Abstract
The cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) is involved in the metabolism of testosterone. Functional changes in this enzyme may influence endogenous hormone exposure, which has been associated with risk of breast cancer. To assess potential associations between two functional polymorphisms CYP2B6_516_G>T (rs3745274) and CYP2B6_785_A>G (rs2279343) and breast cancer risk we established a specific matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) assay. The GENICA breast cancer case-control study showed associations between the variant genotypes CYP2B6_516_TT and CYP2B6_785_GG and breast cancer risk with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.34 (p = 0.001) and 1.31 (p = 0.002), respectively. A similar effect was observed for carriers of the CYP2B6_516_T allele in a validation study including four independent studies from Germany, Sweden and USA. In a pooled analysis of all five studies involving 4,638 breast cancer cases and 3,594 controls of European ancestry, carriers of the CYP2B6_516_G and the CYP2B6_785_G variant had an increased breast cancer risk with ORs of 1.10 (p = 0.027) and 1.10 (p = 0.031), respectively. We conclude that the genetic variants CYP2B6_516_G and CYP2B6_785_G (designated CYP2B6*6), which are known to decrease activity of the CYP2B6 enzyme, contribute to an increased breast cancer risk.
Keywords: CYP2B6, polymorphism, testosterone, breast cancer risk
Introduction
Women with high serum and urinary concentrations of sex hormones have a significantly increased breast cancer risk.1-3 The steroid hormones estradiol and testosterone are independently associated with breast cancer risk with testosterone reported to confer a stronger influence on breast cancer risk than estradiol in postmenopausal women.2 There are two hypothetical ways for androgens to affect breast cancer risk, they can serve as an important source of estrogens being converted to estrogen in the breast,4 or can directly stimulate growth and division of breast cells.2 At the level of testosterone metabolism the cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) enzyme mediates the 16-alpha- and 16-beta-hydroxylation, a key step in the deactivation of this hormone.5 CYP2B6 contributes about 2% to 5% of the total liver CYP content but it exhibits about 300-fold variability of expression and has been suggested to increase with age.6 It is expressed in liver as well as in extra-hepatic tissues such as the breast, notably, levels of CYP2B6 vary between normal breast tissue and breast tumors, with higher levels in tumors.7,8 In line with the in vitro observation of the transcriptional regulation of CYP2B6 by the estrogen receptor (ER), ER positive breast tumors show higher CYP2B6 levels than ER negative tumors.9,10
The CYP2B6 gene and enzyme activity are highly polymorphic,6 raising the possibility that functional polymorphisms in this gene influence testosterone levels and breast cancer risk. Currently 29 distinct star alleles have been identified in CYP2B6, of which the *6 allele including two amino acid changes Gln172His (CYP2B6_516_G>T, rs3745274) and Lys262Arg (CYP2B6_785_A>G, rs2279343) is the most common at a frequency of 15% to 60% across populations and being associated with 50 to 75% decreased hepatic liver expression.6,11-13 However, CYP2B6 polymorphisms have not been among the loci recently associated with breast cancer susceptibility in genome-wide association studies (GWAS).14-16 Importantly, this may be in part explained by the absence of polymorphisms in gene regions with high sequence similarities to other genes or pseudo genes from GWAS arrays because specific genotyping requires an adapted primer design and amplification conditions.14 Thus, discrimination of CYP2B6 and CYP2B7 pseudogene genotypes requires unique low plex genotyping assays or small scale microarrays.17 Using this technical improvement and following the hypothesis that a genetically determined decreased CYP2B6 activity increases testosterone levels and consequently breast cancer risk, we performed a two-stage breast cancer association study by genotyping the CYP2B6_516_G>T and CYP2B6_785_A>G polymorphisms in the GENICA breast cancer-case control study. This was followed by validation in independent case-control study collections from Germany, Sweden and the USA and a pooled analysis. The study involving 4,638 breast cancer cases and 3,594 controls showed that CYP2B6*6 is associated with increased breast cancer risk.
Material and Methods
Study populations
Five breast cancer case-control study collections from Germany, Sweden and the USA were included in this two-stage association analysis comprising a total of 4,638 breast cancer cases and 3,594 controls of European descent.
The population-based GENICA (Gene Environment Interactions and Breast Cancer study) from Germany recruited breast cancer cases and age-matched control from the Greater Bonn Region, between 08/2000 and 9/2004. Cases and controls were eligible if they were of Caucasian ethnicity, current residents of the study region, and below 80 years of age. Cases were enrolled within six month of diagnosis. Controls were selected from population registries from 31 communities in the study regions.18,19 The German hospital-based BBCC (Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Controls) recruited women of European descent from 2002 to 2006. Invasive breast cancer cases were recruited at the University Breast Centre, Franconia in Northern Bavaria. Controls were invited by a newspaper advertisement in Northern Bavaria. Healthy women aged 55 or older with no diagnosis of cancer were enrolled.20 The HaBCS (Hannover Breast Cancer Study) from Germany recruited breast cancer cases from the Hannover Medical School between 1997 and 2003. Controls were collected randomly from the female blood bank donors at Hannover Medical School between 8/2005 and 12/2005. They were not age-matched but residing in the same geographic region.21 The population-based SASBAC (Singapore and Sweden Breast Cancer Study) from Sweden recruited patients and controls of European descent between 10/1993 and 03/1995. Incident cases were identified via the regional cancer registries in Sweden. Age-matched controls were randomly selected from the total population registry.22 The US hospital-based MCBCS (Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Study) recruited participants of European descent residing in 6 states (MN, WI, IA, IL, ND, SD) between 2002 and 2005. Incident breast cancer cases were enrolled within six month of diagnosis. Controls were recruited from women without a prior history of cancer visiting Mayo Clinic for general medical examination. Cases and controls were matched by age, ethnicity and state. 23
Genotyping
Blood-derived DNA samples of all breast cancer cases and controls were genotyped by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Due to sequences homologies resulting in more than one hit in the human genome in sequence alignment an automatic assay design was hampered for the CYP2B6_516_G>T and CYP2B6_785_A>G polymorphism. Therefore, specific primers were designed by eye inspection of the sequence. To enhance specific primer binding an adapted PCR program was used: 94°C for 2 min followed by 5 cycles with 95°C for 20 sec, 65°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 40 cycles with 95°C for 20 sec, 62°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 72°C for 10 min. MALDI-TOF MS analysis was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY platform and homogenous MassEXTEND methodology (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For all MALDI-TOF MS analyses, a Sequenom Compact MALDI-TOF MS was used for data acquisitions from the SpectroCHIP. Genotyping calls were made with MASSARRAY RT software v 3.0.0.4 (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). For quality control no template controls and positive controls with known genotypes were included. In addition, repeated analysis was performed for 20% randomly selected samples. Primers were synthesized by Metabion International AG, Martinsried, Germany. Primer sequences are available upon request.
Statistical analyses
Genotype frequencies of all polymorphisms were tested for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. Associations between CYP2B6 genotypes and over all breast cancer risk were analyzed by logistic regression adjusted for age and study using SPSS v 15.0. Risk estimates were given in odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Analysis for a potential association between genotypes and respective tumor steroid hormone receptor status was done for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. To improve the strength of the analysis we applied a multi-step analysis: First a pilot study was performed including the GENICA study only. In a next step a validation study was done comprising four independent study collections: BBCC, HABCS, MCBCS and SASBAC Finally, we performed a pooled analysis including all five studies.
Results
CYP2B6_516_G>T and CYP2B6_785_A>G were genotyped and call rates were >98%. Positive controls and repeated samples showed 100% congruency. No genotype call was observed in the negative controls. Genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and allele frequencies are in line with published data.24
Risk associations were observed for overall breast cancer risk for both CYP2B6 variants. At the CYP2B6_516 locus we observed a significant association between the TT genotype and breast cancer risk in the pilot study (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.12-1.59; p = 0.001). An association with breast cancer was also observed for carriers of the GT genotype (OR of 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.24; p = 0.020; Table 1) and the combined group of carriers of the GT and TT genotypes (OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.21; p = 0.042; Table 1) in the validation study. At the CYP2B6_785 locus we observed a significant risk effect for homozygous carriers of the G allele (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.10-1.57; p = 0.002). This association was not observed in the validation study.
Table 1.
Genotype frequencies and estimated risks of CYP2B6_516_G>T (rs3745274) and CYP2B6_785_A>G (rs2279343) in breast cancer cases and controls
Study | CYP2B6 Genotypes | Cases n(%) |
Controls n (%) |
ORa (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pilot study GENICA | 516_G>T | ||||
GG | 577 (56.7) | 590 (58.5) | 1.00b | ||
GT | 344 (33.8) | 363 (36.0) | 0.97 (0.80-1.17) | 0.741 | |
TT | 96 (9.5) | 55 (5.5) | 1.34 (1.12-1.59) | 0.001 | |
GT+TT | 440 | 418 | 1.08 (0.90-1.24) | 0.413 | |
785_A>G | |||||
AA | 577 (56.7) | 596 (59.1) | 1.00b | ||
AG | 347 (34.2) | 357 (35.4) | 1.00 (0.83-1.21) | 0.967 | |
GG | 92 (9.1) | 55 (5.5) | 1.31 (1.10-1.57) | 0.002 | |
AG+GG | 439 | 412 | 1.10 (0.92-1.31) | 0.287 | |
Validation study BBCC, HaBCS, MCBCS, SASBAC | 516_G>T | ||||
GG | 2631 (57.8) | 2132 (60.5) | 1.00b | ||
GT | 1660 (36.5) | 1177 (33.4) | 1.12 (1.02-1.24) | 0.020 | |
TT | 257 (5.7) | 215 (6.1) | 0.99 (0.90-1.10) | 0.886 | |
GT+TT | 1917 | 1392 | 1.10 (1.01-1.21) | 0.042 | |
785_A>G | |||||
AA | 2494 (57.2) | 1991 (59.2) | 1.00b | ||
AG | 1578 (36.2) | 1147 (34.1) | 1.09 (0.99-1.21) | 0.081 | |
GG | 290 (6.6) | 226 (6.7) | 1.03 (0.93-1.13) | 0.589 | |
AG+GG | 1868 | 1373 | 1.09 (0.99-1.19) | 0.086 | |
Pooled analysis BBCC, HaBCS, MCBCS, SASBAC and GENICA | 516_G>T | ||||
GG | 3208 (57.7) | 2722 (60.0) | 1.00b | ||
GT | 2004 (36.0) | 1540 (34.0) | 1.09 (1.00-1.19) | 0.048 | |
TT | 353 (6.3) | 270 (6.0) | 1.07 (0.98-1.16) | 0.143 | |
GT+TT | 2357 | 1810 | 1.10 (1.01-1.19) | 0.027 | |
785_A>G | |||||
AA | 3071 (57.1) | 2587 (59.2) | 1.00b | ||
AG | 1925 (35.8) | 1504 (34.4) | 1.08 (0.99-1.18) | 0.078 | |
GG | 382 (7.1) | 281 (6.4) | 1.09 (1.00-1.18) | 0.053 | |
AG+GG | 2307 | 1785 | 1.10 (1.01-1.19) | 0.031 |
OR adjusted for age and study
Reference
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio
The pooled analysis of all five study collections confirmed the association with breast cancer risk for both CYP2B6 variant loci. The heterozygous CYP2B6_516_GT carriers and the combined group of GT and TT carriers showed an increased breast cancer risk (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.19; p = 0.048; and OR of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.01-1.19 p = 0.027; Table 1). The association with breast cancer risk was also observed for carriers of the CYP2B6_785_G variant OR of 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.19; p = 0.031; Table 1). No significant associations with breast cancer risk were observed when cases were stratified by ER or PR status of breast tumors.
Discussion
In this work we successfully established specific MALDI-TOF MS genotyping assays for the genotyping of CYP2B6 variants located in genomic sequences with high homology. This enabled us to perform breast cancer risk association studies at CYP2B6*6 polymorphic loci known to modify CYP2B6 enzymatic activity. We observed an increased breast cancer risk associated with both variants constituting the CYP2B6*6 polymorphism, e.g. CYP2B6_516_T and CYP2B6_785_G alleles.
Although the increase in breast cancer risk has been observed at both loci, they were not consistent between pilot and validation studies, both with respect to genotype groups and effect size. However, it is important to note, that risk effects were similar at both loci for the total combined groups of carriers of the respective variant alleles, i.e. CYP2B6_516_GT and TT carriers or CYP2B6_785_AG and GG carriers, with OR 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.19), respectively. Because both alleles together constitute the CYP2B6*6 polymorphism this suggests for the first time a role of this polymorphism in breast cancer risk. The observed ORs are in the range of the so far established common low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci with ORs from 1.07 to 1.22 including polymorphisms in genes such as FGFR2 and TOX3. As of yet, this set of more than 20 known susceptibility loci accounts for about 8% of the heritability of breast cancer.16 Therefore, it will be of particular interest to evaluate CYP2B6*6 in concert with all known risk factors in large study collections to establish a more comprehensive breast cancer susceptibility panel.
The observed risk effect is in line with the current understanding of the role of CYP2B6 in steroid hormone metabolism.5 Decreased enzyme activity caused by CYP2B6_516_T and CYP2B6_785_G, designated CYP2B6*6, potentially increases steroid hormone levels, a known breast cancer risk factor.25 It is of note, that a similar steroid hormone-related carcinogenic effect of CYP2B6 has been shown for prostate cancer.26,27 Recently a report on an association between the CYP2B6_516_T variant and leukemia suggested that low CYP2B6 activity decreased degradation of carcinogenic xenobiotoc compounds which promotes tumor cell formation.28 Taking into consideration that CYP2B6 is one of the most polymorphic CYPs in humans but at the same time is one of the less well-studied CYP enzymes,6,29 our observation of a role in breast cancer risk together with the published literature highlights the need to overcome possible technical issues and further explore its role in cancer.
What’s new?
A multistage study of more than 8,000 breast cancer cases and controls suggested that the CYP2B6*6 allele, which influences CYP2B6 activity, is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. This finding adds CYP2B6 to the candidate genes for the evolving panel of known breast cancer susceptibility loci and implicates CYP2B6 in the mechanism by which steroid hormone levels influence breast cancer risk.
Acknowledgments
This work and the GENICA study was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and 01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, and the Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, Germany. The SASBAC study was supported by the Märit and Hans Rausing’s Initiative Against Breast Cancer, the National Institutes of Health (RO1 CA58427), the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR; Singapore), and the Swedish Research Council. J Li was a recipient of the A*STAR Graduate Scholarship. KH was supported by the Swedish Research Council (523-2006-972). KC was financed by the Swedish Cancer Society (5128-B07-01PAF). The BBCC study was supported by the ELAN program of the University Hospital Erlangen. The HaBCS study was supported by intramural funding from Hannover Medical School and by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation. The MCBCS study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 CA128978, a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in breast cancer (P50 CA116201), and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Footnotes
Competing interests
All authors disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations.
References
- 1.Eliassen AH, Missmer SA, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE. Endogenous steroid hormone concentrations and risk of breast cancer: does the association vary by a woman’s predicted breast cancer risk? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:1823–30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.7432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, et al. Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1218–26. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Onland-Moret NC, Kaaks R, Van Noord PA, et al. Urinary endogenous sex hormone levels and the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1394–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Poutanen M, Isomaa V, Peltoketo H, Vihko R. Role of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in endocrine and intracrine estradiol biosynthesis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;55:525–32. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Imaoka S, Yamada T, Hiroi T, et al. Multiple forms of human P450 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Systematic characterization and comparison with those of the rat. Biochem Pharmacol. 1996;51:1041–50. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(96)00052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zanger UM, Schwab M. Cytochrome P450 enzymes in drug metabolism: regulation of gene expression, enzyme activities, and impact of genetic variations. Pharmacol Ther. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007. in press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.El-Rayes BF, Ali S, Heilbrun LK, et al. Cytochrome p450 and glutathione transferase expression in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1705–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iscan M, Klaavuniemi T, Coban T, Kapucuoglu N, Pelkonen O, Raunio H. The expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in human breast tumours and normal breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001;70:47–54. doi: 10.1023/a:1012526406741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tozlu S, Girault I, Vacher S, et al. Identification of novel genes that co-cluster with estrogen receptor alpha in breast tumor biopsy specimens, using a large-scale real-time reverse transcription-PCR approach. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006;13:1109–20. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.01120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lo R, Burgoon L, Macpherson L, Ahmed S, Matthews J. Estrogen receptor-dependent regulation of CYP2B6 in human breast cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1799:469–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hofmann MH, Blievernicht JK, Klein K, et al. Aberrant splicing caused by single nucleotide polymorphism c.516G>T [Q172H], a marker of CYP2B6*6, is responsible for decreased expression and activity of CYP2B6 in liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;325:284–92. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.133306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lamba V, Lamba J, Yasuda K, et al. Hepatic CYP2B6 expression: gender and ethnic differences and relationship to CYP2B6 genotype and CAR (constitutive androstane receptor) expression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;307:906–22. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.054866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lang T, Klein K, Fischer J, et al. Extensive genetic polymorphism in the human CYP2B6 gene with impact on expression and function in human liver. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:399–415. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200107000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature. 2007;447:1087–93. doi: 10.1038/nature05887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lambrechts D, Truong T, Justenhoven C, et al. 11q13 is a susceptibility locus for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1123–32. doi: 10.1002/humu.22089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ghoussaini M, Fletcher O, Michailidou K, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies three new breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nat Genet. 2012;44:312–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Justenhoven C. Polymorphisms of phase I and phase II enzymes and breast cancer risk. Front Gene. 2012 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Justenhoven C, Pierl CB, Haas S, et al. The CYP1B1_1358_GG genotype is associated with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:171–7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9762-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pesch B, Ko Y, Brauch H, et al. Factors modifying the association between hormone-replacement therapy and breast cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20:699–711. doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-0032-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schrauder M, Frank S, Strissel PL, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism D1853N of the ATM gene may alter the risk for breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;134:873–82. doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0355-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dork T, Bendix R, Bremer M, et al. Spectrum of ATM gene mutations in a hospital-based series of unselected breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001;61:7608–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wedren S, Lovmar L, Humphreys K, et al. Oestrogen receptor alpha gene haplotype and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: a case control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6:R437–R449. doi: 10.1186/bcr811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Olson JE, Ma CX, Pelleymounter LL, et al. A comprehensive examination of CYP19 variation and breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:623–5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Turpeinen M, Zanger UM. Cytochrome P450 2B6: function, genetics, and clinical relevance. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2012;27:185–97. doi: 10.1515/dmdi-2012-0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Key TJ. Endogenous oestrogens and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Steroids. 2011;76:812–5. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumagai J, Fujimura T, Takahashi S, et al. Cytochrome P450 2B6 is a growth-inhibitory and prognostic factor for prostate cancer. Prostate. 2007;67:1029–37. doi: 10.1002/pros.20597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kurosaki T, Suzuki M, Enomoto Y, et al. Polymorphism of cytochrome P450 2B6 and prostate cancer risk: a significant association in a Japanese population. Int J Urol. 2009;16:364–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yuan ZH, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Liu HX, Zhao J, Zhu P. CYP2B6 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms and leukemia susceptibility. Ann Hematol. 2011;90:293–9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-1085-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zanger UM, Klein K, Saussele T, Blievernicht J, Hofmann MH, Schwab M. Polymorphic CYP2B6: molecular mechanisms and emerging clinical significance. Pharmacogenomics. 2007;8:743–59. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.7.743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]