Abstract
An efficient method for the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with an electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent has been developed. The reactions proceeded smoothly to give trifluoromethylated alkenes in good to excellent yields. The results provided a versatile approach for the construction of Cvinyl–CF3 bonds without using prefunctionalized substrates.
Keywords: alkenes, catalysis, copper, electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent, trifluoromethylation
Introduction
The incorporation of a trifluoromethyl group into pharmaceutically and agrochemically relevant molecules usually enhances their chemical and metabolic stability, lipophilicity and binding selectivity [1–7]. As a result, considerable effort has been directed towards the development of efficient and versatile trifluoromethylation methods [8–16]. The past few years has witnessed the rapid advances in transition metal-promoted trifluoromethylation for the construction of Caryl–CF3 bonds [17–31]. In contrast, transition metal-mediated trifluoromethylation to form Cvinyl–CF3 bonds has been much less explored. As illustrated in Scheme 1, the strategies developed recently usually require the use of prefunctionalized alkenes, which could be classified into the following: vinylboronic acids, vinyl borates, vinyl halides, vinyl sulfonates and vinyl carboxylic acids (Scheme 1, reaction 1) [32–38]. Cho and co-workers reported a radical process for the trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes without using prefunctionalized substrates, but a volatile reagent was used (Scheme 1, reaction 1) [39]. Szabó described trifluoromethyl-benzoyloxylation of alkynes to construct Cvinyl–CF3 bonds (Scheme 2, reaction 2) [40]. As part of our continuing interest in trifluoromethylation reactions [25,41–45], we investigated the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents (Scheme 1, reaction 3).
Transition metal-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes has been reported by several groups. However, these methods focused on the formation of Csp3–CF3 bonds [46–56]. In copper-catalyzed reactions with electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents, it was proposed that the transformation might proceed via a radical, electrophilic or Heck-type process (Scheme 2) [47–50]. We reasoned that even if the reaction involved the radical process (path A, Scheme 2), the radical intermediate could still be oxidized to a cation because electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents can be considered as an oxidant. In the presence of base, both of the cation and Heck-type intermediates should be able to undergo hydrogen elimination to form a Cvinyl–CF3 bond. On the basis of these reports and our hypothesis, we commenced to examine the reaction of aromatic alkenes with electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents in the presence of copper and base.
Results and Discussion
Previously, we reported that copper powder or cuprous iodide could promote trifluoromethylation of heteroaromatics, arylboronic acids or terminal alkynes with trifluoromethyl sulfonium salt I [25,44–45,57–58]. But the same trifluoromethylation reagent (2 equiv) failed to convert 4-vinylbiphenyl to the expected alkene in reasonable yields in acetonitrile with B1 (DBU) as the base, even though cuprous iodide gave better results (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). In the presence of cuprous iodide, Umemoto’s reagent (II) and Togni’s reagent (III) were found to be more efficient in this transformation (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). 19F NMR measurements showed that the reaction system turned to be complex and low yield of the desired product was determined when another Togni’s reagent (IV) was used (Table 1, entry 5). Other cuprous complexes were also studied with the use of Togni’s reagent (III) (Table 1, entries 6–10). Better result obtained with [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 prompted us to continue to use this copper source (Table 1, entry 10). When B2 was used instead of B1, almost no desired product was observed (Table 1, entry 11). That might be because B2 not only acted as base, but also acted as strongly coordinating ligand, which poisoned the catalyst and shut down the reaction. Other bases (Table 1, entries 12–15), including an inorganic base (Table 1, entry 15), failed to accelerate the desired conversion either. The examination of the solvent effect showed that the solvent is quite important for the reaction (Table 1, entries 16–20). When the reaction was carried out in DMF, the expected product 2a was obtained in excellent yield (Table 1, entry 16). The yield was decreased dramatically in DMSO (Table 1, entry 17). Almost no reaction took place in polar protic solvent (Table 1, entry 18) and moderate results were achieved in less polar solvents (Table 1, entries 19 and 20). With increasing the amount of Togni’s reagent (III) in the suitable solvent, DMF, the product was obtained almost in quantitative yield with excellent stereoselectivity (dr >98:2) determined by 19F NMR (Table 1, entry 21). Decreasing the amount of this reagent resulted in a lower yield (Table 1, entry 22). The absence of catalyst or base led to no reaction or incredibly low yield, which means both of them are crucial for the reaction (Table 1, entries 23–25).
Table 1.
Entry | Cat. | Base | Solvent | “CF3+” | Yield (%)a |
1 | Cu | B1 | CH3CN | I | trace |
2 | CuI | B1 | CH3CN | I | 30 |
3 | CuI | B1 | CH3CN | II | 56 |
4 | CuI | B1 | CH3CN | III | 60 |
5 | CuI | B1 | CH3CN | IV | 30 |
6 | CuBr | B1 | CH3CN | III | 46 |
7 | CuCl | B1 | CH3CN | III | 36 |
8 | CuTc | B1 | CH3CN | III | 54 |
9 | CuOAc | B1 | CH3CN | III | 41 |
10 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | CH3CN | III | 75 |
11 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B2 | CH3CN | III | trace |
12 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B3 | CH3CN | III | 10 |
13 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B4 | CH3CN | III | trace |
14 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B5 | CH3CN | III | 10 |
15 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B6 | CH3CN | III | 7 |
16 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | DMF | III | 90 |
17 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | DMSO | III | 57 |
18 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | CH3OH | III | trace |
19 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | THF | III | 67 |
20 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | CHCl3 | III | 75 |
21b | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | DMF | III | 98 |
22c | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | B1 | DMF | III | 58 |
23 | – | – | DMF | III | 0 |
24 | – | B1 | DMF | III | 0 |
25 | [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 | – | DMF | III | 10 |
aYields determined by 19 F NMR spectroscopy. b2.5 equiv of III was used. c1.5 equiv of III was used.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 21), we then explored the substrate scope of the Cu(I)-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with Togni’s reagent. As shown in Figure 1, the reaction could tolerate various functional groups. It is worth mentioning that all of the products were obtained with excellent stereoselectivity (E/Z >97/3), determined by 19F NMR. Substrates with an electron-donating group were converted smoothly into the desired products in excellent yields (2a–2f). Irrespective of the position of the bromine substituent on the aryl ring, the reaction proceeded very well to afford the desired products in excellent yields (2g–2i). Stronger electron-withdrawing groups showed some negative effect on the reaction, as exemplified by the poor results of substrates with other halides, carbonyl or nitro groups on the benzene ring (2j–2m). Heteroaromatic alkenes were also investigated (2n and 2o). As previously seen, alkene 1n endowed with an electron-rich heteroaromatic group led to a good result (2n) and an electron-deficient substrate resulted in low yield (2o).
With regard to the reaction mechanism, it is reasonable to conceive a pathway involving radical species according to previous reports [47–50]. To gain more insight into the mechanism, further evidence was collected. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), a well-known radical scavenger, was added to the reaction of 4-vinylbiphenyl with Togni’s reagent (III) in the presence of [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6. It was found that the desired trifluoromethylation was completely suppressed, which suggested that the transformation involved a radical process. Based on the above results, we proposed the mechanism as outlined in Scheme 3. Initially, the activation of III by Cu(I) led to the formation of radical intermediate A. Decomposition of this intermediate produces ((2-(2-iodophenyl)propan-2-yl)oxy)copper(II) (C) and a CF3 radical, which is trapped by alkenes to form the trifluoromethylated radical intermediate B. Subsequently, the radical intermediate B is oxidized by Cu(II) (C) to the cation intermediate D with simultaneous release of catalyst Cu(I). In the presence of base, intermediate D readily undergoes hydrogen elimination to give the final product.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have described the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of alkenes with Togni’s reagent under mild conditions. The results presented here provided a versatile approach for the construction of Cvinyl–CF3 bonds without using prefunctionalized substrates. Investigations on the application of the trifluoromethylation method to the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals are currently underway.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21032006, 21172240), the 973 Program of China (No. 2012CBA01200), the Chinese Academy of Sciences for financial support.
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Organo-fluorine chemistry III".
References
- 1.Kirsch P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry Synthesis, Reactivity, Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bégué J-P, Bonnet-Delpon D. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry of Fluorine. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schlosser M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:5432–5446. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Müller K, Faeh C, Diederich F. Science. 2007;317:1881–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.1131943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hagmann W K. J Med Chem. 2008;51:4359–4369. doi: 10.1021/jm800219f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Purser S, Moore P R, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:320–330. doi: 10.1039/b610213c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Furuya T, Kamlet A S, Ritter T. Nature. 2011;473:470–477. doi: 10.1038/nature10108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zheng Y, Ma J-A. Adv Synth Catal. 2010;352:2745–2750. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201000545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nie J, Guo H-C, Cahard D, Ma J-A. Chem Rev. 2010;111:455–529. doi: 10.1021/cr100166a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Parsons A T, Buchwald S L. Nature. 2011;480:184–185. doi: 10.1038/480184a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Studer A. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:8950–8958. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nagib D A, MacMillan D W C. Nature. 2011;480:224–228. doi: 10.1038/nature10647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pham P V, Nagib D A, MacMillan D W C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:6119–6122. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prakash G K S, Jog P V, Batamack P T D, Olah G A. Science. 2012;338:1324–1327. doi: 10.1126/science.1227859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pair E, Monteiro N, Bouyssi D, Baudoin O. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:5346–5349. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang X, Xu Y, Mo F, Ji G, Qiu D, Feng J, Ye Y, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Wang J. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:10330–10333. doi: 10.1021/ja4056239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lundgren R J, Stradiotto M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:9322–9324. doi: 10.1002/anie.201004051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tomashenko O A, Grushin V V. Chem Rev. 2011;111:4475–4521. doi: 10.1021/cr1004293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Besset T, Schneider C, Cahard D. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:5048–5050. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu X-F, Neumann H, Beller M. Chem–Asian J. 2012;7:1744–1754. doi: 10.1002/asia.201200211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oishi M, Kondo H, Amii H. Chem Commun. 2009:1909–1911. doi: 10.1039/b823249k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cho E J, Senecal T D, Kinzel T, Zhang Y, Watson D A, Buchwald S L. Science. 2010;328:1679–1681. doi: 10.1126/science.1190524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Truesdale L, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:3648–3649. doi: 10.1021/ja909522s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chu L, Qing F-L. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:1298–1304. doi: 10.1021/ja209992w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang C-P, Wang Z-L, Chen Q-Y, Zhang C-T, Gu Y-C, Xiao J-C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:1896–1900. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang X-G, Dai H-X, Wasa M, Yu J-Q. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:11948–11951. doi: 10.1021/ja305259n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Herrmann A T, Smith L L, Zakarian A. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6976–6979. doi: 10.1021/ja302552e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu T, Shao X, Wu Y, Shen Q. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:540–543. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ye Y, Sanford M S. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9034–9037. doi: 10.1021/ja301553c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zeng Y, Zhang L, Zhao Y, Ni C, Zhao J, Hu J. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:2955–2958. doi: 10.1021/ja312711c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dai J-J, Fang C, Xiao B, Yi J, Xu J, Liu Z-J, Lu X, Liu L, Fu Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:8436–8439. doi: 10.1021/ja404217t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cho E J, Buchwald S L. Org Lett. 2011;13:6552–6555. doi: 10.1021/ol202885w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hafner A, Bräse S. Adv Synth Catal. 2011;353:3044–3048. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201100528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parsons A T, Senecal T D, Buchwald S L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:2947–2950. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.He Z, Luo T, Hu M, Cao Y, Hu J. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:3944–3947. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yasu Y, Koike T, Akita M. Chem Commun. 2013;49:2037–2039. doi: 10.1039/c3cc39235j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li Z, Cui Z, Liu Z-Q. Org Lett. 2013;15:406–409. doi: 10.1021/ol3034059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li Y, Wu L, Neumann H, Beller M. Chem Commun. 2013;49:2628–2630. doi: 10.1039/c2cc36554e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Iqbal N, Choi S, Kim E, Cho E J. J Org Chem. 2012;77:11383–11387. doi: 10.1021/jo3022346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Janson P G, Ghoneim I, Ilchenko N O, Szabó K J. Org Lett. 2012;14:2882–2885. doi: 10.1021/ol3011419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lin J-H, Xiao J-C. Eur J Org Chem. 2011:4536–4539. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201100683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lin J-H, Zong G, Du R-B, Xiao J-C, Liu S. Chem Commun. 2012;48:7738–7740. doi: 10.1039/c2cc18064b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang C-P, Wang Z-L, Chen Q-Y, Zhang C-T, Gu Y-C, Xiao J-C. Chem Commun. 2011;47:6632–6634. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11765c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang C-P, Cai J, Zhou C-B, Wang X-P, Zheng X, Gu Y-C, Xiao J-C. Chem Commun. 2011;47:9516–9518. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13460d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang X, Lin J, Zhang C, Xiao J, Zheng X. Chin J Chem. 2013;31:915–920. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201300393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mu X, Wu T, Wang H-Y, Guo Y-L, Liu G. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:878–881. doi: 10.1021/ja210614y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Parsons A T, Buchwald S L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:9120–9123. doi: 10.1002/anie.201104053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang X, Ye Y, Zhang S, Feng J, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Wang J. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16410–16413. doi: 10.1021/ja207775a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu J, Fu Y, Luo D-F, Jiang Y-Y, Xiao B, Liu Z-J, Gong T-J, Liu L. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15300–15303. doi: 10.1021/ja206330m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhu R, Buchwald S L. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:12462–12465. doi: 10.1021/ja305840g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miyake Y, Ota S-I, Nishibayashi Y. Chem–Eur J. 2012;18:13255–13258. doi: 10.1002/chem.201202853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yasu Y, Koike T, Akita M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:9567–9571. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Egami H, Shimizu R, Kawamura S, Sodeoka M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:4000–4003. doi: 10.1002/anie.201210250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu X, Xiong F, Huang X, Xu L, Li P, Wu X. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:6962–6966. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wu X, Chu L, Qing F-L. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2013;52:2198–2202. doi: 10.1002/anie.201208971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mizuta S, Verhoog S, Engle K M, Khotavivattana T, O’Duill M, Wheelhouse K, Rassias G, Médebielle M, Gouverneur V. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:2505–2508. doi: 10.1021/ja401022x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang J-J, Kirchmeier R L, Shreeve J M. J Org Chem. 1998;63:2656–2660. doi: 10.1021/jo972213l. See for some references on S-tifluoromethyl sulfonium salt. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Magnier E, Blazejewski J-C, Tordeux M, Wakselman C. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:1279–1282. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503776. See for some references on S-tifluoromethyl sulfonium salt. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.