Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1974 May;71(5):1670–1671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1670

Population Structure in Relation to Cost of Selection

Verne Grant 1,2, Robert H Flake 1,2
PMCID: PMC388299  PMID: 4525286

Abstract

The opposing requirements in an evolving population for a rapid rate of multiple gene substitution and for the maintenance of normal population size can be reconciled in a variety of ways. The ways out of the impasse suggested here invoke deviations from the usual assumption of a large continuous population with constant numbers. In a colonial population system there may be significant random fluctuations in the accidental mortality rate between different colonies; and those colonies with reduced numbers of accidental deaths could tolerate the larger number of selective deaths that go hand in hand with rapid evolution. In new daughter colonies founded by one or a few colonizing individuals from a large polymorphic ancestral population, some genes may reach complete fixation in one or a few generations, without the usual concomitant selective cost. Or, in the same setup, the favored alleles may change by chance from rare to moderately common, but not to complete fixation, during the founding of some daughter colonies; and this raises the allele frequencies above the low range, where the cost of selection is greatest, so that the cost of further selective changes is bearable.

Keywords: genetic load, substitutional load, gene substitution, evolutionary rate

Full text

PDF
1670

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kimura M., Crow J. F. Natural selection and gene substitution. Genet Res. 1969 Apr;13(2):127–141. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300002846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kimura M., Maruyama T. The substitutional load in a finite population. Heredity (Edinb) 1969 Feb;24(1):101–114. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1969.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. King J. L. Continuously distributed factors affecting fitness. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):483–492. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. King J. L. The gene interaction component of the genetic load. Genetics. 1966 Mar;53(3):403–413. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.3.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian Populations. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97–159. doi: 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES