Abstract
The objective of the study is to investigate the propagation of Ca2+ waves in full-width cardiac myocytes and carry out sensitivity analysis to study the effects of various physiological parameters on global Ca2+ waves. Based on the anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, a mathematical model was proposed to characterize the Ca2+ waves. The computed results were in agreement with the experimental measurements using confocal microscopy. This model includes variables of current through the Ca2+ release unit (CRU; ICRU), duration of current flow through CRU (Topen), Ca2+ sensitivity parameter (K), the longitudinal and transverse spatial separation of CRUs (lx and ly, where x denotes longitudinal direction (x-axis) and y denotes transverse direction (y-axis)) and Ca2+ diffusion coefficients (Dx, Dy). The spatio-temporal mechanism of the anomalous Ca2+ sparks led to results that were different from those based on Fick's law. The major findings were reported as: ICRU affected the dynamic properties of Ca2+ waves more significantly than Topen; the effect of K on the properties of Ca2+ waves was negligible; ly affected the amplitude significantly, but lx affected the longitudinal velocity significantly; in turn, the limitation and significance of the study are discussed.
Keywords: calcium wave, anomalous subdiffusion, calcium spark, numerical simulation, cardiac myocyte
1. Introduction
The concentration of Ca2+ in the endoplasmic and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) of cardiac myocytes is two to three orders of magnitude higher than that in cytosol. The process involving Ca2+ release from the SR, cytosolic Ca2+ diffusion, reaction of Ca2+ with various Ca2+-binding proteins and resequestration of Ca2+ into the SR is called ‘Ca2+ spark’ [1–3], which results in a Ca2+ transient [1,4,5], localized increase of cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. Although the calcium homeostasis is important for the contraction and relaxation of cardiac muscle, spontaneous Ca2+ sparks can trigger a propagating wave of high Ca2+ concentration in some pathological conditions. This ‘fire–diffuse–fire’ event is called ‘calcium wave’ [6]. Fabiato & Fabiato [7] observed the event of Ca2+ waves in cardiac muscle. The Ca2+ waves were also found in other cell types such as skeletal [8], medaka eggs [9] and astrocytes [10]. Because Ca2+ waves may induce some heart diseases, such as ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular fibrillation and heart failure [11,12], it is of particular importance to understand the mechanism of Ca2+ waves.
The Fick's law models for Ca2+ sparks showed the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of approximately 1.0 μm in comparison with the measured FWHM of approximately 2.0 μm [13–17]. This was called ‘FWHM paradox’. Izu et al. [15] tried to increase the current through the ryanodine receptor (RyR) to obtain larger FWHM, but the spark amplitude also increased (approx. 10 times), which was far beyond the experimental measurements. Kong et al. [18] explained the FWHM paradox experimentally by using microscope blurring. On the other hand, Tan et al. [19–22] developed an anomalous subdiffusion model of Ca2+ sparks to explain FWHM paradox theoretically. Physiologically, the evidence for natural phenomena exhibiting anomalous diffusion had grown so compelling as to prompt punch lines such as ‘anomalous is normal’ [23]. Recently, anomalous diffusion processes in the cytoplasm were observed [24], which supported the anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ in cytoplasm.
A Ca2+ wave is formed by the propagation of Ca2+ sparks such that it may also obey anomalous subdiffusion. The previous mathematical models on Ca2+ waves were, however, based on Fick's law [12,25–28]. Backx et al. [25] presented a model of Ca2+ waves based on the uniform distribution of Ca2+ release sites throughout the cytoplasm. Anisotropic Ca2+ diffusion was studied by Girard et al. [26]. Keizer et al. [27] investigated Ca2+ waves under stochastic firing of Ca2+ release units (CRUs). Izu et al. [28] combined large CRU currents, stochastic firing of CRUs, asymmetric distribution of CRUs and anisotropic Ca2+ diffusion. Lu et al. [12] studied the effect of rogue RyRs on Ca2+ waves in ventricular myocytes with heart failure. By contrast, based on the anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, we have recently proposed a mathematical model for Ca2+ waves and predicted its propagation that agreed with the measurement in local cardiac myocytes [29]. However, the propagation of Ca2+ waves in full-width cardiac myocytes and the effects of various physiological parameters are still unknown.
In this work, based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, we developed a mathematical two-dimensional model for Ca2+ waves in full-width cardiac myocytes. We experimentally and theoretically investigated Ca2+ waves initiating from one transverse row of CRUs near the boundary or at the middle of the full-width cardiac myocytes. Moreover, we carried out sensitivity analysis of various physiological parameters, such as current through the CRU (ICRU), duration of current flow through CRU (Topen), Ca2+ sensitivity parameter (K), spatial separation of CRUs (lx, ly) and Ca2+ diffusion coefficients (Dx, Dy). It was found that the anomalous diffusion mechanism of Ca2+ sparks significantly affects the properties of Ca2+ waves, given the difference between the present model and the Fick's law model.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Experimental methods
In order to record calcium waves in full-width cardiac myocytes, ventricular cardiac myocytes were isolated from adult Sprague–Dawley (rats two to three months old, weight 225–300 g) using standard enzymatic techniques, as described previously [30]. Freshly isolated single cells were stored in Tyrode's solution containing (in millimolar) 135 NaCl, 1 CaCl2, 4 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES and pH 7.4. Before imaging, isolated myocytes were loaded with the dye Fluo-4-AM for 5 min, then washed twice with normal Tyrode's solution. Two-dimensional imaging used a Zeiss LSM-5Live fast confocal microscope equipped with a 40 × 1.3 NA oil immersion objective at a sample rate of 100 frames s−1. The myocytes were excited at 488 nm. All experiments were performed at room temperature (23–25°C).
2.2. Anomalous diffusion model for calcium waves
The size of a normal cardiac myocyte is approximately 15 × 30 × 140 μm. Rapid three-dimensional confocal imaging of calcium waves shows that there is little variation of the wave in the z-direction [31]. Similar to Izu et al. [28], we eliminate the gradients along the z-direction because of the small thickness and establish line sources at the z-direction to simplify the three-dimensional problem to a two-dimensional model of a cardiac myocyte. The regular intervals of CRUs are lx along longitudinal direction (x-axis) and ly along transverse direction (y-axis). The governing equation for Ca2+ waves based on the anomalous subdiffusion model of Ca2+ sparks can be expressed as
| 2.1 |
where [Ca2+] is the free Ca2+ concentration; Dx and Dy are diffusion coefficients, for anisotropic diffusion Dx = 0.30 μm2 ms–1 and Dy = 0.15 μm2 ms–1 [28,32]; Jdye and Jbuffer are fluxes due to Ca2+ fluorescent indicator dye and endogenous stationary buffers; Jpump is pumping rate of SR Ca2+–ATPase and Jleak is a SR leak that balances Jpump. The expressions of Jdye, Jbuffer, Jpump and Jleak are
| 2.2 |
| 2.3 |
| 2.4 |
| 2.5 |
![]() |
2.6 |
![]() |
2.7 |
where n identifies each of the buffer species. [F]T and [Bn]T represent total concentration of the indicator and buffers, respectively. [CaF] and [CaBn] are the concentrations of the Ca2+-bound complexes.
are reaction kinetic parameters. Kpump is the affinity constant for SR pumps, m is the Hill constant and
is the maximum rate. SR leak is used to balance Jpump in the resting state.
JCRU is the flux of Ca2+ release from CRU, the expression of which is the same as that of Izu et al. [28],
| 2.8 |
where σ = 0.64 ICRU/2F is a molar flux of a clustered RyR channel (ICRU is the current through the CRU and F is the Faraday's constant), δ is the Dirac delta function, S is a stochastic function that controls the firing of the CRU, and Topen the firing time. Within a time interval Δt, the probability that the CRU fires is P(C(x, y, t), K, n) · Δt, where P(C(x, y, t), K, n) = Pmax[Ca2+]n/(Kn + [Ca2+]n) with Pmax = 0.3 per CRU ms−1 the maximum probability of Ca2+ spark occurrence, K is the Ca2+ sensitivity parameter and n = 1.6 the Hill coefficient.
The anomalous diffusion model is used in equation (2.1) where
are the Riemann–Liouville operators defined as
| 2.9 |
![]() |
2.10 |
in which k is an integer with β < k < β + 1 (1 < β < 3). 1 < β < 2 refers to anomalous space superdiffusion; β = 2 corresponds to Fick's law; 2 < β < 3 represents anomalous space subdiffusion. According to Tan et al. [19], Ca2+ sparks follow the anomalous subdiffusion of β = 2.25, so this value is also used here, because Ca2+ waves are the propagation of Ca2+ sparks.
2.3. Numerical methods
The simulation is performed on a rectangular region with size of 100 × 20 μm, which is meshed with a uniform grid size of 0.1 × 0.1 μm. The time-step size is 0.005 ms. In order to site a CRU at the middle of the cardiac myocyte (the point (50.0, 10.0)), the position of the CRU at the left corner is sited at the point (2.0, 0.4).
For the fractional differential term, the right-shifted Grünwald formula is used to make a finite difference approximation [33],
![]() |
2.11 |
![]() |
2.12 |
where Nx and Ny are positive integers, and hx = x/Nx, hy = y/Ny. Γ denotes the Gamma function. The shifted Grünwald approximation for fractional order derivative is unconditionally stable [33].
Considering simple impermeability of the cell boundary to the diffusing ions, reflecting boundary conditions ∂C/∂n|boundary = 0 are taken on all edges [12]. The computation time is 500–1000 ms. Therefore, we assume that a CRU will not reopen after firing and closing (a long refractory period), then the effect of the reopened CRUs can be ignored.
Standard values of parameters used in the present study are listed in tables 1 and 2 [13]. ICRU, Topen, Dx, Dy, lx, ly and K are variable parameters whose effects on the results will be discussed. Their default values are Topen = 10 ms, Dx = 0.30 μm2 ms–1, Dy = 0.15 μm2 ms–1, lx = 2.0 μm, ly = 0.8 μm and K = 15 μM. The default value of ICRU will be determined later.
Table 1.
Standard parameter values.
| parameter | value |
|---|---|
| β | 2.25 |
| [Ca2+]∞ | 0.1 μM |
| F | 96 500 C mol–1 |
![]() |
208 μM s–1 |
| Kpump | 0.184 μM |
| m | 3.9 |
| n | 1.6 |
| Pmax | 0.3 per CRU ms–1 |
Table 2.
Standard parameter values for dye and endogenous buffers.
| dye or buffers | k+(μM–1 s–1) | k–(s–1) | [B]T (μM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| dye | 80 | 90 | 50 |
| calmodulin | 100 | 38 | 24 |
| troponin | 39 | 20 | 70 |
| SR | 115 | 100 | 47 |
| SL | 115 | 1000 | 1124 |
3. Results
3.1. Experimental and simulated calcium waves
Because the spatial separation of CRUs along the transverse direction (ly) is shorter than that along the longitudinal direction (lx) in full-width cardiac myocytes, one or more pathological Ca2+ sparks can rapidly trigger the CRUs along the transverse direction. Figure 1 shows that the initial sparks are always located on a transverse line of a cardiac myocyte. Accordingly, simulations only consider the longitudinal propagation (wave velocity) of Ca2+ waves and the amplitudes. The firing of CRUs in a transverse row is chosen to be the initial condition in our simulations to reduce the effects of the transverse propagation and the transverse reflecting boundaries. Here, we will study how large one transverse row of anomalous Ca2+ sparks (also to determine the default value of ICRU) can induce a Ca2+ wave with experimental wave velocity and how the Ca2+ waves propagate from the boundary or the middle of the full-width cardiac myocytes. In addition, collision of full-width Ca2+ waves will also be presented. Because the experimental Ca2+ waves are always spontaneous and stochastic, it is difficult to observe the Ca2+ waves which exactly initiate from the boundaries or the middle of a cardiac myocyte. The initiation of experimental Ca2+ waves is the firing of the CRUs near the boundaries or the middle of a cardiac myocyte.
Figure 1.

Experimental snapshots of a calcium wave initiating from the boundary of a cardiac myocyte. Snapshots are taken 100 ms apart (from 1 to 8). Scale bar, 20 μm. The colour bar denotes the fluorescence value.
3.1.1. Calcium waves initiating from the boundary
Figure 1 shows experimental two-dimensional images of a Ca2+ wave initiating from the boundary of a cardiac myocyte. At the beginning, the CRUs near the left boundary of the cardiac myocyte fire in rapid succession. In a short time, a high Ca2+ concentration region is formed. The transverse propagation of Ca2+ waves in full-width cardiac myocytes cannot be observed (just propagate for a short time), the wavefronts are always a transverse line. From snapshots 1 to 8, the Ca2+ wave propagates from the left boundary to the right boundary with a constant longitudinal velocity of vx = 115 μm s−1, and the amplitudes of each CRUs are also nearly the same. The results are similar to those in previous reports [34,35]. In snapshot 8, the Ca2+ wave reaches the right boundary of the cardiac myocyte.
As shown in figure 2, when ICRU = 4 pA, the firing of CRUs in a transverse row near the boundary can trigger a longitudinal propagating Ca2+ wave. Its longitudinal wave velocity (vx = 120 μm s−1) is in good agreement with the experimental result. Other parameters were taken as their default values (Topen = 10 ms, Dx = 0.30 μm2 ms–1 and Dy = 0.15 μm2 ms–1, lx = 20 μm, ly = 0.8 μm and K = 15 μM). Initial calcium sparks are formed by 10 ms opening of all the CRUs along the transverse line of x = 20 μm. Snapshots are taken at 10, 170, 330, 490, 650 and 810 ms (from 1 to 6). In the three-dimensional images, x-axis and y-axis denote the longitudinal direction and the transverse direction of the cardiac myocyte, respectively, and z-axis denotes the Ca2+ concentration. Through the propagation of the Ca2+ wave, the wavefront nearly maintains a transverse line. However, the stochastic firing of CRUs leads to the peak Ca2+ concentration value in the same transverse row in a short succession. Hence, there are different Ca2+ concentration peaks near the wavefronts. Because the mean waiting time (MWT) before firing of the CRU apart lx through longitudinal direction and its standard deviation (s.d.) is small (16.67 ± 4.88 ms), Ca2+ concentration peaks cannot be observed far away from the wavefronts. Here, the MWT and s.d. are smaller than that based on Fick's law. The physical reason is that the high Ca2+ concentration may stay in a larger region around the firing CRU (for one Ca2+ spark, FWHM is 2.0 μm for subdiffusion and 1.0 μm for Fick's diffusion), the firing probabilities of adjacent CRUs become higher, then the MWT and s.d. becomes smaller, it will be easier for the calcium wave to occur and sustain. The subdiffusive model can reproduce a global Ca2+ wave with the experimental velocity using a reasonable CRU current (4 pA). Fick's law model needs a large CRU current (20 pA) to trigger a normal Ca2+ wave [28]. The CRU current of 20 pA is hard to obtain ([36], figure2c). Therefore, the propagation of Ca2+ waves in whole cardiac myocytes may obey the anomalous subdiffusion mechanism such as the single Ca2+ sparks.
Figure 2.

Computational snapshots of a calcium wave initiating from the boundary of a cardiac myocyte. Initiate calcium sparks are formed by 10 ms opening of all the CRUs along the transverse line of x = 2.0 μm. Snapshots are taken at 10, 170, 330, 490, 650 and 810 ms (from 1 to 6). The colour bar denotes the Ca2+ concentration. (Online version in colour.)
When a transverse row of CRUs fires together initially, the Ca2+ sparks affect each other, then a high Ca2+ concentration band appears. The Ca2+ concentration at the next CRUs through the longitudinal direction increases. Therefore, the initiation of Ca2+ sparks triggered by a transverse row of CRUs needs a smaller ICRU to form a Ca2+ wave with the experimental longitudinal velocity. Four picoamps is chosen to be the default value of ICRU in the following work if not mentioned otherwise. At t = 810 ms, the Ca2+ wave propagates to the right boundary of the cardiac myocyte, which is similar to our experimental result (approx. 800 ms).
Figure 3 shows time courses of Ca2+ concentration in the Ca2+ wave in figure 2. The locations are a (50.0, 10.0), b (50.0, 11.6), c (50.0, 13.2), d (48.0, 10.0) and e (46.0, 10.0). The firing time and the amplitudes of transverse adjacent CRUs at points a, b and c are very close each other. The spatial interval between CRUs at a, d and e is lx. The firing time interval between the CRUs at a and d is 13.92 ms, and that between the CRUs at d and e is 17.60 ms, which are both in the range of MWT and s.d. (16.67 ± 4.88 ms). It is shown that the longitudinal velocity of the propagating Ca2+ wave is almost a constant and all the Ca2+ sparks are almost the same. Moreover, the amplitudes of all the CRUs are close to the average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave (80 μM). It is shown that the amplitude of the propagating Ca2+ wave is also almost a constant.
Figure 3.
Time courses of calcium concentration in the calcium wave from the boundary. The locations of the curves are at a (50.0, 10.0), b (50.0, 11.6), c (50.0, 13.2), d (48.0, 10.0), e (46.0, 10.0) in black solid, red dash, blue dot, green dash dot and magenta short dash dot. (Online version in colour.)
3.1.2. Calcium waves initiating from the middle
It is experimentally and numerically found that Ca2+ waves occur more readily at the boundaries of cardiac myocytes [29,34,37,38]. The physical reason is that the impermeable boundaries of cardiac myocytes can increase the initial local Ca2+ concentration in a small region, then the firing probability of adjacent CRUs will rise. However, the initial conditions in our simulations were firing of all the CRUs in a transverse row. Do the reflecting boundary conditions still affect the longitudinal velocity of Ca2+ waves effectively?
Figure 4 shows experimental images of a Ca2+ wave initiating near the middle of a cardiac myocyte. In snapshot 6, the Ca2+ wave reaches the right boundary, but the left wave keeps on propagating. In snapshot 8, the Ca2+ wave reaches the left boundary. The longitudinal wave velocity is vx = 117 μm s−1 which is close to that of the wave starting from the boundary. As shown in figure 5, when ICRU = 4 pA, the firing of CRUs along the transverse line of x = 50.0 μm can trigger a Ca2+ wave with vx = 118 μm s−1. Snapshots are taken at 10, 90, 170, 250, 330 and 410 ms (from 1 to 6). The average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave is 78 μM. The longitudinal velocity and average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave are only a little smaller than that starting from the boundary. The effect of the reflecting boundaries is very weak, because the initial firing of the transverse CRUs raises the local Ca2+ concentration considerably. Thus, when physiological parameters are determined, the velocities and amplitudes of full-width Ca2+ waves are also determined.
Figure 4.

Experimental snapshots of a calcium wave initiating near the middle of a cardiac myocyte. Snapshots are taken 100 ms apart (from 1 to 8). Scale bar, 20 μm. The colour bar denotes the fluorescence value.
Figure 5.

Computational snapshots of a calcium wave initiating near the middle of a cardiac myocyte. Initiate calcium sparks are formed by 10 ms opening of all the CRUs along the transverse line of x = 50.0 μm. Snapshots are taken at 10, 90, 170, 250, 330 and 410 ms (from 1 to 6). The colour bar denotes the Ca2+ concentration. (Online version in colour.)
3.1.3. Collision of full-width calcium waves
Figure 6 shows collision of two full-width Ca2+ waves. They are triggered initially by 10 ms opening of CRUs along the transverse lines of x = 20 and x = 98.0 μm. The two opposite Ca2+ waves travel at the longitudinal velocities of vx = 115 μm s−1 from x = 2.0 μm and vx = 116 μm s−1 from x = 98.0 μm. The two waves collide at the centreline of x = 50.0 μm at t = 420 ms, and then annihilate, which is consistent with previous experimental results [38–40]. Time courses of Ca2+ concentration at locations a (48.0, 10.0), b (50.0, 10.0) and c (50.0, 11.6) are displayed in figure 7. Because Ca2+ waves become global and fully developed, the amplitude of the combined wave (79 μM) is similar to that of the two waves before collision (78 μM). This is because the local amplitude of a Ca2+ wave is related to the intensity of Ca2+ sparks and the effect of adjacent sparks. There are no differences between the time course or magnitude of the Ca2+ wave during its propagation and at the point of collision.
Figure 6.

Computational snapshots of two full-width calcium waves collision. Snapshots are taken at 10, 250, 390, 410, 420 and 450 ms (from 1 to 6). The colour bar denotes the Ca2+ concentration. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 7.

Time courses of calcium concentration in two full-width calcium waves collision. The locations of the curves are at a (48.0, 10.0), b (50.0, 10.0) and c (50.0, 11.6) in black dot, red dash and blue solid, respectively. (Online version in colour.)
3.2. Physiological parameter sensitivity analysis
Physiological parameter sensitivity analysis of Ca2+ waves based on the Fick's diffusion has been studied by many researchers [26–28]. However, there is no parameter sensitivity analysis of Ca2+ waves based on the anomalous subdiffusion. Here, based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, we perform sensitivity analysis of several parameters to identify the possible determinants of full-width Ca2+ waves. The default values are Topen = 10 ms, Dx = 0.30 μm2 ms–1 and Dy = 0.15 μm2 ms–1, lx = 20 μm, ly = 0.8 μm, K = 15 μM and ICRU = 4 pA. The initial conditions are all the CRUs along the transverse line of x = 2.0 μm open at the time of Topen.
3.2.1. Effect of ICRU
The total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU is determined by the current through CRU (ICRU) and duration of current flow through CRU (Topen). When Topen is invariable, ICRU determines the spatio-temporal property of each Ca2+ spark. Thus, how ICRU affects the properties of Ca2+ waves is very important to the stability of cardiac myocytes.
Figure 8 shows the effect of ICRU on the longitudinal velocity of the Ca2+ wave. ICRU changes from 2 to 5.5 pA. For subdiffusive model, ICRU = 4 pA is a inflection point. When ICRU increases from 2 to 4 pA, the curve is a concave function and its slope increases with ICRU. vx increases rapidly with ICRU near the value of 2 pA, but slowly near the value of 4 pA. When ICRU increases from 4 to 5.5 pA, the curve is a convex function and its slope decreases with ICRU, vx increases rapidly with ICRU again when ICRU is beyond 4 pA. Physiologically, 2 pA is the normal physiological current through CRUs, whereas 4 pA is the release current of a Ca2+ spark [1,36,41,42]. When ICRU takes the normal physiological current through CRUs (2 pA), it can only form a weak Ca2+ wave with vx = 25 μm s−1. The intensity of Ca2+ release per CRU is so small that the longitudinal velocity of the Ca2+ wave is rarely low. ICRU becomes the determinant of vx, so vx increases rapidly with ICRU near 2 pA. Accompanied by the enlargement of the spatial width, the duration of one subdiffusive Ca2+ spark is shortened [19]. When ICRU is near 4 pA, the intensity of Ca2+ release is not so large that the short duration of the subdiffusive spark becomes the most significant effect on the increase of adjacent CRU's firing probabilities. Then, vx increases slowly with ICRU. When the intensity of Ca2+ release is large enough, it connects with the large spatial width of the subdiffusive spark, making vx increase rapidly again. Close to the ICRU value of 4 pA, the variation of vx is nearly robust with ICRU, Ca2+ sparks and Ca2+ waves are relatively stable with the increase of ICRU, which may be the physical reason why 4 pA is always the release current of a Ca2+ spark [1,36,41,42]. However, different from our results, vx is linear with ICRU in Fick's model.
Figure 8.

The effect of ICRU on the longitudinal velocity. Circles, β = 2.25; squares, β = 2.0. (Online version in colour.)
The amplitudes are almost linear for the subdiffusive model and Fick's model. The diffusion model of Ca2+ sparks is not the determinant of the amplitude in Ca2+ waves. The spatio-temporal properties of anomalous sparks do not affect the amplitude directly. The determinant of the amplitude is the total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU (here is ICRU), and the effect is almost linear. When ICRU = 5 pA, the average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave triggered by several sparks is 115 μM, which is close to that of the local Ca2+ wave triggered by one single spark (110 μM [29]). Therefore, based on anomalous diffusion of Ca2+ sparks, initial firing number of CRUs barely affects the average amplitude of Ca2+ waves. However, the longitudinal velocity vx increases obviously with the initial firing number of CRUs. When ICRU = 5 pA, for one transverse row of sparks vx = 160 μm s−1, and for one single spark vx = 96 μm s−1 [29]. The physical reason may be that, the synergistic effect of CRUs induces a large advancement of the firing probability of adjacent CRUs, the wave velocity is larger than that triggered by one single spark. In general, the synergistic effect of CRUs only affects the wave velocity but not the amplitude, and the simple summation of Ca2+ sparks does not exist.
3.2.2. Effect of Topen
Another determinant to the total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU is duration of current flow through CRU (Topen). Thus, Topen directly determines the intensity of a Ca2+ spark, then determines the amplitude of the Ca2+ wave. On the other hand, when Topen is small, the duration of high Ca2+ concentration at the adjacent CRUs is very short, so the firing probability will be low. It may cause the small wave velocity.
We study the propagation of full-width Ca2+ waves with different values of Topen (Topen = 5, Topen = 8 and Topen = 15 ms). When Topen reduces to one half of the standard value Topen = 10 ms, the full duration at half maximum (FDHM), the FWHM and the amplitude of each Ca2+ spark become smaller obviously. The MWT and s.d. for this Ca2+ wave is 128 ± 90 ms. A slow propagating Ca2+ wave is formed, the longitudinal velocity (15.6 μm s−1) and amplitude (30 μM) are both very small. When Topen = 8 ms, the Ca2+ wave is close to the standard one (vx = 75 μm s−1 and amplitude is 65 μM). The Ca2+ wave with a longer duration of sparks (Topen = 15 ms) propagates faster (vx = 160 μm s−1), and its amplitude also rises obviously (126 μM).
Similar to the effect of ICRU, the average amplitude almost linearly increases with Topen. It also shows that the diffusion model of Ca2+ sparks is not the determinant of the amplitude in Ca2+ waves. However, the increase of vx has an obvious inflection point at Topen = 10 ms. The physical reason is that although each subdiffusive spark reaches a wide region, the duration is very short. When Topen becomes smaller, the duration of each spark will be shorter, and the firing probability of adjacent CRUs will be lower, then the longitudinal velocity will be smaller. So near the small value of Topen, the duration of each spark is the determinant of vx. When Topen is close to the normal duration of current flow through CRU (10 ms), the spatial property of the subdiffusive spark determines the increase of vx, and the increase of vx is relatively stable. With a larger Topen, the anomalous diffusion model is not the determinant of vx any more under the restrain function of the other physiological parameters, such as ICRU and lx. Then vx will increase at a slow and stable rate.
3.2.3. Effect of total calcium release
The total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU can be written as ICRU × Topen, which refers to the intensity of each Ca2+ spark. Based on Fick's diffusion of Ca2+ sparks, ICRU × Topen is found to be a strong determinant of wave properties, such as the sharpness of the wavefront [28]. Whether it is also the determinant of wave properties based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks requires further study.
The full-width calcium wave with the parameters of ICRU = 5 pA and Topen = 8 ms is studied. Table 3 shows the longitudinal velocities and the average amplitudes of two cases with the same total calcium release. The values of (ICRU, Topen) are (4, 10) and (5, 8), respectively. vx for (5, 8) is 5% larger than that for (4, 10), and the amplitude for (5, 8) is 14% larger than that for (4, 10). Their longitudinal velocities are very close, but the amplitudes have a little difference. For the morphology of a single Ca2+ spark, the current ICRU denotes the amplitude of the spark, and Topen denotes the duration of the spark. The spatial width of anomalous Ca2+ spark affects the properties of Ca2+ waves significantly. Therefore, the amplitude of one spark affects the amplitude and velocity of the wave more significantly than the duration. (Here, the precondition is that Topen is close to the standard value, if it is too small, then the effect will be more significant.) However, the enlargements of 5% for vx and 14% for amplitude are not notable. It can be confirmed that the total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU ICRU × Topen is the determinant of wave properties based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks.
Table 3.
The longitudinal velocities and the amplitudes of two cases under the same total calcium release.
| (ICRU, Topen) | (4, 10) | (5, 8) |
|---|---|---|
| vx (μm s−1) | 120 | 126 |
| amplitude (μM) | 80 | 91 |
Physiologically, ICRU and Topen are related to release intensity of RyRs. Being a protein, release intensity of RyRs can be controlled by some diseases or by some drugs. Therefore, our results about the sensitivities of ICRU and Topen based on the anomalous subdiffusion may be used to predict the pathological transformation of cardiac myocytes.
3.2.4. Effect of Ca2+ release unit calcium sensitivity
CRU Ca2+ sensitivity parameter K denotes the sensitivity of high Ca2+ concentration to the firing probability of the CRU. Physically, when K becomes smaller, the CRU will be easier to fire under high Ca2+ concentration, then the longitudinal velocity will be larger. Here, based on the anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+, the firing probability of the adjacent CRU is already high. In that case, is the effect of CRU Ca2+ sensitivity on the properties of Ca2+ waves also obvious?
The quantitative analysis of the effect of K on the longitudinal velocities and the amplitudes for both subdiffusive model and Fick's model is performed in figure 9. The result with K = 15 μM is chosen to be the standard value of 1, and the normalized response is showed here. Based on the subdiffusive model, for K = 7.5 μM which reduces to one half of the standard value K = 15 μM, the MWT and s.d. of the Ca2+ wave is 16.13 ± 4.67 ms. The MWT is longer than that of K = 15 μM (16.67 ms), and the s.d. is smaller than that of K = 15 μM (4.88 ms). The firing probability of the adjacent CRU is enlarged. Although the longitudinal velocity decreases with K, the change is not obvious. vx for K = 7.5 μM is only 2.5% larger than that for K = 15 μM. However, for Fick's model, vx decreases with K significantly. vx for K = 7.5 μM is 38% larger than that for K = 15 μM, which agrees with the result performed by Izu et al. [28] (figure 7, curve a). Based on the subdiffusive model, the spatial width of one Ca2+ spark is much larger than that based on Fick's law such that the firing probability of the adjacent CRU is much larger. Under a high firing probability, when K changes, the firing probability will not change obviously.
Figure 9.

The effect of K on the longitudinal velocity and the amplitude. Squares, vx (β = 2.25); circles, amplitude (β = 2.25); upward triangles, vx (β = 2.0); downward triangles, amplitude (β = 2.0). (Online version in colour.)
On the other hand, the average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave barely changes with K. That is to say, the amplitude of the full-width Ca2+ wave is determined by the total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU but not the firing probability of the adjacent CRU.
In some extreme conditions, for example, K decreases to near 0.1 μM or increases to ∞, the firing probability will apparently change. Then, the Ca2+ wave will become so easy to propagate (vx becomes so large) or the Ca2+ wave cannot propagate (the firing probability tends to 0). These conditions can be triggered by some drugs or some diseases.
Physiologically, K can be affected by the Mg2+ concentration, drugs and SR Ca2+ loading [43,44]. According to our results, near the standard value the effect of K on the anomalous subdiffusive wave is very weak. In other words, when the abnormal conditions are not excessive, the cardiac myocytes are relatively stable.
3.2.5. Effect of longitudinal and transverse lattice spacing
All the subdiffusive Ca2+ sparks have almost the same spatial width (FWHM) and temporal duration (FDHM). Intuitively, when the longitudinal or transverse lattice spacing of CRUs becomes smaller, the effect of one spark on adjacent CRUs will be more significant, higher Ca2+ concentrations will reach the adjacent CRUs and increase their firing probabilities. Then, the local velocities of the Ca2+ wave will increase. For the local amplitude of each CRU, the effect of the adjacent sparks will induce a high local Ca2+ concentration and enlarge the local amplitude. The longitudinal lattice spacing of CRUs (lx) affects the longitudinal velocity (vx) directly, and the transverse lattice spacing of CRUs (ly) affects the transverse velocity (vy) directly. Here, we consider only vx. There is a question, does the change of ly affect vx? If yes, is the effect weak or considerable?
The full-width Ca2+ waves with different values of lx and ly are studied, in which (lx = 1.0 μm, ly = 0.8 μm), (lx = 2.0 μm, ly = 0.4 μm) and (lx = 2.0 μm, ly = 1.2 μm). Table 4 presents the effect of (lx, ly) on the longitudinal velocity and average amplitude. The standard vx and amplitude (lx = 2.0 μm, ly = 0.8 μm) are shown for comparison.
Table 4.
The effect of (lx, ly) on the longitudinal velocity and the amplitude.
| (lx, ly) | (1.0, 0.8) | (2.0, 0.8) | (2.0, 0.4) | (2.0, 1.2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vx (μm s−1) | 220 | 120 | 217 | 40 |
| amplitude (μM) | 142 | 80 | 160 | 52 |
When the intervals of CRUs along the longitudinal direction reduce to one half of the standard value lx = 2.0 μm, the longitudinal velocity increases obviously, which becomes almost two times as standard value (vx for lx = 2.0 μm is 120 μm s−1 and for lx = 1.0 μm is 220 μm s−1). The average amplitude also increases obviously (amplitude for lx = 2.0 μm is 80 μM and for lx = 1.0 μm is 142 μM). The enlargement of vx is easy to understand as explained before. The enlargement of average amplitude is due to the FWHM of anomalous sparks (approx. 2.0 μm). When the longitudinal intervals of CRUs reduce to 1.0 μm, the local amplitude of each CRU will be affected by several adjacent sparks, the number of which will be more than the situation of lx = 2.0 μm. Then, the average amplitude of the Ca2+ wave will increase significantly.
When lx = 2.0 μm and ly = 0.4 μm, the longitudinal velocities (vx = 217 μm s−1) are almost the same as that under the condition (lx = 1.0 μm and ly = 0.8 μm). The decrease of ly induces the superposition of more transverse sparks, the Ca2+ concentration at the location of adjacent CRU will be higher, the duration of which will be longer. Then, the firing probability of adjacent CRU will be larger. For the average amplitude, the decrease of ly induces more obvious increase of the amplitude (160 μM for (2.0, 0.4) and 142 μM for (1.0, 0.8)). This conclusion is related to the physiological structure of cardiac myocytes. The transverse lattice spacing of CRUs is physiologically smaller than the longitudinal spacing. When the interval of CRUs is smaller, the effect of adjacent sparks on one site of CRU will be more significantly and then the average amplitude will be much larger.
When ly increases to 1.2 μm, the properties of the Ca2+ wave have obvious change. The connection of transverse CRUs is weakened because of the larger ly, the firing probability of adjacent CRU descends considerably, and vx decreases significantly. On the other hand, owing to the relative independence of each Ca2+ spark, the effect of adjacent sparks on the local amplitude at each site of CRU is very weak. Consequently, the average amplitude also decreases.
Physiologically, if the longitudinal or transverse interval of CRUs becomes smaller owing to some reasons, such as cardiac myocytes deformation, then Ca2+ waves will easily occur with large amplitude, which then causes cardiac myocytes to be unstable. By contrast, if the lattice spacing of CRUs can be enlarged by some method, then we can restrain the propagation of Ca2+ waves and cardiac myocytes will be stable.
3.2.6. Effect of diffusion coefficient
In the above work, the diffusion of Ca2+ is anisotropic. The diffusion coefficient along the x-axis (Dx = 0.30 μm2 ms–1) is two times that along the y-axis (Dy = 0.15 μm2 ms–1). It corresponds to the physiological structure of cardiac myocytes. Under some pathological conditions, such as deformation of the cell or change in protein conformation, the diffusion coefficient may change. Here, we investigate the Ca2+ wave based on the isotropic diffusion of Ca2+.
The full-width Ca2+ wave based on the isotropic diffusion of Ca2+ is studied. The parameters are Dx = 0.25 μm2 ms–1 and Dy = 0.25 μm2 ms–1. Table 5 gives the longitudinal velocities and average amplitudes of the two cases (anisotropic diffusion and isotropic diffusion). The longitudinal velocity decreases with the decrease in the longitudinal diffusion coefficient, whereas the average amplitude increases with the increase in the transverse diffusion coefficient. This conclusion is similar to the effect of longitudinal and transverse lattice spacing. Because the transverse interval of CRUs is small, the increase of Dy enlarges the amplitude significantly. Owing to the large longitudinal interval of CRUs, the decrease of Dx diminishes the firing probability of adjacent CRU considerably. Although the increase of Dy also enlarges vx, the effect is not as obvious as Dx.
Table 5.
The effect of diffusion coefficients on the longitudinal velocity and the amplitude.
| (Dx, Dy) | (0.30, 0.15) | (0.25, 0.25) |
|---|---|---|
| vx (μm s−1) | 120 | 111 |
| amplitude (µM) | 80 | 83 |
4. Conclusion
Propagation of Ca2+ waves initiating from Ca2+ sparks in cardiac myocytes is related to ventricular arrhythmias, fibrillation or heart failure. It is important for our understanding of Ca2+ waves. Here, we carried out experimental and numerical studies to investigate Ca2+ waves in full-width cardiac myocytes. Based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, we proposed a mathematical model for Ca2+ waves. There was an good agreement between the experimental measurements and numerical predictions. It was found that one transverse row of anomalous Ca2+ sparks can trigger a Ca2+ wave with the experimental longitudinal velocity with 4 pA current through the CRU. The 4 pA current is more close to the physiological current than that in the Fick's law model. For the initial transverse row of Ca2+ sparks, the effect of the reflecting boundaries on the properties of full-width Ca2+ waves is very weak. The simulation of full-width Ca2+ waves collision revealed that the simple summation of the waves did not exist at collision. Moreover, we performed sensitivity analysis of physiological parameters for calcium waves in full-width cardiac myocytes.
The total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU can be written as ICRU × Topen, which refers to the intensity of each Ca2+ spark. The determinant of vx is ICRU; vx increases rapidly with ICRU near the value of 2 pA; near the value of 4 pA, vx increases slowly with ICRU owing to the short duration of the subdiffusive spark; vx increases rapidly again with ICRU because of the large spatial width of the spark. On the other hand, the average amplitude is almost linear with ICRU. The variation of vx with Topen has an inflection point at Topen = 10 ms which is also related to the spatio-temporal properties of the subdiffusive sparks, and the average amplitude is almost linear. The total amount of Ca2+ release per CRU ICRU × Topen is the determinant of wave properties based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks.
Based on the anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+, the firing probability of the adjacent CRU is very high. Hence, the effect of CRU calcium sensitivity K on the properties of Ca2+ waves is very weak, which is different from the predictions of the Fick's law model. The longitudinal and transverse lattice spacing of CRUs are both important to Ca2+ waves. The decrease of ly can increase vx considerably, and ly affects the amplitude of Ca2+ wave more significantly than lx owing to the physiological structure of cardiac myocytes. In the same way, the increase of Dy enlarges the amplitude significantly, but the decrease of Dx reduces vx significantly.
This study shows some implications to fibrilation and arrhythmias in cardiac myocytes. Ca2+ wave is related to pathologies such as fibrillation and arrhythmias [45,46]. Ca2+ alternans [47] and delayed after depolarization [48] triggered by Ca2+ waves are potentially arrhythmogenic abnormalities of cardiac Ca2+ signalling. In general, the amplitudes and wave velocities of Ca2+ waves based on the subdiffusive model are larger than those based on the Fick's law model under the same conditions. The abnormal Ca2+ signal caused the abnormal action potential duration and contraction amplitude. Fibrilation and arrhythmias may readily occur. In addition, the amplitudes and wave velocities of Ca2+ waves alter considerably with the variation of ICRU, Topen, lx and ly. This may significantly alter Ca2+ alternans in whole cells, and then induce fibrillation and arrhythmias. By contrast, cardiac myocytes would be relatively stable when K changes.
One limitation of the model is that ICRU and Topen are fixed for all CRUs in a particular simulation. Because the wave properties are sensitive to ICRU and Topen, some calcium waves may terminate after a short propagation owing to the decreases of ICRU and Topen at propagation. We will carry out more experiments and simulations to investigate how the variations of ICRU and Topen at propagation affect calcium waves in future studies.
Based on anomalous subdiffusion of Ca2+ sparks, the effects of physiological parameters qualitatively coincide with that based on Fick's diffusion. However, there exist quantitative differences between the two models. These numerical results need experimental confirmation in further studies before they can be used to predict the pathological mechanism of cardiac myocytes and prevent Ca2+ waves from propagating to the whole cardiac myocyte.
All rat experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the regulation of Research Ethics Committee of State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology, Peking University.
Funding statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11272014), and National Key Basic Research Programme of China (grant no. 2013CB531200).
References
- 1.Cheng H, Lederer WJ, Cannell MB. 1993. Calcium sparks: elementary events underlying excitation–contraction coupling in heart muscle. Science 262, 740–744. ( 10.1126/science.8235594) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cheng H, Lederer MR, Xiao RP, Gomez AM, Zhou YY, Ziman B, Spurgeon H, Lakatta EG, Lederer WJ. 1996. Excitation–contraction coupling in heart: new insights from Ca2+ sparks. Cell Calcium 20, 129–140. ( 10.1016/S0143-4160(96)90102-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cannell MB, Cheng H, Lederer WJ. 1995. The control of calcium release in heart muscle. Cell Calcium 268, 1045–1049. ( 10.1126/science.7754384) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lopez-Lopez JR, Shacklock PS, Balke CW, Wier WG. 1995. Local calcium transients triggered by single l-type calcium channel currents in cardiac cells. Science 268, 1042–1045. ( 10.1126/science.7754383) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fabiato A. 1985. Time and calcium dependence of activation and inactivation of calcium-induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of a skinned canine cardiac Purkinje cell. J. Gen. Physiol. 85, 247–289. ( 10.1085/jgp.85.2.247) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dawson SP, Keizer J, Pearson JE. 1999. Fire–diffuse–fire model of dynamics of intracellular calcium waves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6060–6063. ( 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6060) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fabiato A, Fabiato F. 1972. Excitation–contraction coupling of isolated cardiac fibers with disrupted or closed sarcomeres. calcium dependent cyclic and tonic contractions. Circ. Res. 31, 293–307. ( 10.1161/01.RES.31.3.293) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Endo M, Tanaka M, Ogawa Y. 1970. Calcium induced release of calcium from the sarcoplasmic reticulum of skinned skeletal muscle fibers. Nature 228, 34–36. ( 10.1038/228034a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ridgway EB, Gilkey JC, Jaffe LF. 1977. Free calcium increases explosively in activating medaka eggs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 623–627. ( 10.1073/pnas.74.2.623) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cornell-Bell AH, Finkbeiner SM. 1991. Ca2+ waves in astrocytes. Cell Calcium 12, 185–204. ( 10.1016/0143-4160(91)90020-F) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lakatta EG, Guarnieri T. 1993. Spontaneous myocardial calcium oscillations: are they linked to ventricular fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 44, 73–89. ( 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1993.tb01285.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lu L, Xia L, Ye X, Cheng H. 2010. Simulation of the effect of rogue ryanodine receptors on a calcium wave in ventricular myocytes with heart failure. Phys. Biol. 7, 026005 ( 10.1088/1478-3975/7/2/026005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smith GD, Keizer JE, Stern MD, Lederer WJ, Cheng H. 1998. A simple numerical model of calcium spark formation and detection in cardiac myocytes. Biophys. J. 75, 15–32. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77491-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Izu LT, Wier WG, Balke CW. 1998. Theoretical analysis of the Ca2+ spark amplitude distribution. Biophys. J. 75, 1144–1162. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74034-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Izu LT, Mauban JRH, Balke CW, Wier WG. 2001. Large currents generate cardiac Ca2+ sparks. Biophys. J. 80, 88–102. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75997-8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiang YJ, Klein MG, Schneider MF. 1999. Numerical simulation of Ca2+ ‘sparks’ in skeletal muscle. Biophys. J. 77, 2333–2357. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77072-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fu Y, Zhang GQ, Hao XM, Wu CH, Chai Z, Wang SQ. 2005. Temperature dependence and thermodynamic properties of Ca2+ sparks in rat cardiomyocytes. Biophys. J. 89, 2533–2541. ( 10.1529/biophysj.105.067074) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kong CHT, Laver DR, Cannell MB. 2013. Extraction of sub-microscopic Ca fluxes from blurred and noisy fluorescent indicator images with a detailed model fitting approach. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002931 ( 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002931) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tan W, Fu C, Fu C, Xie W, Cheng H. 2007. An anomalous subdiffusion model for calcium spark in cardiac myocytes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183901 ( 10.1063/1.2805208) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng H, Lederer WJ. 2008. Calcium sparks. Physiol. Rev. 88, 1491–1545. ( 10.1152/physrev.00030.2007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li K, Fu C, Cheng H, Tan W. 2011. Anomalous subdiffusion of calcium spark in cardiac myocytes. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 4, 457–465. ( 10.1007/s12195-011-0174-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Izu LT, Xie Y, Sato D, Bányász T, Chen-Izu Y. 2013. Ca2+ waves in the heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 58, 118–124. ( 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.11.014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sokolov IM, Klafter J. 2006. Field-induced dispersion in subdiffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140602 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.140602) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Munteanu EL, Thon G, Oddershede L, Berg-Sorensen K. 2004. Anomalous diffusion in living yeast cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 078102 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.078102) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Backx PH, Tombe PPD, Deen JHKV, Mulder BJM, ter Keurs HEDJ. 1989. A model of propagating calcium-induced calcium release mediated by calcium diffusion. J. Gen. Physiol. 93, 963–977. ( 10.1085/jgp.93.5.963) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Girard S, Luckhoff A, Lechleiter J, Sneyd J, Clapham D. 1992. Two-dimensional model of calcium waves reproduces the patterns observed in Xenopus oocytes. Biophys. J. 61, 509–517. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81855-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Keizer J, Smith GD. 1998. Spark-to-wave transition: saltatory transmission of calcium waves in cardiac myocytes. Biophys. Chem. 72, 87–100. ( 10.1016/S0301-4622(98)00125-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Izu LT, Wier WG, Balke CW. 2001. Evolution of cardiac calcium waves from stochastic calcium sparks. Biophys. J. 80, 103–120. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75998-X) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen X, Kang J, Fu C, Tan W. 2013. Modeling calcium wave based on anomalous subdiffusion of calcium sparks in cardiac myocytes. PLoS ONE 8, e57093 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0057093) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xu M, et al. 2007. Intermolecular failure of l-type Ca2+ channel and ryanodine receptor signaling in hypertrophy. PLoS Biol. 5, e21 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050021) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ishida H, Genka C, Hirota Y, Nakazawa H, Barry WH. 1999. Formation of planar and spiral Ca2+ waves in isolated cardiac myocytes. Biophys. J. 77, 2114–2122. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77052-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Parker I, Zang WJ, Wier WJ. 1996. Ca2+ sparks involving multiple Ca2+ release sites along z-lines in rat heart cells. J. Physiol. 497, 31–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tadjeran C, Mark MM, Hans-Peter S. 2006. A second-order accurate numerical approximation for the fractional diffusion equation. J. Comput. Phys. 213, 205–213. ( 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.08.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takamatsu K, Wier WG. 1990. Calcium waves in mammalian heart: quantification of origin, magnitude, waveform, and velocity. J. Cell. Biol. 4, 1519–1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lipp P, Niggli E. 1994. Modulation of Ca2+ release in cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes: insight from subcellular release pattern revealed by confocal microscopy. Circ. Res. 74, 979–990. ( 10.1161/01.RES.74.5.979) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang SQ, Stern MD, Rios E, Cheng H. 2004. The quantal nature of Ca2+ sparks and in situ operation of the ryanodine receptor array in cardiac cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3979–3984. ( 10.1073/pnas.0306157101) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.John CC, Lionel FJ, Ellis BR, George TR. 1978. A free calcium wave tranverses the activating egg of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. J. Cell. Biol. 76, 448–466. ( 10.1083/jcb.76.2.448) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cheng H, Lederer MR, Lederer WJ, Cannell MB. 1996. Calcium sparks and [Ca2+]i waves in cardiac myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 39, C148–C159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ishide N, Urayama T, Inoue KI, Komaru T, Takashima T. 1990. Propagation and collision characteristics of calcium waves in rat myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 259, H940–H950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Williams DA, Delbridge LM, Cody SH, Harris PJ, Morgan TO. 1992. Spontaneous and propagated calcium release in isolated cardiac myocytes viewed by confocal microscopy. Am. J. Physiol. 262, C731–C742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Soeller C, Cannell MB. 2002. Estimation of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release flux underlying Ca2+ sparks. Biophys. J. 82, 2396–2414. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75584-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang SQ, Song LS, Lakatta EG, Cheng H. 2001. Ca2+ signalling between single l-type Ca2+ channels and ryanodine receptors in heart cells. Nature 410, 592–596. ( 10.1038/35069083) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rousseau E, Meissner G. 1989. Single cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-release channel: activation by caffeine. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 256, H328–H333. ( 10.1007/BF01870991) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Györke S, Györke I. 1998. Regulation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor channel by luminal Ca2+ involves luminal Ca2+ sensing sites. Biophys. J. 75, 2801–2810. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77723-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lakatta EG. 1992. Functional implications of spontaneous sarcoplasmic reticulum call release in the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 26, 193–214. ( 10.1093/cvr/26.3.193) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Keurs HEDJT, Boyden PA. 2007. Calcium and arrhythmogenesis. Physiol. Res. 87, 457–506. ( 10.1152/physrev.00011.2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kockskamper J, Blatter LA. 2002. Subcellular Ca2+ alternans represents a novel mechanism for the generation of arrhythmogenic Ca2+ waves in cat atrial myocytes. J. Physiol. 545, 65–79. ( 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.025502) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cerrone M, et al. 2007. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in a mouse model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ. Res. 101, 1039–1048. ( 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.148064) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







