Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2013 Nov 12;52(23):10.1021/ic402121j. doi: 10.1021/ic402121j

Photochemical Oxidation of a Manganese(III) Complex with Oxygen and Toluene Derivatives to Form a Manganese(V)-Oxo Complex

Jieun Jung , Kei Ohkubo , Katharine A Prokop-Prigge , Heather M Neu , David P Goldberg ‡,*, Shunichi Fukuzumi †,§,*
PMCID: PMC3875180  NIHMSID: NIHMS540066  PMID: 24219426

Abstract

Visible light photoirradiation of an oxygen-saturated benzonitrile solution of a manganese(III) corrolazine complex [(TBP8Cz)MnIII (1): [TBP8Cz = octakis(p-tert-butylphenyl)corrolazinato3−] in the presence of toluene derivatives resulted in formation of the manganese(V)-oxo complex [(TBP8Cz)MnV(O)]. The photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and hexamethylbenzene (HMB) led to the isosbestic conversion of 1 to (TBP8Cz)MnV(O), accompanied by the selective oxidation of HMB to pentamethylbenzyl alcohol (87%). The formation rate of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) increased with methyl group substitution, from toluene, p-xylene, mesitylene, durene, pentamethylbenzene, up to hexamethylbenzene. Deuterium kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) were observed for toluene (KIE = 5.4) and mesitylene (KIE = 5.3). Femtosecond laser flash photolysis of (TBP8Cz)MnIII revealed the formation of a tripquintet excited state, which was rapidly converted to a tripseptet excited state. The tripseptet excited state was shown to be the key, activated state that reacts with O2 via a diffusion-limited rate constant. The data allow for a mechanism to be proposed in which the tripseptet excited state reacts with O2 to give the putative (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), which then abstracts a hydrogen atom from the toluene derivatives in the rate-determining step. The mechanism of hydrogen abstraction is discussed by comparison of the reactivity with the hydrogen abstraction from the same toluene derivatives by cumylperoxyl radical. Taken together, the data suggest a new catalytic method is accessible for the selective oxidation of C-H bonds with O2 and light, and the first evidence for catalytic oxidation of C–H bonds was obtained with 10-methyl-9,10-dihydroacridine as a substrate.

INTRODUCTION

High-valent metal-oxo species are key oxidizing intermediates in a variety of biological oxidation reactions mediated by heme and non-heme metalloenzymes involved in respiration, metabolism, and photosynthesis.1-4 Synthetic high-valent metal-oxo complexes (M(n+2)+(O)) are usually formed by reactions of metal complexes (Mn+) with two-electron oxidants such as iodosylarenes, peroxy acids, and H2O2 [eqn (1)].5-16 However, enzymes such as cytochrome

Mn++H2O2M(n+2)+(O)+H2O (1)

P450 use dioxygen (O2) together with the addition of two electrons and two protons, which is equivalent to H2O2, to generate a high-valent metal-oxo species [eqn (2)].1,2 On the other hand,

Mn++O2+2H++2eM(n+2)+(O)+H2O (2)

high-valent manganese-oxo species are implicated in the water oxidation mechanism of Photosystem II, and may involve the formal two-electron oxidation of a H2O molecule by a tetranuclear manganese complex to give high-valent Mn(O) intermediates.4,5 Synthetic high-valent metal-oxo complexes have also been reported to be formed by two-electron oxidation of metal complexes with H2O as the oxygen source [eqn (3)].17-23

Mn++H2O2H+2eM(n+2)+(O) (3)

There have been comparatively few reports on the formation of discrete, high-valent metal-oxo complexes using O2.24-26 The activation of O2 and stabilization of high-valent metal-oxo species is challenging to carry out in a single ligand environment. Porphyrinoid ligands, and in particular corroles and corrolazines (Czs), are designed to stabilize high-valent species including high-valent metal-oxo complexes, and there are examples of CrV(O) corroles generated from O2.27 It has recently been reported that the oxidation of a MnIII corrolazine complex with O2 in cyclohexane or toluene as solvent under visible light irradiation leads to the quantitative production of a well-characterized, isolabe MnV(O) complex.28 Relatively short-lived metal-oxo species have been generated by photo-initiated homolytic axial ligand cleavage reactions with metalloporphyrins, as well as photochemical splitting of metalloporphyrin μ-oxo dimers.29,30 However, to our knowledge the former photo-initiated reaction involving MnIII(Cz) is the first example of the production of a well-defined MnV(O) species from O2.

In the former study, the combined data suggested a mechanism for the generation of MnV(O)(Cz) that involved solvent-assisted autoxidation, in which the solvent (cyclohexane or toluene) served as a sacrificial reductant for the activation and cleavage of a putative photactivated Mn-O2 intermediate. The nature of the photoexcited state, and the product(s) of solvent oxidation were not identified in this study. The proposed mechanism suggested that, perhaps under conditions involving an inert solvent, the controlled oxidation of substrates such as toluene derivatives could be mediated by MnIII(Cz)/O2/light.

We report herein the use of benzonitrile (PhCN) as an inert solvent for the reaction of the MnIII complex [(TBP8Cz)MnIII: TBP8Cz = octakis(p-tert-butylphenyl)corrolazinato3−] with O2 under visible light irradiation. The conversion of (TBP8Cz)MnIII to (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) does not occur in PhCN in the absence of a proton/electron source, but with the addition of a series of toluene derivatives as substrates the smooth production of the MnV(O) complex is observed. The concommitant oxidation of the toluene derivatives occurs with high selectivity and efficiency, leading to monohydroxylation of a benzylic position. Femtosecond laser flash photolysis (LFP) measurements resulted in the spectroscopic observation of a short-lived, O2-reactive (TBP8Cz)MnIII excited state. The LFP experiments, together with product analyses and kinetic measurements, including kinetic deuterium isotope effects, provide valuable insights into the mechanism of generation of the MnV(O) complex by the photochemical oxidation of the MnIII complex using O2 as an oxygen source and toluene derivatives as the source of protons and electrons.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials

The starting material (TBP8Cz)MnIII was synthesized according to published procedures.31 The commercially available reagents (p-xylene, mesitylene, durene, pentamethylbenzene, and hexamethylbenzene) were purchased with the best available purity and used without further purification. Toluene and benzonitrile (PhCN) were dried according to literature procedures32 and distilled under Ar prior to use. The reagents 2,3,4,5,6-pentamethylbenzyl alcohol and pentamethylbenzaldehyde were also purchased with the best available purity and used without further purification from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. and Tokyo Kasei Co., Ltd, respectively. Di-tert-butylperoxide was purchased from Nacalai Tesque Co., Ltd. and purified by chromatography through alumina, which removes traces of the hydroperoxide. 10-Methyl-9,10-dihydroacridine (AcrH2) was prepared from 10-methylacridinium perchlorate (AcrH+ClO4−) by reduction with NaBH4 in methanol and purified by recrystallization from ethanol.33 Cumene was purchased from Tokyo Kasei Co., Ltd. and also purified by chromatography through alumina. Deuterated toluene and mesitylene were purchased from Cambridge Isotopes in the highest purity and used as received.

Product Analysis

A PhCN solution of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (5.0 × 10−4 M) was added with a microsyringe into an O2-saturated PhCN solution containing hexamethylbenzene (2.0 × 10−2 M) as a substrate in a quartz cell. A rather large concentration of (TBP8Cz)MnIII was employed to obtain detectable amounts of products by GC-MS. The mixture of the reaction was filled with O2 and then irradiated for 24 h at room temperature, when the solution changed from the green-brown color indicative of (TBP8Cz)MnIII to the bright-green color of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O). Complete conversion of (TBP8Cz)MnIII to (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) was confirmed by UV-vis spectroscopy by sampling an aliquot of the reaction mixture. An aliquot was removed and injected directly into the GC-MS for analysis. All peaks of interest were identified by comparison of retention times and co-injection with authentic samples. Compounds were quantified by comparison against a known amount of detected products using a calibration curve consisting of a plot of mole versus area. Calibration curves were prepared by using concentrations in the same range as that observed in the actual reaction mixtures. Mass spectra were recorded with a JEOL JMS-700T Tandem MS station, and the GC-MS analyses were carried out by using a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2000 gas chromatograph mass spectrometer. GC-MS conditions in these experiments were performed as follows: an initial oven temperature of 60 °C was held for 1 min and then raised 30 °C min−1 for 7.3 min until a temperature of 280 °C was reached, which was then held for further 10 min. This experiment was repeated three times, exhibiting error in yields within 10%.

Spectral and Kinetic Measurements

The photochemical oxidations of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (7.6 × 10−6 M) with excess O2 were examined by monitoring UV-vis spectral changes in the presence of a large excess of toluene derivatives (2.0 × 10−2 to 9.4 M) at 298 K using a Hewlett-Packard HP8453 diode array spectrophotometer under continuous irradiation of white light from a Shimadzu RF-5300PC fluorescence spectrophotometer at the same time. Typically, an aerated PhCN solution of (TBP8Cz)MnIII was added with a microsyringe to an aerated PhCN solution containing the toluene derivatives in a quartz cell (total vol. 2.0 mL). Rates of oxidation reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnIII to produce (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) were monitored by the decrease in the absorption band due to (TBP8Cz)MnIII (λmax = 695 nm, εmax = 3.51 × 104 M−1 cm−1). The concentration of toluene derivatives were maintained in large excess as compared to [(TBP8Cz)MnIII] for all kinetic measurements. The limiting concentration of O2 in PhCN solution was prepared by a mixed gas flow of O2 and N2. The mixed gas was controlled by using a gas mixer (Kofloc GB-3C, KOJIMA Instrument Inc.), which can mix two or more gases at a certain pressure and flow rate.

Quantum Yield Determination

A standard actinometer (potassium ferrioxalate)34 was used for the quantum yield determination of the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and toluene derivatives in O2-saturated PhCN. Typically, a square quartz cuvette (10 mm i.d.), which contained an O2-saturated PhCN solution (2.0 mL) of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (7.6 × 10−6 M) and a toluene derivative was irradiated with monochromatic light of λ = 450 nm from a Shimadzu RF-5300PC fluorescence spectrophotometer. Under the conditions of actinometry experiments, the actinometer and (TBP8Cz)MnIII absorbed essentially all of the incident light at λ = 450 nm. The light intensity of monochromatized light at λ = 450 nm was determined to be 3.7 × 10−8 einstein s−1. The quantum yields were determined by monitoring the disappearance of absorbance at 695 nm due to (TBP8Cz)MnIII.

Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

The photocatalytic reactivity of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (1.7 × 10−4 M) with excess of O2 was examined by monitoring the UV-vis spectral changes in the presence of a large excess of AcrH2 (0.2 M) in a quartz cell (optical path length 1 mm) using a Xe lamp (500 W) for irradiation through a transmitting glass filter (λ > 480 nm) at room temperature. In a typical experiment, (TBP8Cz)MnIII (1.7 × 10−4 M) was dissolved in PhCN (0.5 mL) containing excess AcrH2 (0.2 M). The solution was purged with O2 gas for 10 min in the quartz cell, and then the reaction was initiated by irradiating the solution with a Xe lamp (500 W) transmitting through a glass filter (λ > 480 nm). The UV-vis spectra of the solution were measured using a Hewlett-Packard HP8453 diode array spectrophotometer every 1 h. The amount of 10-methyl-(9,10H)-acridinone (Acr=O) produced was quantified by an increase in the absorption band due to Acr=O (λ = 402 nm, εmax = 8.6 × 103 M−1 cm−1 in PhCN).

Femtosecond Laser Flash Photolysis Measurements

Measurements of transient absorption spectra in the oxidation reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnIII were performed according to the following procedures. An O2- or N2-saturated PhCN solution containing (TBP8Cz)MnIII (6.8 × 10−5 M) was excited using an ultrafast source, Integra-C (Quantronix Corp.), an optical parametric amplifier, TOPAS (Light Conversion Ltd.), and a commercially available optical detection system, Helios provided by Ultrafast Systems LLC. The source for the pump and probe pulses were derived from the fundamental output of Integra-C (λ = 786 nm, 2 mJ/pulse and fwhm = 130 fs) at a repetition rate of 1 kHz. 75% of the fundamental output of the laser was introduced into a second harmonic generation (SHG) unit: Apollo (Ultrafast Systems) for excitation light generation at λ = 393 nm, while the rest of the output was used for white light generation. The laser pulse was focused on a sapphire plate of 3 mm thickness and then white light continuum covering the visible region from λ = 410 nm to 800 nm was generated via self-phase modulation. A variable neutral density filter, an optical aperture, and a pair of polarizer were inserted in the path in order to generate stable white light continuum. Prior to generating the probe continuum, the laser pulse was fed to a delay line that provides an experimental time window of 3.2 ns with a maximum step resolution of 7 fs. In our experiments, a wavelength at λ = 393 nm of SHG output was irradiated at the sample cell with a spot size of 1 mm diameter where it was merged with the white probe pulse in a close angle (< 10 °). The probe beam after passing through the 2 mm sample cell was focused on a fiber optic cable that was connected to a CMOS spectrograph for recording the time-resolved spectra (λ = 410-800 nm). Typically, 1500 excitation pulses were averaged for 3 seconds to obtain the transient spectrum at a set delay time. Kinetic traces at appropriate wavelengths were assembled from the time-resolved spectral data. The decay rate of the tripquintet (5T1) obeyed the first-order kinetics given by eqn (4) where A1 and A2 are pre-

ΔAbs=A1exp(k1t)+A2 (4)

exponential factors for the absorbance changes and k1 is the rate constant of the decay of the tripquintet (5T1) after irradiation. The slower decay rate of the tripseptet (7T1) also obeyed the first-order kinetics given by eqn (5), where A3 is the final absorbance at 774 nm and k2 is the rate

ΔAbs=A1exp(k1t)+A2exp(k2t)+A3 (5)

constant of the decay of 7T1. All measurements were conducted at room temperature, 298 K.

EPR Measurements

Photoirradiation of an oxygen-saturated PhCN solution containing di-tert-butylperoxide (1.0 M) and cumene (1.0 M) with a 1000 W mercury lamp (Ushio-USH1005D) through an aqueous filter resulted in formation of cumylperoxyl radical (g = 2.0156).35 The EPR spectra were measured with a JEOL X-band spectrometer (JES-RE1XE). The ESR spectra were recorded under non-saturating microwave power conditions. The magnitude of modulation was chosen to optimize the resolution and the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of the observed spectra. The g value was calibrated by using a Mn2+ marker. Upon cutting off the light irradiated through a window directly, the decay of the EPR intensity was recorded with time. The decay rates were accelerated by the presence of toluene derivatives, indicating hydrogen atom transfer occurred. Rates of hydrogen atom transfer from toluene derivatives to cumylperoxyl radical were monitored by measuring the decay of the EPR signal in the presence of various concentrations of toluene derivatives in propionitrile at −80 °C. Pseudo-first-order rate constants were determined by a least-squares curve fitting procedure. The first-order plots of ln(II) vs time (I and I are the EPR intensity at time t and the final intensity, respectively) were linear for three or more half-lives with the correlation coefficient, ρ > 0.99. Plot of the pseudo-first-order rate constants against the substrate concentrations gave linear lines.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Photochemical Oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and Toluene Derivatives

The photochemical generation of a MnV(O) complex using O2 as an oxygen source was performed by photoirradiation of an aerated PhCN solution containing a MnIII complex [(TBP8Cz)MnIII] and toluene derivatives (Scheme 1). Monitoring this reaction by UV-vis spectroscopy revealed the transformation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (λmax = 695 nm, εmax = 3.51 × 104 M−1 cm−1) to the MnV(O) complex [(TBP8Cz)MnV(O)] (λmax = 634 nm, εmax = 2.0 × 104 M−1 cm−1)28 with isosbestic points as shown in Figure 1. No further reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) with toluene occurred for another 1 hour (Figure S1 in Supporting Information (SI)), as expected from previous work.28,36 No formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) was observed in the absence of O2 or toluene derivatives, indicating both toluene derivatives and O2 are certainly required to generate (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) (Figure S2 and S3 in SI).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) from (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and Toluene Derivatives under Photoirradiation (White Light)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) UV-vis spectral changes and (b) time profiles of absorption changes at λ = 695 nm and 634 nm for the photochemical oxidation reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (7.6 × 10−6 M) under irradiation (white light) in an aerobic solution of PhCN containing hexamethylbenzene (0.08 M) as a substrate at room temperature.

The photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and hexamethylbenzene to produce (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) is accompanied by the oxidation of hexamethylbenzene. Analysis of the reaction mixture by GC-MS reveals the major product of oxidation to be the pentamethylbenzyl alcohol in 87% yield (based on total Mn content), along with a small amount of pentamethylbenzaldehyde (8%) (see Figures S4 – S5, and Table S1 in SI). Thus the oxidation of hexamethylbenzene occurs with high selectivity, and the stoichiometry of the main reaction is given by eqn (6).

(TBP8Cz)MnIII+O2+C6Me6nv(TBP8Cz)MnV(O)+C6Me5CH2OH (6)

Kinetics

Rates of formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) in the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 in the air and toluene derivatives were determined from the decay of absorbance at 695 nm due to (TBP8Cz)MnIII in aerated PhCN at 298 K. The zeroth-order rate constant (kobs) was determined from the initial rate in Figure 1b in order to avoid the decrease in the light intensity absorbed by (TBP8Cz)MnIII in the course of the photochemical reaction. The kobs values were derived from the initial slopes of the plots of [(TBP8Cz)MnIII] vs time for the different substrates, as shown in Figures S6 − S11 (see Supporting Information). The observed rate constants are proportional to concentrations of substrates, as shown in Figure 2 (see Supporting Information for separate Figures in Figure S12). The rates are also proportional to concentration of O2 (Figure 3). Thus, the rate law is given by eqn (7), where kox is a second-order

d[(TBP8Cz)MnIII]dt=kox[S][O2] (7)

Supporting Information for separate Figures in Figure S12). The rates are also proportional to concentration of O2 (Figure 3). Thus, the rate law is given by eqn (7), where kox is a second-order rate constant and [S] is substrates concentration. The slope of the best-fit lines for the kobs values for the different substrates in Figure 2 yield first-order rate constants with respect to substrate concentration. These values can then be divided by the excess O2 concentration (1.7 × 10−3 M) to give the second-order rate constants (kox) listed in Table 1. Interestingly, the second-order rate constants increase with an increasing number of methyl groups in the substrate. A dramatic 200- fold rate enhancement is observed in the presence of hexamethylbenzene over toluene.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Plots of the observed zeroth-order rate constants (kobs) of the oxidation reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (7.6 × 10−6 M) under irradiation (white light) of an aerated PhCN solution containing toluene (red, 1.0 to 8.2 M), p-xylene (orange, 1.0 to 4.0 M), mesitylene (green, 0.5 to 2.0 M), durene (blue, 0.1 to 0.4 M), pentamethylbenzene (purple, 2.0 × 10−2 to 1.0 × 10−1 M) or hexamethylbenzene (black, 2.0 × 10−2 to 1.0 × 10−1 M) as a substrate at 298 K.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plot of the observed zeroth-order rate constants (kobs) for the oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (7.6 × 10−6 M) with O2 and hexamethylbenzene (0.10 M) under photoirradiation M) (white light) in PhCN vs the oxygen concentration (0 − 8.5 × 10−3 M)37 at 298 K.

Table 1.

Second-Order Rate Constants for the Oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (kox) by O2 with Toluene Derivatives in Aerated PhCN at 298 K and for the Hydrogen-Atom Transfer from Toluene Derivatives to Cumylperoxyl Radicals (kH) in Aerated Propionitrile at 193 K

substrate kox, M−1 s−1 kH, M−1 s−1
toluene (4.0 ± 0.4) × 10−7 (6.5 ± 0.2) × 10−3
p-xylene (1.1 ± 0.3) × 10−7 (8.3 ± 0.3) × 10−3
mesitylene (2.7 ± 0.1) × 10−6 (9.2 ± 0.4) × 10−3
durene (1.2 ± 0.4) × 10−6 (2.3 ± 0.1) × 10−2
pentamethylbenzene (3.6 ± 0.1) × 10−5 (4.7 ± 0.2) × 10−2
hexamethylbenzene (8.0 ± 0.2) × 10−5 (1.3 ± 0.1) × 10−1

When toluene (2.0 M) was replaced with its deuterated analog (C6D5CD3), the reaction rate of formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) with O2 became significantly slower as shown in Figure 4a (blue for C6H5CH3 and red for C6D5CD3). The deuterium kinetic isotope effect (KIE) for toluene was determined to be 5.4. A similar KIE was obtained for the case of mesitylene (KIE = 5.3) as shown in Figure 4b (blue for mesitylene and red for mesitylene-d12). The bond-dissociation energy of the aryl C-H for benzene (109.8 kcal mol−1) is over 20 kcal mol−1 higher than the methyl C-H for toluene (87.2 kcal mol−1).38 Thus H-atom abstraction from the methyl C-H is dramatically favored, and it is reasonable to expect that H-atom transfer from the methyl C-H occurs rather than from the aryl C-H. In fact, the photochemical reaction of benzene showed negligible formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) (Figure S13 in SI). The fact that the methyl group of hexamethylbenzene was oxygenated to yield pentamethylbenzyl alcohol provides additional evidence for this mechanism. Thus the KIE value corresponds to that of H-atom transfer from the methyl C-H rather than the aryl C-H. Taken together, the findings of increasing reaction rate with increasing the number of abstractable hydrogen atoms along with the observed large KIEs suggest that hydrogen-atom abstraction from the toluene derivative is directly involved in the rate-determining step for the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and toluene derivatives.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Time dependence of photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII (8.0 × 10−6 M) with (a) M) C6H5CH3 (blue, 2.0 M), C6D5CD3 (red, 2.0 M), (b) mesitylene (blue, 2.0 M), or mesitylene-d12 (red, 2.0 M) under irradiation (white light) in O2-saturated PhCN at 298 K.

Femtosecond Transient Absorption Measurements

In order to detect the photoexcited state involved in the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2, the femtosecond laser flash photolysis measurements of (TBP8Cz)MnIII were performed in the absence and presence of O2 in PhCN. The MnIII metal ion has a high spin d4 ground state electronic configuration (S = 2) with only the high energy dx2-y2 orbital unoccupied in the ground state.39 Because of the coupling between unpaired electrons of the metal with the π electrons of the corrolazine ring, the ground state of (TBP8Cz)MnIII is a singquintet (5S0). Upon femtosecond laser excitation, instantaneously formed minima at λmin = 450 and 695 nm can be observed as shown in Figure 5a which closely mirror the ground-state absorption spectrum (Figure 1a). A new absorption maximum at λmax = 530 nm is also formed and can be assigned to the tripquintet (5T1) excited state. It is known that first row paramagnetic complexes, such as MnIII complexes, undergo an extremely rapid intersystem crossing process from the singquintet (5S1) excited state to the tripquintet (5T1) excited state due to the presence of unpaired electrons.40 In MnIII porphyrins, for example, the existence of two tripmultiplet levels was suggested where a tripquintet (5T1) relaxes to a long-lived tripseptet (7T1), which requires a spin conversion to go back to the quintet ground state.40,41 In the Mn corrolazine complex, we attribute the decay of the absorbance band at 530 nm to intersystem crossing from the 5T1 state to the 7T1 state, which has a small absorption band at 774 nm. The decay rate of the tripquintet (5T1) obeyed first-order 7 8 kinetics with a rate constant of 1.8 × 1010 s−1 in deaerated PhCN (Figure 5b). The similar decay 9 10 rate constant was observed in O2-saturated PhCN (Figure 5c) showing no oxygen dependence on 11 12 the rate of intersystem crossing.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Transient absorbance spectral changes (purple after 1 ps, blue 10 ps, green 100 ps, III orange 1000 ps, and red 3000 ps) after photoexcitation of (TBP8Cz)Mn in PhCN. Time profile of the generation and decay of [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (5T ) at λ = 530 nm under (b) N and (c) O . The −3 red lines are exponential fitting given in eqn (4) (see Experimental Section). A1 = 3.3 × 10 A2 = 1.5 × 10−4, and k (c).

The absorbance at 774 nm due to 7T1 remained unchanged up to 3000 ps in deaerated PhCN (Figure 6b), whereas the absorbance decays in O2-saturated PhCN (Figure 6c), signaling a direct reaction between the excited state and O2. The second-order rate constant of the decay of [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) in the presence of O2 was determined to be 4.9 × 109 M−1 s−1, which is comparable to the diffusion-limited rate constant in PhCN.42 Because the one-electron oxidation potential of [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) (−0.90 V vs SCE)43-45 is more negative than the one-electon reduction potential of O2 (−0.87 V vs SCE),46 electron transfer from [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) to O2 may occur efficiently to produce the Mn(IV)-superoxo complex, (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−).47

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Transient absorbance spectral changes (purple after 1 ps, blue 10 ps, green 100 ps, III orange 1000 ps, and red 3000 ps) after photoexcitation of (TBP8Cz)Mn in PhCN. Decay time profiles of absorbace at 774 nm due to [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T ) (b) in N-saturead PhCN and (c) in O2-saturated PhCN. Best-fit lines (red) obtained from a double-exponential kinetic model given in eqn (5) (see Experimental Section). A1 = 1.4 × 10, A2 = 6.7 × 10 A3 = 3.6 × 10 k1 = 4.8 × 109 k = 6.3 × 107 for (b) and A = 1.0 × 10−3, A = 1.1 × 10−3, A = -4.5 × 10−4, k= 5.0 × 109 and k = 1.1 × 108 for (c).

An alternative mechanism could involve direct energy transfer from [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) to O2 to produce singlet oxygen (1O2*) and the ground state (TBP8Cz)MnIII (S = 2), which is a spin- allowed process. In the initial report on the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII to (TBP8Cz)MnV(O), a significant role for singlet oxygen was ruled out by use of the 1O2* trap, 9,10-dimethylanthracene.28 However, to eliminate the possibility of 1O2* as the major oxidant under inert solvent conditions as employed in the present study, we looked for the presence of 1O2* by its phosphorescence spectrum (λmax = 1270 nm).37,48 The photoexcitation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII in O2-saturated C6D6 (PhCN could not be used because of the short lifetime of 1O2) results in a much smaller phosphorescence signal at 1270 nm than that obtained by photoexcitation of C60 under the same conditions.49 (see Figure S12 in SI) Thus, the contribution of 1O2* for the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 may be negligible as compared with an electron-transfer pathway from [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) to O2.

Reaction Mechanism

Based on the photodynamics of (TBP8Cz)MnIII, together with the effect of added substrate and the large observed KIEs, the mechanism of photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and toluene as the substrate to produce (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) is proposed as shown in Scheme 2. Upon photoexcitation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII, the produced tripquintet excited state ([(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (5T1)) is converted rapidly by intersystem crossing to the triplet excited state ([(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1)). Electron transfer from [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) to O2 occurs to produce the superoxo complex [(TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−)]. Hydrogen-atom transfer from toluene to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−) then follows as the rate-determining step, generating thehydroperoxo complex (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH) and benzyl radical. This reaction is most likely in competition with the back-reaction of electron transfer to regenerate the ground state (TBP8Cz)MnIII and O2. The subsequent homolytic O−O bond cleavage by benzyl radical may occur rapidly inside the reaction cage before the reaction of benzyl radical with O2 to yield (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) and benzyl alcohol (an oxygen rebound pathway). Alternatively, electron transfer may occur from benzyl radical derivatives to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH) to produce an ion pair {(TBP8Cz)MnIII(OOH)} and benzyl cation (PhCH2)+, followed by heterolytic O−O bond cleavage to yield (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) and benzyl alcohol derivatives. At present the homolysis vs heterolysis pathway has yet to be distinguished.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Mechanism of Photochemical Oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and Toluene for Generation of (TBP8Cz)Mnv (O)

According to Scheme 2, the quantum yield of formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) is given by eqn (8), where Φ0 is the quantum yield of photoinduced formation of (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2*−), kH is the

Φ=Φ0(kHket)(kH+ket))[S][O2] (8)

rate of hydrogen-atom transfer from toluene derivatives (S) to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), ket is the rate constant of electron transfer from [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) to O2 to produce (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), and k-et is the back electron transfer from the O2•− moiety to the (TBP8Cz)MnIV moiety to regenerate (TBP8Cz)MnIII and O2. Eqn (8) agrees with the empirical rate law [eqn (7)], in which kox = Φ0(kHket/(kH + k-et))In (In = light intensity absorbed by (TBP8Cz)MnIII).50 Because significant KIEs were observed, as shown in Figure 4, the kH value may be much smaller than the k-et value: kH << k-et, suggesting the back electron transfer pathway is much more favored.

The mechanism in Scheme 2 is similar to O2 activation by [(TMC)FeII]2+ (TMC = 1,4,8,11- tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) with a hydrogen donor (RH) to produce [(TMC)FeIV(O)]2+. In this case, electron transfer from [(TMC)FeII]2+ to O2 occurs thermally to produce [(TMC)FeIII(O2•−)]2+. This is followed by hydrogen transfer from RH to [(TMC)FeIII(O2•−)]2+ to give R and [(TMC)FeIII-(OOH)]2+, which undergoes an oxygen rebound reaction via the homolytic O-O bond cleavage by R to yield [(TMC)FeIV(O)]2+ and ROH. 51

If a free radical (e.g., pentamethylbenzyl radical) were produced following hydrogen-atom transfer from a toluene derivative to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), the benzyl radical should react with O2 to produce the peroxyl radical, which may act as a chain carrier for the autoxidation of hexamethylbenzene to produce pentamethylbenzyl hydroperoxide. The disproportionation of the peroxyl radical may yield equimolar pentamethylbenzyl alcohol and pentamethylbenzaldehyde. The fact that neither pentamethylbenzyl hydroperoxide nor pentamethylbenzaldehyde were produced and that pentamethylbenzyl alcohol was the major product, provides strong evidence for the conclusion that the rebound pathway to produce pentamethylbenzyl alcohol is faster than the rate of the reaction of pentamethylbenzyl radical with O2. Judging from the reported rate constant of benzyl radical with O2 (2.6 × 109 M−1 s−1)52 to produce benzyl peroxyl radical, and the O2 concentration (8.5 mM) of the reaction mixture, the lifetime of the radical is expected to be shorter than 45 ns = (2.6 × 109 × 8.5 × 10−3)−1. The lifetime of (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH) is also expected to be shorter than 45 ns. In such a case, it is very difficult to detect (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH), because this is a high energy species, which goes back to (TBP8Cz)MnIII, O2 and H+.53,54

Comparison of Hydrogen Transfer Reactivity

In order to gain deeper insight into the rate-determining hydrogen transfer from toluene derivatives to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), the reactivity was compared with that of hydrogen transfer from the same toluene derivatives employed in this study to cumylperoxyl radical, which is regarded as an authentic hydrogen-transfer reaction.35,55,56 The rates of hydrogen transfer from toluene derivatives to cumylperoxyl radical were determined by monitoring the reactions by EPR spectroscopy. Cumylperoxyl radicals were generated by photoirradiation of an aerated propionitrile solution containing di- tert-butylperoxide (tBuOOtBu) and cumene [PhCH(CH3)2] with a 1000 W Mercury lamp via a radical chain process as shown in Scheme 3.35 The UV light irradiation of tBuOOtBu results in the O−O bond cleavage to produce tBuO. This radical can then readily abstract a hydrogen from cumene to generate cumyl radical [PhC (CH3)2]. Rapid O2 addition to the cumyl radical affords the cumylperoxyl radical (PhC(CH3)2OO). Once generated, this autoxidation process continues until cumylperoxyl radicals decay via β-scission producing acetophenone and CH3O.57

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Generation of Cumylperoxyl Radical and Hydrogen Transfer from Toluene to PhCMe2OO*

After cutting off the light, the decay rates of cumylperoxyl radical were monitored by the decrease of EPR signal intensity at g = 2.0156 in the presence of a toluene derivative in propionitrile at 193 K, as shown in Figure 7. The decay rates of cumylperoxyl radical obeyed first-order kinetics under the conditions with large excess toluene derivatives.58 The pseudo-first-order rate constants (k’obs) were linearly proportional to concentrations of toluene derivatives as shown in Figure 8. The second-order rate constants (kH) of the hydrogen atom transfer from toluene derivatives to cumylperoxyl radicals were determined from the slopes of linear plots in Figure 8. The kH values are also listed in Table 1. The decay rates of cumylperoxyl radical in the presence of a toluene derivative become faster than in the absence of the toluene derivative.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Time profiles of the EPR intensity change of cumylperoxyl radical in the absence (black line) and presence of toluene as a substrate (3 M, blue line) in aerated propionitrile at 193 K.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Plots of kobs vs concentrations of toluene derivatives for hydrogen-atom transfer from toluene derivatives to cumylperoxyl radical in aerated propionitrile at 193 K.

These results suggest that hydrogen-atom transfer from the toluene derivative to cumylperoxyl radical readily occurs. Figure 9 shows plots of the logarithm of the kox values of the photochemical oxidation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 in the presence of toluene derivatives and the kH values of hydrogen-atom transfer from toluene derivatives to cumylperoxyl radicals vs the one-electron oxidation peak potentials of the toluene derivatives (Epox), which were reported previously.59 There is a linear correlation between log kox and Epox with a larger slope (3.2) than that between log kH and Epox (1.7) in Figure 9. The slopes of 3.2 and 1.7 correspond to 19% (3.2/16.9) and 7% (2.2/26.0) of the difference in the free energy change of electron transfer, because the difference in 1 V of Eox corresponds to the difference in terms of logarithm of the rate constant to be 2.3RT = 26.0 and 16.9 at 193 and 298 K, respectively. The kH value of hexamethylbenzene increases by a factor of 20 as compared with that of toluene, while the number of hydrogen atoms increases by a factor of 6. Thus, a small ca. 3-fold “net” increase was observed in the rates of cumylperoxyl radical decay rate in the presence of hexamethylbenzene compared to its reaction with toluene. In general, the kH value is expected to increase with decreasing the C−H bond dissociation energies of toluene derivatives.60 However, the C-H bond dissociation energies of toluene derivatives have been reported to be only slightly affected by the electron-donating or –withdrawing subsitituents.61 The small “net” difference in the hydrogen-transfer reactivity of cumylperoxyl radical with hexamethylbenzene vs toluene results from the small change in the C-H bond dissociation energies of toluene derivatives. The larger slope (3.2) in the plot of log kox vs Epox than the slope (1.7) in the plot of log kH and Epox in Figure 9 indicates the higher degree of charge transfer in the transition state of the hydrogen-transfer reactions of (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−) as compared with those of cumylperoxyl radical, as reported for the linear relations between logarithm of the rate constants of hydrogen-transfer reactions of triplet excited state of acetophenone derivatives and the ionization potentials of hydrogen donors.62

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Plots of log k and log k’ against the oxidation potential (Ep ) of toluene derivatives III for hydrogen-atom transfer with (a) (TBP8Cz)Mn and (b) cumylperoxyl radical.

Photocatalytic Reactivity with AcrH2

The photocatalytic reactivity of (TBP8Cz)MnIII was examined under irradiation (white light) of a reaction solution (0.5 mL) containing (TBP8Cz)MnIII (1.7 × 10−4 M) and AcrH2 (0.2 M) which has a weaker C-H bond than toluene derivatives. The time course for formation of Acr=O as the product quantified by absorbance at 402 nm (λ = 402 nm, εmax = 8.6 × 103 M−1 cm−1)63 is shown in Figure 10a. The turnover number was determined to be 11 in 5 hours based on the initial amount of (TBP8Cz)MnIII. A negligible amount of Acr=O was produced from a reaction solution without (TBP8Cz)MnIII as a control experiment.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

(a) UV-vis spectral changes and (b) time course of formed Acr=O under III photoirradiation (λ > 480 nm) of an aerobic solution (0.5 mL) containing (TBP8Cz)Mn (1.7 × 10−4 M) and AcrH (blue, 0.2 M) or AcrD2 (red, 0.2 M).

When AcrH2 was replaced by the dideuterated compound AcrD2, the photocatalytic reactivity dramatically decreased with a large kinetic deuterium isotope (KIE) value of 16 as shown in Figure 10b (blue for AcrH2 and red for AcrD2).64 This KIE suggests that hydrogen-atom transfer from AcrH2 to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−) is involved in the rate-determining step as seen in the case of toluene derivatives in Scheme 2. This hydrogen transfer may also proceed via electron transfer from AcrH2 to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−), followed by rate-limiting proton transfer from AcrH2•+ to (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O22−) to produce AcrH and (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH). As seen for the toluene derivatives, oxygen rebound via homolytic O−O bond cleavage by AcrH yields (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) and AcrHOH. The electron-donating OH group in AcrHOH may make it easier to be oxidized by (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) as compared to AcrH2 via electron and proton transfer, yielding Acr=O and regenerating (TBP8Cz)MnIII (Scheme 4). The stoichiometry of the photocatalytic reaction is given by eqn (9). The slow catalytic oxidation of AcrH2 may result from the much faster back electron transfer in (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−) as compared with the hydrogen-transfer reaction with AcrH2 in Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Mechanism of Photocatalytic Reaction of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and AcrH2

graphic file with name nihms-540066-f0013.jpg (9)

CONCLUSIONS

Photoirradiation of (TBP8Cz)MnIII with O2 and toluene derivatives in the inert solvent PhCN results in the rare formation of a high-valent manganese(V)-oxo complex with O2 as the oxidant. At the same time, the substrate hexamethylbenzene is selectively oxidized in good yield to a single, mono-hydroxylated benzyl alcohol product. The photochemical mechanism was interrogated by femtosecond laser flash photolysis measurements, leading to the first direct spectroscopic observation of a novel photo-excited state ([(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1)), which was found to be responsible for the initial reaction with O2. The LFP experiments, together with kinetic studies involving substrate dependence and KIEs, indicate that the mechanism of photochemical oxidation involves the short-lived 7T1 excited state reacting with O2 via binding and electron-transfer to produce the proposed superoxo complex (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−). The superoxo complex then abstracts a hydrogen atom from the toluene derivatives in the rate- determining step to produce (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2H), followed by oxygen rebound of the resulting benzyl radical derivatives with (TBP8Cz)MnIV(OOH) to yield the corresponding benzyl alcohol derivatives and (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) (Scheme 2). The hydrogen-atom abstracting reactivity of cumylperoxyl radical was examined with the same set of toluene derivatives, and comparison of the kinetic data confirmed that H-atom abstraction was the rate-determining step for the Mn complex, and indicated that the putative (TBP8Cz)MnIV(O2•−) species exhibited more electrophilic character toward H-atom transfer than the cumylperoxyl radical. Our mechanistic findings suggested that catalytic oxidations should be possible with the appropriate substrate, and indeed, it was shown that carrying out the reaction with a stronger hydrogen donor such as AcrH2 leads to the photocatalytic oxidation of this substrate by O2 and (TBP8Cz)MnIII as catalyst. We have thus revealed a new method for the selective oxidation of benzylic C-H bonds involving only O2, light and a discrete MnIII complex. The mechanistic findings and accompanying model (Scheme 2) provide valuable insights into the generation of high-valent metal-oxo intermediates via O2 activation in the presence of a hydrogen-atom (electron and proton) source.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid (No. 20108010 to S.F. and 23750014 to K.O.), the NSF (CHE0909587 and CHE121386 to D.P.G.), the NIH (GM101153 to D.P.G) by a Grant-in-Aid (20108010) and a Global COE Program (“The Global Education and Research Center for Bio-Environmental Chemistry”) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, and by KOSEF/MEST through the WCU Project (R31-2008-000-10010-0). K.A.P. is grateful for a Harry and Cleio Greer Fellowship.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

UV-vis spectra (Figure S1, S2, S3 and S13), GC charts (Figure S4), calibration plots for GC measurements (Figure S5), kinetic plots (Figures S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11 and S12), phosphorescence spectra (Figures S14), and yields of the products (Table S1). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

REFERENCES

  • 1.(a) Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism and Biochemistry. 3rd Kluwer; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]; (b) Rittle J, Green MT. Science. 2010;330:933–937. doi: 10.1126/science.1193478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Meunier B, editor. Metal-Oxo and Metal-Peroxo Species in Catalytic Oxidations. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 2000. [Google Scholar]; (d) Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 3rd Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Sono M, Roach MP, Coulter ED, Dawson JH. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2841–2888. doi: 10.1021/cr9500500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Groves JT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:3569–3574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0830019100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Denisov IG, Makris TM, Sligar SG, Schlichting I. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:2253–2277. doi: 10.1021/cr0307143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Makris TM, von Koenig K, Schlichting I, Sligar SGJ. Inorg. Biochem. 2006;100:507–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2006.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Meunier B, de Visser SP, Shaik S. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:3947–3980. doi: 10.1021/cr020443g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Betley TA, Wu Q, Voorhis TV, Nocera DG. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:1849–1861. doi: 10.1021/ic701972n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mullins C, Pecoraro VL. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008;252:416–443. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cady CW, Crabtree RH, Brudvig GW. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008;252:444–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wydrzynski T, Satoh K, editors. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration. Vol. 22. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2005. Photosystem II: The Light-Driven Water: Plastoquinone Oxidoreductase. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) McEvoy JP, Brudvig GW. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:4455–4483. doi: 10.1021/cr0204294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Betley TA, Wu Q, Van Voorhis T, Nocera DG. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:1849–1861. doi: 10.1021/ic701972n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Umena Y, Kawakami K, Shen JR, Kamiya N. Nature. 2011;473:55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature09913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Barber J. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:1700–1710. doi: 10.1021/ic701835r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Meunier B. Chem. Rev. 1992;92:1411–1456. [Google Scholar]; (b) D. Mansuy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1993;125:129–142. [Google Scholar]; (c) Groves JT. In: Cytochrome P450: Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry. 3rd Ortiz de Montellano PR, editor. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York: 2005. pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar]; (d) Groves JT, Lee J, Marla SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:6269–6273. [Google Scholar]; (e) Jin N, Groves JT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:2923–2924. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Nam W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40:465–465. doi: 10.1021/ar700027f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nam W. In: Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II: From Biology to Nanotechnology. Que L Jr., Tolman WT, editors. Vol. 8. Elsevier Ltd.; Oxoford: 2004. pp. 281–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Martinho M, Blain G, Banse F. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:1630–1634. doi: 10.1039/b918061c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hong S, Lee Y-M, Shin W, Fukuzumi S, Nam W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13910–13911. doi: 10.1021/ja905691f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Thibon A, England J, Martinho M, Young VG, Jr., Frisch JR, Guillot R, Girerd J-J, Munck E, Que L, Jr., Banse F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:7064–7067. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Fujii H. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002;226:51–60. [Google Scholar]; (b) McLain JL, Lee J, Groves JT. In: Biomimetic Oxidations Catalyzed by Transition Metal Complexes. Meunier B, editor. Imperial College Press; London: 2000. pp. 91–169. [Google Scholar]; (c) Watanabe Y. In: The Porphyrin Handbook. Kadish KM, Smith KM, Guilard R, editors. Vol. 4. Vol. 30. Academic; New York: 2000. pp. 97–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Sawada Y, Matsumoto K, Katsuki T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:4559–4561. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fujita M, Costas M, Que L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:9912–9913. doi: 10.1021/ja029863d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Battioni P, Renaud JP, Bartoli JF, Reinaartiles M, Fort M, Mansuy D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:8462–8470. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bernadou J, Fabiano A-S, Robert A, Meunier B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:9375–9376. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Jin N, Bourassa JL, Tizio SC, Groves JT. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:3849–3851. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001103)39:21<3849::AID-ANIE3849>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nam W, Kim I, Lim MH, Choi HJ, Lee JS, Jang HG. Chem.–Eur. J. 2002;8:2067–2071. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020503)8:9<2067::AID-CHEM2067>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang R, Newcomb M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:12418–12419. doi: 10.1021/ja0377448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhang R, Horner JH, Newcomb M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:6573–6582. doi: 10.1021/ja045042s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Shimazaki Y, Nagano T, Takesue H, Ye B-H, Tani F, Naruta Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004;43:98–100. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McLain JL, Lee J, Groves JT. In: Biomimetic Oxidations Catalyzed by Transition Metal Complexes. Meunier B, editor. Imperial College Press; London: 2000. pp. 91–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gross Z, Golubkov G, Simkhovich L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000;39:4045–4047. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001117)39:22<4045::aid-anie4045>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Nam W, Jin SW, Lim MH, Ryu JY, Kim C. Inorg. Chem. 2002;41:3647–3652. doi: 10.1021/ic011145p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nam W, Kim I, Lim MH, Choi HJ, Lee JS, Jang HG. Chem.–Eur. J. 2002;8:2067–2071. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020503)8:9<2067::AID-CHEM2067>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fukuzumi S, Kishi T, Kotani H, Lee Y-M, Nam W. Nat. Chem. 2011;3:38–41. doi: 10.1038/nchem.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Reginato G, Di Bari L, Salvadori P, Guilard R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000:1165–1171. [Google Scholar]; (b) Battioni P, Cardin E, Louloudi M, Schollhorn B, Spyroulias GA, Mansuy D, Traylor TG. Chem. Commun. 1996:2037–2038. [Google Scholar]; (c) Nishiyama H, Shimada T, Itoh H, Sugiyama H, Motoyama Y. Chem. Commun. 1997:1863–1864. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu HY, Lai TS, Yeung LL, Chang CK. Org. Lett. 2003;5:617–620. doi: 10.1021/ol027111i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Low DW, Winkler JR, Gray HB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:117–120. [Google Scholar]; (b) Berglund J, Pascher T, Winkler JR, Gray HB. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:2464–2469. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Hirai Y, Kojima T, Mizutani Y, Shiota Y, Yoshizawa K, Fukuzumi S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:5772–5776. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kojima T, Hirai Y, Ikemura K, Ogura T, Shiota Y, Yoshizawa K, Fukuzumi S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:8449–8453. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sawant SC, Wu X, Cho J, Cho K-B, Kim SH, Seo MS, Lee Y-M, Kubo M, Ogura T, Shaik S, Nam W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:8190–8194. doi: 10.1002/anie.201000819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kojima T, Nakayama K, Ikemura K, Ogura T, Fukuzumi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:11692–11700. doi: 10.1021/ja2037645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.(a) Bozoglian F, Romain S, Erten MZ, Todorova TK, Sens C, Mola J, Rodoríguez M, Romero I, Benet-Buchholz J, Fontrodona X, Cramer CJ, Gagliardi L, Llobet A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:15176–15187. doi: 10.1021/ja9036127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sartorel A, Miró P, Salvadori E, Romain S, Carrano M, Scorrano G, Valentin MD, Llobet A, Bonchio M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:16051–16053. doi: 10.1021/ja905067u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) Kotani H, Suenobu T, Lee Y-M, Nam W, Fukuzumi S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:3249–3251. doi: 10.1021/ja109794p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kalita D, Radaram B, Brooks B, Kannam PP, Zhao X. ChemCatChem. 2011;3:571–573. [Google Scholar]; (c) Li F, Yu M, Jiang Y, Huang F, Li Y, Zhang B, Sun L. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:8949–8951. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12558c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sartorel A, Carraro M, Scorrano G, Zorzi RD, Geremia S, McDaniel ND, Bernhard S, Bonchio M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:5006–5007. doi: 10.1021/ja077837f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.(a) Geletii YV, Huang Z, Hou Y, Musaev DG, Lian T, Hill CL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:7522–7523. doi: 10.1021/ja901373m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Besson C, Huang Z, Geletii YV, Lense S, Hardcastle KI, Musaev DG, Lian T, Proust A, Hill CL. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:2784–2786. doi: 10.1039/b926064a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.(a) Moyer BA, Thompson MS, Meyer TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980;102:2310–2312. [Google Scholar]; (b) Moyer BA, Meyer TJ. Inorg. Chem. 1981;20:436–444. [Google Scholar]; (c) Che C-M, Yam VW-W, Mak TCW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:2284–2291. [Google Scholar]; (d) Szczepura LF, Maricich SM, See RF, Churchill MR, Takeuchi KJ. Inorg. Chem. 1995;34:4198–4205. [Google Scholar]; (e) Che C-M, Cheng K-W, Chan MCW, Lau T-C, Mak C-K. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:7996–8000. doi: 10.1021/jo0010126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Meyer TJ, Huynh MHV. Inorg. Chem. 2003;42:8140–8160. doi: 10.1021/ic020731v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Dhuri SN, Seo MS, Lee Y-M, Hirao H, Wang Y, Nam W, Shaik S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008;47:3356–3359. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.(a) Tabushi I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988;86:1–42. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fukuzumi S, Mochizuki S, Tanaka T. Isr. J. Chem. 1988;28:29–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.(a) Hong S, Lee Y-M, Shin W, Fukuzumi S, Nam W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:13910–13911. doi: 10.1021/ja905691f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lee Y-M, Hong S, Morimoto Y, Shin W, Fukuzumi S, Nam W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:10668–10670. doi: 10.1021/ja103903c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.(a) O’Reilly ME, Del Castillo TJ, Falkowski JM, Ramachandran V, Pati M, Correia MC, Abboud KA, Dalal NS, Richardson DE, Veige AS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:13661–13673. doi: 10.1021/ja2050474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Egorova OA, Tsay OG, Khatua S, Huh JO, Churchill DG. Inorg. Chem. 2009;48:4634–4636. doi: 10.1021/ic900393v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.(a) Meier-Callahan AE, Gray HB, Gross Z. Inorg. Chem. 2000;39:3605–3607. doi: 10.1021/ic000180d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Meier-Callahan AE, Di Bilio AJ, Simkhovich L, Mahammed A, Goldberg I, Gray HB, Gross Z. Inorg. Chem. 2001;40:6788–6793. doi: 10.1021/ic010723z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mahammed A, Gray HB, Meier-Callahan AE, Gross Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:1162–1163. doi: 10.1021/ja028216j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Egorova OA, Tsay OG, Khatua S, Meka B, Maiti N, Kim MK, Kwon SJ, Huh JO, Bucella D, Kang SO, Kwak J, Churchill DG. Inorg. Chem. 2010;49:502–512. doi: 10.1021/ic9021432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prokop KA, Goldberg DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:8014–8017. doi: 10.1021/ja300888t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.(a) Rosenthal J, Luckett TD, Hodgkiss JM, Nocera DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:6546–6547. doi: 10.1021/ja058731s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pistorio BJ, Chang CJ, Nocera DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:7884–7885. doi: 10.1021/ja026017u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Harischandra DN, Lowery G, Zhang R, Newcomb M. Org. Lett. 2009;11:2089–2092. doi: 10.1021/ol900480p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Vanover E, Huang Y, Xu LB, Newcomb M, Zhang R. Org. Lett. 2010;12:2246–2249. doi: 10.1021/ol1005938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Peterson MW, Rivers DS, Richman RM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985;107:2907–2915. [Google Scholar]; (f) Ghosh A, de Oliveira FT, Yano T, Nishioka T, Beach ES, Kinoshita I, Münck E, Ryabov AD, Horwitz CP, Collins TJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:2505–2513. doi: 10.1021/ja0460458. For a closely related nonporphyrin Fe–O–Fe complex. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.(a) Suslick KS, Watson RA. New J. Chem. 1992;16:633–642. [Google Scholar]; (b) Maldotti A, Amadelli R, Bartocci C, Carassiti V, Polo E, Varani G. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1993;125:143–154. [Google Scholar]; (c) Maldotti A, Bartocci C, Varani G, Molinari A, Battioni P, Mansuy D. Inorg. Chem. 1996;35:1126–1131. doi: 10.1021/ic950386s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Maldotti A, Andreotti L, Molinari A, Carassiti V. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1999;4:154–161. doi: 10.1007/s007750050298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.(a) Lansky DE, Mandimutsira B, Ramdhanie B, Clausen M, Penner-Hahn J, Zvyagin SA, Telser J, Krzystek J, Zhan R, Ou Z, Kadish KM, Zakharov L, Rheingold AL, Goldberg DP. Inorg. Chem. 2005;44:4485–4498. doi: 10.1021/ic0503636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ramdhanie B, Stern CL, Goldberg DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:9447–9448. doi: 10.1021/ja011229x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mandimutsira BS, Ramdhanie B, Todd RC, Wang HL, Zareba AA, Czernuszewicz RS, Goldberg DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:15170–15171. doi: 10.1021/ja028651d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Armarego WLF, Perrin DD, editors. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fukuzumi S, Ohkubo K, Tokuda Y, Suenobu T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:4286–4294. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hatchard CG, Parker CA. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A. 1956;235:518–536. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.(a) Fukuzumi S, Shimoosako K, Suenobu T, Watanabe Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:9074–9082. doi: 10.1021/ja035156o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Matsumoto T, Ohkubo K, Honda K, Yazawa A, Furutachi H, Fujinami S, Fukuzumi S, Suzuki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:9258–9267. doi: 10.1021/ja809822c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Osako T, Ohkubo K, Taki M, Tachi Y, Fukuzumi S, Itoh S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:11027–11033. doi: 10.1021/ja029380+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Ohkubo K, Moro-oka Y, Fukuzumi S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:999–1001. doi: 10.1039/b600111d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Nakanishi I, Miyazaki K, Shimada T, Ohkubo K, Urano S, Ikota N, Ozawa T, Fukuzumi S, Fukuhara K. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:11123–11126. [Google Scholar]; (f) Nakanishi I, Uto Y, Ohkubo K, Ozawa T, Fukuhara K, Fukuzumi S, Nagasawa H, Hori H, Ikota N. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003;1:1452–1454. doi: 10.1039/b302098c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.(a) Lansky DE, Goldberg DP. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:5119–5125. doi: 10.1021/ic060491+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Prokop KA, Visser SP. Goldberg, D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49:5091–5095. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fukuzumi S, Ohkubo K, Chen Y, Pandey RK, Zhan R, Shao J, Kadish KM. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:5105–5113. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Berkowitz J, Ellison CB, Gutman D. J. Phys. Chem. 1994;98:2744–2765. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.(a) Rodriguez J, Holten D. J. Chem. Phys. 1989;91:3525–3531. [Google Scholar]; (b) Humphrey JL, Kuciauskas D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:3902–3903. doi: 10.1021/ja0588353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.(a) Yan X, Kirmaier C, Holten D. Inorg. Chem. 1986;25:4774–4777. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gonçalves P,J, De Boni L.; Borissevitch IE, Zílio SC. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2008;112:6522–6526. doi: 10.1021/jp800589j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Krokos E, Spänig F, Ruppert M, Hirsch A, Guldi DM. Chem.–Eur. J. 2012;18:1328–1341. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.(a) Fukuzumi S, Suenobu T, Patz M, Hirasaka T, Itoh S, Fujitsuka M, Ito O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:8060–8068. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kawashima Y, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2013;117:6737–6743. doi: 10.1021/jp4047165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.The one-electron oxidation potential of [(TBP8Cz)MnIII]* (7T1) is estimated by subtracting the 7T1 excited state energy (1.59 eV)44 from the one-electron oxidation potential of the ground state.45.
  • 44.Brookfieldh RL, Llula E, Harriman The 7T1 excited state energy was taken from the value of MnIIITPP. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2. 1985;81:1837–1848. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fukuzumi S, Kotani H, Prokop KA, Goldberg DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:1859–1869. doi: 10.1021/ja108395g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.(a) Sawyer DT, Chiericato G, Jr., Angelis CT, Nanni EJ, Jr., Tsuchiya T. Anal. Chem. 1982;54:1720–1724. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kawashima T, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011;13:3344–3352. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00916d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fukuzumi S, Fujita S, Suenobu T, Yamada H, Imahori H, Araki Y, Ito O. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:1241–1247. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.The binding of O2•− to [(TBP8Cz)MnIV]+ may facilitate the electron-transfer reaction, because the electron-transfer product is more stabilized thermodynamically.
  • 48.(a) Fukuzumi S, Ohkubo K, Zheng X, Chen Y, Pandey RK, Zhan R, Kadish KM. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:2738–2746. doi: 10.1021/jp0766757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tanaka M, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2006;110:11214–11218. doi: 10.1021/jp064130r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.(a) Araki Y, Dobrowolski DC, Goyne TE, Hanson DC, Jiang ZQ, Lee KJ, Foote CS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984;106:4570–4575. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fukuzumi S, Fujita S, Suenobu T, Yamada H, Imahori H, Araki Y, Ito O. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2002;106:1241–1247. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.The maximum quantum yield for the formation of (TBP8Cz)MnV(O) was determined to be 0.028% for hexamethylbenzene (0.10 M).
  • 51.Kim SO, Sastri CV, Seo MS, Kim J, Nam W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:4178–4179. doi: 10.1021/ja043083i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tokumura K, Ozaki T, Nosaka H, Saigusa Y, Itoh M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:4974–4980. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.A radical clock substrate (trans-1-methyl-2-phenylcyclopropane) with fast rearrangement (4 × 1011 s−1)54 may be useful to confirm the oxygen rebound mechanism in Scheme 2. Appropriate radical clocks which have enough reactivity with (TBP8Cz)MnIV (O2•−) should be chosen to gain more insights into the lifetimes of substrate radicals in the rebound pathway for the future study.
  • 54.Atkinson JK, Hollenberg PF, Ingold KU, Johnson CC, Le Tadic M-H, Newcomb M, Putt DA. Biochemistry. 1994;33:10630–10637. doi: 10.1021/bi00201a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.(a) Parshall GW, Ittel SD. Homogeneous Catalysis. 2nd. Wiley; New York: 1992. Chap. 10. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sheldon RA, Kochi JK. Adv. Catal. 1976;25:272–413. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.(a) Kochi JK, Krusic PJ, Eaton DR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969;91:1877–1879. [Google Scholar]; (b) Krusic PJ, Kochi JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968;90:7155–7157. [Google Scholar]; (c) Krusic PJ, Kochi JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969;91:3938–3940. [Google Scholar]; (d) Krusic PJ, Kochi JK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969;91:3942–3944. [Google Scholar]; (e) Kochi JK, Krusic PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969;91:3944–3946. [Google Scholar]; (f) Howard JA, Furimsky E. Can. J. Chem. 1974;52:555–556. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.(a) Fukuzumi S, Ono Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1977:622–625. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fukuzumi S, Ono Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1977:625–630. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hendry DG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967;89:5433–5438. [Google Scholar]; (d) Zwolenik JJ. J. Phys. Chem. 1967;71:2464–2469. [Google Scholar]; (e) Bennett JE, Brown DM, Mile B. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1970;68:397–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.The concentration of cumylperoxyl radical generated in an EPR tube under photoirradiation is ~10−6 M calculated by the integration of EPR spectrum.
  • 59.(a) Fukuzumi S, Ohkubo K, Suenobu T, Kato K, Fujitsuka M, Ito OJ. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:8459–8467. doi: 10.1021/ja004311l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Murakami M, Ohkubo K, Fukuzumi S. Chem.–Eur. J. 2010;16:7820–7832. doi: 10.1002/chem.200903236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mayer JM. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998;31:441–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wu Y-D, Wong C-L, Chan KWK. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:746–750. doi: 10.1021/jo951212v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.(a) Wagner PJ, Lam HMH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980;102:4167–4172. [Google Scholar]; (b) Matsushita Y, Yamaguchi Y, Hikida T. Chem. Phys. 1996;213:413–419. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fukuzumi S, Ohkubo K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10270–10271. doi: 10.1021/ja026613o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.(a) Fukuzumi S, Tokuda Y, Kitano T, Okamoto T, Otera J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:8960–8968. The KIE value is somewhat larger than those observed for proton-transfer reactions of ArcH2.+ (KIE = 9-10) probably due to a larger contribution of the tunneling effect. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ishikawa M, Fukuzumi S. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1. 1990;86:3531–3536. [Google Scholar]; (c) Fukuzumi S, Koumitsu S, Hironaka K, Tanaka T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:305–316. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES