Skip to main content
Genome Biology and Evolution logoLink to Genome Biology and Evolution
letter
. 2013 Dec 10;5(12):2540–2548. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt205

Is ftsH the Key to Plastid Longevity in Sacoglossan Slugs?

Jan de Vries 1,, Jörn Habicht 1,, Christian Woehle 1, Changjie Huang 1, Gregor Christa 2, Heike Wägele 2, Jörg Nickelsen 3, William F Martin 1, Sven B Gould 1,*
PMCID: PMC3879987  PMID: 24336424

Abstract

Plastids sequestered by sacoglossan sea slugs have long been a puzzle. Some sacoglossans feed on siphonaceous algae and can retain the plastids in the cytosol of their digestive gland cells. There, the stolen plastids (kleptoplasts) can remain photosynthetically active in some cases for months. Kleptoplast longevity itself challenges current paradigms concerning photosystem turnover, because kleptoplast photosystems remain active in the absence of nuclear algal genes. In higher plants, nuclear genes are essential for plastid maintenance, in particular, for the constant repair of the D1 protein of photosystem II. Lateral gene transfer was long suspected to underpin slug kleptoplast longevity, but recent transcriptomic and genomic analyses show that no algal nuclear genes are expressed from the slug nucleus. Kleptoplast genomes themselves, however, appear expressed in the sequestered state. Here we present sequence data for the chloroplast genome of Acetabularia acetabulum, the food source of the sacoglossan Elysia timida, which can maintain Acetabularia kleptoplasts in an active state for months. The data reveal what might be the key to sacoglossan kleptoplast longevity: plastids that remain photosynthetically active within slugs for periods of months share the property of encoding ftsH, a D1 quality control protease that is essential for photosystem II repair. In land plants, ftsH is always nuclear encoded, it was transferred to the nucleus from the plastid genome when Charophyta and Embryophyta split. A replenishable supply of ftsH could, in principle, rescue kleptoplasts from D1 photodamage, thereby influencing plastid longevity in sacoglossan slugs.

Keywords: sacoglossa, plastid genomes, photosystem II, D1, ftsH, light stress

Introduction

Several groups of animals enter into symbiotic relationships with algae, the zoochlorellae of Hydra being a well-known example (Habetha et al. 2003; Kawaida et al. 2013). Sacoglossan slugs are unique, however, in that they perform photosynthesis and fix carbon in a light-dependent manner using plastids that they sequester from the algae upon which they feed (Greene 1970; Marín and Ros 1989; Händeler et al. 2009). Five species among the sacoglossan slugs—Elysia chlorotica, E. timida, E. crispata, E. clarki, and Plakobranchus ocellatus—perform what is called long-term retention (LtR) of sequestered plastids (kleptoplasts). That is, when adult animals are given the opportunity to graze upon their preferred algal food source, they can survive subsequent starvation for up to several months, during which time they maintain active plastids with functional photosystems (Mujer et al. 1996; Pierce et al. 2006; Händeler et al. 2009), giving the slugs their characteristic green color (fig. 1). Though often described as “solar-powered slugs,” it is not yet clear how, exactly, the slugs benefit from the kleptoplasts, as recent findings show that plastid-bearing E. timida and P. ocellatus survive starvation for months in the dark just as well as they do in the light (Christa et al. 2014). LtR species are distinguished from short-term retention (StR) species, the ingested plastids of which lose their photosynthetic ability rapidly over the first 2 weeks of starvation and are more rapidly digested than in LtR species (Händeler et al. 2009; Klochkova et al. 2013). Both LtR and StR sacoglossans feed by tapping the plastid-rich cytosol of siphonaceous algae, which have large cells, centimeters or more in length.

Fig. 1.—

Fig. 1.—

The sacoglossan sea slug Elysia timida feeds on the ulvophyte alga Acetabularia acetabulum. The sequestered kleptoplasts continue to perform photosynthesis for up to several months within specialized cells of the digestive gland of the slug.

Because photosystems are known to have a relatively high rate of protein turnover in higher plants and algae studied so far (Aro et al. 1993; Lindahl et al. 2000; Komenda et al. 2012), it was long speculated that the nuclear genomes of LtR species acquired genes of algal origin via lateral gene transfer (LGT): genes that encode products such as light harvesting complex proteins or psbO (Pierce et al. 2007; Rumpho et al. 2008) might help to maintain plastids in an active state by servicing the photosystems. A problem with the LGT hypothesis was that ability to perform LtR arose in multiple sacoglossan lineages independently, complicating the number and nature of putative transfers (Wägele et al. 2011). Moreover, direct tests of the LGT hypothesis using deep sequencing on E. timida and P. ocellatus (Wägele et al. 2011) and later on E. chlorotica (Rumpho et al. 2011) showed that plastid-bearing LtR sacoglossans do not express any genes of algal origin. Genome sequence data for E. chlorotica eggs furthermore showed that the slugs do not harbor algal DNA (Bhattacharya et al. 2013). Accordingly, LGT cannot be the mechanism underlying kleptoplast survival. In search of an explanation for kleptoplast longevity in LtR sacoglossans, we revisit square one.

LtR Slugs Feed on Specific Algae

There is a distinct trend among LtR slugs to specialize and often feed on a single algal species. The preferred algal species, however, are very different for different slug species and come from very distant corners of plastid diversity. E. chlorotica ingests plastids from Vaucheria litorea, a xanthophyte alga housing a plastid of secondary endosymbiotic (red algal) origin (Rumpho et al. 2001; Archibald 2009; Gould 2012), while E. timida ingests plastids from the ulvophyte green alga Acetabularia acetabulum (fig. 1; Marín and Ros 1989). These two slugs—together with P. ocellatus the slugs with greatest kleptoplast longevity—feed and survive from just the one species of alga upon which they have specialized. The closely related E. crispata and E. clarki sequester plastids from ulvophytes, namely Halimeda, Bryopsis, Batophora, Caulerpa, Penicillus, and Codium (Clark and Busacca 1978; Curtis et al. 2006). Plakobranchus ocellatus steals plastids from various algae, too, but during starvation, then strikingly retains only those of Halimeda (Christa et al. 2013). We have observed the same to occur in starvation experiments on E. clarki, during which plastids of Halimeda were detectable two weeks after the onset of starvation, while plastids of Bryposis were not, suggesting that the latter had been digested while the former had been retained. This was determined using a barcoding approach that, for P. ocellatus, recently provided similar results (Christa et al. 2013). Yet, if not all ingested plastids in LtR slugs are retained, could kleptoplast longevity in slugs be partly attributable to properties of the plastids themselves? We examined the issue from the perspective of plastid genomes.

Plastid Genomes of Vaucheria and Acetabularia are United by Encoding ftsH and tufA

The plastids sequestered by the different LtR species belong to algae from quite distantly related lineages, but could they have something in common that has been so far overlooked? The plastid genome of V. litorea, whose plastids remain photosynthetically active for up to 10 months in the slugs (Green et al. 2000), was already fully sequenced in the course of studies on E. chlorotica (Rumpho et al. 2008). No chloroplast genome sequence, however, was available for A. acetabulum, the sole food source of E. timida. The A. acetabulum plastid genome has been found to contain large repetitive elements (Tymms and Schweiger 1985) and estimated to reach a size of around 2,000 kb (Manhart et al. 1989). Through centrifugation, we generated a DNA fraction that was enriched for A. acetabulum plastid DNA and by shotgun sequencing of this chloroplast-enriched fraction, we obtained 138,285 kb of vector-trimmed raw data, from which we identified and assembled 63 contigs encoding proteins homologous to known plastid proteins of the UTC clade (Ulvophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, and Chlorophyceae) of green algae. Of these contigs, 39 encoded full-length genes (table 1). These contigs had an average coverage of 56-fold (see supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online) and an AT content of 69%, which is comparable to that of the ulvophyceans Pseudendoclonium akinetum (68.5%) and Bryopsis hypnoides (66.9%; Pombert et al. 2005; Lü et al. 2011). All contigs together represent a total length of approximately 350 kb, but we estimate the complete genome to be substantially larger, possibly as big as the 2,000 kb estimate of Manhart et al. (1989). Intron and intergenic region lengths, for example—often many kilobases long—by far exceed those identified from plastid genomes of related ulvophycean algae, whose genomes are less than 200 kb long (Pombert et al. 2005, 2006; Lü et al. 2011). The same is true for open reading frames with no homology to known genes. Next to the rpoC2 locus for example sits a 7,785 bp long open reading frame, potentially encoding a protein of 303 kDa with no significant similarity (e-value cutoff 10−10) to any known proteins (fig. 2). Among the 51 protein coding genes with homology to common plastid genes, and for which we have full-length sequences (table 1), were ftsH and tufA, two proteins that we suggest in the following to be of particular interest with regard to understanding plastid longevity. These two genes are also encoded by the plastid genome of V. litorea (fig. 3; Rumpho et al. 2008), sole food source of E. chlorotica.

Table 1.

List of the 51 Full-Length Plastid Encoded Genes of Acetabularia acetabulum Identified

Gene ORF Length (bp) Contig Length (bp) AT Content Presence/Absence
Accession
P. a. O. v. B. h.
accD 885 13,807 69.4 HG18425
atpA* 1,509 8,868 65.9 HG18426
atpB* 1,440 2,571 65.9 HG18427
atpE_1* 399 5,694 66.2 HG18428
atpE_2 399 5,972 57.1 na
atpF 518 4,705 73.3 HG18429
atpH* 249 59.8 HG18430
chlB 1,575 2,407 67.3 HG18431
chlI 1,107 3,272 66.3 HG18432
chlL 864 16,526 70.1 HG18433
chlN 1,461 68.8 HG18434
psbM 105 76.2 HG18450
clpP 591 4,065 66.3 HG18435
cysA 693 2,504 72.0 HG18436
cysT 804 6,564 73.5 HG18437
ftsH 13,488 19,263 62.3 HG18438
infA 207 11,475 72.0 HG18439
rpl5 540 73.5 HG18462
rpl14* 369 69.1 HG18456
rps8* 414 74.2 HG18469
petA 924 3,120 71.5 HG18440
petB 648 4,808 67.1 HG18441
petD 462 65.6 HG18442
petG* 102 3,226 66.7 HG18443
psaB 2,082 3,305 59.1 HG18444
psaC 246 7,361 62.6 HG18445
psaJ 126 29,133 75.4 HG18446
psbJ 129 61.2 HG18448
ycf4 354 74.6 HG18474
psbA 1,035 9,700 59.5 HG794360
psbB 1,419 5,607 62.4 HG18447
psbK 132 7,445 70.5 HG18449
ycf12 102 75.5 HG18472
psbN* 135 6,264 72.6 HG18451
psbT* 96 5,851 71.9 HG18452
psbZ 189 4,962 72.5 HG18453
rbcL_1* 1,458 3,336 61.5 HG18454
rbcL_2 1,089 2,658 61.5 na
rpl12 528 7,371 68.4 HG18455
rps9 477 69.6 HG18470
rpl16* 429 4,236 64.6 HG18457
rpl19 339 4,654 76.7 HG18458
rpl2* 768 18,092 66.0 HG18459
rpl23 288 76.7 HG18461
rps19* 279 69.2 HG18466
rpl20* 351 5,356 78.4 HG18460
rps11* 381 9,845 63.5 HG18463
rps14* 303 8,626 72.6 HG18464
rps18 240 3,236 74.2 HG18465
rps4 609 5,619 73.7 HG18467
rps7* 471 16,827 67.5 HG18468
tufA 1,230 4,583 65.9 HG18471
ycf3 516 2,750 67.4 HG18473

Note.—The second column shows the gene length, the third column the contig length. For contigs encoding more than one gene, the length is given once. Final columns indicate presence/absence of the genes from the plastid genomes of the related Pseudendoclonium akinetum, Oltmannsiellopsis viridis, and Bryopsis hypnoides. Genes marked with an asterisk were used for the phylogeny shown in figure 3.

Fig. 2.—

Fig. 2.—

Sequencing contigs of the A. acetabulum plastid genome. Shown are contigs in comparison to the corresponding parts of the fully sequenced plastid genome of the phylogenetically related Pseudendoclonium akinetum encoding identical genes. The comparison illustrates the expansion of most intergenic and intron regions, and the increase in introns and open reading frames (ORFs ≥300 bp shown in gray) in Acetabularia. Orf2594 encodes a hypothetical protein of 303 kDa within an apparent intron of rpoC2. Although the RNA polymerase rpoC2 in P. akinetum is encoded by a single reading frame, in A. acetabulum it is highly fragmented across many dozen kilobase pairs. Many contigs assembled encode only a single gene (e.g., accD or rps7). Note that psbA is highly fragmented in both P. akinetum and A. acetabulum. Numbers beneath gene names represent the amino acid positions in the homolog of P. akinetum. Distance between two vertical gray lines in the background is 1 kbp.

Fig. 3.—

Fig. 3.—

ftsH and tufA are encoded by the majority of algal plastid genomes. Different genes were lost from plastid genomes at different time points throughout evolution. TatC, for example, is only retained in plastid genomes of the red lineage, while psbA and atpA, for instance, are encoded by the plastid genomes of all 51 organisms analyzed. The majority of algae and water, but not land-dwelling streptophytes (embryophyta), encode ftsH and tufA on their plastid genomes. The cladogram is based on a multigene phylogeny of 17 genes (table 1) that are shared by all plastid genomes shown. Top left corner shows details on the three algae (in bold), whose plastids are being sequestered by slugs. Note the absence of ftsH in Bryopsis hypoides.

When we compared plastid genome data of algae and plants, it became apparent that in particular land plant plastids lack several genes commonly encoded by plastid genomes of a large variety of different algae, from the red, as well as the green lineage (rhodophytes and chlorophytes, respectively; fig. 3). Among those genes was the protease encoding ftsH—a protein essential for photosystem II maintenance—and tufA encoding the translation elongation factor Tu (Watson and Surzycki 1982). Early studies showed that sequestered plastids of V. litorea actively continue to transcribe and translate plastid-encoded psbA (Mujer et al. 1996), encoding the D1 protein of photosystem II, and transcripts of the V. litorea plastid-encoded ftsH and tufA were further found among RNA of E. chlorotica that had been starved for 2 months (Pierce et al. 2012). We found evidence for the presence of all three transcripts in E. timida slugs that had been starved for 1 month (fig. 4). Moreover, translation of ftsH transcript would be impaired in the absence of the crucial elongation factor Tu encoded by tufA. A replenishable supply of these gene products might be key to long-term plastid activity in slugs. How so?

Fig. 4.—

Fig. 4.—

Transcripts of tufA, psbA and ftsH are present in starving Elysia timida. We isolated total RNA from slugs that had been starved for 1 month (31 days) and performed nonquantitative reverse-transcriptase PCRs to screen for the presence of mRNA of the three genes tufA, psbA, and ftsH in starving E. timida slugs (E. t.). RNA of A. acetabulum (A. a.) served as an additional positive control. +RT/−RT indicates the presence or absence of the reverse-transcriptase enzyme in the reaction.

ftsH Might Protect Kleptoplasts from Photodamage

Photosystem turnover in sequestered plastids of A. acetabulum and V. litorea, two preferred plastid sources for LtR slugs, has not been directly studied so far. Inferences for our hypothesis come from studies of model systems. Constant photodamage in land plant plastids demands a high level of protein import from the cytosol to replace affected components of the photosystems (Aro et al. 1993; Sakamoto et al. 2003; Nixon et al. 2010). Photosystem II (PSII), in particular its D1 protein, is affected the most by photodamage, and the latter is also a major culprit regarding subsequent damage, as a degenerate D1 leads to an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Nishiyama et al. 2006; Kato et al. 2009). Downstream, ROS not only affect a large variety of other biochemical pathways (Girotti 2001; Apel and Hirt 2004) but further inhibit the repair of the photosystem itself (Nishiyama et al. 2006). Essential for the repair of a damaged PSII is the removal of the faulty D1 protein, a process that is mainly mediated by the ftsH protease complex in plants and cyanobacteria (Nixon et al. 2010; Komenda et al. 2012). That observation is central to our arguments.

In organelles, ftsH proteins act as quality control proteases, as either hetero- or homo-oligomers (Janska et al. 2013). Twelve ftsH genes are encoded in the Arabidopsis thaliana nuclear genome, nine of which are targeted to the plastid (Sakamoto et al. 2003). Although all chloroplast-targeted ftsH proteases in the land plant can apparently assemble into functional hetero-oligomers—always consisting of A-type and B-type subunits—in mitochondria, the functional ftsH complex can consist of only a homo-oligomer (Janska et al. 2013). Furthermore, only one subunit needs to contain the functional proteolytic M41 domain (Zhang et al. 2010). In variegated Arabidopsis mutants, the loss of only a single ftsH gene results in high levels of accumulated ROS in the plastids, causing severe damage to the entire plant (Kato et al. 2009). As the plastid-specific ftsH gene is nuclear encoded in all land plants (fig. 3), the protease needs to be imported from the cytosol. In plastids sequestered by the slugs feeding only on one algal species, it is encoded by the plastid itself. This could explain why LtR species that feed on more than one algal species do not retain the ulvophyte Bryopsis—it does not encode ftsH on its plastid genome (fig. 3)—during prolonged starvation periods. The correlation between plastid-encoded ftsH and LtR deserves further study in algal grazing experiments.

Robust Plastids

That the plastids from some algal lineages, including ulvophytes, are more robust than land plant plastids was noted 40 years ago (Giles and Sarafis 1972). It was suggested that such robustness, sometimes bordering on apparent plastid autonomy, might be linked to the prolonged survival of plastids in what are now called LtR slugs (Trench et al. 1973; Rumpho et al. 2001). Although the reason(s) underlying the robustness of plastids that sacoglossans sequester remained obscure, the role of light stress and photodamage to PSII, in particular, has always figured prominently in the issue of sacoglossan plastid longevity (reviewed in Rumpho et al. [2011] and Cruz et al. [2013]). In that tradition, Jesus et al. (2010) recently showed, for Acetabularia plastids sequestered within in E. timida, that PSII recovers remarkably well subsequent to bleaching; they furthermore noted that “… E. timida kleptoplasts retain A. acetabulum photo-damage repair mechanisms … .”

Here we are suggesting that kleptoplast robustness and photodamage repair at PSII are causally related, and that this conceivably could be attributable to only one or a few factors, with ftsH playing a pivotal role. Our reasoning here is guided by the observation that protein synthesis in land plant plastids has two temporally distinct roles: 1) biogenesis of the photosynthetic apparatus followed by 2) the maintenance phase during which the repair of photodamaged PSII in particular plays the most prominent role (Nixon et al. 2010; Yao et al. 2012; Nickelsen and Rengstl 2013). Sacoglossans have no need for thylakoid biogenesis, as they acquire mature plastids, leaving the maintenance role as a possible factor.

If the kleptoplasts are robust, which they are, then either the slugs actively render them robust, or their robustness is an intrinsic property, or a combination of the two. The observation that most sacoglossans simply digest all ingested plastids, regardless of their source (Händeler et al. 2009; Christa et al. 2013), indicates that LtR species specifically provide an environment where plastids can persist. The observation that some LtR species such as Plakobranchus ingest plastids from several sources but retain only those from Halimeda long-term as kleptoplasts (Christa et al. 2013) suggests that the ability to persist is a property intrinsic to the plastids. Plakobranchus could also selectively digest some plastids faster than others, implying the existence of digestive recognition mechanisms for individual food particles. But selective digestion, even if it exists, would still not explain why some kleptoplasts can survive for so long within slugs, again pointing to plastid intrinsic properties. Because ftsH connects PSII repair to a plastid intrinsic property—being plastid-encoded—in plastids that undergo LtR, it emerges as a prime candidate for a causal factor behind plastid longevity. A clear prediction of this hypothesis is that Acetabularia plastids should be particularly robust to high light intensities and recover faster from light stress, both in algae but especially in slugs, in comparison to plastids that lack ftsH genes, such as those of Bryopsis. A further implication of these findings is that they might open new avenues of pursuit for the engineering of higher plant plastids with increased tolerance to light stress.

Conclusion

Genes for ftsH and tufA are absent from the plastid genomes of higher plants (Martin et al. 1998), but present in the genomes of most algal plastids, including those that are currently known for being sequestered by LtR sacoglossan slugs (fig. 3). Thus, we posit—and it remains to be tested—that the gene content of A. acetabulum and V. litorea plastid genomes is directly involved in LtR of kleptoplasts. By bringing along their own replenishable supply of ftsH, these plastids might be better able to service photosystem II by removing the damaged D1 protein in kleptoplasts. Hereby, they are better equipped for an extended “life” in a foreign cytosol than plastids that are dependent upon ftsH that is nuclear encoded and must be imported. By similar reasoning, a replenishable supply of tufA might aid sustained plastid translation, though our current focus is on ftsH. It is possible that the slugs do not directly provide any supporting functions at all in terms of proteins targeted to the organelle to help the kleptoplasts stay photosynthetically active for months in the cytosol of digestive gland cells. Even if D1 replacement does not occur in kleptoplasts, its removal by ftsH would prevent ROS damage and thus enhance longevity. Kleptoplast-encoded ftsH warrants further investigation regarding the nature of plastid longevity, not only in kleptoplasts of sacoglossan slugs.

Materials and Methods

The A. acetabulum DI1 strain we use to maintain lab cultures of E. timida was originally obtained from Prof. Menzel (Bonn, Germany) and grown at a 12 h/12 h light/dark rhythm, illuminated with 25 µm quanta m−2s−1 in 3.7% sea water (Tropic Marin). The plastids of A. acetabulum were isolated as previously described (Tymms and Schweiger 1985) but with penicillin–streptomycin (10 ml/l) and chloramphenicol (200 mg/l) added 48 h prior to the plastid isolation to reduce bacterial contamination. After disruption and filtration of the algal homogenate, the flowthrough was incubated for 30 min with lysozyme (2 mg/ml) and subsequently treated with 1 mg/ml DNase (Roche) for 1.5 h. As a final step, plastid DNA was extracted using Plant DNAzol (Invitrogen). DNA was sequenced using Roche GS FLX+system (GATC Biotech).

The 138,285 kb of vector-trimmed raw data (289,644 reads in total with a mean average read length of 477 bp) were manually assembled in packages using Sequencher V5.1 (gene codes). Assembly parameters for the first run were a minimum match percentage of 98 and a minimum overlap of 50, followed by a second assembly with a minimum match percentage of 90 and identical minimum overlap. There are 1,768 contigs (300 bp long with ≥10 reads/contig), and for 91 of them (average coverage of 56×), the best blast hits are plastid-encoded genes (e-value better than 10−10). Only three contigs with coverage greater than 10-fold (average coverage of 14×) hit genes of potentially eukaryotic nuclear origin by the criterion of sequence similarity, but those three hits are sequences of low complexity. Although there were several bacterial and mitochondrial sequences among our >10× contigs, there is very little, if any, demonstrably algal nuclear contamination within our sequenced >10× contigs (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary Material online), for which reason it seems likely that our plastid-related sequences represent bona fide Acetabularia plastid DNA, not nuclear pseudogenes thereof (“nupts”). Contigs of ≥1,000 bp length were screened for genes with homology to the plastid genomes of the UTC clade, and the coding sequences of identified genes (table 1) deposited at European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) (HG518425-74; HG794360) and reads submitted to the sequence read archive (SRR1038494). To generate the cladogram (fig. 3), protein sequences of plastid genomes were first downloaded from NCBI (September 2013). Orthologous gene clusters were then generated using BlastP (Altschul et al. 1997, Tatusov et al. 2001), then Needle (Rice et al. 2000) and Markov Cluster Algorithm (MCL) (Enright et al. 2002). Based on the 50 genes assembled for A. acetabulum (table 1), 17 universal clusters (genes) were identified that were encoded by all plastid genomes screened. These clusters were aligned by Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) (Katoh et al. 2002) and concatenated, followed by tree construction using PhyML (Guindon et al. 2010).

RNA was extracted from four animals that had starved for 31 days using TRIzol (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, but with an additional DNase treatment (ThermoScientific). Reverse transcriptase PCRs were carried out using iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit from BioRad and the Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs). Primers used were: ftsHf 5′-CTGCAGAAAAGGTTTGGAGGC-3′, ftsHr 5′-GTCCGAGGGGAGTTGACTTG-3′; psbAf 5′-TGCATGGCCTGTAATCGGAA-3′, psbAr 5′-CGGTTGATAACGTCAGCCCA-3′; tufAf 5′-GCAAAACAAGTTGGCGTTCC-3′, tufAr 5′-GGCTAATAAAGCAGACCCGGA-3′.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figure S1 is available at Genome Biology and Evolution online (http://www.gbe.oxfordjournals.org/).

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a German Research Foundation (DFG) grant to S.B.G. and an European Research Council (ERC) grant to W.F.M. We thank Steffen Köhler (CAi, HHU Düsseldorf) for help with the images and Margarete Stracke for alga and slug culturing.

Literature Cited

  1. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archibald JM. The puzzle of plastid evolution. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R81–R88. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Altschul SF, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;35:3389–3342. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aro EM, Virgin I, Andersson B. Photoinhibition of photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1143:113–134. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhattacharya D, Pelletreau KN, Price DC, Sarver KE, Rumpho ME. Genome analysis of Elysia chlorotica egg DNA provides no evidence for horizontal gene transfer into the germ line of this kleptoplastic mollusc. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1843–1852. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christa G, Wescott L, Schäberle TF, König GM, Wägele H. What remains after 2 months of starvation? Analysis of sequestered algae in a photosynthetic slug, Plakobranchus ocellatus (Sacoglossa, Opisthobranchia), by barcoding. Planta. 2013;237:559–572. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1788-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Christa G, et al. Plastid-bearing sea slugs fix CO2 in the light but do not require photosynthesis to survive. Proc R Soc B. 2014;281:20132493. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark KB, Busacca M. Feeding specificity and chloroplast retention in four tropical Ascoglossa, with a discussion of the extent of chloroplast symbiosis and the evolution of the order. J Mollus Stud. 1978;44:272–282. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruz S, Calado R, Serôdio J, Cartaxana P. Crawling leaves: photosynthesis in sacoglossan sea slugs. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:3999–4009. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Curtis NE, Massey SE, Pierce SK. The symbiotic chloroplasts in the sacoglossan Elysia clarki are from several algal species. Invertebr Biol. 2006;125:336–345. [Google Scholar]
  11. Enright AJ, van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA. An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1575–1584. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.7.1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Giles KL, Sarafis V. Chloroplast survival and division in vitro. Nat New Biol. 1972;236:56–58. doi: 10.1038/newbio236056a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Girotti AW. Photosensitized oxidation of membrane lipids: reaction pathways, cytotoxic effects, and cytoprotective mechanisms. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001;63:103–113. doi: 10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00207-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gould SB. Algae's complex origins. Nature. 2012;492:46–48. doi: 10.1038/nature11759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Green BJ, et al. Mollusc-algal chloroplast endosymbiosis. Photosynthesis, thylakoid protein maintenance, and chloroplast gene expression continue for many months in the absence of the algal nucleus. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:331–342. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.1.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Greene RW. Symbiosis in sacoglossan opisthobranchs—functional capacity of symbiotic chloroplasts. Mar Biol. 1970;7:138–142. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Habetha M, Anton-Erxleben F, Neumann K, Bosch TCG. The Hydra viridis/Chlorella symbiosis. Growth and sexual differentiation in polyps without symbionts. Zoology. 2003;106:101–108. doi: 10.1078/0944-2006-00104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Händeler K, Grzymbowski YP, Krug PJ, Wägele H. Functional chloroplasts in metazoan cells—a unique evolutionary strategy in animal life. Front Zool. 2009;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Janska H, Kwasniak M, Szczepanowska J. Protein quality control in organelles—AAA/FTSH story. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jesus B, Ventura P, Calado G. Behaviour and a functional xanthophyll cycle enhance photo-regulation mechanisms in the solar-powered sea slug Elysia timida (Risso, 1818) J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2010;395:98–105. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kato Y, Miura E, Ido K, Ifuku K, Sakamoto W. The variegated mutants lacking chloroplastic FTSHs are defective in D1 degradation and accumulate reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:1790–1801. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.146589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kawaida H, et al. Symbiosis between hydra and chlorella: molecular phylogenetic analysis and experimental study provide insight into its origin and evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;66:906–914. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klochkova TA, et al. Morphology, molecular phylogeny and photosynthetic activity of the sacoglossan mollusc, Elysia nigrocapitata, from Korea. Mar Biol. 2013;160:155–168. [Google Scholar]
  26. Komenda J, Sobotka R, Nixon PJ. Assembling and maintaining the photosystem II complex in chloroplasts and cyanobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindahl M, et al. The thylakoid FTSH protease plays a role in the light-induced turnover of the photosystem II D1 protein. Plant Cell. 2000;12:419–431. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.3.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lü F, et al. The Bryopsis hypnoides plastid genome: multimeric forms and complete nucleotide sequence. PLoS One. 2011;6: e14663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Manhart JR, Kelly K, Dudock BS, Palmer JD. Unusual characteristics of Codium fragile chloroplast DNA revealed by physical and gene mapping. Mol Genet Genomics. 1989;216:417–421. doi: 10.1007/BF00334385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marín A, Ros JD. The chloroplast-animal association in four iberian sacoglossan opisthobranchs: Elysia timida, Elysia translucens, Thuridilla hopei and Bosellia mimetica. Sci Mar. 1989;53:429–440. [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin W, et al. Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature. 1998;393:162–165. doi: 10.1038/30234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mujer CV, Andrews DL, Manhart JR, Pierce SK, Rumpho ME. Chloroplast genes are expressed during intracellular symbiotic association of Vaucheria litorea plastids with the sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:12333–12338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nickelsen J, Rengstl B. Photosystem II assembly: from cyanobacteria to plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:609–635. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nishiyama Y, Allakhverdiev SI, Murata S. A new paradigm for the action of reactive oxygen species in the photoinhibition of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nixon PJ, Michoux F, Yu J, Boehm M, Komenda J. Recent advances in understanding the assembly and repair of photosystem II. Ann Bot. 2010;106:1–16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pierce SK, Curtis NE, Hanten JJ, Boerner SL, Schwartz JA. Transfer, integration and expression of functional nuclear genes between multicellular species. Symbiosis. 2007;43:57–64. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pierce SK, et al. A morphological and molecular comparison between Elysia crispata and a new species of kleptoplastic sacoglossan sea slug (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) from the Florida Keys, USA. Mollusc Res. 2006;26:23–38. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pierce SK, et al. Transcriptomic evidence for the expression of horizontally transferred algal nuclear genes in the photosynthetic sea slug, Elysia chlorotica. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1545–1556. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pombert JF, Lemieux C, Turmel M. The complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the green alga Oltmannsiellopsis viridis reveals a distinctive quadripartite architecture in the chloroplast genome of early diverging ulvophytes. BMC Biol. 2006;4:3. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pombert JF, Otis S, Lemieux C, Turmel M. The chloroplast genome sequence of the green alga Pseudendoclonium akinetum (Ulvophyceae) reveals unusual structural features and new insights into the branching order of chlorophyte lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;22:1903–1918. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 2000;16:276–277. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rumpho ME, Pelletreau KN, Moustafa A, Bhattacharya D. The making of a photosynthetic animal. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:303–311. doi: 10.1242/jeb.046540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rumpho ME, Summer EJ, Green BJ, Fox TC, Manhart JR. Mollusc/algal chloroplast symbiosis: how can isolated chloroplasts continue to function for months in the cytosol of a sea slug in the absence of an algal nucleus? Zoology. 2001;104:303–312. doi: 10.1078/0944-2006-00036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rumpho ME, et al. Horizontal gene transfer of the algal nuclear gene psbO to the photosynthetic sea slug Elysia chlorotica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17867–17871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804968105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sakamoto W, Zaltsman A, Admin Z, Takahashi Y. Coordinated regulation and complex formation of YELLOW VARIEGATED1 and YELLOW VARIEGATED2, chloroplastic FTSH metalloproteases involved in the repair cycle of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thylakoid membranes. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2843–2855. doi: 10.1105/tpc.017319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tatusov RL, et al. The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:22–28. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Trench RK, Boyle JE, Smith DC. The association between chloroplasts of Codium fragile and the mollusc Elysia viridis. II. Chloroplast ultrastructure and photosynthetic carbon fixation in E. viridis. Proc R Soc B. 1973;184:63–81. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tymms MJ, Schweiger HG. Tandemly repeated nonribosomal DNA sequences in the chloroplast genome of an Acetabularia mediterranea strain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:1706–1710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wägele H, et al. Transcriptomic evidence that longevity of acquired plastids in the photosynthetic slugs Elysia timida and Plakobranchus ocellatus does not entail lateral transfer of algal nuclear genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:699–706. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Watson JC, Surzycki SJ. Extensive sequence homology in the DNA coding for elongation factor Tu from Escherichia coli and the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79:2264–2267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.7.2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yao DCI, Brune DC, Vermaas WFJ. Lifetimes of photosystem I and II proteins in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang D, et al. The FtsH protease heterocomplex in Arabidopsis: dispensability of type-B protease activity for proper chloroplast development. Plant Cell. 2010;22:3710–3725. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.079202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data
supp_evt205_FigS1.pdf (160.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Genome Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES