Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for the most common serotypes of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). A total of 293 IPD cases were analyzed in children aged 3–59 mo in a community with intermediate vaccination coverage with the 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7). IPD cases were reviewed during 2007–2009 in two pediatric hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). A multivariate analysis using unconditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio. PCV7 coverage was 45.4%. Pneumonia with empyema (64.5%) was the most frequent clinical manifestation. The most common serotypes were: serotype 1 (21.2%), 19A (16.0%), 3 (12.6%) and 7F/A (6.8%). 70.0% of serotypes found were included in the 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13), 39.2% in the 10-valent conjugate vaccine and 8.1% in the PCV7. PCV7 was protective in IPD cases due to PCV7-serotypes (aOR: 0.15, 95% CI:0.04–0.55). Serotype 1 was positively associated with attending day care or school (aOR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.21–10.38) and age 24–59 mo (aOR: 7.70, 95% CI:2.70–21.98). Serotype 19A was positively associated with respiratory infection in the previous month (aOR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.03–4.94), non-penicillin susceptible IPD (aOR: 1.89, 95% CI:1.13–3.16) and negatively associated with age 24–59 mo (aOR: 0.19, 95% CI:0.09–0.41). Serotype 3 was positively associated with vaccination (aOR: 4.87, 95% CI:2.05–11.59). No factors were associated with serotype 7F/A. Vaccination with pneumococcal vaccines including more serotypes may reduce the risk of disease in our setting.
Keywords: invasive pneumococcal disease, risk factors, serotypes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Introduction
Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is a serious public health problem caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. The main component of virulence of the bacterium is the polysaccharide capsule, which facilitates cell invasion and development of the disease. Ninety-three serotypes have been described according to the polysaccharide proteins that constitute the capsule. Various host-related factors (age, genetic factors,1 risk medical conditions2), environmental factors (day care attendance,2,3 difficulty in accessing health services2) and geographical factors4 may be associated with IPD.
The polysaccharide capsule is involved in many aspects of the epidemiology of IPD. An inverse relationship between carrying a given serotype and its invasiveness5 and between the invasiveness and severity of the disease6 has been postulated. Relationships between the serotype and age, clinical presentation,7 disease evolution8,9 and antibiotic resistance10,11 have been reported.
After the introduction of the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7), associations have been maintained between IPD and some risk factors such as day care attendance but the association with other factors, such as breastfeeding, has disappeared.2
Although the PCV7 is not included in the official vaccination schedule in Catalonia, many pediatricians recommend it in clinical practice and parents pay for the vaccine. However, children aged < 5 y with risk factors receive the vaccine free of charge at 2, 4 and 6 mo, with a booster dose during the second year of life, according to the vaccination schedule contained in the summary of product characteristics.12 Current estimated vaccination coverage is around 50%.13
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the serotypes of S. pneumoniae most commonly found in our setting and risk factors for IPD after PCV7 licensing.
Results
Clinical characteristics
A total of 315 cases of IPD were diagnosed in children aged 3–59 mo. Twenty cases were excluded because the serotype could not be determined and two cases because the vaccination status could not be established. Of the 293 cases finally analyzed, 115 (39.2%) were diagnosed by culture and 178 (60.8%) by real-time PCR. The mean age was 30.2 mo (SD: 15.5). The clinical manifestations included pneumonia with empyema (64.5%), pneumonia without empyema (15.7%), meningitis (9.6%), non-focal bacteremia (7.5%), osteoarticular infection (1.7%), cellulitis (0.7%) and sepsis (0.3%).
The most frequent serotypes were: serotype 1 (62 cases, 21.2%), 19A (47 cases, 16.0%), 3 (37 cases, 12.6%) and 7F/A (20 cases, 6.8%). PCV7 serotypes represented only 8.9% (26 cases) of isolates. Serotypes included in the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) represented 39.2% (115 cases) and serotypes included in the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) represented 70% (205 cases).
Table 1 shows the risk factors analyzed in all study children: 45.4% (133/293) were fully vaccinated for their age, 14% (41/293) required ICU admission and 1% (3/293) died. Of the 115 cases diagnosed by culture, 34.8% (40 cases) were non-penicillin susceptible.
Table 1. General characteristics of cases included in the study and risk factors for IPD associated with PCV7 serotypes.
| All cases (n = 293), % |
PCV7 serotypes (n = 26), % | Non-PCV7 serotypes (n = 267), % |
OR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex-male | 53.9 | 61.5 | 53.2 | 1.41 (0.62 – 3.22) | 1.51 (0.59 – 3.84) | ||
| Age | |||||||
| 3–23 mo | 39.2 | 61.5 | 37.1 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 24–59 mo | 60.8 | 38.5 | 62.9 | 0.37 (0.16 – 0.84) | 0.50 (0.18 – 1.38) | ||
| Vaccination status | |||||||
| Non vaccinated | 46.8 | 76.9 | 43.8 | Reference | Reference | ||
| Vaccinated | 45.4 | 19.2 | 47.9 | 0.23 (0.08 – 0.63) | 0.15 (0.04 – 0.55) | ||
| Day care or school attendance | 81.3 | 64.0 | 83.0 | 0.36 (0.15 – 0.88) | 0.34 (0.13 – 0.89) | ||
| Antibiotic treatment | 14.3 | 20.0 | 13.8 | 1.56 (0.55 – 4.43) | 2.13 (0.66 – 6.82) | ||
| Respiratory infection | 47.7 | 48.0 | 47.7 | 1.01 (0.44 – 2.30) | 0.81 (0.30 – 2.22) | ||
| Breastfeeding | 9.6 | 11.5 | 9.4 | 1.26 (0.35 – 4.50) | 0.56 (0.13 – 2.40) | ||
| Exposure to tobacco in home | |||||||
| 0 cigarettes/d | 59.6 | 52.2 | 60.3 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 1–19 cigarettes/d | 19.3 | 30.4 | 18.3 | 1.92 (0.72 – 5.16) | 3.16 (0.96 – 10.43) | ||
| ≥ 20 cigarettes/d | 21.1 | 17.4 | 21.4 | 0.94 (0.29 – 3.03) | 1.10 (0.28 – 4.23) | ||
| Cohabitants > 4 persons | 24.5 | 34.8 | 23.6 | 1.73 (0.70 – 4.28) | 1.18 (0.43 – 3.25) | ||
| Siblings < 5 y | 30.5 | 39.1 | 29.7 | 1.52 (0.63 – 3.66) | 1.38 (0.54 – 3.53) | ||
| Social class | |||||||
| I-III | 59.6 | 34.8 | 62.0 | Reference | Reference | ||
| IV-V | 40.4 | 65.2 | 38.0 | 3.06 (1.25 – 7.51) | 2.03 (0.78 – 5.31) | ||
| Risk medical conditions | 1.4 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 3.52 (0.35 – 35.11) | 8.16 (0.65 – 102.43) | ||
| ICU | 14.0 | 23.1 | 13.1 | 1.99 (0.75 – 5.29) | 1.45 (0.46 – 4.58) | ||
| Death | 1.0 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 5.30 (0.46 – 60.52) | 1.67 (0.11 – 25.87) | ||
| Non-penicillin susceptibleb | 34.8 | 70.6 | 28.6 | 2.45 (1.39 – 4.31) | 2.01 (1.04 – 3.90) | ||
Notes: aAdjusted for age, vaccination with ≥ 1 dose of PCV7, attending day care or school, antibiotics prescribed within 30 d before the onset of clinical symptoms and previous respiratory infection. bAntibiogram was performed in cases diagnosed by culture (n = 115). Abbreviations: y, year; m, months; d, days; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; PCV7, 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; ICU, intensive care unit; IPD, invasive pneumococcal disease.
Associated factors according to serotype
Comparison of cases of IPD caused by PCV7 serotypes and non-PCV7 serotypes showed a positive association between IPD and non-penicillin susceptible strains (aOR: 2.01, 95% CI:1.04–3.90) (Table 1) and non-focal bacteremia (aOR: 3.41, 95% CI:1.02–11.35) (Table 3). PCV7 serotypes were negatively associated with PCV7 vaccination (aOR: 0.15, 95% CI:0.04–0.55) and attendance at day care or school (aOR: 0.34, 95% CI:0.13–0.89) (Table 1).
Table 3. Association between clinical presentation and IPD caused by different serotypes.
| Clinical presentation | PCV7 Serotypes (n = 26), % | aOR (95% CI)a |
Serotype 1 (n = 62), %a | aOR (95%CI)a |
Serotype 19A (n = 47),% | aOR (95%CI)a |
Serotype 3 (n = 37),% | aOR (95%CI)a |
Serotype 7F (n = 20),% | aOR (95% CI)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumoniab | 50.0 | 0.25 (0.08–0.79) | 100.0 | — | 68.1 | 0.53 (0.25–1.13) | 97.3 | 14.77 (1.79–121.70) | 60.0 | 0.31 (0.09–1.07) |
| Empyema | 19.2 | 0.28 (0.09–0.87) | 75.8 | 2.57 (1.33–4.96) | 57.4 | 7.80 (2.91–20.86) | 75.7 | 3.01 (1.22–7.43) | 35.0 | 0.45 (0.16–1.25) |
| Without empyema | 30.8 | 1.18 (0.44–3.21)1 | 24.2 | 0.85 (0.41–1.76) | 10.6 | 0.19 (0.05–0.66) | 21.6 | 0.86 (0.36–2.04) | 25.0 | 1.02 (0.35–2.96) |
| Meningitis | 23.1 | 2.40 (0.72–7.94)2 | 0 | — | 12.8 | 0.41 (0.14–1.21) | 2.7 | 0.22 (0.03–1.82) | 20.0 | 2.08 (0.56–7.70) |
| Non-focal bacteremia | 26.9 | 3.41 (1.02–11.35) | 0 | — | 12.8 | 0.75 (0.24–2.37) | 0.0 | — | 15.0 | 2.18 (0.52–9.06) |
| Others | 0.0 | — | 0.0 | — | 6.4 | 1.10 (0.24–5.11) | 0.0 | — | 5.0 | 1.35(0.15–12.43) |
Notes: aAdjusted for age, vaccination with ≥ 1 dose of PCV7, attending day care or school, antibiotics prescribed within 30 d before the onset of clinical symptoms and previous respiratory infection. bWith and without empyema.
Analysis of the serotypes most frequently found in this study (serotype 1, 19A, 3 and 7F/A) showed a positive association between IPD due to serotype 1 and the 24–59 mo age group (aOR: 7.70, 95% CI:2.70–21.98) and attendance at day care or school (aOR: 3.55, 95% CI:1.21–10 0.38) (Table 2). All cases presented pneumonia, of which 75.8% were with empyema (aOR: 2.57, 95% CI:1.33–4.96) (Table 3).
Table 2. Risk factors for IPD according to serotype.
| Serotype 1 (n = 62) % |
Others (n = 231) % | aOR (95% CI)a |
Serotype 19A (n = 47) % |
Others (n = 246) % | aOR (95%CI)a |
Serotype 3 (n = 37) % |
Others (n = 256) % | aOR (95%CI)a |
Serotype 7F (n = 20) % |
Others (n = 273) % | aOR (95% CI)a |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex-male | 54.8 | 53.7 | 1.23 (0.65 – 2.34) |
59.6 | 52.8 | 1.53 (0.73 – 3.22) |
43.2 | 55.5 | 0.58 (0.28 – 1.21) |
75.0 | 52.4 | 2.53 (0.88 – 7.28) |
| Age | ||||||||||||
| 3–23 mo | 8.1 | 47.6 | Reference | 70.2 | 33.3 | Reference | 43.2 | 38.7 | Reference | 50.0 | 38.5 | Reference |
| 24–59 mo | 91.9 | 52.4 | 7.70 (2.70 – 21.98) |
29.8 | 66.7 | 0.19 (0.09 – 0.41) |
56.8 | 61.3 | 1.11 (0.45 – 2.73) |
50.0 | 61.5 | 0.79 (0.27 – 2.34) |
| Vaccination status | ||||||||||||
| Non vaccinated | 37.1 | 49.4 | Reference | 57.4 | 44.7 | Reference | 24.3 | 50.0 | Reference | 40.0 | 47.3 | Reference |
| Vaccinated | 53.2 | 43.3 | 1.14 (0.57 – 2.31) |
40.4 | 46.3 | 0.61 (0.30 – 1.27) |
73.0 | 41.4 | 4.87 (2.05 – 11.59) |
55.0 | 44.7 | 1.69 (0.64 – 4.51) |
| Day care or school attendance | 93.3 | 78.1 | 3.55 (1.21 – 10.38) |
75.0 | 82.5 | 0.86 (0.35 – 2.12) |
74.3 | 82.3 | 0.42 (0.17 – 1.01) |
75.0 | 81.8 | 0.94 (0.26 – 3.27) |
| Antibiotic treatment | 6.6 | 16.4 | 0.37 (0.12 – 1.16) |
22.7 | 12.8 | 1.96 (0.76 – 5.03) |
11.4 | 14.7 | 0.81 (0.24 – 2.75) |
15.0 | 14.3 | 0.79 (0.20 – 3.12) |
| Respiratory infection | 41.0 | 49.6 | 1.09 (0.46 – 2.90) |
65.1 | 44.6 | 2.26 (1.03 – 4.94) |
37.1 | 49.2 | 0.65 (0.29 – 1.48) |
50.0 | 47.5 | 1.04 (0.38 – 2.85) |
| Breastfeeding | 6.5 | 10.4 | 0.95 (0.28 – 3.14) |
14.9 | 8.5 | 1.24 (0.41 – 3.69) |
8.1 | 9.8 | 0.59 (0.14 – 2.43) |
5.0 | 9.9 | 0.29 (0.03 – 2.50) |
| Exposure to tobacco in home | ||||||||||||
| 0 cigarettes/d | 63.3 | 58.6 | Reference | 72.1 | 57.4 | Reference | 62.9 | 59.2 | Reference | 52.6 | 60.8 | Reference |
| 1–19 cigarettes/d | 13.3 | 10.3 | 1.30 (0.40 – 4.24) |
16.3 | 19.8 | 0.70 (0.27 – 1.81) |
17.1 | 19.6 | 0.83 (0.30 – 2.26) |
26.3 | 18.8 | 1.73 (0.53 – 5.70) |
| ≥ 20 cigarettes/d | 23.3 | 20.5 | 0.77 (0.34 – 1.73) |
11.6 | 22.8 | 0.41 (0.14 – 1.22) |
20.0 | 21.2 | 1.04 (0.40 – 2.71) |
21.1 | 21.1 | 1.29 (0.37 – 4.50) |
| Cohabitants > 4 persons | 23.3 | 24.8 | 1.33 (0.59 – 3.01) |
16.3 | 25.9 | 0.46 (0.18 – 1.20) |
19.4 | 25.2 | 0.76 (0.28 – 2.07) |
35.0 | 23.7 | 1.62 (0.57 – 4.62) |
| Siblings < 5 y | 30.0 | 30.6 | 1.17 (0.58 – 2.35) |
23.3 | 31.8 | 0.65 (0.28 – 1.52) |
30.6 | 30.5 | 0.95 (0.42 – 2.15) |
30.0 | 30.5 | 0.81 (0.29 – 2.25) |
| Social class | ||||||||||||
| I-III | 69.6 | 56.9 | Reference | 56.1 | 60.3 | Reference | 63.6 | 59.0 | Reference | 52.6 | 60.2 | Reference |
| IV-V | 30.4 | 43.1 | 0.76 (0.36 – 1.57) |
43.9 | 39.7 | 1.23 (0.56 – 2.71) |
36.4 | 41.0 | 1.06 (0.47 – 2.39) |
47.4 | 39.8 | 1.34 (0.50 – 3.55) |
| Intensive care unit | 3.2 | 16.9 | 0.13 (0.02 – 1.03) |
19.1 | 13.0 | 0.85 (0.34 – 2.12) |
16.2 | 13.7 | 1.38 (0.50 – 3.82) |
25.0 | 13.2 | 1.68 (0.50 – 5.65) |
| Non-penicillin susceptibleb | 0.0 | 46.0 | — | 60.0 | 25.9 | 1.89 (1.13 – 3.16) |
16.7 | 35.8 | 0.71 (0.22 – 2.38) |
0.0 | 38.1 | — |
| Death | 0.0 | 1.3 | — | 0.0 | 1.2 | — | 0.0 | 1.2 | — | 5.0 | 0.7 | 3.20 (0.20 – 51.19) |
| Risk medical conditions | 0.0 | 1.7 | — | 0.0 | 1.6 | — | 0.0 | 1.6 | — | 0.0 | 1.5 | — |
Notes: aAdjusted for age, vaccination with ≥ 1 dose of PCV7, attending day care or school, antibiotics prescribed within 30 d before the onset of clinical symptoms and previous respiratory infection. bAntibiogram was performed in cases diagnosed by culture (n = 115). Abbreviations: y, year; m, months; d, days; OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; IPD, invasive pneumococcal disease.
IPD due to serotype 19A was positively associated with respiratory infection in the previous month (aOR: 2.26, 95% CI:1.03–4.94), non-penicillin susceptible strains (aOR: 1.89, 95% CI:1.13–3.16) (Table 2) and pneumonia with empyema (aOR: 7.80, 95% CI:2.91–20.86) (Table 3) and negatively associated with the 24–59 mo age group (aOR: 0.19, 95% CI:0.09–0 0.41) (Table 2) and pneumonia without empyema (aOR: 0.19, 95% CI:0.05 to 0.66) (Table 3).
IPD due to serotype 3 was positively associated with vaccination (aOR: 4.87, 95% CI:2.05–11.59) (Table 2) and pneumonia with empyema (aOR: 3.01, 95% CI:1.22–7.43) (Table 3).
Serotype 7F/A was not associated with any of the factors studied.
Discussion
The results of this study show that age, PCV7 vaccination, attendance at day care or school, previous respiratory infection and non-susceptibility to penicillin were associated with IPD due to certain serotypes. Empyema was the clinical presentation most often associated with serotypes 1, 3 and 19A. The most frequent serotypes in our study were non PCV7 serotypes, namely serotypes 1, 19A, 3 and 7F/A, which represented 56.7% of cases. Serotypes 1, 19A, 3 and 7F are included in the 13-valent conjugate vaccine and serotypes 1 and 7F in the 10-valent vaccine.
IPD due to PCV7 serotypes had a higher risk of non-focal bacteremia and disease caused by non-penicillin susceptible strains, coinciding with other studies,10,14 and were also more frequent in children aged < 24 mo. Non PCV7 serotypes were more frequent in children aged 24–59 mo, although the differences were not significant, probably due to the low number of cases. PCV7 serotypes were less frequent in vaccinated children, reflecting high PCV7 effectiveness13,15 and in children attending day care or school, possibly because these children are more frequently vaccinated, due to pediatric advice.16
An increased incidence of pneumonia with empyema due to serotype 1 after the introduction of the PCV7 has been reported in some geographical areas.17-19 In our setting, serotype 1 was the most common serotype and was associated with pneumonia with empyema. It was observed more frequently in children aged 24–59 mo and children attending day care or school. A possible explanation could be the presence of clone ST306 in serotype 1 strains in our setting.20 This clone is susceptible to penicillin and may produce outbreaks in high density populations, and therefore close contact in day care facilities could facilitate the spread of the disease.21 Day care attendance helps maintain the circulation of pneumococci in the population and increases carrier status22,23 due to the greater number of people living in the environment and therefore may favor the development of microepidemics.21
After licensing of the PCV7, some regions saw an increase in IPD due to serotype 19A, making it the most frequent IPD-causing serotype.24-27 In our study, serotype 19A was the second most common serotype after serotype 1. However, in contrast to serotype 1, serotype 19A was associated with age < 23 mo and disease due to non-penicillin susceptible strains, as reported by other authors.7,18,27 Serotypes 3 and 19A were also associated with empyema, confirming the results of Byington et al.19 after the licensing of the PCV7 in the United States. Previous respiratory infection, which has been described as a risk factor for IPD28,29 was associated with serotype 19A. Tissue damage in respiratory tract cells caused by viral infections may explain this relationship. Serotype 19A is found in a large percentage of carriers, with different clonal expressions11,27,30 and has a high capacity to produce IPD. This may be explained, at least in part, by an imbalance in host defense capacities, such as those caused by respiratory infections.27,31
Unlike serotypes 1 and 19 A, serotype 3 are found in a large percentage of carriers and has low invasiveness.32 It has also been described as a serotype with high morbidity and mortality and greater involvement in adults.33,34 In our study, serotype 3 was the third most common IPD-causing serotype, probably because molecular techniques allowed more cases to be diagnosed than in other studies.20 Serotype 3 was more common in children aged 24–59 mo than in those aged < 24 mo, although the differences were not significant, possibly due to the small number of cases. Serotype 3 was associated with empyema. It was also associated with PCV7 vaccination and, although the finding must be confirmed in further studies, this association may be due to various factors. Bender et al.35 found a high percentage of children with necrotizing pneumonia due to serotype 3 who had received any dose of PCV7 in relation to children with pneumonia due to other serotypes, although the differences were not significant. PCV7 exercises natural selection in the ecological niche of the nasopharynx and has been described as one of the factors responsible for the replacement of PCV7 serotypes by non-PCV7 serotypes.7,36 Other reports have also observed an association between PCV7 vaccination and serotype 19A.24,26 In our region, PCV7 coverage is intermediate and the results could differ in regions with higher coverages.
Serotype 7F has also emerged after the introduction of the PCV7. It has been reported to be a potentially invasive serotype6 that acts as a primary pathogen, like serotype 1. In our study, serotype 7F/A serotype was the fourth most common serotype and was more frequent in cases with pneumonia than in other clinical presentations, although the differences were not significant, probably due to the low number of cases included. As reported by other studies18 all strains were susceptible to penicillin.
The main strength of this study is the use of real-time PCR, which increased diagnostic sensitivity and enabled identification of a greater proportion of serotypes that are difficult to culture. Clinical data were collected from the medical history and sociodemographic data through a single survey of parents at the time hospitalization. Vaccination data were collected from the health records of each child (vaccination card or health card, medical history, hospital and primary care record). Therefore, it is unlikely that information bias may have invalidated our results.
A limitation of the study is the small number of cases produced by some serotypes, which made it difficult to obtain significant differences. Likewise, although adjustment was made in the multivariate analysis for all variables that might reasonably have affected the appearance of IPD, we cannot discard the possibility of some residual confounding.
Methods
Cases of IPD in children aged 3–59 mo attended by the Vall d'Hebron and the Sant Joan de Deu university hospitals between January 2007 and December 2009 were included.
The case definition of IPD was clinical signs of infection together with isolation in cultures from normally sterile sites or detection of S. pneumoniae DNA. Cases with no information on the vaccination status or without serotyping were excluded. Serotyping of strains isolated by culture was performed by Quellung reaction or Dot-blot at the Spanish National Microbiology Centre37 and the study of serotypes in culture-negative cases was performed by real-time PCR at the Sant Joan de Deu university hospital.20 Antibiotic sensitivity was evaluated using an agar dilution technique. Susceptibility to penicillin was defined according to the 2008 meningeal cut-off point criteria of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute.38 Isolates with intermediate or resistant levels were defined as not susceptible.
Patient data were collected from medical records and by a questionnaire administered directly to parents or guardians at the time of diagnosis. The variables included in the study were: age, sex, clinical presentation, risk medical conditions, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, death, attendance at day care or school, previous antibiotic therapy, previous respiratory infection, breastfeeding, smoking exposure, number of inhabitants in the household, age of siblings and parental occupation. We also collected the serotype and antibiotic susceptibility of the microorganism.
The vaccination history was collected using health records (vaccination card or health card, medical history, hospital and primary care records). A child was considered vaccinated when they had received the full schedule for their age, having received the last dose (or only dose if this was the schedule corresponding to their age) of PCV7 ≥ 15 d before the onset of symptoms. Socioeconomic status was evaluated using the parental occupation according to the British classification.39 We considered two levels: high (class I-III) and low (class IV-V). When there were discrepancies between the classification of the father and the mother, the highest classification was used. Information on antibiotic treatment, previous respiratory infection and breastfeeding was collected for the month before the onset of pneumococcal disease.
The crude association between the variable studied and being a case of IPD was assessed using the Chi-square test. A two-tailed distribution was assumed for all p-values. Multivariate analysis using unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR), including independent variables associated with both the risk factor and IPD, with a cut-off point of p < 0.2. The variables age, vaccination, attendance at day care or school, previous respiratory infection and previous antibiotic treatment were also included in the multivariate analysis. The analysis was performed using SPSS v18 (SPSS Inc. USA).
In all cases informed oral consent was obtained from parents or guardians, as participation in the study resulted in no further intervention other than the medical attention required by each patient. All information collected was treated in confidence as established by Spanish legislation on observational studies. The Institute of Health Studies of the Generalitat of Catalonia and the Ethics Committee of the Foundation of the Hospital Sant Joan de Deu approved the study.
Conclusions
Associations were found between some risk factors and IPD caused by specific serotypes. IPD due to PCV7 serotypes was less frequent in cases vaccinated with PCV7 and was associated with disease caused by non-penicillin susceptible strains and non-focal bacteremia. Risk factors for serotype 1 were attending day care or school and age 24–59 mo. Risk factors for serotype 19A were age < 24 mo, previous respiratory infection and disease due to non-penicillin susceptible strains. PCV7 vaccination was a risk factor for serotype 3, although other, unstudied factors might have influenced this association. Serotypes 1, 3 and 19A were associated with empyema. Vaccination with vaccines including more serotypes could reduce the risk of IPD in our setting.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Fenoll of the National Center of Microbiology, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain and the parents of children included in the study for their collaboration. This work was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (Project number 06/1507), Caja Navarra Foundation, and Agency for the Management of Grants for University Research (AGAUR Grant numbers 2009/SGR 42, 2009/SGR 00136).
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- aOR
adjusted odds ratio
- CI
confidence interval
- ICU
intensive care unit
- IPD
invasive pneumococcal disease
- OR
odds ratio
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- PCV7
7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
- PCV10
10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
- PCV13
13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
- mo
month
- y
year
- d
day
Submitted
10/19/12
Accepted
10/30/12
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/vaccines/article/23270
References
- 1.Hausdorff WP, Bryant J, Kloek C, Paradiso PR, Siber GR. The contribution of specific pneumococcal serogroups to different disease manifestations: implications for conjugate vaccine formulation and use, part II. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:122–40. doi: 10.1086/313609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pilishvili T, Zell ER, Farley MM, Schaffner W, Lynfield R, Nyquist AC, et al. Risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccine use. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e9–17. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levine OS, Farley M, Harrison LH, Lefkowitz L, McGeer A, Schwartz B. Risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease in children: a population-based case-control study in North America. Pediatrics. 1999;103:E28. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.3.e28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hausdorff WP, Siber G, Paradiso PR. Geographical differences in invasive pneumococcal disease rates and serotype frequency in young children. Lancet. 2001;357:950–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04222-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brueggemann AB, Griffiths DT, Meats E, Peto T, Crook DW, Spratt BG. Clonal relationships between invasive and carriage Streptococcus pneumoniae and serotype- and clone-specific differences in invasive disease potential. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1424–32. doi: 10.1086/374624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sjöström K, Spindler C, Ortqvist A, Kalin M, Sandgren A, Kühlmann-Berenzon S, et al. Clonal and capsular types decide whether pneumococci will act as a primary or opportunistic pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:451–9. doi: 10.1086/499242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Picazo J, Ruiz-Contreras J, Casado-Flores J, Giangaspro E, Del Castillo F, Hernández-Sampelayo T, et al. Heracles Study Group Relationship between serotypes, age, and clinical presentation of invasive pneumococcal disease in Madrid, Spain, after introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine into the vaccination calendar. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011;18:89–94. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00317-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Martens P, Worm SW, Lundgren B, Konradsen HB, Benfield T. Serotype-specific mortality from invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae disease revisited. BMC Infect Dis. 2004;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weinberger DM, Harboe ZB, Sanders EAM, Ndiritu M, Klugman KP, Rückinger S, et al. Association of serotype with risk of death due to pneumococcal pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:692–9. doi: 10.1086/655828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fenoll A, Granizo JJ, Aguilar L, Giménez MJ, Aragoneses-Fenoll L, Hanquet G, et al. Temporal trends of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns in Spain from 1979 to 2007. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1012–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01454-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cohen R, Levy C, Bonnet E, Thollot F, Boucherat M, Fritzell B, et al. Risk factors for serotype 19A carriage after introduction of 7-valent pneumococcal vaccination. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Salut. Manual de vacunacions. Col·leció: Quaderns de salut pública, 14. 4th ed. Direcció General de Salut Pública. Barcelona 2006 Available at; http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/canalsalut/Home%20Canal%20Salut/Professionals/Temes_de_salut/Vacunacions/documents/manualvacunes06.pdf (accessed 14 September 2012).
- 13.Domínguez A, Ciruela P, García-García JJ, Moraga F, de Sevilla MF, Selva L, et al. Effectiveness of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in children aged 7-59 months. A matched case-control study. Vaccine. 2011;29:9020–5. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kyaw MH, Lynfield R, Schaffner W, Craig AS, Hadler J, Reingold A, et al. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance of the Emerging Infections Program Network Effect of introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1455–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitney CG, Pilishvili T, Farley MM, Schaffner W, Craig AS, Lynfield R, et al. Effectiveness of seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease: a matched case-control study. Lancet. 2006;368:1495–502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69637-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blanco A, Gimenez F, Asensi F, Bernaola E, de Juan F, García J, et al. Comité Asesor de Vacunas de la Asociación Española de Pediatría Vaccination schedule of the spanish association of pediatrics: recommendations 2004. An Pediatr (Barc) 2004;60:468–72. doi: 10.1016/s1695-4033(04)78307-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Isaacman DJ, McIntosh ED, Reinert RR. Burden of invasive pneumococcal disease and serotype distribution among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in young children in Europe: impact of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and considerations for future conjugate vaccines. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:e197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aguiar SI, Brito MJ, Gonçalo-Marques J, Melo-Cristino J, Ramirez M. Serotypes 1, 7F and 19A became the leading causes of pediatric invasive pneumococcal infections in Portugal after 7 years of heptavalent conjugate vaccine use. Vaccine. 2010;28:5167–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Byington CL, Korgenski K, Daly J, Ampofo K, Pavia A, Mason EO. Impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on pneumococcal parapneumonic empyema. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:250–4. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000202137.37642.ab. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Selva L, Ciruela P, Esteva C, de Sevilla MF, Codina G, Hernandez S, et al. Serotype 3 is a common serotype causing invasive pneumococcal disease in children less than 5 years old, as identified by real-time PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:1487–95. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Le Hello S, Watson M, Levy M, Marcon S, Brown M, Yvon JF, et al. Invasive serotype 1 Streptococcus pneumoniae outbreaks in the South Pacific from 2000 to 2007. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2968–71. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01615-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cohen R, Levy C, Bonnet E, Grondin S, Desvignes V, Lecuyer A, et al. Dynamic of pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage in children with acute otitis media following PCV7 introduction in France. Vaccine. 2010;28:6114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Millar EV, O’Brien KL, Zell ER, Bronsdon MA, Reid R, Santosham M. Nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Navajo and White Mountain Apache children before the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:711–6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181a06303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kaplan SL, Barson WJ, Lin PL, Stovall SH, Bradley JS, Tan TQ, et al. Serotype 19A Is the most common serotype causing invasive pneumococcal infections in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125:429–36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singleton RJ, Hennessy TW, Bulkow LR, Hammitt LL, Zulz T, Hurlburt DA, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease caused by nonvaccine serotypes among alaska native children with high levels of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine coverage. JAMA. 2007;297:1784–92. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.16.1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rodríguez MA, González AV, Gavín MA, Martínez FM, Marín NG, Blázquez BR, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease: association between serotype, clinical presentation and lethality. Vaccine. 2011;29:5740–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moore MR, Gertz RE, Jr., Woodbury RL, Barkocy-Gallagher GA, Schaffner W, Lexau C, et al. Population snapshot of emergent Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in the United States, 2005. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1016–27. doi: 10.1086/528996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ampofo K, Bender J, Sheng X, Korgenski K, Daly J, Pavia AT, et al. Seasonal invasive pneumococcal disease in children: role of preceding respiratory viral infection. Pediatrics. 2008;122:229–37. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim PE, Musher DM, Glezen WP, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Nahm WK, Wright CE. Association of invasive pneumococcal disease with season, atmospheric conditions, air pollution, and the isolation of respiratory viruses. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:100–6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.1.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muñoz-Almagro C, Ciruela P, Esteva C, Marco F, Navarro M, Bartolome R, et al. Catalan study group of invasive pneumococcal disease Serotypes and clones causing invasive pneumococcal disease before the use of new conjugate vaccines in Catalonia, Spain. J Infect. 2011;63:151–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hanage WP, Huang SS, Lipsitch M, Bishop CJ, Godoy D, Pelton SI, et al. Diversity and antibiotic resistance among nonvaccine serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage isolates in the post-heptavalent conjugate vaccine era. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:347–52. doi: 10.1086/510249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Smith T, Lehmann D, Montgomery J, Gratten M, Riley ID, Alpers MP. Acquisition and invasiveness of different serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae in young children. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:27–39. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800056648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mothibeli KM, du Plessis M, von Gottberg A, de Gouveia L, Adrian P, Madhi SA, et al. Group for Enteric, Respiratory and Meningeal Disease Surveillance in South Africa (GERMS-SA) An unusual pneumococcal sequence type is the predominant cause of serotype 3 invasive disease in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:184–91. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01011-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garcia-Vidal C, Ardanuy C, Tubau F, Viasus D, Dorca J, Liñares J, et al. Pneumococcal pneumonia presenting with septic shock: host- and pathogen-related factors and outcomes. Thorax. 2010;65:77–81. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.123612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bender JM, Ampofo K, Korgenski K, Daly J, Pavia AT, Mason EO, et al. Pneumococcal necrotizing pneumonia in Utah: does serotype matter? Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1346–52. doi: 10.1086/586747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muñoz-Almagro C, Jordan I, Gene A, Latorre C, García-Garcia JJ, Pallares R. Emergence of invasive pneumococcal disease caused by nonvaccine serotypes in the era of 7-valent conjugate vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:174–82. doi: 10.1086/524660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fenoll A, Jado I, Vicioso D, Casal J. Dot blot assay for the serotyping of pneumococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:764–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.3.764-766.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Eighteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S18. ISBN 1-5-56238-653-0. Wayne PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Office of Population Censuses Surveys. Classification of occupations. HMSO, London 1980. [Google Scholar]