Skip to main content
American Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to American Journal of Epidemiology
. 2013 Sep 9;178(9):1442–1451. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt159

Racial Disparities in Short Sleep Duration by Occupation and Industry

Chandra L Jackson *, Susan Redline, Ichiro Kawachi, Michelle A Williams, Frank B Hu
PMCID: PMC3888251  PMID: 24018914

Abstract

Short sleep duration, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, has been shown to vary by occupation and industry, but few studies have investigated differences between black and white populations. By using data from a nationally representative sample of US adult short sleepers (n = 41,088) in the National Health Interview Survey in 2004–2011, we estimated prevalence ratios for short sleep duration in blacks compared with whites for each of 8 industry categories by using adjusted Poisson regression models with robust variance. Participants' mean age was 47 years; 50% were women and 13% were black. Blacks were more likely to report short sleep duration than whites (37% vs. 28%), and the black-white disparity was widest among those who held professional occupations. Adjusted short sleep duration was more prevalent in blacks than whites in the following industry categories: finance/information/real estate (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 1.59); professional/administrative/management (PR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.44); educational services (PR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.54); public administration/arts/other services (PR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.41); health care/social assistance (PR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.32); and manufacturing/construction (PR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.20). Short sleep generally increased with increasing professional responsibility within a given industry among blacks but decreased with increasing professional roles among whites. Our results suggest the need for further investigation of racial/ethnic differences in the work-sleep relationship.

Keywords: industry, occupation, race, sleep, work


Studies suggest that mean sleep duration among US adults has decreased over time (1), which is of public health concern because insufficient sleep has been linked to increased risk of poor health (self-reported), weight gain and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and mortality (212). The prevalence of short sleep duration has been shown to vary by industry and occupation among US workers (13, 14), with work affecting sleep through several factors, including long/extended work hours, rotating or shift work, and job-related stress (1418). The internet and email capabilities, cellular phones, and other communication devices have resulted in employees becoming perpetually available and capable of communicating and engaging in work in ways and during times that may displace sleep (19, 20).

US blacks may be at particularly high risk for insufficient sleep-related morbidity and mortality (21, 22), and racial differences in sleep duration by industry and occupation may arise for various reasons. For instance, blacks employed across various industries are more likely to work nontraditional shifts with nonstandard work schedules (especially night shifts) and to have long working hours, which can negatively affect health through insufficient sleep duration by, for example, disrupting circadian rhythms and increasing one's appetite for sweet and salty foods (2231). Compared with whites, blacks are also more likely to report general job stress, to experience objective and perceived discrimination, to work in positions with low control/high demand and that involve low decision-making power, to work multiple low-wage jobs, and to live in poverty despite being employed (26, 27, 3238).

Understanding the impact of occupation and industry of employment on sleep, as well as how blacks and whites may be differentially affected, can help identify racial disparities and enable the creation of tailored, mitigating interventions. However, few studies have investigated black-white differences in the work-sleep relationship. Therefore, we sought to examine racial/ethnic differences in short sleep duration by industry of employment by using a nationally representative sample of US adults reporting short sleep duration in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) from 2004 to 2011. We hypothesized that 1) the prevalence of short sleep duration would increase for both blacks and whites; 2) blacks compared with whites would have a consistently higher prevalence of short sleep duration across industries; and 3) these racial/ethnic disparities would persist over the study period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Health Interview Survey

We analyzed data from the NHIS, which is a series of cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys that use a 3-stage stratified cluster probability sampling design to conduct in-person interviews in households of noninstitutionalized US civilians. A detailed description of NHIS procedures is available elsewhere (39). Briefly, each week (on a continuous basis), a probability sample of households was interviewed by trained interviewers from the US Census Bureau (Spauldings, Maryland) to obtain information about health and other characteristics of each member of the sampled households. The data collection interviews were conducted through computer-assisted personal interviewing. From each sampled family, 1 adult and 1 child were randomly selected to provide additional health-related information. The final response rate for sampled adults, who were the basis for this analysis, was 67% (range, 61%–72%). Our study was approved by the Harvard School of Public Health's institutional review board.

Study participants

Participants included self-reported non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic black (hereafter, white and black) adults aged 18 years and older. Participants were excluded if they 1) were born outside the US; 2) had an extreme body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2) value of less than 15 or greater than 70; or 3) had missing data on sleep, industry of employment, or employment status. Our final sample comprised 136,815 adults, of whom 41,088 (30%) were considered short sleepers (<7 hours/day), 41,495 (31%) were considered optimal sleepers (7 hours/day), and 54,232 (39%) were considered long sleepers (>7 hours/day) (Web Figure 1, available at http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/). We excluded non–US born participants because evidence suggests that sleep patterns among US immigrants differ from those among individuals born in the United States (40). Military personnel were excluded because the NHIS is not designed to provide accurate estimates in this population.

Measures

Sleep duration

Sampled adults who were 18 years of age or older reported how many hours they sleep, on average, in a 24-hour period. Interviewers were instructed to report the hours of sleep in whole numbers, rounding values of 30 minutes or more up to the nearest hour and rounding values less than 30 minutes down to the nearest hour. Short sleep duration was defined as a usual sleep duration of less than 7 hours; optimal sleep was defined as 7 hours; and long sleep was defined as more than 7 hours. Seven hours of sleep was used as the reference because it is associated with the lowest levels of morbidity and mortality (8, 12).

Race/ethnicity

Participants were asked, “What race or races do you consider yourself to be?” They then selected 1 or more of the following categories: white, black/African American, American Indian/Alaskan native, Asian, or multiple races. Our analysis focuses on blacks/African Americans and whites because the underlying biological and social mechanisms leading to differences in sleep duration are likely to vary by race/ethnicity, and whites are customarily used as the comparison group for greater statistical stability because they have the largest sample size.

Industry of occupation

We grouped the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) (NAICS Association, LLC, Rockaway, New Jersey) codes into 8 meaningful industry categories as follows: 1) agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting (NAICS code 11); mining (NAICS code 21); utilities (NAICS code 22); construction (NAICS code 23); manufacturing (NAICS codes 31–33); wholesale trade (NAICS code 42); and transportation and warehousing (NAICS codes 48–49); 2) retail trade (NAICS codes 44–45); 3) information (NAICS code 51); finance and insurance (NAICS code 52); and real estate rental and leasing (NAICS code 53); 4) professional, scientific, and technical services (NAICS code 54); management of companies and enterprises (NAICS code 55); and administrative and support and waste management and remediation services (NAICS code 56); 5) educational services (NAICS code 82); 6) health care and social assistance (NAICS code 62); 7) accommodation and food services (NAICS code 72); and 8) other services (except public administration) (NAICS code 81); public administration (NAICS code 92); and arts, entertainment, and recreation (NAICS code 71).

Employment and socioeconomic status

Employment status in the week prior to the interview was ascertained for all adults and was categorized as “working for pay,” “working without pay,” “job not at work” (meaning the subject held a job but did not work in the week prior to the interview), “unemployed,” or “not in the labor force.” Educational attainment was categorized as less than high school (no high school diploma), high school (high school or general equivalency diploma), and greater than high school (any education beyond high school). Annual household income was dichotomized as above or below $35,000, and poverty status was based on being below the poverty line after the participants' best estimates of total income of all family members from all sources before taxes. Adults who were working at a paying or nonpaying job during the week prior to the survey, those who had a job or business but were not at work during the prior week, and those who ever worked were asked about their occupations, which were categorized on the basis of the Standard Occupational Classification System (http://www.bls.gov/soc/). We combined occupations into categories of professional/management, support services, or laborers on the basis of type of work. Class of work/occupation (based on current, longest held, or most recently held job or work situation) was classified as either 1) an employee of a private company, business, or individual for wages, salary, or commission; 2) a federal, state, or local government employee; 3) self-employed in own business, professional practice, or farm; or 4) working without pay in a family-owned business or farm.

Health behaviors

Smoking status and lifetime alcohol drinking status were categorized as “ever” or “never.” Leisure-time physical activity was categorized as “none,” “low,” or “high.” Participants who engaged in at least some level of activity and who provided a specific number of activity bouts were dichotomized at the midpoint of these bouts and classified as having activity levels of “low” or “high.” Participants reporting “never” or “unable to do this type activity” were categorized as “none.”

Medical conditions

Sampled adults were asked if they had ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that they had “hypertension, also called high blood pressure” and, separately, if they had “diabetes or sugar diabetes.” Participants were also asked if a doctor or other health professional had ever diagnosed them as having any kind of heart condition or disease other than coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, or a myocardial infarction, as well as if a doctor or other health professional had ever diagnosed them as having coronary heart disease. We combined these variables to adjust for heart disease.

Covariates

Self-reported height and weight were used to calculate BMI. Obesity was defined as a BMI value of 30 or higher, overweight as 25.0–29.9, normal weight as 18.5–24.9, and underweight as less than 18.5 (19). Marital status was categorized as married/living with a partner, divorced/separated/widowed, or never married. Regions of the country were categorized as South, Midwest, Northeast, or West. Self-reported general health status was categorized as excellent/very good, good, or fair/poor.

Statistical analysis

We pooled 8 survey years (2004–2011) of NHIS data merged by the Integrated Health Interview Series (https://www.ihis.us/ihis/). For all analyses, we used sampling weights that account for the unequal probabilities of selection resulting from the sample design, nonresponse, and oversampling of certain subgroups. Standard errors or variance estimations were calculated by using Taylor series linearization (41). Stata, version 12, software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas) was used for all analyses.

Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard errors, whereas categorical variables were presented as absolute values with corresponding percentages. We used Rao-Scott second-order corrected Pearson statistics that take survey weights into account to test for differences in prespecified sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics of interest between whites and blacks, as well as sleep duration (41).

To estimate prevalence ratios for short sleep duration among blacks compared with whites by industry, we used 5 different Poisson regression models with a robust variance estimator (43). Prespecified socioeconomic, health behavior, demographic, and clinical characteristics were entered into the model as a group in an inclusive stepwise manner, and white participants were used as the reference for the black-white comparisons. For models stratified by race for blacks and whites, as well as for a separate model with an interaction term for race and sleep, we first adjusted for age in 3 categories (18–49 years, 50–64 years, or ≥65 years) and then for demographic factors (i.e., sex, marital status, and educational attainment) in our second model. We subsequently adjusted for health behaviors, including smoking status, alcohol consumption, and leisure-time physical activity in the third model before adjusting for self-reported health status, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and 4 standard BMI categories in the fourth model. The final model adjusted for living in poverty, class of occupation, occupation, and annual household income above or below $35,000.

To test for race-specific temporal trends in short sleep duration over time by industry of employment, we again used Rao-Scott second-order corrected Pearson statistics for each industry among blacks and whites, separately. To test for potential black-white differences in the prevalence of short sleep duration in a pooled analysis, we introduced interaction terms for race and survey year with 2 years combined for separate linear regression models.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the study population

Among the 136,815 participants, the mean age was 47 years; 50% were women; 13% were black; 28% (for whites, 30%; for blacks, 17%) had at least a college education; and 29% reported short sleep duration. Table 1 shows weighted estimates of the age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by sociodemographic, health behavior, and clinical characteristics among black and white participants. Web Table 1 displays the mean or prevalence of these characteristics by race/ethnicity among those with short sleep duration. Blacks were more likely than whites to experience short sleep duration (37% vs. 28%). For both blacks and whites, there were no apparent differences in short sleep duration by sex. Regarding education, the greatest prevalence of short sleep duration was among white high school graduates (36%) and among blacks with some college (41%). The prevalence of short sleep duration among individuals living in poverty was similar for both blacks and whites. The overall percentage point difference in short sleep duration between blacks and whites was 16 for those in professional/administrative/management positions, 11 for those in support services, and 4 for laborers.

Table 1.

Age-adjusted Prevalence of Short Sleep Durationa by Sociodemographic, Health Behavior, and Clinical Characteristics Among 136,815 Black and White Participants, United States, 2004–2011

Characteristic Whites
Blacks
Both Races Combined
No. % No. % No. %
Short duration sleepers (sample) 31,752 28 9,336 37 41,088 29
Age group, years
 18–49 17,305 31 5,649 40 22,954 33
 50–64 8,905 29 2,456 40 11,361 31
 ≥65 5,542 21 1,231 29 6,773 22
Women 16,450 28 5,602 38 22,052 29
Men 15,302 28 3,734 37 19,036 29
Educational attainment
 Less than high school 10,053 31 2,882 34 12,935 31
 High school graduate 3,132 36 1,342 35 4,474 36
 Some college 10,656 30 3,461 41 14,117 31
 ≥College degree or higher 7,911 22 1,651 39 9,562 24
Marital status
 Married 14,842 26 2,464 37 17,306 27
 Divorced/separated/ widowed 10,361 35 3,281 38 13,642 36
 Never married 6,482 28 3,558 37 10,040 30
Region of country
 Northeast 5,797 30 1,205 40 7,002 31
 Midwest 9,477 28 1,944 40 11,421 29
 South 10,806 28 5,294 36 16,100 30
 West 5,672 26 893 39 6,565 27
Living in poverty 3,341 37 2,085 38 5,426 37
Household income <$35,000/year 17,392 27 3,618 38 21,010 28
Class of worker
 Private wage 23,627 29 6,682 36 30,309 30
 Government 5,176 26 2,193 39 7,369 28
 Self-employed 2,773 25 408 37 3,181 26
Occupation
 Professional/ management 5,957 25 1,106 41 7,063 27
 Support services 14,092 27 4,446 38 18,538 28
 Laborer 11,461 32 3,704 36 15,165 33
Industry
 Manufacturing/ constructionb 10,133 30 2,343 37 12,476 31
 Retail trade 3,576 29 793 34 4,369 30
 Finance/ information/real estatec 2,769 25 722 38 3,491 27
 Professional/ administrative/ managementd 2,932 25 842 38 3,774 27
 Educational services 2,661 23 858 37 3,519 24
 Health care/social assistance 3,986 29 1,814 39 5,800 31
 Accommodation/ food services 1,926 33 592 34 2,518 33
 Public administration/ arts/other servicese 3,649 27 1,329 38 4,978 29
Health behavior
 Smoking status
  Never 14,732 26 5,492 36 20,224 27
  Current 8,034 28 1,551 39 9,585 29
  Former 8,958 34 2,283 37 11,241 35
 Alcohol consumption
  Never 3,546 27 1,862 33 5,408 28
  Current 18,376 27 4,528 39 22,904 28
  Former 4,731 32 1,382 36 6,113 33
 Leisure-time physical activity
  Never/unable 10,950 31 4,057 36 15,007 32
  Low 10,298 27 2,813 38 13,111 28
  High 10,391 27 2,436 38 12,827 28
 Clinical characteristic
  Overweight/ obesef 20,957 30 7,129 38 28,086 30
  Obeseg 9,783 33 4,030 39 13,813 34
  Hypertension (yes) 10,425 32 3,978 39 14,403 33
  Diabetes (yes) 2,747 33 1,239 40 3,986 35
  Heart disease (yes) 4,269 32 991 39 5,260 34
  Cancer (yes) 3,335 31 459 42 3,794 32
Health status
 Excellent/very good 17,800 25 4,145 34 21,945 26
 Good 8,751 31 2,933 37 11,684 32
 Fair/poor 5,184 40 2,255 44 7,439 41

Abbreviation: NAICS, North American Industrial Classification System.

a Weighted estimates.

b Includes the following NAICS (NAICS Association, LLC, Rockaway, New Jersey) industry categories: agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; mining; utilities; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; and transportation and warehousing.

c Includes the following NAICS industry categories: information; finance and insurance; and real estate rental and leasing.

d Includes the following NAICS industry categories: professional, scientific, and technical services; management of companies and enterprises; and administrative support and waste management and remediation services industries.

e Includes the following NAICS industry categories: public administration; arts, entertainment, and recreation; and other services (except public administration).

f Overweight/obese is defined as a body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) value of 25 or higher.

g Obese is defined as a body mass index value of 30 or higher.

Black-white differences in short sleep duration by industry and occupation

Table 2 shows the adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration for blacks and whites by industry of employment. The adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration was higher among blacks employed in the following industries than among whites employed in the same industries: finance/information/real estate (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 1.59), professional/administrative/management (PR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.44), educational services (PR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.54), public administration/arts/other services (PR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.41), health care/social assistance (PR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.32), and manufacturing/construction (PR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.20). Prevalence of short sleep duration, however, was not different between blacks and whites in the retail trade industry (PR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.18) or in the accommodation/food services industry (PR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.19). Web Tables 2 and 3 display trends in the adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration in blacks compared with whites across the aforementioned industries of employment and occupations, respectively. Web Figure 2 shows a black-white comparison of age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by class of work and employment status.

Table 2.

Adjusted Prevalence Ratios of Short Sleep Duration for Blacks Compared With Whites by Industry of Employment (n = 41,088), National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2011

Industry of Employment Model 1a (Age)
Model 2b (Demographic Characteristics)
Model 3c (Health Behaviors)
Model 4d (Medical Conditions)
Model 5e (Occupational Characteristics)
PR 95% CI PR 95% CI PR 95% CI PR 95% CI PR 95% CI
Manufacturing/constructionf 1.20 1.15, 1.25 1.19 1.13, 1.25 1.20 1.14, 1.27 1.16 1.09, 1.22 1.14 1.07, 1.20
Retail trade 1.11 1.02, 1.21 1.12 1.03, 1.23 1.12 1.01, 1.24 1.07 0.96, 1.18 1.07 0.96, 1.18
Finance/information/real estateg 1.54 1.42, 1.67 1.49 1.37, 1.63 1.51 1.37, 1.67 1.44 1.31, 1.59 1.44 1.30, 1.59
Professional/administrative/managementh 1.38 1.28, 1.49 1.33 1.22, 1.45 1.39 1.26, 1.52 1.32 1.20, 1.46 1.30 1.18, 1.44
Educational services 1.60 1.48, 1.73 1.52 1.39, 1.66 1.51 1.36, 1.67 1.38 1.24, 1.53 1.39 1.25, 1.54
Health care/social assistance 1.32 1.25, 1.40 1.30 1.22, 1.38 1.31 1.22, 1.40 1.23 1.15, 1.32 1.23 1.14, 1.32
Accommodation/food services 1.06 0.96, 1.17 1.05 0.94, 1.17 1.09 0.96, 1.23 1.06 0.94, 1.20 1.05 0.93, 1.19
Public administration/arts/other servicesi 1.37 1.28, 1.46 1.39 1.29, 1.49 1.41 1.30, 1.52 1.30 1.20, 1.40 1.30 1.21, 1.41

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NAICS, North American Industrial Classification System; PR, prevalence ratio.

a Model 1 is adjusted for age categories.

b Model 2 is adjusted for age categories plus sex, marital status, educational attainment, and living in poverty.

c Model 3 is adjusted for model 2 variables plus smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.

d Model 4 is adjusted for model 3 variables plus health status, body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2), hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.

e Model 5 is adjusted model 4 variables plus class of occupation, occupation, and household income.

f Includes the following NAICS (NAICS Association, LLC, Rockaway, New Jersey) industry categories: agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; mining; utilities; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; and transportation and warehousing.

g Includes the following NAICS industry categories: information; finance and insurance; and real estate rental and leasing.

h Includes the following NAICS industry categories: professional, scientific, and technical services; management of companies and enterprises; and administrative support and waste management and remediation services industries.

i Includes the following NAICS industry categories: public administration; arts, entertainment, and recreation; and other services (except public administration).

Trends in sleep duration by industry of employment

Figure 1 illustrates temporal trends in the age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by industry of employment among both blacks and whites. Trends in short sleep prevalence were different for blacks and whites for the finance/information/real estate industry (P for interaction = 0.02) and for the professional/administrative/management industry (P for interaction = 0.04). The prevalence estimates of short sleep duration did not differ over the study period by race in any other industry. The consistently widest disparities in short sleep duration by race were observed among those in the educational services and finance/information/real estate industries.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Trends in the age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by industry of employment among blacks and whites, National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2011. A) Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; mining; utilities; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; and transportation and warehousing industries (P for interaction = 0.54; for whites, P for trend = 0.28; for blacks, P for trend = 0.65). B) Retail trade industry (P for interaction = 0.88; for whites, P for trend = 0.94; for blacks, P for trend = 0.84). C) Information; finance and insurance; and real estate rental and leasing industries (P for interaction = 0.02; for whites, P for trend = 0.55; for blacks, P for trend = 0.31). D) Professional, scientific, and technical services; management of companies and enterprises; and administrative and support and waste management and remediation services industries (P for interaction = 0.04; for whites, P for trend = 0.73; for blacks, P for trend = 0.41). E) Educational services industry (P for interaction = 0.06; for whites, P for trend = 0.90; for blacks, P for trend = 0.40). F) Health care and social assistance industry (P for interaction = 0.99; for whites, P for trend = 0.86; for blacks, P for trend = 0.45). G) Accommodation and food services industry (P for interaction = 0.10; for whites, P for trend = 0.86; for blacks, P for trend = 0.83). H) Public administration; other services; and arts, entertainment, and recreation industries (P for interaction = 0.75; for whites, P for trend = 0.32; for blacks, P for trend = 0.11). Diamonds represent whites and squares represent blacks.

Among whites in most industries (except health care/social assistance), laborers had the greatest prevalence of short sleep duration compared with individuals employed in support services or professional/administrative/management positions (see Table 3). Blacks had a consistently higher prevalence of short sleep duration than that of their white counterparts except for laborers in retail trade (for blacks, 26%; for whites, 34%) and in accommodation/food services (for blacks, 34%; for whites, 34%). Blacks in the professional/administrative/management industry category had the same prevalence of short sleep duration (38%) regardless of occupation. For blacks, the prevalence of short sleep duration was higher among professional workers compared with others in most industries; in contrast, among whites, the prevalence of short sleep duration was lower for those in professional roles compared with other occupational roles. Web Table 4 lists the prevalence of short sleep duration by occupation within industry among both black and white participants without reported diabetes, heart disease, or cancer. Furthermore, the results (main and interaction) for race and survey year by industry of employment are shown for optimal sleep duration in Web Table 5 and for short sleep duration in Web Table 6.

Table 3.

Prevalence of Short Sleep Durationa by Occupation Within Industries Overall and Among Blacks and Whites, National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2011

Occupation by Industry Blacks
Whites
Total
No. % Short Sleep Prevalence, % No. % Short Sleep Prevalence, % No. % Short Sleep Prevalence, %
Manufacturing/constructionb 39,555
 Professional/management 426 7 39 7,004 21 26 7,430 19 27
 Support services 1,100 17 40 6,959 21 27 8,059 20 28
 Laborers 4,767 76 36 19,299 58 33 24,066 61 34
Retail trade 14,678
 Professional/management 63 3 35 727 6 24 790 5 24
 Support services 1,822 78 37 9,528 77 29 11,350 77 30
 Laborers 452 19 26 2,086 17 34 2,538 17 32
Finance/information/real estatec 12,655
 Professional/management 521 29 40 3,827 35 23 4,348 34 25
 Support services 972 54 38 6,062 56 26 7,034 56 27
 Laborers 323 18 35 950 9 30 1,273 10 31
Professional/administrative/ managementd 12,586
 Professional/management 444 20 38 5,013 48 25 5,457 43 26
 Support services 736 34 38 3,279 32 26 4,015 32 28
 Laborers 1,004 46 38 2,110 20 30 3,114 25 32
Educational services 13,763
 Professional/management 208 9 45 1,204 11 26 1,412 10 28
 Support services 1,526 65 35 8,939 78 21 10,465 76 23
 Laborers 597 26 38 1,289 11 31 1,886 14 32
Health care/social assistance 17,878
 Professional/management 292 6 43 1,390 10 26 1,682 9 28
 Support services 3,624 79 40 10,925 82 29 14,549 81 31
 Laborers 692 15 35 955 7 28 1,647 9 30
Accommodation/food services 7,615
 Professional/management 120 7 42 898 15 31 1,018 13 32
 Support services 339 19 30 692 12 29 1,031 14 29
 Laborers 1,301 74 34 4,265 73 34 5,566 73 34
Public administration/arts/ other servicese 16,905
 Professional/management 581 16 42 2,814 21 26 3,395 20 28
 Support services 1,633 45 36 6,297 47 26 7,930 47 28
 Laborers 1,398 39 37 4,182 31 30 5,580 33 31
Total 24,941 110,694 135,635
 Professional/management 2,655 11 41 22,877 21 25 25,532 19 27
 Support services 11,752 47 38 52,681 48 27 64,433 48 28
 Laborers 10,534 42 36 35,136 32 32 45,670 34 33

Abbreviation: NAICS, North American Industrial Classification System.

a Weighted estimates.

b Includes the following NAICS (NAICS Association, LLC, Rockaway, New Jersey) industry categories: agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; mining; utilities; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; and transportation and warehousing.

c Includes the following NAICS industry categories: information; finance and insurance; and real estate rental and leasing.

d Includes the following NAICS industry categories: professional, scientific, and technical services; management of companies and enterprises; and administrative support and waste management and remediation services industries.

e Includes the following NAICS industry categories: public administration; arts, entertainment, and recreation; and other services (except public administration).

DISCUSSION

We found that blacks had an overall age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration that was 9 percentage points higher than that for whites, and the difference in prevalence of short sleep duration between blacks and whites varied by both industry and occupation. We also found that, for most industries, differences in the prevalence of short sleep duration between blacks and whites narrowed among laborers but increased among professional workers; therefore, the prevalence of short sleep duration was more comparable among black and white individuals with lower socioeconomic status. Specifically, the prevalence of short sleep duration generally increased with increasingly professional roles within a given industry among blacks, whereas short sleep prevalence decreased with increasing professional roles for whites. Interestingly, blacks in the professional/administrative/management industry category had the same prevalence of short sleep duration regardless of occupation, and whites who were laborers in the retail trade industry were the only group to have a higher prevalence of short sleep duration than blacks, at 34% versus 26%, respectively (Table 3).

Our study, in combination with previous investigations, suggests that population patterns of sleep duration are likely influenced by complex aspects of the social and work environments, including features that are inequitably distributed (13, 44). A previous study found a high prevalence of short sleep duration among workers in the transportation/warehousing, manufacturing, and public administration industries and identified specific occupational groups within these industries with the highest prevalence of short sleep duration (13). The study adjusted for race and did not report on black-white differences. Sleep restriction, however, is a potential source of health inequity among races and is a modifiable population health determinant that deserves further investigation.

Several potential mechanisms may connect one's job (a marker of socioeconomic position) with one's overall health, because occupation influences specific sleep conditions through power, prestige, and access to resources (45, 46). There are also pathways that likely produce racial/ethnic disparities in health, with shorter, lower quality sleep among blacks being an important contribution. For instance, occupational status is influenced by educational attainment that creates differential access to and use of information and knowledge (health-related and other), and income creates differences through differential access to quality education, as well as to material goods and services. Stress related to limited social and material resources may negatively affect sleep.

Furthermore, racial/ethnic disparities in sleep may be propagated through differential exposure to social hazards in the workplace that produce or further exacerbate stressors that impair sleep. For instance, exposure to historical and contemporary forms of discrimination/harassment in the workplace and in society may play an important role in producing psychosocial stress, in addition to job strain or limited control over job demands/prestige, as illustrated by the well-known Karasek and Theorell demand-control model (38, 4749). Additionally, shift work is more common in racial/ethnic minorities than in other groups (50, 51) and may help explain the observed racial differences in the prevalence of short sleep duration by industry and occupation, as well as the commonly observed flatter inverse gradients between some measures of socioeconomic status and various health outcomes among blacks compared with whites (52). Blacks have also been shown to have more risk factors for comorbid conditions (e.g., obesity, type 2 diabetes, sleep apnea) that may result in less, poorer quality sleep, and these health conditions have been shown to influence one's working conditions (53, 54).

With an increasing number of blacks entering into professional and management roles within any given industry, it would be useful to further investigate structural or macro-level social factors that contribute to the increasing prevalence of short sleep duration with increasingly professional roles among blacks. This is in contrast to the apparent decrease in prevalence of short sleep duration with increasingly professional roles for whites. Perhaps, the high prevalence of short sleep duration among professional blacks can be attributed, in part, to limited professional/social networks that can provide emotional and financial support, discrimination in the workplace, the perceived high work ethic needed to succeed, and/or greater levels of stress at home. An extraordinarily strong work ethic may emerge as a coping strategy in response to psychosocial and environmental stressors (e.g., career concerns, racism) when effort is not supported by potentially mitigating resources (e.g., financial and emotional support). This phenomenon is potentially damaging to health through, among other factors, shorter sleep duration, and has been referred to as John Henryism in the epidemiologic literature (5557).

Our study has several limitations. For instance, we had a cross-sectional study design and were unable to investigate prospective associations between type of employment and sleep duration. We also relied on self-reported data, including data for sleep duration, whereas actigraphy and polysomnography (the “gold standard”) would provide more objective measures (58). A previous study has shown a moderate correlation (r = 0.45) between reported and measured sleep duration and (although more research is necessary) did not find that blacks differed appreciably in their sleep duration reporting error compared with whites (58). We did not have data on the number of children (neither young nor adolescent) living in the household, which could influence sleep and could differ by race. We also did not have access to data on medication use that may affect sleepiness. Further, employment status was based on participants being employed during the week prior to the interview, which can be more variable for lower–socioeconomic status, minority groups (59); therefore, studies capable of exploring the influence of job security on sleep disparities would be particularly useful. Lastly, our occupational categories may include considerable heterogeneity and likely correlate with wealth. Our categories may also include a disproportionate number of shift workers, a variable for which we were unable to adjust, although shift work has been shown to differ by race and to negatively affect sleep (16, 32, 60).

Despite the limitations, our study has important strengths. For instance, our data were based on a large sample size with a large minority population in which robust racial, industry, and occupational stratification, as well as modification testing for a priori factors of interest, was possible. We had sleep data from 8 consecutive years, which enhanced our power to investigate sleep disparities. Also, our data are nationally representative and recently collected. We also directly estimated prevalence ratios rather than odds ratios for easier interpretation.

In conclusion, differences in short sleep duration among blacks and whites varied by industry of employment and occupation and did not appear to change over the study period. High socioeconomic status among blacks does not appear to be protective against short sleep duration, but it does for whites. These findings suggest the need for further investigation of racial/ethnic disparities in the work-sleep relationship to develop strategies for management, as well as tailored interventions that address disparities and improve sleep for optimal health among US workers.

Supplementary Material

Web Material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Author affiliations: Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Chandra L. Jackson, Frank B. Hu); Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Susan Redline, Frank B. Hu); Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Ichiro Kawachi); and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Michelle A. Williams, Frank B. Hu).

F.B.H., S.R., and C.L.J. were supported by Harvard Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer (grant 1U54CA155626-01). The funding source was not involved in the data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, or publication.

This work was presented as a poster at the 46th Annual Society for Epidemiologic Research meeting in Boston, Massachusetts, June 18–21, 2013.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Knutson KL, Van Cauter E, Rathouz PJ, et al. Trends in the prevalence of short sleepers in the USA: 1975–2006. Sleep. 2010;33(1):37–45. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Buxton OM, Marcelli E. Short and long sleep are positively associated with obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease among adults in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(5):1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hammond EC. Some preliminary findings on physical complaints from a prospective study of 1,064,004 men and women. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964;54:11–23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gangwisch JE, Heymsfield SB, Boden-Albala B, et al. Sleep duration associated with mortality in elderly, but not middle-aged, adults in a large US sample. Sleep. 2008;31(8):1087–1096. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gangwisch JE, Heymsfield SB, Boden-Albala B, et al. Sleep duration as a risk factor for diabetes incidence in a large U.S. sample. Sleep. 2007;30(12):1667–1673. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.12.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gottlieb DJ, Punjabi NM, Newman AB, et al. Association of sleep time with diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(8):863–867. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.8.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gottlieb DJ, Redline S, Nieto FJ, et al. Association of usual sleep duration with hypertension: the Sleep Heart Health Study. Sleep. 2006;29(8):1009–1014. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.8.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alvarez GG, Ayas NT. The impact of daily sleep duration on health: a review of the literature. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19(2):56–59. doi: 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2004.02422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ayas NT, White DP, Al-Delaimy WK, et al. A prospective study of self-reported sleep duration and incident diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(2):380–384. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Steptoe A, Peacey V, Wardle J. Sleep duration and health in young adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(16):1689–1692. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.16.1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taheri S, Lin L, Austin D, et al. Short sleep duration is associated with reduced leptin, elevated ghrelin, and increased body mass index. PLoS Med. 2004;1(3):e62. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grandner MA, Hale L, Moore M, et al. Mortality associated with short sleep duration: the evidence, the possible mechanisms, and the future. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14(3):191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Luckhaupt SE, Tak S, Calvert GM. The prevalence of short sleep duration by industry and occupation in the National Health Interview Survey. Sleep. 2010;33(2):149–159. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kuhn P, Lozano F. The expanding workweek? Understanding trends in long work hours among U.S. men, 1979–2004. J Labor Econ. 2008;26(2):311–343. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tucker P, Smith L, Macdonald I, et al. The impact of early and late shift changeovers on sleep, health, and well-being in 8- and 12-hour shift systems. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3(3):265–275. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.3.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pilcher JJ, Lambert BJ, Huffcutt AI. Differential effects of permanent and rotating shifts on self-report sleep length: a meta-analytic review. Sleep. 2000;23(2):155–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ota A, Masue T, Yasuda N, et al. Association between psychosocial job characteristics and insomnia: an investigation using two relevant job stress models—the demand-control-support (DCS) model and the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model. Sleep Med. 2005;6(4):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruggiero JS, Redeker NS. Effects of napping on sleepiness and sleep-related performance deficits in night-shift workers: a systematic review [published online ahead of print February 13, 2013] Biol Res Nurs. 2013 doi: 10.1177/1099800413476571. ( doi:10.1177/1099800413476571) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Costa G. The 24-hour society between myth and reality. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 2001;30(1-2):15–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Presser HB. Toward a 24-hour economy. Science. 1999;284(5421):1778–1779. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nunes J, Jean-Louis G, Zizi F, et al. Sleep duration among black and white Americans: results of the National Health Interview Survey. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(3):317–322. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ruiter ME, Decoster J, Jacobs L, et al. Normal sleep in African-Americans and Caucasian-Americans: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2011;12(3):209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hale L, Do DP. Racial differences in self-reports of sleep duration in a population-based study. Sleep. 2007;30(9):1096–1103. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.9.1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Durrence HH, Lichstein KL. The sleep of African Americans: a comparative review. Behav Sleep Med. 2006;4(1):29–44. doi: 10.1207/s15402010bsm0401_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Krueger PM, Friedman EM. Sleep duration in the United States: a cross-sectional population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(9):1052–1063. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Thomas KS, Bardwell WA, Ancoli-Israel S, et al. The toll of ethnic discrimination on sleep architecture and fatigue. Health Psychol. 2006;25(5):635–642. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tomfohr L, Pung MA, Edwards KM, et al. Racial differences in sleep architecture: the role of ethnic discrimination. Biol Psychol. 2012;89(1):34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zizi F, Pandey A, Murrray-Bachmann R, et al. Race/ethnicity, sleep duration, and diabetes mellitus: analysis of the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Med. 2012;125(2):162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stepnowsky CJ, Jr, Moore PJ, Dimsdale JE. Effect of ethnicity on sleep: complexities for epidemiologic research. Sleep. 2003;26(3):329–332. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.3.329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spiegel K, Tasali E, Penev P, et al. Brief communication: sleep curtailment in healthy young men is associated with decreased leptin levels, elevated ghrelin levels, and increased hunger and appetite. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(11):846–850. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spiegel K, Leproult R, L'Hermite-Baleriaux M, et al. Leptin levels are dependent on sleep duration: relationships with sympathovagal balance, carbohydrate regulation, cortisol, and thyrotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(11):5762–5771. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ertel KA, Berkman LF, Buxton OM. Socioeconomic status, occupational characteristics, and sleep duration in African/Caribbean immigrants and US white health care workers. Sleep. 2011;34(4):509–518. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.4.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harma M, Tenkanen L, Sjoblom T, et al. Combined effects of shift work and life-style on the prevalence of insomnia, sleep deprivation and daytime sleepiness. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998;24(4):300–307. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rao U, Poland RE, Lutchmansingh P, et al. Relationship between ethnicity and sleep patterns in normal controls: implications for psychopathology and treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 1999;33(5):419–426. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(99)00019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stamatakis KA, Kaplan GA, Roberts RE. Short sleep duration across income, education, and race/ethnic groups: population prevalence and growing disparities during 34 years of follow-up. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(12):948–955. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.07.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kmec JA, Trimble LB. Does it pay to have a network contact? Social network ties, workplace racial context, and pay outcomes. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(2):266–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hughes D, Dodge MA. African American women in the workplace: relationships between job conditions, racial bias at work, and perceived job quality. Am J Community Psychol. 1997;25(5):581–599. doi: 10.1023/a:1024630816168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grandner MA, Hale L, Jackson N, et al. Perceived racial discrimination as an independent predictor of sleep disturbance and daytime fatigue. Behav Sleep Med. 2012;10(4):235–249. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2012.654548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. National Health Interview Survey http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. (Accessed June 10, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Voss U, Tuin I. Integration of immigrants into a new culture is related to poor sleep quality. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:61. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wolters KM. Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics. 1992;48(2):577–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):60–76. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shavers VL. Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(9):1013–1023. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Berkman LF, Macintyre S. The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. IARC Sci Publ. 1997;(138):51–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hall MH, Matthews KA, Kravitz HM, et al. Race and financial strain are independent correlates of sleep in midlife women: the SWAN Sleep Study. Sleep. 2009;32(1):73–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Karasek RA, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Krieger N, Waterman PD, Hartman C, et al. Social hazards on the job: workplace abuse, sexual harassment, and racial discrimination—a study of black, Latino, and white low-income women and men workers in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(1):51–85. doi: 10.2190/3EMB-YKRH-EDJ2-0H19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lieu SJ, Curhan GC, Schernhammer ES, et al. Rotating night shift work and disparate hypertension risk in African-Americans. J Hypertens. 2012;30(1):61–66. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834e1ea3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Presser HB. Race-ethnic and gender differences in nonstandard work shifts. Work Occup. 2003;30:412–439. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(1 suppl):186S–196S. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.166082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mensah GA, Mokdad AH, Ford ES, et al. State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States. Circulation. 2005;111(10):1233–1241. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158136.76824.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Villaneuva AT, Buchanan PR, Yee BJ, et al. Ethnicity and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med Rev. 2005;9(6):419–436. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Markovic N, Bunker CH, Ukoli FA, et al. John Henryism and blood pressure among Nigerian civil servants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(3):186–190. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.3.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Flaskerud JH. Coping and health status: John Henryism. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33(10):712–715. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.673695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.James SA. John Henryism and the health of African-Americans. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1994;18(2):163–182. doi: 10.1007/BF01379448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lauderdale DS, Knutson KL, Yan LL, et al. Self-reported and measured sleep duration: How similar are they? Epidemiology. 2008;19(6):838–845. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318187a7b0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Muntaner C, Hadden WC, Kravets N. Social class, race/ethnicity and all-cause mortality in the US: longitudinal results from the 1986–1994 National Health Interview Survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):777–784. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036569.39399.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ohayon MM, Smolensky MH, Roth T. Consequences of shiftworking on sleep duration, sleepiness, and sleep attacks. Chronobiol Int. 2010;27(3):575–589. doi: 10.3109/07420521003749956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web Material

Articles from American Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES