Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Jul 10;55(5):10.1177/0020764008094645. doi: 10.1177/0020764008094645

Prevalence of Anxiety, Depression and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women of Hyderabad, Pakistan

Rozina Karmaliani 1,*, Nargis Asad 1, Carla M Bann 2, Nancy Moss 3, Elizabeth M McClure 2, Omrana Pasha 1, Linda L Wright 3, Robert L Goldenberg 4
PMCID: PMC3875176  NIHMSID: NIHMS540230  PMID: 19592433

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined the relationship between antenatal depression, anxiety and domestic violence in pregnant women in developing countries, despite the World Health Organization's estimates that depressive disorders will be the second leading cause of the global disease burden by 2020. There is a paucity of research on mood disorders, their predictors and sequelae among pregnant women in Pakistan.

Aims

To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depression and evaluate associated factors, including domestic violence, among pregnant women in an urban community in Pakistan.

Methods

All pregnant women living in identified areas of Hyderabad, Pakistan were screened by government health workers for an observational study on maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. Of these, 1368 (76%) of eligible women were administered the validated Aga Khan University Anxiety Depression Scale at 20–26 weeks of gestation.

Results

18 percent of the women were anxious and/or depressed. Psychological distress was associated with husband unemployment (p=0.032), lower household wealth (p=0.027), having 10 or more years of formal education (p=0.002), a first (p=0.002) and an unwanted pregnancy (p<0.001). The strongest factors associated with depression/anxiety were physical/sexual and verbal abuse; 42% of women who were physically and/or sexually abused and 23% of those with verbal abuse had depression/anxiety compared to 8% of those who were not abused.

Conclusions

Anxiety and depression commonly occur during pregnancy in Pakistani women; rates are highest in women experiencing sexual/physical as well as verbal abuse, but they also are increased among women with unemployed spouses and those with lower household wealth. These results suggest that developing a screening and treatment program for domestic violence and depression/anxiety during pregnancy may improve the mental health status of pregnant Pakistani women.

Keywords: Pregnancy, depression, anxiety, Pakistan, measurement

Introduction

Historically, pregnancy has been viewed as a period of well-being that allowed women to feel biologically “complete” and that provided “protection” for some women against psychiatric disorders (Alshuler, 1998; Dennis, 2007). Although for many women, pregnancy is a time for enjoyment and fulfillment, evidence indicates that there is an increase in psychiatric morbidity, and particularly depression, during pregnancy for a proportion of women (Carter, 2005; Fatoye, 2004). Depression during the perinatal period can have devastating consequences, not only for the women experiencing it, but also for the women's children and family (Alder, 2007; Burke, 2003). Antenatal depression and anxiety can also have a negative impact on the developing fetus (Allister, 2001; Dieter, 2001) and have been associated with premature births and lower birth weights (Field, 2004; Rondo, 2003).

Few studies have examined antenatal depression and anxiety among pregnant women in developing countries, despite World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that depressive disorders will be the second leading cause of the global disease burden by 2020 (WHO, 2002). Rates of depressive illness in women of reproductive age are believed to be at least twice those observed in men (Ali, 2000; Mumford, 1997; Murray, 1996).

Using data from developed countries, Bennett and colleagues (2004) conducted a meta-analysis of 21 studies reporting rates of depression during pregnancy. Based on 19,284 pregnant women, the prevalence of depression was estimated at 7.4, 12.8, and 12.0 percent during the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy, respectively. Studies in developed countries suggest a link between domestic violence and antenatal depression and anxiety. A clinic-based study of Japanese pregnant women found that 5.4 percent experienced domestic violence during pregnancy and these women were significantly more likely to experience anxiety and depression (Kataoka, 2005). Studies from Australia, the U.S., and Sweden also have found that domestic violence is associated with increased depression and anxiety (Austin, 2005; Hathaway, 2000).

More research is needed to examine the prevalence of and risk factors for antenatal depression and anxiety among women in developing countries such as Pakistan. In general, rates of depression among Pakistani women may be as high as 66 percent (Hussain, 2000). Married women in Pakistan appear to be at greater risk for depression than single women (Fikree, 1999; Khan, 1998). Kazi (2006) reported that increasing age, lower educational levels, the presence of a husband and in-laws, heavy household work and pregnancy symptoms were significantly associated with total depression scores.

Depression and anxiety during pregnancy have not been systematically reported in Pakistan and are not commonly considered to be an indicator of women's health in this geographic region. Most prior studies of mental health during pregnancy in Pakistan have been hospital-based (Niaz, 2004) and therefore, may have excluded women who did not obtain prenatal care in a clinical setting. The goals of the current study were to estimate the prevalence of and identify precursors for antenatal anxiety and depression among women participating in a community-based study in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Through the use of outreach health workers, we were able to screen women who received prenatal care in their homes. In addition, we examined the role of an abusive environment and the form of abuse (i.e., verbal vs. physical abuse) on a women's psychological distress during pregnancy because links could inform health care policy by increasing screening and providing interventions as a part of antenatal care.

Methods

Study Procedures

This research was conducted as a part of a prospective observational study of pregnant women in Hyderabad, Pakistan, an Urdu-speaking city of about one million inhabitants. The city is served by outreach health workers of the national program for Family Planning and Primary Health Care Centers. The parent study examined a range of socio-demographic, psychosocial, nutritional, and clinical factors associated with infectious morbidity and pregnancy outcomes among mothers and infants. The study was conducted by researchers from the Aga Khan University (AKU), Karachi, Pakistan together with U.S. colleagues from the University of Alabama, Birmingham, Research Triangle Institute (RTI), and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). The team is part of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research, a multi-country research network.

Outreach workers, referred to as Lady Health Workers (LHWs), were hired, trained and certified to conduct demographic, depression/anxiety and domestic violence interviews and to follow participants for periodic clinical evaluations. To protect confidentiality, the interviews were conducted without family members present. The structured interview was prepared in English, translated into Urdu and back-translated into English. The interview consists of open and close-ended questions with alternative responses (available upon request). A question-by-question manual of operations was prepared and interviewers trained and certified, to ensure that all the interviewers would interpret the items in a similar manner.

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee at AKU and the Institutional Review Boards of the UAB and RTI. Each subject provided informed consent. WHO ethical and safety guidelines for research in domestic violence were observed (WHO, 2001). To ensure that study participants received appropriate treatment for depression if indicated, we developed a referral mechanism for therapeutic counseling, with utilization of the services at individual discretion.

Participants

LHWs in four selected units of Hyderabad screened 2,205 potentially eligible participants during routine prenatal home visits and 1,659 came to the research clinic. Of these, 1,376 women met the inclusion criteria (20 to 26 weeks of pregnancy as confirmed by ultrasound and confirmation of permanent residence) and 1,369 (99%) gave informed consent to participate in the full study. Exclusions included a clinical diagnosis of a life-threatening condition, and/or plans to deliver outside of the project area.

Measures

Demographics

Demographic variables included the participant's age, level of formal education, any informal education received, employment status, and husband's employment status. Because women in Pakistan are less likely to be employed or own substantial assets, we estimated socioeconomic status using a measure of overall household wealth. This measure, referred to as the household property index, scored the number of the following items owned by any member of the participant's household: home, cultivated land, vehicle, TV, and/or refrigerator. In addition, all participants were asked their number of previous pregnancies and whether the current pregnancy was wanted.

The Aga Khan University Anxiety and Depression Scale (AKUADS)

The AKUADS, developed in the Urdu language, was designed and validated to screen for depression and anxiety in Pakistan (Ali, 1998). The current study utilized the validated 13-item short form of the AKUADS (AKUADS-SF) which omits items on the somatic symptoms from the original scale to improve its diagnostic validity with a pregnant population (Karmaliani, 2007; Karmaliani, 2006). Each AKUADS-SF item has four response options (never, sometimes, often, always) scored from 0 to 3. (See Table 3 for the 13 items evaluated in the AKUADS-SF). Total scores on the scale ranged from 0 to 39 with higher scores indicating more psychological distress. In an earlier study, we assessed the diagnostic validity of the AKUADS-SF, using the psychiatrist-administered Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria for depression and anxiety as the gold standard criterion (see Karmaliani, 2007, for details). Using receiver operating curve analyses, we identified a score of 13 as the most appropriate cut-point for optimizing the sensitivity and specificity of the AKUADS-SF for diagnosing depression/anxiety. Therefore, in the current study we classified those with a score of 13 or higher as meeting the criterion for antenatal depression/anxiety. The Cronbach's alpha for the AKUADS-SF was 0.83 in the current study.

Table 3.

Percentage of Participants Responding “Always” or “Often” to AKUADS-SF Items by History of Domestic Violence

Item All participants % Domestic Violence Prior to Pregnancy
No abuse (N=707) Verbal abuse only (N=408) Physical/sexual abuse (N=208) p
1. Sleeping less 25 22 28 33 .003
2. Lack of interest in daily activities 18 12 25 26 <.001
3. Lost interest in hobbies 15 11 19 20 <. 001
4. Anxious 33 26 37 51 <. 001
5. Sensation of impending doom 9 5 13 17 <. 001
6. Difficulty in thinking clearly 8 4 8 19 <. 001
7. Preferred to be alone 8 5 11 12 <. 001
8. Felt unhappy 14 9 16 26 <. 001
9. Felt hopeless 10 5 14 21 <. 001
10. Felt helpless 10 5 13 22 <. 001
11. Worried 34 23 45 58 <. 001
12. Cried 16 9 22 33 <. 001
13. Thought of taking life 1 1 1 4 .005

Note: p-value based on Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Domestic Violence

As a part of the interview, participants were asked whether they been verbally, physically, or sexually abused in the six months prior to the current pregnancy. Based on responses to these questions, participants were grouped into three levels: (1) no abuse, (2) verbal abuse only and (3) physical and/or sexual abuse. Because of the small percentage of respondents indicating sexual abuse alone and the physical nature of sexual abuse, physical and sexual abuses were combined for analyses.

Statistical Analysis

First, we estimated the prevalence of depression/anxiety among our sample by calculating the percentage of respondents who met the criterion for depression/anxiety based on their AKUADS-SF scores. To examine the magnitude of depression/anxiety among our sample, we also computed the mean and standard deviation for the AKUADS-SF scores.

We then explored differences in prevalence of depression/anxiety according to the following demographic and background characteristics: age, formal education, employment, husband's employment, property index, wanting the current pregnancy, number of previous pregnancies and domestic violence reported during the six months prior to the current pregnancy. Chi-square tests were used for comparisons of whether respondents met the criterion for depression/anxiety while t-tests and analyses of variance were used for comparisons of mean AKUADS-SF scores by demographics.

Finally, we sought to identify the most salient predictors of psychological distress which may be used to target future interventions. We conducted a logistic regression model predicting depression/anxiety based on the demographic and background variables to determine which variables remained significant after controlling for other possible predictors.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Most participants (69%) were between 21 and 30 years of age and 67 percent had some formal education. Twelve percent were employed and 78 percent of their husbands had permanent employment. Fifty-six had households that owned 3 or more of the 5 items included in the property index. Nineteen percent were pregnant for the first time and 60 percent reported that the pregnancy was wanted. About half of the participants (45%) experienced domestic violence in the six months prior to pregnancy with 30 percent reporting verbal abuse only and 15 percent reporting physical and/or sexual abuse.

Table 1.

Prevalence of Depression/Anxiety by Participant Characteristics

Variable Overall Sample
Depression/Anxiety
N % % with Dep/Anx AKUADS-SF Mean (SD)
All participants 1,368 100 18 7.7 (5.7)
Age
 20 years or less 172 13 19 7.6 (6.2)
 21–25 years 480 35 17 7.5 (5.7)
 26–30 years 459 34 18 7.7 (5.5)
 More than 30 years 257 19 20 8.1 (5.9)
Formal education
 10 years or more 467 34 18 7.7 (5.8)
 1–9 years 448 33 19 7.9 (5.7)
 None 453 33 17 7.4 (5.6)
Informal education
 Yes 1,001 73 18 7.8 (5.8)
 No 367 27 18 7.3 (5.5)
Employment
 Employed 167 12 21 8.2 (6.1)
 Not employed 1,199 88 18 7.6 (5.6)
Husband's employmenta,b
 Permanent job 1,073 78 17 7.3 (5.6)
 Temporary/seasonal job 238 17 22 8.7 (5.7)
 No job 54 4 30 9.9 (7.3)
Property indexa,b
 High (3–5 items) 762 56 16 7.2 (5.6)
 Low (0–2 items) 606 44 21 8.2 (5.9)
Number of previous pregnanciesa,b
 0 255 19 21 7.4 (6.0)
 1–2 426 31 14 7.1 (5.3)
 3 or more 686 50 20 8.1 (5.8)
Wanted this pregnancya,b
 Yes 818 60 14 7.0 (5.2)
 No 504 37 24 8.9 (6.3)
Domestic violence within 6 months of this pregnancya,b
 Physical and/or sexual abuse 208 15 42 11.8 (5.8)
 Verbal abuse only 408 30 23 9.0 (5.9)
 No abuse 707 52 8 5.7 (4.6)

Note: Depression/anxiety is defined as an AKUADS-SF score ≥ 13.

a

Mean AKUADS-SF scores varied significantly by characteristic (p < .05) based on analysis of variance

b

Percentage of respondents with depression/anxiety varied significantly (p < .05) based on chi-square test

Table 1 also shows the percent of women with each characteristic that had an AKUADS-SF score of ≥13, the cutoff for a diagnosis of anxiety/depression. Overall, 18% of this population met the cutoff for depression/anxiety. In this univariate analysis, having a husband who was unemployed, having a low property index, a first pregnancy, an unwanted pregnancy, and a history of both verbal and physical and/or sexual abuse all were associated with a AKUADS-SF score of ≥13. Most interestingly, 42 percent of women who experienced physical and/or sexual abuse and 23 percent experiencing verbal only abuse had depression/anxiety compared to 8 percent who reported no abuse. We also evaluated the mean (and standard deviation) of the AKUADS-SF score associated with each characteristic. The overall mean score was 7.7 (5.7). Each of the characteristics associated with a significant increase in the percent of scores ≥ 13 was also associated with a significant increase in the mean score. For example, the mean AKUADS-SF scores increased with increasing severity of abuse. Women reporting no abuse had a mean score of 5.7, while those reporting verbal abuse only had a mean score of 9.0, and those reporting physical and/or sexual abuse had a mean score of 11.8 (p < .001).

Table 2 presents the results of the logistic regression model. After controlling for the other variables in the model, women with 10 or more years of formal education were more often depressed than those without any formal education (OR = 2.01, 1.30 – 3.10) as were women with 1–9 years of formal education (OR = 1.52, 1.03 – 2.25). Women whose husbands had no job were significantly more depressed/anxious (OR = 2.10, 1.07 – 4.12) compared to those whose husbands had a permanent job. In addition, women who had low scores on the property index (two or fewer items owned by their household) were more likely to exhibit depression/anxiety (1.44, 1.04 – 1.99). Women in their first pregnancy were more likely to exhibit depression/anxiety than those who had been pregnant before (OR = 2.31, 1.37 – 3.92). Women who did not want the current pregnancy also were more likely to be depressed/anxious (OR = 1.94, 1.40 – 2.69). In addition, there was a strong relationship between prior domestic violence and depression/anxiety during pregnancy. Women who were physically and/or sexually abused during the six months prior to their pregnancy were far more likely to have depression/anxiety as compared to those who did not experience any abuse (OR = 9.25, 6.11 – 14.00). Similar, but not quite as striking, results were found for women reporting verbal abuse only (OR = 4.04, 2.81 – 5.81). These findings are consistent with the means and prevalence rates shown in Table 1.

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Model of Depression/Anxiety during Pregnancy

Variable OR 95% CI p
Age
 More than 30 years 1.83 0.97, 3.45 .063
 26–30 years 1.24 0.69, 2.20 .475
 21–25 years 1.31 0.77, 2.24 .322
 20 years or less REF
Formal education
 10 years or more 2.01 1.30, 3.10 .002
 1–9 years 1.52 1.03, 2.25 .036
 None REF
Informal education
 Yes 0.94 0.66, 1.35 .748
 No REF
Employment
 Employed 1.12 0.72, 1.75 .609
 Not employed REF
Husband's employment
 Permanent job REF
 Temporary/seasonal job 1.16 0.78, 1.72 .462
 No job 2.10 1.07, 4.12 .032
Property index
 High REF
 Low 1.44 1.04, 1.99 .027
Number of previous pregnancies
 3 or more REF
 1–2 0.78 0.53, 1.16 .221
 0 2.31 1.37, 3.92 .002
Wanted this pregnancy
 Yes REF
 No 1.94 1.40, 2.69 < .001
Domestic violence within 6 months of this pregnancy
 Physical and/or sexual abuse 9.25 6.11, 14.00 < .001
 Verbal abuse only 4.04 2.81, 5.81 < .001
 No abuse REF

Note: N=1,313. AUC = 0.76. REF=reference category.

Given the strong association between history of domestic violence and antenatal psychological distress, we explored the depression and anxiety symptoms reported by women who experienced different levels of abuse, based on responses to the individual AKUADS-SF items. Table 3 presents the percentage of women reporting that they often or always had a specific symptom by level of abuse. The most commonly reported symptoms overall were anxiety (33%), worry (34%), lack of interest in daily activities (18%) and crying (16%). For each symptom, there was a significant trend of greater symptoms according to increasing level of abuse from no abuse to physical/sexual abuse. For example, 58 percent of women who had been physically and/or sexually abused reported that they were often or always worried compared to 45 percent of those who were verbally abused and 23 percent of those who reported no abuse. Similarly about half the women (51%) experiencing physical/sexual abuse and 37 percent experiencing verbal abuse only reported feeling anxious often or always compared to 26 percent who experienced no abuse. Four percent of women who experienced physical/sexual abuse prior to pregnancy thought often or always about taking their own lives compared to one percent of those experiencing no abuse or verbal abuse only.

Discussion

Using the AKUADS-SF scale, we found that nearly 20 percent of our pregnant urban Pakistan population met the criteria for depression/anxiety. These data are comparable to other reports characterizing women's mental health in Pakistan. A study of the general population of women in the northern area of Pakistan using the AKUADS questionnaire found that 17 percent were anxious or depressed (Dodani, 2000). The prevalence of depressive disorders was 25 percent among women from southern Kahuta, Pakistan in the third trimester of pregnancy (Rahman, 2003). Elsewhere in the region, the prevalence of depression was reported at about 16 percent among South Indian women during the third trimester of pregnancy (Chandran, 2002) and among pregnant women in Hong Kong (Leung, 2004).

Although the rates of depressive symptoms in our study are comparable to other data from Pakistan and elsewhere in Asia, the prevalence is low compared to the 25 to 75 percent overall rates of anxiety and depression reported in community surveys in Pakistan (Mumford, 1997; Ali, 1998; Ali, 2000; Husain, 2000). The experience of pregnancy may be different for this cohort of women from Hyderabad, Pakistan which has access to skilled pregnancy care. Hormonal changes during pregnancy may protect them from mood disorders. Local cultural influences may encourage their families to be more supportive and caring towards pregnant women, thus moderating mood disorders. Alternatively, because pregnancy is considered as an experience of celebration in Pakistan, women may inhibit negative feelings and experiences because an unborn child is considered a gift of nature. The prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms may also be affected by the time point during pregnancy at which symptoms are assessed (Bennett, 2004). In our study, women completed the self-report measure at 20–26 weeks, a time window in which depression/anxiety may be lower than later in pregnancy or post-partum.

This study had a number of strengths as well as limitations. Its strengths included the fact that it was community based and included all women whether they sought care in the formal system or delivered at home with a traditional birth attendant. We used a measure of anxiety/depression that had been validated on similar populations of pregnant women, and also took great care to preserve the confidentiality of the subjects. Limitations included the fact the study population was peri-urban and likely had more resources than many Pakistani women. The results therefore may not be generalizable to all Pakistani pregnant women. Also, while the AKUADS-SF scale has been well validated, the data for it and especially for abuse were collected by self report, and there is no way to confirm the accuracy responses. Women who are depressed/anxious may have differential reporting of abuse than other women experiencing the same behavior. Nevertheless, we believe the relationship between abuse and anxiety/depression is strong and likely to be causal.

The majority of the women (87%) in our study were homemakers who had no independent income; an additional 10 percent of the women worked from home. The employment rate (13%) is similar to rates reported previously for the general female population living in urban areas of Pakistan (Social Policy and Development, 2001). Although women's employment status was not significantly associated with depression/anxiety, her husband's unemployment was significantly associated with depression/anxiety. In this society where the husband's income is usually the primary household income, it seems reasonable that depression/anxiety would be closely related to the husband's employment status. These results are also consistent with our findings that lower household wealth was associated with higher levels of depression/anxiety.

Our results also suggest a strong link between level of abuse and magnitude of depression/anxiety, consistent with studies from other developing and developed countries that have found associations between domestic violence and poor mental health during the childbearing period (Campbell, 1995; Ceballo, 2004; Kumar, 2005). In the current study, women who were in an abusive environment during the 6 months before their pregnancy were at greater risk for developing depression/anxiety during pregnancy. Forty-two percent of the women who were physically and/or sexually abused and 23 percent of those who were verbally abused met the criteria for depression/anxiety compared to only 8 percent of those who were not abused. In addition, among those who were physically/sexually abused, four percent said they thought often or always about taking their life, suggesting a significant risk to the mother and her unborn child.

The results of this study suggest that antenatal service providers should routinely screen women for depression and anxiety during pregnancy, just as they routinely screen for other risk factors of potential harm to mothers and infants, with referral offered to appropriate services. The AKUADS-SF provides an effective screening tool that can be easily and quickly administered by clinicians and outreach health workers in Pakistan. Based on a meta-analysis, antenatal depression and anxiety were identified as two of the five strongest predictors of postpartum depression (Robertson, 2004), which in turn has been associated with poor child outcomes. Intervening early may stop this progression and improve maternal and child outcomes.

Given limited health resources in developing countries such as Pakistan, the study results could be used to target interventions to groups that are likely to be at greatest risk for depression/anxiety during pregnancy and require closer monitoring. In particular, we found that women who had been either verbally or physically/sexually abused were at high risk for antenatal depression/anxiety, suggesting that health workers should also screen for abuse as a part of routine prenatal care. Other associated factors associated with depression/anxiety included a first pregnancy, lower socioeconomic status, and an unwanted pregnancy.

Conclusion

A sizable portion of pregnant women in Pakistan experienced depression/anxiety during pregnancy. Further research is needed to assess the relationship of anxiety and depression, especially in the context of abuse, among pregnant women and to determine whether programs aimed at prevention/treatment of depression/anxiety in a Pakistani pregnant population will result in improved sense of well-being and improved health for mothers and their children.

References

  1. Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, Hosli I, Holzgreve W. Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: A risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 2007;20:189–209. doi: 10.1080/14767050701209560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali B, Amanullah S. Prevalence of anxiety and depression in an urban squatter settlement of Karachi. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons - Pakistan. 2000;10:4–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali BS, Reza H, Khan MM, Jehan I. Development of an indigenous screening instrument in Pakistan: The Aga Khan University Anxiety and Depression Scale. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 1998;48(9):261–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allister L, Lester BM, Carr S, Liu J. The effects of maternal depression on fetal heart rate response to vibroacoustic stimulation. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2001;20:639–651. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN2003_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alshuler LL, Hendrick V, Cohen LS. Course of mood and anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1998;59:29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Austin MP, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Leader L, Saint K, Parker G. Maternal trait anxiety, depression and life event stress in pregnancy: relationships with infant temperament. Early Human Development. 2005;81:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;103:698–708. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke L. The impact of maternal relations on familial relationships. International Review of Psychiatry. 2003;15(3):243–55. doi: 10.1080/0954026031000136866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell R, Sullivan CM, Davidson WS. Women who use domestic violence shelters. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1995;19:237–55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carter FA, Carter JD, Luty SE, Wilson DA, Frampton CM, Joyce PR. Screening and treatment for depression during pregnancy: A cautionary note. Australia New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;39:255–61. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ceballo R, Ramirez C, Castillo M, Caballero G, Lozoff B. Domestic Violence and women's mental health in Chile. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2004;28:298–308. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandran M, Tharyan P, Muliyil J, Abraham S. Post partum depression in a cohort of women from rural area of Tamil Nadu India, Incidence and risk factors. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;181:499–504. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.6.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dennis C-L, Ross LE, Grigoriadis S. Psychosocial and psychological intervention for treating antenatal depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007;2007(3):CD006309. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006309.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dieter J, Field TM, Hernandez-Reif MA, Jones NA, Lecanuet JP, Salman FA. Maternal depression and increased fetal activity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2001;21:468–473. doi: 10.1080/01443610120072009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dodani S, Zuberi R. Center-based prevalence of anxiety and depression in women of the Northern Area of Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2000;50(5):138–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fatoye FO, Adeyemi AB, Oladimeji B. Emotional distress and its correlates among Nigerian women in late pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004;24:504–9. doi: 10.1080/01443610410001722518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Field T, Diego M, Dieter J, Hernandez-Reif M, Schanberg S, Kuhn C, Yando R, Bendell D. Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and newborn. Infant Behavior and Development. 2004;27:216–229. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fikree FF, Bhatti LI. Domestic violence and health of Pakistani women. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1999;65(2):195–201. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hathaway JE, Mucci LA, Silverman JG, Brooks DR, Mathews R, Pavlos CA. Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000;19(4):302–7. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00236-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hussain N, Creed F, Tomenson B. Depression and social stress in Pakistan. Psychological Medicine. 2000;30:395–402. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700001707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Karmaliani R, Bann CM, Mahmood MA, Harris H, Akhtar S, Goldenberg RL, Moss N. Measuring antenatal depression and anxiety: Findings from a community-based study of women in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Women and Health. 2006;44(3):79–103. doi: 10.1300/J013v44n03_05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Karmaliani R, Bann CM, Pirani F, Akhtar S, Bender RH, Goldenberg RL, Moss N. Diagnostic validity of two instruments for assessing anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Hyderabad, Pakistan. Health Care Women International. 2007;28(6):556–72. doi: 10.1080/07399330701334562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kataoka Y, Yaju Y, Eto H, Horiuchi S. Domestic violence against women during pregnancy (English abstract) Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2005;52(9):785–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kazi A, Fatmi Z, Hatcher J, Kadir MM, Niaz U, Wasserman GA. Social environment and depression among pregnant women in urban areas of Pakistan: Importance of social relations. Social Science and Medicine. 2006;63:1466–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Khan MM, Reza H. Gender differences in nonfatal suicide behavior in Pakistan: Significance of sociocultural factors. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. Pakistan Journal of Medical Science. 1998;28(1):62–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar S, Jeyaseelan L, Suresh S, Ahuja RC. Domestic violence and its mental health correlates in Indian women. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;187:62–7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Leung S, Martinson IM, Arthur D. Postpartum Depression and Related Psychosocial variables in Hong Kong Chinese Women: Finding from a prospective study. Research Nursing Health. 2004;(28):27–38. doi: 10.1002/nur.20053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mumford DB, Saeed K, Ahmad I, Latif S, Mubbasher MH. Stress and psychiatric disorder in rural Punjab. A community survey. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1997;170:473–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.170.5.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Murray JL, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  30. Niaz U. Women's mental health in Pakistan. World Psychiatry. 2004;3(1):60–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rahman A, Iqbal Z, Harrington R. Life event social support and depression in childbirth. Perspectives from a rural community in the developing world. Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2003;33:1161–7. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703008286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2004:289–95. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rondo PH, Ferreira RF, Nogueira F, Ribeiro MC, Lobert H, Artes R. Maternal psychological stress and distress as predictors of low birth weight, prematurity, and intrauterine growth retardation. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;57(2):266–272. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Social Policy and Development Center . Social development in Pakistan: Annual review 2000. Oxford University Press; Karachi: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  35. World Health Organization . Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2001. WHO/FCH/GWH/01.1. [Google Scholar]
  36. World Health Organization [Accessed December 15, 2004];Mental health: Responding to the call for action. 2002 on the world wide web at: http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA55/ea5518.pdf.

RESOURCES