In the Historical Neurology article “The history of cerebral PET scanning: From physiology to cutting-edge technology” by L.H. Portnow et al. (Neurology® 2013;80:952–956), there is an error on page 954. When describing the half-life of FDG compared with [14C]DG, the authors should have used “shorter half-life” instead of “longer half-life.” The authors regret the error.