Abstract
Objective
To determine the proportion of imported frozen fish contaminated with Salmonella among retail food stores and supermarkets in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
Methods
A total of 223 frozen freshwater fish purchased from different supermarkets and grocery stores were analyzed for the presence of foodborne pathogen Salmonella. The isolation of Salmonella was determined and confirmed by using the methods of US Food and Drug Administration's Bacteriological Analytical Manual, CHROMagar Salmonella plus, biochemical tests and API 20E strips. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonella isolates were determined by the disk diffusion method on Muller-Hinton agar, as described by Kirby-Bauer, in accordance with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Results
Out of the total 223 fish samples (20 of catfish, 18 of carfu, 20 of mirgal, 25 of milkfish, 35 of mackerel, 75 of tilapia, and 30 of rohu), 89 (39.9%) were tested positive for Salmonella. The prevalence of positive samples were reported for the freshwater fish of pangas (60.0%, n=12), carfu (27.7%, n=5), mirgal (35.0%, n=7), milkfish (52.0%, n=13), mackerel (31.4 %, n=11), tilapia imported from Thailand (64.0%, n=16), tilapia imported from India (28.0%, n=14), rohu imported from Thailand (26.6%, n=4) and rohu imported from Myanmar (46.6%, n=7). A total of 140 isolates of Salmonella spp. were yielded from at least seven different types of frozen freshwater fish imported from 5 different countries and were tested for their susceptibility to 16 selected antimicrobial agents. The highest antibiotic resistance was observed to tetracycline (90.71%) followed by ampicillin (70%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (45%).
Conclusions
The obtained results of this study shows that these raw retail imported frozen freshwater fish are contaminated with potentially pathogenic Salmonella spp. And the study recommend and suggest that there is a need for adequate consumer measures.
Keywords: Salmonella, Antibiogram, Frozen fish, Food safety
1. Introduction
Capture fisheries and aquaculture supplied the world with about 148 million tonnes of fish in 2010 (with a total value of USD 217.5 billion, of which about 128 million tonnes was utilized as food for people, and preliminary data for 2011 indicate increased production of 154 million tonnes, of which 131 million tonnes was destined as food[1]. There is a global trade in aquaculture products which has considerably increased in recent decades, and the expansion of aquaculture production, particularly from Asia, has the potential to meet most of the growing global demand for fish and fishery products[2]. According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), aquaculture supplies about 50% of the global demand for fish and fishery products with about 90% of the aquaculture products coming from Asian region[3]. Fishery products have been recognized as a major carrier of food-borne pathogens[4],[5]. Pathogenic bacteria associated with fish and fishery product can be categorized into three general groups: (1) indigenous bacteria that belong to the natural microflora of fish (Clostridium botulinum, pathogenic Vibrio spp., Aeromonas hydrophila); (2) enteric bacteria (nonindigenous bacteria) that are present due to fecal contamination (Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., pathogenic Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus); and (3) bacterial contamination during processing, storage or preparation for consumption (Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella spp.)[6].
Salmonella is a member of Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe, motile, with peritrichous flagella, non-spore forming rods that responsible of causing salmonellosis. In humans, these pathogenic bacteria caused enteric fever (typhi or paratyphi) and acute gastroenteritis[7].
In Saudi Arabia, data regarding the presence of medically significant Salmonella spp. in imported frozen freshwater fish are limited or not available. Thus, present study was conducted to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. in imported frozen freshwater fish imp in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
2. Materials and methods
Sample collection
Starting from December 2012 till March 2013, a total of 223 frozen freshwater fishes (Catfish, Carfu, Mirgal, Milkfish, Mackerel, Tilapia and Rohu) were purchased from different supermarkets and grocery stores. The samples originated from five countries, namely, Thailand, India, Bahrain, Myanmar and Vietnam, respectively. All fish samples during collection were placed in sterile polypropylene bag, placed in polystyrene box containing crushed ice and the temperatures was between 4 °C and 8 °C during transportation. The samples were transported to the laboratory and examined on the same day for the presence of Salmonella spp.
2.2. Isolation and biochemical identification
The isolation of Salmonella was determined by using the methods described in Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM, 2011)[8]. The fish samples were gently removed from coolers and processed in aseptic condition. The gills, intestines parts and skin parts were removed by using sterile knifes and forceps and placed on sterile tray and chopped thoroughly with sterile knife. About 25 g of samples (fish gills, intestines parts and skin) were placed into a stomacher bag containing 225 mL of buffered peptone water and homogenized using a stomacher (Seward Stomacher 400 circulator, UK) for 2 min and incubated for 18-24 h at 37 °C. From this nonselective pre-enrichment, 0.1 mL and 1.0 mL were, respectively, transferred into 10 mL of Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and 10 mL of selenite cystine broth, and incubated for 18-24 h at 42 °C (Rappaport-Vassiliadis) and at 37 °C (selenite cystine). A drop from each selective enrichment broth was streaked onto selective Hektoen agar, Rambach agar and CHROMagar Salmonella agar (CHROMagar, Paris, France) plates and incubated for 24-48 h at 37 °C. Suspected colonies on selective agar plates were purified and bio-typed by using biochemical tests and API 20E strips (BioMerieux, Marcy, France). Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar enteritidis American Type Culture Collection 13076 was used as a reference strain for CHROMagar, biochemical tests and API 20E strips.
2.3. Antibiotic susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the disk diffusion method on Muller-Hinton agar, as described by Kirby-Bauer, in accordance with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The isolates were tested against 18 antibiotics which included: amikacin 30 µg, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 30 µg, ampicillin 10 µg, cefotaxime 30 µg, ceftazidime 30 µg, ceftriaxone 30 µg, chloramphenicol 30 µg, ciprofloxacin 5 µg, kanamycin 30 µg, nalidixic acid 30 µg, nitrofurantoin 300 µg, norfloxacin 10 µg, piperacillin 100 µg, polymyxin B 300 units, tetracycline 30 µg, ticarcillin 75 µg, tobramycin 10 µg, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25 µg/23.75 µg). The antibiotics discs were obtained from Oxoid (Baringstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom). Cultures were grown overnight in tryptic soy broth and incubated at 37 °C. The overnight cultures were diluted to a turbidity of 0.5 on McFarland scale. The cultures were streaked on Mueller Hinton Agar (Oxoid, Baringstoke, Hampshire, United Kingdom) plates using a cotton swab. After 30 min, 3-4 antibiotic discs were placed on the plates and were incubated at 37 °C for 18-24 h. After the incubation period, the diameter of inhibition zones was measured and compared with interpretive chart proposed by the ‘Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests’ and which were classified as resistant (CLSI, 2010)[9]. Escherichia coli American Type Culture Collection 25922 was used as a reference strain for antimicrobial disk control.
2.4. Statistical analysis
Overall prevalence rates for specific fish types were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The distribution of antibiotic resistance was compared for the three groups of resistance, intermediate and susceptible. The distribution of antibiotic resistance for each fish type was used to calculate two measures of diversity, dominance and entropy, widely used in ecology. The dominance measure ranges from 0 in which all antibiotics (in this case) are equally present, to 1, in which one antibiotic dominates. The entropy measures ranges from 0 in which only one antibiotic is present (no diversity) to high values, showing that different antibiotics are present. The calculations were done using PAST software version 2.04[10].
3. Results
The prevalence and contamination rates of imported frozen fish with Salmonella are presented in Table 1. Out of 223 samples examined, 140 Salmonella spp. isolates were isolated. Salmonella spp. were detected in 89 fish samples with prevalence rate of 39.9%. The prevalence of positive samples were reported for the freshwater fish of catfish (60.0%, n=12), carfu (27.7%, n=5), mirgal (35.0%, n=7), milkfish (52.0%, n=13), mackerel (31.4%, n=11), tilapia imported from Thailand (64.0%, n=16), tilapia imported from India (28.0%, n=14), rohu imported from Thailand (26.6%, n=4) and rohu imported from Myanmar (46.6 %, n=7) as shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in raw retail frozen imported fish to Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
| Fish type | Country | No. of samples | No. of positive samples | Prevalence (%) | No. of isolates |
| Catfish | Thailand | 20 | 12 | 60.0 | 28 |
| Carfu | Thailand | 18 | 5 | 27.7 | 9 |
| Mirgal | Thailand | 20 | 7 | 35.0 | 12 |
| Milkfish | Vietnam | 25 | 13 | 52.0 | 15 |
| Mackerel | Bahrain | 35 | 11 | 31.4 | 13 |
| Tilapia | Thailand | 25 | 16 | 64.0 | 20 |
| Tilapia | India | 50 | 14 | 28.0 | 22 |
| Rohu | Thailand | 15 | 4 | 26.6 | 8 |
| Rohu | Myanmar | 15 | 7 | 46.6 | 13 |
| Total | 223 | 89 | 39.9 | 140 |
All isolates (140) of Salmonella spp. isolated from at least seven different types of frozen freshwater fish imported from five different countries were tested for their susceptibility to 18 selected antimicrobial agents. Most of Salmonella isolates showed resistance to tetracycline (90.71%, n=127) followed by ampicillin (70%, n=98) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (45%, n=63) as presented in Table 2. The highest antibiograms of Salmonella exhibited resistance to tetracycline, ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were isolated from catfish, tilapia (India), tilapia (Thailand), rohu, milkfish and mirgal, respectively. The lowest antibiograms of Salmonella exhibited resistance to tetracycline, ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were isolated from mackerel and carfu imported Bahrain and Thailand, respectively. As Table 2 shows, the highest value of dominance is for number of resistance isolates, for those ones, tetracycline predominates.
Table 2. Antibiogram of Salmonella spp. isolated from raw retail frozen imported fish to Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
| Antibiotic | No. of resistant isolates (%) | No. of intermediate isolates (%) | No. of susceptible isolates (%) |
| Amikacin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 63 (45) | 0 | 77 (55) |
| Ampicillin | 98 (70) | 0 | 42 (30) |
| Cefotaxime | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftazidime | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chloramphenicol | 0 | 28 (20) | 112 (80) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kanamycin | 0 | 36 (25.71) | 104 (74.28) |
| Nalidixic acid | 0 | 25 (17.85) | 115 (82.14) |
| Nitrofurantoin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Norfloxacin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Piperacillin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Polymyxin B | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tetracycline | 127 (90.71) | 0 | 13 (9.28) |
| Ticarcillin | 0 | 48 (34. 28) | 92 (65.71) |
| Tobramycin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Measures of diversity based on antimicrobial of Salmonella spp. | |||
| Dominance D | 0.3581 | 0.2669 | 0.1718 |
| Shannon H | 1.06 | 1.354 | 1.818 |
n=140.
The highest value of antimicrobial diversity is for number of susceptibility, for those ones, none of antibiotics predominates. Partly because of the absence of resistance in many of the antibiotics, comparison of the three groups (resistant, intermediate and susceptible) using the Kruskal-Wallis test did not yield any statistical significance between them (H=2.898, P=0.392 9).
4. Discussion
In this study, Salmonella spp. were isolated from at least seven different types of frozen fish (pangas, carfu, mirgal, milkfish, mackerel, tilapia and rohu) imported from five different countries (Thailand, India, Bahrain, Vietnam and Myanmar) to Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The overall prevalence of Salmonella spp. contamination of frozen imported fish (39.9%) observed in this study is significantly very high. Salmonella contaminates in fish and fishery products have also been reported from other countries and areas such as India, Mexico, Thailand, Hong Kong, Spain and Turkey[11]–[14]. The highest Salmonella incidence in fishery products was determined in Central Pacific and African countries while it was lower in Europe and including Russia and North America[15]. In this study, the highest numbers of Salmonella strains were isolated from catfish (imported from Thailand), tilapia (imported from India), tilapia (imported from Thailand), milkfish (imported from Vietnam), rohu (imported from Mynmar), mackerel (imported from Bahrain) and mirgal (imported from Thailand), while the lowest number of Salmonella strains were isolated from carfu and rohu (imported from Thailand).
In the Asia-Pacific region, cultured fishes are fed by both commercial and homemade feeds (fresh feed material or farm feed material). According to FAO, homemade feeds are used to reduce cost of production[16]. Homemade feed is usually made from chicken viscera, kitchen refuse, chicken bone and other food waste materials[17]. Such feeds can be a source of pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella spp. which can be transmitted to catfish and tilapia and ultimately to consumers[18]. In a recent study in Malaysia, Budiati et al. reported that feeds, such as chicken offals and spoiled eggs, can posed a potential source of Salmonella spp. and the high risks associated with the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria associated with catfish, tilapia and environment of aquaculture systems[19]. In this study, number of Salmonella isolates resistant to tetracycline (90.71%) followed by ampicillin (70%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (45%), and this could indicate and reflect the wide spread use of excessive antibiotics in fish farming. The increase and spread of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella has been associated with extensive use of antimicrobial agents, not only in human and veterinary medicine, but also in livestock production for disease prevention or as growth promoters in the animal husbandry and aquaculture which lead to development of resistance among environmental species[20]–[22]. This increase of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella phenomenon could limit the therapeutic options for clinical cases that require antimicrobial treatment[23].
The main finding in the study is that there were high rates of Salmonella contamination of a wide variety of imported freshwater frozen fish to Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, and this highlights a lack of applications of adequate hygiene for Salmonella control in the fisheries production in some countries. Thus, to ensure the safety of imported fish and fisheries products for human consumption, the study recommends the surveillance of foodborne Salmonella through all imported frozen fish and fisheries products should be adopted and considered seriously by food control authorities in the study region.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the participating laboratory specialists Lauro Bartolome, Abdulrahim Osman and Bader Sager for constructive collaboration. This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research, University of Dammam (Grant No. 2012139).
Comments
Background
This study was conducted in order to determine the proportion of imported frozen fish contaminated with Salmonella among retail food stores and supermarkets in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
Research frontiers
Salmonella is a member of Enterobacteriaceae, Gram-negative, facultative anaerobe, motile, with peritrichous flagella, non-spore forming rods that responsible of causing salmonellosis. In humans, these pathogenic bacteria caused enteric fever (typhi or paratyphi) and acute gastroenteritis.
Related reports
There is a global trade in aquaculture products which has considerably increased in recent decades and the expansion of aquaculture production, particularly from Asia, has the potential to meet most of the growing global demand for fish and fishery products. According to FAO, aquaculture supplies about 50% of the global demand for fish and fishery products with about 90% of the aquaculture products coming from the Asian region.
Innovations and breakthroughs
The obtained results of this study shows that these raw retail imported frozen freshwater fish are contaminated with potentially pathogenic Salmonella spp., and the study recommends and suggests that there is a need for adequate consumer measures.
Applications
In Saudi Arabia, data regarding the presence of medically significant Salmonella spp. in imported frozen freshwater fish are limited or not available. Thus, present study was conducted to determine the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella spp. in imported frozen freshwater fish imported in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.
Peer review
This is a good research work in which author determined the proportion of imported frozen fish contaminated with Salmonella spp. among retail food stores and supermarkets in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The results add valuable informations to the formulation of food safety and food hygiene measures.
Footnotes
Foundation Project: Supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, University of Dammam (Grant No. 2012139).
Conflict of interest statement: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2012. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. [Online] Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2727e/i2727e.pdf. [Accessed on 23rd September, 2013] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. Food outlook. Biannual report on global food markets. [Online] Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/al999e/al999e.pdf. [Accessed on 24th September, 2013] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. [Online] Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e.pdf. [Accessed on 24th September, 2013] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yücel N, Balci S. Prevalence of listeria, Aeromonas, and Vibrio species in fish used for human consumption in Turkey. J Food Prot. 2010;73(2):380–384. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.2.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Upadhyay BP, Utrarachkij F, Thongshoob J, Mahakunkijcharoen Y, Wongchinda N, Suthienkul O, et al. et al. Detection of Salmonella invA gene in shrimp enrichment culture by polymerase chain reaction. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2010;41(2):426–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lyhs U. Microbiological methods. In: Rehbein H, Oehlenschläger J, editors. Fishery products: quality, safety and authenticity. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2009. pp. 318–348. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hohmann EL. Nontyphoidal salmonellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32(2):263–269. doi: 10.1086/318457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Andrews WH, Jacobson A, Hammack T. Salmonella, chapter 5. In: Hammack T, Feng P, Jinneman K, Regan PM, Julie J, Palmer Orlandi P, et al., editors. Bacterial analytical manual. Silver Spring: Food and Drug Administration; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clinical And Laboratory Standards Institute . Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, informal supplement, M100S20. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hammer O, Harper DA, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):9. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huss HH, Ababouch L, Gram L. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2004. Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality. [Online] Available from: http://www.best-bfq.org/downloads/QA-Program/FAO-Assessment-and-magmt-of-seafood-quality-and-safety-FT-paper-444.pdf. [Accessed on 28th October, 2013] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Herrera FC, Santos JA, Oteroand A, García-López ML. Occurrence of foodborne pathogenic bacteria in retail prepackaged portions of marine fish in Spain. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100(3):527–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kumar R, Surendran PK, Thampuran N. Detection and characterization of virulence factors in lactose positive and lactose negative Salmonella serovars isolated from seafood. Food Control. 2009;20(4):376–380. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pamuk S, Gurler Z, Yildirim Y, Siriken B. Detection of microbiological auality of common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) sold in public Baazar in Afyonkarahisar. J Anim Vet Adv. 2011;10(8):1012–1018. [Google Scholar]
- 15.New MB, Csavas I. Aquafeeds in Asia: a regional overview. In: New MB, Tacon AG, Csavas I, editors. Farm-made aquafeeds. Rome: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 343; [Google Scholar]
- 16.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2010. FAO expert workshop on the application of biosecurity measures to control Salmonella Contamination in Sustainable aquaculture. [Online] Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1547e/i1547e00.pdf. [Accessed on 28th October, 2013] [Google Scholar]
- 17.New MB, Tacon AGJ, Csavas I, editors. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific; 1993. Farm-made aquafeeds. Proceedings of the regional expert consultation on farm-made aquafeeds; 1992 Dec 14-18; Bangkok, Thailand. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lunestad BT, Nesse L, Lassen J, Svihus B, Nesbakken T, Fossum K, et al. et al. Salmonella infish feed; occurrence and implications for fish and human health in Norway. Aquaculture. 2007;265:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Budiati T, Rusul G, Wan-Abdullah WN, Atrip YM, Ahmad R, Thong KL. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and plasmid profiling of Salmonella in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and tilapia (Tilapia mossambica) obtained from wet markets and ponds in Malaysia. Aquaculture. 2013;372-375:127–132. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Romero J, Feijoó CG, Navarrete P. Antibiotics in aquaculture: Use, abuse and alternatives. In: Carvalho E, editor. Health and environment in aquaculture. Santiago: InTech Publisher; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Angkititrakul S, Chomvarin C, Chaita T, Kanistanon K, Waethewutajarn S. Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolated from pork, chicken meat and humans in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36(6):1510–1515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Little CL, Richardson JF, Owen RJ, de Pinna E, Threlfall EJ. Campylobacter and Salmonella in raw red meats in the United Kingdom: prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance pattern, 2003-2005. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(3):538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cruchaga S, Echeita A, Aladueña A, García-Peña J, Frias N, Usera MA. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonellae from humans, food and animals in Spain in 1998. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47(3):315–321. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.3.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
