Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Nov 7;129(47):14788–14792. doi: 10.1021/ja0772039

Highly Stereo- and Regioselective Synthesis of (Z)-Trisubstituted Alkenes via 1-Bromo-1-alkyne Hydroboration–Migratory Insertion–Zn-Promoted Iodinolysis and Pd-Catalyzed Organozinc Cross-Coupling

Zhihong Huang 1, Ei-ichi Negishi 1,
PMCID: PMC3891656  NIHMSID: NIHMS62799  PMID: 17985915

Abstract

Hydroboration of 1-bromo-1-alkynes with dibromoborane followed by addition of 3 or 4 equiv of Me2Zn provides an efficient and selective route to (Z)-2-alkenyldimethylboranes (3) or (Z)-2-alkenylmethylzincs (4), respectively, which have been successfully applied to one-pot Suzuki (B-I) or Negishi (Zn-I) coupling in some less demanding cases. However, in more demanding cross-coupling reactions, only the use of either (Z)-2-alkenyliodides (5) or the alkenylzincs prepared from lithiation and then zincation of 5 proves to be highly satisfactory (Zn-II or Zn-III protocol). On the contrary, the corresponding organoboron coupling under B-II or B-III protocol appears to be less satisfactory. Preliminary studies indicate that certain substituents proximal to trisubstituted alkenes seriously affect the course of the desired alkenylboron cross-coupling.

Introduction

Highly substituted conjugated dienes and oligoenes, especially those that contain tri- and tetrasubstituted Z alkenes, continue providing major synthetic challenges. Archazolid A (1a) and B (1b) (Scheme 1), highly potent vacuolar-type ATPase inhibitors,1a for example, possess a conjugated triene fragment, in which the C9–C12 conjugated diene component is a very rare example of (Z,Z)-1,1,3,4-tetrasubstituted 1,3-dienes with a proximal methyl-branching asymmetric carbon center in the C8 position. Even though an attractive and selective route to this class of conjugated dienes has just been devised1b through the use of the Still-Gennari modification2 of the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons olefination,3 no widely applicable satisfactory alkenyl-alkenyl cross-coupling route has been available. We report herein an efficient and strictly stereoselective method for this and related classes of compounds requiring Pd-catalyzed alkenylation that is complementary with C=C bond-generating carbonyl olefination routes. It should be applicable to the synthesis of not only 1 but also other related synthetically demanding (Z)-trisubstituted alkenes and their derivatives. It consists of (i) 1-halo-1-alkyne hydroboration, (ii) migratory insertion of 1-halo-1-alkenylboron derivatives, (iii) Zn-promoted transmetalative iodinolysis, and (iv) Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling with alkenylzincs, requiring isolation of only 5 and the product (6) (Scheme 2).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Results and Discussion

Highly regio- and stereoselective hydroboration of 1-halo-1-alkynes to give 2 in excellent yields and their subsequent migratory insertion to produce 3 with strict inversion of configuration, explored by Zweifel4 and exploited by us to devise the first highly selective and potentially general method for the synthesis of (E,E)-conjugated dienes in 1973,5 was one of the key developments of an alkenylboron-based general and stereoselective methodology for the synthesis of conjugated dienes and related compounds.6 Although trisubstituted alkene intermediates, such as 2 and 3, were generated, protonolysis of the C–B bonds led only to the formation of disubstituted alkenes and their derivatives. This method was soon supplanted by the Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling with Al,7,8 Zn,8,9 and Zr,8,10 discovered and developed by us during the 1976–1978 period and by subsequent developments involving organometals containing B,11 Cu,12 Sn,13 and others.14 Particularly noteworthy is the direct Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of 3 to give 6 developed by Suzuki in 1986.15 Despite the efficiency and high stereoselectivity observed in some conjugated diene syntheses by this reaction, which have been experimentally reproduced (vide infra), our many attempts have failed to produce a model diene (7) via Pd-catalyzed Suzuki cross-coupling of 3a and the corresponding iodide (B-I protocol) for the synthesis of 1. Direct use of in situ generated alkenylzinc derivatives (4) (Zn-I protocol) has thus far been of limited success towards synthesis of 7 or 8 as well. In marked contrast, conversion and isolation of 3 into alkenyl iodide (5) via transmetalative iodinolysis developed by Knochel16 permit clean and high-yielding Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling with organozincs to produce 6 including 7 and a more advanced intermediate 8 (Zn-II protocol) well-suited for the synthesis of 1. To the best of our knowledge, the method shown in Scheme 2 appears to be the only currently known convenient and highly (≥98%) selective synthesis of (Z,Z)-dienes of the type represented by 7 and 8 via alkenyl-alkenyl coupling. Some comparative experimental results via different protocols (Zn-I, Zn-II, Zn-III and B-I, B-II, B-III) are summarized in Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

In view of an earlier claim of the synthesis of 11 in 70% yield by the use of (E)-3-bromo-2-methyl-2-propen-1-ol and 3 mol% of Pd(PPh3)4 as a catalyst,15 its synthesis was carried out by the use of (E)-3-iodo-2-methyl-2-propen-1-ol, which led to a clean formation of 11 in 72% yield (Scheme 4). The striking difference between the results observed in the syntheses of 10 (Scheme 3) and 11 must be attributable to the presence of Me and TBDPSO groups in 10 and their absence in 11. Indeed, the results shown in Scheme 4 indicate that the presence of either group in the indicated positions is detrimental to the organoborane protocol15 but that the Zn-II protocol is not noticeably affected by their presence.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Although the major attention of this work has been focused on the development of efficient and selective procedures applicable to the synthesis of archazolid A and B, the protocol represented by Scheme 2 is widely applicable to the synthesis of a variety of (Z)-trisubstituted alkenes. In view of the wide occurrence of natural products derivable via 5a containing either an alkene-bound Me or Et group, 15–22 have been prepared in uniformly high yields (70–95%) and selectivity (≥97–98%) as summarized in Scheme 5. In some cases, e.g., synthesis of 15–18, the Zn-I protocol is very satisfactory, but the Zn-II protocol using isolated alkenyl iodides is more widely applicable and dependable, as demonstrated by the synthesis of 15, 16, and 19–21. It should be noted that 19 would serve as a potentially attractive intermediate for the synthesis of discodermolide (23).17 On the other hand, carbonyl-containing reagents may preferably be introduced as the electrophilic cross-coupling partner. In such cases, the Zn-III protocol, which has been shown to be far superior to the Zn-I protocol, should provide the best option, as exemplified by the synthesis of 22. Application of 22 to the synthesis of callystatin A (24)18 appears eminently feasible, and such efforts are in progress.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Any other convenient and selective routes to 5 would provide synthetic equivalents to that shown in Scheme 2, although none of the previously developed protocols appear to have been applied to the synthesis of (Z,Z)-1,1,3,4-tetrasubstituted 1,3-dienes. One notable example is the four-step conversion of 1-alkynes into 5 via silylation–hydrozirconation followed by iodinolysis–cross-coupling–desilylative iodinolysis,19 which suffers from the need for isolation of three intermediates. Conversion of aldehydes to 1,1-dibromo-1-alkenes followed by stepwise cross-coupling with inversion in the second step developed recently by us,20 in principle, is a more efficient route to 6. However, both the Pd-catalyzed trans-selective monosubstitution and the Pd-catalyzed second substitution with inversion in more demanding cases appear to require further development.

Conclusion

  1. Hydroboration of 1-bromo-1-alkynes with dibromoborane4 followed by addition of 3 equiv of Me2Zn provides (Z)-2-alkenyldimethylboranes (3), while the use of 4 equiv of Me2Zn leads to the formation of the corresponding (Z)-2-alkenylmethylzincs (4).4 The use of Et2Zn in place of Me2Zn provides the corresponding Et-substituted compounds.

  2. Whereas iodinolysis of 3 with I2 has not been satisfactory in our hands, that of 4 with I2 readily affords the corresponding iodides 5 in high yields. The (Z)-2-alkenyl iodides thus obtained can be converted to the bromozinc derivatives or the borane derivatives via lithiation with 2 equiv of tBuLi followed by treatment with dry ZnBr2 or appropriate boranes, respectively.

  3. In less demanding cases, the cross-coupling of either alkenylboranes (3) or alkenylzincs (4) catalyzed by Pd(PPh3)4 or Pd(DPEphos)Cl2 can proceed satisfactorily (See the results obtained by the use of B-I protocol and Zn-I protocol in Schemes 4 and 5).

  4. In more demanding cases, such as those shown in Schemes 3 and 4, however, neither B-I nor Zn-I protocol proved satisfactory, the yields of the desired products being ≤40%. In such cases, the use of either isolated alkenyl iodides (Zn-II protocol) or the alkenylzincs derived from the isolated iodides (Zn-III protocol) in the Negishi coupling proved to be highly satisfactory (Schemes 24). On the contrary, the corresponding organoboron cross-coupling under the B-II or B-III protocol has thus far been disappointing (Scheme 3).

  5. There are clear indications that certain substituents proximal to the crucial trisubstituted alkenes, such as branching Me and alkyl groups in the allylic position and β-silyloxy groups seriously affect the course of the desired Pd-catalyzed alkenylation (Scheme 4). Fortunately, the Zn-II and/or Zn-III protocols have provided satisfactory procedures for all of the demanding cases that have thus far been tested. Both Zn-II and Zn-III protocols have provided potential intermediates 8a and 8b, respectively, for the synthesis of archazolides A and B (1a and 1b) in 83 and 81% yields, respectively, as isomerically ≥98% pure compounds.

Experimental Section

Several representative procedures are listed below. The experimental procedures and spectroscopic data for all compounds can be found in the Supporting Information.

(4Z,6S)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-4,6-dimeth-yl-1,4-heptadiene (16). Representative Procedure for the Use of in Situ Generated (Z)-4-Methyl-2-alkenylzincs (Zn-I Protocol)

To a solution of (3S)-4-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-3-methyl-1-bromo-1-butyne (0.21 g, 0.50 mmol) in toluene (0.50 mL) in a Schlenk flask capped with a rubber septum, was added Br2BH (0.50 mL, 1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.50 mmol) at 23 °C, and then the reaction mixture was warmed to 70 °C and kept at this temperature for 1 h. The resultant mixture was cooled to −78 °C, and Me2Zn (1.0 mL, 2.0 M in toluene, 2.0 mmol) was added dropwise. After 10 min at −78 °C, the reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C. After 20 min, the rubber septum was replaced with a glass stopper under a steady flow of Argon, and most of the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The resulting organozinc reagent was redissolved in THF (2.0 mL) at 0 °C, treated with allyl bromide (0.12g, 1.0 mmol) and Pd(DPEphos)Cl2 (7.2 mg, 10 µmol) in DMF (3.0 mL), warmed to 23 °C, and monitored by GLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 6 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with 1 NHCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 95/5 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 0.13 g (71%) of the desired product 16: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.01 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.13 (s, 9 H), 1.78 (s, 3 H), 2.45–2.85 (m, 3 H), 3.45–3.7 (m, 2 H), 4.95–5.2 (m, 3 H), 5.7–5.85 (m, 1 H), 7.4–7.55 (m, 6 H), 7.7–7.85 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.59, 18.77, 20.28, 27.86 (3C), 36.11, 36.26, 69.83, 115.87, 128.42, 128.56 (4C), 130.47 (2C), 135.05 (2C), 136.65 (4C), 137.83, 139.76. HRMS calcd. for C25H34OSi 378.2379, found 378.2377.

