Abstract
In the title salt, C8H12N+·NO3 −, the N atom of the 4-methylbenzylammonium cation is displaced by 1.366 (2) Å from the mean plane of the other atoms. In the crystal, the cations are connected to the anions by N—H⋯O and N—H⋯(O,O) hydrogen bonds, generating a layered network parallel to (100). A weak C—H⋯O interaction also occurs.
Related literature
For related structures, see: Kefi et al. (2011 ▶); Rahmouni et al. (2011 ▶). For a discussion on hydrogen bonding, see: Brown (1976 ▶); Blessing (1986 ▶). For aromatic π–π stacking interactions, see: Janiak (2000 ▶). For graph-set notation of hydrogen-bonding patterns, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶).
Experimental
Crystal data
C8H12N+·NO3 −
M r = 184.20
Monoclinic,
a = 15.097 (2) Å
b = 5.8121 (10) Å
c = 10.486 (2) Å
β = 99.75 (2)°
V = 906.8 (3) Å3
Z = 4
Ag Kα radiation
λ = 0.56083 Å
μ = 0.06 mm−1
T = 293 K
0.40 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm
Data collection
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer
6579 measured reflections
4430 independent reflections
2415 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R int = 0.033
2 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: 1%
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.071
wR(F 2) = 0.216
S = 0.96
4430 reflections
122 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3
Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▶).
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131Isup2.hkl
Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131Isup3.cml
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).
| D—H⋯A | D—H | H⋯A | D⋯A | D—H⋯A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1—H1A⋯O1i | 0.89 | 2.07 | 2.936 (3) | 164 |
| N1—H1A⋯O3i | 0.89 | 2.52 | 3.065 (2) | 120 |
| N1—H1B⋯O3ii | 0.89 | 2.12 | 2.9378 (19) | 153 |
| N1—H1C⋯O3 | 0.89 | 2.01 | 2.900 (2) | 179 |
| N1—H1C⋯O2 | 0.89 | 2.55 | 3.158 (3) | 126 |
| C8—H8A⋯O1iii | 0.97 | 2.45 | 3.234 (2) | 138 |
Symmetry codes: (i)
; (ii)
; (iii)
.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of HEScR.
supplementary crystallographic information
1. Comment
We report here the preparation and the crystal structure of the title compound, C8H12N·NO3 (I).
The asymmetric unit of (I) consists of one nitrate anion and one 4-methylbenzylammonium cation (Figure 1). The 4-methylbenzylammonium cations are connected to the nitrate anions through weak N—H···O and C—H···O hydrogen bonds with donor-acceptor distances varying between 2.900 (2) and 3.234 (2) Å [d (N(C)···O) > 2.73 Å] (Brown, 1976); (Blessing, 1986) (Table 1, Figure 2).
In the nitrate anion, the distance N2—O2 is significantly shorter than the N2—O1 and N2—O3 distances because O2 is applied in only one hydrogen bond (table1) while O1 and O3 are applied in two and three hydrogen bonds, respectively. These geometrical features have also been noticed in other crystal structures (Rahmouni, et al., 2011).
Each organic entity is bounded to three different nitrate anions through five N—H···O hydrogen bonds forming R12(4) and R42(8) motifs (Fig. 3) (Bernstein, et al., 1995). Examination of the 4-methylbenzylammonium cation shows that the bond distances and angles show no significant difference from those obtained in other structures involving the same organic groups (Kefi, et al., 2011). The aromatic ring of the organic cation is essentially planar with an r.m.s deviation of 0.0099 Å. The inter-planar distance between nearby phenyl rings is in the vicinity of 5.925 Å, which is much longer than 3.80 Å, value required for the formation of π–π interactions (Janiak, 2000).
The crystal cohesion and stability are ensured by electrostatic and van der Waals interactions which, together with N—H···O and C—H···O hydrogen bonds, build up a two-dimensional network.
2. Experimental
An aqueous solution containing 1 mmol of HNO3 in 10 ml of water, was added to 1 mmol of 4-xylylamine in 10 ml of ethanol. The obtained solution was stirred for 20 min and then left to stand at room temperature. Colorless prisms of the title compound were obtained after some days.
3. Refinement
All H atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.93 Å (aromatic) or 0.97 Å (methylene) or 0.96 Å (methyl), N—H = 0.89 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N).
Figures
Fig. 1.
An ORTEP view of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines.
Fig. 2.
Projection of (I) along the b axis. The H-atoms not involved in H-bonding are omitted.
Fig. 3.
Hydrogen bond motifs in (I).
Crystal data
| C8H12N+·NO3− | F(000) = 392 |
| Mr = 184.20 | Dx = 1.349 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/c | Ag Kα radiation, λ = 0.56083 Å |
| Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
| a = 15.097 (2) Å | θ = 9–11° |
| b = 5.8121 (10) Å | µ = 0.06 mm−1 |
| c = 10.486 (2) Å | T = 293 K |
| β = 99.75 (2)° | Prism, colorless |
| V = 906.8 (3) Å3 | 0.40 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm |
| Z = 4 |
Data collection
| Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer | Rint = 0.033 |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | θmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.2° |
| Graphite monochromator | h = −2→25 |
| non–profiled ω scans | k = −9→2 |
| 6579 measured reflections | l = −17→17 |
| 4430 independent reflections | 2 standard reflections every 120 min |
| 2415 reflections with I > 2σ(I) | intensity decay: 1% |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.071 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.216 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 0.96 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0879P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 4430 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.011 |
| 122 parameters | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 |
Special details
| Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| O3 | 0.42764 (9) | 0.7571 (2) | 0.58898 (11) | 0.0491 (4) | |
| N2 | 0.40982 (10) | 0.7432 (3) | 0.70119 (15) | 0.0495 (4) | |
| N1 | 0.40818 (11) | 1.2425 (3) | 0.52659 (18) | 0.0576 (5) | |
| H1A | 0.4136 | 1.3250 | 0.5990 | 0.086* | |
| H1B | 0.4500 | 1.2859 | 0.4811 | 0.086* | |
| H1C | 0.4151 | 1.0940 | 0.5464 | 0.086* | |
| C6 | 0.20891 (13) | 1.2197 (3) | 0.60241 (18) | 0.0485 (5) | |
| H6 | 0.2267 | 1.3600 | 0.6411 | 0.058* | |
| C2 | 0.11570 (12) | 0.8824 (3) | 0.59300 (17) | 0.0455 (5) | |
| C7 | 0.14446 (13) | 1.0904 (4) | 0.64823 (18) | 0.0510 (5) | |
| H7 | 0.1198 | 1.1447 | 0.7180 | 0.061* | |
| C5 | 0.24736 (12) | 1.1432 (3) | 0.49952 (16) | 0.0420 (4) | |
| C4 | 0.21981 (13) | 0.9329 (3) | 0.44485 (18) | 0.0494 (5) | |
| H4 | 0.2453 | 0.8768 | 0.3763 | 0.059* | |
| C8 | 0.31895 (14) | 1.2799 (4) | 0.44969 (19) | 0.0538 (5) | |
| H8A | 0.3200 | 1.2369 | 0.3606 | 0.065* | |
| H8B | 0.3042 | 1.4423 | 0.4511 | 0.065* | |
| C3 | 0.15502 (13) | 0.8059 (3) | 0.49093 (19) | 0.0517 (5) | |
| H3 | 0.1373 | 0.6654 | 0.4525 | 0.062* | |
| O1 | 0.39214 (12) | 0.5519 (3) | 0.74280 (15) | 0.0818 (6) | |
| O2 | 0.41003 (13) | 0.9155 (3) | 0.76752 (16) | 0.0859 (6) | |
| C1 | 0.04360 (14) | 0.7443 (4) | 0.6414 (2) | 0.0632 (6) | |
| H1D | 0.0477 | 0.7676 | 0.7329 | 0.095* | |
| H1E | 0.0516 | 0.5840 | 0.6244 | 0.095* | |
| H1F | −0.0144 | 0.7933 | 0.5977 | 0.095* |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| O3 | 0.0556 (8) | 0.0473 (8) | 0.0478 (7) | 0.0014 (6) | 0.0184 (6) | 0.0008 (6) |
| N2 | 0.0483 (9) | 0.0536 (10) | 0.0499 (9) | 0.0024 (8) | 0.0175 (7) | −0.0024 (8) |
| N1 | 0.0558 (10) | 0.0390 (9) | 0.0870 (12) | −0.0007 (8) | 0.0379 (9) | 0.0063 (9) |
| C6 | 0.0555 (11) | 0.0418 (10) | 0.0504 (10) | −0.0018 (9) | 0.0157 (9) | −0.0056 (9) |
| C2 | 0.0400 (9) | 0.0471 (11) | 0.0494 (10) | 0.0003 (9) | 0.0073 (8) | 0.0096 (9) |
| C7 | 0.0523 (11) | 0.0537 (12) | 0.0506 (10) | 0.0038 (10) | 0.0197 (9) | −0.0026 (9) |
| C5 | 0.0471 (10) | 0.0377 (9) | 0.0428 (9) | −0.0005 (9) | 0.0117 (8) | 0.0029 (8) |
| C4 | 0.0628 (12) | 0.0432 (11) | 0.0459 (10) | 0.0024 (10) | 0.0195 (9) | −0.0029 (8) |
| C8 | 0.0662 (13) | 0.0471 (12) | 0.0531 (10) | −0.0053 (10) | 0.0245 (10) | 0.0021 (9) |
| C3 | 0.0607 (12) | 0.0409 (11) | 0.0541 (11) | −0.0055 (9) | 0.0116 (10) | −0.0006 (9) |
| O1 | 0.1100 (14) | 0.0670 (11) | 0.0772 (11) | −0.0136 (10) | 0.0413 (10) | 0.0139 (9) |
| O2 | 0.1169 (15) | 0.0737 (12) | 0.0739 (10) | 0.0027 (11) | 0.0353 (10) | −0.0280 (9) |
| C1 | 0.0542 (12) | 0.0675 (15) | 0.0705 (13) | −0.0100 (11) | 0.0178 (11) | 0.0083 (12) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
| O3—N2 | 1.2533 (19) | C2—C1 | 1.508 (3) |
| N2—O2 | 1.219 (2) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
| N2—O1 | 1.240 (2) | C5—C4 | 1.384 (3) |
| N1—C8 | 1.464 (3) | C5—C8 | 1.505 (2) |
| N1—H1A | 0.8900 | C4—C3 | 1.376 (3) |
| N1—H1B | 0.8900 | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
| N1—H1C | 0.8900 | C8—H8A | 0.9700 |
| C6—C7 | 1.379 (3) | C8—H8B | 0.9700 |
| C6—C5 | 1.383 (2) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
| C6—H6 | 0.9300 | C1—H1D | 0.9600 |
| C2—C7 | 1.378 (3) | C1—H1E | 0.9600 |
| C2—C3 | 1.382 (3) | C1—H1F | 0.9600 |
| O2—N2—O1 | 121.05 (17) | C4—C5—C8 | 120.39 (16) |
| O2—N2—O3 | 120.18 (18) | C3—C4—C5 | 120.63 (17) |
| O1—N2—O3 | 118.77 (17) | C3—C4—H4 | 119.7 |
| C8—N1—H1A | 109.5 | C5—C4—H4 | 119.7 |
| C8—N1—H1B | 109.5 | N1—C8—C5 | 112.22 (16) |
| H1A—N1—H1B | 109.5 | N1—C8—H8A | 109.2 |
| C8—N1—H1C | 109.5 | C5—C8—H8A | 109.2 |
| H1A—N1—H1C | 109.5 | N1—C8—H8B | 109.2 |
| H1B—N1—H1C | 109.5 | C5—C8—H8B | 109.2 |
| C7—C6—C5 | 120.72 (18) | H8A—C8—H8B | 107.9 |
| C7—C6—H6 | 119.6 | C4—C3—C2 | 121.56 (19) |
| C5—C6—H6 | 119.6 | C4—C3—H3 | 119.2 |
| C7—C2—C3 | 117.47 (17) | C2—C3—H3 | 119.2 |
| C7—C2—C1 | 121.30 (18) | C2—C1—H1D | 109.5 |
| C3—C2—C1 | 121.2 (2) | C2—C1—H1E | 109.5 |
| C2—C7—C6 | 121.50 (18) | H1D—C1—H1E | 109.5 |
| C2—C7—H7 | 119.3 | C2—C1—H1F | 109.5 |
| C6—C7—H7 | 119.3 | H1D—C1—H1F | 109.5 |
| C6—C5—C4 | 118.11 (17) | H1E—C1—H1F | 109.5 |
| C6—C5—C8 | 121.48 (17) |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N1—H1A···O1i | 0.89 | 2.07 | 2.936 (3) | 164 |
| N1—H1A···O3i | 0.89 | 2.52 | 3.065 (2) | 120 |
| N1—H1B···O3ii | 0.89 | 2.12 | 2.9378 (19) | 153 |
| N1—H1C···O3 | 0.89 | 2.01 | 2.900 (2) | 179 |
| N1—H1C···O2 | 0.89 | 2.55 | 3.158 (3) | 126 |
| C8—H8A···O1iii | 0.97 | 2.45 | 3.234 (2) | 138 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+1; (iii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.
Footnotes
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB7131).
References
- Bernstein, J., David, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
- Blessing, R. H. (1986). Acta Cryst. B42, 613–621.
- Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
- Brown, I. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 24–31.
- Enraf–Nonius (1994). CAD-4 EXPRESS Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.
- Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
- Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
- Janiak, J. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3885–3896.
- Kefi, R., Jeanneau, E., Lefebvre, F. & Ben Nasr, C. (2011). Acta Cryst. C67, m126–m129. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Rahmouni, H., Smirani Sta, W., Al-Deyab, S. S. & Rzaigui, M. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o2334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131Isup2.hkl
Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022836/hb7131Isup3.cml
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report



