Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Dalton Trans. 2014 Jan 7;43(1):119–131. doi: 10.1039/c3dt51940f

H6phospa-Trastuzumab: Bifunctional Methylenephosphonate-based Chelator with 89Zr, 111In and 177Lu

Eric W Price a,b, Brian M Zeglis c, Jason S Lewis c,, Michael J Adam b,, Chris Orvig a,
PMCID: PMC3872121  NIHMSID: NIHMS530682  PMID: 24104523

Abstract

The acyclic chelator H6phospa and the bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa have been synthesized using nosyl protection chemistry and evaluated with 89Zr, 111In, and 177Lu. The p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa derivative was successfully conjugated to trastuzumab with isotopic dilution assays indicating 3.3 ± 0.1 chelates per antibody and in vitro cellular binding assays indicating an immunoreactivity value of 97.9 ± 2.6%. Radiolabeling of the H6phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate was achieved with 111In in 70–90% yields at room temperature in 30 minutes, while 177Lu under the same conditions produced more inconsistent yields of 40–80%. Stability experiments in human serum revealed the 111In-phospa-trastuzumab complex to be 52.0 ± 5.3% intact after 5 days at 37 °C, while the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab to be only 2.0 ± 0.3% intact. Small animal SPECT/CT imaging using mice bearing subcutaneous SKOV-3 ovarian cancer xenografts was performed, and it was found that 111In-phospa-trastuzumab successfully identified and delineated small (~2 mm in diameter) tumors from surrounding tissues, despite visible uptake in the kidneys and bone due to moderate chelate instability. As predicted from stability assays in serum, the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab conjugate served as a negative control and displayed no tumor uptake, with high uptake in bones indicating rapid and complete radiometal dissociation and suggesting a potential application of H6phospa in transient lanthanide chelation for bone-delivery. Radiolabeling with 89Zr was attempted, but even with elevated temperatures of 37 °C, the maximum observed radiometal incorporation over 18 hours was 12%. It can be concluded from this work that H6phospa is not superior to the previously studied H4octapa for use with 111In and 177Lu, but improvements in 89Zr radiolabeling were observed over H4octapa, suggesting H6phospa to be an excellent starting point for elaboration of 89Zr-based radiopharmaceutical development. To our knowledge, H6phospa is the best desferrioxamine alternative for 89Zr radiolabeling to be studied to date.

Introduction

Recent years have witnessed a surge in interest in the development and application of 89Zr-based radiopharmaceuticals for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.112 A large part of this attention can be attributed to the intermediate half-life (t1/2 = ~3.3 days) of 89Zr, a property that makes the isotope nearly ideal for use with biological vectors that have long circulation times, such as antibodies and nanoparticles.16, 13 Very few isotopes combine the nuclear properties of an intermediate half-life (2–7 days) with a suitable positron emission for PET imaging, making 89Zr uniquely situated amongst its radiometal peers.4 To date, the only chelator proven competent enough for use with 89Zr is the acyclic hydroxamate-based desferrioxamine (DFO), which can quantitatively radiolabel with 89Zr in less than one hour at room temperature; most chelators, it is important to note, cannot adequately complex 89Zr under any conditions in aqueous media.1, 2, 6, 13 DTPA is currently the best alternative chelator to DFO for 89Zr radiolabeling, but can only achieve radiolabeling yields of < 0.1% after 1 hour at room temperature.14 Despite the excellent radiolabeling properties and sufficient in vitro and in vivo stability of DFO, over prolonged periods of time, some 89Zr can be observed to decomplex, leach out of the DFO chelate, and ultimately accumulate in the skeletal system.1, 2, 6, 13 Because of this mild shortcoming of DFO, the goal of discovering a new chelator that can quickly and completely radiolabel 89Zr under mild conditions, while concomitantly improving on the thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness of DFO would be of great interest and utility towards the translation of 89Zr from the bench to the clinic. Due to the propensity of Zr(IV) to quickly precipitate, aggregate, and form polynuclear oxo/hydroxo species at typical radiolabeling pHs (2–8), an acyclic chelator with very rapid radiolabeling kinetics is required.2 Additionally, due to the ideal pairing of 89Zr with heat-sensitive antibodies, the room-temperature radiolabeling properties that most acyclic chelators provide are likewise crucial.

Extending the focus to more common radiometals, 111In and 177Lu are two widely used radiometals that, unlike 89Zr, have been employed for decades in both the laboratory and clinic.15, 16 These two isotopes are most effectively used as an imaging/therapy pair, with 111In typically used for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging (t1/2 ~2.8 days) and pre-therapy dosimetry calculations, and 177Lu typically used for therapy (t1/2 ~6.6 days). Although chelators such as DOTA, CHX-A’’-DTPA, and most recently H4octapa have been found to be effective for use with 111In and 177Lu, new and highly stable acyclic chelators with rapid room temperature radiolabeling kinetics and a variety of physical properties (e.g. charge, denticity, donor atoms) are always of interest.1722

A number of recent works have illustrated that the use of methylenephosphonate groups in chelators can provide improved radiolabeling properties with a variety of radiometals, most notably accelerated reaction kinetics that allow for faster and lower temperature radiolabel incorporation.2330 In particular, the replacement of carboxylic acid groups with methylenephosphonates has yielded both improved reaction kinetics, and enhanced chelate stability. Most notable is the example of CB-TE2A, in which the replacement of one (CB-TE1A1P) or both (CB-TE2P) carboxylic acid arms with methylenephosphonate groups resulted in improved radiolabeling kinetics, with in vitro and in vivo stability being retained or enhanced compared to the CB-TE2A parent chelator.2328 The use of methylenephosphonate groups with our existing “pa” family of acyclic chelators (Chart 1), such as H2dedpa, H4octapa, H2azapa, and H5decapa is enticing, as it could potentially provide improved radiochemical properties.17, 3133

Chart 1.

Chart 1

The current “gold standard” chelators for 111In/177Lu (DOTA, as well as CHX-A’’-DTPA and the recently published and promising H4octapa), DFO, previously published members of the “pa” family, and the new entrant H6phospa.

The idea of improving radiolabeling kinetics by replacing carboxylic acid chelating arms with methylenephosphonate groups led us to the synthesis of H6phospa (Chart 1). H6phospa is a methylenephosphonate derivative of the previously published acyclic chelator H4octapa, with 8 potential donor arms in an N4O4 set (octadentate).17 Previous attempts to radiolabel the H4octapa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate with 89Zr in a variety of buffers (including HEPES, ammonium acetate, phosphate buffered saline) resulted in no radiometal incorporation as evaluated by radio-iTLC (unpublished data). It was hypothesized that replacement of the acetic acid arms of H4octapa with methylenephosphonate arms might improve radiochemical yields and reaction kinetics. Fortuitously, the methylenephosphonate derivative of H4octapa had been previously published by Rodriguez-Blas and co-workers, and so the synthesis of the octadentate chelator H6L2 (which we have now called H6phospa) was performed using a modified literature procedure in 1 step from the Me2dedpa precursor,34, 35 and the new and unpublished bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa was synthesized in 6 steps. Subsequently, p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa was conjugated to the antibody trastuzumab, and radiolabeling experiments were performed with 89Zr, 111In, and 177Lu, in order to assess the potential of H6phospa-based conjugates for application with these three radiometals for molecular imaging agents (SPECT/PET) and therapeutics.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization

An important modification of our literature procedure was used to synthesize the acyclic chelator H6phospa.17, 3436 The precursor Me2dedpa (1) was synthesized according to our previous work in 3 steps utilizing unique 2-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (nosyl) protection chemistry in a cumulative yield of 70–75% (Scheme 1).36 Purification of the Me2dedpa precursor was performed using neutral alumina, due to the high affinity of this molecule to silica. To afford H6phospa, a one-pot procedure was used. Me2dedpa and phosphorous acid were first refluxed together in HCl (6 M) for a short period of time (~1 h), followed by the slow addition of paraformaldehyde to form a transient imine, which could then react with phosphorous acid to yield the methylenephosphonate product. If the paraformaldehyde reagent were added first or added too quickly, the N-methylated product would form as a major product, which would greatly reduce yields and complicate purification. The product H6phospa (2) formed an insoluble HCl salt after reducing the crude reaction mixture to dryness in vacuo, resuspending in HCl (6 M), and filtering.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of H6phospa (2) and p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa (10), (i) paraformaldehyde (12 eq.), phosphorous acid (20 eq.), HCl (5 mL, 6 M), reflux, 48 h, 70%; (ii) THF, NaHCO3, 2-nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride (2.2 equiv), RT, 24 h, 74%; (iii) DMF, Na2CO3, methyl-6-bromomethylpicolinate (2.2 equiv), 60 °C, 48 h, 95%; (iv) THF, thiophenol (2.2 equiv), K2CO3, RT, 72 h, 90%; (v) paraformaldehyde (16 eq.), phosphorous acid (40 eq.), HCl (5 mL, 6 M), reflux, 48 h, 42%; (vi) 3 mL of (1:1) glacial acetic acid:3 M HCl, Pd/C (20 wt%), H2 (g) balloon, RT, 1 h, used without further purification (vii) thiophosgene in DCM (15 equiv), HCl (2 mL, 3M), RT, 24 h, 14% over steps vi-vii.

Nosyl protection chemistry was crucial for the synthesis of p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa, as it allowed for deprotection under mild conditions (no strong acid/base or hydrogenation) with thiophenol and potassium carbonate in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature. The use of benzyl protection chemistry was not feasible for this synthesis, as deprotection would require hydrogenation (Scheme 1, step iv) that would transform the p-nitrobenzyl functionality to p-aniline. The aniline primary amine would then react (Scheme 1, step v) with paraformaldehyde and phosphorous acid creating unwanted N-methyl/methylenephosphonate products, and prevent later isothiocyanate formation. The bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa (10) was synthesized for the first time in 6 steps with a low cumulative yield of ~4%. Briefly, the isothiocyanate precursor p-NO2-Bn-H6phospa (9) was synthesized through an analogous pathway to H6phospa, with the p-NO2-Bn-Me2dedpa precursor made first, followed by a very similar methylenephosphonate formation in HCl (6 M) with paraformaldehyde and phosphorous acid. The p-NO2-Bn-H6phospa product was purified via semi-preparative reverse-phase (RP) HPLC, hydrogenated to form p-NH2-Bn-H6phospa, and finally reacted with thiophosgene in chloroform and HCl (3 M) to yield p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa (10), which was lyophilized after RP-HPLC purification to yield an off-white powder.

Once synthesized, H6phospa was reacted with ZrCl4, In(ClO4)3, and LuCl3 in three attempts to make non-radioactive metal complexes. The In3+ complex was identified by low-resolution and high-resolution mass spectrometry, but was too insoluble to perform other characterization techniques, and no crystals were obtained for X-ray solid-state structure determination. The Lu3+ complex was also very insoluble, could not be detected by mass spectrometry, and, like the In3+ complex, could not be characterized by other techniques (for example, they were not soluble in MeOD, D2O or DMSO-d6 for NMR spectroscopic analysis). The Zr4+ complex also could not be detected by mass spectrometry or characterized by other techniques, though it was observed that a fine white precipitate formed shortly after addition of the zirconium salt to an aqueous solution of H6phospa. Although synthesis of these metal complexes was attempted, none could be confirmed. Radiolabeling experiments (vida infra) with 111In and 177Lu have confirmed that coordination of these metal ions does indeed occur, while radiolabeling experiments with 89Zr have demonstrated that the H6phospa complex of this metal forms inefficiently in low yields.

Antibody Modification, 111In and 177Lu Radiolabeling, and In Vitro Characterization

Moving beyond radiolabeling efficiency and chemical characterization, the in vitro and in vivo stability of a chelator will determine its ultimate value for use in radiopharmaceuticals. To this end, a model system based on the HER2/neu-targeting antibody trastuzumab and HER2-expressing SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells was used. After modification of the purified trastuzumab with p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa and subsequent radiolabeling experiments, the resulting radioimmunconjugates were characterized by radio-iTLC, radiometric isotopic dilution assays, cellular binding assays, serum stability challenges, and in vivo SPECT/CT imaging using female nude athymic mice bearing subcutaneous SKOV-3 xenografts (Table 1).

Table 1.

Chemical and in vitro biological characterization data for 111In- and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab radioimmunoconjugates.

Immunoconjugate Isotope Radiolabeling
conditions and yield
Chelates
/ mAba
Specific activity
(mCi/mg)
Immunoreactive
fraction (%)b
Serum stability
120 h (%)c
H6phospa-trastuzumab 111In 30 min, 25 °C, 70–90% 3.3 ±0.1 2.9 ±0.7 97.9 ± 2.6 52.0 ± 5.3
177 Lu 30 min, 25 °C, 40–80% 3.3 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.8 n/a 2.0 ± 0.3
a

Isotopic dilution assays, n = 3.

b

Determined immediately prior to in vivo experimentation, n = 9.

c

Calculated in human serum at 37 °C for 120 h, n = 3.

The bifunctional chelate derivative p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa was conjugated to purified trastuzumab via incubation under mildly basic conditions (pH 8.5–9.0) with 4 equivalents of p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa, and the resulting conjugates were purified via size exclusion chromatography (PD-10, GE Healthcare). Subsequent radiometric isotopic dilution experiments revealed that 3.3 ± 0.1 accessible chelates per antibody had been successfully conjugated (Table 1). H6phospa-trastuzumab was then radiolabeled with either 111In or 177Lu in NH4OAc buffer (pH 5.5, 200 mM) for 30 min at room temperature, producing 111In-labeled radioimmunoconjugates with acceptable yields (70–90% radiochemical yield) and high specific activities (2.9 ± 0.7 mCi/mg) (Table 1). Radiolabeling experiments with 177Lu resulted in inconsistent yields (40–80% radiochemical yield) but high specific activities (2.8 ± 0.8 mCi/mg). The radiochemical purity of 111In-phospa-trastuzumab was excellent after purification (>99%), but iTLC evaluation of 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab showed impurities that eluted at the solvent front, even after purification. This was most likely a result of weakly-bound 177Lu undergoing ligand exchange between the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate and EDTA4− (50 mM, pH 5) in the aqueous mobile phase (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A) iTLC radiochromatograph of the unpurified radiolabeling mixture of 111In-phospa-trastuzumab (30 minutes, 25 °C, 2.64 mCi/mg); B) iTLC of 111In-phospa-trastuzumab after purification by PD-10 column; C) iTLC trace of the unpurified radiolabeling mixture of 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab (30 minutes, 25 °C, 2.23 mCi/mg); and D) iTLC trace of 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab after purification, showing 177Lu transchelated from the weakly-bound 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab to EDTA4− (~200 µg of antibody conjugate used for each reaction).

The 111In-phospa-trastuzumab conjugate was produced quickly under mild room temperature conditions, but radiolabeling properties of H6phospa are admittedly inferior to H4octapa with both 111In and 177Lu (H4octapa providing quantitative RCY in < 15 min at RT). However, in vitro assays with HER2-expressing SKOV-3 cancer cells designed to calculate the immunoreactive fraction of an antibody at infinite antigen levels revealed an immunoreactivty of 97.9 ± 2.6% for 111In-phospa-trastuzumab (n=9, Table 1). This represents a negligible decrease from the theoretical maximum of 100% assumed for unmodified trastuzumab. Cellular immunoreactivity assays were not performed with 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab due to limited stability. The stabilities of the 111In/177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab radioimmunoconjugates were assessed using a human serum transchelation challenge at 37 °C over a period of 5 days (gentle agitation, 300 rpm, Eppendorf Thermomixer) (Table 1). The amount of radiometal that remained bound to the H6phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate was determined using radio-iTLC. 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab proved to be very unstable, for the 177Lu was quickly transchelated by serum proteins (e.g. transferrin), with only 8% of the 177Lu remaining chelate-bound after 24 hours and only 2% still intact after 5 days (Figure 2). The 111In-phospa-trastuzumab construct fared better, with 67% of the 111In remaining intact after 24 hours and 53% after 5 days. Included for comparison in Figure 2 are previously obtained human serum stability data of the H4octapa-based constructs 111In/177Lu-octapa-trastuzumab, both of which quantitatively and rapidly radiolabeled at room temperature in less than 15 minutes, remained > 90% intact throughout an entire 5 day transchelation challenge, and demonstrated excellent in vivo stability.36

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The stability of 177Lu/111In-phospa-trastuzumab in human blood serum over 120 h, agitated at 300 rpm and 37 °C, analyzed via radio-iTLC elution with EDTA mobile phase (50 mM, pH 5), compared to previously obtained values for 177Lu/111In-octapa-trastuzumab as a reference.36

89Zr Radiolabeling

DFO has been used as the chelator of choice for 89Zr for over 20 years.2 During this time, no challengers have emerged that improve upon it, or, for that matter, display comparable radiochemical properties.2 The challenges faced when trying to improve upon DFO are significant, and these difficulties are only amplified by the problematic aqueous chemistry of 89Zr.2 Although the previously published acyclic chelator H4octapa has been shown to have great potential for use with the radiometals 111In and 177Lu, unpublished experiments have revealed its incompetence for radiolabeling with 89Zr. Using a variety of buffers (NH4OAc, HEPES, PBS, pH 5.5–7.4) and temperatures (RT to 90 °C) no measureable quantity of 89Zr could be incorporated into the H4octapa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate. Our hypothesis from these observations was that by using methylenephosphonate donor arms in place of the carboxylic acid arms in H4octapa, we could potentially enhance radiolabeling kinetics and improve radiometal-complex stability with 89Zr. From these observations, we modified the design of H4octapa by taking advantage of its inherent modularity and replaced its pendant acetic acid chelating arms with methylenephosphonate groups to synthesize H6phospa.

Radiolabeling experiments with the H6phospa-trastuzumab construct have proven our original hypothesis correct in a rather anticlimactic way, with the methylenephosphonate groups providing increased 89Zr incorporation up to a maximum yield of 12% (3.3 ± 0.1 chelates per antibody, PBS pH 7.4, 37 °C, 18 hr) (Figure 3). Under the more realistic radiolabeling conditions typically used for 89Zr-DFO - RT, pH 7.0–7.5, 1 hr - radiochemical yields of 7–8% were achieved (Figure S11–12).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Radiolabeling results of H6phospa-trastuzumab with 89Zr in phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4), showing results at both room temperature and 37 °C with H6phospa-trastuzumab (3.3 ± 0.1 chelates per antibody), revealing poor radiometal incorporation of < 12% even after 18 hours (~300 µg of antibody conjugate used for each reaction and ~1 mCi of 89Zr).

Despite the improved 89Zr radiolabeling yields of H6phospa-trastuzumab (8–12%) compared to H4octapa-trastuzumab (~0%), it was not sufficient for H6phospa to be used as a chelator for 89Zr-based radiopharmaceutical preparations. Although PBS buffer is commonly used for 89Zr radiolabeling, HEPEs buffer is a good alternative.3, 13, 3739 89Zr Radiolabeling experiments with H6phospa-trastuzumab in HEPEs buffer (500 mM, pH 7.1) were attempted, but after 1 hour at room temperature, radiochemical yields of only ~2% were achieved. These results compare poorly to the current “gold standard” chelator desferrioxamine (DFO, Chart 1), which can achieve quantitative radiochemical yields (>95%) at room temperature in less than 1 hour. It is important to note that although H6phospa has been found to be inferior to DFO, to our knowledge it is the best alternative chelator to be investigated to date. Previously, the best alternative chelator to DFO was DTPA, with a DTPA-antibody conjugate of Zevalin demonstrating 89Zr radiochemical yields of < 0.1% after 1 hour at room temperature.14

Although the hypothesis that replacing the carboxylic acid pendant arms of H4octapa with the methylenephosphonate arms of H6phospa would improve radiolabeling kinetics and radiochemical yields was proven correct, the improvement was modest. However, these results do provide compelling evidence that methylenephosphonate-O donor groups may be superior to traditional carboxylate-O donor groups for 89Zr coordination. The N4O4 donor set of the picolinate-based chelators H4octapa and H6phospa may be too nitrogen rich, and future chelators should take advantage of the oxophilic nature of Zr(IV). Taking a lesson from the only suitable 89Zr chelator, DFO (Chart 1), acylic chelators with O8 donor sets and binding groups such as hydroxamates, carboxylates, carbonyls, catechols, and hydroxypyridinones are likely most suitable. This valuable insight suggests that H6phospa is a good starting point for further design modifications towards new 89Zr chelators.

Small Animal SPECT/CT Imaging

Despite the modest radiolabeling performance of H6phospa-trastuzumab with 89Zr and the non-optimal radiochemical yields and serum stability results with 111In and 177Lu, in vivo imaging was performed to determine the biological behavior of these radio-immunoconjugates. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was used in conjunction with standard helical X-ray CT for in vivo imaging of the 111In and 177Lu radiolabeled H6phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugates over a 5-day period. The poor in vitro serum stability of 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab foretold poor in vivo stability; however, our laboratory has had a long-standing interest in the delivery of therapeutic doses of lanthanide ions to bone for the treatment of osteoporosis.40, 41 Towards this goal, SPECT/CT imaging was performed with the purified 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate in order to visualize biodistribution and confirm bone-localization of 177Lu for the potential application of H6phospa to transiently bind lanthanides for bone-delivery.40, 41

111In-phospa-trastuzumab SPECT/CT images showed significant tumor uptake 24 hours post injection (p.i.), with residual activity remaining in blood circulation, as is typical for antibody constructs. Unlike highly stable 111In and 177Lu radiometal chelates like DOTA (and most recently, H4octapa), some instability and radiometal dissociation can be visualized by moderate uptake in the kidneys and bones/joints (Figure 4). Despite these shortcomings, the SKOV-3 tumors were the most prominent tissue in the SPECT images. As expected from the poor stability results in serum, images of the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab construct showed complete decomplexation of the radiometal after 24 hours, with free 177Lu metal ions accumulating almost entirely in the bone (e.g. joints, spine, Figure 5). At 72 hours p.i. the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab images looked nearly identical to 24 hours p.i., with no residual activity remaining in blood circulation and no tumor uptake apparent. The 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab images also serve as negative control experiments, demonstrating the effects of poor chelate stability in vivo. Since antibody vectors like trastuzumab have very long biological half-lives, persistent blood uptake is generally a positive sign of stability; not surprisingly, this was not observed for 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab (Figure 4 vs Figure 5). An interesting aspect of the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab SPECT/CT images (Figure 5) is the lack of uptake in the endoreticular system (e.g. liver, spleen) and lungs, with radioactivity almost entirely localizing in the skeletal system. This suggests that there may be a silver lining for H6phospa with respect to 177Lu, as its failure as a stable chelate for immunoconjugates may be salvaged by its utility in delivering 177Lu to bone.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SPECT/CT images of 111In-phospa-trastuzumab in female nude athymic mice bearing SKOV-3 tumor xenografts in the right shoulder (diameter ~2 mm), imaged at 24, 72, and 120 hrs p.i., showing significant tumor uptake as well as some uptake in the bone (knee joints and shoulders) and kidneys (outline is visible upon magnification) due to chelate instability (~800–810 µCi injected activity, ~150–200 µg antibody per mouse).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

SPECT/CT images of 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab in female nude athymic mice bearing SKOV-3 tumor xenografts in the right shoulder (diameter ~2 mm), imaged at 24 and 72 hrs p.i., showing negligible tumor uptake and primarily bone uptake at all time points (~575 µCi injected activity, ~150–200 µg antibody per mouse).

Conclusions

The acyclic chelator H6phospa and the bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa have been synthesized using unique 2-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (nosyl) protection chemistry, conjugated to trastuzumab (3.3 ± 0.1 chelates per antibody), and evaluated via radiolabeling with 89Zr, 111In, and 177Lu. Radiolabeling of the H6phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate was achieved with 111In in 70–90% yields at room temperature in 30 minutes (2.9 ± 0.7 mCi/mg), and with 177Lu under the same conditions in yields of 40–80% (2.8 ± 0.8 mCi/mg). Human serum stability experiments revealed that the 111In-phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate was 52.0 ± 5.3% intact after 5 days, and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab was only 2.0 ± 0.3% intact. The room temperature radiolabeling conditions afforded by H6phospa produced the 111In-phospa-trastuzumab conjugate with high immunoreactivity (97.9 ± 2.6%, as indicated by cellular binding assays). Small animal SPECT/CT imaging was performed using nude athymic mice bearing subcutaneous SKOV-3 xenografts, and it was found that 111In-phospa-trastuzumab successfully identified and delineated small (~2 mm in diameter) tumors from surrounding tissues; however, some uptake was observed in the kidneys and bone due to moderate chelate instability. The in vivo behavior of the 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate was likewise studied via SPECT/CT, and, as expected from its poor in vitro stability in serum, it displayed no tumor uptake and high uptake in the bones and joints, suggesting complete radiometal dissociation. The weak binding of 177Lu by H6phospa-trastusumab and the rapid in vivo release of 177Lu radiometal ions highlights a potential application of H6phospa in transient lanthanide chelation for delivery of therapeutic doses to the bone. The radiolabeling efficiency of H6phospa-trastuzumab was tested with 89Zr, and while H6phospa offered an improvement over H4octapa-trastuzumab, the results were modest with 7–8% incorporation of 89Zr after 1 hour at room temperature. DTPA was previously the best alternative chelator to DFO, providing 89Zr-radiolabeling yields of < 0.1% after 1 hour at room temperature. To our knowledge, H6phospa now provides the second highest 89Zr radiolabeling yields reported to date, with DFO being superior. It can be concluded from this work that H6phospa is a less suitable chelator for use with 111In and 177Lu when compared to DOTA and H4octapa, but an improvement for 89Zr radiolabeling. Radiolabeling yields were inferior to the current “gold standard” desferrioxamine (DFO), but valuable insight was gained for the design of new 89Zr chelators, with H6phospa being an excellent starting point.

Experimental

General Remarks

All solvents and reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; TCI America, Portland, OR; Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and were used as received unless otherwise indicated. DMSO used for chelator stock solutions was of molecular biology grade (>99.9%: Sigma, D8418). Methyl-6-bromomethylpicolinate was synthesized according to a literature protocol.17 Water used was ultra-pure (18.2 MΩ cm−1 at 25 °C, Milli-Q, Millipore, Billerica, MA). The analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates were aluminum-backed ultrapure silica gel (Siliaplate™, 60 Å pore size, 250 µM plate thickness, Silicycle, Quebec, QC). Flash column silica gel was provided by Silicycle (Siliaflash® Irregular Silica Gels F60, 60 Å pore size, 40–63 mm particle size, Silicycle, Quebec, QC). Automated column chromatography was performed using a Teledyne Isco (Lincoln, NE) CombiFlash® Rf automated system with solid load cartridges packed with flash column silica gel and RediSep Rf Gold® reusable normal-phase silica columns and neutral alumina columns (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AV300, AV400, or AV600 instruments; all spectra were internally referenced to residual solvent peaks except for 13C NMR spectra in D2O, which were externally referenced to a sample of CH3OH/D2O, and 31P NMR spectra in D2O, which were externally referenced to 85% phosphoric acid. Low-resolution mass spectrometry was performed using a Waters liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (LC-MS) consisting of a Waters ZQ quadrupole spectrometer equipped with an ESCI electrospray/ chemical ionization ion source and a Waters 2695 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA). High-resolution electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (EI-MS) was performed on a Waters Micromass LCT time of flight instrument. Microanalyses for C, H, and N were performed on a Carlo Erba EA 1108 elemental analyzer. The HPLC system used for purification of non-radioactive compounds consisted of a semi-preparative reverse phase C18 Phenomenex synergi hydro-RP (80 Å pore size, 250 × 21.2 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) column connected to a Waters 600 controller, a Waters 2487 dual wavelength absorbance detector, and a Waters delta 600 pump. UV/vis measurements for determining antibody stock solution concentrations were taken on a Thermo Scientific nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Wilmington, DE).

111In was cyclotron produced (Advanced Cyclotron Systems, Model TR30) by proton bombardment through the reactions 111Cd(p,n)111In and was provided by Nordion as 111InCl3 solutions in 0.05 M HCl. 177Lu was procured from Perkin Elmer (Perkin Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Wellesley, MA, effective specific activity of 29.27 Ci/mg) as 177LuCl3 in 0.05 M HCl. 89Zr was produced at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center on an EBCO TR19/9 variable-beam energy cyclotron (Ebco Industries Inc., British Columbia, Canada) via the 89Y(p,n)89Zr reaction and purified in accordance with previously reported methods to yield 89Zr with a specific activity of 5.28–13.43 mCi/µg (195–497 MBq/µg).39 Labeling reactions were monitored using silica-gel impregnated glass-microfiber instant thin layer chromatography paper (iTLC-SG, Varian, Lake Forest, CA) and analyzed on a Bioscan AR-2000 radio-TLC plate reader using Winscan Radio-TLC software (Bioscan Inc., Washington, DC). All radiolabeling chemistry was performed with ultrapure water (>18.2 MΩ cm−1 at 25 °C, Milli-Q, Millipore, Billerica, MA) that had been passed through a 10 cm column of Chelex resin (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Human blood serum (Sigma, Sera, human, aseptically filled, S7023-100 mL) competition solutions were agitated at 300 rpm and held at 37 °C using an Eppendorf Thermomixer and then analyzed by iTLC using an EDTA mobile phase (50 mM, pH 5). 177Lu/111In/89Zr-immunoconugates were analyzed using iTLC as described above, and purified using PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare, United Kingdom, MW < 5000 Da filter) that were conditioned by elution of 25 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before use, and Corning 50k MW Amicon® Ultra centrifugation filters. Radioactivity in samples was measured using a Capintec CRC-15R dose calibrator (Capintec, Ramsey, NJ), and a Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA) Automated Wizard Gamma Counter was used for creating calibration curves. SPECT/CT imaging was performed using a four-headed NanoSPECT/CT®PLUS camera (Bioscan Inc., Washington DC, USA) with a multi-pinhole focused collimator and a temperature controlled animal bed (Minerve Equipment Veterinaire). The human breast cancer cell line SKOV-3 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and grown by serial passage. Animals used were female nude athymic mice.

N,N′-[6-(Methoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl]methyl-1,2-diaminoethane (1)

Compound 1 was prepared according to a previously published method in 3 steps (70–75% cumulative yield).36 1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOD, 25 °C) δ: 8.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.94 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 6H), 2.79 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, MeOD, 25 °C) δ: 167.0, 161.4, 148.5, 139.5, 127.6, 124.8, 54.9, 53.4, 50.0, 49.3. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C18H22N4O4+H]+: 359.1719; found: 359.1720, [M+H]+, PPM = 0.2.

N,N′-(Methylphosphonate)-N,N′-[6-(methoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl]methyl]-1,2-diaminoethane (2), H6phospa

Compound 2 was prepared according to a modified literature procedure.34, 35 To a solution of 1 (74.0 mg, 0.207 mmol) in HCl (5 mL, 6 M) was added phosphorous acid (340 mg, 4.13 mmol), followed by paraformaldehyde in small portions (25.0 mg, 0.827 mmol). The reaction mixture was refluxed overnight, and over a period of 48 hours another 8 equiv of paraformaldehyde was added (50.0 mg, 1.65 mmol). The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to form the water-insoluble HCl salt, which was washed with cold HCl (3 M) ad libitum to yield H6phospa (2) as a white solid (70%) (Figures S1–S4). 1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O, 25 °C) δ: 7.68 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.36 (m, 2H), 4.12 (s, 4H), 3.32 (s, 4H), 2.96 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 4H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, D2O, 25 °C, externally referenced to MeOH in D2O) δ: 172.1, 153.0, 152.8, 125.8, 123.4, 58.9, 58.8, 52.7, 50.9, 50.4, 50.3. 31P[1H] NMR (121.5 MHz, D2O, 25 °C, externally referenced to 85% phosphoric acid) 16.0, 2.8. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C18H22N4O10P2+H]+: 517.0889; found: 517.0884, [M+H]+, PPM = −1.0. IR (neat, ATR-IR): ν= 1624 cm−1 (C=O), 1584 cm−1 (C=C py), 1430 cm−1 (P=O).

[Lu(phospa)]3− (3). H6phospa (2)

Metal complex synthesis was attempted, but not confirmed. (14.1 mg, 0.027 mmol) was suspended in 0.1 M HCl (0.5 mL), and LuCl3·6H2O (15 mg, 0.033 mmol) was added. The pH was adjusted to 4–5 using 0.1 M NaOH and then the solution was stirred at room temperature. After 1 hour, the reaction mixture was analysed by mass spectrometry, but no product could be identified. After reducing to a white solid in vacuo, the product could not be dissolved in MeOD, D2O, or DMSO-d6, and thus characterization was not performed, and metal complex formation could not be confirmed.

[In(phospa)]3− (4). H6phospa (2)

Metal complex synthesis was attempted, but not confirmed. (16.1 mg, 0.031 mmol) was suspended in 0.1 M HCl (0.5 mL), and In(ClO4)3·6H2O (20 mg, 0.037 mmol) was added. The pH was adjusted to 4–5 using 0.1 M NaOH, and then the solution was stirred at room temperature. After 1 hour, analysis of the reaction mixture via low-resolution and high-resolution mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of a species consistent with the molecular formula proposed for the indium complex. Similar to the [Lu(phospa)]3− complex, after reducing to dryness in vacuo, the white solid could not be dissolved, and therefore further characterization was not obtained, and no crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C18H21InN4O10P2 – H]: 628.9693; found: 628.9700 [M – H], PPM = 1.1.

1-(p-Nitrobenzyl)ethylenediamine (5)

Compound 5 was prepared according to a literature preparation,42 and was purified with a modified procedure using column chromatography (CombiFlash Rf automated column system; 40 g HP silica;, A: 95% dichloromethane 5% ammonium hydroxide, B: 95% methanol 5% ammonium hydroxide, 100% A to 30% B gradient) to afford a 7 as brown/amber oil in a cumulative yield of 40% over 3 steps. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 7.91 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.18 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 2.80-2.57 (m, 3H), 2.45-2.31 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 147.1, 147.7, 129.4, 122.8, 54.3, 47.5, 41.4. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C9H13N3O2+H]+: 196.1086; found: 196.1084 [M + H], PPM = −1.0.

N,N’-(2-Nitrobenzenesulfonamide)-1-(p-nitrobenzyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (6)

Compound 6 was prepared according to a literature preparation.36 1H NMR (300 MHz, acetone-d6, 25 °C) δ: 8.18-8.15 (m, 1H), 7.99-7.94 (m, 2H), 7.79-7.57 (m, 5H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.04–6.98 (m, 2H), 4.01 (br s, 1H), 3.41-3.38 (m, 2H), 3.26 (dd, J = 3.4, 13.7 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, acetone-d6, 25 °C) δ: 206.3, 149.2, 148.1, 147.6, 146.7, 135.2, 134.8, 134.3, 133.9, 133.8, 133.6, 131.7, 131.4, 130.9, 126.0, 125.7, 123.9, 57.7, 49.4, 38.2. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C21H19N5O10S2+Na]+: 588.0471; found: 588.0465 [M+Na]+, PPM = −1.0.

N,N’-(2-Nitrobenzenesulfonamide)-N,N’′-[6-(methoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl]methyl]-1-(p-nitrobenzyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (7)

To a solution of 6 (1.03 g, 1.82 mmol) in dimethylformamide (5 mL, dried over molecular sieves 4 Å) was added methyl-6-bromomethylpicolinate (921 mg, 4.01 mmol) and sodium carbonate (~2 g). The yellow reaction mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 48 h, filtered to remove sodium carbonate, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by silica chromatography (CombiFlash Rf automated column system; 40 g HP silica; A: ethyl acetate, B: petroleum ether, 100% A to 100% B gradient) to yield 7 as white fluffy solid (Rf = 0.9 in DCM, 95%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 8.00–7.81 (m, 4H), 7.78-7.70 (m, 2H), 7.65-7.63 (m, 5H), 7.55-7.44 (m, 4H), 7.38-7.36 (m, 1H), 6.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.96-4.65 (m, 4 H), 4.36 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.56-3.50 (m, 1H), 3.39-3.31 (m, 1H), 3.15-3.01 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 164.9, 164.9, 157.5, 155.9, 147.7, 147.2, 147.0, 147.0, 146.1, 144.6, 137.9, 137.8, 133.7, 133.5, 132.4, 131.8, 131.8, 131.1, 130.0, 129.5, 126.7, 125.6, 124.1, 123.9, 123.9, 122.9, 58.4, 53.4, 52.6, 52.5, 52.2, 49.7, 34.5. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C37H33N7O14S2+Na]+: 886.1425; found: 886.1447, [M+Na]+, PPM = 2.5.

N,N’-[6-(Methoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl]methyl]-p-nitrobenzyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (8)

To a solution of 7 (1.39 g, 1.62 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (7 mL) was added thiophenol (364 µL, 3.55 mmol) and potassium carbonate (excess, ~1 g). The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 72 hours, while a slow color change from colorless to dark yellow occurred. The reaction mixture was split into two 20 mL falcon tubes, diluted with additional tetrahydrofuran, centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4000 rpm, and then the solvent was decanted. The potassium carbonate in the centrifuge tubes was rinsed with tetrahydrofuran and then centrifuged 5 times, pooled, and concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The resulting crude yellow oil was purified by alumina column chromatography (CombiFlash Rf automated column system; 24 g neutral alumina; A: dichloromethane, B: methanol, 100% A to 30% B gradient) to yield 8 as clear yellow oil (90%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 8.07–8.04 (m, 2H), 7.96-7.93 (m, 2H), 7.77-7.70 (m, 2H), 7.53-7.46 (m, 2H), 7.34-7.28 (m, 2H), 4.05-3.95 (m, 2H), 3.93-3.92 (s, 6H), 3.91-3.86 (m, 2H), 3.00–2.49 (m, 4H), 2.20 (br s, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C) δ: 165.6, 165.5, 160.5, 147.3, 147.2, 147.1, 146.3, 137.3, 130.0, 125.5, 123.4, 123.3, 58.3, 54.9, 52.7, 52.3, 51.7, 39.1. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C25H27N5O6+H]+: 494.2040; found: 494.2039, [M+H]+, PPM = −0.2.

N,N’-[Methylphosphonate]-N,N’-[(6-carboxylato)pyridin-2-yl)methyl]-1-(p-nitrobenzyl)-1,2-diaminoethane (9)

To a solution of 8 (96.0 mg, 0.194 mmol) in HCl (5 mL, 6 M) was added phosphorous acid (320 mg, 3.89 mmol), and the reaction mixture was brought to reflux. Paraformaldehyde (48.0 mg, 1.56 mmol) was added in small portions over 8 hours, and the resulting suspension/solution was refluxed overnight. An additional 8 equiv of paraformaldehyde (48.0 mg, 1.65 mmol) and 20 equiv of phosphorous acid (320 mg, 3.89 mmol) were added over a period of 8 hours and refluxing was continued for an additional night (48 h total). The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo, and the resulting yellow oil was purified by RP-HPLC on a semi-preparative column (A: 0.1% TFA in deionized water, B: 0.1% TFA in CH3CN, 5% B to 90% B gradient over 30 minutes) to yield 9 (Rt = 12 minutes) as a white solid (42%) (Figures S5–S7). 1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOD, 25 °C) δ: 8.12-7.94 (m, 2H), 7.82-7.62 (m, 2H), 7.51-7.34 (m, 3H), 7.24-7.16 (m, 2H), 7.03 (br s, 1H), 4.02-3.46 (m, 3H), 3.15-3.12 (m, 3H), 2.95-1.94 (several m, 7H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, MeOD, 25 °C) δ: 172.7, 172.3, 166.0, 158.2, 152.6, 152.2, 149.1, 145.8, 138.2, 137.7, 130.3, 125.8, 123.7, 123.5, 122.5, 122.3, 58.4, 55.8, 55.6, 54.2, 31.3. 31P[1H] NMR (121.5 MHz, D2O, 25 °C, externally referenced to 85% phosphoric acid) 16.4, 15.9. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C25H29N5O12P2+H]+: 654.1366; found: 654.1359, [M+H]+, PPM = −1.1.

p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa, N,N’-(methylphosphonate)-N,N’-[(6-carboxylato)pyridin-2-yl)methyl]-1-(p-benzyl-isothiocyanato)-1,2-diaminoethane (10)

Compound 9 (52.0 mg, 0.080 mmol) was dissolved in glacial acetic acid (1.5 mL) with hydrochloric acid (1.5 mL, 3 M), palladium on carbon (~10 mg, 20 wt%) was added, and hydrogen gas (balloon) bubbled in via rubber septa and syringe. The reaction mixture was stirred vigorously at RT for 1 hour, then filtered to remove Pd/C and washed ad libitum with methanol and hydrochloric acid (3 M). The crude reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo, and without purification, was dissolved in hydrochloric acid (1 mL, 3 M) and then reacted with thiophosgene in chloroform (91 µL, 1.20 mmol) overnight at ambient temperature with vigorous stirring. The reaction mixture was extracted with chloroform (5 × 1 mL) by vigorous biphasic stirring, followed by decanting and discarding of the organic phase with a pipette in the reaction vial to remove excess thiophosgene. The aqueous phase was diluted to a volume of 4.5 mL with deionized water, and injected directly onto a semi-prep RP-HPLC column for purification (A: 0.1% TFA in deionized water, B: 0.1% TFA in CH3CN, 5% B to 70% B gradient over 30 minutes). Compound 10 eluted at Rt = 17.5 minutes, was lyophilized overnight, and was isolated as a fluffy off-white solid (14% over 2 steps from 9) (Figures S8–S10). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C) δ: 8.17-7.90 (m, 3H), 7.76-7.63 (m, 3H), 7.46-7.23 (m, 4H), 54.54 (br s, 1H), 4.34-4.32 (m, 2H), 3.94-3.85 (m, 3H), 3.33-3.21 (m, 3H), 3.02-2.94 (m, 3H), 2.61 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, MeOD, 25 °C) δ: 174.5, 169.3, 167.4, 167.2, 160.8, 149.1, 148.6, 140.0, 139.9, 139.0, 137.1, 131.8, 131.7, 131.1, 128.0, 127.0, 126.9, 126.1, 125.3, 125.1, 61.1, 61.1, 38.2, 35.2, 34.7, 34.7. HR-ESI-MS calcd. for [C26H29N5O10P2S+Na]+: 688.1008; found: 688.0998, [M+H]+, PPM = −1.5. IR (neat, ATR-IR): ν = 2075 cm−1 (-N=C=S), 1719 cm−1 (C=O), 1594 cm−1 (C=N py), 1348 cm−1 (P=O).

Trastuzumab Bioconjugation

Trastuzumab (purchased commercially as Herceptin, Genentech, San Francisco, CA) was purified using centrifugal filter units with a 50,000 molecular weight cutoff (Amicon® ultra centrifuge filters, Ultracel®-50: regenerated cellulose, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to remove α-α-trehalose dihydrate, L-histidine, and polysorbate 20 additives. After purification, the antibody was taken up in PBS pH 7.4. Subsequently, 300 µL of antibody solution (150–250 µM) was combined with 100 µL PBS (pH 8.0) and 4 equiv of p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa in 10 µL DMSO, and the pH was adjusted to 9. The reactions were heated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by centrifugal filtration to purify the resultant antibody conjugate. The final modified antibody stock solutions were stored in PBS pH 7.4 at 4 °C.

111In-, 89Zr-, and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab Radiolabeling

Aliquots of the H6phospa-trastuzumab immunoconjugate were transferred to 2 mL microcentrifuge tubes and made up to 1 mL with ammonium acetate buffer (pH 5.5, 200 mM), and then aliquots of 177Lu or 111In were added (~1–3 mCi). The H6phospa-trastuzumab mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30–60 minutes at ambient temperature and then analyzed via iTLC with an eluent of 50 mM EDTA (pH 5). 30 µL of EDTA solution (50 mM, pH 5) was then added to the reaction mixtures to quench the reaction, and then the resulting radiolabeled immunoconjugates were purified using size-exclusion chromatography (Sephadex G-25 M, PD-10 column, 30 kDa, GE Healthcare; dead volume = 2.5 mL, eluted with 1 mL fractions of PBS, pH 7.4) and centrifugal column filtration (Amicon® ultra 50k). The radiochemical purity of the final radiolabeled bioconjugate was assayed by radio-iTLC. For 89Zr radiolabeling experiments, the same procedure was followed as above, with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) being used in place of ammonium acetate. 89Zr radiolabeling was also attempted in ammonium acetate (200 mM, pH 5.5–6.5) and HEPES buffer (100–500 mM, pH 7–7.2), with PBS ultimately deemed the most suitable buffer. In the iTLC experiments, 111In-, 89Zr-, and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab remained near the baseline, while 177Lu3+/111In3+/89Zr4+ ions were coordinated as [177Lu/111In/89Zr]-EDTA and eluted with or near the solvent front. iTLC methods were followed from previous work.3, 13, 36, 39, 43

Chelate Number – Radiometric Isotopic Dilution Assay

The number of accessible H6phospa chelates conjugated to trastuzumab was measured by radiometric isotopic dilution assays following methods similar to those described by Anderson et al. and Holland et al.3, 4446 The experimental procedure was modified to use 111In and SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells.36 All experiments were performed in triplicate. Conjugating 4 equivalents of p-SCN-Bn-H6phospa was found to yield 3.3 ± 0.1 accessible chelates per antibody. Aliquots of [111In]InCl3 (10 µL, <5 kBq [0.1 µCi]) were added to 12 solutions containing 1:2 serial dilutions of non-radioactive In(NO3)3 (aq.) (100 µL fractions; 100 – 0.05 nmol, pH 7.5 – 8.5). The mixture was vortexed for 30 s before adding aliquots of H6phospa-trastuzumab (20 µL, 5.0 mg/mL, [100 µg of mAb, 0.7 nmol], in 0.9% sterile saline). The reactions were incubated at room temperature for 1 h before quenching with EDTA (20 µL, 50 mM pH 7). The extent of complexation was assessed developing iTLC strips (EDTA, 50 mM) and counting the activity at the baseline and solvent front. The fraction of 111In-radiolabeled mAb (Ab) was plotted versus the inverse of the number of nano-moles of In3+ and the number of chelates was calculated from the gradient by Equation 1, where c is the number of accessible chelates, n(mAb) is the amount of mAb (nmol), and n(In3+) is the total number of In3+ added (nmol).47

c=Ab·n(In)n(mAb) (1)

In Vitro Immunoreactivity Assay

The immunoreactivity of the 111In/177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab bioconjugates was determined using radioactive cellular-binding assays following procedures derived from Lindmo et al.48, 49 To this end, SKOV-3 cells were suspended in microcentrifuge tubes at concentrations of 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, and 1.0 × 106 cells/mL in 500 µL PBS (pH 7.4). Aliquots of 111In/177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab (50 µL of a stock solution of 10 µCi in 10 mL of 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS pH 7.4) were added to each tube (n = 9; final volume: 550 µL), and the samples were incubated on a mixer for 60 min at room temperature. The treated cells were then pelleted via centrifugation (3000 rpm for 5 min), resuspended, and washed twice with cold PBS before removing the supernatant and counting the activity associated with the cell pellet. The activity data were background-corrected and compared with the total number of counts in appropriate control samples. Immunoreactive fractions were determined by linear regression analysis of a plot of (total/bound) activity against (1/[normalized cell concentration]). No weighting was applied to the data, and data were obtained as n = 9.

111In- and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab Blood Serum Competition Experiments

Frozen human blood serum was thawed for 30 minutes, and 300 µL aliquots were transferred to 2.0 mL Corning centrifuge vials. A portion of radiolabeled immunoconjugate (~300 µCi) was transferred to the blood serum (n = 3 for each chelator). Serum competition samples were then incubated at 37 ± 0.1 °C with gentle agitation (300 rpm) and analyzed via iTLC (Bioscan AR-2000) with an EDTA eluent (50 mM, pH 5.0) at time points 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours.

Cell Culture

Human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3 was obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC, Bethesda, MD) and maintained in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle medium: F-12 medium, supplemented with 10% heat- inactivated fetal calf serum (Omega Scientific, Tarzana, Ca), 2.0 mM glutamine, nonessential amino acids, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 units/mL streptomycin in a 37 °C environment containing 5% CO2. Cell lines were harvested and passaged weekly using a formulation of 0.25% trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA in Hank’s Buffered Salt Solution without calcium and magnesium.

SKOV-3 Xenograft Mouse Models

All experiments were performed under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol, and the experiments followed institutional guidelines for the proper and humane use of animals in research. Six- to eight-week-old athymic nu/nu female mice (NCRNU-M) were obtained from Taconic Farms Incorporated (Hudson, NY). Animals were housed in ventilated cages, were given food and water ad libitum, and were allowed to acclimatize for approximately 1 week prior to treatment. After several days, SKOV-3 tumors were induced on the right shoulder by a subcutaneous injection of 1.0 × 106 cells in a 100 µL cell suspension of a 1:1 mixture of fresh media/BD Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford, Ma).

111In- and 177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab SPECT/CT Imaging Studies

Mice with SKOV-3 ovarian cancer xenografts (right shoulder, ~2 mm diameter) were imaged with 111In (n = 2) and 177Lu (n = 2) labeled immunoconjugates, using a four-headed NanoSPECT/CT®PLUS camera (Bioscan Inc., Washington DC, USA) with a multi-pinhole focused collimator and a temperature controlled animal bed unit (Minerve equipment veterinaire). Nine pinhole apertures with a diameter of 2.5 mm were used on each head, with a field of view (FOV) of 24 mm. Settings of the 111In energy peaks were 245 and 171 keV, and the 177Lu peaks were 208, 112, and 56 keV. A CT at 45 kVp was acquired (180 projections, pitch of 1). Based on the helical CT topogram, SPECT images were obtained over a range of 85 mm. For H6phospa-trastuzumab mice were administered doses of ~800–810 µCi 111In-labeled (specific activity ~3 µCi/µg, ~ 250 µg of immunoconjugate per mouse) and ~575 µCi of 177Lu-labeled (~3 µCi/µg, ~ 190 µg) agents each in 200 µL of sterile saline (0.9% NaCl), via intravenous tail vein injection. Approximately 5 minutes prior to SPECT/CT image acquisition, mice were anesthetized via inhalation of 2% isoflurane/oxygen gas mixture (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL), placed on the scanner bed, and anesthesia was maintained during imaging using a reduced 1.5% isoflurane/oxygen mixture. Animals were imaged at 24, 72, and 120 h p.i. for 111In, and 24 / 72 h p.i. for 177Lu to determine the general 111In/177Lu-phospa-trastuzumab biodistribution and tumor uptake. 177Lu-immunoconjugate mice were imaged for 1.5–2 hours each, and 111In-immunoconjugate mice were imaged for 45–60 min each. Image collection was performed using Nucline software (V1.02 build 009), and images were processed and reconstructed using InVivoScope (2.00 patch3, 64 bit) and HiSPECT (v 1.4.3049) software.

Animal Protocol

All animal experiments were performed according to a protocol approved by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#08-07-013).

Supplementary Material

ESI

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Blesida Punzalan for skillful tail-vein injections, Dr. Pat Zanzonico and Valerie A. Longo for aid with SPECT/CT calibration, and Michael Doran for cell culture work. We acknowledge Nordion (Canada) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for grant support, NSERC for CGS-M/CGS-D fellowships (E.W.P.), and the University of British Columbia for a 4YF fellowship (E.W.P.). C.O. acknowledges the Canada Council for the Arts for a Killam Research Fellowship (2011–2013) and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a Forschungspreis, as well as Prof. P. Comba and his group in Heidelberg for hospitality. Services provided by the MSKCC Small-Animal Imaging Core Facility were supported in part by NIH grants R24 CA83084 and P30 CA08748. The authors also thank the NIH (Award 1F32CA1440138-01, BMZ) and the DOE (Award DE-SC0002184, JSL) for their generous funding.

Footnotes

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: 1H/13C NMR spectra and FT-ATR-IR spectra of final synthesized compounds, and iTLC radiochromatograms can be found in the supplementary information online. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/

Contributor Information

Jason S. Lewis, Email: lewisj2@mskcc.org.

Michael J. Adam, Email: adam@triumf.ca.

Chris Orvig, Email: orvig@chem.ubc.ca.

Notes and references

  • 1.Zeglis BM, Lewis JS. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:6168–6195. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01595d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deri MA, Zeglis BM, Francesconi LC, Lewis JS. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2013;40:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holland JP, Divilov V, Bander NH, Smith-Jones PM, Larson SM, Lewis JS. J. Nucl. Med. 2010;51:1293–1300. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.076174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Holland JP, Williamson MJ, Lewis JS. Mol. Imaging. 2010;9:1–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ikotun OF, Lapi SE. Future Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;3:599–621. doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang AJ, DeSilva R, Jain S, Lears K, Rogers B, Lapi S. Pharmaceuticals. 2012;5:79–93. doi: 10.3390/ph5010079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perk L, Visser O, Stigter-van Walsum M, Vosjan M, Visser G, Zijlstra J, Huijgens P, van Dongen G. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006;33:1337–1345. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0160-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Börjesson PKE, Jauw YWS, Boellaard R, de Bree R, Comans EFI, Roos JC, Castelijns JA, Vosjan MJWD, Kummer JA, Leemans CR, Lammertsma AA, van Dongen GAMS. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:2133–2140. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perk LR, Visser GWM, Vosjan MJWD, Stigter-van Walsum M, Tijink BM, Leemans CR, van Dongen GAMS. J. Nucl. Med. 2005;46:1898–1906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Verel I, Visser GWM, Boellaard R, Stigter-van Walsum M, Snow GB, van Dongen GAMS. J. Nucl. Med. 2003;44:1271–1281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wooten A, Madrid E, Schweitzer G, Lawrence L, Mebrahtu E, Lewis B, Lapi S. Applied Sciences. 2013;3:593–613. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walther M, Gebhardt P, Grosse-Gehling P, Würbach L, Irmler I, Preusche S, Khalid M, Opfermann T, Kamradt T, Steinbach J, Saluz H-P. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011;69:852–857. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zeglis BM, Mohindra P, Weissmann GI, Divilov V, Hilderbrand SA, Weissleder R, Lewis JS. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;22:2048–2059. doi: 10.1021/bc200288d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perk LR, Visser OJ, Stigter-van Walsum M, Vosjan MJWD, Visser GWM, Zijlstra JM, Huijgens PC, Dongen GAMS. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006;33:1337–1345. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0160-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:2858–2902. doi: 10.1021/cr900325h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramogida CF, Orvig C. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:4720–4739. doi: 10.1039/c3cc41554f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Price EW, Cawthray JF, Bailey GA, Ferreira CL, Boros E, Adam MJ, Orvig C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:8670–8683. doi: 10.1021/ja3024725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Camera L, Kinuya S, Garmestani K, Wu C, Brechbiel MW, Pai LH, McMurry TJ, Gansow OA, Pastan I, Paik CH, Carrasquillo JA. J. Nucl. Med. 1994;35:882–889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Förster GJ, Engelbach MJ, Brockmann JJ, Reber HJ, Buchholz HG, Mäcke HR, Rösch FR, Herzog HR, Bartenstein PR. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 2001;28:1743–1750. doi: 10.1007/s002590100628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu C, Kobayashi H, Sun B, Yoo TM, Paik CH, Gansow OA, Carrasquillo JA, Pastan I, Brechbiel MW. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1997;5:1925–1934. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0896(97)00130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brechbiel MW, Gansow OA, Atcher RW, Schlom J, Esteban J, Simpson D, Colcher D. Inorg. Chem. 1986;25:2772–2781. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harrison A, Walker CA, Parker D, Jankowski KJ, Cox JPL, Craig AS, Sansom JM, Beeley NRA, Boyce RA, Chaplin L, Eaton MAW, Farnsworth APH, Millar K, Millican AT, Randall AM, Rhind SK, Secher DS, Turner A. Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instrum. [B] 1991;18:469–476. doi: 10.1016/0883-2897(91)90107-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferdani R, Stigers DJ, Fiamengo AL, Wei L, Li BTY, Golen JA, Rheingold AL, Weisman GR, Wong EH, Anderson CJ. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:1938–1950. doi: 10.1039/c1dt11743b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suzuki K, Satake M, Suwada J, Oshikiri S, Ashino H, Dozono H, Hino A, Kasahara H, Minamizawa T. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2011;38:1011–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dumont RA, Deininger F, Haubner R, Maecke HR, Weber WA, Fani M. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:1276–1284. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fani M, Del Pozzo L, Abiraj K, Mansi R, Tamma ML, Cescato R, Waser B, Weber WA, Reubi JC, Maecke HR. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:1110–1118. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.087999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sprague JE, Peng Y, Fiamengo AL, Woodin KS, Southwick EA, Weisman GR, Wong EH, Golen JA, Rheingold AL, Anderson CJ. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:2527–2535. doi: 10.1021/jm070204r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Boswell CA, Sun X, Niu W, Weisman GR, Wong EH, Rheingold AL, Anderson CJ. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:1465–1474. doi: 10.1021/jm030383m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Notni J, Šimeček J, Hermann P, Wester H-J. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:14718–14722. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Notni J, Hermann P, Havlíčková J, Kotek J, Kubíček V, Plutnar J, Loktionova N, Riss PJ, Rösch F, Lukeš I. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:7174–7185. doi: 10.1002/chem.200903281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boros E, Ferreira CL, Yapp DTT, Gill RK, Price EW, Adam MJ, Orvig C. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2012;39:785–794. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bailey GA, Price EW, Zeglis BM, Ferreira CL, Boros E, Lacasse MJ, Patrick BO, Lewis JS, Adam MJ, Orvig C. Inorg. Chem. 2012;51:12575–12589. doi: 10.1021/ic302225z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Boros E, Ferreira CL, Cawthray JF, Price EW, Patrick BO, Wester DW, Adam MJ, Orvig C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:15726–15733. doi: 10.1021/ja106399h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mato-Iglesias M, Balogh E, Platas-Iglesias C, Toth E, Blas Ad, Blas TR. Dalton Trans. 2006:5404–5415. doi: 10.1039/b611544f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Balogh E, Mato-Iglesias M, Platas-Iglesias C, Toth E, Djanashvili K, Peters JA, de Blas A, Rodriguez-Blas T. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:8719–8728. doi: 10.1021/ic0604157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Price EW, Zeglis BM, Cawthray JF, Ramogida CF, Ramos N, Lewis JS, Adam MJ, Orvig C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:12707–12721. doi: 10.1021/ja4049493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vosjan MJWD, Perk LR, Visser GWM, Budde M, Jurek P, Kiefer GE, van Dongen GAMS. Nat. Protocols. 2010;5:739–743. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perk L, Vosjan M, Visser G, Budde M, Jurek P, Kiefer G, van Dongen G. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010;37:250–259. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1263-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Holland JP, Sheh Y, Lewis JS. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009;36:729–739. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mawani Y, Cawthray JF, Chang S, Sachs-Barrable K, Weekes DM, Wasan KM, Orvig C. Dalton Trans. 2013;42:5999–6011. doi: 10.1039/c2dt32373g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Barta CA, Sachs-Barrable K, Jia J, Thompson KH, Wasan KM, Orvig C. Dalton Trans. 2007:5019–5030. doi: 10.1039/b705123a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar Mishra A, Panwar P, Chopra M, Kumar Sharma R, Chatal J-F. New J. Chem. 2003;27:1054–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zeglis BM, Sevak KK, Reiner T, Mohindra P, Carlin SD, Zanzonico P, Weissleder R, Lewis JS. J. Nucl. Med. 2013;54:1389–1396. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.115840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Holland JP, Caldas-Lopes E, Divilov V, Longo VA, Taldone T, Zatorska D, Chiosis G, Lewis JS. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Anderson CJ, Connett JM, Schwarz SW, Rocque PA, Guo LW, Philpott GW, Zinn KR, Meares CF, Welch MJ. J. Nucl. Med. 1992;33:1685–1691. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Anderson CJ, Schwarz SW, Connett JM, Cutler PD, Guo LW, Germain CJ, Philpott GW, Zinn KR, Greiner DP, Meares CF, Welch MJ. J. Nucl. Med. 1995;36:850–858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Smith-Jones PM, Fridrich R, Kaden TA, Novak-Hofer I, Siebold K, Tschudin D, Maecke HR. Bioconjugate Chem. 1991;2:415–421. doi: 10.1021/bc00012a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lindmo T, Boven E, Cuttitta F, Fedorko J, Bunn PA., Jr J. Immunol. Methods. 1984;72:77–89. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90435-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lindmo T, Bunn PA., Jr Methods Enzymol. 1986;121:678–691. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)21067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESI

RESOURCES