Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2004 May;186(9):2862–2871. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.9.2862-2871.2004

Genome of Staphylococcal Phage K: a New Lineage of Myoviridae Infecting Gram-Positive Bacteria with a Low G+C Content

S O'Flaherty 1,2,3, A Coffey 4, R Edwards 5, W Meaney 2, G F Fitzgerald 3,6, R P Ross 1,6,*
PMCID: PMC387793  PMID: 15090528

Abstract

Phage K is a polyvalent phage of the Myoviridae family which is active against a wide range of staphylococci. Phage genome sequencing revealed a linear DNA genome of 127,395 bp, which carries 118 putative open reading frames. The genome is organized in a modular form, encoding modules for lysis, structural proteins, DNA replication, and transcription. Interestingly, the structural module shows high homology to the structural module from Listeria phage A511, suggesting intergenus horizontal transfer. In addition, phage K exhibits the potential to encode proteins necessary for its own replisome, including DNA ligase, primase, helicase, polymerase, RNase H, and DNA binding proteins. Phage K has a complete absence of GATC sites, making it insensitive to restriction enzymes which cleave this sequence. Three introns (lys-I1, pol-I2, and pol-I3) encoding putative endonucleases were located in the genome. Two of these (pol-I2 and pol-I3) were found to interrupt the DNA polymerase gene, while the other (lys-I1) interrupts the lysin gene. Two of the introns encode putative proteins with homology to HNH endonucleases, whereas the other encodes a 270-amino-acid protein which contains two zinc fingers (CX2CX22CX2C and CX2CX23CX2C). The availability of the genome of this highly virulent phage, which is active against infective staphylococci, should provide new insights into the biology and evolution of large broad-spectrum polyvalent phages.


Myoviridae are a diverse group of phages that are characterized by their contractile tails. Myoviridae are able to infect both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) classification is so broad that the Myoviridae have been separated into several classes, i.e., T4-like viruses, P1-like viruses, P2-like viruses, Mu-like viruses, SP01-like viruses, PBS1-like viruses, and φH-like viruses (42). These phage classes exhibit many differences in their lifestyles. For example, P1 lysogenizes as a plasmid, Mu is a transposon and does not undergo site-specific recombination like P2, and T4 is a lytic phage. Some of the phage infect gram-positive bacteria, some infect gram-negative bacteria, and some infect archaea (42). The genomes of these phages vary in size from at least 30,000 to 170,000 bp, and there is no molecular basis for these ICTV classifications. The phages are called Myoviridae merely because they look alike. In the postgenomic era, we need to move towards a classification system that takes into account the molecular characteristics that are shared between members of the different phage families. The data that we present below challenge the idea that these should all be members of the same family, using a molecular mechanism of categorizing the phage.

Phage K is a member of the family Myoviridae and has been the subject of previous preliminary studies which focused on the adsorption and infection processes, the effect of acridines on phage reproduction, morphology, and the nature of phage K DNA replication (17-19, 32-34). This bacteriophage has activity against a range of both coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive staphylococci (37) and uses N-acetylglucosamine in cell wall teichoic acid for phage adsorption (10). Phage K is also identical to the phage named Au2 examined by Burnet and Lush (7), and restriction analysis in our laboratory revealed that it is indistinguishable from the polyvalent phage 812 (31).

Generally, phage genomes are organized in modular structures, with each module containing a set of genes which carry out a biological function (9). Phage evolution can occur by the exchange of modules between phages which have access to the same gene pool (5). The evolution of lactococcal and streptococcal phages of the family Siphoviridae has been studied extensively (6, 12-14, 25); however, this has not been the case with phages of the Myoviridae. As more Myoviridae genomes are sequenced and analyzed, it should become more evident that phage K may represent a new genus infecting gram-positive bacteria with a low G+C content.

A notable feature of some large phage genomes is the presence of introns. Phage-carried group I introns are typically found interrupting genes involved in DNA metabolism, in contrast to chromosomally located introns, which are generally found interrupting structural RNA genes (15).

In this communication we analyze the phage K genome with respect to its organization, regulation, and evolution, and we also confirm experimentally the presence of three introns and determine their insertion sites. Unusually, the DNA polymerase gene is interrupted by two distinct introns, and another is found interrupting the lysin gene. Each of the three introns also encodes putative endonucleases. Another surprising feature of the genome is that the structural module bears high similarity to the structural module from Listeria phage A511. The elucidation of the genome of this phage will provide an insight into phage classification, genome organization, and intron invasion in a phage with considerable potential in phage therapy applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Phage propagation.

Phage K was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 19685-B1). Phage K was routinely propagated on Staphylococcus aureus DPC5246 in brain heart infusion broth. Concentrated phage K preparations were obtained by CsCl density gradient centrifugation following polyethylene glycol 8000 precipitation of brain heart infusion lysates. The protocols used were in accordance with those described previously (38). Phage preparations were dialyzed in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) and filter sterilized prior to use.

DNA sequencing and sequence analysis.

DNA sequencing was performed to 12-fold redundancy with the LI-COR 4200L automated DNA sequencer and dye primer chemistry with a cycle sequencing protocol (MWG-Biotech AG, Ebersberg, Germany). The sequence assembly was checked for correctness by comparison with restriction data obtained by using several restriction enzymes. The data indicated that while the assembly was correct, sequences from the ends were missing. Despite attempts at ligation-mediated PCR, the sequences of these ends could not be determined. Sequence analysis was performed as described earlier (30), using DNAStar (Madison, Wis.) software. Open reading frames (ORFs) preceded by a Shine-Dalgarno sequence at an appropriate distance (3 to 18 bp) from the initiation codon and coding for proteins of at least 100 amino acids were considered putative genes. ORFs were identified, translated, and searched against the protein database by using the BLAST (1) and PSI-BLAST (2) algorithms. Clustal alignments of sequences were performed with the DNAStar software.

Preparation of phage DNA.

Phage K DNA was extracted from a CsCl-purified (see above) phage stock solution (300 μl; >109 PFU/ml) as follows. DNA was incubated at 37°C for 30 min with RNase (10 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dublin, Ireland), the mixture was adjusted to 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 6 μl of EDTA (0.5 M) and 6 μl of proteinase K (10 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich) were added, followed by incubation for 1 h at 37°C. All proteinaceous material was removed by using phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) (Sigma-Aldrich), and DNA was extracted and precipitated as described previously (38).

Preparation of phage proteins, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and N-terminal sequencing.

A concentrated CsCl phage K preparation (1 ml) was precipitated by adding 4 volumes of ice-cold acetone. Samples were centrifuged at 1,600 × g for 20 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was allowed to air dry. The pellet was then resuspended in 100 μl of sample buffer (2 ml of 10% SDS, 0.2 ml of 0.5% bromophenol blue, 1.25 ml of 0.5 M Tris HCl [pH 6.8], and 2.5 ml of glycerol, made up to 9.5 ml with deionized water; 50 μl of β-mercaptoethanol was added to 950 μl of this solution prior to use). Samples were boiled for 3 min before being loaded onto polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were electrotransferred from polyacrylamide gels onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad Corp., Richmond, Calif.), in buffer A (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% methanol [pH 8.3]), using a Trans-Blot cell (Bio-Rad, Alpha Technologies, Dublin, Ireland), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Proteins were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250, cut out of the membrane, and sequenced on a Beckman LF 3000 microsequencer (Molecular Biology Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne). Database searches were performed with the program BLASTP and against the phage K genome.

Total RNA isolation.

Staphylococcal strain DPC 5246 was grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.50 and then infected with phage K at a multiplicity of infection of >10. Twenty-milliliter samples were removed, pelleted, and frozen immediately in a −80°C ethanol bath at 10, 20, and 30 min after phage infection. Total RNA was isolated by resuspending each pellet in 2 ml of TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and transferring the mixture to two 2.0-ml screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes containing 0.8 g of acid-washed beads (106 μm in diameter) (Sigma-Aldrich). The slurry was sheared with a Mini-Beadbeater-8 cell disrupter (Stratech Scientific Ltd., Bedfordshire, United Kingdom) for three 1-min cycles (and chilled on ice between cycles). The remainder of the RNA isolation procedure was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. Residual DNA was removed by using a DNA-free kit (Ambion Ltd., Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.). Standard procedures to minimize RNase contamination were used (38).

Synthesis of cDNA.

Total RNA was isolated as described above, 30 min after phage infection. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed as follows. Two micrograms of RNA was incubated with 3 μg of random primer (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom.) per ml in a final volume of 11 μl for 10 min at 70°C. Samples were snap frozen in a −80°C ethanol bath and briefly spun by centrifugation. The primer extension reaction was carried out at 42°C overnight following the addition of 1 μl of a 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate master mix (Bioline Ltd., London, United Kingdom), 1 μl (200 U) of Superscript II reverse transcriptase, 2 μl (0.1 M) dithiothreitol, and 4 μl of 5× first-strand buffer (Invitrogen). The primer extension reaction was inactivated by heating the samples to 70°C for 15 min.

Determination of intron splice junctions.

PCR amplifications were performed in a 100-μl reaction mix with 2 μg of cDNA-DNA, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 pmol of each primer, and 1U of Taq polymerase (Bioline Ltd.). The PCR primers used in this study were purchased from MWG-Biotech UK, Ltd. (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom). The sequences of relevant primers used for PCR are as follows: LysF, 5′ AAC TGC AGT ATT ACG GAG GAT TTA AAA TGG CTA AGG AC TCA AGC 3′; LysR, 5′ GCT CTG ACT ATT TGA ATA CTC CCC AGG C 3′; PolF, 5′ AAC TGC AGA GGA GGA ATT AAA TGA AAG TAT TAA TC 3′; and PolR, 5′ GCT CTA GAT ATT AAA TTT CTT GAT AAA TAT G 3′. Negative control PCRs with no template DNA were also performed. Samples were subjected to denaturation (94°C for 1 min), annealing (50°C for 1 min), and elongation (72°C for 1 min) for 35 cycles with a Hybaid PCR express unit. Amplified DNA fragments from cDNA were purified from a 1% agarose gel by using a QIAquick gel purification kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, United Kingdom), cloned in the pCR2.1-TOPO vector, and transformed in One ShotTOP 10 chemically competent Escherichia coli by using a TOPO TA cloning kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Primers from pCR2.1-TOPO (M13F and M13R) were used to determine the splice junctions for the intron interrupting the lysin gene. Internal primers that correspond to sequence surrounding the second two introns interrupting the DNA polymerase gene were designed as follows: Int1F, 5′ GAT ATT ACC GCA TGG ACT TA 3′; Int1R, 5′ AAC ATC ATA CTC TTT CTT AGC 3′; Int2F, 5′ GCT AAT GTT AAA GAA GCA GAC 3′; and Int2R, 5′ ACT CAT GTA CAT TG T CAA TAG 3′. Sequencing reactions were performed twice on two different pCR2.1-TOPO clones for each intron by Lark Technologies Inc., Essex, United Kingdom.

Phylogenetic analysis.

The phylogenetic analysis was performed essentially as described previously (36). Briefly, every ORF in phage K was compared to every other ORF from the complete phage genome database maintained by Rohwer and Edwards. The database currently contains 375 phage genomes, including both free-living phages and prophages. All similar proteins are aligned, and a protein distance matrix is calculated from each alignment. The matrices are averaged, and the tree is calculated from the average protein distance matrix (R. Edwards and F. Rohwer, unpublished data).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of phage K has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession number AY176327.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

General features of the genome of phage K.

The phage K genome is presented as a 127,395-bp contiguous sequence of linear double-stranded DNA which carries at least 118 putative ORFs, which were capable of encoding peptides of at least 100 amino acids in all six reading frames preceded by a potential Shine-Dalgarno sequence at a distance of at least 3 to 18 bp from a start codon (AUG, GUG, or UUG) (Table 1). The majority of the ORFs (112) initiate translation with the AUG start codon, whereas only 5 (ORFs 38, 40, 41, 42, and 96) initiate translation with the UUG start codon and 1 (ORF 63) initiates with a GUG start codon (Table 1). Bioinformatic analysis of ORFs revealed that the majority exhibited low identities with proteins from the database (Table 1), which often is the case with new genomes. We suspect that the phage has terminally redundant ends, based on the following lines of evidence. First, it has previously been shown that the genome is linear, is not circularly permuted, and does not possess cohesive ends (32). Second, the extreme ends of this phage could not be sequenced, which may be due to the physical nature of the ends of the genome. The genome can be divided into two distinct regions, which are divergently transcribed as indicated by bioinformatic analysis. In this respect, of the 118 ORFs, 85 are transcribed in one orientation and 33 are transcribed in the opposite orientation, with all of the latter grouped together in the first 30 kb, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Phage K has a G+C content of 30.6%, which is significantly lower than that generally associated with the staphylococcal bacterial genome (22).

TABLE 1.

General features of putative ORFs from phage K with best matches in the database

ORFa bp
Protein size (kDa) Representative similarity to proteins in database e value % Identity (% match of length) Accession no.
Start Stop
1* 2934 2449 18.4 Hypothetical protein
2* 3358 2927 16.7 Hypothetical protein
3 3914 3372 21.5 Hypothetical protein
4* 4414 3926 19.5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa conserved hypothetical protein 3e-24 39 (40) NP_253270
5* 4825 4427 16.1 Hypothetical protein
6* 5529 4822 27.7 Agrobacterium tumefaciens serine/threonine protein phosphatase I 2e-13 29 (26) NP_534038
7*‡ 6183 5629 21.2 Hypothetical protein
8*‡ 8050 7502 21.9 Hypothetical protein
9* 9194 8457 28.7 Hypothetical protein
10* 10003 9614 15.2 Hypothetical protein
11*‡ 10798 10316 18.8 Hypothetical protein
12*‡ 11390 10848 20.4 Hypothetical protein
13* 11923 11390 20.7 Hypothetical protein
14* 13213 12368 31.7 Hypothetical protein
15* 13809 13225 21.9 Mycoplasma penetrans AAA family ATPase 5e-20 40 (32) NP_757966
16* 15233 14817 16 Hypothetical protein
17*‡ 15669 15367 11.3 Enterococcus hirae ArpR 6e-18 45 (45) CAA90708
18* 18110 16062 79.8 Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1 unknown protein 3e-04 28 (6) AAL59463
19*‡ 19226 18648 21.4 Hypothetical protein
20* 19845 19219 23.8 Hypothetical protein
21* 20734 19838 35 Clostridium acetobutylicum homolog of eukaryotic DNA ligase III 3e-05 27 (14) NP_347388
22* 21767 21027 28.6 Neisseria meningitidis PhoH-related protein 1e-14 36 (38) NP_273886
23* 22433 21819 23 Staphylococcus aureus temperate phage phiSLT ORF 636 0.51 26 (18) NP_075517
24* 22874 22449 15.8 Clostridium perfringens ribonuclease H1 7e-14 34 (34) NP_562366
25* 23719 23078 24.6 Hypothetical protein
26*‡ 24971 24279 24.8 S. aureus hypothetical protein 7e-07 29 (25) NP_372619
27* 25793 25158 24.8 Streptococcus pyogenes hypothetical phage protein 2e-22 36 (37) NP_607354
28*‡ 26651 25860 29.3 Synechocystis sp., unknown protein 1e-15 24 (20) NP_440390
29* 26959 26651 12.2 Hypothetical protein
30‡ 27701 27072 23.1 S. aureus autolysin (N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase) 1e-54 52 (52) P24556
31* 28472 27972 19.2 Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron endonuclease 1e-12 39 (33) NP_810939
32* 29435 28632 29.8 S. aureus phage Twort N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase 1e-38 40 (37) CAA69021
33* 29938 29435 18.1 S. aureus phage Twort holTW (holin) 9e-38 61 (53) CAA69020
34* 34507 34833 12.3 Hypothetical protein
35* 34848 36665 70.2 Ralstonia solanacearum probable bacteriophage-related protein 0.002 25 (8) NP_518974
36* 36658 37479 30.7 Hypothetical protein
37*‡ 37636 38115 18.5 Hypothetical protein
38*†‡ 38157 39350 43.6 Bacillus cereus cell surface protein 3e-05 28 (24) NP_346725
39* 39435 39776 12.8 Hypothetical protein
40† 39794 40165 14.5 Hypothetical protein
41*†‡ 40169 41860 64.0 Escherichia coli bacteriophage P27 putative portal protein 0.004 22 (10) NP_543090
42*† 42054 42827 28.6 Listeria monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 1 2e-62 54 (63) CAA62538
43* 42846 43796 35.7 Hypothetical protein
44‡ 43912 45303 51.2 S. aureus phage Twort capsid protein 0.0 82 (81) AAQ6728
L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 major capsid protein c-174 66 (67) CAA62540
45* 45704 46612 31.2 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 3 e-104 60 (36) CAA62541
46* 46626 47504 33.7 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 4 8e-56 26 (9) CAA62542
47* 47504 48124 23.8 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 5 2e-25 46 (35) CAA62543
48* 48143 48979 31.8 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 6 6e-53 38 (39) CAA62544
49* 49223 50986 54.5 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 major tail sheath protein 0.0 57 (58) CAA62546
50*‡ 51059 51487 15.9 S. aureus Phage twort unknown protein 3e-62 85 (84) AF132670
L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 8 5e-48 68 (67) CAA62547
51* 51767 52225 18.1 Hypothetical protein
52* 52514 52825 12.3 Hypothetical protein
53* 52957 53415 18.1 L. monocytogenes bacteriophage A511 ORF 9 1e-23 39 (39) CAA62548
54*‡ 53459 53995 20.9 Hypothetical protein
55 54051 58106 144 Lactococcus lactis bacteiophage CP-1 ORF 18 4e-08 32 (3) NP_047298
56 58185 60611 91.2 Staphylococcus epidermidis secretory antigen SsaA-like protein 4e-32 49 (13) NP_765044
57* 60625 61512 34.6 Hypothetical protein
58* 61512 64058 96.1 Bacillus subtilis glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase 1e-41 38 (11) NP_388095
59* 64165 64956 29.3 Hypothetical protein
60* 64956 65480 20 Hypothetical protein
61* 65480 66184 26.6 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi putative bacteriophage baseplate protein 0.020 45 (7) NP_456045
62 66199 67245 39.2 Clostridium tetani phage-like element PBSx protein XkdT 5e-06 24 (43) NP_782676
63† 67266 70325 116.2 Hypothetical protein
64 70436 70957 19.2 Hypothetical protein
65*‡ 70978 74436 129 Dichelobacter nodosus YrlC protein 9e-33 27 (10) T17382
66* 74644 76566 72.5 S. aureus SLT ORF 488-like protein 0.021 29 (4) AAL82326
67* 76589 76963 14.6 Hypothetical protein
68*‡ 76970 78346 50.4 L. monocytogenes lmo1188 0.034 24 (8) NP_464713
69* 78438 80186 37.2 S. enterica serovar Typhi putative helicase 2e-36 33 (16) NP_569550
70* 80198 81811 63.2 E. faecalis putative Rep protein 0.031 40 (5) CAC29157
71* 81804 83246 54.6 S. enterica serovar Typhi putative DNA helicase 4e-11 21 (15) NP_569513
72 83325 84362 40.1 L. monocytogenes protein similar to putative exonuclease SbcD 1c-09 23 (19) NP_465171
73* 84362 84739 14.9 Hypothetical protein
74* 84739 86658 73.4 Yersinia pestis plasmid pMT1 probable exonuclease 2c-21 34 (9) T14925
75* 86658 87254 23.2 Hypothetical protein
76* 87269 88336 40.9 Helicobacter pylori DNA primase 5e-07 24 (17) NP_206814
77* 88741 89193 17 Hypothetical protein
78 89180 89788 23.6 Bacteriophage T5 D14 protein 1e-05 26 (17) O48499
79* 89805 90197 14.7 Staphylococcus epidermidis NrdI protein 3e-13 35 (50) NP_764067
80 90212 92326 80.2 S. aureus phage Twort large ribonucleotide reductase subunit 0.0 72 (73) AAM00816
81 92340 93389 40.4 S. aureus ribonucleoside reductase minor subunit 3e-84 53 (48) NP_371256
82* 93407 93736 12.4 Hypothetical protein
83 93720 94040 12 Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius thioredoxin 0.013 33 (31) P80579
84 94247 94843 23.5 Hypothetical protein
85*‡ 94853 95158 11.9 Chlamydophila pneumoniae integration host factor alpha 0.003 26 (26) NP_224616
86* 95234 96106 33.2 B. subtilis bacteriophage SPO1 DNA polymerase 0.054 25 (12) P30314
87* 96314 96784 18.6 Hypothetical protein
88 96920 98263 52.8 Thermotoga maritima DNA-directed DNA polymerase I 1e-06 22 (13) NP_229419
89 98429 99238 31.2 Bacteriophage bastille HNH endonuclease I-BasI 6e-22 40 (40) AAO93095
90 99472 100332 32.9 B. subtilis phage SPO1 DNA-directed DNA polymerase 2e-31 36 (31) JC1269
91* 100660 101142 18.9 Hypothetical protein
92*‡ 101229 102500 46.9 Hypothetical protein
93* 102560 103816 46.8 T. maritima DNA repair protein 2e-27 30 (24) NP_229655
94* 104160 104822 26.6 B. subtilis bacteriophage SPO1 RNA polymerase sigma GP34 factor 3e-05 32 (17) P06227
95* 104950 105582 23.2 Hypothetical protein
96*‡† 105605 106117 17.8 S. aureus temperate phage phiSLT major tail protein 4e-14 40 (49) NP_075510
97* 106719 107474 29.2 Hypothetical protein
98 107467 108717 47.5 Hypothetical protein
99 108731 109099 14 Hypothetical protein
100*‡ 109086 109397 12 Hypothetical protein
101* 109990 110757 30 S. aureus hypothetical protein 0.001 36 (16) CAB60746
102* 110735 111181 17.3 Hypothetical protein
103* 112416 113417 28.4 Hypothetical protein
104* 113165 113623 17.9 Hypothetical protein
105* 113688 114131 17.5 Hypothetical protein
106*‡ 114148 114852 27.4 Hypothetical protein
107*‡ 114914 115312 15.4 Hypothetical protein
108*‡ 115706 116176 17.9 Hypothetical protein
109* 117041 117349 12 Hypothetical protein
110* 117346 118254 35.2 Pyrococcus horikoshii ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase 8c-09 27 (24) NP_143754
111*‡ 118272 119741 56.1 Haemophilus ducreyi putative nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase e-141 52 (52) AAK06405
112* 120082 120477 15.5 Hypothetical protein
113 121090 121401 11.7 Hypothetical protein
114* 121407 121706 11.6 Hypothetical protein
115* 122253 122606 13.9 Hypothetical protein
116* 122625 123011 15.6 Hypothetical protein
117* 124587 124913 12.7 Hypothetical protein
118* 125811 126158 13.7 Hypothetical protein
a

†, non-AUG start codons; ‡, presence of putative rho-independent terminators downstream of the ORF; *, good ribosome binding sites upstream of the start codon.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

ORF organization of phage K. ORFs 1 to 118 are indicated by arrows; the numbering corresponds to that in Table 1. Blue arrows, putative lysis module; red arrows, structural module; green arrows, DNA replication and transcription module; grey arrows, proteins with a putative function; black arrows, hypothetical proteins. Arrows with black vertical lines indicate three intron-carried ORFs. Arrows are roughly drawn to scale. Vertical lines mark two putative promoters. L and R, direction of transcription (left or right). Start codons and ribosome binding sites are indicated in boldface, and putative −10 and −35 sites are underlined. Dashed vertical lines represent the positions of four putative tRNAs.

Lack of restriction sites for host-encoded endonucleases.

Analysis of the phage genome revealed no significant homology to any DNA methylases (Table 1). However, an interesting feature of the phage K genome is that it completely lacks GATC sites and so should not be restricted by Sau3A1, BamHI, PvuI, and DpnI. A paucity of restriction sites has also been observed in phages which infect lactococci (29). Phage K and a second staphylococcal phage (phage CS1, isolated recently in our laboratory) were subjected to digestion with the restriction enzyme Sau3A1. Phage CS1 was digested by Sau3A1, yielding numerous fragments, whereas, as expected, phage K was not digested (data not shown). S. aureus is known to encode a Sau3A1 restriction-modification system which recognizes the 5′-GATC-3′ DNA sequence (40). A second site-specific endonuclease from S. aureus, which recognizes the sequence 5′-GGNCC-3′, was identified (41). Interestingly, there is only one 5′-GGTCC-3′ site in the genome of phage K; none of the other possible recognition site combinations (5′-GGGCC-3′, 5′-GGACC-3′, or 5′-GGCCC3′) are present. Hence, this phage appears to have a very efficient mechanism of counter defense against these specific endonucleases.

Phage K has its genes arranged in modules.

Temperate staphylococcal phages are generally organized in a modular form (20) which include modules for lysogeny, DNA replication, transcriptional regulation, packaging, structural proteins, and lysis. The organization of these temperate staphylococcal phage genomes is similar to that of temperate streptococcal phage genomes (6). Phage K also appears to have its genes arranged in modules, but the order differs from that for the temperate phages and the two sequenced lytic phages, which have their lysis module embedded in the structural region (43). The modules of phage K are not as well defined as those of the temperate staphylococcal and streptococcal phages; for example, there is a lack of intergenic regions between the structural and DNA replication and transcription modules. Putative rho-independent terminators were identified (Table 1) by using the TransTerm program (16). Three further terminators were located upstream of ORFs 1, 56, and 118 on the strand divergent to the ORFs. These terminators are characterized by a stem-loop in the mRNA followed by a U-rich sequence and allow for a punctuation of the 3′ ends of multicistronic mRNA.

Promoters and tRNAs are located in an intergenic region.

The 4.5-kb region between the divergently translated ORFs 33 and 34 does not carry ORFs according to the criteria employed in this study. However, two putative promoters are located in this region (Fig. 1).

Interestingly, three regions resembling tRNAs are located in the 4.5-kb intergenic region (from bp 30,600 to 30,370 [Fig. 1]). These were identified by using the tRNA scan SE program (24) and encode Asp-tRNA, Phe-tRNA, and a pseudo-tRNA gene. A fourth tRNA gene (bp 7,222 to 7151 [Fig. 1]), encoding Met-tRNA, was located in a noncoding region between ORFs 7 and 8. These tRNA genes are common in large phages such as coliphage T4 (28), vibriophage KVP40 (27), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage phi KZ (26), which are three sequenced lytic Myoviridae, each of which also has tRNA genes located intergenically.

Taxonomy and comparative genomics.

The need for a genome-based taxonomy tree has recently been identified (36). After studying 3,981 proteins of 105 genomes, no single gene that could be used as a basis for a classification system was found in all phages. Instead, a taxonomic system was based on a predicted phage proteome. The current phage proteome taxonomy is based on both complete phage genomes and prophages identified from within bacterial genomes (8). The database consists of 16,260 proteins from 375 genomes. Members of the ICTV family Myoviridae were grouped together in this system, with the exception of the T4 and P4 coliphages. These two phages represent their own groups in the proteomic tree due to the fact that they are the only sequenced representatives. Likewise, phage K does not fall within a defined group, confirming that it is the founding member of a new taxonomic group and that the Myoviridae are more diverse than their visual characterizations suggest.

Phage K falls closest to the PZA-like Podoviridae (Fig. 2). Figure 2 does not consider morphology or genome size but was generated by using a molecular characterization of the similarities between the phages. The weak similarities that currently bring phage K together with this group are mainly in the structural and replication modules; however, phage K is clearly in a taxonomic group of its own. The disparate locations of both phage T4 and phage K in Fig. 2 underscore the differences between the ICTV characterization of phages and the molecular characterization of phages. Indeed, we anticipate that as more phages are added to this tree, phage K will no longer fall on its own. Phage K and as-yet-unsequenced phages, such as those described by Jarvis et al. (21) and phage A511 (see below), could represent a new lineage of Myoviridae infecting gram-positive bacteria.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Section of the phage proteomic tree illustrating the relationship between phage K and other sequenced Myoviridae. The tree is based on 375 sequenced phage genomes and prophages. Only the section of the tree corresponding to phage K is shown for clarity. The tree joins the remainder of the phages at the dashed line. The PZA-like Podoviridae (Podophage) are highlighted for correlation to reference 36. Phage K is weakly related to both the PZA-like Podoviridae and the Borrelia burgdorferi plasmid prophage, which form unique taxonomic groups.

The lysis module is located in the first divergently transcribed 30 kb.

The lysis module (ORFs 30 to 33) is located at the end of the first 30 kb, where all ORFs are divergently transcribed in relation to the rest of the genome (Fig. 1). ORF 33 encodes a putative holin of 167 amino acids (18.1 kDa) whose stop codon overlaps by 1 bp in a different reading frame, ORF 32. Both ORFs 33 and 32 have recognizable ribosome binding sites (Table 1). The putative holin of phage K exhibited 61% identity with a holin from phage Twort (Table 1) and probably functions by generating pores in the bacterial cell membrane. The lysin (spliced products of ORFs 30 and 32 [see below]) contains the recently described CHAP domain, which is characterized by three conserved motifs (3, 35). The putative N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase domain is located in the center of the protein (residues 204 to 335), and a second amidase domain is located in the N terminus (residues 45 to 142).

Other putative ORFs within this 30-kb region include ORF 6, which encodes a 235-amino-acid (27.7-kDa) protein with an incomplete protein phosphate domain; ORF 15, which encodes a protein exhibiting 40% identity with an ATPase from the AAA family (39); and ORF 22, which encodes a 246-amino-acid (28.6-kDa) putative ATPase (Table 1).

Phage K may encode its own replisome and sigma factors.

As is evident from Table 1, the identity scores for ORFs of phage K are very low, which is typical of new phage genomes and makes bioinformatic interpretation difficult. Therefore, it is important to note that the identities of the ORFs discussed below are around 30%, with the exception of the subunits of the ribonucleotide reductase gene (ORFs 80 and 81 [Table 1]). Phage K has the potential to encode most of the proteins required for its own replisome, viz., DNA ligase (ORF 21), primase (ORF 76), helicase (ORF 69 and 71), polymerase (spliced products of ORFs 86, 88, and 90), RNase H (ORF 24), and DNA binding proteins (ORFs 17 and 85) (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Further ORFs include those encoding two exonucleases (ORFs 72 and 74), an integration host factor (ORF 85), enzymes required for nucleotide metabolism (ORFs 79, 80, and 81), and a thioredoxin protein (ORF 83), which could function in posttranslational modification or act as a chaperone (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Indeed, of the 52 ORFs assigned a putative function, approximately one-third are involved in DNA replication, metabolism, and repair. The majority of these proteins exhibit homology to bacterial but not phage proteins. Hence, phage K has an advantage in that it can potentially replicate its DNA without too much reliance on host functions. This may suggest that phage K has evolved to a broader host range. Along with T4 and the T4-related phage KVP40 (27, 28), phage K is one of the few examples of large phage genomes that encode so many DNA replication proteins.

When phage enter the host bacterial cell, they take control of many of the host proteins to use to their advantage, one of these being RNA polymerase. Phage K carries a putative sigma-like factor ORF (ORF 94), which encodes a protein of 220 amino acids (Table 1). When ORF 94 was scanned against the genome of phage K to determine if it shared homology with any of the unknown proteins, none was found. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis indicated that this protein is expressed at the same levels 10, 20, and 30 min after phage infection (data not shown). This sigma factor (ORF 94) could function to modify the host core RNA polymerase to recognize phage promoter regions, thereby regulating gene expression to express phage genes rather than host genes.

Introns with ORFs interrupting genes with crucial enzymatic functions.

Analysis of the genome revealed that both the putative polymerase and lysin genetic determinants contained intron-like sequences. Indeed, the polymerase gene contained two such putative structures (pol-I2 and pol-I3), each encoding endonucleases (ORF 87 [I-KsaII] and ORF 89 [I-KsaIII], respectively) (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the lysin gene contained one intron-like sequence (lys-I1), which also encodes a distinct endonuclease (ORF 31 [I-KsaI]) (Fig. 3B). Both I-KsaI and I-KsaIII exhibit homology to HNH endonucleases (Table 1) and contain an HNH motif. Interestingly I-KsaI also contains an intron-encoded nuclease repeat motif at the C-terminal end (data not shown). The functions of the nuclease repeats are unknown but could be involved in DNA binding via the helix-turn-helix motif (residues 116 to 164). I-KsaII exhibited no significant homology to any protein in the database. Closer examination of I-KsaII revealed the existence of two potential zinc binding motifs (CX2CX23CX2C and CX2C22CX2C), and thus it may belong to a subfamily of HNH endonucleases containing a zinc binding motif (11).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

(A) Schematic representation of the phage K polymerase gene interrupted by intron DNA. Dashed lines represent introns pol-I2 and pol-I3, encoding I-KsaII and I-KsaIII, respectively. The in vivo splicing of phage K intron DNA from the polymerase gene is illustrated on a 1% agarose gel. Lane 1, PCR product obtained on phage K DNA with primers PolF and PolR; lane 2, PCR product obtained from cDNA of phage K DNA with primers PolF and PolR; lane 3, 1-kb ladder (New England Biolabs). Sizes of PCR products are indicated on the right in base pairs. The schematic diagram is overlaid with a graph illustrating the percent G+C content in this section of the genome. (B) Schematic representation of the phage K lysin gene interrupted by intron DNA. Dashed lines represent intron lys-I1, encoding I-KsaI. The in vivo splicing of phage K intron DNA from the lysin gene is illustrated on a 1% agarose gel. Lane 1, PCR product obtained on phage K DNA with primers LysF and LysR; lane 2, PCR product obtained from cDNA of phage K with primers LysF and LysR; lane 3, 1-kb ladder (New England Biolabs). Sizes of PCR products are indicated on the right in base pairs. The schematic diagram is overlaid with a graph illustrating the percent G+C content in this section of the genome.

In order to confirm that these three distinct DNA regions represented introns, cDNA from each was sequenced. The results demonstrated that the polymerase gene had introns of 775 and 1,082 bp (pol-I2 and pol-I3, respectively) (Fig. 3A), whereas the lysin gene had an intron of 878 bp (lys-I1) (Fig. 3B). Sequence homology between the three introns (minus their corresponding endonuclease) indicates that they are unrelated. The alignment of phage K lysin with five similar sequences from the database revealed that intron lys-I1 interrupted the lysin gene in the putative N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase domain. The alignment of phage K translated polymerase likewise revealed that pol-I2 is inserted into the N-terminal part of the protein, more specifically near an incomplete putative 3′-5′ exonuclease activity domain, whereas pol-I3 is inserted in the center of the putative polymerase A domain (alignments not shown). The interruption of the polymerase and lysin genes in putative conserved regions, together with the differences in G+C content of the three introns and the endonucleases encoded within them (Fig. 3), suggests that they evolved independently but are convergently targeting essential functions.

Overview of relationship to other phages: phage K and Listeria phage A511 have similar structural modules.

When structural proteins of phage K were examined by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4), four that correspond to predicted proteins of phage K (ORFs 44, 49, 50, and 95) were identified on the basis of N-terminal sequencing. N-terminal sequencing identified the putative major tail sheath protein encoded by ORF 49 of phage K, which is 54.5 kDa (Fig. 4). The amino acid sequence matched the first 7 N-terminal amino acids of the ORF 49 product except for the initial methionine. Ben-Bassat et al. (4) previously reported that the N-terminal methionine residue is often processed when the second residue is an alanine, as is the case for ORF 49 and also ORFs 50 and 95 (Fig. 4). Database searches revealed a 57% identity with the tail sheath protein of Listeria phage A511 (23) (Fig. 4), which is a member of the Myoviridae family and has a contractile tail, linear double-stranded DNA, and a large genome of 116 kb. Only its structural module and amidase have been sequenced to date, and it cannot, therefore, be included on the proteome tree. N-terminal sequencing of band B resulted in 15 amino acids which are identical to residues 25 to 39 of the deduced protein product of ORF 44, indicating posttranslational cleavage of the first 23 amino acids. The product of this ORF shares 82% identity with the capsid protein of phage Twort (Table 1). The product of ORF 44 shares 66% identity with the capsid protein of phage A511, which also exhibits posttranslational cleavage of the first 23 amino acids (23) (Fig. 4). Interestingly band C corresponds to a protein of unknown function (ORF 95) (Fig. 4). N-terminal sequencing revealed the first 17 amino acids of this protein, which has a predicted molecular mass of 23.2 kDa (Fig. 4). The amino acid sequence obtained from band D (Fig. 4) corresponds to the product of ORF 50, with a predicted molecular mass of 15.9 kDa. ORF 50 shares an identity of 68% with ORF 8 from Listeria phage A511, which has an unknown function (23).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

One-dimensional SDS-PAGE of phage K proteins stained with Coomassie brilliant blue and schematic diagram of similarities with Listeria phage A511. Bands A, B, C, and D represent the four proteins that were N-terminally sequenced. The N-terminal sequences of each band and the ORF from the genome of phage K to which each band corresponds are shown to the right. Numbering of ORFs for phage A511 corresponds to that in reference 23. Dark grey arrows represent ORFs with a corresponding ORF in each phage, and light grey arrows represent ORFs that have no corresponding ORFs between phages K and A511. Percent identities shared between ORFs of phages K and A511 are indicated in boxes in the schematic diagram.

The proteins within the structural module are not homologous to the equivalent proteins of the sequenced lytic and temperate staphylococcal phages, but they do exhibit homology to Listeria phage A511, with the exception of ORF 41. The product of ORF 41 exhibited a low (22%) identity with a portal protein form E. coli phage P27 (Table 1). The portal protein is usually found transcribed near the large and small terminase subunits (for example, in phage bIl170 [8, 11]). ORF 35 is the putative large terminase subunit, although the homology is very weak and was apparent only with PSI-BLAST. No small terminase subunit was identified based on homology searches, but it is presumed to be encoded by one of the adjacent ORFs. Interestingly, this 11,361-bp (minus the portal protein) structural region of phage K shows significant homology with phage A511, not just at gene level but also in the arrangement of ORFs (23) (Fig. 4). Database searches with ORFs 42 to 53 revealed that all homologies were with the structural proteins of A511; with the exception of ORF44, no homologies were obtained with any other structural proteins of any other phage, including sequenced staphylococcal phages (Table 1). As Fig. 4 illustrates, all structural ORFs of A511, with the exception of ORF 2, have a homologous ORF in phage K. Phage K has three additional ORFs in the structural modules (ORF 43, 51, and 52), which have an unknown function and no corresponding ORF within phage A511 (Fig. 4). Most likely, ORF 43 has a complement in A511 (ORF2), where a gene replacement seems to have occurred, whereas in phage A511 a deletion event may have occurred, with the loss of ORFs corresponding to ORFs 51 and 52 from phage K. The dramatic similarity between these large (11-kb) regions of both phages suggests that phage K and A511 are related and could constitute a new lineage of Myoviridae infecting low-G+C-content gram-positive bacteria. The elucidation of the genomes of A511 and other large Myoviridae (21) may facilitate the classification of these large Myoviridae to the same lineage.

Conclusions.

Phage K is a large, virulent bacteriophage which infects a broad range of staphylococci, including multiple-drug-resistant strains of S. aureus. Detailed genetic characterization of this phage has unveiled a number of features as follows. (i) Phage K has been taxonomically placed in its own group because of overall uniqueness compared to other phage. (ii) The genome also contains introns in essential phage functions, two in the polymerase gene and one in the lysin gene. (iii) Phage K contains a large region with remarkable homology to Listeria phage A511. (iv) Finally, phage K has a remarkable paucity of GATC and GGNCC, sites suggesting that phage K has evolved an efficient counter defense against host restriction-modification systems.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Irish Government under the FIRM program as part of the National Development Plan 2000-2006, by European Union structural funds, and by the Science Foundation Ireland. Sarah O'Flaherty is in receipt of a Teagasc Walsh Fellowship.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-3402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bateman, A., and N. D. Rawlings. 2003. The CHAP domain: a large family of amidases including GSP amidase and peptidoglycan hydrolases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:234-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ben-Bassat, A., K. Bauer, S. Y. Chang, K. Myambo, A. Boosman, and S. Chang. 1987. Processing of the initiation methionine from proteins: properties of the Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase and its gene structure. J. Bacteriol. 169:751-757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Botstein, D. 1980. A theory of modular evolution for bacteriophages. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 354:484-490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brussow, H., and F. Desiere. 2001. Comparative phage genomics and the evolution of Siphoviridae: insights from dairy phages. Mol. Microbiol. 39:213-222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burnet, F. M., and D. Lush. 1935. The staphylococcal bacteriophages. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 40:455-469. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Casjens, S. 2003. Prophages and bacterial genomics: what have we learned so far? Mol. Microbiol. 49:277-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casjens, S., G. Hatfull, and R. Hendrix. 1992. Evolution of dsDNA tailed-bacteriophage genomes. Semin. Virol. 3:383-397. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chatterjee, A. N. 1969. Use of bacteriophage-resistant mutants to study the nature of the bacteriophage receptor site of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 98:519-527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crutz-Le Coq, A. M., B. Cesselin, J. Commissaire, and J. Anba. 2002. Sequence analysis of the lactococcal bacteriophage bIL170: insights into structural proteins and HNH endonucleases in dairy phages. Microbiology 148:985-1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Desiere, F., S. Lucchini, C. Canchaya, M. Ventura, and H. Brussow. 2002. Comparative genomics of phages and prophages in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 82:73-91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Desiere, F., C. Mahanivong, A. J. Hillier, P. S. Chandry, B. E. Davidson, and H. Brussow. 2001. Comparative genomics of lactococcal phages: insight from the complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis phage BK5-T. Virology 283:240-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desiere, F., W. M. McShan, D. van Sinderen, J. J. Ferretti, and H. Brussow. 2001. Comparative genomics reveals close genetic relationships between phages from dairy bacteria and pathogenic Streptococci: evolutionary implications for prophage-host interactions. Virology 288:325-341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Edgell, D. R., M. Belfort, and D. A. Shub. 2000. Barriers to intron promiscuity in bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 182:5281-5289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ermolaeva, M. D., H. G. Khalak, O. White, H. O. Smith, and S. L. Salzberg. 2000. Prediction of transcription terminators in bacterial genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 301:27-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hotchin, J. E. 1951. The influence of acridines on the interaction of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus K phage. J. Gen. Microbiol. 5:609-618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hotchin, J. E. 1954. The purification and electron microscopical examination of the structure of staphylococcal bacteriophage K. J. Gen. Microbiol. 10:250-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hotchin, J. E., I. M. Dawson, and W. J. Elford. 1952. The use of empty bacterial membranes in the study of the adsorption of Staphylococcus K phage upon its host. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 33:177-182. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Iandolo, J. J., V. Worrell, K. H. Groicher, Y. Qian, R. Tian, S. Kenton, A. Dorman, H. Ji, S. Lin, P. Loh, S. Qi, H. Zhu, and B. A. Roe. 2002. Comparative analysis of the genomes of the temperate bacteriophages phi 11, phi 12 and phi 13 of Staphylococcus aureus 8325. Gene 289:109-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jarvis, A. W., L. J. Collins, and H. W. Ackermann. 1993. A study of five bacteriophages of the Myoviridae family which replicate on different gram-positive bacteria. Arch. Virol. 133:75-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuroda, M., T. Ohta, I. Uchiyama, T. Baba, H. Yuzawa, I. Kobayashi, L. Cui, A. Oguchi, K. Aoki, Y. Nagai, J. Lian, T. Ito, M. Kanamori, H. Matsumaru, A. Maruyama, H. Murakami, A. Hosoyama, Y. Mizutani-Ui, N. K. Takahashi, T. Sawano, R. Inoue, C. Kaito, K. Sekimizu, H. Hirakawa, S. Kuhara, S. Goto, J. Yabuzaki, M. Kanehisa, A. Yamashita, K. Oshima, K. Furuya, C. Yoshino, T. Shiba, M. Hattori, N. Ogasawara, H. Hayashi, and K. Hiramatsu. 2001. Whole genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1225-1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Loessner, M. J., and S. Scherer. 1995. Organization and transcriptional analysis of the Listeria phage A511 late gene region comprising the major capsid and tail sheath protein genes cps and tsh. J. Bacteriol. 177:6601-6609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lowe, T. M., and S. R. Eddy. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955-964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lucchini, S., F. Desiere, and H. Brussow. 1999. Comparative genomics of Streptococcus thermophilus phage species supports a modular evolution theory. J. Virol. 73:8647-8656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mesyanzhinov, V. V., J. Robben, B. Grymonprez, V. A. Kostyuchenko, M. V. Bourkaltseva, N. N. Sykilinda, V. N. Krylov, and G. Volckaert. 2002. The genome of bacteriophage phiKZ of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Mol. Biol. 317:1-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller, E. S., J. F. Heidelberg, J. A. Eisen, W. C. Nelson, A. S. Durkin, A. Ciecko, T. V. Feldblyum, O. White, I. T. Paulsen, W. C. Nierman, J. Lee, B. Szczypinski, and C. M. Fraser. 2003. Complete genome sequence of the broad-host-range vibriophage KVP40: comparative genomics of a T4-related bacteriophage. J. Bacteriol. 185:5220-5233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller, E. S., E. Kutter, G. Mosig, F. Arisaka, T. Kunisawa, and W. Ruger. 2003. Bacteriophage T4 genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67:86-156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Moineau, S., S. Pandian, and T. R. Klaenhammer. 1993. Restriction-modification systems and restriction endonucleases are more effective on lactococcal bacteriophages that have emerged recently in the dairy industry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:197-202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O'Sullivan, D., D. P. Twomey, A. Coffey, C. Hill, G. F. Fitzgerald, and R. P. Ross. 2000. Novel type I restriction specificities through domain shuffling of HsdS subunits in Lactococcus lactis. Mol. Microbiol. 36:866-875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pantucek, R., A. Rosypalova, J. Doskar, J. Kailerova, V. Ruzickova, P. Borecka, S. Snopkova, R. Horvath, F. Gotz, and S. Rosypal. 1998. The polyvalent staphylococcal phage phi 812: its host-range mutants and related phages. Virology 246:241-252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rees, P. J., and B. A. Fry. 1981. The morphology of staphylococcal bacteriophage K and DNA metabolism in infected Staphylococcus aureus. J. Gen. Virol. 53:293-307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rees, P. J., and B. A. Fry. 1981. The replication of bacteriophage K DNA in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Gen. Virol. 55:41-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rees, P. J., and B. A. Fry. 1983. Structure and properties of the rapidly sedimenting replicating complex of staphylococcal phage K DNA. J. Gen. Virol. 64:191-198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rigden, D. J., M. J. Jedrzejas, and M. Y. Galperin. 2003. Amidase domains from bacterial and phage autolysins define a family of gamma-d,l-glutamate-specific amidohydrolases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:230-234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rohwer, F., and R. Edwards. 2002. The phage proteomic tree: a genome-based taxonomy for phage. J. Bacteriol. 184:4529-4535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rountree, P. M. 1949. The serological differentiation of Staphylococcal bacteriophages. J. Gen Microbiol. 3:164-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  • 39.Sasaki, Y., J. Ishikawa, A. Yamashita, K. Oshima, T. Kenri, K. Furuya, C. Yoshino, A. Horino, T. Shiba, T. Sasaki, and M. Hattori. 2002. The complete genomic sequence of Mycoplasma penetrans, an intracellular bacterial pathogen in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:5293-5300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sussenbach, J. S., C. H. Monfoort, R. Schiphof, and E. E. Stobberingh. 1976. A restriction endonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 3:3193-3202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sussenbach, J. S., P. H. Steenbergh, J. A. Rost, W. J. van Leeuwen, and J. D. van Embden. 1978. A second site-specific restriction endonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 5:1153-1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.van Regenmortel, M. H. V., C. M. Fauquet, D. H. L. Bishop, E. B. Carstens, M. K. Estes, S. M. Lemon, J. Maniloff, M. A. Mayo, D. J. McGeoch, C. R. Pringle, and R. B. Wickner. 2000. Virus taxonomy: the classification and nomenclature of viruses. Seventh report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
  • 43.Vybiral, D., M. Takac, M. Loessner, A. Witte, U. von Ahsen, and U. Blasi. 2003. Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular characterization of two lytic Staphylococcus aureus phages: 44AHJD and P68. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 219:275-283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES