Abstract
We report the draft genome sequences of Geomyces pannorum sensu lato and Geomyces (Pseudogymnoascus) destructans. G. pannorum has a larger proteome than G. destructans, containing more proteins with ascribed enzymatic functions. This dichotomy in the genomes of related psychrophilic fungi is a valuable target for defining their distinct saprobic and pathogenic attributes.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Geomyces pannorum is a soil-dwelling fungus common in colder parts of the world (1–3). G. pannorum is rarely implicated in the human disease geomycosis, which manifests as skin and nail infections (4–6). Geomyces destructans is the etiologic agent of bat geomycosis or white nose syndrome (WNS) (7, 8). G. destructans is restricted to caves and mines in the United States and Europe (9, 10). G. pannorum sensu lato represents a species complex, while G. destructans was recently reclassified as Pseudogymnoascus destructans (2, 9). As taxonomy is in a state of flux, G. destructans and G. pannorum will be used as the organism names throughout this work. Both fungi are adapted to a psychrophilic range (4° to 15°C) and express enzymes implicated in fungal virulence (1, 3, 8, 11). The study of the biology and pathogenicity of psychrophilic fungi is in its infancy due to a lack of experimental tools. This is also true for other eukaryotes inhabiting colder parts of the earth.
Genomic DNA from G. pannorum M1372 and G. destructans M1379 was obtained by phenol-chloroform extraction of pulverized fungal mycelia. The Illumina HiSeq 2000 was used for 100-base paired-end sequencing. The assemblies were generated using four programs, subsampling 89 million reads for G. pannorum and 88 million reads for G. destructans. Optimal assemblies representing 100× coverage for G. pannorum and 150× coverage for G. destructans were generated with MaSuRCA version 1.9.2 (12). The G. pannorum assembly is 29.47 Mb, with a G+C content of 50.5%, and comprises 856 scaffolds ranging in length from 300 bases to 839 kb (average, 34.4 kb; median, 7.9 kb; N50, 105 kb). G. destructans is 30.49 Mb, with a G+C content of 49.8%, and was assembled into 5,008 scaffolds of length 108 bases to 234 kb (average, 6.1 kb; median, 1.8 kb; N50, 19.2 kb). Fifty-two percent of the G. destructans reference DNA shares similarity with G. pannorum query DNA, with 45% of it being identical. A custom ab initio gene prediction pipeline generated 9,689 G. pannorum proteins and 7,967 G. destructans proteins. The difference in the coding density, which is 48% for G. pannorum and 37% for G. destructans, is attributable to the smaller number of proteins and numerous repeats (25.8% of the genome) in G. destructans than in G. pannorum (5.40% repeats). CEGMA predicted 96.7% of the 458 conserved genes in G. destructans and 98.3% in G. pannorum (13). Functional annotation with BLAST against UniProt (14) and HMM searches against TIGRfams/Pfams (15, 16) yielded Gene Ontology annotations (17) for 62.3% of the G. destructans proteins and 63.1% of the G. pannorum proteins. EC assignments were given to 2,052 G. destructans proteins (25.8%) and 2,734 G. pannorum proteins (28.2%). Thus, G. pannorum contains more proteins than G. destructans, including more with ascribed enzymatic functions. This dichotomy in the genomes of related psychrophilic fungi is a valuable target for defining their distinct saprobic and pathogenic attributes.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The G. (Pseudogymnoascus) destructans whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AYKP00000000. The version described in this paper is AYKP01000000. The G. pannorum whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. AYKR00000000. The version described in this paper is AYKR01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was partly supported with funds from the National Science Foundation (to V.C. and S.C.). Further support came from Owen White, Institute for Genome Sciences (IGS), Baltimore, MD.
We are grateful to Michelle Giglio, Anup Mahurkar, and Owen White of IGS for generous access to the computational infrastructure, and to Joshua Orvis for running the functional annotation pipeline.
Footnotes
Citation Chibucos MC, Crabtree J, Nagaraj S, Chaturvedi S, Chaturvedi V. 2013. Draft genome sequences of human pathogenic fungus Geomyces pannorum sensu lato and bat white nose syndrome pathogen Geomyces (Pseudogymnoascus) destructans. Genome Announc. 1(6):e01045-13. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01045-13.
REFERENCES
- 1. Marshall WA. 1998. Aerial transport of keratinaceous substrate and distribution of the fungus Geomyces pannorum in Antarctic soils. Microb. Ecol. 36:212–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. de Hoog GS, Guarro J, Gené J, Figueras MJ. 2009. Atlas of clinical fungi, 3rd edition (pilot version). CBS/Universitat Rovira i Virgli, Utrecht, the Netherlands [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kochkina GA, Ivanushkina NE, Akimov VN, Gilichinskiĭ DA, Ozerskaia SM. 2007. Halo- and psychrotolerant Geomyces fungi from Arctic cryopegs and marine deposits. Mikrobiologiia 76:39–47 (Article in Russian.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Christen-Zaech S, Patel S, Mancini AJ. 2008. Recurrent cutaneous Geomyces pannorum infection in three brothers with ichthyosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 58:S112–S113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gianni C, Caretta G, Romano C. 2003. Skin infection due to Geomyces pannorum var. pannorum. Mycoses 46:430–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zelenková H. 2006. Geomyces pannorum as a possible causative agent of dermatomycosis and onychomycosis in two patients. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 14:21–25 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Blehert DS, Hicks AC, Behr M, Meteyer CU, Berlowski-Zier BM, Buckles EL, Coleman JT, Darling SR, Gargas A, Niver R, Okoniewski JC, Rudd RJ, Stone WB. 2009. Bat white-nose syndrome: an emerging fungal pathogen? Science 323:227–227.. 10.1126/science.1163874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chaturvedi V, Springer DJ, Behr MJ, Ramani R, Li X, Peck MK, Ren P, Bopp DJ, Wood B, Samsonoff WA, Butchkoski CM, Hicks AC, Stone WB, Rudd RJ, Chaturvedi S. 2010. Morphological and molecular characterizations of psychrophilic fungus Geomyces destructans from New York bats with white nose syndrome (WNS). PLoS One 5:e10783–e10783.. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Minnis AM, Lindner DL. 2013. Phylogenetic evaluation of Geomyces and allies reveals no close relatives of Pseudogymnoascus destructans, comb. nov., in bat hibernacula of eastern North America. Fungal Biol. 117:638–649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Puechmaille SJ, Wibbelt G, Korn V, Fuller H, Forget F, Mühldorfer K, Kurth A, Bogdanowicz W, Borel C, Bosch T, Cherezy T, Drebet M, Görföl T, Haarsma AJ, Herhaus F, Hallart G, Hammer M, Jungmann C, Le Bris Y, Lutsar L, Masing M, Mulkens B, Passior K, Starrach M, Wojtaszewski A, Zöphel U, Teeling EC. 2011. Pan-European distribution of white-nose syndrome fungus (Geomyces destructans) not associated with mass mortality. PLoS One 6:e19167–e19167.. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Marchisio VF, Fusconi A, Rigo S. 1994. Keratinolysis and its morphological expression in hair digestion by airborne fungi. Mycopathologia 127:103–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zimin AV, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Salzberg SL, Yorke JA. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29:2669–2677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Parra G, Bradnam K, Korf I. 2007. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23:1061–1067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. UniProt Consortium 2013. Update on activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D43–D47. 10.1093/nar/gks1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, Boursnell C, Pang N, Forslund K, Ceric G, Clements J, Heger A, Holm L, Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Finn RD. 2012. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D290–D301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O. 2003. The TIGRfams database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:371–373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gene Ontology Consortium, Blake JA, Dolan M, Drabkin H, Hill DP, Li N, Sitnikov D, Bridges S, Burgess S, Buza T, McCarthy F, Peddinti D, Pillai L, Carbon S, Dietze H, Ireland A, Lewis SE, Mungall CJ, Gaudet P, Chrisholm RL, Fey P, Kibbe WA, Basu S, Siegele DA, McIntosh BK, Renfro DP, Zweifel AE, Hu JC, Brown NH, Tweedie S, Alam-Faruque Y, Apweiler R, Auchinchloss A, Axelsen K, Bely B, Blatter M-, Bonilla C, Bouguerleret L, Boutet E, Breuza L, Bridge A, Chan WM, Chavali G, Coudert E, Dimmer E, Estreicher A, Famiglietti L, Feuermann M, Gos A, Gruaz-Gumowski N, et al. . 2013. Gene ontology annotations and resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D530–D535. 10.1093/nar/gks1050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]