(2Z,4Z,6S)-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2,4,6-tri-methyl-2,4-heptadien-1-ol (7a). Representative Procedure for the Use of Isolated (Z)-4-Methyl-2-alkenyl Iodides for the Negishi Coupling (Zn-II Protocol)

A solution of (1Z)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-iodo-2-methyl-1-propene (0.32 g, 1.0 mmol) in ether (2.0 mL) was treated with tBuLi (1.2 mL, 1.7 M in pentane, 2.0 mmol) at −78 °C for 30 min and then with a solution of dry ZnBr2 (0.23 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL) at −78 °C for 10 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 30 min, treated with a solution of 5a (0.37 g, 0.80 mmol) and Pd(PPh3)4 (23 mg, 0.020 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL), warmed to 23 °C, and monitored by GLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 5 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with aqueous NH4Cl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated to give a viscous oil. To this crude product in THF (3.5 mL) were added 6 drops of 1 N HCl at 23 °C, and the resultant mixture was monitored by TLC analysis. After the complete removal of the TBS group (ca. 30 min), the mixture was quenched with 1 N HCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 95/5 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 0.27 g (84% over 2 steps) of the desired product 7a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.99 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 1.13 (s, 9 H), 1.35 (br, 1 H), 1.82 (s, 3 H), 1.92 (d, J =1.8 Hz, 3 H), 2.55–2.65 (m, 1 H), 3.52 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2 H), 4.05–4.25 (m, 2 H), 5.12 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.79 (s, 1 H), 7.4–7.55 (m, 6 H), 7.7–7.8 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 17.13, 19.35, 20.84, 24.65, 26.93 (3C), 36.22, 62.95, 68.79, 127.07, 127.66 (4C), 129.62 (2C), 131.45, 132.88 (2C), 133.94 (2C), 135.74 (4C). HRMS calcd. for C26H36O2Si 408.2485, found 408.2483.

(2Z,4Z,6S)-1-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)-7-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyloxy)-2,4,6-trimethyl-2,4-heptadiene (7b). Representative Procedure for the Use of (Z)-4-Methyl-2-alkenylzincs Generated from the Corresponding Alkenyl Iodides (Zn-III Protocol)

A solution of 5a (0.46 g, 1.0 mmol) in ether (2.0 mL) was treated with tBuLi (1.2 mL, 1.7 M in pentane, 2.0 mmol) at −78 °C over 30 min and then with a solution of dry ZnBr2 (0.23 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL) at −78 °C for 10 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 30 min, treated with Pd(PPh3)4 (23 mg, 0.020 mmol) and (1Z)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-iodo-2-methyl-1-propene (0.25 g, 0.80 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL), warmed to 23 °C, and monitored by GLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 4 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with 1 N HCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 98/2 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 0.33 g (78%) of the desired product 7b: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.11 (s, 6 H), 0.97 (s, 9 H), 1.04 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3 H), 1.13 (s, 9 H), 1.81 (s, 3 H), 1.88 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H), 2.4–2.6 (m, 1 H), 3.4–3.6 (m, 2 H), 4.12 (s, 2 H), 5.11 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.72 (s, 1 H), 7.4–7.55 (m, 6 H), 7.7–7.8 (m, 4 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ −5.24 (2C), 17.08, 18.42, 19.38, 20.67, 24.49, 26.0 (3C), 26.93 (3C), 36.14, 62.89, 68.53, 125.72, 127.6 (4C), 129.54 (2C), 131.11, 132.68, 134.14 (2C), 135.71 (4C), 136.19.

(2E,4Z)-2,4-Dimethyl-2,4-nonadien-1-ol (11). Representative Procedure for the Use of in Situ Generated (Z)-2-Alkenylborons (B-I Protocol)

To a solution of 1-bromo-1-hexyne (80 mg, 0.50 mmol) in toluene (0.50 mL) was added Br2BH (0.50 mL, 1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 0.50 mmol) at 23 °C, and then the reaction mixture was warmed to 70 °C and kept at this temperature for 1 h. The resultant mixture was cooled to −78 °C, and Me2Zn (0.75 mL, 2.0 M in toluene, 1.5 mmol) was added dropwise. After 10 min at −78 °C, the reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 30 min, treated with a solution of (1E)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-iodo-2-methyl-1-propene (0.13g, 0.42 mmol), Pd(DPEphos)Cl2 (7.2 mg, 10 µmol), and NaOMe (1.0 mL, 1.0 M in MeOH, 1.0 mmol) in DMF (3.0 mL), warmed to 60 °C, and monitored by GLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 10 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with 1 N HCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 95/5 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 51 mg (72%) of the desired product 11: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.75–0.95 (m, 3 H), 1.2–1.35 (m, 4 H), 1.5 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.65 (d, J = 0.9 Hz, 3 H), 1.76 (s, 3 H), 1.85–1.95 (m, 2 H), 4.07 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.25 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 5.89 (s, 1 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 15.28, 22.49, 23.9, 28.87, 31.84, 68.79, 124.93, 128.72, 131.84, 136.16. HRMS calcd. for C11H20O 168.1514, found 168.1512.

7a. Representative Procedure for the use of Isolated (Z)-4-Methyl-2-alkenyl Iodides (B-II Protocol)

A solution of (1Z)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-iodo-2-methyl-1-propene (0.32 g, 1.0 mmol) in ether (2.0 mL) was treated with tBuLi (1.2 mL, 1.7 M in pentane, 2.0 mmol) at −78 °C over 30 min, and B-methoxy-9-BBN (1.0 mL, 1.0 M in hexanes, 1.0 mmol) at −78 °C for 10 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 30 min, treated with a solution of 5a (0.37 g, 0.80 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.65 g, 2.0 mmol), and Pd(DPEphos)Cl2 (14 mg, 0.020 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL), warmed to 60 °C, and monitored by TLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 14 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with 1 N HCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated to give a viscous oil. To this crude product in THF (3.5 mL) was added 3 drops of 1 N HCl at 23 °C, and the resultant mixture was monitored by TLC analysis. After the complete removal of the TBS group (ca. 30 min), the mixture was quenched with aqueous NH4Cl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 95/5 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 0.14 g (42% over 2 steps) of the desired product 7a.

7b. Representative Procedure for the Use of (Z)-4-Methyl-2-alkenylborons Generated from the Corresponding Alkenyl Iodides (B-III Protocol)

A solution of 5a (0.46 g, 1.0 mmol) in ether (2.0 mL) was treated with tBuLi (1.2 mL, 1.7 M in pentane, 2.0 mmol) at −78 °C over 30 min, and then with B-methoxy-9-BBN (1.0 mL, 1.0 M in hexanes, 1.0 mmol) at −78 °C for 10 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to 0 °C over 30 min, treated with a solution of (1Z)-3-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-iodo-2-methyl-1-propene (0.25 g, 0.80 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.65 g, 2.0 mmol) and Pd(DPEphos)Cl2 (14 mg, 0.020 mmol) in DMF (1.5 mL), warmed to 60 °C, and monitored by TLC analysis. The reaction was complete in 16 h, and the reaction mixture was quenched with 1 N HCl, extracted with ether, washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated. Flash chromatography (silica gel, 98/2 hexanes-EtOAc) afforded 0.17 g (40%) of the desired product 7b.

Supplementary Material

1si20070917_03
2si20070917_03
3si20070917_03

Acknowledgment

We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-0309613), the National Institutes of Health (GM 36792), and Purdue University for support of this work.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental procedures and compound characterization data. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Hassfeld J, Farès C, Steinmetz H, Carlomagno T, Menche D. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4751. doi: 10.1021/ol061831y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Menche D, Hassfeld J, Li J, Rudolph S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:6100. doi: 10.1021/ja071461o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Still WC, Gennari C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:4405. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Horner L, Hoffmann H, Wippel HG, Klahre G. Chem. Ber. 1959;92:2499. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wadsworth WS, Jr, Emmons WD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961;83:1733. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Zweifel G, Arzoumanian H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967;89:5086. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chen YK, Walsh PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:3702. doi: 10.1021/ja0396145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Negishi E, Yoshida T. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1973:606. doi: 10.1021/ja00801a056. (b) For its application to the synthesis of (E)-1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-butatrienes, see: Yoshida T, Williams RM, Negishi E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974;96:3688.
  • 6.For the synthesis of (E,Z)-1,4-disubstituted conjugated dienes, see: Negishi E, Lew G, Yoshida T. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1973:874. Negishi E, Abramovitch A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977:411.
  • 7.Baba S, Negishi E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976;98:6729. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Negishi E, Okukado N, King AO, Van Horn DE, Spiegel BI. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978;100:2254. [Google Scholar]; (b) Negishi E, Takahashi T, Baba S, Van Horn DE, Okukado N, Luo FT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:2393. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.King AO, Okukado N, Negishi E. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1977:683. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Okukado N, Van Horn DE, Klima WL, Negishi E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978:1027. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Miyaura N, Yamada K, Suzuki A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979;20:3437. (b) For a review, see: Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995;95:2457.
  • 12.(a) Jabri N, Alexakis A, Normant JF. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22:959. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jabri N, Alexakis A, Normant JF. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982;23:1589. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stille JK, Groh BL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:813. (b) For a review, see: Farina V, Krishnamurthy V, Scott WJ. Org. React. 1997;50:1.
  • 14.For reviews containing discussions of Pd-, Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling with other metals, see: Negishi E. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. 2 Vols. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 2002. pp. p215–1119. Part III. de Meijere A, Diedcrich F, editors. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. 2 Vols. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2004. p. 916pp.
  • 15.Satoh M, Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Lett. 1986:1329. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Langer F, Schwink L, Devasagayaraj A, Chavant PY, Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:8229. doi: 10.1021/jo961129n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Oppolzer W, Radinov R, Brabander JD. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:2607. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.(a) Smith AB, III, Qiu Y, Jones DR, Kobayashi K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;11:12011. 7. [Google Scholar]; (b) Harried SS, Yang G, Strawn MA, Myles DC. J. Org. Chem. 1997;62:6098. [Google Scholar]; (c) Marshall JA, Johns BA. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:7885. doi: 10.1021/jo971900+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Paterson I, Florence GJ, Gerlach K, Scott J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:377. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(20000117)39:2<377::aid-anie377>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.(a) Murakami N, Wang W, Aoki M, Tsutsui Y, Sugimoto M, Kobayashi M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2349. [Google Scholar]; (b) Smith AB, III, Brandt BM. Org. Lett. 2001;3:1685. doi: 10.1021/ol0158922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kalesse M, Quitschalle M, Khandavalli CP, Saeed A. Org. Lett. 2001;3:3107. doi: 10.1021/ol016365l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Marshall JA, Bourbeau MP. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:2751. doi: 10.1021/jo016025d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Lautens M, Stammers TA. Synthesis. 2002:1993. [Google Scholar]; (f) Langille NF, Panek JS. Org. Lett. 2004;6:3203. doi: 10.1021/ol048664r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arefolov A, Langille NF, Panek JS. Org. Lett. 2001;3:3281. doi: 10.1021/ol016486l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.(a) Zeng X, Hu Q, Qian M, Negishi E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:13636. doi: 10.1021/ja0304392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zeng X, Qian M, Hu Q, Negishi E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:2259. doi: 10.1002/anie.200353022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1si20070917_03
2si20070917_03
3si20070917_03

RESOURCES