Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2013 Sep 30;77:224–233. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.09.019

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Immunoblot results for ΔFosB expression in the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens following repeated vehicle or THC administration in wild type and CB1R knockout mice. Blots were probed with antibodies directed against ΔFosB and α-tubulin (loading control). (A and B) Graphs showing densitometric analysis of brain regions from vehicle- and THC-treated mice expressed as percent vehicle control. For CPU, data are means ± SEM with ^ p < 0.05 and ^^ p < 0.01 versus wild type vehicle controls, Dunnett’s post-hoc test following a one-way ANOVA, n = 7–8 mice per group. For NAC, data are means ± SEM with * p < 0.05 versus wild type vehicle controls, Bonferroni post-hoc test following a two-way ANOVA, n = 7–8 mice per group. (C and D) Representative blots showing ΔFosB-ir and α-tubulin-ir in vehicle- and THC-treated brains of wild type and CB1R knockout mice for each region examined.