Skip to main content
Eukaryotic Cell logoLink to Eukaryotic Cell
. 2004 Apr;3(2):564–566. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.2.564-566.2004

Identification of Genes Dependent on the MADS Box Transcription Factor SrfA in Dictyostelium discoideum Development

Ricardo Escalante 1, Negin Iranfar 2, Leandro Sastre 1,*, William F Loomis 2
PMCID: PMC387645  PMID: 15075287

Abstract

Analysis of microarrays containing 6,345 Dictyostelium discoideum genes has identified 21 whose expression is dependent on the MADS box transcription factor SrfA. In wild-type cells, all of these genes are induced late in development. At least four of them are necessary for proper spore differentiation, stability, and/or germination.


Dictyostelium discoideum strains carrying null mutations in the srfA gene form abnormal spores that do not resist adverse conditions (4). srfA codes for a protein homologue to serum response factor transcription factors that bind to the minor grove of DNA through a conserved domain, the MADS box (13, 17). Ultrastructural analyses of srfA spores have shown that actin rods are initiated but do not elongate as in wild-type spores and subsequently disaggregate. The spore coats of srfA spores are initially indistinguishable from those of wild-type spores but become shredded with time (7). These structural changes are accompanied by reduced expression of spore-specific genes, such as spiA (3, 4). Altogether, these data suggest that srfA is necessary for the late steps of spore differentiation.

Microarrays containing 6,345 D. discoideum cDNA clones (9), including 690 previously characterized developmental genes and 5,655 cDNA clones from the Japanese EST Project (12), were used to identify genes dependent on SrfA for their expression. With Trizol reagent (Gibco BRL), RNAs were isolated from wild-type (AX4) and srfA (IIB100, derived from AX4) strains at 2-h intervals throughout development on filters (16) and compared to time-averaged RNA from wild-type cells, as previously described (9). Temporal changes for each gene were analyzed in an Axon Genepix 4000B scanner with GeneSpring software from Silicon Genetics. The total Cy3 signal was normalized to the total Cy5 signal after background subtraction to allow independent slides to be compared. The Cy3/Cy5 ratios of individual genes were then calculated. Each sample was hybridized to two or more microarrays, and each developmental time course was repeated at least twice. A list of the genes and mean values used for subsequent analyses are available at http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/paper2.html (see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material).

Genes that were expressed at lower levels in the mutant cells than in wild-type cells were all induced after 20 h of development. Therefore, RNAs from the two last developmental stages of each strain (22 and 24 h for wild-type cells and 26 and 28 h for srfA cells, due to a slight delay in culmination observed in the mutant strain [6]) were directly compared to each other. Microarrays were simultaneously hybridized with Cy3 and Cy5 probes generated from wild-type and srfA strains, respectively. Thirty genes showed a more-than-threefold higher signal level with wild-type samples than with mutant samples and were considered candidates for SrfA-dependent genes. Microarray data are publically available at http://www.biology.ucsd.edu/loomis-cgi/microarray/srfA_paper.html (see Table S3 in the supplemental material).

The pattern of expression of the potential SrfA-dependent genes was further analyzed by Northern blot hybridization as previously described (5). Twenty-two genes were confirmed to be SrfA dependent (Fig. 1 and 2). The cDNA clones have been grouped according to their temporal pattern of expression. The expression of the first group of 11 genes, shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1, is detected exclusively during culmination in wild-type cells. The expression of the second group of 11 genes, shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1, is detected at low levels at earlier stages and induced at high levels during culmination. This late induction was not observed in srfA strains. As a control, we analyzed several genes that are expressed late in development but did not give higher signals for wild-type samples than for srfA samples on the microarrays, including the well-characterized prespore-specific gene pspA (1, 2). Northern blot analyses confirmed these results (data not shown). We also determined the cell type specificity of these genes by interrogating the published microarray data for separated prestalk and prespore cells (10, 11). Ten of the SrfA-dependent genes are preferentially enriched in prespore cells and spores, while three are preferentially expressed in prestalk and stalk cells (Table 1).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Developmental expression of SrfA-dependent genes expressed only late in development. Total RNA was isolated from wild-type (AX4) or srfA-null cells at the indicated times of development (hours). After electrophoretic separation and transfer to nylon membranes, each blot was hybridized to a PCR probe corresponding to the cDNA indicated on the left. The right column indicates the ratio of the signal on microarrays from AX4 cells at 22 and 24 h of development to that from srfA cells at 26 and 28 h of development.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Developmental expression of SrfA-dependent genes that are expressed early in development and up-regulated late in development. Total RNA was isolated from wild-type (AX4) or srfA-null cells at the indicated times of development (hours). Northern blots were hybridized to the cDNA probe indicated on the left. The right column indicates the ratio of the signal on microarrays from AX4 cells at 22 and 24 h of development to that from srfA cells at 26 and 28 h of development for each gene.

TABLE 1.

Possible functions of the proteins encoded by SrfA-dependent genesa

cDNA (gene) GenBank accession no. Product Closest homologa Gene expression patternb
Stress response
    SLK452 AY386221 Catalase B 1, spores
    SSF584 AY392429 Peroxinectin 1
    SLA632 AY392430 Heat shock protein 88 2
    SSB695 AU037272 Unknown Low-temperature or -salt response (46) 1
    SSG693 AY392431 Unknown DNA ligase (29) 1
    SSE445 AY392432 Unknown DNA helicase (39) 1
    SLF664 AY392438 Unknown DNA repair protein RAD50 (19) 1, spores
Cell signaling
    SSK576 AY392433 Phospholipase C 2, spores
    SSE393 AY392434 Unknown 5′ AMP-activated gamma subunit (27) 2
Cytoskeleton and spore coat
    SSF455 D37981 Cofilin B 2, spores
    SLB616 X54452 SpiAc 1, spores
    SSK268/SLJ453 AY392441 Unknown Blackjack protein, microtubule associated (19) 2, spores
    sigD AY387647 Unknownc Spore coat proteins (28) 1, spores
Vesicle trafficking
    SSM796 AY392436 Unknown Synaptobrevin (40) 2
    SSB611 AY392437 Unknown Mitochondrial carrier protein RIM (31) 1
Cell adhesion
    SSJ826 AY392438 Unknown Tenascin X (31) 1, stalks
    SSG726 AY392439 Unknown P-selectin (24) 1, stalks
Metabolism
    SLE765 AY387644 SigA malic enzymec 2, spores
    SSA535 AY392440 3-Oxoacyl-acyl carrier 2, stalks
    SSJ666 AY392442 Unknown Alkaline dihydroceramidase (22) 2
Other proteins
    SLA429 AY392443 Unknown endotoxin (23) 2
    SSB379 AY392444 Unknownc RNA-binding proteins (33) 1, spores
    sigB AY387645 Unknownc GP63 metalloproteinase (27) 1, spores
    sigC AY387646 Phg1bc 2
a

The percentage of amino acid identity is given in parentheses.

b

Expression pattern 1 indicates genes that are detected exclusively at late developmental stages while expression pattern 2 indicates genes also detected at earlier stages.

c

Genes previously identified as SrfA dependent (3). The genes coding for SigD, SigC (phg1b), and SigB were not present on the microarrays.

Nine of the SrfA-dependent genes encode known Dictyostelium proteins (present in the Preliminary Directory of Dictyostelium Genes [http://dicty.sdsc.edu/annot-020303.html]), and the others show significant similarity to known proteins in other organisms (Table 1). Two of the cDNA clones, SSK268 and SLJ453, coded for nonoverlapping regions of the same gene. Three other genes (sigB, sigC, and sigD), previously recognized from a subtractive library to be SrfA dependent (3) but not represented on the microarrays, were included in Table 1 for completeness. Mutational analyses have shown that catB, plcD, cofB, and spiA are each necessary for normal spore maturation or germination. catB codes for catalase B and mutant spores have been shown to be abnormally sensitive to H2O2 (8). plcD codes for phospholipase Cδ, which is required for regulation of spore germination (18). cofB codes for cofilin B, which associates with the actin rods in mature spores (15). Absence of actin rods results in round spores with very low viability. Spores deficient in SpiA show decreased viability under submerged conditions (14). Null mutations in malA, sigB, sigC, or sigD cause no apparent defects in spores (3). The other SrfA-dependent genes can be clustered on the basis of putative function of their closest homologs (Table 1). Possible functions include stress responses, actin cytoskeleton organization, metabolic regulation, prespore vesicle fusion, and spore coat stability.

In summary, a total of 24 SrfA-dependent genes have been identified, all of which are expressed late in development. No genes differentially expressed in slug or mid-culmination structures were found, even if srfA is expressed at these developmental stages (6). In addition, these studies have uncovered a novel program of gene expression that is activated late in Dictyostelium development. Thirty-nine genes were found that increased their expression at least threefold between 22 and 24 h of development. A significant proportion of these genes are dependent on SrfA for their expression and might be involved in many of the processes required for terminal spore differentiation.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the Japanese EST Project for supplying inserts of cDNA clones and the BioGEM facility of the University of California at San Diego for arraying them. Annotation of the microarrayed cDNAs benefited from the whole genome sequences generated by the Dictyostelium Sequencing Consortium at the Baylor Sequencing Center, Houston, Tex.; the Institute of Biochemistry, Cologne, Germany; the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Jena, Germany; and the Welcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, England.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM62350) and the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BMC2002-01501).

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://ec.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Barklis, E., and H. F. Lodish. 1983. Regulation of Dictyostelium discoideum mRNAs specific for prespore or prestalk cells. Cell 32:1139-1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Early, A. E., J. G. Williams, H. E. Meyer, S. B. Por, E. Smith, K. L. Williams, and A. A. Gooley. 1988. Structural characterization of Dictyostelium discoideum prespore-specific gene D19 and of its product, cell surface glycoprotein PsA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:3458-3466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Escalante, R., N. Moreno, and L. Sastre. 2003. Identification of Dictyostelium discoideum developmentally regulated genes whose expression is dependent on the MADS box transcription factor SrfA. Eukaryot. Cell 2:1327-1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Escalante, R., and L. Sastre. 1998. A serum response factor homolog is required for spore differentiation in Dictyostelium. Development 125:3801-3808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Escalante, R., and L. Sastre. 1993. Similar alternative splicing events generate two sarcoplasmic or endoplasmic reticulum Ca-ATPase isoforms in the crustacean Artemia franciscana and in vertebrates. J. Biol. Chem. 268:14090-14095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Escalante, R., J. J. Vicente, N. Moreno, and L. Sastre. 2001. The MADS-box gene srfA is expressed in a complex pattern under the control of alternative promoters and is essential for different aspects of Dictyostelium development. Dev. Biol. 235:314-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Escalante, R., Y. Yamada, D. Cotter, L. Sastre, and M. Sameshima. 2004. The MADS-box transcription factor SrfA is required for actin cytoskeleton organization and spore coat stability during Dictyostelium sporulation. Mech. Dev. 121:51-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garcia, M. X., H. Alexander, D. Mahadeo, D. A. Cotter, and S. Alexander. 2003. The Dictyostelium discoideum prespore-specific catalase B functions to control late development and to protect spore viability. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1641:55-64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Iranfar, N., D. Fuller, and W. F. Loomis. 2003. Genome-wide expression analyses of gene regulation during early development of Dictyostelium discoideum. Eukaryot. Cell 2:664-670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iranfar, N., D. Fuller, R. Sasik, T. Hwa, M. Laub, and W. F. Loomis. 2001. Expression patterns of cell-type-specific genes in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2590-2600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maeda, M., H. Sakamoto, N. Iranfar, D. Fuller, T. Maruo, S. Ogihara, T. Morio, H. Urushihara, Y. Tanaka, and W. F. Loomis. 2003. Changing patterns of gene expression in prestalk cell subtypes of Dictyostelium recognized by in situ hybridization with genes from microarray analyses. Eukaryot. Cell 2:627-637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morio, T., H. Urushihara, T. Saito, Y. Ugawa, H. Mizuno, M. Yoshida, R. Yoshino, B. N. Mitra, M. Pi, T. Sato, K. Takemoto, H. Yasukawa, J. Williams, M. Maeda, I. Takeuchi, H. Ochiai, and Y. Tanaka. 1998. The Dictyostelium developmental cDNA project: generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the first-finger stage of development. DNA Res. 5:335-340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pellegrini, L., S. Tan, and T. J. Richmond. 1995. Structure of serum response factor core bound to DNA. Nature 376:490-498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richardson, D. L., and W. F. Loomis. 1992. Disruption of the sporulation-specific gene spiA in Dictyostelium discoideum leads to spore instability. Genes Dev. 6:1058-1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sameshima, M., Y. Kishi, M. Osumi, D. Mahadeo, and D. A. Cotter. 2000. Novel actin cytoskeleton: actin tubules. Cell Struct. Funct. 25:291-295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaulsky, G., and W. F. Loomis. 1993. Cell type regulation in response to expression of ricin-A in Dictyostelium. Dev. Biol. 160:85-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Treisman, R. 1995. DNA-binding proteins. Inside the MADS box. Nature 376:468-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van Dijken, P., and P. J. M. van Haastert. 2001. Phospholipase Cδ regulates germination of Dictyostelium spores. BMC Cell Biol. 2:25-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Eukaryotic Cell are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES