Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2013 Oct 20;73:10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.004. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.004

Association between the seven-repeat allele of the dopamine-4 receptor gene (DRD4) and spontaneous food intake in pre-school children

Patrícia Pelufo Silveira 1,9, André Krumel Portella 1, James L Kennedy 2, Hélène Gaudreau 1, Caroline Davis 3, Meir Steiner 4, Claudio N Soares 4, Stephen G Matthews 5, Marla B Sokolowski 6,7, Laurette Dubé 8, Eric B Loucks 10, Jill Hamilton 11, Michael J Meaney 1,12, Robert D Levitan 2, on behalf of the MAVAN Study Team
PMCID: PMC3872500  NIHMSID: NIHMS533410  PMID: 24153108

Abstract

Background

Studies in adults show associations between the hypofunctional seven-repeat allele (7R) of the dopamine-4 receptor gene (DRD4), increased eating behaviour and/or obesity, particularly in females. We examined whether 7R is associated with total caloric intake and/or food choices in pre-schoolers.

Methods

150 four-year-old children taking part in a birth cohort study in Canada were administered a snack test meal in a laboratory setting. Mothers also filled out a food frequency questionnaire to address childrens’ habitual food consumption. Total caloric and individual macronutrient intakes during the snack meal and specific types of foods as reported in the food diaries were compared across 7R allele carriers vs. non-carriers, using current BMI as a co-variate.

Results

We found significant sex by genotype interactions for fat and protein intake during the snack test. Post-hoc testing revealed that in girls, but not boys, 7R carriers ate more fat and protein than did non-carriers. Based on the food diaries, across both sexes, 7R carriers consumed more portions of ice cream and less vegetables, eggs, nuts and whole bread, suggesting a less healthy pattern of habitual food consumption.

Conclusion

The 7R allele of DRD4 influences macronutrient intakes and specific food choices as early as four years of age. The specific pattern of results further suggests that prior associations between the 7R allele and adult overeating/obesity may originate in food choices observable in the preschool years. Longitudinal follow-up of these children will help establish the relevance of these findings for obesity risk and prevention.

Keywords: feeding behavior, dopamine, DRD4, food intake, child behavior, reward

INTRODUCTION

Food preferences are influenced by variables such as experience with food, cultural factors and perceived health benefits (Aaron et al., 1994, Sullivan and Birch, 1994, Poppitt and Prentice, 1996). Studies also suggest that genetic differences contribute to individual variation in taste perception (Kim et al., 2003), preference for specific flavors (Mennella et al., 2005), food choices (Tepper et al., 2009) and total energy intake (Cecil et al., 2008). Increased eating behaviour is a core aspect of disorders including binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, obesity, and mood disorders including atypical depression and seasonal affective disorder (American Psychiatric Association., 2000). One important contributor to increased food intake in these various contexts seems to be an exaggerated sensitivity to the rewarding aspects of food, a phenomenon observed in both adults (Davis et al., 2009, Appelhans et al., 2011) and children (van den Berg et al., 2011, Verbeken et al., 2012) alike.

Both animal and human studies suggest that alterations in brain dopamine activity and/or receptor sensitivity play a role in food reward processes and eating behaviour (Stice et al., 2008, Saper et al., 2002, Grigson, 2002). Food-related cues activate brain areas that are either involved in the synthesis and release of dopamine or are targets for dopamine projections (Killgore et al., 2003, Rothemund et al., 2007). Activity in these areas is proportional to the subjective pleasure associated with food (Small et al., 2003, Demos et al., 2012). Sweet and fatty foods potentiate a greater release of dopamine, inducing more pleasurable subjective feelings than their less palatable counterparts (Grigson, 2002, Martel and Fantino, 1996). Functional magnetic resonance imaging in response to imagined intake of palatable foods shows that future increases in body mass can be predicted by weaker brain activation of specific brain areas, particularly in individuals carrying low functioning variants of dopamine receptor genes, such as the DRD2 TaqIA A1 allele or the DRD4-7R allele (Stice et al., 2008, Stice et al., 2010).

The exon III 7-repeat allele (7R) of DRD4 has been associated with markedly decreased affinity for dopamine and impaired intracellular signaling in comparison to other exon III alleles (Asghari et al., 1995). Our group has studied the 7R allele in several disorders characterized by increased eating that are most prevalent in females (Levitan et al., 2006, Levitan et al., 2004, Kaplan et al., 2008). We found that among women with seasonal affective disorder, who experience both carbohydrate craving and weight gain during winter depressive episodes, the 7-repeat allele of DRD4 was associated with childhood dysphoria and both binge eating and obesity in adulthood. Similar results were found in women with bulimia nervosa (Kaplan et al., 2008). DRD4 7-repeat carriers also report significantly more craving for food in a cue-elicited food-craving test (Sobik et al., 2005).

While several associations between dopamine system genes and various aspects of overeating and weight gain are emerging in adults, no such studies have been done in children. Childhood represents a dynamic period for the development of individual differences in eating habits and food preferences. Given that childhood overweight is a strong predictor of overweight and obesity into young adulthood (Deshmukh-Taskar et al., 2006), awareness of individual vulnerability to these conditions is of great importance.

Extending from findings in adult overeating populations, this study examined whether the hypo-functional 7-repeat (7R) allele of the dopamine-4 receptor gene (DRD4) is associated with total food intake and macronutrient preferences in pre-school children. Given our prior findings in female overeater populations (Levitan et al., 2004, Kaplan et al., 2008, Levitan et al., 2006), and significant evidence for sex differences in eating behaviour and obesity (Cooke and Wardle, 2005, Galloway, 2007), as well as for brain reward processes (Hurd et al., 1999, Adinoff et al., 2003), we hypothesized that different relationships between the 7R allele and eating behaviour would emerge in girls and boys i.e. that only girls carrying the 7R allele would exihibit preference for highly palatable, highly caloric foods (rich in fat and/or sugar). We report here our findings in a cohort of preschool children taking part in a longitudinal study of neurodevelopment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study sample included 4-year old children from Montreal (Quebec) and Hamilton (Ontario), Canada. Participants were recruited from an established prospective birth cohort (Maternal Adversity, Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment - MAVAN). Eligibility criteria for mothers included age ≥18 years, singleton gestation, and fluency in French or English. Women with severe chronic illness, placenta previa, and history of incompetent cervix, impending delivery, or a fetus/infant affected by a major anomaly or born at a gestational age less than 37 weeks were excluded. Birth records were obtained directly from the birthing unit. At the time of the current study, there were 150 participants who had enrolled in the MAVAN study at birth, participated in the age 4y follow-up exam, and agreed to come to the study laboratory for the test meal.

The sample was comparable to the overall birth cohort in terms of maternal age at childbirth (Student’s T Test, p=0.653), birth weight (p=0.212), gestational age (p=0.993), prevalence of the 7 repeat allele (Chi-square, p=0.208), income categories (p=0.120), and maternal education (p=0.174).

MAVAN is a multidisciplinary, collaborative study that includes several laboratories from across Canada. We recruited pregnant women from obstetric clinics in hospitals located in Montreal, Quebec and Hamilton, Ontario. We excluded cases of very low birth weight and include only infants born at 37 to 41 weeks gestation. The maternal age at childbirth was also comparable to the general population (study sample = 30 years, Quebèc =29.3 years, Ontario=30.1 years) (Statistics Canada, 2012). By design, MAVAN over-samples from low SES settings, thus the prevalence of families receiving income below the Low Income Cut Off was near 30% vs. 15% in the general population (Statistics Canada 2009). However, while education below 10 years was found in 4% of the mothers of our sample, this number reaches 12% of adults in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario (Statistics Canada, 2011). In sum, SES status was relatively low but education relatively high relative to population norms.

Approval for the MAVAN Project was obtained from obstetricians performing deliveries at the study hospitals and by the ethics committees at hospitals and university affiliates (McGill University and l’Université de Montréal: the Royal Victoria Hospital, Jewish General Hospital, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, and Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont.).

Saliva samples were collected and sent to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Neurogenetics Laboratory after the parents or guardians provided written informed consent and the children provided assent. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using the high-salt method. All genotyping of the DNA was performed blind to the children’s behavior and phenotype. The 48-base-pair variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) region in the third exon of DRD4 was amplified with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques with primers and conditions previously described (Lichter et al., 1993).

Children and mothers were exposed to a test meal at approximately 10:30 a.m. including different types of foods in pre-weighed portions for 30 minutes (Frosted Flakes®, sliced apple, muffin with chocolate drops, 3.25% milk, baked beans, croissant, cooked egg, cheddar cheese, All Bran®, white bread, orange juice), table 1. Foods were chosen with the orientation of a nutritionist to represent local habitual snack items and to have similar colours (Addessi et al., 2005). Mothers were instructed to offer a light breakfast to participants at home beforehand and not to share plates or influence the children’s choices. Based on the nutritional content of each food and the amount eaten, we calculated the amount of fat, carbohydrates and protein ingested (Westerterp-Plantenga et al., 1996, Zandstra et al., 2000, Vozzo et al., 2003, Boudville and Bruce, 2005). The test meal was eaten in the laboratory, in a 30m2 room. A table with two sets of plates was placed in the center of the room, with chairs for mother and child on both sides (facing each other). A cushion was placed on the child’s chair to facilitate accessibility of the different foods. Various efforts were made to standardize this procedure between subjects, such as booking the lab visits at mid-morning to reduce variation in satiety and hormonal levels relevant to feeding behavior; making notes on the time and content of the last meal,; noting whether the child slept while driving to the laboratory or not and asking the families to avoid booking the laboratory measure the day after large “food events” such as birthdays or parties. The laboratory visit was always booked on the birthday month to ensure that children were within a few weeks of being 48 months old at the time of the Snack Test and questionnaires.

Table 1.

Portion sizes and content of the Snack test

Food Portion size Kcal/portion Fat (g/portion) Protein (g/portion) Carbohydrates (g/portion)
Froasted Flakes 30g 110 0.2 1.0 27
All bran 30g 97 0.4 3.5 24
Milk 3.25% 200 ml 128 6.4 7.2 10
Orange juice 200 ml 96 0 0.8 23
Croissant 2 units (35g) 130 6.6 4.4 15
Egg 1 unit 77 5.3 6.3 0.5
White bread 1 slice 100 1.2 3.5 18.5
Apple 100g 52 0.2 0.3 14
Maple syrup beans 200g 272 1.2 12 54
Cheese 50g 200 16.7 12 0
Muffin with chocolate drops 1 unit (60g) 210 5.0 3.0 36

Children had 30 minutes to freely choose and eat; portions were weighed befoe and after the exposure.

One-hundred thirty one children had complete food frequency questionnaires for analysis, (Langevin et al., 2007, Miller et al., 2008), valid for the local population (Ordre Professionnel Des Diététistes Du Québec, 2000). This is a standard procedure used to evaluate feeding behavior and habitual consumption in children (Goran, 1998, Biro et al., 2002). Mothers were asked to report their child’s intake of various foods on a typical day, with the aid of a food and measures photo album to estimate the portion size of each food (Katamay et al., 2007). Based on these reports, the quantitative analysis of total caloric and macronutrient intake is derived using NutriBase® software (Version NB7 Network) [Phoenix, AZ, US]. Using this software, the quantitative measure used to assess intake of specific groups of foods for this study was daily portions (see Table 3).

Table 3.

Habitual consumption of specific foods – Food frequency questionnaire

Girls Boys ANCOVA

7R− (n-44) 7R+ (n=22) 7R− (n=39) 7R+ (n=28) Sex DRD4 Int

Rice, pasta, cereal 0.83±0.09 0.87±0.10 0.89±0.06 0.97±0.13
Fruits
Fruits, citric juice, other juices
3.16±0.75 3.01±0.39 2.92±0.35 2.38±0.26
Milk products
Milk, yogurt, cheese, cream soup
3.43±0.29 3.44±0.41 4.03±0.29 3.54±0.46
Take outs
Hot dog, pizza, chinese food, hamburguer
0.21±0.03 0.27±0.04 0.32±0.04 0.25±0.03
Meats
Chicken, beef, liver sausage
1.25±0.11 1.26±0.18 1.51±0.41 1.22±0.10
Fat toppings
Bacon lard, sauces, mayonese, margarine, butter
1.59±0.25 1.55±0.28 1.54±0.21 1.85±0.26
Ice cream 0.13±0.05 0.30±0.09 0.12±0.03 0.14±0.03 # *
Sweets
Chocolate, honey, maple syrup, jelly Jam, sugar, desserts
1.03±0.15 0.81±0.13 0.95±0.11 1.09±0.16
Eggs, nuts, whole bread
Eggs, peanut butter, nuts, whole bread
1.90±0.22 1.24±0.19 2.06±0.30 1.70±0.18 *
Beans 0.11±0.03 0.22±0.06 0.15±0.03 0.14±0.03
Vegetables
Cooked and uncooked vegetables, potatoes
1.93±0.22 1.55±0.26 1.71±0.20 1.55±0.18 *
Cookies and biscuits 1.62±0.29 3.29±1.26 1.79±0.24 1.81±0.38
White bread, cake 0.35±0.06 0.53±0.15 0.45±0.07 0.46±0.15

Data are expressed as mean±SEM of portions/day. For the analysis, Two-Way-ANOVA adjusted for BMI and total energy intake was performed.

*

P<0.05

#

P<0.06

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared (kg/m2). Standing height, without shoes, was measured (to the nearest 0.1 cm) with the use of a stadiometer (Perspective Enterprises, PE-AIM-101, Portage, Michigan). Body weight, in light clothing, was measured (to the nearest 0.1 kg) with the use of a digital floor scale (TANITA BF625, Arlington Heights, Illinois). These measurements were performed during the laboratory visit by trained researcher assistants.

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics were performed for potential confounders (including sex, race/ethnicity, birth weight, gestational age, being born small for gestational age, maternal age at birth, maternal education, family income and total duration of breastfeeding) using Student t-tests (for continuous variables) and chi-squared tests (for categorical variables). In addition, we compared anthropometric variables between the groups at 48 months of age using a 2 (sex) by 2 (genotype) ANOVA. The genetic model used was based on the known hypo-functionality of the 7R allele relative to other DRD4 exon-3 VNTR alleles (Ashgari et al, 1995) i.e. 7R carriers were compared to non-carriers, as has been done in prior research (Levitan et al, 2004, 2006; Kaplan et al, 2008; Stice et al, 2008). Genotype combinations have not been shown to be relevant in the literature, therefore to assess associations between total caloric intake, as well as individual macronutrient intakes, and both sex and genotype (7R present or absent), ANCOVA was used adjusting for BMI as a covariate. ANCOVA was also used to assess consumption of groups of foods (based on food frequency questionnaires) adjusting for current BMI and total energy intake reported in the food diary. Based on our hypothesis, when significant sex x genotype interaction effects were found, posthoc testing was limited to 2 pair-wise comparisons i.e. comparing 7R carriers to non-carriers in females and males considered separately, continuing to use BMI as covariate. Considering that population stratification may account for the findings, a separate series of analyses using only Caucasians was also performed. Furthermore, considering that birth weight may affect food preferences (Barbieri et al., 2009, Silveira et al., 2012, Portella et al., 2012), an analysis adjusted by birth weight was also included. Finally, considering that potential cultural influences on food choices may differ between different cities, analysis after adjustment for site (Montreal vs. Hamilton) was also performed and is reported on the Results section. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Parametric continuous data were expressed as mean ± SEM.

RESULTS

The frequency of the common 4R, 7R, and 2R alleles was 64%, 20.6% and 10.3% respectively, highly consistent with prior studies in Canadian adults (23, 24). There were 58 study subjects (38.7%; 31 boys and 27 girls) who carried at least one 7R allele. The complete distribution of genotypes was: (92 (61.3%) non-7R/non-7R, 54 (36.0 %) heterozygous for 7R, and 4 (2.7%) homozygous for 7R; this met criteria for Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium). Table 2 depicts baseline characteristics of subjects with and without at least one 7R allele. There were no statistically significant differences found for sex, ethnicity, maternal education, family income and maternal age at the baby’s birth and total duration of breastfeeding at 12 months of age. Of note, there were more SGA children among the 7R non-carriers, with a lower mean birth weight in this group; gestational age was similar between 7R carriers and non-carriers. Two-way ANOVA showed no differences in anthropometrics based on DRD4 genotype, sex or the genotype x sex interaction (Table 2).

Table 2.

Study participants’ baseline characteristics according to genotype (DRD4 7 repeat positive vs. Negative). Data are expressed as mean±SEM or proportions (percentages).

Sample characteristics DRD4 7 repeat negative (n= 92) DRD4 7 repeat positive (n=58) 7 repeat negative vs. positive (p)*
Males (%) 47/92 (31.3%) 31/58 (20.7%) 0.45
Caucasian (%) 69/79 (53.1%) 46/51 (35.4%) 0.42
Birth weight (g) 3230.40±57.17 3418.52±60.52 0.02
Gestational age (weeks) 38.91±0.14 39.28±0.16 0.09
SGA (%) 26/90 (17.6%) 7/58 (7.4%) 0.012
Maternal age at birth (y) 29.49±0.55 30.78±0.60 0.12
Maternal education below 10 years (%) 2/76 (1.6%) 4/51 (3.1%) 0.17
Family income below LICO (%) 23/90 (15.6%) 13/57 (8.8%) 0.43
Total duration of breastfeeding (weeks) 25.77±2.06 26.07±2.52 0.93
Anthropometric measurements at 48 months of age Males (n=47) Females (n=45) Males (n=31) Females (n=27) Sex vs. Genotype comparison
Body weight (kg) 17.71±0.40 17.30±0.59 17.23±0.35 16.53±0.50 0.77
Height (cm) 103.59±0.88 101.78±0.85 102.59±0.96 103.45±1.07 0.19
BMI (kg/m2) 16.20±0.23 16.46±0.40 16.14±0.24 15.47±0.28 0.19

For the analysis of the study sample characteristics, Student’s T Test and Chi-square test were used. For the anthromometric measurements analysis, Two-Way-ANOVA showed no differences between the groups (see Results section). The same results are found if using height, weight and BMI z scores (WHO, 2006). Totals may differ for some variables because of missing data. LICO=Low Income Cut Off (Statistics Canada, 2005). SGA=Small for gestational age (birth weight below 10th percentile, 46).

Food consumption during the test meal

Total Energy Intake

ANCOVA revealed no main effect of genotype on total caloric intake [F(1,147)=0.968, p=0.327], while the main effect of sex was significant, with boys consuming more calories than girls [F(1,147)=8.587, p=0.004]. The sex-by-genotype interaction was not significant [F(1,147)=1.813, p=0.180]. Fig 1A.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Food consumption during the test meal. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. For the analysis, ANCOVA was performed using genotype and sex as independent variables and current BMI as co-variates. 1A – Total caloric intake; 1B – Fat consumption; 1C – Carbohydrate consumption; 1D – Protein consumption. *P<0.05 for pairwise comparisons of genotype within sex.

Macronutrient Intake

ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction between sex and DRD4 genotype in predicting fat consumption [F(1,147)=6.981, p=0.009]. Post-hoc testing revealed that in girls, 7R carriers show greater fat consumption than did non-carriers (p=0.022; Fig 1B). In boys, there was no significant difference in fat consumption based on genotype (p=0.110).

For carbohydrate consumption, there was no main effect of genotype [F(1,147)=2.066, p=0.153]. However, the main effect of sex was significant, with boys consuming more carbohydrates than girls [F(1,147)=8.967, p=0.003]. The sex-by-genotype interaction was also not significant [F(1,147)=0.313, p=0.577]. (Fig 1C).

For protein consumption there was a significant sex-x-genotype interaction [F(1,147)=5.681, p=0.018]. Girls with the 7R allele had increased protein intake when compared to non-carriers (p=0.049), while in boys there was no such difference (p=0.111, Fig. 1D).

The analysis adjusted by site (Montreal vs. Hamilton) yielded the same effects.

Habitual food consumption from the food frequency questionnaire

The means (± SEM) of reported daily portions for each food are summarized in Table 3. The 7R allele was associated with an increased consumption of ice cream [95% CI 0.16–0.30 portions] when compared to non-carriers [95% CI 0.06–0.17 portions, p=0.011]. The main effect of sex did not reach statistical significance [p =0.057] and there was no interaction sex vs. genotype [p=0.116]. There was also a decreased consumption of eggs/nuts/whole bread in the 7R carriers [95% CI 0.99–1.75 portions] as compared to non-carriers [95% CI 1.73–2.33 portions, p=0.008], without main effect of sex [p=0.156] or interaction sex vs. genotype [p=0.192]. 7R carriers also consumed less vegetable portions [95% CI 1.13–1.79] than did non-carriers [95% CI 1.64–2.15, p=0.04], without main effect of sex [p=0.695] or interaction sex vs. genotype [p=0.225].

The analysis adjusted by site (Montreal vs. Hamilton) regarding macronutrient intake yielded the same results.

Analysis of Caucasian Probands

To determine whether population stratification might have accounted for the current findings, we repeated our main analyses in the subgroup of probands of Caucasian ancestry (N=115). In this sub-sample, the overall statistical model remained highly significant in the genotype vs. sex interaction for fat [F(1,114)=4.410, p=0.034] and met a trend level of significance for protein consumption [F(1,114)=3.643, p=0.059] during the test meal. The results were also comparable for the habitual food consumption of of ice cream [95% CI 0.14–0.23 portions in 7R carriers compared to 0.06–0.12 portions in non-carriers, P=0.001] and eggs/nuts/whole bread [95% CI 0.84–1.73 portions in 7R carriers compared to 1.78–2.47 portions in non-carriers, P=0.004]; vegetable consumption was similar between the genotype groups [95% CI 1.09–1.86 portions in 7R carriers compared to 1.60–2.18 portions in non-carriers, P=0.100]. Thus, limiting the analysis to Caucasian probands only did not have a major effect on the overall pattern of results.

Adjustment for birth weight, gestational age and BMI z scores

To determine whether the group differences in the prevalence of SGA shown in Table 2 might have accounted for the current findings, we repeated our main analyses adjusting the results for the birth weight ratio (the ratio between the infant birth weight and the sex-specific mean birth weight for each gestational age for the local population) (Kramer et al., 2001). The overall statistical model remained significant with respect to the genotype vs. sex interactions for fat [F(1,145)=6.891, p=0.010] and protein consumption [F(1,145)=5.609, p=0.019] during the test meal. The results were also comparable for the habitual food consumption of of ice cream [95% CI 0.17–0.31 portions in 7R carriers compared to 0.06–0.17 in non-carriers, P=0.007] and eggs/nuts/whole bread [95% CI 0.97–1.73 portions in 7R carriers compared to 1.75–2.35 portions in non-carriers, P=0.005]; vegetables consumption met a trend level of significance [95% CI 1.17–1.82 portions in 7R carriers compared to 1.62–2.13 portions in non-carriers, P=0.07]. Thus, adjusting the analysis for the birth size/gestational age did not have a major effect on the overall pattern of results.

Adjusting the analysis for BMI z scores (WHO, 2006) instead of raw BMI lead to the same results in all analysis.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between a dopamine gene variant and eating behavior in a pediatric sample, and among the first to show a specific genetic effect on macronutrient selection as early as 48 months of age (Cecil et al., 2008). We found interactions between the hypofunctional 7R allele of the DRD4 exon-3 VNTR polymorphism and sex on spontaneous macronutrient consumption in 4-year old children. Specifically, we demonstrated that girls who carried the 7R allele ate significantly more fat and proteins than did non-carriers. We also found effects of the 7R allele on the daily consumption of specific foods, decreasing the ingestion of vegetables and eggs, nuts and whole bread and increasing the consumption of ice cream, suggesting a less healthy pattern of habitual food consumption. It was recently shown that among adolescent males high in depressive symptoms, 7R carriers reported consuming less low-calorie foods than non-carriers(Agurs-Collins and Fuemmeler, 2011); although contradicing our gender specific findings, the study supports the genetic evidence demonstrated here.

The 7R allele has previously been linked to binge eating and obesity in women with winter seasonal affective disorder (Levitan et al., 2006, Levitan et al., 2004) and to maximal lifetime BMI in women with bulimia nervosa (Kaplan et al., 2008). This same allele has also been associated with increased fat free mass in a migrating population of males in Africa (Eisenberg et al., 2008). Our data extend these findings by demonstrating that the 7R allele is related to feeding behavior during early childhood. Further follow-up will be needed to determine the relevance of these findings in predicting eating behaviour and/or obesity as the cohort ages.

Considering that 7R allele carriers report increased craving for both food (Sobik et al., 2005) and drugs (Hutchison et al., 2002) in cue-elicited tasks, as well as demonstrate a biased attention for contextually cued emotion stimuli (Wells et al., 2013), it is possible that the current results related to 7R were mediated by reward processes, with the particular macronutrient preference depending on sex differences. In other words, as the Snack Test provides the real food cues to the children in order to measure consumption (as opposed to the information assessed by the food diaries), the increased fat and protein intakes seen in girls carrying the 7R allele could be a result of increased contextual salience of these macronutrients during this task. One of the strengths of the present study is that food choices were assessed using actual food consumption under controlled conditions, as well as using a mother-report of habitual food intake, and the results between the two tools were consistent. Any apparent discrepancy between the two measurements could be explain by the fact that, by design, the two measurements (Snack Test and Food Frequency questionnaire) are very different. While the Snack Test was performed to elicit spontaneous food preferences (in this study, for specific macronutrients), the second represents the habitual consumption of the children, which is more influenced by other variables such as availability (not necessarily preference), maternal induction, maternal perception of what is consumed, etc. Therefore, in our point of view, the comparison between the two tools should be more general (healthy choices vs. non-healthy, palatable foods vs. regular foods, etc), and not specific for macronutrients, because the two tools measure different aspects of feeding behavior in different ways.

There are several potential mechanisms that could explain emerging links between the 7R allele and increased food intake (Levitan et al., 2004, Kaplan et al., 2008, Levitan et al., 2006). For example, studies in animals have proposed a possible role for DRD4 in satiety processes mediated at the level of the hypothalamus (Huang et al., 2005). The DRD4 receptor is predominantly localized in areas that are innervated by meso-cortical projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), including the prefrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, and insula (Schoots and Van Tol, 2003). Studies link the 7-repeat allele to reduced dopamine functioning (Asghari et al., 1995), suggesting it may affect reward sensitivity. Various lines of work demonstrate that 7-repeat carriers have an increased risk for several reward-based psychopathologies including substance abuse (Vandenbergh et al., 2000, Ellis et al., 2011, Brody et al., 2012), pathological gambling (Comings et al., 2001), opiate dependence (Kotler et al., 1997), binge drinking (Vaughn et al., 2009), promiscuous sexual behavior and sexual infidelity (Garcia et al., 2010), increased sensitivity to alcohol’s effects on social bonding(Creswell et al., 2012), increased consumption of cigarettes per day in smokers (Das et al., 2011) as well as novelty seeking (Benjamin et al., 1996, Ebstein et al., 1997, Ebstein et al., 1996). It is well established that food per se is a potent activator of the brain’s reward circuitry (Grigson, 2002, Holden, 2001, Volkow and Wise, 2005).

Understanding the genetic basis of food intake and food preferences in school aged children and adolescents is extraordinarily difficult due to the major confounding effects of hormonal changes, body image concerns, and dieting (Hill, 2002). As the current sample was studied at just 48 months of age, our results are likely to be independent of these factors, and provide an excellent starting point to understand genetic contributions to eating behaviour over the lifespan.

This study was limited by a small sample size and resulting statistical power, especially when considering multiple interactions (such as gene x sex x environment), which need further exploration in future studies for which a larger sample size is needed. In this sample, there were more SGA children in the 7R non-carrier group (7R−), which could be a confounding factor, as we have previously shown that that intrauterine growth alters the behavior towards a food reward and increases the consumption of palatable foods (Barbieri et al., 2009, Silveira et al., 2012, Portella et al., 2012); therefore, having more SGA children in the 7R− group might have limited our ability to show the group differences that were found here. The adjusted analysis demonstrated that the genotype effects and interactions with sex on macronutrient spontaneous macronutrient intake in the test meal and habitual food consumption are independent of fetal growth.

It is possible that maternal attitudes and behaviours, differentially expressed in boys and girls, contributed in some way to our findings. However, several other sex differences that have more direct relevance to the DRD4 gene, merit further consideration (Reiner and Spangler, 2011, Dmitrieva et al., 2011). One unique feature of the hypo-functional 7R allele - the main focus of the current analyses - is its positive selection over the past 45,000 years of human evolution (Ding et al., 2002). Based on findings from various genetic association studies linking the 7R allele to different phenotypes, prior authors have suggested that the basis for this positive selection may have included a nutritional and/or reproductive advantage in men in the context of migration (Eisenberg et al., 2008, Harpending and Cochran, 2002), and/or a similar advantage in women related to seasonal conservation of body mass at northern latitudes (Levitan et al., 2004, Levitan et al., 2006). It is difficult to speculate on how the current findings might relate to the positive selection of the 7R allele, however when combined with these prior studies, the current results suggest that an ability of 7R to optimize food intake in the face of predictably adverse environments, modified based on the unique long term survival and/or reproductive needs of the two sexes, is of some interest.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the DRD4 7-repeat allele affects habitual food consumption and interacts with sex to influence macronutrient preferences early in childhood. Considering that some 7R carriers are prone to binge eating and overweight in adulthood (Levitan et al., 2004, Levitan et al., 2006), it is possible that altered feeding preferences established early in life contribute to this vulnerability. Knowledge about these specific behavioral characteristics may be important for obesity prevention and primary care, and to understand the origins of various disorders of eating behavior and mood.

Highlights.

  • We found that girls who were 7R-carriers ate more fat and protein in a snack-test paradigm.

  • 7R-carriers from both sexes consumed more ice cream in a food frequency questionnaire.

  • 7R-carriers ate fewer portions of vegetables, eggs, nuts and whole bread.

  • These pre-school children were not overweight or obese.

  • The 7R allele of the DRD4 gene appears to influence macronutrient intake and food choice early in childhood.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR). Silveira PP was funded by a CIHR fellowship grant (200610CFE-170826-164844). The authors thank Tamara Arenovich for her help with statistical analyses and Jessica Grummitt for her help with data management.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. AARON JI, MELA DJ, EVANS RE. The influences of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite. 1994;22:25–37. doi: 10.1006/appe.1994.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ADDESSI E, GALLOWAY AT, VISALBERGHI E, BIRCH LL. Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2–5-year-old children. Appetite. 2005;45:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ADINOFF B, DEVOUS MD, SR, BEST SE, CHANDLER P, ALEXANDER D, PAYNE K, HARRIS TS, WILLIAMS MJ. Gender differences in limbic responsiveness, by SPECT, following a pharmacologic challenge in healthy subjects. Neuroimage. 2003;18:697–706. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. AGURS-COLLINS T, FUEMMELER BF. Dopamine polymorphisms and depressive symptoms predict foods intake. Results from a nationally representative sample. Appetite. 2011;57:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. APPELHANS BM, WOOLF K, PAGOTO SL, SCHNEIDER KL, WHITED MC, LIEBMAN R. Inhibiting food reward: delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:2175–2182. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ASGHARI V, SANYAL S, BUCHWALDT S, PATERSON A, JOVANOVIC V, VAN TOL HH. Modulation of intracellular cyclic AMP levels by different human dopamine D4 receptor variants. J Neurochem. 1995;65:1157–1165. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65031157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BARBIERI MA, PORTELLA AK, SILVEIRA PP, BETTIOL H, AGRANONIK M, SILVA AA, GOLDANI MZ. Severe intrauterine growth restriction is associated with higher spontaneous carbohydrate intake in young women. Pediatr Res. 2009;65:215–220. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31818d6850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BENJAMIN J, LI L, PATTERSON C, GREENBERG BD, MURPHY DL, HAMER DH. Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet. 1996;12:81–84. doi: 10.1038/ng0196-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. BIRO G, HULSHOF KF, OVESEN L, AMORIM CRUZ JA, GROUP E. Selection of methodology to assess food intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002;56(Suppl 2):S25–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. BOUDVILLE A, BRUCE DG. Lack of meal intake compensation following nutritional supplements in hospitalised elderly women. Br J Nutr. 2005;93:879–884. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. BRODY GH, CHEN YF, YU T, BEACH SR, KOGAN SM, SIMONS RL, WINDLE M, PHILIBERT RA. Life stress, the dopamine receptor gene, and emerging adult drug use trajectories: a longitudinal, multilevel, mediated moderation analysis. Dev Psychopathol. 2012;24:941–951. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. CECIL JE, TAVENDALE R, WATT P, HETHERINGTON MM, PALMER CN. An obesity-associated FTO gene variant and increased energy intake in children. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2558–2566. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. COMINGS DE, GADE-ANDAVOLU R, GONZALEZ N, WU S, MUHLEMAN D, CHEN C, KOH P, FARWELL K, BLAKE H, DIETZ G, MACMURRAY JP, LESIEUR HR, RUGLE LJ, ROSENTHAL RJ. The additive effect of neurotransmitter genes in pathological gambling. Clin Genet. 2001;60:107–116. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. COOKE LJ, WARDLE J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences. Br J Nutr. 2005;93:741–746. doi: 10.1079/bjn20051389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. CRESWELL KG, SAYETTE MA, MANUCK SB, FERRELL RE, HILL SY, DIMOFF JD. DRD4 polymorphism moderates the effect of alcohol consumption on social bonding. PLoS One. 2012;7:e28914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. DAS D, TAN X, EASTEAL S. Effect of model choice in genetic association studies: DRD4 exon III VNTR and cigarette use in young adults. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2011;156B:346–351. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. DAVIS CA, LEVITAN RD, REID C, CARTER JC, KAPLAN AS, PATTE KA, KING N, CURTIS C, KENNEDY JL. Dopamine for “wanting” and opioids for “liking”: a comparison of obese adults with and without binge eating. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1220–1225. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. DEMOS KE, HEATHERTON TF, KELLEY WM. Individual differences in nucleus accumbens activity to food and sexual images predict weight gain and sexual behavior. J Neurosci. 2012;32:5549–5552. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5958-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. DESHMUKH-TASKAR P, NICKLAS TA, MORALES M, YANG SJ, ZAKERI I, BERENSON GS. Tracking of overweight status from childhood to young adulthood: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:48–57. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. DING YC, CHI HC, GRADY DL, MORISHIMA A, KIDD JR, KIDD KK, FLODMAN P, SPENCE MA, SCHUCK S, SWANSON JM, ZHANG YP, MOYZIS RK. Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:309–314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012464099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. DMITRIEVA J, CHEN C, GREENBERGER E, OGUNSEITAN O, DING YC. Gender-specific expression of the DRD4 gene on adolescent delinquency, anger and thrill seeking. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011;6:82–89. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. EBSTEIN RP, NEMANOV L, KLOTZ I, GRITSENKO I, BELMAKER RH. Additional evidence for an association between the dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III repeat polymorphism and the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Mol Psychiatry. 1997;2:472–477. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. EBSTEIN RP, NOVICK O, UMANSKY R, PRIEL B, OSHER Y, BLAINE D, BENNETT ER, NEMANOV L, KATZ M, BELMAKER RH. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nat Genet. 1996;12:78–80. doi: 10.1038/ng0196-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. EISENBERG DT, CAMPBELL B, GRAY PB, SORENSON MD. Dopamine receptor genetic polymorphisms and body composition in undernourished pastoralists: an exploration of nutrition indices among nomadic and recently settled Ariaal men of northern Kenya. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. ELLIS JA, OLSSON CA, MOORE E, GREENWOOD P, VAN DE VEN MO, PATTON GC. A role for the DRD4 exon III VNTR in modifying the association between nicotine dependence and neuroticism. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:64–69. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. GALLOWAY T. Gender differences in growth and nutrition in a sample of rural Ontario schoolchildren. Am J Hum Biol. 2007;19:774–788. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. GARCIA JR, MACKILLOP J, ALLER EL, MERRIWETHER AM, WILSON DS, LUM JK. Associations between dopamine D4 receptor gene variation with both infidelity and sexual promiscuity. PLoS One. 2010;5:e14162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. GORAN MI. Measurement issues related to studies of childhood obesity: assessment of body composition, body fat distribution, physical activity, and food intake. Pediatrics. 1998;101:505–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. GRIGSON PS. Like drugs for chocolate: separate rewards modulated by common mechanisms? Physiol Behav. 2002;76:389–395. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00758-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. HARPENDING H, COCHRAN G. In our genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012612799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. HILL AJ. Developmental issues in attitudes to food and diet. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61:259–266. doi: 10.1079/PNS2002152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. HOLDEN C. ‘Behavioral’ addictions: do they exist? Science. 2001;294:980–982. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5544.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. HUANG XF, YU Y, ZAVITSANOU K, HAN M, STORLIEN L. Differential expression of dopamine D2 and D4 receptor and tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA in mice prone, or resistant, to chronic high-fat diet-induced obesity. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;135:150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. HURD YL, SVENSSON P, PONTEN M. The role of dopamine, dynorphin, and CART systems in the ventral striatum and amygdala in cocaine abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;877:499–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. HUTCHISON KE, LACHANCE H, NIAURA R, BRYAN A, SMOLEN A. The DRD4 VNTR polymorphism influences reactivity to smoking cues. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111:134–143. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.111.1.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. KAPLAN AS, LEVITAN RD, YILMAZ Z, DAVIS C, THARMALINGAM S, KENNEDY JL. A DRD4/BDNF gene-gene interaction associated with maximum BMI in women with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2008;41:22–28. doi: 10.1002/eat.20474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. KATAMAY SW, ESSLINGER KA, VIGNEAULT M, JOHNSTON JL, JUNKINS BA, ROBBINS LG, SIROIS IV, JONES-MCLEAN EM, KENNEDY AF, BUSH MA, BRULE D, MARTINEAU C. Eating well with Canada’s Food Guide (2007): development of the food intake pattern. Nutr Rev. 2007;65:155–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. KILLGORE W, YOUNG A, FEMIA L, BOGORODZKI P, ROGOWSKA J, YURGELUN-TODD D. Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high-versus low-calorie foods. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1381–1394. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00191-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. KIM UK, JORGENSON E, COON H, LEPPERT M, RISCH N, DRAYNA D. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science. 2003;299:1221–1225. doi: 10.1126/science.1080190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. KOTLER M, COHEN H, SEGMAN R, GRITSENKO I, NEMANOV L, LERER B, KRAMER I, ZER-ZION M, KLETZ I, EBSTEIN RP. Excess dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III seven repeat allele in opioid-dependent subjects. Mol Psychiatry. 1997;2:251–254. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. KRAMER MS, PLATT RW, WEN SW, JOSEPH KS, ALLEN A, ABRAHAMOWICZ M, BLONDEL B, BREART G FETAL/INFANT HEALTH STUDY GROUP OF THE CANADIAN PERINATAL SURVEILLANCE S. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E35. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. LANGEVIN DD, KWIATKOWSKI C, MCKAY MG, MAILLET JO, TOUGER-DECKER R, SMITH JK, PERLMAN A. Evaluation of diet quality and weight status of children from a low socioeconomic urban environment supports “at risk” classification. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1973–1977. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. LEVITAN RD, MASELLIS M, BASILE VS, LAM RW, KAPLAN AS, DAVIS C, MUGLIA P, MACKENZIE B, THARMALINGAM S, KENNEDY SH, MACCIARDI F, KENNEDY JL. The dopamine-4 receptor gene associated with binge eating and weight gain in women with seasonal affective disorder: an evolutionary perspective. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56:665–669. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. LEVITAN RD, MASELLIS M, LAM RW, KAPLAN AS, DAVIS C, THARMALINGAM S, MACKENZIE B, BASILE VS, KENNEDY JL. A birth-season/DRD4 gene interaction predicts weight gain and obesity in women with seasonal affective disorder: A seasonal thrifty phenotype hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:2498–2503. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. LICHTER JB, BARR CL, KENNEDY JL, VAN TOL HH, KIDD KK, LIVAK KJ. A hypervariable segment in the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:767–773. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.6.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. MARTEL P, FANTINO M. Mesolimbic dopaminergic system activity as a function of food reward: a microdialysis study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996;53:221–226. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)00187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. MENNELLA JA, PEPINO MY, REED DR. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e216–222. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. MILLER SA, TAVERAS EM, RIFAS-SHIMAN SL, GILLMAN MW. Association between television viewing and poor diet quality in young children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008;3:168–176. doi: 10.1080/17477160801915935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. ORDRE PROFESSIONNEL DES DIÉTÉTISTES DU QUÉBEC. Manuel de nutrition clinique, Éd. Guy Connolly, 3ième édition; Quèbec: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  51. ORGANIZATION, W. H. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group: WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. Geneva: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  52. POPPITT SD, PRENTICE AM. Energy density and its role in the control of food intake: evidence from metabolic and community studies. Appetite. 1996;26:153–174. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. PORTELLA AK, KAJANTIE E, HOVI P, DESAI M, ROSS MG, GOLDANI MZ, ROSEBOOM TJ, SILVEIRA PP. Effects of in utero conditions on adult feeding preferences. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2012;3:140–152. doi: 10.1017/S2040174412000062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. REINER I, SPANGLER G. Dopamine D4 receptor exon III polymorphism, adverse life events and personality traits in a nonclinical German adult sample. Neuropsychobiology. 2011;63:52–58. doi: 10.1159/000322291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. ROTHEMUND Y, PREUSCHHOF C, BOHNER G, BAUKNECHT HC, KLINGEBIEL R, FLOR H, KLAPP BF. Differential activation of the dorsal striatum by high-calorie visual food stimuli in obese individuals. Neuroimage. 2007;37:410–421. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. SAPER CB, CHOU TC, ELMQUIST JK. The need to feed: homeostatic and hedonic control of eating. Neuron. 2002;36:199–211. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00969-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. SCHOOTS O, VAN TOL HH. The human dopamine D4 receptor repeat sequences modulate expression. Pharmacogenomics J. 2003;3:343–348. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. SILVEIRA PP, AGRANONIK M, FARAS H, PORTELLA AK, MEANEY MJ, LEVITAN RD MATERNAL ADVERSITY V, NEURODEVELOPMENT STUDY T. Preliminary evidence for an impulsivity-based thrifty eating phenotype. Pediatr Res. 2012;71:293–298. doi: 10.1038/pr.2011.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. SMALL DM, JONES-GOTMAN M, DAGHER A. Feeding-induced dopamine release in dorsal striatum correlates with meal pleasantness ratings in healthy human volunteers. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1709–1715. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00253-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. SOBIK L, HUTCHISON K, CRAIGHEAD L. Cue-elicited craving for food: a fresh approach to the study of binge eating. Appetite. 2005;44:253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. STATISTICS CANADA. Live births, mean age of mother, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (years) (CANSIM Table 102–4504) Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. STATISTICS CANADA. Low Income Cut Offs for 2005 and Low Income measures for 2004, Catalogue no. 75F0002MIE. 2005;4 [Google Scholar]
  63. STATISTICS CANADA. Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics, 2000 and 2009. Statistics Canada; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  64. STATISTICS CANADA. Education Indicators in Canada: An International Perspective 2011. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  65. STICE E, SPOOR S, BOHON C, SMALL DM. Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele. Science. 2008;322:449–452. doi: 10.1126/science.1161550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. STICE E, YOKUM S, BOHON C, MARTI N, SMOLEN A. Reward circuitry responsivity to food predicts future increases in body mass: moderating effects of DRD2 and DRD4. Neuroimage. 2010;50:1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. SULLIVAN SA, BIRCH LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics. 1994;93:271–277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. TEPPER BJ, WHITE EA, KOELLIKER Y, LANZARA C, D’ADAMO P, GASPARINI P. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1170:126–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03916.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. VAN DEN BERG L, PIETERSE K, MALIK JA, LUMAN M, WILLEMS VAN DIJK K, OOSTERLAAN J, DELEMARRE-VAN DE WAAL HA. Association between impulsivity, reward responsiveness and body mass index in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35:1301–1307. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. VANDENBERGH DJ, RODRIGUEZ LA, HIVERT E, SCHILLER JH, VILLAREAL G, PUGH EW, LACHMAN H, UHL GR. Long forms of the dopamine receptor (DRD4) gene VNTR are more prevalent in substance abusers: no interaction with functional alleles of the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) gene. Am J Med Genet. 2000;96:678–683. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<678::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. VAUGHN MG, BEAVER KM, DELISI M, HOWARD MO, PERRON BE. Dopamine D4 receptor gene exon III polymorphism associated with binge drinking attitudinal phenotype. Alcohol. 2009;43:179–184. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. VERBEKEN S, BRAET C, LAMMERTYN J, GOOSSENS L, MOENS E. How is reward sensitivity related to bodyweight in children? Appetite. 2012;58:478–483. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. VOLKOW ND, WISE RA. How can drug addiction help us understand obesity? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:555–560. doi: 10.1038/nn1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. VOZZO R, WITTERT G, COCCHIARO C, TAN WC, MUDGE J, FRASER R, CHAPMAN I. Similar effects of foods high in protein, carbohydrate and fat on subsequent spontaneous food intake in healthy individuals. Appetite. 2003;40:101–107. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. WELLS TT, BEEVERS CG, KNOPIK VS, MCGEARY JE. Dopamine D4 receptor gene variation is associated with context-dependent attention for emotion stimuli. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16:525–534. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. WESTERTERP-PLANTENGA MS, MJ IJ, WIJCKMANS-DUIJSENS NE. The role of macronutrient selection in determining patterns of food intake in obese and non-obese women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50:580–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. ZANDSTRA EH, MATHEY MF, GRAAF C, VAN STAVEREN WA. Short-term regulation of food intake in children, young adults and the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54:239–246. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES