a new generation of mTOR inhibitors. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2011;10:868–880. doi: 10.1038/nrd3531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lamming DW, Ye L, Sabatini DM, Baur JA. Rapalogs and mTOR inhibitors as anti-aging therapeutics. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123:980–989. doi: 10.1172/JCI64099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B. Autophagy in human health and disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2013;368:1845–1846. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1303158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2007;8:931–937. doi: 10.1038/nrm2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jia K, Levine B. Autophagy is required for dietary restriction-mediated life span extension in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2007;3:597–599. doi: 10.4161/auto.4989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansen M, Chandra A, Mitic LL, Onken B, Driscoll M, Kenyon C. A role for autophagy in the extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in C. elegans. PLoS genetics. 2008;4:e24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dwivedi M, Song HO, Ahnn J. Autophagy genes mediate the effect of calcineurin on life span in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2009;5:604–607. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.5.8157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Minina EA, Sanchez-Vera V, Moschou PN, Suarez MF, Sundberg E, Weih M, Bozhkov PV. Autophagy mediates caloric restriction-induced lifespan extension in Arabidopsis. Aging cell. 2013;12:327–329. doi: 10.1111/acel.12048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pyo JO, Yoo SM, Ahn HH, Nah J, Hong SH, Kam TI, Jung S, Jung YK. Overexpression of Atg5 in mice activates autophagy and extends lifespan. Nature communications. 2013;4:2300. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hars ES, Qi H, Ryazanov AG, Jin S, Cai L, Hu C, Liu LF. Autophagy regulates ageing in C. elegans. Autophagy. 2007;3:93–95. doi: 10.4161/auto.3636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Green DR, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Mitochondria and the autophagy-inflammation-cell death axis in organismal aging. Science. 2011;333:1109–1112. doi: 10.1126/science.1201940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morselli E, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Vicencio JM, Criollo A, Maiuri MC, Kroemer G. Anti- and pro-tumor functions of autophagy. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2009;1793(9):1524–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.White E. Deconvoluting the context-dependent role for autophagy in cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2012;12:401–410. doi: 10.1038/nrc3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kroemer G, Marino G, Levine B. Autophagy and the integrated stress response. Molecular cell. 2010;40:280–293. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Martins I, Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Hormesis, cell death and aging. Aging. 2011;3:821–828. doi: 10.18632/aging.100380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–335. doi: 10.1038/nature09782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Benjamin JL, Sumpter R, Jr, Levine B, Hooper LV. Intestinal epithelial autophagy is essential for host defense against invasive bacteria. Cell host & microbe. 2013;13:723–734. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yi Y, Zhou Z, Shu S, Fang Y, Twitty C, Hilton TL, Aung S, Urba WJ, Fox BA, Hu HM, Li Y. Autophagy-assisted antigen cross-presentation: Autophagosome as the argo of shared tumor-specific antigens and DAMPs. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:976–978. doi: 10.4161/onci.20059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ma Y, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Autophagy and cellular immune responses. Immunity. 2013;39:211–227. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Michaud M, Sukkurwala AQ, Martins I, Shen S, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Subversion of the chemotherapy-induced anticancer immune response by the ecto-ATPase CD39. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:393–395. doi: 10.4161/onci.19070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Senovilla L, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Immunosurveillance as a regulator of tissue homeostasis. Trends in immunology. 2013;34:471–481. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Prendergast GC, Metz R. A perspective on new immune adjuvant principles: Reprogramming inflammatory states to permit clearance of cancer cells and other age-associated cellular pathologies. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:924–929. doi: 10.4161/onci.21358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Law BK. Rapamycin: an anti-cancer immunosuppressant? Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2005;56:47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Morelon E, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Peraldi MN, Kreis H. Sirolimus: a new promising immunosuppressive drug. Towards a rationale for its use in renal transplantation. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2001;16:18–20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/16.1.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sehgal SN, Molnar-Kimber K, Ocain TD, Weichman BM. Rapamycin: a novel immunosuppressive macrolide. Medicinal research reviews. 1994;14:1–22. doi: 10.1002/med.2610140102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kahan BD, Podbielski J, Napoli KL, Katz SM, Meier-Kriesche HU, Van Buren CT. Immunosuppressive effects and safety of a sirolimus/cyclosporine combination regimen for renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1998;66:1040–1046. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199810270-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brattstrom C, Sawe J, Tyden G, Herlenius G, Claesson K, Zimmerman J, Groth CG. Kinetics and dynamics of single oral doses of sirolimus in sixteen renal transplant recipients. Therapeutic drug monitoring. 1997;19:397–406. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199708000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blagosklonny MV. Immunosuppressants in cancer prevention and therapy Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e26961. doi: 10.4161/onci.26961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mathew T, Kreis H, Friend P. Two-year incidence of malignancy in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients: results from five multicenter studies. Clinical transplantation. 2004;18:446–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yakupoglu YK, Buell JF, Woodle S, Kahan BD. Individualization of immunosuppressive therapy. III. Sirolimus associated with a reduced incidence of malignancy. Transplantation proceedings. 2006;38:358–361. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Campistol JM, Eris J, Oberbauer R, Friend P, Hutchison B, Morales JM, Claesson K, Stallone G, Russ G, Rostaing L, Kreis H, Burke JT, Brault Y, et al. Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 2006;17:581–589. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005090993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alberu J, Pascoe MD, Campistol JM, Schena FP, Rial Mdel C, Polinsky M, Neylan JF, Korth-Bradley J, Goldberg-Alberts R, Maller ES, Sirolimus CTSG. Lower malignancy rates in renal allograft recipients converted to sirolimus-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free immunotherapy: 24-month results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. 2011;92:303–310. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182247ae2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kauffman HM, Cherikh WS, Cheng Y, Hanto DW, Kahan BD. Maintenance immunosuppression with target-of-rapamycin inhibitors is associated with a reduced incidence of de novo malignancies. Transplantation. 2005;80:883–889. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000184006.43152.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Salgo R, Gossmann J, Schofer H, Kachel HG, Kuck J, Geiger H, Kaufmann R, Scheuermann EH. Switch to a sirolimus-based immunosuppression in long-term renal transplant recipients: reduced rate of (pre-)malignancies and nonmelanoma skin cancer in a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled clinical trial. American journal of transplantation: official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2010;10:1385–1393. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Campbell SB, Walker R, Tai SS, Jiang Q, Russ GR. Randomized controlled trial of sirolimus for renal transplant recipients at high risk for nonmelanoma skin cancer. American journal of transplantation: official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2012;12:1146–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.London NJ, Farmery SM, Will EJ, Davison AM, Lodge JP. Risk of neoplasia in renal transplant patients. Lancet. 1995;346:403–406. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92780-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mohsin N, Budruddin M, Pakkyara A, Darweesh A, Nayyer M, Amitabh J, Daar AS. Complete regression of visceral Kaposi's sarcoma after conversion to sirolimus. Experimental and clinical transplantation: official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation. 2005;3:366–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zmonarski SC, Boratynska M, Puziewicz-Zmonarska A, Kazimierczak K, Klinger M. Kaposi's sarcoma in renal transplant recipients. Annals of transplantation: quarterly of the Polish Transplantation Society. 2005;10:59–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zmonarski SC, Boratynska M, Rabczynski J, Kazimierczak K, Klinger M. Regression of Kaposi's sarcoma in renal graft recipients after conversion to sirolimus treatment. Transplantation proceedings. 2005;37:964–966. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cullis B, D'Souza R, McCullagh P, Harries S, Nicholls A, Lee R, Bingham C. Sirolimus-induced remission of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2006;47:e67–72. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Stallone G, Schena A, Infante B, Di Paolo S, Loverre A, Maggio G, Ranieri E, Gesualdo L, Schena FP, Grandaliano G. Sirolimus for Kaposi's sarcoma in renal-transplant recipients. The New England journal of medicine. 2005;352:1317–1323. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dittrich E, Schmaldienst S, Soleiman A, Horl WH, Pohanka E. Rapamycin-associated post-transplantation glomerulonephritis and its remission after reintroduction of calcineurin-inhibitor therapy. Transplant international: official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation. 2004;17:215–220. doi: 10.1007/s00147-004-0700-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Thaunat O, Beaumont C, Chatenoud L, Lechaton S, Mamzer-Bruneel MF, Varet B, Kreis H, Morelon E. Anemia after late introduction of sirolimus may correlate with biochemical evidence of a chronic inflammatory state. Transplantation. 2005;80:1212–1219. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000179106.07382.6a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, Hutson TE, Porta C, Bracarda S, Grunwald V, Thompson JA, Figlin RA, Hollaender N, Urbanowitz G, Berg WJ, Kay A, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372:449–456. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Krueger DA, Care MM, Holland K, Agricola K, Tudor C, Mangeshkar P, Wilson KA, Byars A, Sahmoud T, Franz DN. Everolimus for subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363:1801–1811. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, Tomassetti P, Pavel ME, Hoosen S, et al. Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;364:514–523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA, 3rd, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, Noguchi S, Gnant M, Pritchard KI, Lebrun F, Beck JT, Ito Y, Yardley D, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;366:520–529. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Araki K, Ellebedy AH, Ahmed R. TOR in the immune system. Current opinion in cell biology. 2011;23:707–715. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hill JA, Hummel M, Starling RC, Kobashigawa JA, Perrone SV, Arizon JM, Simonsen S, Abeywickrama KH, Bara C. A lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in de novo heart transplant recipients randomized to everolimus. Transplantation. 2007;84:1436–1442. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000290686.68910.bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Demopoulos L, Polinsky M, Steele G, Mines D, Blum M, Caulfield M, Adamkovic A, Liu Q, Harler MB, Hahn C, Singh A. Reduced risk of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients treated with sirolimus: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Transplantation proceedings. 2008;40:1407–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pollack BP. EGFR inhibitors, MHC expression and immune responses: Can EGFR inhibitors be used as immune response modifiers? Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:71–74. doi: 10.4161/onci.1.1.18073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zoncu R, Efeyan A, Sabatini DM. mTOR: from growth signal integration to cancer, diabetes and ageing. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2011;12:21–35. doi: 10.1038/nrm3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wouters BG, Koritzinsky M. Hypoxia signalling through mTOR and the unfolded protein response in cancer. Nature reviews Cancer. 2008;8:851–864. doi: 10.1038/nrc2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nature reviews Cancer. 2009;9:563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrc2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Uthaisangsook S, Day NK, Hitchcock R, Lerner A, James-Yarish M, Good RA, Haraguchi S. Negative regulation of interleukin-12 production by a rapamycin-sensitive signaling pathway: a brief communication. Experimental biology and medicine. 2003;228:1023–1027. doi: 10.1177/153537020322800906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yang CS, Song CH, Lee JS, Jung SB, Oh JH, Park J, Kim HJ, Park JK, Paik TH, Jo EK. Intracellular network of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, mammalian target of the rapamycin/70 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase 1, and mitogen-activated protein kinases pathways for regulating mycobacteria-induced IL-23 expression in human macrophages. Cellular microbiology. 2006;8:1158–1171. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ferrer IR, Wagener ME, Robertson JM, Turner AP, Araki K, Ahmed R, Kirk AD, Larsen CP, Ford ML. Cutting edge: Rapamycin augments pathogen-specific but not graft-reactive CD8+ T cell responses. Journal of immunology. 2010;185:2004–2008. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang LS, Jones RG, Choi Y. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fukao T, Tanabe M, Terauchi Y, Ota T, Matsuda S, Asano T, Kadowaki T, Takeuchi T, Koyasu S. PI3K-mediated negative feedback regulation of IL-12 production in DCs. Nature immunology. 2002;3:875–881. doi: 10.1038/ni825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jagannath C, Lindsey DR, Dhandayuthapani S, Xu Y, Hunter RL, Jr, Eissa NT. Autophagy enhances the efficacy of BCG vaccine by increasing peptide presentation in mouse dendritic cells. Nature medicine. 2009;15:267–276. doi: 10.1038/nm.1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, Larsen CP, Ahmed R. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Thomas DL, Doty R, Tosic V, Liu J, Kranz DM, McFadden G, Macneill AL, Roy EJ. Myxoma virus combined with rapamycin treatment enhances adoptive T cell therapy for murine melanoma brain tumors. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy: CII. 2011;60:1461–1472. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-1045-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chen C, Liu Y, Liu Y, Zheng P. mTOR regulation and therapeutic rejuvenation of aging hematopoietic stem cells. Science signaling. 2009;2:ra75. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nishioka C, Ikezoe T, Yang J, Udaka K, Yokoyama A. The combination of IkappaB kinase beta inhibitor and everolimus modulates expression of interleukin-10 in human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-1-infected T cells. Immunology. 2013;138:216–227. doi: 10.1111/imm.12035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Haidinger M, Poglitsch M, Geyeregger R, Kasturi S, Zeyda M, Zlabinger GJ, Pulendran B, Horl WH, Saemann MD, Weichhart T. A versatile role of mammalian target of rapamycin in human dendritic cell function and differentiation. Journal of immunology. 2010;185:3919–3931. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ohtani M, Nagai S, Kondo S, Mizuno S, Nakamura K, Tanabe M, Takeuchi T, Matsuda S, Koyasu S. Mammalian target of rapamycin and glycogen synthase kinase 3 differentially regulate lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-12 production in dendritic cells. Blood. 2008;112:635–643. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-137430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Weichhart T, Costantino G, Poglitsch M, Rosner M, Zeyda M, Stuhlmeier KM, Kolbe T, Stulnig TM, Horl WH, Hengstschlager M, Muller M, Saemann MD. The TSC-mTOR signaling pathway regulates the innate inflammatory response. Immunity. 2008;29:565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jorgensen PF, Wang JE, Almlof M, Solberg R, Okkenhaug C, Scholz T, Thiemermann C, Foster SJ, Aasen AO. Sirolimus interferes with the innate response to bacterial products in human whole blood by attenuation of IL-10 production. Scandinavian journal of immunology. 2001;53:184–191. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.2001.00862.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Hackstein H, Taner T, Zahorchak AF, Morelli AE, Logar AJ, Gessner A, Thomson AW. Rapamycin inhibits IL-4--induced dendritic cell maturation in vitro and dendritic cell mobilization and function in vivo. Blood. 2003;101:4457–4463. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Vacchelli E, Galluzzi L, Eggermont A, Fridman WH, Galon J, Sautes-Fridman C, Tartour E, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Trial watch: FDA-approved Toll-like receptor agonists for cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:894–907. doi: 10.4161/onci.20931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Galluzzi L, Vacchelli E, Eggermont A, Fridman WH, Galon J, Sautes-Fridman C, Tartour E, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Trial Watch: Experimental Toll-like receptor agonists for cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:699–716. doi: 10.4161/onci.20696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rao RR, Li Q, Odunsi K, Shrikant PA. The mTOR kinase determines effector versus memory CD8+ T cell fate by regulating the expression of transcription factors T-bet and Eomesodermin. Immunity. 2010;32:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.You CX, Shi M, Liu Y, Cao M, Luo R, Hermonat PL. AAV2/IL-12 gene delivery into dendritic cells (DC) enhances CTL stimulation above other IL-12 applications: Evidence for IL-12 intracrine activity in DC. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:847–855. doi: 10.4161/onci.20504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Song DG, Powell DJ. Pro-survival signaling via CD27 costimulation drives effective CAR T-cell therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:547–549. doi: 10.4161/onci.19458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Li Q, Rao R, Vazzana J, Goedegebuure P, Odunsi K, Gillanders W, Shrikant PA. Regulating mammalian target of rapamycin to tune vaccination-induced CD8(+) T cell responses for tumor immunity. Journal of immunology. 2012;188:3080–3087. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Srivastava RK, Utley A, Shrikant PA. Rapamycin: A rheostat for CD8(+) T-cell-mediated tumor therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1189–1190. doi: 10.4161/onci.20663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li H, Pauza CD. Rapamycin increases the yield and effector function of human gammadelta T cells stimulated in vitro. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy: CII. 2011;60:361–370. doi: 10.1007/s00262-010-0945-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Putz EM, Schuster C, Sexl V. Bcl-2: Live and let die. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:749–750. doi: 10.4161/onci.19536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Anderson J, Gustafsson K, Himoudi N, Yan M, Heuijerjans J. Licensing of gammadeltaT cells for professional antigen presentation: A new role for antibodies in regulation of antitumor immune responses. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1652–1654. doi: 10.4161/onci.21971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gertner-Dardenne J, Fauriat C, Vey N, Olive D. Immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia based on gammadelta T cells. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1614–1616. doi: 10.4161/onci.21512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, Staroslawska E, Sosman J, McDermott D, Bodrogi I, Kovacevic Z, Lesovoy V, Schmidt-Wolf IG, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2007;356:2271–2281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Zhao N, Li X, He X, Qiu Y, Zhu L, Qi F. Interleukin-15 gene therapy and the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus inhibit the growth of metastatic breast cancer. The journal of gene medicine. 2013;15:366–374. doi: 10.1002/jgm.2739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wang Y, Wang XY, Subjeck JR, Shrikant PA, Kim HL. Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, enhances anti-tumour effects of heat shock protein cancer vaccines. British journal of cancer. 2011;104:643–652. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Vacchelli E, Martins I, Eggermont A, Fridman WH, Galon J, Sautes-Fridman C, Tartour E, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Trial watch: Peptide vaccines in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1557–1576. doi: 10.4161/onci.22428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Metz R, Rust S, Duhadaway JB, Mautino MR, Munn DH, Vahanian NN, Link CJ, Prendergast GC. IDO inhibits a tryptophan sufficiency signal that stimulates mTOR: A novel IDO effector pathway targeted by D-1-methyl-tryptophan. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1460–1468. doi: 10.4161/onci.21716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Araki K, Youngblood B, Ahmed R. The role of mTOR in memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Immunological reviews. 2010;235:234–243. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2010.00898.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hoos A, Janetzki S, Britten CM. Advancing the field of cancer immunotherapy: MIATA consensus guidelines become available to improve data reporting and interpretation for T-cell immune monitoring. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1457–1459. doi: 10.4161/onci.22308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Senovilla L, Vacchelli E, Galon J, Adjemian S, Eggermont A, Fridman WH, Sautes-Fridman C, Ma Y, Tartour E, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L. Trial watch: Prognostic and predictive value of the immune infiltrate in cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1323–1343. doi: 10.4161/onci.22009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Malvicini M, Alaniz L, Bayo J, Garcia M, Piccioni F, Fiore E, Atorrasagasti C, Aquino JB, Matar P, Mazzolini G. Single low-dose cyclophosphamide combined with interleukin-12 gene therapy is superior to a metronomic schedule in inducing immunity against colorectal carcinoma in mice. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:1038–1047. doi: 10.4161/onci.20684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Galluzzi L, Senovilla L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. The secret ally: immunostimulation by anticancer drugs. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2012;11:215–233. doi: 10.1038/nrd3626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Egilmez NK, Harden JL, Rowswell-Turner RB. Chemoimmunotherapy as long-term maintenance therapy for cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:563–565. doi: 10.4161/onci.19369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Vogelbacher R, Wittmann S, Braun A, Daniel C, Hugo C. The mTOR inhibitor everolimus induces proteinuria and renal deterioration in the remnant kidney model in the rat. Transplantation. 2007;84:1492–1499. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000282866.92367.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Minhajuddin M, Fazal F, Bijli KM, Amin MR, Rahman A. Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin potentiates thrombin-induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression by accelerating and stabilizing NF-kappa B activation in endothelial cells. Journal of immunology. 2005;174:5823–5829. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.McKenna GJ, Trotter JF, Klintmalm E, Onaca N, Ruiz R, Jennings LW, Neri M, O'Leary JG, Davis GL, Levy MF, Goldstein RM, Klintmalm GB. Limiting hepatitis C virus progression in liver transplant recipients using sirolimus-based immunosuppression. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2011;11:2379–2387. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Raymond E, Alexandre J, Faivre S, Vera K, Materman E, Boni J, Leister C, Korth-Bradley J, Hanauske A, Armand JP. Safety and pharmacokinetics of escalated doses of weekly intravenous infusion of CCI-779, a novel mTOR inhibitor, in patients with cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:2336–2347. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]