Abstract
Secreted PCSK9 binds to cell surface LDL receptor (LDLR) and directs the receptor for lysosomal degradation. PCSK9 is potent at inducing LDLR degradation in cultured liver-derived cells, but it is considerably less active in immortalized fibroblasts. We examined PCSK9 trafficking in SV-589 human skin fibroblasts incubated with purified recombinant wild-type PCSK9 or gain-of-function mutant PCSK9-D374Y with increased LDLR binding affinity. Despite LDLR-dependent PCSK9 uptake, cell surface LDLR levels in SV-589 fibroblasts were only modestly reduced by wild-type PCSK9, even at high nonphysiological concentrations (20 µg/ml). Internalized 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 underwent lysosomal degradation at high levels, indicating its dissociation from recycling LDLRs. PCSK9-D374Y (2 µg/ml) reduced cell surface LDLRs by approximately 50%, but this effect was still blunted compared with HepG2 hepatoma cells. Radioiodinated PCSK9-D374Y was degraded less efficiently in SV-589 fibroblasts, and Alexa488-labeled PCSK9-D374Y trafficked to both lysosomes and endocytic recycling compartments. Endocytic recycling assays showed that more than 50% of internalized PCSK9-D374Y recycled to the cell surface compared with less than 10% for wild-type PCSK9. These data support that wild-type PCSK9 readily dissociates from the LDLR within early endosomes of SV-589 fibroblasts, contributing to PCSK9-resistance. Although a large proportion of gain-of-function PCSK9-D374Y remains bound to LDLR in these cells, degradative activity is still diminished.
Keywords: endosome, degradation, ligand dissociation
The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) binds with high affinity to the apolipoprotein (apo)B100 and apoE components of circulating LDL and VLDL, respectively, via a ligand-binding domain consisting of seven cysteine-rich repeats (R1–R7) (1). Following LDLR-mediated endocytosis, bound lipoproteins are released within the acidic environment of early endosomes and the LDLR recycles to the cell surface. Lipoprotein release and LDLR recycling are facilitated by a pH-dependent open (ligand-active) to closed (ligand-inactive) conformational switch involving an intramolecular interaction between the R4/R5 repeats of the ligand-binding domain and a β-propeller region in the epidermal growth factor (EGF) precursor homology domain of LDLR (2, 3). LDLR-mediated uptake of LDL in the liver is the primary means of plasma LDL clearance and thus influences steady-state plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and associated risk of coronary artery disease (4).
LDLR also binds proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9), a secreted member of the mammalian proprotein convertase family of serine endoproteases (5–7). Bound PCSK9 disrupts the normal endocytic recycling itinerary of the LDLR and directs the receptor for degradation in endolysosomal compartments (8–11). PCSK9 binds in a Ca2+-dependent manner to the first of three Ca2+-binding EGF-like repeats (EGF-A) in the EGF precursor homology domain of LDLR and demonstrates increased binding affinity at acidic pH (9, 12, 13). Gain-of-function mutations in PCSK9 are associated with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (14, 15), with the missense D374Y variant causing a particularly severe form of the disease (16). The D374Y substitution in the catalytic domain of PCSK9 improves a key bonding interaction with H306 in the LDLR EGF-A domain resulting in 10- to 25-fold increased binding affinity at both neutral and acidic pH (17–19). Loss-of-function mutations in PCSK9 are relatively common among certain ethnic groups and are associated with lowered plasma LDL-C and significant protection from coronary artery disease (20, 21). Antagonism of circulating PCSK9 using injectable anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies that disrupt binding to LDLR resulted in substantial LDL-C lowering in Phase II clinical trials (22–24), supporting that secreted PCSK9 is a main regulator of circulating LDL-C levels in humans.
PCSK9 is primarily expressed and secreted from liver, with lower levels of expression in kidney, intestine and brain (25). PCSK9 is initially synthesized as a soluble 74 kDa precursor that undergoes autocatalytic cleavage in the ER lumen, releasing an approximately 14 kDa prodomain segment, which noncovalently associates with the approximately 60 kDa catalytic/C-terminal domains of PCSK9 and acts as a folding chaperone and inhibitor of inherent protease activity (8). The prodomain remains tightly bound within the catalytic pocket and as a consequence mature secreted PCSK9 is catalytically inert (12, 13). Catalytic activity is not required for PCSK9 to direct LDLR degradation in hepatic cells in culture or in mouse liver (26, 27). While the precise mechanism remains undefined, it is theorized that PCSK9 binding to the EGF-A domain inhibits the acid-dependent open-to-closed conformational switch of the LDLR in early endosomes, making the receptor more prone to lysosomal sorting mechanisms or proteolytic attack (28–30). In addition to the established binding interface between the PCSK9 catalytic domain and LDLR EGF-A domain, deletion mutagenesis and cellular LDLR degradation studies have revealed requirements for the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 and at least three LDLR ligand binding repeats, suggesting the involvement of these domain regions in structural aspects of LDLR degradation or additional protein-protein interactions (28, 31–34).
Although highly active in liver-derived cells in culture, exogenous PCSK9 is much less potent at directing LDLR degradation in immortalized fibroblasts, despite internalization along with LDLRs into endosomal compartments (5, 35). To explore mechanisms of intracellular PCSK9 resistance, we examined LDLR-dependent uptake and trafficking of PCSK9 in SV-589 cells, a line of SV40-transformed human skin fibroblasts shown to be highly resistant to PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation (35).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
We obtained fetal bovine serum (FBS), newborn calf serum, human transferrin and Lipofectamine 2000 from Life Technologies. E64 (N-[N-(L-3-trans-carboxyoxirane-2-carbonyl)-L-leucyl]agmatine) and EDTA-free CompleteTM Protease Inhibitor Tablets were obtained from Roche. PureProteomeTM Streptavidin Magnetic Beads from Millipore. IRDye800CW Streptavidin was from LI-COR Biosciences. Na 125I was from PerkinElmer. Cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol were purchased from Steroloids, and all other chemicals and reagents from Sigma unless otherwise specified. LDLR cDNA expression vector was pLDLR17 (36). Sodium mevalonate was prepared from mevalonic acid as described (37). Newborn calf lipoprotein-deficient serum (NCLPDS) (d > 1.215 g/ml) was prepared by ultracentrifugation (38).
Antibodies
rabbit anti-serum 3143 against the C-terminal 14 amino acids of the LDLR was the kind gift of J. Herz (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX); C7 antibody was purified from conditioned medium of mouse hybridoma cells (ATCC, CRL-1691) by protein A affinity chromatography using ProfiniaTM affinity chromatography purification system (Bio-Rad); mouse anti-human transferrin receptor antibody was purchased from Life Technologies; monoclonal anti-FLAG M2 antibody were from Sigma-Aldrich. Secondary IRDye-labeled goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG antibodies were from LI-COR Biosciences.
Protein purification and labeling
FLAG epitope-tagged recombinant human wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y were purified as previously described (39). PCSK9 was labeled with the AlexaFluor488 Protein Labeling Kit (Life Technologies) as per manufacturer's protocol followed by gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) to remove unbound dye. PCSK9 was labeled with EZ-LinkTM Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin (Thermo Scientific Pierce) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Free biotin was quenched in Tris-glycine buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 192 mM Glycine) and removed from biotinylated PCSK9 by gel filtration.
Radiolabeling of proteins
Purified wild-type PCSK9, PCSK9-D374Y or C7 monoclonal antibody [400 µg in 200 µl Hepes-buffered saline containing 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4 (HBS-C)] were incubated with carrier-free Na 125I (2 mCi) in Precoated Iodination Tubes (Thermo Scientific Pierce) for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by removal to a glass test tube and brought to a 500 µl volume in scavenging buffer (HBS-C containing 1 mM NaI carrier and 2 mg/ml tyrosine) and incubated 5 min. Free 125I and scavenged 125I were removed from iodinated proteins by gel filtration on a PD10 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in HBS-C. Integrity of iodinated proteins was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography of dried gels. Radiolabeled proteins were stored at 4°C and used within two weeks.
Cultured cell experiments
SV-589 human skin fibroblast cells (kindly provided by J. Goldstein, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) and HepG2 human hepatoma cells (ATCC, HB-8065) were maintained in monolayer culture at 37°C and 5% CO2 (SV-589) or 8.8% CO2 (HepG2). The base medium was DMEM (Gibco-Life Technologies) containing 4.5 g/L glucose for SV-589 cells or DMEM containing 1 g/L glucose for HepG2 cells. Medium A contained DMEM supplemented 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate; Medium B contained Medium A supplemented with 10% FBS (v/v); sterol-depleting Medium C contained Medium A supplemented with 5% (v/v) NCLPDS, 10 µM pravastatin, and 50 µM sodium mevalonate; sterol-supplemented Medium D contained Medium A with 5% (v/v) NCLPDS, 10 µg/ml cholesterol, and 1 µg/ml 25-hydroxycholesterol. Cells were plated and grown in Medium B to approximately 60% confluency prior to start of experiments.
Cell surface biotinylation and immunoblotting
SV-589 and HepG2 cells were cultured overnight in sterol-depleting or sterol-supplemented media conditions prior to treatment with PCSK9 (see figure legends for details). Following treatments, cells were scraped and collected in PBS and whole-cell extracts were prepared in Tris lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4; 150 mM NaCl; 1% Nonidet P-40 (EMD Biosciences); 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 5 mM EDTA; 5 mM EGTA; CompleteTM protease inhibitor cocktail; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)]. For some experiments, cell surface proteins were biotinylated prior to harvesting using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin (Thermo Scientific Pierce) as described (5). Three quarters of each cell lysate were brought up to 0.5 ml in Tris lysis buffer and rotated overnight at 4°C with streptavidin magnetic beads. The beads were washed three times with Tris-lysis buffer and protein eluted in 1× SDS loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 1% SDS; 5% glycerol; 10 mM EDTA; 0.0032% bromophenol blue). Precipitated cell surface protein and whole-cell extract proteins were subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) and incubated with primary antibodies. Infrared dye (IRDye-800)-labeled secondary antibodies were used for detection on LI-COR Odyssey infrared system (LI-COR Biosciences). Band intensity was analyzed using Odyssey 2.0 software.
Flow cytometry
SV-589 and HepG2 cells were cultured overnight in sterol-depleting Medium C, respectively, containing 150 µM E64, a noncell-permeable version of a cysteine protease inhibitor shown to inhibit lysosomal degradation of internalized PCSK9 in cultured cells (35). Following 1 h incubation with Alexa488-labeled PCSK9-D374Y (1 μg/ml), cells were washed with stripping buffer (100 mM Na 2-mercapto-ethanesulfonate; 50 mM Tris, pH 8.6; 100 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 0.2% BSA) to remove cell surface-associated fluorescence. Harvested cells were filtered through a 70 μM cell strainer (BD Biosciences) and subjected to flow cytometry using a BD FACSAria flow cytometer and cell sorter (BD Biosicences). The lower threshold of positive staining was determined using cells not incubated with fluorescent protein.
125I-PCSK9 degradation assay
SV-589 and HepG2 cells were cultured overnight in sterol-depleting Medium C, respectively, prior to pulse-labeling with 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 (5 µg/ml), PCSK9-D374Y (0.5 µg/ml), or C7 antibody (0.5 µg/ml) for 1 h in Medium A containing 5% NCLPDS. In control experiments, cells were pretreated for 30 min and then throughout with 50 µM chloroquine to inhibit lysosomal degradation. Following labeling, cells were washed and incubated in label-free Medium A with 5% NCLPDS for 6 h at 37°C. Medium was collected and total protein was precipitated on ice with 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and pelleted by centrifugation. TCA-soluble supernatant (1 ml) was removed to glass tubes, and mixed with 10 μl of 40% KI followed by 40 μl of 30% hydrogen peroxide. Reactions were allowed to stand for 10 min then extracted with 2 ml of chloroform to remove free iodide. A 700 μl of the upper aqueous phase containing 125I-monoiodotyrosine was removed for γ counting using a CobraTM II Auto-Gamma counter. Measurements were normalized to cell protein levels determined by BCA assay.
Live cell imaging and colocalization
SV-589 cells were cultured on Lab-Tek (Nunc) 8-well chambered coverglass and incubated overnight in sterol-depleting Medium C containing 150 μM E64. For colocalization of Alexa488-labeled PCSK9 with LysoTracker Red DND-99 (Life Technologies) cells were labeled with Alexa488-labeled wild-type PCSK9 (30 µg/ml) or D347Y PCSK9 (5 µg/ml) for 1 h and chased for up to 6 h in label-free Medium C containing E64. LysoTracker Red DND-99 was incubated at a concentration 200 nM for 2 h prior to the end of each chase period. For colocalization studies of Alexa488-labeled PCSK9 and Alexa647-labeled transferrin, cells were preincubated for a minimum 1 h in serum-free Medium A to deplete endogenous transferrin. Cells were then incubated with Alexa488-labeled wild-type PCSK9 (30 µg/ml) or PCSK9-D347Y (5 µg/ml), and Alexa647-labeled transferrin (100 µg/ml) for 1 h in Medium A. The labeled proteins were chased for 2 h in label-free Medium A containing E64, then visualized directly. Images were taken on an Olympus FV1000 scanning confocal microscope. Colocalization was quantified using Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Endocytic recycling assay
SV589 cells seeded in 24-well plates were cultured overnight in Medium C containing 150 μM E64. PCSK9 labeled with thiol-cleavable biotin was incubated with IRDye800CW-labeled streptavidin for 1 h at 37°C, and the complexes were then added to the cells. After 1 h, the cells were incubated with 20 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) in buffer B (PBS, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5% BSA (w/v)) for 20 min at 4°C, then washed twice for 10 min with 5 mg/ml iodoacetamide in buffer B. The cells were washed again with buffer B and PBS-CM (PBS, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2), then incubated in Medium A, supplemented with TCEP and E64, for 6 h at 37°C. The plate was directly scanned on the LI-COR Odyssey infrared system at time intervals. Signal intensity was quantified using Odyssey 2.0 software, background fluorescence of untreated wells was subtracted, and signal normalized to DNA levels stained by DRAQ5 emitting at a separate wavelength (Cedarlane Laboratories, Canada) (1:10,000).
Ligand blotting
HEK293 cells cultured in Medium B were transiently transfected with pLDLR17 vector using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies). After 48 h cells were scraped and pelleted in cold PBS then resuspended on ice in sorbitol microsome buffer (50 mm HEPES-KOH, pH 7.2, 250 mm sorbitol, 10 mm KCl, 1.5 mm MgCl2, CompleteTM protease inhibitor mixture, 1 mm PMSF) and disrupted with 10 passages through a 23-gauge needle. Membranes were pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min then resuspended in pH 6/Triton X-100 buffer (40 mm Tris-maleate, pH 6.0, 100 mm NaCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, CompleteTM protease inhibitor mixture, 1 mm PMSF). Membrane proteins (35 μg/lane) were resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE in nonreducing loading buffer (50 mM Tris-maleate, pH 6.0, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.5% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.05% bromophenol blue) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes was cut in strips and blocked for 30 min in blocking buffer (50 mm Tris-Cl, pH 7.0, 90 mm NaCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 5% (w/v) skim milk), then incubated in blocking buffer with 125I labeled wild-type PCSK9-FLAG (10 µg/ml) or PCSK9-D374Y (2 µg/ml) in the absence or presence of 50 µg/ml of unlabeled PCSK9-D374Y. Membranes were washed three times in blocking buffer and visualized on a Storm 860 Molecular Imager (GE Healthcare).
Statistical analysis
All presented values are mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was determined by Student t-test with GraphPad Prism 5 software.
RESULTS
Limited degradation of LDLRs in SV-589 fibroblasts in response to high PCSK9 concentrations
PCSK9 concentrations in human plasma range from 0.05 to 3 μg/ml among healthy individuals (40). A recent study showed that SV-589 cells, a line of SV40-transformed human skin fibroblasts, showed no decrease in LDLR levels in response to a 4 h treatment with 10 μg/ml concentration of purified PCSK9, whereas this same treatment decreased LDLR levels in HuH7 hepatoma cells and primary human fibroblasts (35). To further assess the extent of PCSK9 resistance in SV-589 fibroblasts, we incubated cells with purified recombinant wild-type PCSK9 at high nonphysiological concentrations (5–20 µg/ml) or with a lower concentration (2 µg/ml) of a gain-of-function PCSK9 variant (PCSK9-D374Y) that has increased LDLR affinity. As a comparison, HepG2 hepatoma cells were treated under identical conditions. Cells were first cultured for more than 16 h in lipoprotein-deficient medium containing a statin (pravastatin) to induce LDLR mRNA and protein expression. This culture condition also induced endogenous PCSK9 expression and secretion in both cell-lines (data not shown). To eliminate possible interference by secreted endogenous PCSK9, culture medium was replaced immediately prior to 6 h incubation with FLAG-tagged wild-type PCSK9 or PCSK9-D374Y. Cells were harvested and immunoblot analysis was performed to determine PCSK9 and LDLR levels present in whole cell extracts and among cell surface proteins isolated following cell surface biotinylation. As expected, treatment with PCSK9 greatly reduced cell surface LDLR expression in HepG2 hepatoma cells, whereas SV-589 cells remained highly resistant to LDLR degradation, despite similar levels of cell-association of FLAG-tagged PCSK9 (Fig. 1A). While there was a trend toward dose-dependent reduction of SV-589 cell surface LDLR in response to high concentrations of wild-type PCSK9, this effect only reached statistical significance at the highest PCSK9 concentration tested (20 µg/ml), which reduced cell surface LDLR levels by approximately 25% (Fig. 1B). We obtained similar results following longer 18 h incubations with PCSK9 (data not shown), ruling out the possibility that resistance to PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation observed in SV-589 fibroblasts was due to slower rates of cell surface LDLR endocytosis compared with HepG2 cells. Gain-of-function PCSK9-D374Y at a concentration of 2 µg/ml significantly reduced LDLR levels on the cell surface (>50%) in SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 1B), although this response was still much weaker than that seen in HepG2 cells. Thus, immortalized SV589 fibroblasts do not display absolute resistance to PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation and are susceptible to moderately elevated concentrations of the gain-of-function mutant PCSK9-D374Y.
Sterol-dependent uptake of PCSK9 in SV-589 fibroblasts
High cellular levels of sterols specifically suppress transcription of genes containing sterol-regulatory elements within their promoter regions, including LDLR, due to decreased proteolytic processing of the SREBP-2 transcription factor to its active form (1). Therefore, to assess whether PCSK9 cell-association and uptake was mediated by the LDLR in SV-589 fibroblasts we cultured SV-589 cells for more than 16 h in either sterol-depleting conditions (lipoprotein-deficient medium containing pravastatin) to induce LDLR mRNA and protein expression or medium supplemented with sterols (cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol) to suppress LDLR expression. Cells were then incubated with FLAG-tagged wild-type PCSK9 (5 µg/ml) or PCSK9-D374Y (0.5 µg/ml) for 2 h to allow cell-association and uptake. Wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y were detected in blots of whole cell extracts derived from cells cultured under LDLR-inducing conditions whereas cell-associated PCSK9 was decreased to almost undetectable levels for cells cultured with sterols, mirroring the suppression of LDLR protein levels (Fig. 2A). To further quantify this effect, we also performed FACS analysis to assess sterol-dependent cell-association and uptake of Alexa488-labeled PCSK9-D374Y in SV-589 fibroblasts as well as HepG2 cells. Cell-associated fluorescence was decreased over 90% for both cell-lines cultured in the presence of sterols (Fig. 2B).
Wild-type PCSK9 and mutant PCSK9-D374Y traffic to lysosomes in SV-589 fibroblasts
To examine the fate of PCSK9 in SV-589 fibroblasts, we measured lysosomal degradation of internalized 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y. For comparison purposes, we performed the same experiments in HepG2 cells, which have previously been shown to degrade 125I-labeled PCSK9 within lysosomes (28). Radioiodinated PCSK9 consisted of intact prodomain and catalytic/C-terminal domain segments (Fig. 3A) and showed a high specificity for binding to LDLRs, as demonstrated by ligand blotting of total membrane protein extracts from HEK293 cells transiently overexpressing LDLR (Fig. 3B). As expected, 125I-labeled PCSK9-D374Y displayed increased binding affinity for LDLRs compared with wild-type PCSK9 (Fig. 3B). For cellular degradation studies, SV-589 and HepG2 cells were pulse-labeled for 1 h with 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 (2 µg/ml) or PCSK9-D374Y (0.5 µg/ml) followed by a 6 h chase period. Excreted 125I-monoiodotyrosine (TCA-soluble), a catabolic product of lysosomal degradation of 125I-labeled proteins (38), was then measured in the culture medium as a determinant of lysosomal trafficking and degradation of internalized radioiodinated PCSK9. These values were corrected for nonlysosomal degradation, measured as TCA-soluble radioactivity generated in cells preincubated with 50 µM chloroquine (typically less than 10% of total counts). Internalized 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 was degraded in lysosomes of SV-589 fibroblasts at high levels comparable to that in HepG2 cells (Fig. 3C). Despite a 4-fold lower concentration used for cell labeling, 125I-PCSK9-D374Y was degraded at 2.6-fold and 1.5-fold higher levels than wild-type PCSK9 in HepG2 cells and SV-589 fibroblasts, respectively. Thus, the efficiency of PCSK9-D374Y degradation was approximately 10-fold higher than wild-type PCSK9 in HepG2 cells compared with approximately 6-fold in SV-589 cells (Fig. 3D). HepG2 cells and SV-589 fibroblasts internalized and degraded equivalent amounts of 125I-labeled C7 monoclonal antibody, which releases from the LDLR within the acidic environment of early endosomes (41), indicating that cell surface LDLR expression and receptor endocytosis were comparable between the two cell-lines (data not shown).
To further confirm lysosomal trafficking of PCSK9 proteins in SV-589 fibroblasts, we performed live-cell confocal microscopy analysis to assess colocalization of internalized Alexa488-labeled wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y with LysoTracker, a cell-stain specific for acidic late endosomes/lysosomes. Cells were first pulse-labeled with fluorescently-labeled PCSK9 proteins for 1 h in medium containing E64, an inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteases, then washed to remove unbound label and incubated for a further 6 h in the presence of E64. Internalized Alexa488-labeled PCSK9 was initially localized in diffuse punctate structures throughout the cytoplasm that over a 6 h time-period showed increased colocalization with LysoTracker (Fig. 4), indicating the trafficking of both wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y to lysosomes.
Internalized mutant PCSK9-D374Y, but not wild-type PCSK9, enters a recycling pathway in SV-589 fibroblasts
Relative to the degradation of wild-type PCSK9, the degradation of 125I-labeled PCSK9-D374Y appeared to be less efficient in SV-589 fibroblasts compared with HepG2 cells (Fig. 3D), suggesting that a lower proportion of internalized PCSK9-D374Y traffics to lysosomes in fibroblasts. To assess potential cell surface recycling of this LDLR ligand in SV-589 fibroblasts, we performed live-cell confocal microscopy analysis to determine colocalization of internalized Alexa488-labeled PCSK9-D374Y with Alexa647-labeled transferrin (Tf), a marker of the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC). Cells were pulsed with fluorophore-labeled PCSK9-D374Y and Tf for 1 h, followed by a 4 h chase period to allow movement out of early endosomal compartments. Following this treatment, PCSK9-D374Y was robustly colocalized with Tf in punctate cytoplasmic structures, indicating that a substantial proportion of internalized PCSK9-D374Y trafficked to the ERC in SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 5A, C). In contrast, there was minimal ERC localization of internalized Alexa488-labeled wild-type PCSK9 under the same conditions (Fig. 5B, C), consistent with predominant trafficking of wild-type PCSK9 to lysosomes.
To quantify the amount of cell surface recycling of wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y in SV-589 fibroblasts, we turned to a recycling assay using PCSK9 covalently modified with thiol-cleavable biotin (S-S-biotin). Biotinylated PCSK9 was labeled in solution with IRDye800-labeled streptavidin and added to cells for 1 h to allow uptake of fluorescent PCSK9-S-S-biotin–800streptavidin complexes. To remove surface fluorescence, cells were washed in a buffer containing the reducing agent TCEP, which is highly charged and does not cross cell membranes (42). Labeled cells were then cultured in medium containing TCEP to cleave the releasable fluorescent tag from PCSK9 complexes returning to the cell surface, and time-dependent loss of cell-associated fluorescence was quantified as a measure of endocytic recycling (Fig. 6A). Culture medium also contained E64 to prevent potential loss of cell-associated fluorescence due to lysosomal degradation. Following a 6 h period, greater than 50% of internalized PCSK9-D374Y complexes recycled to the cell surface versus less than 10% for wild-type PCSK9 (Fig. 6B), further demonstrating the differential trafficking of wild-type PCSK9 and PCSK9-D374Y in SV-589 fibroblasts. Under identical assay conditions, there was less than 10% loss of fluorescence for internalized wild-type PCSK9 or PCSK9-D374Y in HepG2 cells (Fig. 6C), consistent with predominant trafficking of PCSK9 to lysosomes in hepatic cells.
DISCUSSION
The degree of LDLR degradation in response to exogenous PCSK9 varies among cell-types in culture. PCSK9 efficiently targets the LDLR for lysosomal degradation in liver-derived cells but not immortalized fibroblast cell-lines, despite LDLR-dependent uptake into endolysosomal compartments (5, 35). It is unknown whether internalized PCSK9 remains associated with LDLR in resistant cell-types, or if it dissociates within early endosomes prior to LDLR recycling. In the current study, we report that PCSK9 is released from the LDLR and delivered to lysosomes as a dissociated ligand in SV-589 cells, a line of SV40-transformed human skin fibroblasts with a robust PCSK9-resistant phenotype. A gain-of-function D374Y mutant PCSK9 with increased binding affinity to LDLR was capable of directing LDLR degradation in a limited manner in these cells; however, much of the internalized PCSK9-D374Y was recycled to the cell surface, presumably still bound to the LDLR. We conclude that two factors diminish PCSK9 activity in SV-589 fibroblasts: i) an increased dissociation from the LDLR in early endosomes, and ii) a decreased ability of bound PCSK9 to inhibit LDLR recycling.
Tissue specificity to circulating PCSK9 has been observed in mice, with PCSK9 activity toward LDLRs being suppressed in extrahepatic tissues such as adrenal gland and kidney (27, 43, 44). Compared with liver, there was decreased accumulation of injected 125I-labeled PCSK9 in adrenal gland in a recent study (45), suggesting that PCSK9 uptake was inhibited in this tissue, perhaps due to a blocking effect on LDLR binding exerted by extracellular annexin A2 (44, 46). In contrast, cell-association and uptake of exogenous wild-type PCSK9 and gain-of-function PCSK9-D374Y was normal in PCSK9-resistant SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 1), thus implicating an intracellular mechanism of PCSK9 inhibition. In SV-589 cells treated with sterols to suppress LDLR mRNA and protein expression, the uptake of PCSK9 was reduced to almost undetectable levels (Fig. 2). This is in agreement with a previous report in which an unambiguous role of the LDLR for PCSK9 internalization was determined through the use of MEF cells derived from wild-type or Ldlr−/− mice (5). Missense mutations in PCSK9 (D374Y) or LDLR (H306Y) that improve specific bond interactions at the PCSK9-LDLR interface increased cellular uptake of PCSK9 accordingly (5, 19). Injection studies in mice demonstrated that the plasma clearance rate of gain-of-function PCSK9-D374Y was increased compared with that of wild-type PCSK9, supporting a direct role of LDLR in PCSK9 uptake in vivo (27). A recent report suggests that PCSK9 degradation in hepatic cells is directly mediated by an interaction with amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2), a ubiquitously expressed cell surface protein known to be involved in lysosomal trafficking of MHC class I Kd molecules (47). In this model, constitutive lysosomal trafficking of PCSK9 is mediated by APLP2, and LDLR is degraded as a consequence of binding to PCSK9; LDLR-dependence of PCSK9 uptake is explained by an unappreciated role of the LDLR in the organization of endocytic adaptor proteins and receptor clustering at the plasma membrane. However, it should be noted that LDLR is dispersed on the plasma membrane in hepatocytes but clustered in coated pits in fibroblasts (48). The viability of Ldlr−/− mice also argues against a general role of the LDLR in adaptor protein recruitment and receptor clustering in coated pits. PCSK9 association with APLP2 requires the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 (47) and could explain antigen-mediated clearance of therapeutic blocking antibodies targeting the PCSK9 catalytic domain (49). However, this pathway may not represent a predominant means of PCSK9 internalization in cells and tissues when LDLR binding is not inhibited.
In the current study, we found that lysosomal degradation of 125I-labeled PCSK9-D374Y was 2.6-fold higher than wild-type PCSK9 in HepG2 cells despite being added to culture medium at a 4-fold lower concentration (Fig. 3C). Thus, the efficiency of PCSK9-D374Y degradation was approximately 10-fold higher than wild-type PCSK9, in accordance with a 10- to 25-fold increased binding affinity to the LDLR at physiological pH. PCSK9-D374Y treatment (2 µg/ml) reduced cell surface LDLRs in SV-589 cells by approximately 50% (Fig. 1B), indicating that this gain-of-function mutant PCSK9 was able to direct LDLR degradation, albeit at lower levels than in HepG2 cells. Decreased LDLR degradation activity by PCSK9-D374Y in SV-589 fibroblasts could be due to inefficient lysosomal targeting of LDLRs by bound PCSK9. Indeed, internalized PCSK9-D374Y was shown to traffic to either lysosomes (Fig. 4) or to transferrin-positive endocytic recycling compartments in SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 5). We did not observe localization of fluorophore-labeled PCSK9-D374Y in endocytic recycling compartments of HepG2 cells (data not shown).
One potential mechanism for LDLR degradation mediated by PCSK9 is through interference with a closed conformation of the LDLR in acidic endocytic compartments (28–30). LDLR mutations that negatively affect the closed conformation lead to defective LDLR recycling and increased degradation in cultured cells (50–52). Surprisingly, a large proportion (>50%) of internalized PCSK9-D374Y recycled to the cell surface in SV-589 fibroblasts, presumably still bound to the LDLR (Fig. 6B). This suggests that bound PCSK9 does not greatly affect the open-to-closed conformational switch in SV-589 cells or that other factors are required for efficient degradation of LDLR. In fibroblasts, endocytosis of LDLR in clathrin-coated vesicles is predominantly mediated by the adaptor protein Disabled-2 (53), whereas ARH is required for endocytosis of LDLR in hepatic cells (54). ARH was shown to be essential for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation in primary mouse hepatocytes (5) but not in primary human fibroblasts (35). There is evidence that membrane receptors and their ligands can be sorted into clathrin-coated vesicles that merge with distinct subpopulations of early endosomes depending on the adaptor proteins involved (55, 56). The divergence of pathways for PCSK9-D374Y bound to LDLR in SV-589 fibroblasts (lysosomal versus recycling) may reflect less stringent adaptor-mediated sorting in fibroblasts compared with hepatocytes.
Importantly, we found that internalized 125I-labeled wild-type PCSK9 was degraded in lysosomes at comparable levels in HepG2 cells and SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 3C). Since cell surface LDLR levels were minimally decreased in SV-589 cells in response to PCSK9 (Fig. 1), this indicates that the majority of internalized PCSK9 was released from the LDLR, which was then free to recycle to the cell surface. In further support of this conclusion, we demonstrated that wild-type PCSK9 trafficked to lysosomes in SV-589 fibroblasts (Fig. 4) and did not recycle to the cell surface (Fig. 6A, B). The finding that PCSK9 releases from LDLRs in acidic early endosomes of certain cell-types was unanticipated since in vitro studies have shown that the binding affinity of PCSK9 to LDLR is greatly enhanced (>100-fold) at acidic pH (<5.5) as compared with physiological pH 7.4 (12, 13). However, a study of 125I-labeled PCSK9 binding to LDLR showed that the most pronounced increase occurred over a pH range (6.0–5.2) typical of late endosomal compartments (9). Therefore the pH effect could be more modest in early endosomes that are mildly acidic (5.9–6.8) and perhaps outweighed by other factors that promote PCSK9 dissociation from LDLR.
The LDLR EGF-A domain contains a noncanonical Ca2+ binding site (57) and Ca2+ coordination is required for PCSK9 association (9). Interestingly, the KD for the Ca2+ binding in the EGF-A domain was determined to be approximately 50 µM, leading to the suggestion that the EGF-A Ca2+ site may be titrated in the low Ca2+ environment of early endosomes (∼10–50 µM) (57). This could in turn trigger PCSK9 dissociation dependent on other factors such as pH and PCSK9 mutations that affect LDLR binding affinity. It is possible the pH and Ca2+ environment in early endosomes of hepatocytes strongly favors persistent PCSK9 binding to LDLR, whereas alterations in these parameters (higher pH and/or lower Ca2+) favor PCSK9 dissociation in resistant cells. The luminal ionic composition in the endolysosomal compartment can vary in an incremental manner between cell-types, largely dependent on differential expression of membrane ion pumps and channels (58, 59). This could dictate a range of potencies for PCSK9-mediated LDLR degradation across various cell-types and tissues, with hepatocytes and immortalized fibroblasts representing different ends of the spectrum. Dissociation of wild-type PCSK9 from the LDLR in early endosomes of SV-589 fibroblasts was likely not absolute, as high concentrations (20 µg/ml) significantly lowered cell surface LDLRs by approximately 25% (Fig. 1B).
For PCSK9 to direct LDLR trafficking it must remain bound to the receptor in early endosomes, a major site for the sorting of membrane components destined for recycling to the cell surface from those targeted for degradation in lysosomes. Our findings identify dissociation from the LDLR in early endosomal compartments as a determining mechanism for cell-type-specific resistance to PCSK9, a protein of major clinical importance for its ability to mediate LDLR degradation in liver. Continued study of the mechanisms regulating PCSK9 release from recycling LDLRs in PCSK9-resistant fibroblasts could shed light on factors that promote persistent binding in hepatocytes, eventually leading to LDLR degradation.
Footnotes
Abbreviations:
- ADH
- autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia
- EGF
- epidermal growth factor
- ERC
- endocytic recycling compartment
- LDL-C
- LDL-cholesterol
- LDLR
- LDL receptor
- MHC
- major histocompatibility complex
- PCSK9
- proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9
- TCEP
- Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
- TfR
- transferrin receptor
This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant MOP 106462 (to T.A.L.). T.A.L. is supported in part by Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada New Investigator Award.
REFERENCES
- 1.Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. 2009. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29: 431–438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rudenko G., Henry L., Henderson K., Ichtchenko K., Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L., Deisenhofer J. 2002. Structure of the LDL receptor extracellular domain at endosomal pH. Science. 298: 2353–2358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rudenko G., Deisenhofer J. 2003. The low-density lipoprotein receptor: ligands, debates and lore. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13: 683–689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L. 1981. Lowering plasma cholesterol by raising LDL receptors. N. Engl. J. Med. 305: 515–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lagace T. A., Curtis D. E., Garuti R., McNutt M. C., Park S. W., Prather H. B., Anderson N. N., Ho Y. K., Hammer R. E., Horton J. D. 2006. Secreted PCSK9 decreases the number of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and in livers of parabiotic mice. J. Clin. Invest. 116: 2995–3005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lambert G., Sjouke B., Choque B., Kastelein J. J., Hovingh G. K. 2012. The PCSK9 decade. J. Lipid Res. 53: 2515–2524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Seidah N. G., Prat A. 2012. The biology and therapeutic targeting of the proprotein convertases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11: 367–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Benjannet S., Rhainds D., Essalmani R., Mayne J., Wickham L., Jin W., Asselin M. C., Hamelin J., Varret M., Allard D., et al. 2004. NARC-1/PCSK9 and its natural mutants: zymogen cleavage and effects on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and LDL cholesterol. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 48865–48875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang D-W., Lagace T. A., Garuti R., Zhao Z., McDonald M., Horton J. D., Cohen J. C., Hobbs H. H. 2007. Binding of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 to epidermal growth factor-like repeat A of low density lipoprotein receptor decreases receptor recycling and increases degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 18602–18612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lambert G., Charlton F., Rye K. A., Piper D. E. 2009. Molecular basis of PCSK9 function. Atherosclerosis. 203: 1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Horton J. D., Cohen J. C., Hobbs H. H. 2009. PCSK9: a convertase that coordinates LDL catabolism. J. Lipid Res. 50(Suppl.): S172–S177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cunningham D., Danley D. E., Geoghegan K. F., Griffor M. C., Hawkins J. L., Subashi T. A., Varghese A. H., Ammirati M. J., Culp J. S., Hoth L. R., et al. 2007. Structural and biophysical studies of PCSK9 and its mutants linked to familial hypercholesterolemia. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14: 413–419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Piper D. E., Jackson S., Liu Q., Romanow W. G., Shetterly S., Thibault S. T., Shan B., Walker N. P. 2007. The crystal structure of PCSK9: A regulator of plasma LDL-cholesterol. Structure. 15: 545–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abifadel M., Varret M., Rabes J. P., Allard D., Ouguerram K., Devillers M., Cruaud C., Benjannet S., Wickham L., Erlich D., et al. 2003. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat. Genet. 34: 154–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abifadel M., Rabes J. P., Devillers M., Munnich A., Erlich D., Junien C., Varret M., Boileau C. 2009. Mutations and polymorphisms in the proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) gene in cholesterol metabolism and disease. Hum. Mutat. 30: 520–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naoumova R. P., Tosi I., Patel D., Neuwirth C., Horswell S. D., Marais A. D., van Heyningen C., Soutar A. K. 2005. Severe hypercholesterolemia in four British families with the D374Y mutation in the PCSK9 gene: long-term follow-up and treatment response. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25: 2654–2660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kwon H. J., Lagace T. A., McNutt M. C., Horton J. D., Deisenhofer J. 2008. Molecular basis for LDL receptor recognition by PCSK9. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105: 1820–1825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bottomley M. J., Cirillo A., Orsatti L., Ruggeri L., Fisher T. S., Santoro J. C., Cummings R. T., Cubbon R. M., Lo Surdo P., Calzetta A., et al. 2009. Structural and biochemical characterization of the wild type PCSK9/EGF-AB complex and natural FH mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 1313–1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McNutt M. C., Kwon H. J., Chen C., Chen J. R., Horton J. D., Lagace T. A. 2009. Antagonism of secreted PCSK9 increases low-density lipoprotein receptor expression in HEPG2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 10561–10570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cohen J., Pertsemlidis A., Kotowski I. K., Graham R., Garcia C. K., Hobbs H. H. 2005. Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9. Nat. Genet. 37: 161–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cohen J. C., Boerwinkle E., Mosley T. H., Hobbs H. H. 2006. Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 354: 1264–1272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stein E. A., Gipe D., Bergeron J., Gaudet D., Weiss R., Dufour R., Wu R., Pordy R. 2012. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, REGN727/SAR236553, to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia on stable statin dose with or without ezetimibe therapy: a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 380: 29–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Giugliano R. P., Desai N. R., Kohli P., Rogers W. J., Somaratne R., Huang F., Liu T., Mohanavelu S., Hoffman E. B., McDonald S. T., et al. 2012. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in combination with a statin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (LAPLACE-TIMI 57): a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 study. Lancet. 380: 2007–2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee P., Hegele R. A. 2013. Current Phase II proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitor therapies for dyslipidemia. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 22: 1411–1423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Seidah N. G., Benjannet S., Wickham L., Marcinkiewicz J., Jasmin S. B., Stifani S., Basak A., Prat A., Chretien M. 2003. The secretory proprotein convertase neural apoptosis-regulated convertase 1 (NARC-1): liver regeneration and neuronal differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100: 928–933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McNutt M. C., Lagace T. A., Horton J. D. 2007. Catalytic activity is not required for secreted PCSK9 to reduce low density lipoprotein receptors in HepG2 Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 20799–20803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grefhorst A., McNutt M. C., Lagace T. A., Horton J. D. 2008. Plasma PCSK9 preferentially reduces liver LDL receptors in mice. J. Lipid Res. 49: 1303–1311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang D. W., Garuti R., Tang W. J., Cohen J. C., Hobbs H. H. 2008. Structural requirements for PCSK9-mediated degradation of the low-density lipoprotein receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105: 13045–13050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lo Surdo P., Bottomley M. J., Calzetta A., Settembre E. C., Cirillo A., Pandit S., Ni Y. G., Hubbard B., Sitlani A., Carfi A. 2011. Mechanistic implications for LDL receptor degradation from the PCSK9/LDLR structure at neutral pH. EMBO Rep. 12: 1300–1305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tveten K., Strom T. B., Berge K. E., Leren T. P. 2013. PCSK9-mediated degradation of the LDL receptor generates a 17 kDa C-terminal LDL receptor fragment. J. Lipid Res. 54: 1560–1566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yamamoto T., Lu C., Ryan R. O. 2011. A two-step binding model of PCSK9 interaction with the low density lipoprotein receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 286: 5464–5470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Du F., Hui Y., Zhang M., Linton M. F., Fazio S., Fan D. 2011. Novel domain interaction regulates secretion of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286: 43054–43061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Saavedra Y. G., Day R., Seidah N. G. 2012. The M2 module of the Cys-His-rich domain (CHRD) of PCSK9 protein is needed for the extracellular low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) degradation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 43492–43501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tveten K., Holla O. L., Cameron J., Strom T. B., Berge K. E., Laerdahl J. K., Leren T. P. 2012. Interaction between the ligand-binding domain of the LDL receptor and the C-terminal domain of PCSK9 is required for PCSK9 to remain bound to the LDL receptor during endosomal acidification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21: 1402–1409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang Y., Huang Y., Hobbs H. H., Cohen J. C. 2012. Molecular characterization of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-mediated degradation of the LDLR. J. Lipid Res. 53: 1932–1943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Russell D. W., Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L. 1989. Different combinations of cysteine-rich repeats mediate binding of low density lipoprotein receptor to two different proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 21682–21688 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brown M. S., Faust J. R., Goldstein J. L., Kaneko I., Endo A. 1978. Induction of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity in human fibroblasts incubated with compactin (ML-236B), a competitive inhibitor of the reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 253: 1121–1128 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goldstein J. L., Basu S. K., Brown M. S. 1983. Receptor-mediated endocytosis of low-density lipoprotein in cultured cells. Methods Enzymol. 98: 241–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kosenko T., Golder M., Leblond G., Weng W., Lagace T. A. 2013. Low-density lipoprotein binds to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 (PCSK9) in human plasma and inhibits PCSK9-mediated LDL receptor degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 288: 8279–8288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lakoski S. G., Lagace T. A., Cohen J. C., Horton J. D., Hobbs H. H. 2009. Genetic and metabolic determinants of plasma PCSK9 levels. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94: 2537–2543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Beisiegel U., Schneider W. J., Goldstein J. L., Anderson R. G., Brown M. S. 1981. Monoclonal antibodies to the low density lipoprotein receptor as probes for study of receptor-mediated endocytosis and the genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Biol. Chem. 256: 11923–11931 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cole N. B., Donaldson J. G. 2012. Releasable SNAP-tag probes for studying endocytosis and recycling. ACS Chem. Biol. 7: 464–469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luo Y., Warren L., Xia D., Jensen H., Sand T., Petras S., Qin W., Miller K. S., Hawkins J. 2009. Function and distribution of circulating human PCSK9 expressed extrahepatically in transgenic mice. J. Lipid Res. 50: 1581–1588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Seidah N. G., Poirier S., Denis M., Parker R., Miao B., Mapelli C., Prat A., Wassef H., Davignon J., Hajjar K. A., et al. 2012. Annexin A2 is a natural extrahepatic inhibitor of the PCSK9-induced LDL receptor degradation. PLoS ONE. 7: e41865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tavori H., Fan D., Blakemore J. L., Yancey P. G., Ding L., Linton M. F., Fazio S. 2013. Serum proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and cell surface low-density lipoprotein receptor: evidence for a reciprocal regulation. Circulation. 127: 2403–2413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mayer G., Poirier S., Seidah N. G. 2008. Annexin A2 is a C-terminal PCSK9-binding protein that regulates endogenous low density lipoprotein receptor levels. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 31791–31801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.DeVay R. M., Shelton D. L., Liang H. 2013. Characterization of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) trafficking reveals a novel lysosomal targeting mechanism via amyloid precursor-like protein 2 (APLP2). J. Biol. Chem. 288: 10805–10818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pathak R. K., Yokode M., Hammer R. E., Hofmann S. L., Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L., Anderson R. G. 1990. Tissue-specific sorting of the human LDL receptor in polarized epithelia of transgenic mice. J. Cell Biol. 111: 347–359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chaparro-Riggers J., Liang H., DeVay R. M., Bai L., Sutton J. E., Chen W., Geng T., Lindquist K., Casas M. G., Boustany L. M., et al. 2012. Increasing serum half-life and extending cholesterol lowering in vivo by engineering antibody with pH-sensitive binding to PCSK9. J. Biol. Chem. 287: 11090–11097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davis C. G., Goldstein J. L., Sudhof T. C., Anderson R. G., Russell D. W., Brown M. S. 1987. Acid-dependent ligand dissociation and recycling of LDL receptor mediated by growth factor homology region. Nature. 326: 760–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hobbs H. H., Brown M. S., Goldstein J. L. 1992. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum. Mutat. 1: 445–466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.van der Westhuyzen D. R., Stein M. L., Henderson H. E., Marais A. D., Fourie A. M., Coetzee G. A. 1991. Deletion of two growth-factor repeats from the low-density-lipoprotein receptor accelerates its degradation. Biochem. J. 277: 677–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Maurer M. E., Cooper J. A. 2006. The adaptor protein Dab2 sorts LDL receptors into coated pits independently of AP-2 and ARH. J. Cell Sci. 119: 4235–4246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jones C., Hammer R. E., Li W-P., Cohen J. C., Hobbs H. H., Herz J. 2003. Normal sorting but defective endocytosis of the low density lipoprotein receptor in mice with autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 29024–29030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lakadamyali M., Rust M. J., Zhuang X. 2006. Ligands for clathrin-mediated endocytosis are differentially sorted into distinct populations of early endosomes. Cell. 124: 997–1009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Traub L. M. 2009. Tickets to ride: selecting cargo for clathrin-regulated internalization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10: 583–596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Malby S., Pickering R., Saha S., Smallridge R., Linse S., Downing A. K. 2001. The first epidermal growth factor-like domain of the low-density lipoprotein receptor contains a noncanonical calcium binding site. Biochemistry. 40: 2555–2563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Scott C. C., Gruenberg J. 2011. Ion flux and the function of endosomes and lysosomes: pH is just the start: the flux of ions across endosomal membranes influences endosome function not only through regulation of the luminal pH. Bioessays. 33: 103–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Diering G. H., Numata Y., Fan S., Church J., Numata M. 2013. Endosomal Acidification by Na,+/H+ Exchanger NHE5 Regulates TrkA Cell-Surface Targeting and NGF-Induced PI3K Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell. 24: 3435–3448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]