Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2014 Jan 13;4:412. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00412

Endosomal pH in neuronal signaling and synaptic transmission: role of Na+/H+ exchanger NHE5

Graham H Diering 1, Masayuki Numata 2,*
PMCID: PMC3888932  PMID: 24454292

Abstract

Neuronal precursor cells extend multiple neurites during development, one of which extends to form an axon whereas others develop into dendrites. Chemical stimulation of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in fully-differentiated neurons induces projection of dendritic spines, small spikes protruding from dendrites, thereby establishing another layer of polarity within the dendrite. Neuron-enriched Na+/H+ exchanger NHE5 contributes to both neurite growth and dendritic spine formation. In resting neurons and neuro-endocrine cells, neuron-enriched NHE5 is predominantly associated with recycling endosomes where it colocalizes with nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor TrkA. NHE5 potently acidifies the lumen of TrkA-positive recycling endosomes and regulates cell-surface targeting of TrkA, whereas chemical stimulation of NMDA receptors rapidly recruits NHE5 to dendritic spines, alkalinizes dendrites and down-regulates the dendritic spine formation. Possible roles of NHE5 in neuronal signaling via proton movement in subcellular compartments are discussed.

Keywords: NMDA receptor, neurotrophins, Trk receptors, signaling endosomes, endocytic recycling, neurites, dendritic spines, protons

Introduction

A robust fluctuation in pHi (pH inside of the cell, or cytosolic pH) and pHo (pH outside of the cell or extracellular pH) greatly influence synaptic transmission, which is often associated with pathological conditions (Velisek, 1998; Hsu et al., 2000; Chesler, 2003). For example, seizure leads to interstitial acidification of hippocampal neurons (Somjen, 1984) and excessive acidosis inhibits synaptic transmission and eventually causes coma (Li and Siesjö, 1997), while alkalinization may induce seizures (Schuchmann et al., 2006). Conversely, strong synaptic stimulation initiates a series of changes in pHo in the vicinity of the synapse beginning with an immediate acidification lasting a few milliseconds followed by a slower alkaline transient for several 100 ms (Chesler and Kaila, 1992). Epileptiform activity induced by low-Mg2+ was suppressed by acidic media (Velisek et al., 1994). While global changes in pHi and pHo may cause perilous effects on neuronal functions, transient (e.g., during neuronal development, in response to neuronal stimuli) and localized changes in pH in subcellular compartments (e.g., neuronal synapses and endosomal lumens) occur under non-pathological states and regulate neurological function.

Most of glutamate receptors including N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors (Ihle and Patneau, 2000), Kainate receptors (Mott et al., 2003), and the group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (Levinthal et al., 2009) are down-regulated by extracellular protons. Among them, NMDA receptors are particularly sensitive to extracellular protons because of the physiological pKa of 7.3–7.5 (Tang et al., 1990; Traynelis and Cull-Candy, 1990; Banke et al., 2005). Given the importance of NMDA receptors for synaptic plasticity, this suggests that local pH in the vicinity of the synapse may be important for the induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Consistent with this notion, high-frequency stimulation of axon projections from the hippocampus CA3 region, termed Schaffer collaterals, failed to induce LTP in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons when the cells were bathed in an acidified media, likely a result of NMDA receptor inhibition (Velisek, 1998). pHo changes at the confined space of synaptic cleft may coordinate synaptic excitability by synergistically regulating excitatory and inhibitory receptors of post-synaptic neurons in a reciprocal manner. The best-studied pHo-sensitive ion translocating mechanism would be Acid Sensing Ion Channels (ASICs), proton-gated ion channels predominantly expressed in the nervous system, which are involved in pain, seizure, stroke and anxiety-related neurological disorders (Wemmie et al., 2008; Gründer and Chen, 2010; Zha, 2013). Acidic pHo facilitates the chloride conductance of certain gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors, which inhibits firing of action potentials (Krishek et al., 1996; Dietrich and Morad, 2010). It has been also suggested that the pre-synaptic K+-current is regulated by pHo (Almanza et al., 2008).

Endosomes are membrane-bound orgaenelles that internalize membrane components and external molecules. Internalized vesicles are delivered to lysosomes for degradation or return to the plasma membrane via endocytic recycling pathways (Maxfield and Mcgraw, 2004). The endosomal lumen is acidic (Casey et al., 2010; Scott and Gruenberg, 2011), which is established by Vacuolar proton-translocating ATPases (V-ATPases) and the counter-ion conductance by anion channels/transporters such as the Cl− channel and Cl−/H+ exchanger ClC family (Forgac, 2007; Stauber and Jentsch, 2013). Anion channels/transporters relieve the charge-imbalance by pumping anions into the lumen and facilitate continuous action of V-ATPases to pump protons to the lumen. In neurons and neuroendocrine cells, the neuron-enriched Na+/H+ exchanger NHE5 seems to play an equally important role as V-ATPases. A unique aspect of NHE5 is that it acts in both endosomes and synapses. We discuss the potential role of proton concentration oscillations by NHE5 in neuronal signaling.

Na+/H+ exchangers in neurons

Na+/H+ exchangers (NHEs) are a group of secondary active antiporters that typically exchange extracellular Na+ for cytosolic protons in a 1:1 ratio, thereby regulating cellular pH and cell volume (Aronson, 1985; Wakabayashi et al., 1997; Orlowski and Grinstein, 2004; Slepkov et al., 2007). The recovery from acute acidification in biochemically-isolated synapses requires external Na+ whereas HCO−3 deprivation or inhibitors against bicarbonate transporters also affect pHi of some neurons (Sauvaigo et al., 1984; Nachshen and Drapeau, 1988; Chesler, 2003). Although Na+-driven Cl−-HCO−3 exchange activity was detected in freshly dissociated hippocampal neurons (Schwiening and Boron, 1994) and some neuronal cell populations may require bicarbonate-dependent pH regulation mechanisms, Na+-dependent recovery from acute cytosolic acidification occurs even in bicarbonate-free media (Raley-Susman et al., 1991). Thus, NHEs play crucial roles in pH regulation in neurons while HCO−3 is also likely an important pH regulator of certain types of neurons. NHE-activity indeed regulates synaptic transmission at glutamatergic, GABAergic and dopaminergic synapses (Trudeau et al., 1999; Jang et al., 2006; Rocha et al., 2008; Dietrich and Morad, 2010) and there is evidence suggesting that local pH contributes to the induction and maintenance of LTP (Velisek, 1998; Ronicke et al., 2009; Diering et al., 2011). In mammals, nine NHE isoforms NHE1-NHE9 have been characterized as secondary active ion transporters (Brett et al., 2005; Donowitz et al., 2013). NHE1-NHE5 are functionally well-defined NHEs that exhibit the typical Na+-H+ exchange activity, of which ubiquitously expressed NHE1 and neuron-enriched NHE5 are the two predominant isoforms in the brain (Attaphitaya et al., 1999; Baird et al., 1999). NHE6-NHE9 exhibit “atypical” cation non-specific organellar activity across acidic organellar membranes (Orlowski and Grinstein, 2007; Ohgaki et al., 2011) therefore referred to as CNO-NHEs. Since CNO-NHEs have a higher affinity to K+ than Na+, their physiological mode of action is likely to “leak” protons from the lumen of acidic organelles driven by the influx of K+, the major cytosolic monovalent cation. The unique cation-nonspecific antiporter activity was reported first in NHE7 in a heterologous expression system (Numata and Orlowski, 2001) and a similar activity was subsequently detected in other CNO-NHEs in an in vitro reconstitution system (Nakamura et al., 2005). More recent studies showed that genetic depletion of NHE6 leads to endosomal acidification (Ohgaki et al., 2010; Xinhan et al., 2011; Ouyang et al., 2013) in neuronal and non-neuronal cells, supporting the physiological relevance of CNO-NHEs for proton-leak from acidic organelles. Although widely expressed in most mammalian cell types, genetic alterations in NHE6, NHE7, and NHE9 have been associated with X-linked mental retardation syndrome (Gilfillan et al., 2008; Schroer et al., 2010; Takahashi et al., 2011; Mignot et al., 2013), late-onset Alzheimer's disease (Meda et al., 2012), and autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity spectrum disorder (ADHD) (Lasky-Su et al., 2008; Morrow et al., 2008; Markunas et al., 2010; Mick et al., 2010), respectively.

NHE1 null-mice exhibit neurological phenotypes including epileptic-like seizures resulting from enhanced neuronal excitability and loss of Purkinje cells in cerebellum (Cox et al., 1997; Liu et al., 2013), but otherwise brain development occurs without major complications. This suggests that while selected neurons such as Purkinje cells are particularly sensitive to pH changes, other neurons possess distinct mechanisms to defend against a pH challenge. Unique NHE-activity distinct from NHE1 has been detected in hippocampal neurons, which is relatively insensitive to amiloride, highly sensitive to ATP-depletion and has a high affinity to Li+ (Raley-Susman et al., 1991; Schwiening and Boron, 1994; Baxter and Church, 1996). NHE5 is ~100-fold more resistant to amiloride than NHE1 (Masereel et al., 2003) and has a higher affinity to Li+ than NHE1 (Szabo et al., 2000). Moreover, ATP-depletion almost completely abolishes NHE5 activity (Szabo et al., 2000) whereas NHE1 is only partially suppressed by ATP-depletion (Kapus et al., 1994). Thus, NHE5 is most likely the responsible molecule for non-NHE1 type NHE activity physiologically detected in hippocampal neurons. The highly ATP-sensitive nature implies a possible role of NHE5 in pathological processes such as ischemia and reperfusion. While NHE5 is predominantly associated with recycling endosomes and potently acidifies the lumen in resting neuroendocrine model cells (Diering et al., 2013), it is acutely targeted to dendritic spines upon neuronal activation [(Diering et al., 2011) and see below]. Movement of protons from the cytosol to the endosomal lumen via NHE5 should theoretically affect the global cytosolic pH (pHi), however this depends on a number of other factors including the volume of recycling endosomes and the buffering power, and the actual effect of NHE5 on the overall cytosolic pH is not clear. Currently NHE5 knockout mice are not available. In summary, currently available data suggest that ubiquitous Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1, neuron-enriched NHE5 and CNO-NHEs across organellar membranes are the three major NHEs in neurons.

Local pH modulates dendritic spine morphology

Most forms of LTP require activation of synaptic NMDA receptors (NMDARs) (Malenka and Bear, 2004) and subsequent calcium influx. This initiates a signaling program that eventually recruits AMPA receptor to synapses (Shepherd and Huganir, 2007) and facilitates the formation of dendritic spines (Engert and Bonhoeffer, 1999; Maletic-Savatic et al., 1999; Lang et al., 2004; Matsuzaki et al., 2004). NMDARs have especially high proton sensitivity with a pKa of 7.3–7.5 (Tang et al., 1990; Traynelis and Cull-Candy, 1990) due to a discrete extracellular proton binding site distinct from other ligand binding sites (Banke et al., 2005). The proton binding site is associated with the channel gating mechanism such that channel open probability is strongly suppressed by proton binding. Unlike the voltage-dependent block of NMDARs by Mg2+ ions (Nowak et al., 1984; Kumamoto, 1996), this proton block is not dependent on voltage. Thus, at resting extracellular pH close to 7.3, a tonic proton block exists, which maintains NMDAR-activity to about 50%, which means that any slight deviation in local pH should theoretically have a profound impact on synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity. Therefore, synaptic pH-regulating ion transporters like NHE5 may contribute to a pH-based inhibitory tone to limit synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity.

Under basal conditions, NHE5 is predominantly localized to recycling endosomes. Within minutes following NMDAR activation by co-agonist glycine, NHE5 is recruited into dendritic spines and exposed onto the cell surface at excitatory synapses. Stimulation of NMDARs by glycine is often referred to as “chemical LTP” because this manipulation induces long-lasting mEPSC, which is mediated by AMPA receptor components (mEPSCAMPA) and is inhibited by NMDAR inhibitors (Lu et al., 2001). Dendritic spines then undergo an NHE5-dependent alkaline shift in their pHi as NHE5 transports cytosolic protons into the extracellular space (Diering et al., 2011). A model is proposed in which NHE5 targeted to dendritic spines by NMDAR-activation acutely mobilizes protons across the post-synaptic membrane, which in turn down-regulates NMDAR, thereby forming a negative-feedback loop (Figure 1). As neurological disorders such as depression, schizophrenia and autism are associated with aberrant NMDAR activity and dendritic spine morphogenesis (Lakhan et al., 2013; Zhou and Sheng, 2013), it is tempting to speculate that NHE5 may be involved in pathogenic processes of these diseases. Recently, Deane and colleagues reported that chemical LTP enhances translocation of NHE6 to dendrites in mouse hippocampal neurons (Deane et al., 2013), resembling the targeting behavior of NHE5 in rat hippocampal neurons (Diering et al., 2011). Small populations of CNO-NHEs are indeed targeted to the plasma membrane in non-neuronal cells (Lin et al., 2007; Kagami et al., 2008; Ohgaki et al., 2008; Onishi et al., 2012) and in vestibular hair cells (Hill et al., 2006); however, whether CNO-NHEs transiently delivered to the plasma membrane exhibit (Na+, K+)/H+ exchange activity remains to be determined. Another important unanswered question is whether NHE6 participates in activity-dependent pH regulation of dendritic spines. Future investigations are needed to address these important mechanistic questions. Curiously, acid-sensing ion channel ASIC1a is present in dendritic spines, serves as a pH-sensor and influences the density of spines (Zha et al., 2006), raising an interesting possibility that ASIC1 in dendritic spines may be regulated by NHE5 and possibly NHE6.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Model of endosomal and synaptic functions of NHE5. At steady state, NHE5 is primarily associated with recycling endosomes, where it acts to acidify the lumen of this compartment. Upon activation of NMDA receptors, recycling endosomes containing NHE5 and Trk receptors are mobilized and recruited to active synapses. One possibility is that signaling downstream of NMDA receptors acutely stimulates NHE5 activity in the endosomal membrane, driving endosomal acidification and promoting endosomal recycling. Following insertion, NHE5 is active on plasma membrane, acting to supress further NMDA receptor activity through localized acidification of the synaptic cleft. In addition, active NHE5 can support the surface expression of Trk receptors and enhance AKT signaling from recycling endosomes. These coordinated activities may help the synapse transition from an initiation phase of LTP into a consolidation phase, limiting excitotoxicity from sustained NMDA receptor activation while promoting synapse strengthening through local neurotrophin signaling.

Endosomal acidity in Trk targeting and signaling

Binding of neurotrophins [e.g., nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3] to their high affinity TrkA, TrkB and TrkC stimulates downstream signaling, leading to neuronal differentiation and survival (Huang and Reichardt, 2001; Chao, 2003). Vectorial targeting of the NGF-receptor TrkA from the endosomal pool to growing neurite tips serves as a regulatory mechanism for neurotrophin signaling (Arimura et al., 2009; Vaegter et al., 2011) and neurite outgrowth (Ascano et al., 2009). Similarly, endocytic recycling recruits TrkB to the post-synaptic density during LTP that is required for dendritic branching (Huang et al., 2013; Lazo et al., 2013). Thus, endocytic recycling not only regulates the cell-surface availability of Trk proteins but also provides the accurate targeting path to neurites.

Rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, widely used as a neuroendocrine model (Greene and Tischler, 1976), have more acidic recycling endosomal pH of ~6.2 (Diering et al., 2013) than recycling endosomal pH of ~6.5 in fibroblasts (Maxfield and Mcgraw, 2004; Scott and Gruenberg, 2011). NHE5-depletion by shRNA or V-ATPase-inhibition by Bafilomycin lead to a similar degree of alkalinization of recycling endosomes to pH = ~6.5 in PC12 cells, whereas concomitant inhibition of NHE5 and V-ATPase further alkalinizes recycling endosomes to pH = ~6.75. These results indicate that NHE5 acidifies recycling endosomes as potently as V-ATPases in PC12 cells. NHE5 and TrkA colocalize intracellularly by double immunofluorescence microscopy and NHE5-depletion reduces cell-surface targeting of TrkA, and impairs NGF-induced neurite formation; while V-ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin has also decreased the cell-surface population of TrkA (Diering et al., 2013). Importantly, NHE5 depletion as well as V-ATPase inhibition has impaired endocytic recycling of TrkA but not transferrin receptor (TfnR) or Na+/K+-ATPase. These results suggest that endosomal acidification is important in the polarized targeting of specific endosomal cargoes in PC12 cells. It was recently reported that NHE6 deletion impairs neurotrophin signaling and affects axonal and dendritic branching of hippocampal neurons (Ouyang et al., 2013). Genetic depletion leads to excessive acidification of late endo-lysosomes and facilitates degradation of TrkB, which in turn decreases responsiveness to BDNF. However, a significant population of NHE6 seems to be associated with recycling endosomes and other yet-to-be identified intracellular compartments (Ouyang et al., 2013). NHE6 depletion was shown to acidify recycling endosomal pH in HeLa cells (Xinhan et al., 2011) and hepatocytes (Ohgaki et al., 2010), and NHE6 in hepatocytes affects polarized distribution of membrane lipids to the apical surface. Taken together, it is possible that NHE6 in neurons regulates endocytic recycling of TrkB. We suggest that the balanced action of NHE5, NHE6 and perhaps other CNO-NHEs in different organelles along the endocytic and recycling pathway is needed for proper targeting of Trk proteins, and impairment of any of their function may affect neurotrophin signaling.

Although both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) signaling pathways are downstream of NGF-TrkA, PI3K-Akt signaling seems to be more severely affected by luminal alkalinization, suggesting that endosomal pH may directly influence PI3K-Akt signaling in addition to its role in TrkA targeting. Indeed, Akt signaling occurs in endosomes in various cell types (Garcia-Regalado et al., 2008; Schenck et al., 2008; Walz et al., 2010; Nazarewicz et al., 2011) including NGF-treated PC12 cells (Lin et al., 2006; Varsano et al., 2006). Endosomes provide a confined space that allows for continuous signaling from the internalized ligand-receptor complex (Gould and Lippincott-Schwartz, 2009; Murphy et al., 2009; Platta and Stenmark, 2011) and certain signaling may arise in endosomes (Sorkin and von Zastrow, 2009; Scita and Di Fiore, 2010). Thus, although the plasma membrane is undoubtedly the most important cellular location for the initial activation of PI3K-Akt signaling, sustained signaling does occur in endosomes where pH may modulate the signaling intensity.

Trk neurotrophin receptors are likely associated with diverse endosomal populations. Aside from the recycling endosomal (Diering et al., 2013) and late endosomal pH (Ouyang et al., 2013), early endosomal pH has been suggested to influence neurotrophin signaling by modulating the neurotrophin-receptor binding and cell-surface targeting that is mediated by a small GTPase Rac1 and coffilins (Harrington et al., 2011). As such, it is possible that non-selective perturbation of all the acidic compartments by Bafilomycin or weak alkaline agents may lead to mixed biological effects. In future studies, it will be important to dissect the precise role of pH in different organellar compartments in neurotrophin signaling.

Concluding remarks

Compelling experimental evidence suggests that synaptic functions are tightly controlled by endocytic recycling (Park et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2008). While the importance of pH in localized electrical activity, cell signaling and vesicular trafficking is well recognized, the molecular basis underlying compartmentalized pH regulation in neurons has been lacking. We now suggest that the recycling plasma membrane type NHE5 in neuroendocrine and neuronal cells potently acidifies recycling endosomes and modulates signaling events occurring in endosomes and synapses. Though still in its early stage, NHE5 offers an example of how localized pH regulation can impact synaptic plasticity and neuronal differentiation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Graham H. Diering is a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) postdoctoral scholar. We thank Dr. Sarah Cohen (NIH) and Dr. Yuka Numata (UBC) for their critical reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. Almanza A., Mercado F., Vega R., Soto E. (2008). Extracellular pH modulates the voltage-dependent Ca2+ current and low threshold K+ current in hair cells. Neurochem. Res. 33, 1435–1441 10.1007/s11064-007-9565-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arimura N., Kimura T., Nakamuta S., Taya S., Funahashi Y., Hattori A., et al. (2009). Anterograde transport of TrkB in axons is mediated by direct interaction with Slp1 and Rab27. Dev. Cell 16, 675–686 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronson P. S. (1985). Kinetic properties of the plasma membrane Na+-H+ exchanger. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47, 545–560 10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.002553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ascano M., Richmond A., Borden P., Kuruvilla R. (2009). Axonal targeting of Trk receptors via transcytosis regulates sensitivity to neurotrophin responses. J. Neurosci. 29, 11674–11685 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1542-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Attaphitaya S., Park K., Melvin J. E. (1999). Molecular cloning and functional expression of a rat Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE5) highly expressed in brain. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4383–4388 10.1074/jbc.274.7.4383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baird N. R., Orlowski J., Szabo E. Z., Zaun H. C., Schultheis P. J., Menon A. G., et al. (1999). Molecular cloning, genomic organization, and functional expression of Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 5 (NHE5) from human brain. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4377–4382 10.1074/jbc.274.7.4377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Banke T. G., Dravid S. M., Traynelis S. F. (2005). Protons trap NR1/NR2B NMDA receptors in a nonconducting state. J. Neurosci. 25, 42–51 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3154-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baxter K. A., Church J. (1996). Characterization of acid extrusion mechanisms in cultured fetal rat hippocampal neurones. J. Physiol. 493 (pt 2), 457–470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brett C. L., Donowitz M., Rao R. (2005). Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 288, C223–C239 10.1152/ajpcell.00360.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Casey J. R., Grinstein S., Orlowski J. (2010). Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 50–61 10.1038/nrm2820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chao M. V. (2003). Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 299–309 10.1038/nrn1078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chesler M. (2003). Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain. Physiol. Rev. 83, 1183–1221 10.1152/physrev.00010.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chesler M., Kaila K. (1992). Modulation of pH by neuronal activity. Trends Neurosci. 15, 396–402 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90191-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox G. A., Lutz C. M., Yang C. L., Biemesderfer D., Bronson R. T., Fu A., et al. (1997). Sodium/hydrogen exchanger gene defect in slow-wave epilepsy mutant mice. Cell 91, 139–148 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)80016-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deane E. C., Ilie A. E., Sizdahkhani S., Das Gupta M., Orlowski J., Mckinney R. A. (2013). Enhanced recruitment of endosomal Na+/H+ Exchanger NHE6 into dendritic spines of hippocampal pyramidal neurons during NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 33, 595–610 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2583-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Diering G. H., Mills F., Bamji S. X., Numata M. (2011). Regulation of dendritic spine growth through activity-dependent recruitment of the brain-enriched Na+/H+ exchanger NHE5. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2246–2257 10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Diering G. H., Numata Y., Fan S., Church J., Numata M. (2013). Endosomal acidification by Na+/H+ exchanger NHE5 regulates TrkA cell-surface targeting and NGF-induced PI3K signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3435–3448 10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietrich C. J., Morad M. (2010). Synaptic acidification enhances GABAA signaling. J. Neurosci. 30, 16044–16052 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6364-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Donowitz M., Ming Tse C., Fuster D. (2013). SLC9/NHE gene family, a plasma membrane and organellar family of Na+/H+ exchangers. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 236–251 10.1016/j.mam.2012.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Engert F., Bonhoeffer T. (1999). Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature 399, 66–70 10.1038/19978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Forgac M. (2007). Vacuolar ATPases: rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 917–929 10.1038/nrm2272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia-Regalado A., Guzman-Hernandez M. L., Ramirez-Rangel I., Robles-Molina E., Balla T., Vazquez-Prado J., et al. (2008). G protein-coupled receptor-promoted trafficking of Gbeta1gamma2 leads to AKT activation at endosomes via a mechanism mediated by Gbeta1gamma2-Rab11a interaction. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4188–4200 10.1091/mbc.E07-10-1089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilfillan G. D., Selmer K. K., Roxrud I., Smith R., Kyllerman M., Eiklid K., et al. (2008). SLC9A6 mutations cause X-linked mental retardation, microcephaly, epilepsy, and ataxia, a phenotype mimicking Angelman syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82, 1003–1010 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gould G. W., Lippincott-Schwartz J. (2009). New roles for endosomes: from vesicular carriers to multi-purpose platforms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 287–292 10.1038/nrm2652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Greene L. A., Tischler A. S. (1976). Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 2424–2428 10.1073/pnas.73.7.2424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gründer S., Chen X. (2010). Structure, function, and pharmacology of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs): focus on ASIC1a. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 2, 73 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrington A. W., St Hillaire C., Zweifel L. S., Glebova N. O., Philippidou P., Halegoua S., et al. (2011). Recruitment of actin modifiers to TrkA endosomes governs retrograde NGF signaling and survival. Cell 146, 421–434 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hill J. K., Brett C. L., Chyou A., Kallay L. M., Sakaguchi M., Rao R., et al. (2006). Vestibular hair bundles control pH with (Na+, K+)/H+ exchangers NHE6 and NHE9. J. Neurosci. 26, 9944–9955 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2990-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hsu K. S., Liang Y. C., Huang C. C. (2000). Influence of an extracellular acidosis on excitatory synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. J. Neurosci. Res. 62, 403–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang E. J., Reichardt L. F. (2001). Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 677–736 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huang S.-H., Wang J., Sui W.-H., Chen B., Zhang X.-Y., Yan J., et al. (2013). BDNF-dependent recycling facilitates TrkB translocation to postsynaptic density during LTP via a Rab11-Dependent pathway. J. Neurosci. 33, 9214–9230 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3256-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ihle E. C., Patneau D. K. (2000). Modulation of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor desensitization by extracellular protons. Mol. Pharmacol. 58, 1204–1212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jang I. S., Brodwick M. S., Wang Z. M., Jeong H. J., Choi B. J., Akaike N. (2006). The Na+/H+ exchanger is a major pH regulator in GABAergic presynaptic nerve terminals synapsing onto rat CA3 pyramidal neurons. J. Neurochem. 99, 1224–1236 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04168.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kagami T., Chen S., Memar P., Choi M., Foster L. J., Numata M. (2008). Identification and biochemical characterization of the SLC9A7 interactome. Mol. Membr. Biol. 25, 436–447 10.1080/09687680802263046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kapus A., Grinstein S., Wasan S., Kandasamy R., Orlowski J. (1994). Functional characterization of three isoforms of the Na+/H+ exchanger stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. ATP dependence, osmotic sensitivity, and role in cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23544–23552 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Krishek B. J., Amato A., Connolly C. N., Moss S. J., Smart T. G. (1996). Proton sensitivity of the GABA(A) receptor is associated with the receptor subunit composition. J. Physiol. 492 (pt 2), 431–443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumamoto E. (1996). Neuromodulation by Mg2+ and polyamines of excitatory amino acid currents in rodent neurones in culture. Magnes. Res. 9, 317–327 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lakhan S. E., Caro M., Hadzimichalis N. (2013). NMDA receptor activity in neuropsychiatric disorders. Front. Psychiatry 4:52 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lang C., Barco A., Zablow L., Kandel E. R., Siegelbaum S. A., Zakharenko S. S. (2004). Transient expansion of synaptically connected dendritic spines upon induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16665–16670 10.1073/pnas.0407581101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lasky-Su J., Anney R. J., Neale B. M., Franke B., Zhou K., Maller J. B., et al. (2008). Genome-wide association scan of the time to onset of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 147B, 1355–1358 10.1002/ajmg.b.30869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lazo O. M., Gonzalez A. S., Ascano M., Kuruvilla R., Couve A. S., Bronfman F. C. (2013). BDNF regulates Rab11-Mediated recycling endosome dynamics to induce dendritic branching. J. Neurosci. 33, 6112–6122 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4630-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Levinthal C., Barkdull L., Jacobson P., Storjohann L., van Wagenen B. C., Stormann T. M., et al. (2009). Modulation of group III metabotropic glutamate receptors by hydrogen ions. Pharmacology 83, 88–94 10.1159/000180124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li P.-A., Siesjö B. K. (1997). Role of hyperglycaemia-related acidosis in ischaemic brain damage. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 161, 567–580 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1997.00264.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lin D. C., Quevedo C., Brewer N. E., Bell A., Testa J. R., Grimes M. L., et al. (2006). APPL1 associates with TrkA and GIPC1 and is required for nerve growth factor-mediated signal transduction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 8928–8941 10.1128/MCB.00228-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin P. J., Williams W. P., Kobiljski J., Numata M. (2007). Caveolins bind to (Na+, K+)/H+ exchanger NHE7 by a novel binding module. Cell Signal. 19, 978–988 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Liu Y., Zaun H. C., Orlowski J., Ackerman S. L. (2013). CHP1-Mediated NHE1 biosynthetic maturation is required for purkinje cell axon homeostasis. J. Neurosci. 33, 12656–12669 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0406-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lu W.-Y., Man H.-Y., Ju W., Trimble W. S., MacDonald J. F., Wang Y. T. (2001). Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron 29, 243–254 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00194-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Malenka R. C., Bear M. F. (2004). LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 44, 5–21 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Maletic-Savatic M., Malinow R., Svoboda K. (1999). Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity. Science 283, 1923–1927 10.1126/science.283.5409.1923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Markunas C. A., Quinn K. S., Collins A. L., Garrett M. E., Lachiewicz A. M., Sommer J. L., et al. (2010). Genetic variants in SLC9A9 are associated with measures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in families. Psychiatr. Genet. 20, 73–81 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283351209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Masereel B., Pochet L., Laeckmann D. (2003). An overview of inhibitors of Na+/H+ exchanger. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 38, 547–554 10.1016/S0223-5234(03)00100-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Matsuzaki M., Honkura N., Ellis-Davies G. C., Kasai H. (2004). Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 429, 761–766 10.1038/nature02617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Maxfield F. R., Mcgraw T. E. (2004). Endocytic recycling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 121–132 10.1038/nrm1315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Meda S. A., Narayanan B., Liu J., Perrone-Bizzozero N. I., Stevens M. C., Calhoun V. D., et al. (2012). A large scale multivariate parallel ICA method reveals novel imaging-genetic relationships for Alzheimer's disease in the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage 60, 1608–1621 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mick E., Todorov A., Smalley S., Hu X., Loo S., Todd R. D., et al. (2010). Family-based genome-wide association scan of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 49, 898–905e3. 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.02.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mignot C., Heron D., Bursztyn J., Momtchilova M., Mayer M., Whalen S., et al. (2013). Novel mutation in SLC9A6 gene in a patient with Christianson syndrome and retinitis pigmentosum. Brain Dev. 35, 172–176 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Morrow E. M., Yoo S. Y., Flavell S. W., Kim T. K., Lin Y., Hill R. S., et al. (2008). Identifying autism loci and genes by tracing recent shared ancestry. Science 321, 218–223 10.1126/science.1157657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mott D. D., Washburn M. S., Zhang S., Dingledine R. J. (2003). Subunit-dependent modulation of kainate receptors by extracellular protons and polyamines. J. Neurosci. 23, 1179–1188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Murphy J. E., Padilla B. E., Hasdemir B., Cottrell G. S., Bunnett N. W. (2009). Endosomes: a legitimate platform for the signaling train. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17615–17622 10.1073/pnas.0906541106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nachshen D. A., Drapeau P. (1988). The regulation of cytosolic pH in isolated presynaptic nerve terminals from rat brain. J. Gen. Physiol. 91, 289–303 10.1085/jgp.91.2.289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nakamura N., Tanaka S., Teko Y., Mitsui K., Kanazawa H. (2005). Four Na+/H+ exchanger isoforms are distributed to golgi and post-golgi compartments and are involved in organelle pH regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1561–1572 10.1074/jbc.M410041200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nazarewicz R. R., Salazar G., Patrushev N., San Martin A., Hilenski L., Xiong S., et al. (2011). Early endosomal antigen 1 (EEA1) is an obligate scaffold for angiotensin II-induced, PKC-alpha-dependent Akt activation in endosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2886–2895 10.1074/jbc.M110.141499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nowak L., Bregestovski P., Ascher P., Herbet A., Prochiantz A. (1984). Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature 307, 462–465 10.1038/307462a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Numata M., Orlowski J. (2001). Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel (Na+, K+)/H+ exchanger localized to the trans-Golgi network. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17387–17394 10.1074/jbc.M101319200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ohgaki R., Fukura N., Matsushita M., Mitsui K., Kanazawa H. (2008). Cell surface levels of organellar Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 6 are regulated by interaction with the receptor for activated C-kinase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4417–4429 10.1074/jbc.M705146200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ohgaki R., Matsushita M., Kanazawa H., Ogihara S., Hoekstra D., van Ijzendoorn S. C. (2010). The Na+/H+ exchanger NHE6 in the endosomal recycling system is involved in the development of apical bile canalicular surface domains in HepG2 cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 1293–1304 10.1091/mbc.E09-09-0767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ohgaki R., Van I. S. C., Matsushita M., Hoekstra D., Kanazawa H. (2011). Organellar Na+/H+ exchangers: novel players in organelle pH regulation and their emerging functions. Biochemistry 50, 443–450 10.1021/bi101082e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Onishi I., Lin P. J., Numata Y., Austin P., Cipollone J., Roberge M., et al. (2012). Organellar (Na+, K+)/H+ exchanger NHE7 regulates cell adhesion, invasion and anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Oncol. Rep. 27, 311–317 10.3892/or.2011.1542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Orlowski J., Grinstein S. (2004). Diversity of the mammalian sodium/proton exchanger SLC9 gene family. Pflugers Arch. 447, 549–565 10.1007/s00424-003-1110-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Orlowski J., Grinstein S. (2007). Emerging roles of alkali cation/proton exchangers in organellar homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 483–492 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ouyang Q., Lizarraga S. B., Schmidt M., Yang U., Gong J., Ellisor D., et al. (2013). Christianson syndrome protein nhe6 modulates trkb endosomal signaling required for neuronal circuit development. Neuron. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Park M., Salgado J. M., Ostroff L., Helton T. D., Robinson C. G., Harris K. M., et al. (2006). Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes. Neuron 52, 817–830 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Platta H. W., Stenmark H. (2011). Endocytosis and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 393–403 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Raley-Susman K. M., Cragoe E. J., Jr., Sapolsky R. M., Kopito R. R. (1991). Regulation of intracellular pH in cultured hippocampal neurons by an amiloride-insensitive Na+/H+ exchanger. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2739–2745 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rocha M. A., Crockett D. P., Wong L. Y., Richardson J. R., Sonsalla P. K. (2008). Na+/H+ exchanger inhibition modifies dopamine neurotransmission during normal and metabolic stress conditions. J. Neurochem. 106, 231–243 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05355.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ronicke R., Schroder U. H., Bohm K., Reymann K. G. (2009). The Na+/H+ exchanger modulates long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 379, 233–239 10.1007/s00210-008-0364-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sauvaigo S., Vigne P., Frelin C., Lazdunski M. (1984). Identification of an amiloride sensitive Na+/H+ exchange system in brain synaptosomes. Brain Res. 301, 371–374 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91106-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schenck A., Goto-Silva L., Collinet C., Rhinn M., Giner A., Habermann B., et al. (2008). The endosomal protein Appl1 mediates Akt substrate specificity and cell survival in vertebrate development. Cell 133, 486–497 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schroer R. J., Holden K. R., Tarpey P. S., Matheus M. G., Griesemer D. A., Friez M. J., et al. (2010). Natural history of Christianson syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152A, 2775–2783 10.1002/ajmg.a.33093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schuchmann S., Schmitz D., Rivera C., Vanhatalo S., Salmen B., Mackie K., et al. (2006). Experimental febrile seizures are precipitated by a hyperthermia-induced respiratory alkalosis. Nat. Med. 12, 817–823 10.1038/nm1422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schwiening C. J., Boron W. F. (1994). Regulation of intracellular pH in pyramidal neurones from the rat hippocampus by Na+-dependent Cl−-HCO3− exchange. J. Physiol. 475, 59–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Scita G., Di Fiore P. P. (2010). The endocytic matrix. Nature 463, 464–473 10.1038/nature08910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Scott C. C., Gruenberg J. (2011). Ion flux and the function of endosomes and lysosomes: pH is just the start: the flux of ions across endosomal membranes influences endosome function not only through regulation of the luminal pH. Bioessays 33, 103–110 10.1002/bies.201000108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Shepherd J. D., Huganir R. L. (2007). The cell biology of synaptic plasticity: AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 613–643 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Slepkov E. R., Rainey J. K., Sykes B. D., Fliegel L. (2007). Structural and functional analysis of the Na+/H+ exchanger. Biochem. J. 401, 623–633 10.1042/BJ20061062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Somjen G. G. (1984). Acidification of interstitial fluid in hippocampal formation caused by seizures and by spreading depression. Brain Res. 311, 186–188 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91416-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Sorkin A., von Zastrow M. (2009). Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 609–622 10.1038/nrm2748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Stauber T., Jentsch T. J. (2013). Chloride in vesicular trafficking and function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 453–477 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Szabo E. Z., Numata M., Shull G. E., Orlowski J. (2000). Kinetic and pharmacological properties of human brain Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 5 stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6302–6307 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Takahashi Y., Hosoki K., Matsushita M., Funatsuka M., Saito K., Kanazawa H., et al. (2011). A loss-of-function mutation in the SLC9A6 gene causes X-linked mental retardation resembling Angelman syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 156B, 799–807 10.1002/ajmg.b.31221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Tang C. M., Dichter M., Morad M. (1990). Modulation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate channel by extracellular H+. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 6445–6449 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Traynelis S. F., Cull-Candy S. G. (1990). Proton inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in cerebellar neurons. Nature 345, 347–350 10.1038/345347a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Trudeau L. E., Parpura V., Haydon P. G. (1999). Activation of neurotransmitter release in hippocampal nerve terminals during recovery from intracellular acidification. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 2627–2635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Vaegter C. B., Jansen P., Fjorback A. W., Glerup S., Skeldal S., Kjolby M., et al. (2011). Sortilin associates with Trk receptors to enhance anterograde transport and neurotrophin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 54–61 10.1038/nn.2689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Varsano T., Dong M. Q., Niesman I., Gacula H., Lou X., Ma T., et al. (2006). GIPC is recruited by APPL to peripheral TrkA endosomes and regulates TrkA trafficking and signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 8942–8952 10.1128/MCB.00305-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Velisek L. (1998). Extracellular acidosis and high levels of carbon dioxide suppress synaptic transmission and prevent the induction of long-term potentiation in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices. Hippocampus 8, 24–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Velisek L., Dreier J. P., Stanton P. K., Heinemann U., Moshe S. L. (1994). Lowering of extracellular pH suppresses low-Mg2+-induces seizures in combined entorhinal cortex-hippocampal slices. Exp. Brain Res. 101, 44–52 10.1007/BF00243215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wakabayashi S., Shigekawa M., Pouyssegur J. (1997). Molecular physiology of vertebrate Na+/H+ exchangers. Physiol. Rev. 77, 51–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Walz H. A., Shi X., Chouinard M., Bue C. A., Navaroli D. M., Hayakawa A., et al. (2010). Isoform-specific regulation of Akt signaling by the endosomal protein WDFY2. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14101–14108 10.1074/jbc.M110.110536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang Z., Edwards J. G., Riley N., Provance D. W., Jr., Karcher R., Li X. D., et al. (2008). Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell 135, 535–548 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wemmie J. A., Zha X.-M., Welsh M. J. (2008). Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) and pH in synapse physiology, in Structural and Functional Organization of the Synapse, eds Hell J. W., Ehlers M. D. (Philadelphia, PA: Springer; ), 661–681 [Google Scholar]
  102. Xinhan L., Matsushita M., Numaza M., Taguchi A., Mitsui K., Kanazawa H. (2011). Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 6 (NHE6/SLC9A6) is involved in clathrin-dependent endocytosis of transferrin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 301, C1431–C1444 10.1152/ajpcell.00154.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zha X. M. (2013). Acid-sensing ion channels: trafficking and synaptic function. Mol. Brain 6, 1 10.1186/1756-6606-6-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Zha X. M., Wemmie J. A., Green S. H., Welsh M. J. (2006). Acid-sensing ion channel 1a is a postsynaptic proton receptor that affects the density of dendritic spines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 16556–16561 10.1073/pnas.0608018103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhou Q., Sheng M. (2013). NMDA receptors in nervous system diseases. Neuropharmacology 74, 69–75 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES