Skip to main content
Journal of Nephropathology logoLink to Journal of Nephropathology
editorial
. 2013 Jan 1;2(1):4–5. doi: 10.5812/nephropathol.8966

Prediction of diabetic nephropathy: The need for a sweet biomarker

Ramin Tolouian 1,*, German T Hernandez 1
PMCID: PMC3886181  PMID: 24475420

Diabetes is the leading cause of end stage renal disease, adult-onset blindness, and non-traumatic lower limb amputations. However, there is great variability among patients in the location, severity, and timing of the onset of diabetic complications. For example, one individual with uncontrolled diabetes for more than 30 years may have a mild degree of complications, while another individual with a 10 year history of diabetes may be blind and dialysis-dependent. Current guidelines recommend controlling blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid levels, smoking cessation, and administration of antiplatelet agents in order to delay the progression of diabetes complications. Annual testing of serum creatinine and urine albumin excretion is recommended to screen for nephropathy (3). However, beyond recommendations for screening and treatment, there is no practical method to predict which patients who develop complications will have a progressive course to end points such as end-stage kidney disease.

Glomerular mesangial expansion, thickening of the basement membranes as well as glomerular sclerosis are considered the hallmark pathologic changes in diabetic kidney disease (4). Although the structural changes in diabetic nephropathy may be the same but the clinical manifestations of diabetic kidney disease may not be similar for different patients. We currently treat all diabetic patients with the same strategies, although we are aware that their individual response and risk of renal progression may be different. Currently, there are no reliable biomarkers available that can predict a more progressive course in patients with diabetic nephropathy. In theory and in practice, it would be extremely useful to have a biomarker that can predict a more rapid decline in renal function among diabetic patients. Several clinical, genetic, and cellular markers have been proposed and tested for predicting the development of diabetic nephropathy in the past decade (5). The majority of the markers used in clinical practice, such as microalbuminuria, turn out to be markers of diabetic nephropathy rather than being predictors of its progression (6).

The ability to identify diabetic patients at high risk for progressive renal decline should be one of the priorities of the nephrology community. Early identification may lead to improved clinical management, quality of life, and a decrease in the already high burden of morbidity. An ideal biomarker should be relatively inexpensive and readily measured either in serum or urine. Our task is far from being completed.

Conflict of interest

The author declared no competing interests.

Funding/Support

None declared.

Acknowledgments

None declared.

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:

The ability to identify diabetic patients at high risk for progressive renal decline should be one of the priorities of nephrology community. Early identification may lead to improved clinical management, quality of life, and a decrease in the already high burden of morbidity. An ideal biomarker should be relatively inexpensive and readily measured either in serum or urine.

Please cite this paper as: Tolouian R, Hernandez GT. Prediction of Diabetic Nephropathy: The need for a sweet biomarker. J Nephropathology. 2013; 2(1): 4-5. DOI: 10.5812/nephropathol.8966

References

  • 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta; 2011.
  • 2.Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, Quick WW, Yang WG, Fogli J. The Economic Burden Of Diabetes. Health Affairs . 2010;29:297–303. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care 2012;35:S11-S63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Tervaert TW, Mooyaart AL, Amann K, Cohen AH, Cook HT, Drachenberg CB. et al. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol . 2010;21(4):556–63. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010010010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Batlle D. Clinical and cellular markers of diabetic nephropathy. Kidney international . 2003;63:2319–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00053.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caramori ML, Fioretto P, Mauer M. The need for early predictors of diabetic nephropathy risk: is albumin excretion rate sufficient? Diabetes . 2000;49:1399–408. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.9.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Nephropathology are provided here courtesy of Society of Diabetic Nephropathy

RESOURCES