Skip to main content
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry logoLink to Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry
. 2013 Nov 7;9:2387–2394. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.9.275

A one-pot synthesis of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines from trifluoromethyl aldoxime

Raoni S B Gonçalves 1, Michael Dos Santos 1, Guillaume Bernadat 1, Danièle Bonnet-Delpon 1, Benoit Crousse 1,
Editor: David O'Hagan
PMCID: PMC3869255  PMID: 24367404

Abstract

Functionalized 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines and 3-trifluoromethylisoxazoles were easily prepared from trifluoromethyl aldoxime 2 under mild conditions by using DIB as oxidant. Theoretical studies of the reactivity of trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4 toward olefins and alkynes were carried out. The 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines were ring-opened with NaBH4 and NiCl2 to yield the corresponding trifluoromethylated γ-amino alcohols.

Keywords: aldoxime, amino alcohol, fluorine, isoxazole, isoxazoline, organo-fluorine

Introduction

2-Isoxazolines are five-membered heterocyclic compounds that have been widely applied in medicinal and organic chemistry. This nucleus is frequently found in natural products [14], bioactive molecules [56] (Figure 1) and can be used as bioisosteric transformations of amide bonds in order to provide metabolically stable and more active derivatives [711]. Moreover, 2-isoxazolines can be cleaved under various conditions to supply a variety of organic functionalities including γ-amino alcohols [12], β-amino acids [13], β-hydroxy ketones [1415] and β-hydroxy nitriles [1415].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Example of bioactive molecules bearing the 2-isoxazoline nucleus.

Fluorinated compounds play a central role in different branches of chemistry [16]. The incorporation of a fluorine atom into bioactive molecules causes remarkable changes of their physicochemical properties, which allows the development of substances with improved pharmacological characteristics. Some examples are the synthesis of modified amino acids and peptides, carbohydrates, natural products and the development of more selective enzyme inhibitors [1721]. Another powerful area, yet a somewhat less utilised role for fluorine is as a tag for 19F NMR that offers several analytical advantages including speed, sensitivity and selectivity [2223]. Fluorinated molecules have served as valuable 19F NMR probes in high-throughput screening, drug metabolism and protein binding experiments as well as in assessing gene expression [24].

Nevertheless, the preparation of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines 1 has not been extensively studied so far. In the literature only a few examples of the preparation of these derivatives through a multistep procedure are described (Scheme 1) [25]. Initially, trifluoromethyl aldoxime 2 is halogenated to give a volatile trifluoroacetohydroxymoyl chloride or bromide 3, which is usually isolated in low yields. Reaction of intermediate 3 with a base provides trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4, which can be reacted with olefins (such as styrene, allyl derivatives, etc.) through a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition to give the desired product. Therefore, the development of a straightforward and mild general procedure to access these valuable derivatives remains of great importance. In the present work, we describe a simple and efficient metal-free protocol for the oxidation of trifluoromethyl aldoxime 2 into trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4 and a one-pot synthesis of 1 through in situ cyclization of 4 with different dipolarophiles (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines.

Results and Discussion

Initially, another procedure for the preparation of the trifluoroacetaldehyde oxime 2 was developed. In a previous work [25], 2 was obtained as an etherate complex from the reaction between 2,2,2-trifluoroethane-1,1-diol (TFAL) and hydroxylamine hydrochloride. In our work, reaction of TFAL and an aqueous solution of hydroxylamine (50 wt %) yielded the desired product, which was isolated as a complex of two molecules of aldoxime with one molecule of water after distillation in 70–80% yield (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of aldoxime 2.

In the recent literature, different conditions have been developed for the direct oxidation of aldoximes [2631]. Recently, commercially available reagents have been employed under metal-free conditions. A group [27] reported that the hypervalent iodine reagents (diacetoxyiodo)benzene (DIB) and phenyliodine bis(trifluoroacetate) (PIFA) could successfully promote the oxidation of aldoximes to the corresponding nitrile oxide. Those reagents exhibit potent oxidizing properties, comparable to heavy-metal reagents, but with several advantages such as low toxicity, high availability and the possibility to be utilized under mild conditions [32]. Then, we decided to verify their applicability in the oxidation of 2 despite the presence of water. We first screened different oxidative reagents and conditions for the oxidation step and allylbenzene (5a) was chosen as dipolarophile. Our studies for this process are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Effect of different conditions on the reaction between trifluoromethyl aldoxime 2 and allylbenzene (5a).

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-09-2387-i001.jpg

entry reaction conditions time isolated yield (%)

1 DIB, TEA, MeOH 2 h complex mixture
2 DIB, HFIP 2 h complex mixture
3 DIB, CH2Cl2 overnight 55
4 PIFA, CH2Cl2 overnight 16

When DIB was used with triethylamine (TEA) and methanol as solvent, the formation of a complex mixture was observed (Table 1, entry 1). This is probably due to the nucleophilic addition of methanol to the highly electrophilic trifluoroacetonitrile oxide. The utilization of the less nucleophilic alcohol hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) [3334] led to the formation of a complex mixture (Table 1, entry 2). The oxidation of 2 with PIFA in CH2Cl2 afforded the product in only 16% yield (Table 1, entry 4). Better results were obtained by employing DIB in CH2Cl2 as solvent, after which the product could be isolated in an acceptable yield (55%, Table 1, entry 3). [Bis(acetoxy)iodo]benzene (DIB) is a weaker oxidant than PIFA. When the oxidation is carried out with DIB, weak acetic acid instead of strong trifluoroacetic acid is liberated, and the decomposition of the oxazolines is avoided.

Faced with the moderate yield of 1a, we followed the reaction by using 19F NMR. The measurement of the crude mixture with 19F NMR revealed the presence of a side product and despite the total consumption of the aldoxime, a small amount of allylbenzene remained. It is known that nitrile oxides can dimerize or isomerize to yield different products, such as furoxans, isocyanates, 1,2,4-oxadiazoles and 1,4,2,5-dioxadiazines (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dimerization and isomerization products from nitrile oxides.

We thus postulated that a competition between the cycloaddition reaction and the dimerization or isomerization pathways could occur. Aiming to confirm our hypothesis we carried out the reaction without the presence of allylbenzene. After 12 h, 2 was completely consumed with the exclusive formation of the previously observed side product. However, attempts to isolate this product failed due to its high volatility. It was therefore co-distilled with CH2Cl2 and the resulted solution was analyzed by 19F NMR coupled and decoupled with proton, 19F,19F-COSY and 19F,19F-NOESY (see Supporting Information File 1). Data confirmed the formation of bis(trifluoromethyl)furoxan 6 (Figure 3) already synthesized by Middleton [35].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Dimerization of 4 yielding bis(trifluoromethyl)furoxan 6.

Considering that the best results were reached utilizing DIB and CH2Cl2 as solvent, these conditions were selected for further optimizations. After several investigations, we could verify that employing two equivalents of aldoxime 2 and two equivalents of DIB led to complete conversion of the starting olefin. The product could be isolated in good yield (76%, see below in Table 2, entry 1). We can note here that water complexed with 2 did not alter the reaction rate.

Table 2.

Synthesis of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines and isoxazoles by reaction between aldoxime 2 and olefins or alkynes in the presence of DIB.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-09-2387-i002.jpg

entry substrate product isolated yield (%)

1 Inline graphic
5a
Inline graphic
1a
76
2 Inline graphic
5b
Inline graphic
1b
90
3 Inline graphic
5c
Inline graphic
1c
91
4 Inline graphic
5d
Inline graphic
1d
64
5 Inline graphic
5e
Inline graphic
1e
51
6 Inline graphic
5f
Inline graphic
1f
56
7 Inline graphic
5g
Inline graphic
1g
82
8 Inline graphic
5h
Inline graphic
1h
74
9 Inline graphic
5i
Inline graphic
1i
24
10 Inline graphic
5j
Inline graphic
1j
20
11 Inline graphic
5k
Inline graphic
1k
traces
12 Inline graphic
5l
Inline graphic
1l
53
13 Inline graphic
5m
Inline graphic
1m
50
14 Inline graphic
5n
Inline graphic
1n
traces

