Abstract
Both the spindle pole body (SPB) and the nuclear pore complex (NPC) are essential organelles embedded in the nuclear envelope throughout the life cycle of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, the mechanism by which these two multisubunit structures are inserted into the nuclear envelope during their biogenesis is not well understood. We have previously shown that Ndc1p is the only known integral membrane protein that localizes to both the SPBs and the NPCs and is required for SPB duplication. For this study, we generated a novel temperature-sensitive (ts) allele of NDC1 to investigate the role of Ndc1p at the NPCs. Yeast cells carrying this allele (ndc1-39) failed to insert the SPB into the nuclear envelope at the restrictive temperature. Importantly, the double mutation of ndc1-39 and NPC assembly mutant nic96-1 resulted in cells with enhanced growth defects. While nuclear protein import and NPC distribution in the nuclear envelope were unaffected, ndc1-39 mutants failed to properly incorporate the nucleoporin Nup49p into NPCs. These results provide evidence that Ndc1p is required for NPC assembly in addition to its role in SPB duplication. We postulate that Ndc1p is crucial for the biogenesis of both the SPBs and the NPCs at the step of insertion into the nuclear envelope.
The spindle pole body (SPB) in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the sole microtubule organizing center of the cell. This essential multilayered organelle (26) is comprised of at least 18 different proteins (1, 9, 18, 19) and is embedded in the nuclear envelope throughout the cell cycle. The single SPB duplicates during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, and the two resulting SPBs serve as the poles of the spindle that properly aligns and segregates the chromosomes during mitosis. The fidelity of SPB duplication is crucial to the survival of the cell since perturbations to this process can lead to genetic instability (12).
Ultrastructural studies using electron microscopy have revealed several intermediate steps during SPB duplication (1, 12). The first step is the formation of the satellite, the SPB precursor, on a modified nuclear envelope structure adjacent to the existing SPB called the half-bridge. The satellite enlarges into the duplication plaque, a partial cytoplasmic SPB structure that is then inserted into the nuclear envelope. After insertion, the nuclear SPB components are incorporated into the nascent SPB, after which duplicated side-by-side SPBs separate and migrate to the opposite ends of the nucleus.
Although it is not known how the duplication plaque is inserted into the nuclear envelope, SPB components encoded by NDC1, MPS2, and BBP1 have been implicated at this step (32, 39, 40), and mutations in these genes cause similar SPB duplication defects. For example, cells carrying the cold-sensitive ndc1-1 mutation are unable to insert the duplication plaque into the nuclear envelope at the restrictive temperature of 15°C (40). The cells arrest transiently in mitosis with a monopolar spindle but eventually go through mitosis without proper DNA segregation and produce polyploid, aploid, or aneuploid daughter cells (35, 40).
NDC1 encodes an essential integral membrane protein with 6 or 7 predicted transmembrane domains (11, 40). As previously reported, yeast cells are very sensitive to NDC1 gene dosage (10). For example, overexpression of NDC1 causes cells to exhibit SPB duplication defects similar to that observed for ndc1-1 mutants. In addition, NDC1 is one of the few genes in yeast that is haplo-insufficient, meaning diploid cells are not viable with only one chromosomal copy of NDC1. Ndc1p and its orthologue, Cut11p of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, are unique in that they are the only known integral membrane proteins that localize to both the SPBs and the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) (11, 38). While roles for Ndc1p and Cut11p at SPBs have been established through the use of conditional alleles, no NPC-associated functions such as nuclear protein import, mRNA export, NPC distribution, or NPC assembly have been observed thus far (11).
The NPC controls the trafficking of macromolecules between the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Approximately 30 different proteins make up the NPC, which contains a ring of eight symmetrical spokes surrounding a central transporter (28, 34, 36, 43). In addition, structures such as the cytoplasmic filaments and nuclear filaments, which connect to form a nuclear pore basket, are important for facilitating cargo docking and transport. In yeast, both the NPCs and the SPBs are inserted into the nuclear envelope during their biogenesis, but unlike SPB duplication, NPCs are synthesized continuously throughout the cell cycle (41). Although subcomplexes of nuclear pore proteins, or nucleoporins, have been identified (34), the assembly mechanism of the nucleoporins into NPCs is not well understood. Nonetheless, studies from vertebrate models suggest that integral membrane proteins are crucial during NPC assembly (8, 36). Interestingly, the nic96-1 or nup192-15 mutation or the depletion of NSP1 in yeast causes a decrease in NPC numbers, indicating that NPC assembly is affected in these strains (15, 22, 25, 44). In addition, genetic screens have revealed that several genes involved in the Ran GTPase cycle and in endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi trafficking also affect NPC assembly (7, 29, 30). Despite the localization of Ndc1p to NPCs and the genetic interaction between NDC1 and another pore membrane protein, encoded by POM152, NPC-associated functions appear to be normal in ndc1-1 mutants (11).
For this study, we generated a novel temperature-sensitive (ts) allele of NDC1, ndc1-39, to address whether Ndc1p has a functional role at the NPCs. We demonstrate that ndc1-39 causes both SPB duplication and potential NPC assembly defects and provide evidence that Ndc1p, the only pore membrane protein essential for viability in the budding yeast, may be required for NPC assembly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Yeast strains and media.
The yeast strains used for this study are listed in Table 1. Yeast manipulations were performed by using standard techniques (16). Yeast cells were grown in YPD medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto Peptone, and 2% glucose), raffinose-containing medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto Peptone, and 3% raffinose), or synthetic medium with 3% raffinose or 2% glucose supplemented with appropriate amino acids. For galactose induction experiments, galactose was added to a final concentration of 3%. Plates containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) were made as previously described (4). Yeast cells were arrested in G1 phase by use of synthetic α-factor peptide (Macromolecular Resources, Fort Collins, Colo.) at 11 μg/ml.
TABLE 1.
Strain | Relevant genotype | Reference or source |
---|---|---|
1258 | MATanup133Δ::HIS3 nup49-1::URA3-nup49ΔGLFG::GFP-S65T-TRP1 ade2-1::ADE2-URA3 (SWY828) | 7 |
1264 | MATα NDC1 | 5 |
2252 | MATa nic96::HIS3 + pUN100-LEU2-nic96-1 | 44 |
2568 | MATaNDC1 | This study |
2709 | MATα ndc1Δ::KanMX + pALR10-NDC1 | This study |
2710 | MATandc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 | This study |
2804 | MATaSPC42-GFP-KanMX4 LYS2 | This study |
2925 | MATα prp20-1 leu2 trp 1 ura3 (PSY713) | This study |
3244 | MATa/α ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1/ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3/GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3 + pSW240 (pRS423-NUP49) | 21 |
3245 | MATa/α GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3/GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3 + pSW240 | This study; 6 |
3299 | MATa/α ndc1-1/ndc1-1 GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3/GAL10-GFP-S65T-nup49-URA3 lys2-801/+ trp1-1/+ +pSW240 | This study; 6 |
3345 | MATa/α nup49-1::URA3-nup49ΔGLFG::GFP-S65T-TRP1/nup49-1::URA3-nup49ΔGLFG::GFP-S65T-TRP1 | This study; 6 |
3346 | MATa/α ndcIΔ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1/ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 nup49-1::URA3-nup49ΔGLFG::GFP-S65T-TRP1/nup49-1::URA3-nup49ΔGLFG::GFP-S65T-TRP1 | This study; 6 |
3446 | MATαndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 | This study |
3447 | MATandc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 SPC42-GFP-KanMX4 | This study |
3448 | MATa/andc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1/ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 SPC42-GFP-KanMX4/SPC42-GFP-KanMX4 | This study |
3451 | MATandc1Δ::KanMX SPC42-GFP-KanMX4 +pRS314-NDC1-3xmyc | This study |
3452 | MATandc1Δ::KanMX SPC42-GFP-KanMX4 +pRS314-ndc1-39-3xmyc | This study |
3538 | MATα ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 nic96::HIS3 + pUN100-LEU2-nic96-1 | This study |
3539 | MATα ndc1Δ::KanMX::ndc1-39-TRP1 nic96::HIS3 + pUN100-LEU2-nic96-1 | This study |
All strains generated for this study were derivatives of an S288C-based strain (ade2Δ::hisG his3Δ200 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 met15Δ0 trp1Δ63 ura3Δ0) (5), except strain 3299, which was a derivative of another S288C-based strain (ade2Δ426 ade3Δ his3Δ200 leu2Δ1 lys2-801 ura3-52). Strains 3244, 3245, and 3299 were descendants of SWY865, and strains 3345 and 3346 were descendants of SWY809 (6). Both SWY809 and SWY865 were derived from W303 (ade2-1 can1-100 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1).
Strain 2709 (ndc1Δ::KanMX/pALR10-NDC1) was made by use of a two-step gene replacement technique (27) to replace the NDC1 open reading frame (ORF) of the wild-type strain (strain 1264) with KanMX (37). Strain 2709 also contains the pALR10-NDC1 plasmid (11). Strain 2804 (SPC42 GFP KanMX4) was made by tagging the endogenous SPC42 gene at the carboxyl terminus with green fluorescent protein (GFP) by standard techniques (20).
For the isolation of NDC1 temperature-sensitive (ts) alleles, an NDC1 mutagenized library (see below) was transformed into strain 2709 (ndc1Δ::KanMX/pALR10-NDC1). Of the approximately 5,200 colonies screened, 622 were able to grow on 5-FOA-containing plates, indicating that the mutagenized copy of NDC1 could supply NDC1 function at the permissive temperature of 23°C. These colonies were then tested for temperature sensitivity at the restrictive temperature of 35°C. One of the three temperature-sensitive (ts) alleles of NDC1 obtained (ndc1-39) displayed interesting phenotypes and was further characterized, and the molecular lesions of the ndc1-39 mutant were determined.
The ndc1-39 allele was tagged with three copies of the myc epitope (pRS314-ndc1-39-3xmyc) by replacing the XhoI-MscI NDC1 fragment (contains the entire NDC1 ORF except the last 19 amino acids) of pRS314-NDC1-3xmyc with the XhoI-MscI ndc1-39 fragment from pRS314-ndc1-39 (originated from the mutagenized library). pRS314-ndc1-39-3xmyc was transformed into strain 2709 (ndc1Δ::KanMX/pALR10-NDC1), and then pALR10-NDC1 was removed by counterselection on a 5-FOA plate to create strain 3450.
The ndc1-39 allele was integrated into the chromosome by use of the following method. First, pRS304-KanMX was created by subcloning the BglII-EcoRI fragment containing the KanMX gene from pRS400 (5) into filled NotI sites of pRS304 (33). Second, the XhoI-SpeI ndc1-39 fragment (includes the entire NDC1 ORF) from pRS314-ndc1-39 was cloned into pRS304-KanMX to generate pRS304-KanMX-ndc1-39. Third, pRS304-KanMX-ndc1-39 was then linearized at the EcoNI site and integrated into the KanMX gene of strain 2709 (ndc1Δ::KanMX/pALR10-NDC1). pALR10-NDC1 was then removed by counterselection on a 5-FOA plate to create strain 2710.
Plasmids.
Circular and linearized plasmids were transformed into yeast by use of an EZ transformation kit (Zymo Research, Orange, Calif.).
All of the NDC1 truncation constructs were made as described previously (23) and according to the pGEM Single Strand Systems manual (Promega, Madison, Wis.). First, pBS-NDC1-3xmyc was created by cloning the XhoI-SpeI fragment of NDC1-3xmyc (10) (GenBank number X52328) into pBluescript II SK(+) (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). Next, each of the seven pairs of NDC1 truncation oligonucleotides was used for single-strand mutagenesis to introduce two NcoI sites (underlined) into pBS-NDC1-3xmyc at various NDC1 locations. The sequences of the NDC1 truncation oligonucleotides were as follows: NDC1mut1, CAG GGC AAG CCC ATG GTA CAG ACG CC; NDC1mut85, CAA GAA AAA ATT CCA TGG ATG TAA AG; NDC1mut174, CGA AAA CTT TTC CAT GGC CCC ACA AG; NDC1mut255, CAC ATA TGT CCA TGG GTT GTC TGC AC; NDC1mut368, AAT CTA GAT TCC ATG GAT GAG AAC GG; NDC1mut466, AAA ATT CTA CCA TGG CGT TTA TTT TC; NDC1mut573, GAT CCG GAA TCC ATG GCA TAC ACT GC; and NDC1mut655, CCC TAA TGC TAC CAT GGG AGG TGA AC. The NDC1-3xmyc-containing XhoI-SpeI fragments from various pBS-NDC1-3xmyc plasmids with NcoI sites were cloned into pRS314 (33), followed by NcoI restriction digestion and religation, to generate the following seven NDC1 truncations:pRS314-ndc1Δ1-85-3xmyc, pRS314-ndc1Δ85-174-3xmyc, pRS314-ndc1Δ174-255-3xmyc, pRS314-ndc1Δ255-368-3xmyc, pRS314-ndc1Δ368-466-3xmyc, pRS314-ndc1Δ466-573-3xmyc, and pRS314-ndc1Δ573-655-3xmyc. The junctions of all NDC1 truncations were verified by sequence analysis.
For generation of an NDC1 mutagenized library, the NDC1 ORF was PCR amplified with primers 5′XhoI-NDC1 (CCG ATT CTC GAG TAC CGG TCG CGT AAC CCG [the XhoI site that was created is underlined]) and NDC1-P (CAT TCT TGC CAA TTC GGC TC). The following were added to each of the nine 20-μl independent PCR mixtures: 30 ng of pRS315-NDC1 (10), a 0.5 mM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 3 mM MgCl2, a 1 μM concentration of each primer, 0.5 mM MnCl2, and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). After incubation at 95°C for 5 min, the reactions were subjected to 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 53°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 3 min, followed by incubation at 72°C for an additional 7 min. The PCR products were pooled, gel purified by use of a Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.), digested with XhoI and SpeI, and cloned into pRS314. Approximately 2,300 individual bacterial colonies were pooled, and plasmid DNAs were isolated to generate the NDC1 mutagenized library.
Flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (17), with propidium iodide used to stain DNA. Cells were analyzed in a FACScan flow cytometer, and the Cell Quest software package was used for data analysis (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.).
Cytological techniques.
Immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy was performed as described previously (11). Cells containing Myc-epitope-tagged wild-type Ndc1p, truncated Ndc1p, and Ndc1-39p were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 5 min, followed by rinsing with PBSA (10 mg of NaCl/ml, 0.2 mg of KCl/ml, 1.43 mg of KH2PO4/ml). The cells were then incubated in spheroplasting solution (4.83 μg of Zymolyase 100T/ml, 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol in 1.2 M sorbitol, 100 mM KPO4 [pH 7.5]) for 30 min at 30°C. After being rinsed with PBSA, the spheroplasted cells were spotted onto poly-l-lysine-treated microscope slides. The slides were submerged into 100% methanol on ice for a few seconds before being allowed to equilibrate to room temperature. The slides were then submerged into acetone for 30 s at room temperature and dried. Blocking solution (PBSA with 10 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml and 0.1% Tween 20) was applied to the slides before they were treated with a rabbit anti-Myc primary antibody (1:1,000; a gift from Don Cleveland, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, Calif.) overnight at 4°C. After the slides were rinsed with PBSA, a Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:2,000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, Pa.) was applied for 2 h at room temperature in the dark. DNAs were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.) and the slides were mounted in Citifluor (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, Calif.).
Cells containing Spc42p-GFP were processed as described above, except that they were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 45 min and the microscope slides were not treated with methanol and acetone. Microtubules were labeled with YOL1/34 rat anti-α-tubulin primary antibody (1:150; Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corporation, Westbury, N.Y.), and a Texas red-conjugated donkey anti-rat secondary antibody (1:300; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.). Spc42p-GFP was visualized by GFP autofluorescence, and DNAs were visualized by staining with DAPI. Cells containing GAL-H2B1-GFP or constitutively expressed Nup49p-GFP were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 5 min, followed by 20 min in DAPI, to visualize GFP autofluorescence and DNA. Cells containing GAL-Nup49p-GFP were visualized directly without fixation.
Standard fluorescence microscopy was carried out with a Leica DMRXA/RF4/V automated microscope equipped with a SensiCam CCD digital camera (Cooke, Tonawanda, N.Y.), and digital images were processed with Slidebook software (version 3.0.3.1; Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, Colo.).
Immunoelectron microscopy (IEM) experiments were performed as described previously (14). Samples were frozen under high pressure in a BAL-TEC HPM-010 high-pressure freezer, freeze-substituted in 0.25% glutaraldehyde and 0.05% uranyl acetate in acetone, and embedded in Lowicryl HM20, and 60-nm-thick sections were collected on Formvar-coated nickel slot grids. The grids were then floated on blocking solution (1% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline with Tween 20) and labeled with an affinity-purified rabbit anti-GFP primary antibody (diluted 1:100 in blocking solution) (a gift from Jason Kahana, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, and Pamela Silver, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass.) (45). Next, a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated to 15-nm-diameter colloidal gold beads (diluted 1:20 in blocking solution; Ted Pella Inc.) was applied. The grids were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and were visualized in a Philips CM10 or Philips Technai F20 electron microscope operating at 80 kV.
RESULTS
The majority of the NDC1 gene is required for its function.
Ndc1p was previously shown to localize to both the SPBs and NPCs (11). In order to further elucidate the role of NDC1 in both SPB duplication and NPC-associated functions, we constructed seven serial deletion mutations in NDC1 (Fig. 1; also see Materials and Methods), with each containing three copies of the Myc epitope tag at the carboxy terminus. The seven serial NDC1 truncations were assayed for the ability to complement an ndc1Δ strain (Fig. 1). Only the NDC1 truncation Δ368-466 provided sufficient NDC1 functioning for viability, while NDC1 truncations Δ1-85, Δ85-174, Δ174-255, Δ255-368, Δ466-573, and Δ573-655 did not. All of the NDC1 truncation proteins were expressed at the same level as the wild-type protein, as assessed by Western blot analysis (data not shown), except for the NDC1 truncations Δ1-85 and Δ255-368, whose expression was reduced severalfold and therefore whose contribution to functioning cannot be evaluated unambiguously. Consistent with the assay for functioning, only NDC1 truncation protein Δ368-466 localized correctly to the SPBs and the NPCs (Fig. 1 and data not shown), whereas the other six NDC1 truncation proteins were visible neither at the SPBs nor the NPCs. In summary, most of Ndc1p, except the region between amino acids 368 and 466, appears to be essential for its proper localization and functioning. Furthermore, cells containing the Δ368-466 truncation allele did not exhibit any conditional phenotypes, so they were not analyzed further.
ndc1-39 is a novel ts allele of NDC1.
An NDC1 mutagenized library was generated by error-prone PCR as an alternative approach to create ts alleles of NDC1 (see Materials and Methods) because the truncation alleles did not yield a conditional allele and did not point to a specific region of NDC1 for mutagenesis. We isolated the ndc1-39 ts allele by screening NDC1 mutagenized clones that caused cells to display temperature sensitivity at 35°C. When the ndc1-39 allele was sequenced, six mutations (T14M, F218V, L288M, E293G, M457T, and F643L) were identified within the ORF (Fig. 2A). While triple (F218V, L288M, and E293G) or quadruple (T14M, F218V, L288M, and E293G) mutations were able to produce the ts phenotype, pair-wise mutations (T14M and F218V, L288M and E293G, or M457T and F643L) were not (data not shown). Therefore, F218V, L288M, and E293G together were sufficient to cause the ts phenotype of ndc1-39 cells, whereas the mutations T14M, M457T, and F643L were not necessary to generate the ts phenotype. The ndc1-39 allele was integrated into the chromosome at the NDC1 locus more than once in a tandem array (see Discussion). While the growth of ndc1-39 cells was comparable to that of wild-type NDC1 cells at the permissive temperature of 23°C (Fig. 2B, left panel), unlike wild-type cells, ndc1-39 cells were unable to grow at the restrictive temperature of 35°C (Fig. 2B, right panel).
The subcellular localization and protein level of Ndc1-39p were compared with those of wild-type Ndc1p to ensure that the temperature sensitivity of ndc1-39 cells was not due simply to mislocalization or diminished levels of Ndc1-39p. Log-phase cells containing either Ndc1p or Ndc1-39p tagged with three copies of the Myc epitope and SPB component Spc42p fused with GFP were grown at 35°C for 3 h. The localization of wild-type Ndc1p at both SPBs and NPCs by IF microscopy was previous described (11) and is shown in Fig. 2C, top two rows. The subcellular localization of Ndc1-39p at 35°C (Fig. 2C, bottom two rows) was similar to that of Ndc1p. The expression levels of Ndc1p and Ndc1-39p were also equivalent by Western blot analysis at 35°C (data not shown). Therefore, ndc1-39 is a novel allele of NDC1 that is ts at 35°C, with protein localization and an expression level similar to those of the wild-type protein at the restrictive temperature.
ndc1-39 cells fail in SPB duplication and DNA segregation at the restrictive temperature.
To understand the basis of the temperature sensitivity of ndc1-39 cells, we first examined cell cycle progression in these cells by flow cytometry. Disruption of normal cell cycle progression is often seen for SPB duplication mutants at their restrictive temperatures (12). NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells were synchronized in G1 phase with the mating pheromone alpha factor (α-factor) at 23°C. Samples were then taken every hour for 4 h after release from G1 arrest at 23 or 35°C (Fig. 3A). Log-phase cells had normal 1n and 2n DNA peaks (Fig. 3A, cycling), while α-factor-treated cells were mostly arrested in G1 with a 1n DNA peak (Fig. 3A, α-factor). Upon release from α-factor treatment at 23 or 35°C, NDC1 cells (Fig. 3A, left panel) replicated their DNA, displaying a 2n DNA peak; executed mitosis and cytokinesis, returning to a 1n DNA peak; and eventually became asynchronous, with both 1n and 2n DNA peaks. The flow cytometry profile for ndc1-39 cells at 23°C was similar to the profile for wild-type cells (data not shown). In contrast, ndc1-39 cells (Fig. 3A, right panel) transiently arrested in mitosis at 37°C, with a 2n DNA peak, 2 to 3 h after α-factor release. Then, instead of the reappearance of a 1n DNA peak, a 4n DNA peak was observed 4 h after α-factor release. This increase-in-ploidy, or endoreplication, phenotype has been observed for a number of SPB duplication mutants, including ndc1-1 and mps2-1 (12). It is also seen when NDC1 functioning is compromised by either increasing (10) or decreasing (35) the NDC1 gene dosage.
We determined if the disruption of normal cell cycle progression and the increase-in-ploidy phenotype could be due to a failure in DNA segregation by examining the spindle structure in ndc1-39 cells at 35°C by IF microscopy. In NDC1 cells, both normal short and long mitotic spindles were readily observed 2 h after the release from α-factor treatment at 35°C (Fig. 3B, top row), and DNAs in these cells were segregated into two equal masses. However, no mitotic spindles were observed in ndc1-39 cells at the same time point (Fig. 3B, bottom row), even though the DNA contents of NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells were similar (Fig. 3A). Spc42p fused with GFP was used to identify SPBs (Fig. 3B). In 92% (n = 200) of the large-budded ndc1-39 cells that had two distinct Spc42p-GFP signals, all of the DNA was associated with only the one of the two SPBs that was often located near the bud neck. Astral microtubules were associated with one (along with the DNA mass) or both of the SPBs. This monopolar spindle phenotype is similar to that observed in ndc1-1, mps2-1, and bbp1-1 cells at their restrictive temperatures (32, 39, 40). The original SPB is still able to nucleate nuclear microtubules that associate with chromosomes and acts as a spindle pole, but the newly synthesized SPB is defective in forming nuclear microtubules and does not function as a spindle pole. The monopolar spindle phenotype was occasionally seen (<5%; n = 200) in ndc1-39 cells at 23°C and was not observed in wild-type cells.
We performed IEM with ndc1-39 cells 2 h after α-factor release at 35°C to examine the structure of SPBs more closely (Fig. 3C). To be certain of identifying any incomplete or aberrant SPB structures, we immunolabeled Spc42p-GFP as an SPB marker. Wild-type cells with large buds should have completed SPB duplication and separation (1, 12). However, two abnormal phenotypes were seen for ndc1-39 cells. Of the 15 large-budded cells examined, 7 had two adjacent SPB structures (Fig. 3C, panels a and a′) that appeared to have split from a single SPB, since no half-bridge, which normally connects side-by-side SPBs that have not separated, could be detected. In addition, the nuclear envelope invaginated at these SPBs and nuclear microtubules splayed out (Fig. 3C, panel a, arrows). In the other eight cells examined, two separate SPBs were observed (Fig. 3C, panels b, b′, c, and c′). One of the SPBs contained normal layered structures embedded in the nuclear envelope and was often seen near the bud neck (Fig. 3C, panels b and b′). This was consistent with the existing functional SPB that forms the monopolar spindle, since it was capable of nucleating both cytoplasmic and nuclear microtubules (Fig. 3C, panels b and b′, arrows). The other SPB contained a partial SPB structure typically located at the tip of the thin nuclear envelope extension (Fig. 3C, panels c and c′). The structure resided on the cytoplasmic side of the nuclear envelope and was not able to nucleate nuclear microtubules. This defective SPB resembled a duplication plaque, and it was separated from the functional SPB by cytoplasmic microtubules that it could still form (40). The cytoplasmic microtubules are also likely to contribute to the abnormal shape of the nuclear envelope in these monopolar mutants by pulling the defective SPB with attached nuclear envelope away from the functional SPB (40). This SPB duplication defect observed in ndc1-39 cells is very similar to previously reported defects in ndc1-1, bbp1-1, and mps2-1 cells (32, 39, 40). The IEM data reported here are consistent with the results from the IF studies (Fig. 3B), and taken together, these results show that ndc1-39 cells are defective in insertion of the SPB during SPB duplication at 35°C.
ndc1-39 exhibits genetic interaction with nic96-1.
We sought to determine if ndc1-39 cells also exhibited phenotypes associated with the disruption of NPC functions in addition to SPB duplication defects. We first examined the genetic interactions between ndc1-39 and mutant alleles in candidate nucleoporins. The deletion of POM152 or POM34, genes that encode the other two pore membrane proteins besides NDC1 (28), showed neither suppression nor a synthetic lethal phenotype with ndc1-39 (data not shown). Similarly, ndc1-39 was not synthetically lethal with the nup192-15 mutation that causes NPC assembly defects (22; data not shown). However, ndc1-39 exhibited enhanced growth defects with another NPC assembly mutation, nic96-1 (44), at a semipermissive temperature (Fig. 4). While nic96-1 or ndc1-39 single mutants were able to grow at 30°C, double mutants were unable to grow (Fig. 4). This result demonstrates that NDC1 and NIC96 genetically interact and suggests that Ndc1p may be involved in NPC assembly or some other NPC-associated function.
ndc1-39 cells have normal nuclear protein import at the restrictive temperature.
A nuclear protein import assay was performed to check the NPC transport function in ndc1-39 cells. A galactose-inducible GFP construct that contained the nuclear localization signal from histone H2B1 (pJON280) was used as a reporter to determine if the GFP protein was properly translated and transported into the nucleus upon induction with galactose (31). Cells with a mutation in the PRP20 gene were used as a positive control for the phenotype since they have been shown to have nuclear protein import and mRNA export defects (21). Asynchronously growing NDC1, ndc1-39, and prp20-1 cells were shifted to 35°C for 5 h, at which time galactose was added for 2 h to induce the expression of the GFP reporter. The cells were then processed for fluorescence microscopy to determine the subcellular localization of the GFP reporter. The GFP signal coincided with DNA staining in both NDC1 (Fig. 5, first row) and ndc1-39 cells (Fig. 5, second row), indicating that the GFP reporter had been imported into the nucleus and that the transport function was normal in these cells. No GFP signal was observed in NDC1 or ndc1-39 cells before galactose induction (Fig. 5, third row; also data not shown). Note that ndc1-39 cells were shifted to 35°C for 5 h before galactose induction of the GFP reporter to ensure that Ndc1-39p was inactivated, as evidenced by the appearance of large-budded cells with only one mass of DNA (Fig. 5, second and third rows). No nuclear GFP signal was observed in the control prp20-1 cells (Fig. 5, fourth row) (21). In conclusion, ndc1-39 cells exhibit normal import of the induced GFP reporter protein into the nucleus and hence normal mRNA export from the nucleus at the restrictive temperature.
ndc1-39 cells have normal NPC distribution at the restrictive temperature.
Next, the distribution of NPCs was monitored by using a constitutively expressed GFP-tagged nucleoporin, Nup49p, as a marker for NPCs in NDC1, ndc1-39, and nup133Δ cells. nup133Δ cells were used as a positive control for the phenotype since these cells have been shown to have NPC distribution defects (2, 7). The cells were grown at 23 or 35°C for 3 to 4 h and then processed for fluorescence microscopy. A punctate perinuclear Nup49p-GFP signal was observed in both NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells at 35°C (Fig. 6, first and second rows). This indicates that NPCs were distributed normally in these cells. In contrast, Nup49p-GFP clustered as one or two spots in nup133Δ cells even at 23°C (Fig. 6, third row), as was expected because of their NPC distribution defects (2, 7). We conclude that there are no NPC distribution defects in ndc1-39 cells at the restrictive temperature (also see Fig. 8).
ndc1-39 cells fail to assemble Nup49p-GFP into NPCs at the restrictive temperature.
To determine if NPC assembly is affected in ndc1-39 mutants, we examined the incorporation of a newly synthesized nucleoporin into NPCs in an NPC assembly assay derived from a previously described method (11). NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells containing galactose-inducible GFP-tagged NUP49 were grown at 23 or 35°C, and galactose was added to the medium to induce the expression of Nup49p-GFP. The cells were then shifted to medium containing glucose to further repress the expression of Nup49p-GFP. The newly synthesized Nup49p-GFP was allowed to assemble into NPCs, and the distribution of Nup49p-GFP was visualized by fluorescence microscopy at various stages of the experiment (Fig. 7A). In NDC1 cells after galactose induction at 35°C, a punctate perinuclear Nup49p-GFP signal was readily observed (Fig. 7A, panel a), along with a faint signal throughout the cytoplasm. After the repression of Nup49p-GFP expression in the presence of glucose, 96% of the cells had incorporated Nup49p-GFP into NPCs, producing a punctate perinuclear signal (Fig. 7A, panel b). Interestingly, the majority of ndc1-39 cells had intense spots of Nup49p-GFP signals after galactose induction at 35°C (Fig. 7A, panels c and e, arrows), but some cells had a normal punctate perinuclear signal (Fig. 7A, panels c and e). The aggregate phenotype was more apparent after the cells were grown in glucose-containing medium. Sixty percent of the ndc1-39 cells had one or more intense Nup49p-GFP signals (Fig. 7A, panels d and f, arrows), leaving only 40% of the ndc1-39 cells with an apparent normal punctate perinuclear distribution of Nup49p-GFP (Fig. 7A, panels d and f). The Nup49p-GFP aggregates may represent Nup49p-GFP that is not properly assembled into NPCs. Quantification of the data is shown in Fig. 7B. In addition, 24% of ndc1-39 cells failed to assemble Nup49p-GFP into NPCs at 23°C (Fig. 7B). Western blot analysis indicated that Nup49p-GFP was expressed at the same level in both NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells at 35°C (data not shown).
We also examined the incorporation of Nup49p-GFP in ndc1-1 cells, in which NPC assembly has been shown to be normal, at the restrictive temperature of 15°C (11). The NPC assembly assay was performed at the permissive temperature of 30°C, similarly to the control experiment conducted at 23°C as described above. Only 11% of the ndc1-1 cells at 30°C and 20% of the ndc1-1 cells at 15°C failed to incorporate Nup49p-GFP properly into NPCs (Fig. 7B), compared to 60% of ndc1-39 cells at 35°C (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that the abnormal assembly of Nup49p-GFP into NPCs is specific to cells containing the ndc1-39 allele but not the ndc1-1 allele.
To better understand the nature of Nup49p-GFP aggregates in ndc1-39 cells, we processed NDC1 and ndc1-39 cells for IEM after growing them in glucose-containing medium at 35°C. Nup49p-GFP was immunolabeled with an anti-GFP primary antibody and a colloidal gold-conjugated secondary antibody (see Materials and Methods). In NDC1 cells, Nup49p-GFP gold particles were observed at the NPCs, as expected (Fig. 8A, arrows). The normal incorporation of Nup49p-GFP into the NPCs was also detected in some ndc1-39 cells (Fig. 8B and C, arrows). The NPCs appeared to be distributed normally in the nuclear envelope in the ndc1-39 cell shown (Fig. 8B), in which each of the five NPCs was labeled with at least one gold particle. Interestingly, cytoplasmic (Fig. 8C, arrowheads) and membrane-bound (Fig. 8D, arrowheads) aggregates that were labeled with gold particles were also observed. These aggregates are consistent with the intense GFP labeling seen by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 7B). Occasionally, we observed Nup49p-GFP at a nuclear pore and as an aggregate in the same cell (Fig. 8C). In summary, ndc1-39 cells exhibit defects in assembling Nup49p-GFP into NPCs at 35°C, by which a fraction of the Nup49p-GFP is misassembled and forms aggregates in the cell.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we investigated the role of Ndc1p, the only integral membrane protein that localizes to both the SPBs and NPCs, in both SPB duplication and NPC-associated functions by using a novel ts allele of NDC1, ndc1-39. We found that ndc1-39 cells are defective in SPB duplication and likely in NPC assembly at the restrictive temperature of 35°C, consistent with the idea that Ndc1p is required for the insertion of both the SPBs and NPCs into the nuclear envelope.
NDC1 functional domains.
We created seven serial NDC1 truncation proteins and found that only one small region, between amino acids 368 and 466, is dispensable for both NDC1 localization and function. This region does not contain any of the seven predicted transmembrane domains. The other six deletions of NDC1 rendered Ndc1p nonfunctional and did not localize properly. One possible explanation is that most of the truncation proteins lack one or two of the seven predicted transmembrane domains that are likely required for proper localization. Similarly, the mutations might have affected the topology of the protein in the nuclear envelope.
NDC1 in SPB duplication.
Ndc1-39p is expressed and localized similarly to the wild-type protein at the restrictive temperature. However, ndc1-39 cells are defective in SPB duplication in that the newly synthesized SPB is similar to the duplication plaque but fails to be inserted into the nuclear envelope. Consequently, these cells exhibit transient mitotic arrest due to failure in bipolar spindle formation, DNA segregation defects, and an increase-in-ploidy phenotype.
Interestingly, the ndc1-39 allele was found to be integrated two or more times in a tandem array as verified by Southern blot analysis. Cells containing a single copy of the ndc1-39 allele were not identified because the Ndc1p function in these cells might have been compromised at the permissive temperature such that single-copy integrants were sick or inviable. However, these defects would be overcome by slightly increasing the NDC1 gene dosage. Wild-type or mutant alleles of NDC1 are known to be very sensitive to gene dosage (10). Regardless of the copy number of the ndc1-39 allele, Ndc1-39p was expressed at a level similar to that of Ndc1p. In addition, ndc1-39 cells were healthy at the permissive temperature but still ts, thus allowing analysis of their mutant phenotypes at the restrictive temperature.
The study of ndc1-39 further validates the requirement for Ndc1p in the insertion step of the duplication plaque into the nuclear envelope during SPB duplication (see below for a proposed mechanism).
NDC1 in NPC assembly.
The existing alleles for NDC1, ndc1-1 (11) and ndc1-39, do not reveal a role for NDC1 in nuclear transport or in the distribution of NPCs in the nuclear envelope. However, Ndc1p seems to be involved in NPC assembly, since ndc1-39 mutants showed an enhanced growth defect in combination with nic96-1 mutants and had Nup49p-GFP assembly defects.
Even though the precise mechanism of NPC assembly is not known, studies from vertebrate systems suggest that the two pore membrane proteins, POM121 and gp210, play an important role during NPC assembly (3, 8, 13, 34, 36). The membrane proteins could trigger pore formation by facilitating the fusion of the inner and outer membranes of the nuclear envelope and allowing the assembly of other nucleoporins. Although there are no POM121 and gp210 homologues in yeast, the pore membrane proteins Ndc1p, Pom152p, and Pom34p could perform analogous functions (28). However, unlike NDC1, cells grow normally when POM152 or POM34 is deleted (42).
We propose that the essential integral membrane protein Ndc1p functions similarly during both SPB duplication and NPC assembly. Ndc1p could mediate the fusion between the inner and outer nuclear membranes by interacting with itself or other proteins to stabilize the fenestra in the nuclear envelope, thus allowing the assembly of nucleoporins at the NPCs or the insertion of the duplication plaque and the recruitment of nuclear SPB components to the SPBs. However, attempts to identify SPB or NPC components that interact with Ndc1p biochemically have not been successful thus far. It is also not known whether the assembly of other nucleoporins or nuclear pore subcomplexes, in addition to that of NUP49, is affected in ndc1-39 cells.
In NPC assembly mutants such as nic96-1 and nup192-15 (7, 15, 22, 44), a decrease in NPC numbers and a marked decrease in the autofluorescence level of endogenously expressed Nup49p-GFP are observed as these cells continue to divide for several generations at the restrictive temperature, and the preexisting NPCs are titrated into daughter cells after each cell division. The number of NPCs did not seem to decrease in ndc1-39 cells during the first cell cycle upon shifting to the restrictive temperature, since we observed a wild-type level of Nup49p-GFP signal in ndc1-39 cells. The number of NPCs and the signal of endogenously expressed Nup49p-GFP might have decreased if ndc1-39 cells were able to continue cycling at the restrictive temperature. However, it is not possible to determine if the number of NPCs decreased in ndc1-39 cells in subsequent cell cycles at the restrictive temperature because these cells failed in SPB duplication and went through lethal mitosis during the first cell cycle. Nonetheless, by a different method of monitoring NPC assembly using galactose-inducible Nup49p-GFP, we were able to demonstrate the potential involvement of Ndc1p in NPC assembly that could not be detected otherwise.
Sixty percent of the ndc1-39 cells had defects in incorporating Nup49p-GFP into NPCs at the restrictive temperature, as indicated by the presence of Nup49p-GFP aggregates instead of the normal punctate perinuclear signal. We do not believe that the Nup49p-GFP assembly defect seen in ndc1-39 cells at the restrictive temperature is a secondary effect due to a failure in SPB duplication and arrest in mitosis, since ndc1-1 cells exhibited SPB duplication defects but no effects on NPC assembly, consistent with a previous analysis of ndc1-1 (11). By IEM, aggregates of Nup49p-GFP observed in ndc1-39 cells at the restrictive temperature often did not reside at the nuclear pores, but rather were located in the cytoplasm or a membrane-bound structure (Fig. 8D). Neither the cytoplasmic aggregates nor the membrane-limited structures were observed when Nup49p-GFP was induced in wild-type cells. The membranes may represent an expansion of the nuclear envelope or the endoplasmic reticulum. However, in our preparation, we did not detect the double membrane lamella structure observed when Nup53p is overexpressed (24). It is possible that these aggregates of Nup49p-GFP represent NPC assembly intermediates.
Interestingly, 40% of the ndc1-39 cells seemed to incorporate newly synthesized Nup49p-GFP into the NPCs normally (Fig. 8B). There are several possibilities to explain why Nup49p-GFP assembly was not defective in all ndc1-39 cells. First, the punctate perinuclear Nup49p-GFP signal observed could reflect the exchange of newly synthesized Nup49p-GFP into the preexisting functional NPCs instead of de novo NPC synthesis (2, 6). Another possibility is that in some of the cells, Ndc1-39p was not fully inactivated at the time when synthesis of Nup49p-GFP was induced, or there may have been a lag from the time that Ndc1-39p became nonfunctional to the time when the mutant phenotype was observed. A third possibility is that Nup49p-GFP was incorporated into partially formed or nonfunctional NPCs that still appeared to be embedded in the nuclear envelope and that cannot be distinguished from normal NPCs in our assay.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that NDC1, encoding the only essential integral nuclear envelope membrane protein common to both SPBs and NPCs, is required for SPB duplication and possibly for NPC assembly. We also provided evidence to support the idea that Ndc1p is important for the insertion of both organelles into the nuclear envelope and that it serves as an important link for understanding the biogenesis of SPBs and NPCs.
Acknowledgments
We thank Don Cleveland, Jason Kahana, Pamela Silver, and Susan Wente for various reagents. We also thank Harold Fisk and Michele Jones for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM-59992 (to M.W.) and National Institutes of Health training grant GM-07135 (to C.K.L.).
REFERENCES
- 1.Adams, I. R., and J. V. Kilmartin. 2000. Spindle pole body duplication: a model for centrosome duplication? Trends Cell Biol. 10:329-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Belgareh, N., and V. Doye. 1997. Dynamics of nuclear pore distribution in nucleoporin mutant yeast cells. J. Cell Biol. 136:747-759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bodoor, K., S. Shaikh, D. Salina, W. H. Raharjo, R. Bastos, M. Lohka, and B. Burke. 1999. Sequential recruitment of NPC proteins to the nuclear periphery at the end of mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 112:2253-2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boeke, J. D., J. Trueheart, G. Natsoulis, and G. R. Fink. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 154:164-175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brachmann, C. B., A. Davies, G. J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J. D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bucci, M., and S. R. Wente. 1997. In vivo dynamics of nuclear pore complexes in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 136:1185-1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bucci, M., and S. R. Wente. 1998. A novel fluorescence-based genetic strategy identifies mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for nuclear pore complex assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:2439-2461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burke, B., and J. Ellenberg. 2002. Remodelling the walls of the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:487-497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castillo, A. R., J. B. Meehl, G. Morgan, A. Schutz-Geschwender, and M. Winey. 2002. The yeast protein kinase Mps1p is required for assembly of the integral spindle pole body component Spc42p. J. Cell Biol. 156:453-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chial, H. J., T. H. Giddings, Jr., E. A. Siewert, M. A. Hoyt, and M. Winey. 1999. Altered dosage of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene, NDC1, leads to aneuploidy and polyploidy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10200-10205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chial, H. J., M. P. Rout, T. H. Giddings, Jr., and M. Winey. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ndc1p is a shared component of nuclear pore complexes and spindle pole bodies. J. Cell Biol. 143:1789-1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chial, H. J., and M. Winey. 1999. Mechanisms of genetic instability revealed by analysis of yeast spindle pole body duplication. Biol. Cell 91:439-450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Drummond, S. P., and K. L. Wilson. 2002. Interference with the cytoplasmic tail of gp210 disrupts “close opposition” of nuclear membranes and blocks nuclear pore dilation. J. Cell Biol. 158:53-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Giddings, T. H., Jr., E. T. O'Toole, M. Morphew, D. N. Mastronarde, J. R. McIntosh, and M. Winey. 2001. Using rapid freeze and freeze-substitution for the preparation of yeast cells for electron microscopy and three-dimensional analysis. Methods Cell Biol. 67:27-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gomez-Ospina, N., G. Morgan, T. H. Giddings, Jr., B. Kosova, E. Hurt, and M. Winey. 2000. Yeast nuclear pore complex assembly defects determined by nuclear envelope reconstruction. J. Struct. Biol. 132:1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guthrie, C., and G. R. Fink (ed.). 2002. Methods in enzymology, vol. 350. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular and cell biology. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, Calif.
- 17.Hutter, K. J., and H. E. Eipel. 1979. Microbial determinations by flow cytometry. J. Gen. Microbiol. 113:369-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jaspersen, S. L., T. H. Giddings, Jr., and M. Winey. 2002. Mps3p is a novel component of the yeast spindle pole body that interacts with the yeast centrin homologue Cdc31p. J. Cell Biol. 159:945-956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kilmartin, J. V. 2003. Sfi1p has conserved centrin-binding sites and an essential function in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication. J. Cell Biol. 162:1211-1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Knop, M., K. Siegers, G. Pereira, W. Zachariae, B. Winsor, K. Nasmyth, and E. Schiebel. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15:963-972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koepp, D. M., D. H. Wong, A. H. Corbett, and P. A. Silver. 1996. Dynamic localization of the nuclear import receptor and its interactions with transport factors. J. Cell Biol. 133:1163-1176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kosova, B., N. Pante, C. Rollenhagen, and E. Hurt. 1999. Nup192p is a conserved nucleoporin with a preferential location at the inner site of the nuclear membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 274:22646-22651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kunkel, T. A., J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367-382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marelli, M., C. P. Lusk, H. Chan, J. D. Aitchison, and R. W. Wozniak. 2001. A link between the synthesis of nucleoporins and the biogenesis of the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 153:709-723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mutvei, A., S. Dihlmann, W. Herth, and E. C. Hurt. 1992. NSP1 depletion in yeast affects nuclear pore formation and nuclear accumulation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 59:280-295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.O'Toole, E. T., M. Winey, and J. R. McIntosh. 1999. High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:2017-2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rothstein, R. 1991. Targeting, disruption, replacement, and allele rescue: integrative DNA transformation in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:281-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rout, M. P., J. D. Aitchison, A. Suprapto, K. Hjertaas, Y. Zhao, and B. T. Chait. 2000. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148:635-651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ryan, K. J., J. M. McCaffery, and S. R. Wente. 2003. The Ran GTPase cycle is required for yeast nuclear pore complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 160:1041-1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ryan, K. J., and S. R. Wente. 2002. Isolation and characterization of new Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants perturbed in nuclear pore complex assembly. BMC Genet. 3:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schlenstedt, G., C. Saavedra, J. D. J. Loeb, C. N. Cole, and P. A. Silver. 1995. The GTP-bound form of the yeast RAN/TC4 homologue blocks nuclear protein import and appearance of poly(A)+ RNA in the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:225-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schramm, C., S. Elliott, A. Shevchenko, A. Shevchenko, and E. Schiebel. 2000. The Bbp1p-Mps2p complex connects the SPB to the nuclear envelope and is essential for SPB duplication. EMBO J. 19:421-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Suntharalingam, M., and S. R. Wente. 2003. Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. Dev. Cell 4:775-789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomas, J. H., and D. Botstein. 1986. A gene required for the separation of chromosomes on the spindle apparatus in yeast. Cell 44:65-76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vasu, S. K., and D. J. Forbes. 2001. Nuclear pores and nuclear assembly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:363-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wach, A., A. Brachat, R. Pohlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1793-1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.West, R. R., E. V. Vaisberg, R. Ding, P. Nurse, and J. R. McIntosh. 1998. cut11+: a gene required for cell cycle-dependent spindle pole body anchoring in the nuclear envelope and bipolar spindle formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:2839-2855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Winey, M., L. Goetsch, P. Baum, and B. Byers. 1991. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J. Cell Biol. 114:745-754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Winey, M., M. A. Hoyt, C. Chan, L. Goetsch, D. Botstein, and B. Byers. 1993. NDC1: a nuclear periphery component required for yeast spindle pole body duplication. J. Cell Biol. 122:743-751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Winey, M., D. Yarar, T. H. Giddings, Jr., and D. N. Mastronarde. 1997. Nuclear pore complex number and distribution throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle by three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of nuclear envelopes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:2119-2132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wozniak, R. W., G. Blobel, and M. P. Rout. 1994. POM152 is an integral protein of the pore membrane domain of the yeast nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 125:31-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang, Q., M. P. Rout, and C. W. Akey. 1998. Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. Mol. Cell 1:223-234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zabel, U., V. Doye, H. Tekotte, R. Wepf, P. Grandi, and E. C. Hurt. 1996. Nic96p is required for nuclear pore formation and functionally interacts with a novel nucleoporin, Nup188p. J. Cell Biol. 133:1141-1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zeng, X., J. A. Kahana, P. A. Silver, M. K. Morphew, J. R. McIntosh, T. T. Finch, J. Carbon, and W. S. Saunders. 1999. Slk19p is a centromere protein that functions to stabilize mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol. 146:415-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]