Skip to main content
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN logoLink to Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
. 2013 Dec 5;9(1):150–158. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02300213

Generalization of Associations of Kidney-Related Genetic Loci to American Indians

Nora Franceschini *,, Karin Haack , Laura Almasy , Sandra Laston , Elisa T Lee , Lyle G Best §, Richard R Fabsitz , Jean W MacCluer , Barbara V Howard , Jason G Umans ¶,**, Shelley A Cole
PMCID: PMC3878690  PMID: 24311711

Summary

Background and objectives

CKD disproportionally affects American Indians, who similar to other populations, show genetic susceptibility to kidney outcomes. Recent studies have identified several loci associated with kidney traits, but their relevance in American Indians is unknown.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This study used data from a large, family-based genetic study of American Indians (the Strong Heart Family Study), which includes 94 multigenerational families enrolled from communities located in Oklahoma, the Dakotas, and Arizona. Individuals were recruited from the Strong Heart Study, a population-based study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians. This study selected 25 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 23 loci identified from recently published kidney-related genome-wide association studies in individuals of European ancestry to evaluate their associations with kidney function (estimated GFR; individuals 18 years or older, up to 3282 individuals) and albuminuria (urinary albumin to creatinine ratio; n=3552) in the Strong Heart Family Study. This study also examined the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the APOL1 region with estimated GFR in 1121 Strong Heart Family Study participants. GFR was estimated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Equation. Additive genetic models adjusted for age and sex were used.

Results

This study identified significant associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms with estimated GFR in or nearby PRKAG2, SLC6A13, UBE2Q2, PIP5K1B, and WDR72 (P<2.1 × 10-3 to account for multiple testing). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in these loci explained 2.2% of the estimated GFR total variance and 2.9% of its heritability. An intronic variant of BCAS3 was significantly associated with urinary albumin to creatinine ratio. APOL1 single nucleotide polymorphisms were not associated with estimated GFR in a single variant test or haplotype analyses, and the at-risk variants identified in individuals with African ancestry were not detected in DNA sequencing of American Indians.

Conclusion

This study extends the genetic associations of loci affecting kidney function to American Indians, a population at high risk of kidney disease, and provides additional support for a potential biologic relevance of these loci across ancestries.

Introduction

Familial aggregation of CKD (1,2) suggests a strong genetic susceptibility to CKD. Decreased estimated GFR (eGFR) and albuminuria (as assessed by urinary albumin to creatinine ratio [UACR]) are associated with increased risk of kidney disease and show high heritability, defined by the proportion of the phenotypic variance caused by genetic effects (36%–75% for eGFR and 16%–46% for UACR) (39). Recent genome-wide association (GWA) studies have highlighted the contribution of common variants (minor allele frequency≥0.05) to kidney traits. These studies have described several genomic regions (and genes) associated with CKD, eGFR, and UACR in the general population (1015), and some of these loci are generalizable across ancestries. Additional loci, such as the region encoding MYH9 and APOL1 on chromosome 22, have been associated with nondiabetic kidney disease, FSGS, HIV-associated nephropathy, and hypertensive-attributed nephropathy (1618). Two alleles of APOL1 confer risk to individuals of African ancestry (16), but it is unknown if this gene is associated with kidney traits in American Indians.

CKD disproportionally affects racial and ethnic minorities in the United States, especially American Indians, who also experience greater disparities in cardiometabolic disorders, including diabetes and obesity. Earlier stages of CKD are highly prevalent in American Indians, even among nondiabetic individuals. In the Strong Heart Study (SHS), which is a cohort of American Indians ages 45–74 years, 18% of the nondiabetic participants had CKD at baseline. Both the SHS and the Zuni Kidney Project, a population-based cross-sectional survey of the Pueblo of Zuni, have shown microalbuminuria, a marker of kidney damage, at a rate of 10%–20%, but only one half of the individuals with albuminuria have diabetes (19,20). The Kidney Early Evaluation Program, a national kidney disease screening program, reported that 29% of self-identified American Indians and Alaskan Natives had either reduced kidney function or microalbuminuria (21). We have previously shown that MYH9 variants and haplotypes are not associated with kidney function or UACR in American Indian participants of the Strong Heart Family Study (SHFS) (22). The effects of APOL1 and other GWA-identified loci on kidney traits have not been previously reported in American Indians.

To investigate the role of known genetic variants in accounting for interindividual variation of kidney traits in a population with a high prevalence of CKD, we genotyped several GWA-identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in American Indians of the SHFS. Additionally, because of the results from studies of African Americans, we hypothesized that APOL1 variants are associated with kidney traits in American Indians. We examined the association of 15 APOL1 SNPs available for 1121 SHFS individuals. Here, we report findings for the generalization of the association of these loci with kidney traits in American Indians.

Materials and Methods

Study Population: The SHFS

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded SHFS is a large, family-based genetic study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians enrolled from 13 tribal communities located in Oklahoma, the Dakotas, and Arizona. Individuals were recruited from the parent study, the SHS, a population-based cohort study of American Indians 45 years or older. Briefly, the SHFS began as a pilot study in 1998, when ∼900 members of extended families of the SHS parent study were examined. Additional family members were recruited in 2001–2003 for a total sample of 3798 individuals in 94 multigenerational families (mean family size of 40 individuals, range=5–110 people). Extensive and detailed lifestyle, clinical, and laboratory measures and cardiovascular outcomes are available in the SHFS. The SHFS protocols were approved by the Indian Health Service Institutional Review Board, Institutional Review Boards of all institutions, and the participating Indian tribes (23,24). All participants gave informed consent for genetic testing. This study includes SHFS American Indians seen during exam phase 4. We excluded individuals with missing serum creatinine or urine albumin/creatinine and individuals with unknown dialysis/transplant status. Individuals younger than 18 years of age were also excluded for eGFR analysis. The final sample for eGFR was 3282 and 3218 individuals for eGFR analyses with and without including individuals with ESRD, respectively (before genotyping exclusions).

Clinical and Outcome Measures

Standardized anthropometric, clinical, and 12-hour fasting laboratory measures (serum and urine) were collected at each visit (including serum creatinine) as well as spot urine samples for albumin and creatinine measurement. Demographic data (age, sex, and education), lifestyle and behaviors (smoking and alcohol intake), medical history, and medications were obtained through questionnaires (24,25). BP was measured in resting individuals, and the last two of three measures were averaged. Body weight (kilograms) and height (meters) were used to estimate body mass index (kilograms per meter2). DNA samples were obtained. All laboratory tests were performed in a centralized laboratory. Serum and urine creatinine were assayed by a kinetic alkaline picrate method, and urine albumin was assayed by a sensitive nephelometric method; both were performed on the Hitachi 717 Platform (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Type 2 diabetes is defined as a fasting glucose≥126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/L), history of diabetes, or use of diabetic medications (26). Hypertension is defined as BP>140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medications (27).

Urine albumin excretion was estimated as UACR (milligrams per gram), and eGFR was calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Equation (28).

SNP Selection, Genotyping, and Quality Control

SNPs were selected from GWA publications before January of 2011 for studies reporting findings for eGFR, serum creatinine, CKD, and UACR traits. Loci were retrieved from the National Human Genome Research Institute Genome Catalog (www.genome.gov/gwastudies/) for SNPs showing a genome-wide association of P<5.0 × 10-8. SHROOM3 variants were not available for analysis. Several SNPs in the APOL1 region were also available in a subset of SHFS participants, some of whom were related (16 tag SNPs; n=1121, with 753 half-sibling relative pairs [kinship coefficient=0.25] and 2891 first cousin relationships or less [kinship coefficient≤0.125]). These SNPs were genotyped for a previous study of genetic variation affecting cardiovascular disease in this chromosomal region, and they were selected from HapMap CEU and CHB/JPT. SNPs were typed using the multiplex VeraCode technology from Illumina according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Cluster calls were checked for accuracy, and genotypes were exported as text files for additional use in association analysis. Replica samples were included as controls for genotyping and allele calling consistencies.

Quality control included requiring sample call rates of >95%, concordance of blinded replicates, and removal of those individuals that deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium among the subsample of 1121 individuals (P<0.001). Individuals with more than 10% of missing genotypes were excluded. For SNPs in the same loci, we estimated pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) and report only independent signals using r2<0.9. LD was plotted using Haploview version 4.2 (29).

Statistical Analyses

Markedly skewed quantitative traits were log-transformed to achieve normality. We first obtained center-specific residuals of eGFR and log UACR using linear regression models adjusted for age, age2, sex, and age-by-sex interactions. For eGFR analyses, we tested two models: (1) one model excluding individuals on renal replacement therapy (dialysis) and individuals with a kidney transplant (model 1, n=66 excluded) and (2) one model imputing an eGFR value of 10 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for individuals on dialysis and individuals with a kidney transplant (model 2). Trait residuals were regressed into genotypes of each SNP, which were coded as the number of copies of the minor allele that each individual carries (additive genetic model). For single test association analyses, we used the measured genotype approach, which is a mixed model that accounts for family relatedness as random effects and covariates as fixed effects (30). Center-specific summary results were combined using fixed effects meta-analyses (31). To assess the evidence for between-center heterogeneity, we also estimated the between-center variance (tested at P<0.05) and the I2 metric (percent of the total variation between studies because of heterogeneity rather than change; >50% indicates large heterogeneity) (32). The total variance of eGFR and the percent heritability explained by genetic variants significantly associated with the trait were obtained using maximum likelihood variance decomposition methods (33) by comparing adjusted models with and without the SNPs.

Family data are robust to population stratification, and relatedness is adjusted using an already estimated kinship matrix. However, we also assessed the evidence for population stratification using methods described in the work by Havill et al. (34), which decomposes genotype scores into between-pairs (b) and within-pairs (w) components. Population stratification should affect only the parameter-βb. Stratification is inferred when estimates of βb and βw differ significantly. SNPs showing significant evidence for population stratification (P<0.05) were considered false positives.

APOL1 risk alleles from African ancestry were not available, and therefore, we also performed haplotype analyses to better capture potentially associated alleles in the region. Haplotypes were inferred using Phase (version 2.1), which implements a Bayesian statistical method for reconstructing haplotypes from population genotype data (35). We then evaluated the association of haplotype copies with kidney function (eGFR) using linear regression models.

We used the approach of Cheverud (36) and Nyholt (37) to estimate the effective number of tests to correct based on the intra-SNP correlations: α=2.1×10−3 for 24 independent tests for GWA SNP associations (rs7805747 and rs10224210 were highly correlated) (Supplemental Table 1) and α=7.1×10−3 for APOL1 SNPs (seven independent SNPs) (Figure 1, LD).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Pairwise linkage disequilibrium at the APOL1 locus in American Indians by geographic region. (A) Arizona, (B) Oklahoma, and (C) the Dakotas. Graphs were generated from the American Indian data using Haploview 4.2. Colors represent D′ values: blue, statistically ambiguous D′; dark red, high inter-single nucleotide polymorphism (inter-SNP) D′; white, low inter-SNP D′. Linkage disequilibrium blocks are also shown.

Results

Characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. Exclusions are described in Materials and Methods. Hypertension and diabetes were more common in American Indians recruited from Arizona followed by Oklahoma and the Dakotas. Individuals from Arizona also had higher mean eGFR and median UACR than individuals from Oklahoma and the Dakotas. Of 25 investigated SNPs in 23 loci, 7 SNPs (6 loci) were significantly associated with eGFR in meta-analysis of the three centers (P<2.1 × 10-3 to account for multiple testing) (Table 2, model 1). These SNPs were in or nearby PRKAG2 (two SNPs), SLC6A13, UBE2Q2, SYPL2/PSMA5, PIP5K1B, and WDR72. Study-specific allele frequencies are shown in Supplemental Table 2. Only rs1933182 (SYPL2/PSMA5) showed significant evidence for population stratification (P<0.001) and was considered a false positive. The remaining five SNPs explained 2.2% of the total variance and 2.9% of the eGFR heritability (we included only the SNP with lowest P at PRKAG2). In analysis including dialysis and transplant individuals and imputed values for eGFR, only rs10774021 and rs10224210 associations remained significant (Table 2, model 2). An intronic SNP of BCAS3 was significantly associated with UACR in meta-analysis (Table 2). Additional SNPs showing nominal associations in center-specific or meta-analysis for eGFR and UACR are shown in Supplemental Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of American Indians at baseline: Strong Heart Family Study 2001–2003

Characteristics Overall (n=3599) Arizona (n=1199) Dakotas (n=1204) Oklahoma (n=1196)
Mean age (SD), yr 39.6 (16.9) 36.5 (15.7) 38.8 (17.1) 43.5 (17.2)
Women, % 60.0 62.1 58.7 59.2
Mean eGFR (SD)a 98.5 (25.7) 111.6 (28.4) 92.8 (21.2) 91.6 (21.8)
Median UACR (interval) 7.8 (4.7–18.4) 10.3 (5.5–27.6) 7.1 (4.5–15.0) 7.1 (4.4–15.0)
Hypertension, % 30.6 32.4 22.8 36.7
Type 2 diabetes, % 21.6 31.4 13.5 20.1

eGFR, estimated GFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2; UACR, urine albumin to creatinine ratio.

a

Individuals ages 18 years or older.

Table 2.

Significant results for association of estimated GFR and log-urine albumin to creatinine ratio with candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms

SNP Chromosome Region Gene (Function) Effect Allele Frequency Effect/Other Allele Model 1 Model 2: P Value ESRDa
β (SE) P Value Total Number P Heterogeneity
eGFR
 rs10774021 12p13.33 SLC6A13 (intron) 0.05–0.27 A/G −0.16 (0.04) 8.8×10-6 3160 0.27 5.8×10-4
 rs1394125 15q24.2 UBE2Q2 (intron) 0.05–0.16 A/G −0.17 (0.04) 4.6×10-5 3164 0.02 2.3×10-3
 rs10224210b 7q36.1 PRKAG2 (intron) 0.02–0.15 G/A −0.19 (0.05) 2.2×10-4 3162 0.94 1.4×10-3
 rs491567 15q21.3 WDR72 (intron) 0.37–0.45 A/C −0.09 (0.03) 4.5×10-4 3159 0.93 4.8×10-3
 rs1933182c 1p13.3 SYPL2/PSMA5 0.02–0.14 A/C −0.16 (0.05) 5.4×10-4 3165 0.60 6.3×10-3
 rs7805747b 7q36.1 PRKAG2 (intron) 0.02–0.15 A/G −0.17 (0.05) 7.0×10-4 3164 0.86 3.3×10-3
 rs4744712 9q21.11 PIP5K1B (intron) 0.04–0.28 A/C −0.13 (0.04) 1.5×10-3 3160 0.84 6.1×10-3
LUACR
 rs9895661 17q23.2 BCAS3 (intron) 0.16–0.54 A/G −0.11 (0.03) 5.8×10-5 3552 0.88

SNPs are listed by the order of P values (lowest to highest). Effect estimates (β) are the change in eGFR or LUACR residuals per each copy of the effect allele from meta-analyses of three centers. eGFR and LUACR residuals were obtained from linear regression models adjusted for age, age2, sex, and age-by-sex interactions (Materials and Methods). A P<2.1 × 10-3 was considered significant to account for multiple testing. SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; eGFR, estimated GFR; LUACR, log urine albumin to creatinine ratio.

a

Up to 3282 individuals.

b

Note two significant SNPs at the PRKAG2 locus. These SNPs are 5.3 kb apart and in linkage disequilibrium in HapMap CEU (r2=0.96, D′=1.0). The published SNP is rs7805747.

c

This SNP showed significant evidence for population stratification.

Of 15 SNPs available in the APOL1 region, 5 SNPs were located in an exon, and 3 SNPs were missense variants. Allele frequencies by center are shown in Table 3, and the LD in the region for each center is shown in Figure 1. In single SNP analysis, none of the variants were significantly associated with eGFR. Using seven highly correlated SNPs (rs136159, rs713929, rs2239785, rs136174, rs136175, rs136176, and rs136177), we identified two common haplotypes (GGAAAAA: frequency=0.93; AAGCGGG: frequency=0.06). We then used the most likely pairs of haplotypes for each individual (posterior probability>0.90) to investigate their association with eGFR, but results were not significant (P>0.05).

Table 3.

Association of APOL1 SNPs on chromosome 22 with estimated GFR in American Indians

SNP Position (Build 36) Variant type Effect Allele Other Allele Arizona The Dakotas Oklahoma
Freq β (SE) P n Freq β (SE) P n Freq β (SE) P n
rs4821472 34977906 Flanking 5′UTR G A 0.05 −0.02 (0.20) 0.93 355 0.05 −0.01 (0.19) 0.95 321 0.06 0.01 (0.15) 0.92 371
rs9610467 34979520 Intron A G 0.13 0.14 (0.11) 0.22 356 0.17 −0.07 (0.10) 0.49 321 0.09 −0.08 (0.12) 0.53 373
rs7284919 34982110 Intron G A 0.11 0.18 (0.12) 0.13 356 0.16 −0.04 (0.11) 0.67 321 0.09 −0.03 (0.12) 0.80 373
rs136148 34982877 Intron G A 0.07 −0.14 (0.16) 0.39 356 0.11 −0.05 (0.12) 0.68 321 0.15 −0.07 (0.10) 0.52 373
rs4820224 34983221 Intron A G 0.05 −0.05 (0.19) 0.77 356 0.05 −0.03 (0.19) 0.88 321 0.07 −0.15 (0.14) 0.28 373
rs136159a 34986969 Intron A G 0.03 −0.28 (0.21) 0.18 355 0.06 −0.08 (0.16) 0.62 321 0.08 0.05 (0.14) 0.71 373
rs713929a 34987542 Intron A G 0.03 −0.28 (0.21) 0.17 356 0.06 −0.08 (0.16) 0.62 321 0.08 0.10 (0.14) 0.48 373
rs2239785a 34991276 missense G A 0.04 −0.35 (0.19) 0.07 356 0.07 −0.10 (0.15) 0.52 321 0.09 0.11 (0.14) 0.42 373
rs136174a 34991482 synonymous C A 0.03 −0.28 (0.21) 0.18 353 0.06 −0.08 (0.15) 0.60 321 0.08 0.09 (0.14) 0.50 373
rs136175a 34991512 missense G A 0.03 −0.28 (0.21) 0.18 355 0.06 −0.08 (0.15) 0.60 321 0.08 0.09 (0.14) 0.50 373
rs136176a 34991592 missense G A 0.03 −0.28 (0.21) 0.17 356 0.06 −0.08 (0.15) 0.60 321 0.08 0.09 (0.14) 0.50 373
rs136177a 34991788 synonymous G A 0.03 −0.29 (0.20) 0.16 355 0.06 −0.08 (0.15) 0.60 321 0.08 0.09 (0.14) 0.50 373
rs3886200 34993573 Flanking 3′UTR G A 0.12 0.17 (0.12) 0.14 355 0.28 0.03 (0.09) 0.75 321 0.18 −0.03 (0.09) 0.73 373
rs2012928 34993948 Flanking 3′UTR A G 0.10 0.28 (0.13) 0.03 356 0.18 0.09 (0.10) 0.36 321 0.11 −0.03 (0.12) 0.81 373
rs136183 34996271 Flanking 3′UTR A G 0.12 0.20 (0.12) 0.09 353 0.28 0.03 (0.09) 0.72 320 0.17 −0.03 (0.09) 0.76 373

Effect estimates (β) are the change in estimated GFR residuals per each copy of the effect allele (Materials and Methods). SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; Freq, effect allele frequency (minor allele); n, number; UTR, untranslated region.

a

SNPs used for haplotype inference.

Discussion

In this study, we provide evidence for generalization to American Indians of seven GWA SNPs in loci related to kidney traits. Six SNPs showed significant association with eGFR, and one SNP showed significant association with UACR. Although significant, the association at the SYPL2/PSMA5 locus is likely attributable to population stratification. Several SNPs in other loci showed either significant or nominal associations with these traits in individuals within a geographic region. All alleles associated with eGFR were the same alleles identified in the meta-analysis of individuals of European ancestry, and an additional SNP in the PRKAG2 gene was in LD with the published SNP in HapMap CEU samples. Although there were regional allelic frequency differences for SNPs, most of the associations showed no evidence for heterogeneity across regions. Comparison of the effect estimates for these SNPs with those SNPs from European populations showed the same direction of the at-risk allele estimates, supporting the relevance of these loci to American Indians (the magnitude of the effect cannot be compared, because we used eGFR residuals in our analysis).

The SNPs examined in this study were identified in analysis of eGFR in population studies, which usually have a small number of individuals with CKD. The SNP at UBE2Q2 and the SNP at PRKAG2 have been previously associated with a prospective reduction of eGFR (<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) in individuals of European ancestry but not with ESRD (38). Of interest, the inclusion of individuals with ESRD (n=66) in our analysis attenuated the SNP associations with eGFR, and only the associations of the SNP at SLC6A13 and a SNP at PRKAG2 remained significant. This finding suggests a role of these loci on normal variation of kidney function rather than disease, although our results could be driven by the methods used for imputation of eGFR missing data in individuals with ESRD.

Among the loci associated with eGFR, SNPs in the SLC6A13 locus have been recently associated with eGFR in African Americans (12), and WDR72 was associated with eGFR in East Asians (39), suggesting that genetic variation at these loci may have relevance for kidney function across multiple ethnic groups/ancestries. The PRKAG2 locus was also associated with hematocrit values (40) and CKD in individuals of European ancestry (10). BCAS3, associated with UACR in our data, was associated with eGFR, serum creatinine, and BUN in studies of individuals of European ancestry (10) and East Asians (39). Of interest is the high proportion of the interindividual variation in eGFR explained by the SNPs in the five associated loci (2.2%), which corresponds to 2.9% of heritability of eGFR in our pedigrees. This finding is in contrast to the discovery population studies, in which 16 validated SNPs explain only approximately 1.4% of the variation of eGFR (10). In addition, we were able to detect associations at these loci using a much smaller sample than the European discovery study (∼67,000 European ancestry individuals versus ∼3000 American Indians). Therefore, our study exemplifies the advantages of using diverse ancestry individuals and/or family data to identify associations with complex diseases.

For the APOL1 locus, we did not identify any associations for either single SNPs or haplotypes with kidney function. The known risk alleles at this locus have been restricted to individuals of African ancestry (16), because they seem to have arisen through positive selection in Africa. APOL1 is a trypanolytic factor in human serum, and the variants associated with kidney disease also confer resistance to Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, which is transmitted by the tsetse fly and causes sleeping sickness (41,42). In American Indians, we did not detect the African-derived risk alleles in DNA sequence of APOL1 coding regions (available from whole-exome sequencing data) in 94 SHFS individuals (data not shown), providing additional evidence that these risk variants are only present in Africans. However, we did detect strong LD among the SNPs that we genotyped, suggesting that there may be other selective pressures on this gene region in American Indians. Although negative, our findings do not rule out the possibility that additional variants in the APOL1 gene may influence kidney traits in American Indians.

Our study was limited to GWA published SNPs, and therefore, we cannot exclude the presence in American Indians of one or more potentially functional variants (common or rare) in loci not showing significant associations. In addition, APOL1 SNPs were available only in a subset of SHFS individuals with available genotyping. However, this study is the first study to show generalization of kidney-related loci to American Indians, a population at high risk of CKD. Our findings show the feasibility of genetic studies in this population, even if samples are limited, and provide additional support for a potential biologic relevance of these loci across different ancestries. Future studies on the association of these loci with longitudinal kidney outcomes will require genotyping of the SHS cohort, which has a long follow-up and incident events. Fine mapping of these loci and other known loci and genotyping of American Indian specific at-risk variants identified in sequencing data are needed in this population.

Prior studies have explored epidemiologic factors related to changes in eGFR and/or UACR. Most of the prior population studies have a low prevalence of albuminuria and reduction of kidney function (10,11). Here, we showed significant associations with loci relevant to kidney function and/or damage in a population of American Indians with a high prevalence of kidney disease. Therefore, our study extends the genetic findings for kidney function and UACR to American Indians, a population group that has been consistently underrepresented in genomics investigations, despite having a high prevalence of CKD.

Disclosures

None.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

The Strong Heart Study is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grants U01 HL65520, U01 HL41642, U01 HL41652, U01 HL41654, and U01 HL65521. Funding for genotyping was obtained through American Heart Association Grant 0675001N. This study was conducted in part by facility improvements funded by National Center for Research Resources Grant C06 RR013556.

Footnotes

Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

See related editorial, “Generalizability of Genetic Findings Related to Kidney Function and Albuminuria,” on pages 8–11.

References

  • 1.McClellan WM, Warnock DG, Judd S, Muntner P, Patzer RE, Bradbury BD, McClure LA, Newsome BB, Howard G: Association of family history of ESRD, prevalent albuminuria, and reduced GFR with incident ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 59: 25–31, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Freedman BI, Soucie JM, McClellan WM: Family history of end-stage renal disease among incident dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1942–1945, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mottl AK, Vupputuri S, Cole SA, Almasy L, Göring HH, Diego VP, Laston S, Franceschini N, Shara NM, Lee ET, Best LG, Fabsitz RR, MacCluer JW, Umans JG, North KE: Linkage analysis of glomerular filtration rate in American Indians. Kidney Int 74: 1185–1191, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.MacCluer JW, Scavini M, Shah VO, Cole SA, Laston SL, Voruganti VS, Paine SS, Eaton AJ, Comuzzie AG, Tentori F, Pathak DR, Bobelu A, Bobelu J, Ghahate D, Waikaniwa M, Zager PG: Heritability of measures of kidney disease among Zuni Indians: The Zuni Kidney Project. Am J Kidney Dis 56: 289–302, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fox CS, Yang Q, Cupples LA, Guo CY, Larson MG, Leip EP, Wilson PW, Levy D: Genomewide linkage analysis to serum creatinine, GFR, and creatinine clearance in a community-based population: The Framingham Heart Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 2457–2461, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Langefeld CD, Beck SR, Bowden DW, Rich SS, Wagenknecht LE, Freedman BI: Heritability of GFR and albuminuria in Caucasians with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Kidney Dis 43: 796–800, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fox CS, Yang Q, Guo CY, Cupples LA, Wilson PW, Levy D, Meigs JB: Genome-wide linkage analysis to urinary microalbuminuria in a community-based sample: The Framingham Heart Study. Kidney Int 67: 70–74, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krolewski AS, Poznik GD, Placha G, Canani L, Dunn J, Walker W, Smiles A, Krolewski B, Fogarty DG, Moczulski D, Araki S, Makita Y, Ng DP, Rogus J, Duggirala R, Rich SS, Warram JH: A genome-wide linkage scan for genes controlling variation in urinary albumin excretion in type II diabetes. Kidney Int 69: 129–136, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mottl AK, Vupputuri S, Cole SA, Almasy L, Göring HH, Diego VP, Laston S, Shara N, Lee ET, Best LG, Fabsitz RR, MacCluer JW, Umans JG, North KE: Linkage analysis of albuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 1597–1606, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Köttgen A, Pattaro C, Böger CA, Fuchsberger C, Olden M, Glazer NL, Parsa A, Gao X, Yang Q, Smith AV, O’Connell JR, Li M, Schmidt H, Tanaka T, Isaacs A, Ketkar S, Hwang SJ, Johnson AD, Dehghan A, Teumer A, Paré G, Atkinson EJ, Zeller T, Lohman K, Cornelis MC, Probst-Hensch NM, Kronenberg F, Tönjes A, Hayward C, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Launer LJ, Harris TB, Rampersaud E, Mitchell BD, Arking DE, Boerwinkle E, Struchalin M, Cavalieri M, Singleton A, Giallauria F, Metter J, de Boer IH, Haritunians T, Lumley T, Siscovick D, Psaty BM, Zillikens MC, Oostra BA, Feitosa M, Province M, de Andrade M, Turner ST, Schillert A, Ziegler A, Wild PS, Schnabel RB, Wilde S, Munzel TF, Leak TS, Illig T, Klopp N, Meisinger C, Wichmann HE, Koenig W, Zgaga L, Zemunik T, Kolcic I, Minelli C, Hu FB, Johansson A, Igl W, Zaboli G, Wild SH, Wright AF, Campbell H, Ellinghaus D, Schreiber S, Aulchenko YS, Felix JF, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Imboden M, Nitsch D, Brandstätter A, Kollerits B, Kedenko L, Mägi R, Stumvoll M, Kovacs P, Boban M, Campbell S, Endlich K, Völzke H, Kroemer HK, Nauck M, Völker U, Polasek O, Vitart V, Badola S, Parker AN, Ridker PM, Kardia SL, Blankenberg S, Liu Y, Curhan GC, Franke A, Rochat T, Paulweber B, Prokopenko I, Wang W, Gudnason V, Shuldiner AR, Coresh J, Schmidt R, Ferrucci L, Shlipak MG, van Duijn CM, Borecki I, Krämer BK, Rudan I, Gyllensten U, Wilson JF, Witteman JC, Pramstaller PP, Rettig R, Hastie N, Chasman DI, Kao WH, Heid IM, Fox CS: New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet 42: 376–384, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Köttgen A, Glazer NL, Dehghan A, Hwang SJ, Katz R, Li M, Yang Q, Gudnason V, Launer LJ, Harris TB, Smith AV, Arking DE, Astor BC, Boerwinkle E, Ehret GB, Ruczinski I, Scharpf RB, Chen YD, de Boer IH, Haritunians T, Lumley T, Sarnak M, Siscovick D, Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Upadhyay A, Aulchenko YS, Hofman A, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden AG, van Duijn CM, Chasman DI, Paré G, Ridker PM, Kao WH, Witteman JC, Coresh J, Shlipak MG, Fox CS: Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet 41: 712–717, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu CT, Garnaas MK, Tin A, Kottgen A, Franceschini N, Peralta CA, de Boer IH, Lu X, Atkinson E, Ding J, Nalls M, Shriner D, Coresh J, Kutlar A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Siscovick D, Akylbekova E, Wyatt S, Astor B, Mychaleckjy J, Li M, Reilly MP, Townsend RR, Adeyemo A, Zonderman AB, de Andrade M, Turner ST, Mosley TH, Harris TB, Rotimi CN, Liu Y, Kardia SL, Evans MK, Shlipak MG, Kramer H, Flessner MF, Dreisbach AW, Goessling W, Cupples LA, Kao WL, Fox CS, CKDGen Consortium : Genetic association for renal traits among participants of African ancestry reveals new loci for renal function. PLoS Genet 7: e1002264, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Böger CA, Chen MH, Tin A, Olden M, Köttgen A, de Boer IH, Fuchsberger C, O’Seaghdha CM, Pattaro C, Teumer A, Liu CT, Glazer NL, Li M, O’Connell JR, Tanaka T, Peralta CA, Kutalik Z, Luan J, Zhao JH, Hwang SJ, Akylbekova E, Kramer H, van der Harst P, Smith AV, Lohman K, de Andrade M, Hayward C, Kollerits B, Tönjes A, Aspelund T, Ingelsson E, Eiriksdottir G, Launer LJ, Harris TB, Shuldiner AR, Mitchell BD, Arking DE, Franceschini N, Boerwinkle E, Egan J, Hernandez D, Reilly M, Townsend RR, Lumley T, Siscovick DS, Psaty BM, Kestenbaum B, Haritunians T, Bergmann S, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Mooser V, Waterworth D, Johnson AD, Florez JC, Meigs JB, Lu X, Turner ST, Atkinson EJ, Leak TS, Aasarød K, Skorpen F, Syvänen AC, Illig T, Baumert J, Koenig W, Krämer BK, Devuyst O, Mychaleckyj JC, Minelli C, Bakker SJ, Kedenko L, Paulweber B, Coassin S, Endlich K, Kroemer HK, Biffar R, Stracke S, Völzke H, Stumvoll M, Mägi R, Campbell H, Vitart V, Hastie ND, Gudnason V, Kardia SL, Liu Y, Polasek O, Curhan G, Kronenberg F, Prokopenko I, Rudan I, Arnlöv J, Hallan S, Navis G, Parsa A, Ferrucci L, Coresh J, Shlipak MG, Bull SB, Paterson NJ, Wichmann HE, Wareham NJ, Loos RJ, Rotter JI, Pramstaller PP, Cupples LA, Beckmann JS, Yang Q, Heid IM, Rettig R, Dreisbach AW, Bochud M, Fox CS, Kao WH, CKDGen Consortium : CUBN is a gene locus for albuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 555–570, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chasman DI, Fuchsberger C, Pattaro C, Teumer A, Böger CA, Endlich K, Olden M, Chen MH, Tin A, Taliun D, Li M, Gao X, Gorski M, Yang Q, Hundertmark C, Foster MC, O’Seaghdha CM, Glazer N, Isaacs A, Liu CT, Smith AV, O’Connell JR, Struchalin M, Tanaka T, Li G, Johnson AD, Gierman HJ, Feitosa MF, Hwang SJ, Atkinson EJ, Lohman K, Cornelis MC, Johansson A, Tönjes A, Dehghan A, Lambert JC, Holliday EG, Sorice R, Kutalik Z, Lehtimäki T, Esko T, Deshmukh H, Ulivi S, Chu AY, Murgia F, Trompet S, Imboden M, Coassin S, Pistis G, Harris TB, Launer LJ, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Mitchell BD, Boerwinkle E, Schmidt H, Cavalieri M, Rao M, Hu F, Demirkan A, Oostra BA, de Andrade M, Turner ST, Ding J, Andrews JS, Freedman BI, Giulianini F, Koenig W, Illig T, Meisinger C, Gieger C, Zgaga L, Zemunik T, Boban M, Minelli C, Wheeler HE, Igl W, Zaboli G, Wild SH, Wright AF, Campbell H, Ellinghaus D, Nöthlings U, Jacobs G, Biffar R, Ernst F, Homuth G, Kroemer HK, Nauck M, Stracke S, Völker U, Völzke H, Kovacs P, Stumvoll M, Mägi R, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F, Aulchenko YS, Polasek O, Hastie N, Vitart V, Helmer C, Wang JJ, Stengel B, Ruggiero D, Bergmann S, Kähönen M, Viikari J, Nikopensius T, Province M, Ketkar S, Colhoun H, Doney A, Robino A, Krämer BK, Portas L, Ford I, Buckley BM, Adam M, Thun GA, Paulweber B, Haun M, Sala C, Mitchell P, Ciullo M, Kim SK, Vollenweider P, Raitakari O, Metspalu A, Palmer C, Gasparini P, Pirastu M, Jukema JW, Probst-Hensch NM, Kronenberg F, Toniolo D, Gudnason V, Shuldiner AR, Coresh J, Schmidt R, Ferrucci L, Siscovick DS, van Duijn CM, Borecki IB, Kardia SL, Liu Y, Curhan GC, Rudan I, Gyllensten U, Wilson JF, Franke A, Pramstaller PP, Rettig R, Prokopenko I, Witteman J, Hayward C, Ridker PM, Parsa A, Bochud M, Heid IM, Kao WH, Fox CS, Köttgen A, CARDIoGRAM Consortium. ICBP Consortium. CARe Consortium. WTCCC2 : Integration of genome-wide association studies with biological knowledge identifies six novel genes related to kidney function. Hum Mol Genet 21: 5329–5343, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pattaro C, Köttgen A, Teumer A, Garnaas M, Böger CA, Fuchsberger C, Olden M, Chen MH, Tin A, Taliun D, Li M, Gao X, Gorski M, Yang Q, Hundertmark C, Foster MC, O’Seaghdha CM, Glazer N, Isaacs A, Liu CT, Smith AV, O’Connell JR, Struchalin M, Tanaka T, Li G, Johnson AD, Gierman HJ, Feitosa M, Hwang SJ, Atkinson EJ, Lohman K, Cornelis MC, Johansson A, Tönjes A, Dehghan A, Chouraki V, Holliday EG, Sorice R, Kutalik Z, Lehtimäki T, Esko T, Deshmukh H, Ulivi S, Chu AY, Murgia F, Trompet S, Imboden M, Kollerits B, Pistis G, Harris TB, Launer LJ, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, Mitchell BD, Boerwinkle E, Schmidt H, Cavalieri M, Rao M, Hu FB, Demirkan A, Oostra BA, de Andrade M, Turner ST, Ding J, Andrews JS, Freedman BI, Koenig W, Illig T, Döring A, Wichmann HE, Kolcic I, Zemunik T, Boban M, Minelli C, Wheeler HE, Igl W, Zaboli G, Wild SH, Wright AF, Campbell H, Ellinghaus D, Nöthlings U, Jacobs G, Biffar R, Endlich K, Ernst F, Homuth G, Kroemer HK, Nauck M, Stracke S, Völker U, Völzke H, Kovacs P, Stumvoll M, Mägi R, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F, Aulchenko YS, Polasek O, Hastie N, Vitart V, Helmer C, Wang JJ, Ruggiero D, Bergmann S, Kähönen M, Viikari J, Nikopensius T, Province M, Ketkar S, Colhoun H, Doney A, Robino A, Giulianini F, Krämer BK, Portas L, Ford I, Buckley BM, Adam M, Thun GA, Paulweber B, Haun M, Sala C, Metzger M, Mitchell P, Ciullo M, Kim SK, Vollenweider P, Raitakari O, Metspalu A, Palmer C, Gasparini P, Pirastu M, Jukema JW, Probst-Hensch NM, Kronenberg F, Toniolo D, Gudnason V, Shuldiner AR, Coresh J, Schmidt R, Ferrucci L, Siscovick DS, van Duijn CM, Borecki I, Kardia SL, Liu Y, Curhan GC, Rudan I, Gyllensten U, Wilson JF, Franke A, Pramstaller PP, Rettig R, Prokopenko I, Witteman JC, Hayward C, Ridker P, Parsa A, Bochud M, Heid IM, Goessling W, Chasman DI, Kao WH, Fox CS, CARDIoGRAM Consortium. ICBP Consortium. CARe Consortium. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 (WTCCC2) : Genome-wide association and functional follow-up reveals new loci for kidney function. PLoS Genet 8: e1002584, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Genovese G, Friedman DJ, Ross MD, Lecordier L, Uzureau P, Freedman BI, Bowden DW, Langefeld CD, Oleksyk TK, Uscinski Knob AL, Bernhardy AJ, Hicks PJ, Nelson GW, Vanhollebeke B, Winkler CA, Kopp JB, Pays E, Pollak MR: Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science 329: 841–845, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kao WH, Klag MJ, Meoni LA, Reich D, Berthier-Schaad Y, Li M, Coresh J, Patterson N, Tandon A, Powe NR, Fink NE, Sadler JH, Weir MR, Abboud HE, Adler SG, Divers J, Iyengar SK, Freedman BI, Kimmel PL, Knowler WC, Kohn OF, Kramp K, Leehey DJ, Nicholas SB, Pahl MV, Schelling JR, Sedor JR, Thornley-Brown D, Winkler CA, Smith MW, Parekh RS, Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes Research Group : MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans. Nat Genet 40: 1185–1192, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kopp JB, Smith MW, Nelson GW, Johnson RC, Freedman BI, Bowden DW, Oleksyk T, McKenzie LM, Kajiyama H, Ahuja TS, Berns JS, Briggs W, Cho ME, Dart RA, Kimmel PL, Korbet SM, Michel DM, Mokrzycki MH, Schelling JR, Simon E, Trachtman H, Vlahov D, Winkler CA: MYH9 is a major-effect risk gene for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet 40: 1175–1184, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robbins DC, Knowler WC, Lee ET, Yeh J, Go OT, Welty T, Fabsitz R, Howard BV: Regional differences in albuminuria among American Indians: An epidemic of renal disease. Kidney Int 49: 557–563, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stidley CA, Shah VO, Narva AS, Dalton D, MacCluer JW, Bobelu A, Scavini M, Welty TK, Zager PG: A population-based, cross-sectional survey of the Zuni Pueblo: A collaborative approach to an epidemic of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 39: 358–368, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jolly SE, Li S, Chen SC, Narva AS, Jurkovitz CT, Norris KC, Shlipak MG: Risk factors for chronic kidney disease among American Indians and Alaska Natives—findings from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program. Am J Nephrol 29: 440–446, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Franceschini N, Voruganti VS, Haack K, Almasy L, Laston S, Goring HH, Umans JG, Lee ET, Best LG, Fabsitz RR, MacCluer JW, Howard BV, North KE, Cole SA: The association of the MYH9 gene and kidney outcomes in American Indians: The Strong Heart Family Study. Hum Genet 127: 295–301, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.North KE, Williams JT, Welty TK, Best LG, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV, MacCluer JW: Evidence for joint action of genes on diabetes status and CVD risk factors in American Indians: The strong heart family study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27: 491–497, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee ET, Welty TK, Fabsitz R, Cowan LD, Le NA, Oopik AJ, Cucchiara AJ, Savage PJ, Howard BV: The Strong Heart Study. A study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: Design and methods. Am J Epidemiol 132: 1141–1155, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.North KE, Howard BV, Welty TK, Best LG, Lee ET, Yeh JL, Fabsitz RR, Roman MJ, MacCluer JW: Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular disease risk in American Indians: The strong heart family study. Am J Epidemiol 157: 303–314, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.American Diabetes Association : Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 32[Suppl 1]: S62–S67, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Jr, Roccella EJ, Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee : Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42: 1206–1252, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group : A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 130: 461–470, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Sing CF: The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods. Ann Hum Genet 50: 181–194, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: 177–188, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Almasy L, Blangero J: Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet 62: 1198–1211, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Havill LM, Dyer TD, Richardson DK, Mahaney MC, Blangero J: The quantitative trait linkage disequilibrium test: A more powerful alternative to the quantitative transmission disequilibrium test for use in the absence of population stratification. BMC Genet 6[Suppl 1]: S91, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68: 978–989, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cheverud JM: A simple correction for multiple comparisons in interval mapping genome scans. Heredity (Edinb) 87: 52–58, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nyholt DR: A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74: 765–769, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Böger CA, Gorski M, Li M, Hoffmann MM, Huang C, Yang Q, Teumer A, Krane V, O’Seaghdha CM, Kutalik Z, Wichmann HE, Haak T, Boes E, Coassin S, Coresh J, Kollerits B, Haun M, Paulweber B, Köttgen A, Li G, Shlipak MG, Powe N, Hwang SJ, Dehghan A, Rivadeneira F, Uitterlinden A, Hofman A, Beckmann JS, Krämer BK, Witteman J, Bochud M, Siscovick D, Rettig R, Kronenberg F, Wanner C, Thadhani RI, Heid IM, Fox CS, Kao WH, CKDGen Consortium : Association of eGFR-related loci identified by GWAS with incident CKD and ESRD. PLoS Genet 7: e1002292, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Okada Y, Sim X, Go MJ, Wu JY, Gu D, Takeuchi F, Takahashi A, Maeda S, Tsunoda T, Chen P, Lim SC, Wong TY, Liu J, Young TL, Aung T, Seielstad M, Teo YY, Kim YJ, Lee JY, Han BG, Kang D, Chen CH, Tsai FJ, Chang LC, Fann SJ, Mei H, Rao DC, Hixson JE, Chen S, Katsuya T, Isono M, Ogihara T, Chambers JC, Zhang W, Kooner JS, Albrecht E, Yamamoto K, Kubo M, Nakamura Y, Kamatani N, Kato N, He J, Chen YT, Cho YS, Tai ES, Tanaka T, KidneyGen Consortium. CKDGen Consortium. GUGC consortium : Meta-analysis identifies multiple loci associated with kidney function-related traits in east Asian populations. Nat Genet 44: 904–909, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ganesh SK, Zakai NA, van Rooij FJ, Soranzo N, Smith AV, Nalls MA, Chen MH, Kottgen A, Glazer NL, Dehghan A, Kuhnel B, Aspelund T, Yang Q, Tanaka T, Jaffe A, Bis JC, Verwoert GC, Teumer A, Fox CS, Guralnik JM, Ehret GB, Rice K, Felix JF, Rendon A, Eiriksdottir G, Levy D, Patel KV, Boerwinkle E, Rotter JI, Hofman A, Sambrook JG, Hernandez DG, Zheng G, Bandinelli S, Singleton AB, Coresh J, Lumley T, Uitterlinden AG, Vangils JM, Launer LJ, Cupples LA, Oostra BA, Zwaginga JJ, Ouwehand WH, Thein SL, Meisinger C, Deloukas P, Nauck M, Spector TD, Gieger C, Gudnason V, van Duijn CM, Psaty BM, Ferrucci L, Chakravarti A, Greinacher A, O’Donnell CJ, Witteman JC, Furth S, Cushman M, Harris TB, Lin JP: Multiple loci influence erythrocyte phenotypes in the CHARGE Consortium. Nat Genet 41: 1191–1198, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vanhamme L, Paturiaux-Hanocq F, Poelvoorde P, Nolan DP, Lins L, Van Den Abbeele J, Pays A, Tebabi P, Van Xong H, Jacquet A, Moguilevsky N, Dieu M, Kane JP, De Baetselier P, Brasseur R, Pays E: Apolipoprotein L-I is the trypanosome lytic factor of human serum. Nature 422: 83–87, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kronenberg F: APOL1 variants and kidney disease. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26: 775–778, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN are provided here courtesy of American Society of Nephrology

RESOURCES