Having optimized reagents and conditions, the scope of the reaction was explored with regard to the substrates (Table 2). As observed in the earliest works [11], the cycloaddition of 4 with terminal olefins led to the corresponding 3-trifluoromethyl-5-substituted-2-isoxazoline 1 with complete regioselectivity. No trace of the regioisomer 3-trifluoromethyl-4-substituted-2-isoxazoline could be detected even when yields of cycloadducts were low. From functionalized olefins such as NH–Cbz and NH–Boc allylamines the desired product could be isolated in excellent yields (90% and 91%, respectively, Table 2, entries 2 and 3). Interestingly, the protecting groups were not cleaved, which indicated that reaction conditions are very mild. With allyltrimethylsilane oxazoline 1g was obtained in good yield (82%). From ester and acid derivatives of undecen, isoxazolines were obtained in good yields too (64% and 51%, respectively, Table 2, entries 4 and 5). With para-bromostyrene isoxazoline 1f was obtained in 56% yield. On the other hand, a good yield was reached for disubstituted olefin 5h (Table 2, entry 8). However a complete lack of reactivity was observed for the reaction with the electron-poor olefins 5i, 5j and 5k (Table 2, entries 9–11). The reaction was also carried out with alkynes, providing 3-trifluoromethyl-5-substituted-isoxazoles. Moderate yields were obtained for the reaction with phenylacetylene (5l) and trimethylsilylacetylene (5m, Table 2, entries 12 and 13). However, the electron poor alkyne 5n was unreactive towards trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4.

1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition reactions have been studied from the theoretical standpoint since the 1970’s onwards [3637] with an ever-increasing accuracy as computational methods evolved [38]. Assuming that the above-mentioned transformations occur via a concerted mechanism, we decided to perform electronic structure calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G* level in order to further understand the reactivity of the different unsaturated compounds studied in this work against trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4 (See Supporting Information File 1) [3943]. Upon energy minimization, a structure with a geometry close to linearity was found for trifluoroacetonitrile oxide (Figure 4), which is consistent with earlier findings [44].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Depiction of the geometry (left column) and isodensity surface of the reacting frontier molecular orbitals (FMO) at 50% probability (right column) of trifluoroacetonitrile oxide 4 (top row) and protected aminoalkene 5c (bottom row) calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level.

Comparison of the energy gaps between the frontier molecular orbital levels of the nitrile oxide and those of the alkene partners (Figure 5) suggest that type-III cycloaddition reactions (where the dipole reacts via its LUMO and the dipolarophile via its HOMO) take place for every combination of reactants reported herein [45].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

FMO energy levels of dipole 4 and dipolarophiles 5a and 5k calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G* level. Continuous and dotted lines indicate the favored (ΔE = 5.407 eV for 5a and 6.673 eV for 5k) and the disfavored (ΔE = 8.178 eV for 5a and 7.955 eV for 5k) molecular orbital interactions, respectively.

In this scenario, with the same dipole, the reactivity is expected to increase with the HOMO energy level of the dipolarophile. A simple scatter plot of yield versus the latter variable confirms and illustrates this trend (Figure 6), which can be interpreted the following way: when the gap between the LUMO energy level of the nitrile oxide and the HOMO energy level of the alkene becomes too high (relatively to 7.139 eV, which is the energy difference for the self-cycloaddition process), the dimerization pathway is favored and the yield of isoxazole drops.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Yields of the cycloaddition reaction plotted against the HOMO energy levels of the dipolarophile partner among 5ac,fn.

With only a single regioisomer being isolated, we also considered the coefficients (Table 3) and shapes (Figure 4) of frontier molecular orbitals. This data is compatible with the observed regioselectivity [37]. Steric factors can also exert notable influence, but they would guide regioselectivity in the same direction.

Table 3.

FMO coefficients of the 1,3-dipole 4 and representative dipolarophiles (atomic orbital is indicated in parentheses).

coefficients

reactant Ca Cb

5c 0.180 (2py) 0.133 (2px)
5g 0.321 (2pz) 0.246 (2pz)
4a 0.434 (2py) 0.299 (2py)

aColumns Ca and Cb contain coefficients for C and O.

In a subsequent step, we decided to preliminarily study the ring opening reaction of the 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines in order to prepare the corresponding trifluoromethylated γ-amino alcohols. The major and almost the only route to synthesize these amino alcohols is the reduction of β-aminocarbonyl compounds prepared from Mannich-type reactions [4648]. The ring opening of 2-methyl-3-trifluoromethylisoxazolines by utilizing H2 and Raney-Ni as catalysts was described by Tanaka and co-workers [49]. However, this methodology is restricted to the synthesis of N-methylated amino alcohols. Instead we investigated the reduction and the ring opening of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines 1a and 1b in the presence of NaBH4 and NiCl2 as additives [50]. Under these conditions, a total conversion of the starting material was observed by 19F NMR, and products 7a and 7b were obtained in moderate yields. However the diastereoisomeric excess was very poor (10% de). The results are reported in Table 4.

Table 4.

Ring opening reaction of 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines 1a and 1b.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-09-2387-i031.jpg

entry substrate product isolated yield (%) dr

1 Inline graphic
1a
Inline graphic
7a
50 40:60
2 Inline graphic
1b
Inline graphic
7b
52 40:60

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have developed a simple, mild and efficient one-step procedure for the synthesis of functionalized 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines and 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazoles from trifluoromethyl aldoxime 2 by utilizing DIB as oxidant. The applicability of the 3-trifluoromethyl-2-isoxazolines to supply different fluorinated building blocks was demonstrated by the easy ring opening of these intermediates with NaBH4 and NiCl2, yielding the corresponding trifluoromethylated γ-amino alcohol.

Supporting Information

File 1

General methods, synthetic procedure, spectroscopic data, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 19F NMR of compounds of 2, 1a-1j, 1l-1n, 7a, 7b, 6 and computational results.

Acknowledgments

R.S.B.G thanks the FAPERJ, CNPq, the Marie Curie program, the Farmaguinhos/FioCruz, and PGQu for financial support. Central Glass Co. Ltd. is gratefully acknowledged for kindly providing fluoral hydrate and HFIP, as well as the IT department from Université Paris-Sud for providing computing resources. The authors would like thank M’bokeno Gomes Lowa, Erasmus student. We also thank the French Fluorine Network (GIS Fluor).

This article is part of the Thematic Series "Organo-fluorine chemistry III".

References

  • 1.Feuer H, editor. Nitrile oxides, nitrones, and nitronates in organic synthesis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cicchi S, Cordero F M, Giomi D. Five-membered ring systems: With O&N atoms. In: Gribble G W, Joule J A, editors. Progress in Heterocyclic Chemistry. Vol. 15. Oxford: Pergamon; 2003. pp. 261–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Namboothiri I N N, Rastogi N. Isoxazolines from Nitro Compounds: Synthesis and Applications. In: Gupta R R, Hassner A, editors. Synthesis of Heterocycles via Cycloadditions I. Vol. 12. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 1–44. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Savage G P. Curr Org Chem. 2010;14:1478–1499. doi: 10.2174/138527210791616812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.El Sayed K A, Bartyzel P, Shen X, Perry T L, Zjawiony J K, Hamann M T. Tetrahedron. 2000;56:949–953. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(99)01093-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Proksch P, Putz A, Ortlepp S, Kjer J, Bayer M. Phytochem Rev. 2010;9:475–489. doi: 10.1007/s11101-010-9178-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Castellano S, Kuck D, Viviano M, Yoo J, López-Vallejo F, Conti P, Tamborini L, Pinto A, Medina-Franco J L, Sbardella G. J Med Chem. 2011;54:7663–7677. doi: 10.1021/jm2010404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dallanoce C, Frigerio F, Martelli G, Grazioso G, Matera C, Pomè D Y, Pucci L, Clementi F, Gotti C, De Amici M. Bioorg Med Chem. 2010;18:4498–4508. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.04.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cheng J-F, Huang Y, Penuliar R, Nishimoto M, Liu L, Arrhenius T, Yang G, O'Leary E, Barbosa M, Barr R, et al. J Med Chem. 2006;49:4055–4058. doi: 10.1021/jm0605029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Benltifa M, Hayes J M, Vidal S, Gueyrard D, Goekjian P G, Praly J-P, Kizilis G, Tiraidis C, Alexacou K-M, Chrysina E D, et al. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:7368–7380. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2009.08.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rakesh, Sun D, Lee R B, Tangallapally R P, Lee R E. Eur J Med Chem. 2009;44:460–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tangallapally R P, Sun D, Rakesh, Budha N, Lee R E B, Lenaerts A J, Meibohm B, Lee R E. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:6638–6642. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.09.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tang S, He J, Sun Y, He L, She X. J Org Chem. 2010;75:1961–1966. doi: 10.1021/jo1000065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang D, Chen Y. J Org Chem. 2008;73:9181–9183. doi: 10.1021/jo801831c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Maimone T J, Shi J, Ashida S, Baran P S. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17066–17067. doi: 10.1021/ja908194b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chambers R D. Fluorine in Organic Chemistry. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O'Hagan D. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:308–319. doi: 10.1039/b711844a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bégué J-P, Bonnet-Delpon D. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry of Fluorine. Hoboken: Wiley; 2008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uneyama K. Organofluorine Chemistry. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kirsch P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley; 2004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Banks R E, Smart B E, Tatlow J C. Organofluorine Chemistry, Principles and Commercial Applications. New York: Plenum; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Woods J R, Mo H, Bieberich A A, Alavanja T, Colby D A. J Med Chem. 2011;54:7934–7941. doi: 10.1021/jm201114t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jordan J B, Poppe L, Xia X, Cheng A C, Sun Y, Michelsen K, Eastwood H, Schnier P D, Nixey T, Zhong W. J Med Chem. 2012;55:678–687. doi: 10.1021/jm201441k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dalvit C. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2007;51:243–271. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tanaka K, Masuda H, Mitsuhashi K. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1984;57:2184–2187. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.57.2184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoshimura A, Zhu C, Middleton K R, Todora A D, Kastern B J, Maskaev A V, Zhdankin V V. Chem Commun. 2013;49:4800–4802. doi: 10.1039/c3cc41164h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mendelsohn B A, Lee S, Kim S, Teyssier F, Aulakh V S, Ciufolini M A. Org Lett. 2009;11:1539–1542. doi: 10.1021/ol900194v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shing T K M, Wong W F, Cheng H M, Kwok W S, So K H. Org Lett. 2007;9:753–756. doi: 10.1021/ol062873p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Singh V, Hutait S, Biswas S, Batra S. Eur J Org Chem. 2010:531–539. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200901166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pinto A, Conti P, Grazioso G, Tamborini L, Madsen U, Nielsen B, De Micheli C. Eur J Med Chem. 2011;46:787–793. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Minakata S, Okumura S, Nagamachi T, Takeda Y. Org Lett. 2011;13:2966–2969. doi: 10.1021/ol2010616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhdankin V V, Stang P J. Chem Rev. 2008;108:5299–5358. doi: 10.1021/cr800332c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bégué J-P, Bonnet-Delpon D, Crousse B. Synlett. 2004:18–29. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44973. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shuklov I A, Dubrovina N V, Börner A. Synthesis. 2007:2925–2943. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-983902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Middleton W J. J Org Chem. 1984;49:919–922. doi: 10.1021/jo00179a031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Houk K N, Sims J, Duke R E, Strozier R W, George J K. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:7287–7301. doi: 10.1021/ja00803a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Houk K N, Sims J, Watts C R, Luskus L J. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:7301–7315. doi: 10.1021/ja00803a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lan Y, Zou L, Cao Y, Houk K N. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:13906–13920. doi: 10.1021/jp207563h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kohn W, Sham L J. Phys Rev. 1965;140:A1133–A1138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hohenberg P, Kohn W. Phys Rev. 1964;136:B864–B871. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Becke A D. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5648–5652. doi: 10.1063/1.464913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee C, Yang W, Parr R G. Phys Rev B. 1988;37:785–789. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hehre W J, Radom L, Schleyer P V R, et al. Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory. New York: Wiley; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Havasi B, Pasinszki T, Westwood N P C. J Phys Chem A. 2005;109:3864–3874. doi: 10.1021/jp040725f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sustmann R. Pure Appl Chem. 1974;40:569–593. doi: 10.1351/pac197440040569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Michaut V, Metz F, Paris J-M, Plaquevent J-C. J Fluorine Chem. 2007;128:889–895. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2007.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sukach V A, Golovach N M, Pirozhenko V V, Rusanov E B, Vovk M V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2008;19:761–764. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2008.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huguenot F, Brigaud T. J Org Chem. 2006;71:2159–2162. doi: 10.1021/jo052323p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tanaka K, Sugimoto Y, Okafuji Y, Tachikawa M, Mitsuhashi K. J Heterocycl Chem. 1989;26:381–385. doi: 10.1002/jhet.5570260221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nonn M, Kiss L, Sillanpää R, Fülöp F. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2012;8:100–106. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.8.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File 1

General methods, synthetic procedure, spectroscopic data, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and 19F NMR of compounds of 2, 1a-1j, 1l-1n, 7a, 7b, 6 and computational results.


Articles from Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Beilstein-Institut

RESOURCES