Relationship between anterior disc displacement with/without reduction and effusion in temporomandibular disorder patients using magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between anterior disc displacement and effusion in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

The study subjects included 253 TMD patients. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T MRI scanner. T1- and T2-weighted images with para-sagittal and para-coronal images were obtained. According to the MRI findings, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc positions were divided into 3 subgroups: normal, anterior disc displacement with reduction (DWR), and anterior disc displacement without reduction (DWOR). The cases of effusion were divided into 4 groups: normal, mild (E1), moderate (E2), and marked effusion (E3). Statistical analysis was made by the Fisher's exact test using SPSS (version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The subjects consisted of 62 males and 191 females with a mean age of 28.5 years. Of the 253 patients, T1- and T2-weighted images revealed 34 (13.4%) normal, DWR in 103 (40.7%), and DWOR in 116 (45.9%) on the right side and 37 (14.6%) normal, DWR in 94 (37.2%), and DWOR in 122 (48.2%) joints on the left side. Also, T2-images revealed 82 (32.4%) normal, 78 (30.8%) E1, 51 (20.2%) E2, and 42 (16.6%) E3 joints on the right side and 79 (31.2%) normal, 85 (33.6%) E1, 57 (22.5%) E2, and 32 (12.7%) E3 on the left side. There was no difference between the right and left side.

Conclusion

Anterior disc displacement was not related to the MRI findings of effusion in TMD patients (P>0.05).

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has been accepted as the best method for making a diagnostic assessment of TMJ status.1-3

Internal derangement (ID) of the TMJ is when the disc is located outside of its normal position in the joint spaces. The normal disc position means a 12 o'clock position of the posterior band and a 10 o'clock position of the intermediate zone of the disc. The disc has a "bow tie" shape with a thin intermediate zone with the narrowest inter-bony distance.2 Displacement of the disc can present along a spectrum of displacements in any direction, but anterior disc displacement is most common.

Larheim3 and Larheim et al4 reported that the TMJ disc position seemed to be different in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and asymptomatic volunteers. Disc displacement without reduction (DWOR) was found to be frequent in TMD patients; however, it was very rare in asymptomatic volunteers.

Disc displacement with or without reduction of the TMJ is an intracapsular dysfunction that leads to degenerative changes in the disc and articular surface.5 TMJ dysfunction may be either a progressive disorder or one that resolves spontaneously. Initially, patients present with symptoms of clicking or popping, which is the result of anterior disc displacement with reduction (DWR). As the disease progresses, the posterior attachment becomes stretched and the disc is no longer recaptured on mouth opening. ID may eventually result in degenerative changes to the TMJ.2

Deformation of the disc is frequently found in non-reducing conditions, and the normal biconcave configuration seems to change as a result of the displacement.6 Deformations of the disc such as a thick posterior band, a folded shape, and particularly the later biconvex deformation, can be clearly seen in MRI.

Yano et al7 reported that effusion is the state of accumulation of joint fluid in the joint spaces and surrounding tissue. Joint effusion is defined in MRI as bright T2 signals in articular spaces, whereas the disc of a normal TMJ has relatively low signal intensity.

Various articles7-10 have reported ID or effusion in TMJ; however, Koh et al11 noted that a variety of diagnostic criteria have been used, and the relationship between ID and effusion is still unclear.

This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between ID and effusion in TMD patients using MRI.

Materials and Methods

The study subjects included 253 TMD patients (506 TMJs) who had visited Chonbuk National University Dental Hospital with signs and symptoms of ID from 2008 to 2012.

MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T MRI scanner (Symphony, Siemens, Olangan, Germany) with a 7.5-cm surface coil. A 3-mm section thickness with a 140 mm×140 mm field of view (FOV) and spin echo (SE) multisection images were used for the T1-weighted images (T1WIs: repetition time (RT) ms/echo time (TE) ms=510-520/11-15) and T2-weighted images (T2WIs: TR/TE=2410-2740/40-107). Eighteen para-coronal and 11 parasagittal images were obtained. According to the MRI findings, the TMJ disc positions were classified into the 3 subgroups of normal (Fig. 1A), DWR (Fig. 1B), and DWOR (Fig. 1C) on the T1WIs and T2WIs. Here, DWR and DWOR included antero-medial and antero-lateral displacement. The disc position classifications were defined as follows:

Fig. 1.

Magnetic resonance images show the TMJ disc positions. A. Normal: The posterior band of the disc is located above the apex of the condylar head (at the 12 o'clock position) with the mouth closed (top) and with the mouth opened 1 inch (bottom). B. Disc displacement with reduction (DWR): The posterior band of the disc is located anteriorly to the condylar head with the mouth closed (top), but has a normal disc-condyle relationship with the mouth opened 1 inch (bottom). C. Disc displacement without reduction (DWOR): The posterior band is positioned anterior to the condyle both with the mouth closed (top) and with the mouth opened 1 inch (bottom).

Normal: The posterior band of the disc was located above the apex of the condylar head (at the 12 o'clock position) in the closed mouth position as described by Styles and Whyte2 and the thin intermediate zone was between the condyle and the articular eminence with the mouth opened 1 inch.

DWR: The posterior band of the disc was located anteriorly to the condylar head in the closed position, but with a normal disc-condyle relationship with the mouth opened 1 inch.

DWOR: The posterior band was positioned anteriorly to the condyle both with the mouth closed and opened 1 inch.

The shape of each disc was classified as biconcave, biconvex, folded, lengthened, or a thick posterior band shape. Round configurations were classified as biconvex.

The degree of effusion was determined as described by Larheim et al,4 but TMJ effusions were classified into 4 subgroups of normal, mild effusion (E1), moderate effusion (E2), and marked effusion (E3) on T2WIs. The specifications for the classification of TMJ effusions are as follows:

Mild effusion: a dot or line of bright signal intensity along the articular surface as described by Westesson and Brooks9 (Fig. 2A)

Fig. 2.

T2-weighted magnetic resonance images show effusion in the joint spaces. A. Mild effusion: a dot or line of bright signal intensity along the articular surface. B. Moderate effusion: between mild and marked effusion. C. Marked effusion: collection with pooling in the joint space.

Moderate effusion: between mild and marked signal intensity (Fig. 2B)

Marked effusion: collection with pooling in the joint space (Fig. 2C)

Evaluations of MR images were performed at different points in time by two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists. When there was disagreement, the final assessment was reached by consensus.

Statistical analysis was made by the Fisher's exact test using SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All of the P-values <0.05 in the comparison of ID and effusion were considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the gender distribution of the study subjects. The subjects consisted of 62 males (24.5%) and 191 females (75.5%). The ratio between the males and females was 0.3. Table 2 shows the age distribution of the study subjects. Of the 253 TMD patients, the second and third decades were predominant (67.6%). The mean age was 28.5 years, with a range of 13 to 78 years.

Table 1.

Gender distribution of the study subjects

Table 2.

Age distribution of the study subjects

Table 3 shows the distribution of anterior disc displacement according to the site. All of the patients had a unilateral or bilateral TMJ disc ID. Of the 253 right TMJ discs examined, T1WIs and T2WIs revealed normal cases in 34 (13.4%), DWR in 103 (40.7%), and DWOR in 116 (45.9%) of the discs. Of the 253 left TMJ discs examined, T1WIs and T2WIs revealed normal cases in 37 (14.6%), DWR in 94 (37.2%), and DWOR in 122 (48.2%) of the discs. There was no difference between the right and left sides.

Table 3.

Distribution of anterior disc displacement

ADD: anterior disc displacement, DWR: anterior disc displacement with reduction, DWOR: anterior disc displacement without reduction

Table 4 shows the disc configuration of the TMJ. Deformity of the disc was found in 163 of 506 (32.2%) TMJ discs. There were 343 (67.8%) discs with no deformity, whereas 62 (12.2%) of the discs were biconvex, 52 (10.3%) were folded, 35 (6.9%) were lengthened, and 14 (2.8%) were thick posterior bands. Folded and biconvex configurations were more common in cases of DWR and DWOR.

Table 4.

Disc configuration of the temporomandibular joint on magnetic resonance imaging

Rt: right, Lt: left, ADD: anterior disc displacement, DWR: anterior disc displacement with reduction, DWOR: anterior disc displacement without reduction

Table 5 shows the distribution of effusion according to the site. Of the 253 right TMJs, T2WIs revealed normal cases in 82 (32.4%), E1 in 78 (30.8%), E2 in 51 (20.2%), and E3 in 42 (16.6%) joints, respectively. Of the 253 left TMJs, T2WIs revealed normal cases in 79 (31.2%), E1 in 85 (33.6%), E2 in 57 (22.5%), and E3 in 32 (12.7%) joints, respectively. There was no difference between the right and left side. Anterior disc displacement with/without reduction was not significantly related to effusion in the TMD patients (P>0.05).

Table 5.

Distribution of effusion according to the site on magnetic resonance imaging

E1: mild effusion, E2: moderate effusion, E3: marked effusion

Discussion

MRI has the advantage of displaying both soft and hard tissue changes in the TMJ, and clearly shows the shape of the disc. Many MRI studies have reported that about 80% of patients referred for diagnostic imaging of the TMJ will have an imaging diagnosis of disc displacement.1,3,4,12 However, MRI results can be influenced by such factors as MRI technique, imaging protocol, diagnostic criteria, and observer performance.11 In this study, the MRI protocol consisted of a 1.5 T field strength, TMJ coil, T1WIs and T2WIs, and para-saggital and para-coronal images. Therefore, the protocol probably had a minimal effect on the results.

On the other hand, diagnostic criteria used for the disc position on the MRI have varied. Some studies1,9,13 have used previously presented criteria, whereas several other studies have used their own classification systems.12,14-17 In this study, according to the diagnostic criteria as described by Styles and Whyte,2 76% of TMD patients had ID bilaterally, and there was no difference between the right and left side.

An alteration in disc shape has been recognized as an important feature of ID of the TMJ, and the disc deformation appears to occur secondary to disc displacement. Deformation most commonly begins with thickening and enlargement of the posterior band of the disc.18 Using MRI, Taşkaya-Yilmaz and Oğütcen-Toller5 categorized the disc configuration as biconcave (normal), folded, lengthened, round, biconvex, and thickened posterior band. Disc deformation associated with disc displacement appears more frequently with a greater degree of displacement such as disc displacement without reduction. Helms et al reported that 17% of joints that had anteriorly displaced discs with reduction had degenerative joint disease, whereas 95% of joints with displaced discs without reduction had degenerative changes.19 An MRI can be used to visualize the morphology of the disc in order to grade the severity of the ID.

In this study, round shapes were classified as biconvex, and folded and biconvex configurations were more common in cases of DWR and DWOR. Therefore, it seemed that many TMD patients had disc displacement in an advanced stage.

The differing definitions used for joint effusion in several studies9,20-23 might have affected their results. Larheim et al4 reported that there was a need to define what was an abnormal amount of fluid because TMJ fluid was frequently observed in asymptomatic volunteers as well and was related to the disc displacement. Therefore, Larheim et al4 classified joint effusion as moderate or marked. They reported that almost all of the TMD patients (96%) had ID, mostly bilateral (80%). The joint effusion was predominantly unilateral (61.4%). However, in this study, the degree of effusion was classified into three groups-minimal, moderate, or marked, and 44% of the TMD patients had bilateral effusion. Murakami et al24 reported that the quantity and quality of effusion varied according to the changes in the TMJ. Suenaga et al25 demonstrated that the change in the amount of effusion could be detected through biochemical analysis of the joint fluid.

Various studies concerning the relationship between ID and joint effusion have been performed.4,7-9 Effusion is frequently observed on MRI in patients with ID of the TMJ.4,9,20,22,26 Larheim et al4 demonstrated that moderate and marked fluid was related to disc displacement. Manfredini et al27 reported that joint effusion was related to disc displacement without reduction. Huh et al28 suggested that the effusion-disc displacement association might become evident at more advanced stages of disc displacement, thus representing an indicator of the progression of the disease to a more chronic condition. Tasaki et al1 reported that the disc displacement was observed unilaterally or bilaterally in 82% of the TMD patients and in 30% of the asymptomatic volunteers. Yano et al7 reported that no significant difference was observed between the quantity of joint fluid and the grade of disc displacement, although even a minimal amount of fluid was regarded as being positive for fluid in that study. In this study, ID was not related to joint effusion in the TMD patients.

Observer performance greatly influences MRI diagnosis of disc position and joint effusion.29 In this study, observations were performed by two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists for the minimization of inter-observer variation.

The results of this study suggested that ID with/without reduction was not related to the MRI findings of effusion in TMD patients. Further research will be required to determine the relationship between clinical findings and effusion on MRI.

Table 6.

Results of statistical analysis of the relationship between anterior disc displacement with/without reduction and effusion on the right temporomandibular joint

ADD: anterior disc displacement, DWR: anterior disc displacement with reduction, DWOR: anterior disc displacement without reduction, E1: mild effusion, E2: moderate effusion, E3: marked effusion

Table 7.

Results of statistical analysis of the relationship between anterior disc displacement with/without reduction and effusion on the left temporomandibular joint

ADD: anterior disc displacement, DWR: anterior disc displacement with reduction, DWOR: anterior disc displacement without reduction, E1: mild effusion, E2: moderate effusion, E3: marked effusion