Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 23.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2013 Nov 21;52(51):9294–9309. doi: 10.1021/bi401352h

Formiminoglutamase from Trypanosoma cruzi is an Arginase-Like Manganese Metalloenzyme

Yang Hai 1, Reilly Jane Dugery 1,a, David Healy 1, David W Christianson 1,*
PMCID: PMC3892564  NIHMSID: NIHMS543658  PMID: 24261485

Abstract

The crystal structure of formiminoglutamase from Trypanosoma cruzi (TcFIGase) is reported at 1.85 Å resolution. Although the structure of this enzyme was previously determined by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium (PDB accession code 2A0M), this structure was determined at low pH and lacked bound metal ions; accordingly, the protein was simply annotated as “arginase superfamily protein” with undetermined function. We show that reconstitution of this protein with Mn2+ confers maximal catalytic activity in the hydrolysis of formiminoglutamate to yield glutamate and formamide, thereby demonstrating that this protein is a metal-dependent formiminoglutamase. Equilibration of TcFIGase crystals with MnCl2 at higher pH yields a binuclear manganese cluster similar to that observed in arginase, except that the histidine ligand to the Mn2+A ion of arginase is an asparagine ligand (N114) to the Mn2+A ion of TcFIGase. The crystal structure of N114H TcFIGase reveals a binuclear manganese cluster essentially identical to that of arginase, but the mutant exhibits a modest 35% loss of catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM). Interestingly, when TcFIGase is prepared and crystallized in the absence of reducing agents at low pH, a disulfide linkage forms between C35 and C242 in the active site. When reconstituted with Mn2+ at higher pH, this oxidized enzyme exhibits a modest 33% loss of catalytic efficiency. Structure determinations of the metal-free and metal-bound forms of oxidized TcFIGase reveal that although disulfide formation constricts the main entrance to the active site, other structural changes open alternative channels to the active site that may help sustain catalytic activity.

Introduction

L-Histidine catabolism in prokaryotes and eukaryotes is achieved through one of six histidine utilization pathways as currently outlined in the MetaCyc database.1 These pathways are classified by the enzyme that catalyzes the first step, which is either a histidase (pathways I–III and VI) or a transaminase (pathways IV and V).2 In the transaminase pathways, L-histidine is converted into imidazolylpyruvate by either histidine-2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase in prokaryotes (pathway IV),3 or histidine-pyruvate aminotransferase in eukaryotes (pathway V),4 which is then reduced to imidazolyllactate.5 In the histidase pathways, L-histidine is converted into urocanic acid and ammonia.6,7 Pathways I–III then proceed in a similar manner through the key intermediate N-formimino-L-glutamate (also known as L-formiminoglutamic acid), which is subsequently degraded to form L-glutamate by a different enzyme in each pathway (Figure 1). Pathway III is mainly found in mammals,8 whereas pathways I and II are widely conserved in bacteria and operated by the hut gene.9 In pathway VI, 4-imidazolone-5-propionate, the intermediate shared with pathway I–III, is enzymatically oxidized into L-hydantoin-5-propionate,10,11 which is further processed in some bacteria by hydrolysis to form N-carbamyl-L-glutamate and thence L-glutamate.12

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pathways I–III for L-histidine catabolism. Formiminoglutamase catalyzes the final step in histidine utilization pathway I.

Formiminoglutamase (FIGase, also known as N-formimino-L-glutamate formiminohydrolase), catalyzes the final step in histidine utilization pathway I by catalyzing the hydrolysis of the imino group of N-formimino-L-glutamate to form L-glutamate and formamide (Figure 1). Formiminoglutamase belongs to the metal-dependent arginase/ureohydrolase superfamily, which also includes proclavaminic acid amidinohydrolase, agmatinase, guanidinobutyrase, and guanidinopropionase.13,14 The first member of this enzyme family to yield a crystal structure was rat arginase I15, which revealed a unique α/β fold and a binuclear manganese cluster required for catalysis. Subsequently determined crystal structures of other members of this family revealed similar tertiary structures and conservation of the catalytically-obligatory binuclear manganese cluster.1619

Two formiminoglutamase crystal structures have been determined by structural genomics consortia and are currently available in the Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org). Surprisingly, however, neither of these structures appears to be that of a functional metalloenzyme. The structure of formiminoglutamase from Vibrio cholerae (PDB entry 1XFK) does not contain bound metal ions, and the structure of formiminoglutamase from Bacilus subtilis (PDB entry 3M1R) contains a binuclear calcium cluster instead of the binuclear manganese cluster expected for members of the arginase/ureohydrolase family. Additionally, the crystal structure of a protein of undetermined function annotated as “arginase superfamily protein” from Trypanosoma cruzi was determined by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium20 (PDB entry 2A0M), but this protein does not contain bound metal ions. However, given that (1) this protein adopts the classic α/β arginase fold, (2) this protein exhibits 24% sequence identity with formiminoglutamase from B. subtilis, and (3) this protein contains conserved residues for Mn2+ coordination, we hypothesized that this protein is in fact T. cruzi formiminoglutamase (TcFIGase) crystallized in its metal-free state at pH 4.0. It should be noted that although atomic coordinates for these formiminoglutamase crystal structures are available in the Protein Data Bank, formal research papers describing the structure determinations have not been published.

Intriguingly, while members of the arginase/ureohydrolase family typically contain two conserved histidine and four conserved aspartate ligands to the binuclear manganese cluster, one of the histidine ligands is substituted by an asparagine ligand in formiminoglutamase from B. subtilis and TcFIGase. Although it might not be clear from the available crystal structures whether formiminoglutamases are actually Ca2+-dependent enzymes, or whether they are metalloenzymes at all, formiminoglutamases from Aerobacter aerogenes and B. subtilis exhibit maximal activity in the presence of Mn2+.21,22 Thus, despite the substitution of the putative metal ligand in TcFIGase, we hypothesized that it, too, is a manganese metalloenzyme.

Here, we demonstrate that TcFIGase exhibits maximal catalytic activity in the presence of Mn2+, thereby confirming that it is a manganese metalloenzyme, and we report the crystal structure of TcFIGase containing an intact binuclear manganese cluster. We also report the crystal structure of N114H TcFIGase, in which the mutation restores a histidine Mn2+ ligand as found in arginase and related ureohydrolases. Based on comparisons between TcFIGase and arginase, we propose a catalytic mechanism for the hydrolysis of formiminoglutamate. Finally, we report the crystal structure of TcFIGase in its oxidized form (TcFIGaseox), bearing a disulfide linkage between active site residues C35 and C242, and we show that TcFIGaseox exhibits nearly full catalytic activity despite structural changes triggered in the active site by disulfide bond formation.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Dipicolinic acid, manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate (≥99%), cobalt chloride hexahydrate (>99%), nickel chloride hexahydrate, L-arginine, α-isonitrosopropiophenone, 3-guanidinopropionic acid, 4-guanidinobuytric acid, agmatine sulfate salt, L-2-amino-3-guanidinopropionic acid hydrochloride, Nα-acetyl-L-arginine, L-homoarginine hydrochloride, potassium ferricyanide and sodium nitroprusside dihydrate were purchased from Sigma. Magnesium chloride hexahydrate (99%) was purchased from Acros Organics. Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (98%, TCEP) was purchased from Gold Biotechnology. α-Guanidinoglutaric acid was purchased from Cayman Chemical. 50% (w/v) PEG 3350 solution, 100% PEG 300 solution, and 3.4 M sodium malonate solution were purchased from Hampton Research. Chelex 100 resin (molecular biology grade) was purchased from Bio-Rad. L-Formiminoglutamic acid was purchased from Dalton Pharma Services (Canada). Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt (99.5%), zinc chloride (99.1%), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, and all other chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific.

Mutagenesis, expression and purification of TcFIGase

The pET plasmid encoding wild-type T. cruzi formiminoglutamase (TcFIGase) with an N-terminal His6-tag was kindly provided by Dr. Ethan Merritt of the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium at the University of Washington. Four mutants were generated using the QuickChange method (Stratagene) with the wild-type gene as template and the following primers (underlined bases indicate mutated codons): N114H, 5′-CCT TTT GTG ATT GGC GGA GGA CAC GAC CAG TCG GC-3′ (sense), 5′-GCC GAC TGG TCG TGT CCT CCG CCA ATC ACA AAA GG-3′ (antisense); R144K, 5′-GGA TGT TAA ACC ACC TCT GTC GG-3′ (sense), 5′-CCG ACA GAG GTG GTT TAA CAT CC-3′ (antisense); R144E, 5′-GGA TGT TGA ACC ACC TCT GTC GG-3′ (sense), 5′-CCG ACA GAG GTG GTT CAA CAT CC-3′ (antisense); R144A, 5′-CTC ATT TGG ATG TTG CCC CAC CTC TGT CGG-3′ (sense), 5′-CCG ACA GAG GTG GGG CAA CAT CCA AAT GAG-3′ (antisense). Mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.

TcFIGase was overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells in Lysogeny-Broth (LB) media or M9 minimal media (1x M9 salts, 10% casamino acids, 20 mM D-(+)-glucose, 2 mM MgSO4, 100 μM CaCl2) supplemented with 100 mg/L ampicillin. Expression was induced by 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Carbosynth) for 16 hours at 22 °C when OD600 reached 0.6–0.7. For minimal media growth, 100 μM MnCl2 was added into the culture 30 minutes before induction. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 minutes. The cell pellet was suspended in 50 mL of buffer A (50 mM K2HPO4 (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM TCEP). Cells were lysed by sonication on ice using a Sonifer 450 (Branson) and the cell lysate was further incubated with 5 μg/mL DNAse I (Sigma) and 6 μg/mL RNAse A (Roche Applied Science) at 4 °C for 30 min. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 26,895 g for 1 hour. The clear supernatant was applied to a Talon column (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) pre-equilibrated with buffer A. TcFIGase was purified with a 200 mL gradient from 10 mM imidazole to 300 mM imidazole. Pooled fractions were dialyzed into buffer B (20 mM K2HPO4 (pH 8.0), 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (BME) and 100 μM MnCl2) and subsequently loaded onto a 10 mL Q-HP anion exchange column (GE Healthcare). Protein was eluted with a 500 mL gradient from 0 mM NaCl to 800 mM NaCl. Estimated purity of protein samples was > 95% based on SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing TcFIGase were combined and concentrated using Amicon ultra filter units (Millipore) with 10 kDa molecular weight-cutoff followed by buffer exchange into buffer C (50 mM bicine (pH 8.5), 100 μM MnCl2, 1 mM TCEP) using PD-10 columns (GE Healthcare). Mutants were expressed in minimal media and purified as described for the wild-type enzyme. Oxidized TcFIGase (TcFIGaseox, bearing a disulfide linkage between C35 and C242) was serendipitously obtained by purifying the enzyme in the absence of reducing agent.

Attempts to use metal chelators such as EDTA and dipicolinic acid (DPA) to remove metal ions from wild-type enzyme were not successful. Apo-TcFIGase was prepared by gradually lowering the pH to 4.2 through stepwise dialysis: 20 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-(3-propanesulfonic acid) was used in the pH range 6.5–7.5; 20 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid was used in the pH range 5.5–6.5; and 20 mM sodium acetate was used in the pH range 4.2–5.5. Routinely, 5 mM BME was included in all dialysis buffers to prevent oxidation. Metal-depleted TcFIGase was then buffer-exchanged into Chelex resin pretreated buffer D (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM TCEP) by dialysis. Apo-TcFIGase was concentrated to 30 mg/mL, flash frozen by liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

Enzyme concentrations were determined by Bradford assay.23 Metal content was quantified by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) at the Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia (Athens, GA). Samples were extensively dialyzed against 10 mM bicine (pH 8.5) to remove free trace metal ions prior to analysis by ICP-AES.

Crystallography

Crystals of TcFIGase were prepared by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method at 21 °C. For TcFIGaseox and N114H TcFIGase, a 4 μL drop of protein solution [10 mg/mL protein, 50 mM bicine (pH 8.5), 100 μM MnCl2] was mixed with a 4 μL drop of precipitant solution [25% PEG 3350, 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 4.6)] on a siliconized cover slide and equilibrated against a 500 μL reservoir of precipitant solution. For wild-type TcFIGase, a 4 μL drop of protein solution [10 mg/mL protein, 50 mM bicine (pH 8.5), 100 μM MnCl2, 1 mM TCEP] was mixed with a 4 μL drop of precipitant solution [31% PEG 300, 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 4.9)] on a siliconized cover slide and equilibrated against a 500 μL reservoir of precipitant solution. Crystals first appeared after two days and grew to maximum size in one week. To obtain crystalline metal-bound enzyme, crystals of the apoenzyme were successively soaked with 5 – 20 mM MnCl2 in the corresponding precipitant solution with gradually increasing pH (in the pH range 6.0 – 8.5, 0.1 M sodium acetate was replaced by 0.1 M sodium malonate). Crystals were flash-cooled after transfer to a cryoprotectant solution consisting of the soaking solution augmented with 15% – 20% glycerol. Diffraction data were collected on our home X-ray source (Rigaku IV++ image plate area detector mounted on a Rigaku RU200HB rotating anode X-ray generator) and on beamline X29 at the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS, Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York). Diffraction data were integrated and scaled with HKL2000.24 In comparison with the structure of the arginase superfamily protein deposited in the PDB by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium (PDB entry 2A0M), crystals of N114H Mn2+2-TcFIGase and Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 6.0) similarly belonged to space group H3 and exhibited nearly identical unit cell parameters; crystals of Mn2+2-TcFIGase were similarly isomorphous except for a c-axis doubled in length and crystals of apo-TcFIGaseox and Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 8.5) were similarly isomorphous except for partial twinning. The doubled unit cell volume indicated that the asymmetric unit contained two monomers. A significant off-origin peak (84% of the origin peak) in the Patterson function (calculated with phenix.xtriage25) suggested that the two monomers were related by pseudotranslational symmetry. However, satisfactory solutions were generated for the rotation and translation functions in molecular replacement calculations, and structure refinement proceeded smoothly. Data collection and reduction statistics are listed in Table 1. Structures were determined by molecular replacement using the program PHASER26 as implemented in the CCP4 suite27 with the coordinates of wild-type apo-TcFIGase less ligand and solvent molecule as a search model. The degree of crystal twinning was assessed using the program phenix.xtriage.25 Iterative cycles of refinement and model building were performed using PHENIX25 and COOT.28 Solvent molecules were added in the final stages of refinement for each structure. Disordered segments not included in the final models include the N-terminus (M1-T5 in Mn2+2-TcFIGase and apo-TcFIGaseox; M1-R4 in N114H Mn2+2-TcFIGase and Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 6.0 and 8.5)), the C-terminus (K303-N308 in all structures), L147-G155 in apo- TcFIGaseox, P146-S154 in Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox at pH 6.0, and P145-S154 in Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox at pH 8.5. The side chain of active site residue C242 is disordered such that its Sγ atom occupies two positions in the final models of Mn2+2-TcFIGase and N114H Mn2+2-TcFIGase. Bijvoet difference Fourier maps were calculated with PHENIX.25 The quality of each final model was verified with PROCHECK and secondary structure was defined with DSSP.29,30 Refinement statistics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Data Collection and Refinement Statistics.

Enzyme Structure Mn2+2-TcFIGase (pH 8.0) Mn2+2-N114H TcFIGase (pH 7.5) Apo-TcFIGaseox (pH 4.6) Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 6.0) Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 8.5)
A. Data Collection
Wavelength (Å) 1.5418 1.075 1.075 1.5418 1.5418
Resolution limits (Å) 50.0–1.85 50.0–1.80 50.0–1.53 50.0–1.80 50.0–1.52
No. total/unique reflections 108650/44906 156011/24658 187951/40029 77546/24341 144418/40463
Space group H3 H3 H3 H3 H3
a, b, c (Å) 128.9, 128.9, 85.4 129.4, 129.4, 42.5 129.4, 129.4, 42.6 129.5, 129.5, 42.7 129.7, 129.7, 42.5
α, β, r (deg) 90, 90, 120 90, 90, 120 90, 90,120 90, 90, 120 90, 90, 120
Completenessa (%) 99.2 (98.8) 100 (100) 99.9 (100) 98.2 (97.3) 98.4 (95.1)
I/σIa 14.2 (2.0) 19.0 (2.9) 17.3 (2.7) 10.0 (2.3) 14.4 (2.7)
Rsyma,b 0.059 (0.438) 0.088 (0.754) 0.077 (0.527) 0.117 (0.466) 0.077 (0.422)
Redundancya 2.5 (2.4) 6.3 (6.1) 4.7 (4.5) 3.2 (3.1) 3.6 (3.2)
B. Refinement
No. of reflections used in refinement/test set 42190 (2123) 23858/1211 39028/1994 23603/1207 39990/2050
Rwork/Rfree(%)a,c 18.7/21.7 (24.0/30.8) 18.8/22.1 (24.6/28.2) 13.4/16.1 (22.6/25.5) 17.1/21.0 (21.7/25.6) 14.6/16.2 (40.0/46.1)
Twining fraction 0 0 0.25 0 0.42
Twin law N/A N/A h, -h-k, -l N/A h, -h-k, -l
No. of atomsd
protein 4571 2288 2231 2235 2212
solvent 265 93 160 178 122
Mn2+ 4 2 0 2 2
glycerol 6 0 0 0 0
Root-mean-square deviation
bonds (Å) 0.006 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.008
angles (deg) 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2
Average B factor (Å2)
main chain 27 35 16 24 21
side chain 29 37 20 27 23
solvent 32 38 24 30 24
metal ions 26 29 N/A 23 19
Ramachandran plot (%)
allowed 91.1% 89.8% 91.4% 90.7% 90.2%
additionally allowed 8.9% 10.2% 8.2% 9.3% 9.3%
generously allowed 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4%
disallowed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
a

Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution shell.

b

Rsym = ΣhΣi|I(h)i – <I(h)>|/ΣhΣiI(h)i, where I(h) is the intensity of reflection h, Σh is the sum over all reflections and Σi is the sum over i measurements of reflection h.

c

Rwork = Σ||Fo| – |Fc||/Σ|Fo| for reflections contained in the working set. Rfree = Σ||Fo| – |Fc||/Σ|Fo| for reflections contained in the test set held aside during refinement (5% of total). |Fo| and |Fc| are the observed and calculated structure factor amplitudes, respectively.

d

Per asymmetric unit.

Activity Assays

Ureohydrolase activity was monitored spectrophotometrically based on the formation of urea, using the colorimetric assay developed by Archibald.31 Briefly, 20 mM guanidino substrate was added to a solution of 50 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-propanesulfonic acid (pH 8.5), and the reaction was initiated by adding 100 WM TcFIGase in a total volume of 200 WL. The reaction was terminated after 1 hour using 30 WL of a 3:1 (v/v) concentrated acid/dye solution [H2SO4:H3PO4:H2O (1:3:1 v/v/v)/245 mM α-isonitrosopropiophenone in ethanol]. Samples were heated to 90 °C for 1 h in a thermocycler to ensure complete reaction of urea with the dye. Absorbance was measured at λ = 550 nm using an Agilent HP 8452A Diode Array Spectrophotometer.

L-Formiminoglutamase activity was monitored colorimetrically at 22 °C based on the protocol developed by Lund and Magasanik.21 Typically, 0.2 mL assay buffer [20 mM 1,3-bis(tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamino)propane, 20 mM N-cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid (pH 9.5)] containing enzyme (5–100 μM) was initiated by the addition of substrate L-formiminoglutamic acid (2–20 mM). The reaction was stopped by addition of 0.8 mL saturated sodium borate solution, followed by 0.2 mL of the chromophore reagent (4 g of sodium nitroprusside, 4 g of potassium ferricyanide, and 4 g of NaOH in 140 mL H2O). Absorbance was measured at λ= 485 nm after 30 min. All measurements were made in triplicate. Kinetic constants were calculated by fitting initial velocity data to either the Michaelis-Menton equation or the Hill equation using OriginPro 8.0 and are reported as mean ± standard deviation.

Metallo-substituted enzyme was prepared by incubating the apoenzyme with metal ions (2 mM MgCl2, CaCl2, MnCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, CuCl2, ZnCl2, FeCl2, or FeCl3) in 50 mM bicine (pH 8.5) and 2 mM TCEP on ice for at least one hour prior to dilution into assay buffer. All work with Fe2+ was performed anaerobically under a nitrogen atmosphere in an AtmosBag (Sigma). Dissolved oxygen was removed from ddH2O by sparging with N2.

RESULTS

Tertiary and Quaternary Structure

As previously found for the protein of undetermined function annotated as “arginase superfamily protein” from Trypanosoma cruzi by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium20 (PDB entry 2A0M), TcFIGase adopts the classic α/β arginase-deacetylase fold15 comprised of an eight-stranded parallel β-sheet (strand order 21387456) flanked by numerous α-helices (Figure 2a). Helices η2, A1, B, C, D, and E reside on one face and helices η1, A2, η3, F1, F2, η4, G and H reside on the other face of the central β-sheet. Two additional β-strands (βA and βB) are inserted between helix A2 and strand β2 to form a protruding β-hairpin, which contributes to the interface between monomers. The G111-G112 cis-peptide bond, which is contained in the widely-conserved GGDH motif in the ureohydrolase family, is also conserved in TcFIGase and lies at the edge of strand β3. This cis-peptide bond is believed to be important for positioning active site residues N114 and E277, known to be important for catalytic function as implicated in other ureohydrolases.19 Similar to eukaryotic arginases,15,3235 TcFIGase adopts a trimeric quaternary structure (Figure 2b). The buried solvent accessible surface area is 1884 Å2 between each monomer of the assembled homotrimer as determined by PISA.36 In contrast with the eukaryotic arginases, in which the S-shaped C-terminal polypeptide dominates intermonomer contacts in the trimer, the N-terminus of TcFIGase makes significant intermonomer interactions, which is more similar to trimer assembly in proclavaminic acid amidinohydrolase,16 agmatinase,17 guanidinobutyrase, and guanidinopropionase.18

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Stereoview of the Mn2+2-TcFIGase monomer. Secondary structure elements are defined by DSSP;30 α-helices are red and β-strands are blue (β strands 1–8) or purple (β-strands βA and βB). The Mn2+ ions are shown as white spheres. (b) Top view (left) and side view (right) of the Mn2+2-TcFIGase trimer.

Active Site Structure

The crystallization of TcFIGase exclusively yields the metal-free apoenzyme due to the fact that it crystallizes only at very low pH (pH < 5). This accounts for the complete lack of active site metal ions in the 1.6 Å resolution crystal structure determined by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium20 and the resultant misannotation of the protein (PDB entry 2A0M). To obtain the crystal structure of the metal-bound enzyme, crystals of wild-type TcFIGase were soaked with 5 mM MnCl2 at pH 8.0. The binding of two Mn2+ ions in the active site was confirmed by two strong peaks in the Bijvoet difference Fourier map shown in Figure 3a. Each Mn2+ ion is coordinated with octahedral or distorted-octahedral geometry: the Mn2+A ion is coordinated by N114 Oδ, D138 Oδ2, D142 Oδ2, D228 Oδ2, and two solvent molecules, one of which bridges Mn2+A and Mn2+B and donates a hydrogen bond to D142 Oδ1; the Mn2+B ion is coordinated by H140 Nδ, D228 Oδ2, D138 Oδ1, D230 Oδ1 and Oδ2 in symmetric bidentate fashion, and the metal-bridging solvent molecule. Metal binding does not cause any global conformational changes, and the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) deviation between apo-TcFIGase and Mn2+2-TcFIGase is 0.18 Å for 278 Cα atoms as calculated with MacPymol.37 However, metal binding triggers some local structural changes in the active site, in that metal ligands undergo varying degrees of conformational changes to enable inner-sphere coordination of Mn2+A and Mn2+B (Figure 3b). In contrast, relatively minimal conformational changes accompany metal binding to the metal-free ureohydrolases agmatinase from D. radiodurans and human arginase I.17,38 It is possible, however, that the alternative conformations observed for metal ligands in apo-TcFIGase result from the low pH of the apoenzyme crystal structure determination.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Bijvoet difference Fourier map (grey, contoured at 5σ) of Mn2+ ions and simulated annealing omit map (blue, contoured at 4σ) of Mn2+-bound solvent molecules in the active site of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (pH 8.0). Atoms are color-coded as follows: C = white, N = blue, O = red, Mn2+ = pink spheres, solvent = red spheres. Metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions are represented by blue and green dashed lines, respectively. Note that the side chain thiol group of C242 is disordered between two positions. (b) Superposition of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (color coded as in (a)) and apo-TcFIGase (PDB entry 2A0M, color coded as in (a) except that C = yellow). (c) Superposition of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (color coded as in (a)) and H101N rat arginase I (PDB entry 1P8P, tan). TcFIGase and rat arginase I residue labels are black and red, respectively.

Interestingly, the conformation of N114 in Mn2+2-TcFIGase is comparable to that of N101 in the 2.5 Å resolution crystal structure of H101N rat arginase I (PDB entry 1P8P, which updated a previous structure determination (PDB entry 3RLA) in which the metal ligand was not characterized by well-defined electron density).39,40 The superposition of Mn2+2-TcFIGase and H101N rat arginase I reveals almost identical metal coordination geometries, with the exception that in H101N rat arginase I the Mn2+A site is only half-occupied and non-protein ligands (solvent molecules) are not observed, probably due to the lower resolution of the structure determination (Figure 3c). The Mn2+A-Mn B2+ separation of 3.2 Å in Mn2+2-TcFIGase is comparable to that observed in H101N rat arginase I (3.1 Å) as well as the Mn2+A-Mn B2+ separations generally observed in wild-type ureohydrolases.1518,3235 In Mn2+2-TcFIGase, the Mn2+A ion is coordinated by N114 Oδ with a separation of 2.2 Å; in H101N rat arginase I, the corresponding N101 Oδ---Mn2+A separation is 2.1 Å. Additionally, “second shell” interactions are similar in both enzymes. In TcFIGase, the N114 Nδ-H groups donates hydrogen bonds to the side chain hydroxyl group of S117 and a water molecule; in turn, this water molecule hydrogen bonds with the side chains of S226 and N136. In H101N rat arginase I, the N101 Nδ-H group donates a hydrogen bond to a water molecule, which in turn hydrogen bonds with S230.

Structure of N114H TcFIGase

To restore the characteristic metal binding motif found in most binuclear metalloureohydrolases, i.e., to engineer the metal cluster of TcFIGase so as to resemble that of arginase,15,33 N114H TcFIGase was prepared. The 1.80 Å-resolution X-ray crystal structure of this mutant reveals a nearly fully occupied binuclear manganese cluster (Mn2+A occupancy = 75%, Mn2+B occupancy = 100%), as confirmed in the simulated annealing omit map of Figure 4a. The side chain Nδ atom of H114 coordinates to Mn2+A with a separation of 2.2 Å, and the Nε-H group is a bifurcated hydrogen bond donor to the side chain hydroxyl groups of S117 and S226. In rat arginase I and human arginase I, a single serine residue, S230, accepts a hydrogen bond from the Nε-H group of the corresponding Mn2+A ligand, H101.15,41 The manganese coordination polyhedra are otherwise unchanged compared with wild-type TcFIGase (Figure 4b) and resemble those observed in other unliganded ureohydrolases, including B. caldovelox arginase,42 L. mexicana arginase,35 S. clavuligerus proclavaminic acid amidinohydrolase,16 P. aeruginosa guanidinopropionase, and P. aeruginosa guanidinobutyrase.18

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) Simulated annealing omit maps of Mn2+ ions (grey, contoured at 3σ) and metal-bound solvent molecules (purple, contoured at 5σ) in the active site of N114H Mn2+2-TcFIGase (pH 7.5). Atoms are color-coded as follows: C = white, N = blue, O = red, Mn2+ = pink spheres, solvent = red spheres. Metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions are represented by blue and green dashed lines, respectively. Note that the side chain thiol group of C242 is disordered between two positions. (b) Superposition of N114H Mn2+2-TcFIGase (color coded as in (a)) and wild-type Mn2+2-TcFIGase (color coded as in (a) except that C, Mn2+ = cyan).

Structure of Oxidized TcFIGase (TcFIGaseox)

When apo-TcFIGase is prepared and crystallized in the absence of reducing agents, the 1.53 Å-resolution structure reveals the formation of a disulfide linkage between C35 and C242 in the active site. The metal-bound form of this oxidized protein, Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox, is prepared by soaking apoenzyme crystals in a buffer solution containing 20 mM MnCl2. The 1.8 Å-resolution crystal structure of metal-bound TcFIGaseox determined at pH 6.0 reveals one strong peak and one weak peak in the Bijvoet difference Fourier map – the Mn2+B site is fully occupied and the Mn2+A site is 40% occupied (Figure 5a). The overall structure of metal-bound TcFIGaseox is generally similar to that of Mn2+2-TcFIGase, with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.13 Å for 241 Cα atoms. However, two major conformational changes are triggered by disulfide bond formation (Figure 5b): first, helix A1 (E33-R37, which contains C35 in the disulfide linkage) and its flanking loops shift ~4 Å toward the active site; second, the surface loop P146-S154 becomes disordered. As a result of these conformational changes, the original entrance to the active site is partially blocked by helix A1 (especially by N38 and the C35-C242 disulfide linkage). However, two possible alternative entrances are formed as calculated with the program MOLE:43 one is adjacent to the original entrance and results from the shift of R144, and the second results from the disorder of the P146-S154 loop (Figure 6a). Comparison of the atomic displacement parameters of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (pH 8.0) and Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 8.5) reveals that loop P146-S154 and helix A1 exhibit significant flexibility in both structures (Figure 6b). Therefore, disulfide bond formation appears to be a fortuitous consequence of this flexibility. The geometry of the C35-C242 disulfide linkage is +LHSpiral as defined by Schmidt and colleagues,44 which is not characteristic of any particular function.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Bijvoet difference Fourier map (grey, contoured at 3σ) of Mn2+ ions and simulated annealing omit map (purple, contoured at 3σ) of Mn2+-bound solvent molecules in the active site of wild-type Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 6.0). Atoms are color-coded as follows: C = white, N = blue, O = red, Mn2+ = pink spheres, solvent = red spheres. Metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions are represented by blue and green dashed lines, respectively. (b) Superposition of the Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox monomer (pH 6.0, purple) and the Mn2+2-TcFIGase monomer (white); dotted lines indicate disordered polypeptide segments. Major conformational changes occur for helix A1 (dark pink (oxidized state), cyan (reduced state)) and the P146-S154 loop in response to disulfide bond formation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) Structural changes in active site access triggered by disulfide bond formation in Mn2+2-TcFIGase. The original active site entrance is indicated by a green surface (left image). Following disulfide bond formation in Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox, this entrance becomes constricted and two new entrances (blue and red surfaces) become accessible (right image). Selected residues lining the entrance surface are shown as stick figures and Mn2+ ions are shown as pink spheres. Active site entrance surfaces were calculated using MOLE.43 (b) Cartoon representation of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (pH 8.0, left) and Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (pH 8.5, right) showing the atomic displacement parameters coded by thickness of the main chain and a color gradient from blue (low disorder) to red (high disorder). The red dotted line indicates the disordered P146-S154 loop.

Notably, the binuclear metal cluster is influenced by disulfide bond formation in TcFIGox (Figure 7a). Although the Mn2+A-Mn B2+ separation remains at 3.1 Å and the N114 Oδ atom remains coordinated to Mn2+ A, the occupancy of Mn2+A is reduced to 40%. Additionally, the second water molecule coordinated to Mn2+A as the sixth ligand in the structure of Mn2+2-TcFIGase is sterically displaced by the Nδ-H group of N114, which donates a hydrogen bond to the metal-bridging solvent molecule; while the N114 Nδ atom is 3.0 Å away from E273, it is poorly oriented for hydrogen bond formation. The Nδ atom of N114 is also 2.5 Å away from Mn2+A, which is too long for an inner-sphere coordination interaction that would also require the unlikely ionization of the carboxamide side chain.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Close-up view of active site from the superposition of Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox (C = white) with Mn2+2-TcFIGase (C = cyan). Metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions in Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox are represented by red and green dashed lines, respectively. (b) Simulated annealing omit maps (purple, contoured at 3σ) of Mn2+ ions and Mn2+-bound solvent molecules observed in Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox soaked in a buffer solution containing 20 mM MnCl2 at pH 8.5. Atoms are color-coded as follows: C = white, N = blue, O = red, Mn2+ = pink spheres, solvent = red spheres. Metal coordination and hydrogen bond interactions are represented by blue and green dashed lines, respectively. Note the reduced Mn2+A occupancy and conformational change of former Mn2+A ligand D142.

To increase the occupancy of Mn2+A, crystals of apo-TcFIGaseox were soaked in a buffer solution containing 20 mM MnCl2 at pH 8.5. However, the resulting crystal structure reveals that although Mn2+B remains fully bound, Mn2+A binds with only 30% occupancy (Figure 7b). Intriguingly, lower Mn2+A occupancy is accompanied by the conformational change of former Mn2+A ligand D142, which swings away from the metal site to accept hydrogen bonds from N38 and R144. Consequently, a solvent molecule coordinates to Mn2+A at the site formerly occupied by D142. The flexibility of D142 could be mediated in part by its proximity to the highly flexible P146-S154 loop (Figure 6b). Other changes observed in the structure include a shorter Mn2+A-Mn B2+ separation of 2.9 Å, and asymmetric metal coordination by the bridging solvent molecule with Mn2+A-O and Mn2+B-O separations of 2.1 Å and 2.4 Å, respectively. The N114 Oδ---Mn2+A interaction is weakened with a separation of 2.6 Å, which is too long to be considered inner-sphere metal coordination.

Metal Content Analysis

The metal ion content of TcFIGase was measured using inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Table 2). Both wild-type TcFIGase and N114H TcFIGase as expressed and purified from LB media exhibit heterogeneity in terms of their metal ion content – each contains nearly one equivalent Mn2+ per monomer, but wild-type TcFIGase is contaminated with Fe2+ and N114H TcFIGase is contaminated with Co2+. To minimize the contamination by adventitious divalent metal ions, expression of wild-type TcFIGase from minimal media supplemented with MnCl2 results in the incorporation of only one equivalent of Mn2+ into each monomer. The metal ion content of TcFIGaseox is comparable to that found in the reduced form, TcFIGase. Notably, ICP-AES analysis suggests that only one site in the binuclear metal cluster binds Mn2+ tightly in solution. Based on the crystallographic studies outlined in the previous section, it is likely that this corresponds to the Mn2+B ion; it is possible that the Mn2+A ion is bound more weakly than the Mn2+B ion under physiological conditions.

Table 2.

Metal content analysis.

Metal : protein molar ratio
Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Mg Ca
Wild-type TcFIGase 0.84 0.22 0.04 0.003 0.008 0.04 0.005 0.01
N114H TcFIGase 0.85 0.03 0.24 0.004 0.004 0.03 0.08 0.03
Wild-type TcFIGase after treatment with metal ion chelatorsa 0.80 0.31 0.05 0.002 0.005 0.01 0.003 0.04
Wild-type TcFIGase, pH 4.2b 0.11 0.20 0.04 0.0002 0.002 0.008 n.d.c 0.01
Wild-type TcFIGaseox 0.84 0.14 0.08 0.0014 0.004 0.02 n.d. 0.004
Wild-type TcFIGase, minimal media + MnCl2 d 1.05 0.02 0.03 0.0004 n.d. 0.03 0.10 0.001
a

Treatment with 55 mM DPA and 80 mM EDTA for 24 hours; chelators then dialyzed out prior to analysis.

b

The pH was gradually lowered to 4.2 by dialysis and then raised to 8.0 for ICP-AES.

c

n.d., not detected.

d

Protein expressed and purified from minimal media supplemented with 100 μM MnCl2 upon induction.

Measurement of Enzyme Kinetics

To evaluate the possibility that TcFIGase might exhibit ureohydrolase activity, given its structural similarity to arginase and other related ureohydrolases, different guanidinium derivatives were tested as potential substrates using the colorimetric ureohydrolase assay developed by Archibald.31 However, no urea formation was detected in assays that would have detected 0.4 micromoles of urea formed per minute with the following substrates: L-arginine, agmatine, L-acetylarginie, α-guanidinoglutaric acid, L-homoarginine, L-2-amino-3-guanidinopropionic acid, 3-guanidinopropionic acid, and 4-guanidinobutyric acid.

Instead, TcFIGase exclusively exhibits formiminoglutamate activity as measured using the colorimetric L-formiminoglutamate assay developed by Lund and Magasanik (Table 3).21 Wild-type TcFIGase expressed and purified from LB media displays the following steady-state kinetic parameters: kcat = 200 ± 20 s−1 KM = 40 ± 10 mM, and kcat/KM = 5200 ± 200 M, −1s−1. The catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) is approximately 2-fold higher than that of metal-free wild-type TcFIGase reconstituted exclusively with Mn2+, which exhibits kcat = 110 ± 20 s−1, KM = 50 ± 10 mM, and kcat/KM = 2300 ± 300 M−1s−1. While the KM value measured for TcFIGase is somewhat high, it is comparable to that measured for the formiminoglutamases from Aerobacter aerogenes (KM = 40 mM at pH 8.5) and Bacillus subtilis (KM = 39 mM at pH 7.4).21,22 These values are, however, higher than the KM value of 4.3 mM measured for formiminoglutamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.45 Nevertheless, these results confirm that the protein of undetermined function annotated as “arginase superfamily protein” from Trypanosoma cruzi by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium20 (PDB entry 2A0M) is in fact a formiminoglutamase.

Table 3.

Steady-State Kinetics at pH 9.5.

Enzyme kcat (s−1 ) KM (mM) kcat/KM (M−1s−1)
Wild-type TcFIGasea 200 ± 20 40 ± 10 5200 ± 200
Wild-type TcFIGaseoxa 140 ± 20 40 ± 20 3500 ± 200
Wild-type TcFIGaseb 140 ± 40 100 ± 30 1400 ± 200
N114H TcFIGasea 80 ± 10 20 ± 10 3400 ± 200
R144E TcFIGaseb,d 0.05 ± 0.02 9 ± 4 5.2 ± 0.6
R144A TcFIGaseb 3.2 ± 0.5 90 ± 10 37 ± 2
R144K TcFIGaseb 190 ± 20 160 ± 20 1200 ± 100
Mn2+-TcFIGasec 110 ± 20 50 ± 10 2300 ± 300
Co2+-TcFIGasec 50 ± 10 70 ± 20 800 ± 200
Ni2+-TcFIGasec 40 ± 10 90 ± 20 400 ± 100
Mg2+-TcFIGasec 90 ± 40 200 ± 60 400 ± 30
a

Enzyme expressed and purified from LB media.

b

Enzyme expressed and purified from minimal media supplemented with 100 μM MnCl2 prior to induction.

c

Enzyme prepared by reconstituting the metal-free apoenzyme with divalent metal ions.

d

Apparent KM from Hill equation due to allosteric behavior.

The oxidized form of the wild-type enzyme, TcFIGaseox, exhibits 67% catalytic efficiency compared to wild-type TcFIGase. The slightly lower activity of TcFIGaseox could be a consequence of the narrowed active site entrance. Regardless, formation of the C35-C242 disulfide linkage does not appear to have a significant influence on catalysis. Neither of these cysteine residues are conserved among formiminoglutamases from different species and are instead substituted by small aliphatic amino acids residues (mainly valine and alanine) (Figure 8). Hence, the C35-C242 disulfide linkage is probably an artifact rather than a functional allosteric linkage for the regulation of enzyme activity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Sequence alignment of TcFIGase with FIGase enzymes identified in different bacteria. Sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega52 and displayed with Jalview.53 Highly conserved active site residues (identity ≥ 90%) are highlighted in red. Moderately conserved active site residues (identity < 90%) are highlighted in green. C35 and C242 (which can form a disulfide linkage in T. cruzi) and their equivalent residues in other species are highlighted in cyan. Other conserved residues (identity > 90%) are highlighted in blue. Uniprot accession codes for aligned sequences are as follows: Trypanosoma cruzi (Q4DSA0), Nocardia farcinica (Q5Z0G1), Macrococcus caseolyticus, (B9E7J8), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Q9HZ59), Staphylococcus aureus (P99158), Salmonella typhi (Q8Z899), Klebsiella pneumonia (B5XZ82), Bacillus subtilis (P42068), Rhodococcus opacus (C1BBD1), Ralstonia solanacearum (Q8XW30), Vibrio cholera (Q9KSQ2), Psychrobacter cryohalolentis (Q1Q9E3), Photobacterium profundum (Q6LQ58).

The restoration of an authentic, “arginase-like” Mn2+A coordination polyhedron does not significantly affect catalysis: N114H TcFIGase exhibits 65% catalytic efficiency compared to wild-type TcFIGase (Table 3). Thus, asparagine and histidine metal ligands appear to be easily interchangeable in the metalloureohydrolase active site, as first demonstrated in structure-function studies of H101N rat arginase I.39,40,46

Inspection of the TcFIGase active site reveals a single arginine residue, R144 (Figure 3a), that is strictly conserved among formiminoglutamase enzymes from different organisms (Figure 8). To investigate the possible function of this residue, the R144A, R144E and R144K mutants were prepared and assayed (Table 3). Each mutant was expressed and purified from minimal media supplemented with MnCl2 to exclude potential contamination by other metal ions. The sole incorporation of Mn2+ via this method was verified by ICP-AES analysis of the wild-type enzyme (Table 2). The R144A mutation causes a 38-fold reduction in catalytic efficiency, and the R144E mutation causes an even more severe 269-fold reduction in catalytic efficiency, relative to that measured for the wild-type enzyme. Notably, the R144K mutation retains near-normal catalytic efficiency (85% compared with the wild-type enzyme). These data suggest that the positively-charged R144 side chain is critical for maximal catalysis.

Finally, to study the metal ion preference for catalysis by TcFIGase, apo-TcFIGase was reconstituted with different divalent metal ions and the catalytic activities of these metallosubstituted enzymes were measured (Figure 9). ICP-AES measurements verified the preparation of apo-TcFIGase prior to reconstitution with different metal ions; equilibration of protein samples at low pH, and not treatment with metal ion chelators, successfully enabled metal ion dissociation. The apoenzyme retains 4% residual activity, which presumably results from a low concentration of residual Mn2+ ions contained in the protein sample as detected by ICP-AES (Table 2). The Mn2+-reconstituted enzyme exhibits 67% activity compared to the native wild-type enzyme. The inability to restore full activity by reconstituting the metal-free apoenzyme with Mn2+ suggests that the acidic pH treatment required to dissociate active site metal ions might cause some irreversible damage to the protein. This would be consistent with our observation that the apoenzyme is less stable than the metal-loaded enzyme and more susceptible to precipitation. However, in comparison with all other divalent metal ions tested, reconstitution of the apoenzyme with Mn2+ confers the highest level of catalytic activity. Therefore, Mn2+ is most likely to be the natural cofactor of TcFIGase. Furthermore, titration of metal-free TcFIGase with increasing concentrations of Mn2+ indicates that maximal activity requires the binding of more than one metal ion (Figure 10), suggesting that a binuclear manganese cluster is required for catalysis.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Dependence of TcFIGase activity on metal ions. Metal-free apoenzyme was prepared by depleting the metal ions at low pH using wild-type enzyme expressed and purified from LB media. Metal-substituted TcFIGase was reconstituted with two equivalents metal ions and assayed for activity using 10 mM substrate. Activity was compared in terms of initial velocity.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Dependence of TcFIGase catalysis on metal ion stoichiometry. Metal-free enzyme (20 μM) was incubated with increasing molar equivalents (eq) of divalent metal ions in assay buffer at 4 °C for 30 minutes. The reaction was initiated by addition of 1 mM substrate and monitored as described in the text. Maximal catalysis requires ca. 2 Mn2+ ions per monomer.

DISCUSSION

Metal Ion Function and Evolutionary Relationships

The results outlined above demonstrate that TcFIGase is a manganese-dependent metallohydrolase, which is consistent with the essential catalytic role of Mn2+ in the ureohydrolase family of metalloenzymes as well as previous findings with formiminoglutamases from other species.21,22 The depletion of Mn2+ to yield apo-TcFIGase leads to a dramatic loss of activity, as shown in Figure 9. Catalytic activity is restored by the incubation of apo-TcFIGase with the divalent metal ions Mg2+, Mn2+, Co2+ and Ni2+, with maximal activity resulting from incubation with Mn2+. However, in contrast with a binuclear manganese ureohydrolase such as arginase, in which a binuclear manganese cluster was first definitively demonstrated by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy,47 TcFIGase contains only 1 equivalent of Mn2+ bound tightly per monomer in solution as determined by ICP-AES (Table 2). Even so, maximal catalytic activity requires ca. 2 Mn2+ ions bound per TcFIGase monomer (Figure 10). Furthermore, the X-ray crystal structure shows that both the A and B metal binding sites in TcFIGase are capable of binding Mn2+ ions when crystals of apo-TcFIGase are soaked in a buffer solution containing millimolar Mn2+ ion concentrations.

To account for the differences between ICP-AES measurements on the one hand, and Mn2+ titration studies and X-ray crystal structures on the other hand, we hypothesize that the Mn2+B ion is more tightly bound and the Mn2+A ion is more weakly bound. Resultantly, the Mn2+A ion is more labile. This metal binding behavior is in accord with the observation that the Mn2+B site is preferentially the first to be occupied when crystals of apo-TcFIGase are soaked in a Mn2+-containing buffer solution as the pH is gradually raised (data not shown); it is additionally in accord with crystal structures of Mn2+2-TcFIGaseox, in which the Mn2+B occupancy is always full whereas the Mn2+A occupancy is variable (Figure 7). This postulate is also consistent with ICP-AES measurements showing that 1 equivalent of Mn2+ remains bound per monomer after extensive dialysis and treatment with metal ion chelators. It is interesting to note that similar behavior is observed for metal ion binding to rat arginase I, from which only Mn2+A can be extracted by treatment with metal ion chelators.39 However, contrasting behavior is observed for arginase from B. caldovelox, from which the Mn2+B ion is more weakly bound and preferentially removed by treatment with EDTA.42 In further contrast, both metal ions of human arginase I are readily removed by dialysis against DPA.38

To investigate whether the weak binding of the Mn2+A ion of Mn2+2-TcFIGase is attributable to N114, N114H TcFIGase was prepared. This amino acid substitution restores an authentic arginase-like metal coordination polyhedron. Interestingly, Cavalli and colleagues46 show that H101N rat arginase I exhibits 50% activity compared to wild-type rat arginase I; following dialysis, the metal-protein stoichiometry is measured to be 3.3 Mn2+ ions/trimer, suggesting weaker binding of the Mn2+A ion. Although this result might suggest that a histidine ligand is more favorable than an asparagine ligand to the Mn2+A ion, the N114H substitution in TcFIGase does not enhance Mn2+A affinity, since protein-metal stoichiometry in the mutant is comparable to that of the wild-type enzyme (Table 2). In the crystalline mutant, too, the Mn2+B ion remains fully occupied whereas the Mn2+A ion is only partially occupied.

Amino acid sequence alignment of FIGase enzymes from different organisms suggests that the Mn2+A site is more variable than the Mn2+B site (Figure 8): specifically, the histidine ligand to Mn2+A is substituted by asparagine in the FIGase enzymes from T. cruzi and B. subtilis. Interestingly, the bridging aspartate ligand D228 of TcFIGase appears as cysteine in the FIGase enzymes from S. aereus, P. aeruginosa, M. caseolyticus and R. solanacearum. The greater evolutionary potential of Mn2+A site ligands and weaker binding of Mn2+A is consistent with the fact that only the Mn2+B site is conserved among members of the greater arginase/deacetylase superfamily (the Mn2+B site of arginase-like enzymes such as TcFIGase corresponds to the Zn2+ site of histone deacetylases).19,48 The arginases and deacetylases share a common α/β fold and thus likely evolved from a common metallohydrolase ancestor.19,49 Therefore, FIGase, which shows notable variability in the Mn2+A binding site among the ureohydrolases, could represent a “snapshot” of an intermediate evolutionary state for the metal binding site between the arginases and the deacetylases.

Structural Insights on the Catalytic Mechanism

Despite the absence of a structure of TcFIGase complexed with a substrate or transition state analogue, important mechanistic inferences can be drawn from the structure of inactivated B. caldovelox arginase complexed with L-arginine42 and the structures of arginase from various organisms complexed with the boronic acid substrate analogue 2(S)-amino-6-boronohexanoic acid.3335,50 This analogue binds to arginase as the tetrahedral boronate anion, which mimics the tetrahedral intermediate and its flanking transition states in the arginase reaction. By analogy with ligand binding in the active site of arginase, we have modeled the binding of substrate L-formiminoglutamate in the active site of Mn2+2-TcFIGase (Figure 11). This model shows that four residues universally conserved among FIGase enzymes (Figure 8) – R144, N38, S154 and E273 – could be involved in substrate binding. The negatively charged carboxylate side chain of E273 may play a role in substrate recognition by interacting with the positively charged iminium group of L-formiminoglutamate; the corresponding glutamate residue of arginase similarly interacts with the positively charged guanidinium group of L-arginine.42,50 The side chain of N38 is well positioned to make a direct hydrogen bond with the α-carboxylate group of L-formiminoglutamate, and the side chains of S154, E273, and C35 may also make water-mediated hydrogen bonds with this α-carboxylate group as shown in Figure 11. Finally, R144 is well positioned to form a salt link with the side chain carboxylate group of L-formiminoglutamate. Indeed, the catalytic activities of R144A, R144E, and R144K TcFIGase indicate that a positive charge at this position is crucial for maximal catalysis (Table 3).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Hypothetical model of substrate binding in TcFIGase. One water molecule originally in the active site is deleted and the conformations of R144 and C242 are manually adjusted to accommodate the substrate. Metal coordination interactions are shown as blue dashed lines and hydrogen bonds are indicated by green dashed lines. The Bürgi–Dunitz trajectory for nucleophilic attack by the metal-bridging hydroxide ion at the substrate imino group is indicated by a black dashed line.

Since two solvent molecules are bound to the binuclear manganese cluster of TcFIGase, it could be questioned as to which of these solvent molecules is the catalytic nucleophile. However, the pKa of a metal-bridging solvent molecule will be lower than that of a solvent molecule coordinated to just a single metal ion; therefore, a higher concentration of nucleophilic hydroxide ions would occupy a metal-bridging position compared with a single-metal coordination position. Also notable is the fact that as modeled in Figure 11, the lone electron pair of the presumed metal-bridging hydroxide ion is aligned with the Bürgi-Dunitz trajectory for nucleophilic attack at the π* orbital of the substrate imino group. Interestingly, the model additionally suggests that the Nδ atom of the formimino group would be oriented toward Mn2+B – perhaps implying that Mn2+A is not as important for transition state stabilization. This contrasts with the mechanistic proposal set forth for arginase, in which the Nη2 atom of L-arginine coordinates to Mn2+A as the tetrahedral intermediate is approached.49

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study clearly demonstrate that the metal-free T. cruzi protein with undetermined function annotated as “arginase superfamily protein” by the Structural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium20 (PDB entry 2A0M) is in fact a Mn2+-dependent formiminoglutamase capable of binding a binuclear manganese cluster comparable to that first observed in rat arginase I.15 Mechanistic inferences emanating from structure-function studies of TcFIGase are summarized in the mechanistic proposal presented in Figure 12, in which the side chains of N38, R144, S154, and E273 function in substrate binding. We propose that TcFIGase utilized a metal-activated hydroxide mechanism for the hydrolysis of the substrate formimino group, which proceeds through a neutral tetrahedral intermediate stabilized by metal coordination as well as hydrogen bonds with D142 and E273. Proton transfer from the hydroxyl group to the leaving amino group of the tetrahedral intermediate facilitates collapse of the tetrahedral intermediate and product dissociation. In general, an amine must be protonated in order to be a leaving group in the collapse of a tetrahedral intermediate. Since D142 is close to both the metal-bridging hydroxide ion and the α-amino group of formiminoglutamate in the model of the enzyme-substrate complex shown in Figure 11, it is possible that D142 mediates this proton transfer – this would ensure that L-glutamate and not ammonia is the leaving group in the collapse of the tetrahedral intermediate shown in Figure 12. There is no suitably-oriented proton donor group that could enable the departure of ammonia based on the model of the enzyme-substrate complex (Figure 11), e.g., as achieved by H269 in N-formimino-L-glutamate iminohydrolase; this enzyme adopts an unrelated fold and catalyzes the HutF reaction shown in Figure 1.45,51 The binding and ionization of additional solvent completes the catalytic cycle of TcFIGase. The synthesis and study of tetrahedral transition state analogues complexed with TcFIGase will allow us to test structural aspects of this mechanistic proposal, which we will report in due course.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Proposed catalytic mechanism for Mn2+2-TcFIGase.

Acknowledgments

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM49758.

We thank Dr. Ethan Merritt for supplying the TcFIGase plasmid, and we thank the National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory (beamline X29) for access to X-ray crystallographic data collection facilities. Additionally, we thank Dr. Kelley Bethony in the Science Department of the Episcopal Academy for helpful scientific discussions.

ABBREVIATIONS

TCEP

Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride

BME

β-mercaptoethanol

TcFIGase

Trypanosoma cruzi formiminoglutamase

EDTA

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

DPA

dipicolinic acid

LB

lysogeny broth

PDB

Protein Data Bank

r.m.s

root-mean-square

ICP-AES

inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry

Footnotes

Accession Codes

The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org) with accession codes 4MXR, 4MYN, 4MYL, 4MYF, and 4MYK, respectively.

References

  • 1.Caspi R, Altman T, Dreher K, Fulcher CA, Subhraveti P, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Mueller LA, Ong Q, Paley S, Pujar A, Shearer AG, Travers M, Weerasinghe D, Zhang P, Karp PD. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D742–D753. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bender DA. Amino Acid Metabolism. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. Histidine; pp. 305–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hedegaard J, Brevet J, Roche J. Imidazole lactic acid: an intermediate in L-histidine degradation in Escherichia coli B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1966;25:335–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Emes AV, Hassall H. Degradation of L-histidine in rat. The formation of imidazolylpyruvate, imidazolyllactate and imidazolylpropionate. Biochem J. 1973;136:649–658. doi: 10.1042/bj1360649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cortese R, Brevet J, Hedegaard J. Characterization of an imidazolepyruvic acid reducing system from Escherichia coli B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968;31:209–215. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90732-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tabor H, Mehler AH, Hayaishi O, White J. Urocanic acid as an intermediate in the enzymatic conversion of histidine to glutamic and formic acids. J Biol Chem. 1952;196:121–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mehler AH, Tabor H. Deamination of histidine to form urocanic acid in liver. J Biol Chem. 1953;201:775–784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miller A, Waelsch H. Formimino transfer from formamidinoglutaric acid to tetrahydrofolic acid. J Biol Chem. 1957;228:397–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bender RA. Regulation of the histidine utilization (hut) system in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76:565–584. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00014-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brown DD, Kies MW. The mammalian metabolism of L-histidine : I. The enzymatic formation of L-hydantoin-5-propionic acid. J Biol Chem. 1959;234:3182–3187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hassall H, Greenberg DM. Studies on the enzymic decomposition of urocanic acid: VI. Properties of the enzyme catalyzing the oxidation of 4(5)-imidazolone-5(4)-propionic acid to L-hydantoin-5-propionic acid. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125:278–285. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90662-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hassall H, Greenberg DM. The bacterial metabolism of L-hydantoin-5-propionic acid to carbamyl-glutamic acid and glutamic acid. J Biol Chem. 1963;238:3325–3329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ouzounis CA, Kyrpides NC. On the evolution of arginases and related enzymes. J Mol Evol. 1994;39:101–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00178255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perozich J, Hempel J, Morris SM., Jr Roles of conserved residues in the arginase family. Biochim Biophys Acta, Protein Struct Mol Enzymol. 1998;1382:23–37. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(97)00131-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kanyo ZF, Scolnick LR, Ash DE, Christianson DW. Structure of a unique binuclear manganese cluster in arginase. Nature. 1996;383:554–557. doi: 10.1038/383554a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Elkins JM, Clifton IJ, Hernandez H, Doan LX, Robinson CV, Schofield CJ, Hewitson KS. Oligomeric structure of proclavaminic acid amidino hydrolase: evolution of a hydrolytic enzyme in clavulanic acid biosynthesis. Biochem J. 2002;366:423–434. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahn HJ, Kim KH, Lee J, Ha JY, Lee HH, Kim D, Yoon HJ, Kwon AR, Suh SW. Crystal structure of agmatinase reveals structural conservation and inhibition mechanism of the ureohydrolase superfamily. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:50505–50513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409246200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee SJ, Kim DJ, Kim HS, Lee BI, Yoon HJ, Yoon JY, Kim KH, Jang JY, Im HN, An DR, Song JS, Kim HJ, Suh SW. Crystal structures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa guanidinobutyrase and guanidinopropionase, members of the ureohydrolase superfamily. J Struct Biol. 2011;175:329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dowling DP, Costanzo L, Gennadios HA, Christianson DW. Evolution of the arginase fold and functional diversity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:2039–2055. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-7554-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fan E, Baker D, Fields S, Gelb MH, Buckner FS, Van Voorhis WC, Phizicky E, Dumont M, Mehlin C, Grayhack E, Sullivan M, Verlinde C, DeTitta G, Meldrum DR, Merritt EA, Earnest T, Soltis M, Zucker F, Myler PJ, Schoenfield L, Kim D, Worthey L, LaCount D, Vignali M, Li J, Mondal S, Massey A, Carroll B, Gulde S, Luft J, DeSoto L, Holl M, Caruthers J, Bosch J, Robien M, Arakaki T, Holmes M, Le Trong I, Hol WGJ. Structural genomics of pathogenic protozoa: an overview. In: Kobe B, Guss M, Huber T, editors. Methods in Molecular Biology, volume 426: Structural Proteomics: High-Throughput Methods. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2008. pp. 497–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lund P, Magasanik B. N-formimino-L-glutamate formiminohydrolase of Aerobacter aerogenes. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:4316–4319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaminskas E, Kimhi Y, Magasanik B. Urocanase and N-formimino-L-glutamate formiminohydrolase of Bacillus subtilis, two enzymes of the histidine degradation pathway. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:3536–3544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Otwinowski Z, Mino W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung L-W, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D66. 2010:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr D61. 2005:458–464. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905001617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. 1994;D50:760–763. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994003112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr. 1993;26:283– 291. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983;22:2577–2637. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Archibald RM. Colorimetric determination of urea. J Biol Chem. 1945;157:507–518. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cama E, Colleluori DM, Emig FA, Shin H, Kim SW, Kim NN, Traish AM, Ash DE, Christianson DW. Human arginase II: crystal structure and physiological role in male and female sexual arousal. Biochemistry. 2003;42:8445–8451. doi: 10.1021/bi034340j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Di Costanzo L, Sabio G, Mora A, Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC, Centeno F, Christianson DW. Crystal structure of human arginase I at 1.29-Å resolution and exploration of inhibition in the immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13058–13063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504027102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dowling DP, Ilies M, Olszewski KL, Portugal S, Mota MM, Llinás M, Christianson DW. Crystal structure of arginase from Plasmodium falciparum and implications for L-arginine depletion in malarial infection. Biochemistry. 2010;49:5600–5608. doi: 10.1021/bi100390z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.D’Antonio EL, Ullman B, Roberts SC, Dixit UG, Wilson ME, Hai Y, Christianson DW. Crystal structure of arginase from Leishmania mexicana and implications for the inhibition of polyamine biosynthesis in parasitic infections. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;535:163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol. 2007;372:774–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Delano WD. MacPyMol: A PyMol-based molecular graphics application for MacOS X. DeLano Scientific LLC; Palo Alto, California: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.D’Antonio EL, Christianson DW. Crystal structures of complexes with cobalt-reconstituted human arginase I. Biochemistry. 2011;50:8018–8027. doi: 10.1021/bi201101t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scolnick LR, Kanyo ZF, Cavalli RC, Ash DE, Christianson DW. Altering the binuclear manganese cluster of arginase diminishes thermostability and catalytic function. Biochemistry. 1997;36:10558–10565. doi: 10.1021/bi970800v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cama E, Emig FA, Ash DE, Christianson DW. Structural and functional importance of first-shell metal ligands in the binuclear manganese cluster of arginase I. Biochemistry. 2003;42:7748–7758. doi: 10.1021/bi030074y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Di Costanzo L, Pique ME, Christianson DW. Crystal structure of human arginase I complexed with thiosemicarbazide reveals an unusual thiocarbonyl μ-sulfide ligand in the binuclear manganese cluster. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:6388–6389. doi: 10.1021/ja071567j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bewley MC, Jeffrey PD, Patchett ML, Kanyo ZF, Baker EN. Crystal structures of Bacillus caldovelox arginase in complex with substrate and inhibitors reveal new insights into activation, inhibition and catalysis in the arginase superfamily. Structure. 1999;7:435–448. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Petřek M, Košinová P, Koča J, Otyepka M. MOLE: a Voronoi diagram-based explorer of molecular channels, pores, and tunnels. Structure. 2007;15:1357–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schmidt B, Ho L, Hogg PJ. Allosteric disulfide bonds. Biochemistry. 2006;45:7429–7433. doi: 10.1021/bi0603064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martí-Arbona R, Xu C, Steele S, Weeks A, Kuty GF, Seibert CM, Raushel FM. Annotating enzymes of unknown function: N-formimino-L-glutamate deiminase is a member of the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2006;45:1997–2005. doi: 10.1021/bi0525425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cavalli RC, Burke CJ, Soprano DR, Kawamoto S, Ash DE. Mutagenesis of rat liver arginase expressed in Escherichia coli: role of conserved histidines. Biochemistry. 1994;33:10652–10657. doi: 10.1021/bi00201a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reczkowski RS, Ash DE. EPR evidence for binuclear manganese(II) centers in rat liver arginase. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:10992–10994. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lombardi PM, Cole KE, Dowling DP, Christianson DW. Structure, mechanism, and inhibition of histone deacetylases and related metalloenzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21:735–743. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Christianson DW. Arginase: structure, mechanism, and physiological role in male and female sexual arousal. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38:191–201. doi: 10.1021/ar040183k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cox JD, Kim NN, Traish AM, Christianson DW. Arginase-boronic acid complex highlights a physiological role in erectile function. Nat Struct Biol. 1999;6:1043–1047. doi: 10.1038/14929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martí-Arbona R, Raushel FM. Mechanistic characterization of N-formimino-L-glutamate iminohydrolase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry. 2006;45:14256–14262. doi: 10.1021/bi061673i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Troshin PV, Procter JB, Barton GJ. Java bioinformatics analysis web services for multiple sequence alignment—JABAWS:MSA. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2001–2002. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES