Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e84377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084377

Early Life History of Alatina cf. moseri Populations from Australia and Hawaii with Implications for Taxonomy (Cubozoa: Carybdeida, Alatinidae)

Teresa Carrette 1,*, Ilka Straehler-Pohl 2, Jamie Seymour 3
Editor: Patrick O'Grady4
PMCID: PMC3893091  PMID: 24454725

Abstract

The early life stages of the cubomedusa Alatina cf. moseri from Osprey Reef (North Queensland, Australia) and Waikiki (Oahu, Hawaii) were studied using laboratory-based culturing conditions. Spawning populations from both regions were observed with reliable periodicity allowing polyp cultures from these locations to be collected and established under laboratory conditions. The polyps of this species were successfully reared from spawning adults. Polyps of Alatina cf. moseri were cultured at temperatures of 23–28°C, developed up to 19 tentacles and reached up to 1.70 mm in height. The balloon-shaped hypostomes possessed 4 well-defined lips. The polyps increased their numbers by means of formation of either sedentary polyp buds or creeping-polyp buds, which attached after 2–3 days. Metamorphosis occurred at temperatures of 25–28°C. Development of polyps and medusae were achieved for the first time within the genus Alatina and allowed comparisons of early life history between these and other species of the Carybdeida families. The metamorphosis and young medusa of this genus showed characters that differed distinctly from those noted for other Carybdeida species, but are very similar to the one described from Puerto Rico by Arneson and Cutress in 1976 for Alatina sp. (named by them Carybdea alata). Based on this evidence, the discrepancies in original specimen descriptions and the previous genetic comparisons, we support the suggestion that the two previously described species of Alatina from Australia and Hawaii (Alatina mordens and Alatina moseri) appear to represent artificial taxonomic units and may in fact be the same as the original Carybdea alata species named from Puerto Rico. Further taxonomic studies are desperately needed in order to clarify the various species and description discrepancies that exist within this newly proposed genus.

Introduction

The early life history has not yet been described for Carybdeida species belonging to the newly formed genus Alatina [1] In fact, life cycle knowledge is missing for the majority of the cubozoan species [2] only a small number having descriptions of the early stages of the life cycle [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Only one complete life cycle, from spawning medusa through sessile stages to spawning medusa, has been published to date for the Caribbean cubozoan Tripedalia cystophora Conant, 1897 [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].

Mass spawning of corals and their link to the lunar cycle is a well-known phenomenon across various parts of the globe [24], [25] but very few such lunar based spawning events have been reported in other cnidarians [2]. The lunar linked periodicity of Alatina moseri (Mayer, 1906) (previously Charybdea moseri Mayer, 1906 or Carybdea alata Reynaud, 1830) in Hawaii has been documented since the late 1980's with their predictable arrival on Waikiki beach being reported as the 8th to 10th days after every full moon [2], [26], [27], [28], aggregations of sexually mature Alatina were observed from this site by the first and third author on consecutive monthly cycles from Waikiki Beach in Hawaii on various occasions over the last 10 years leading to the hypothesis of a spawning population. A similar observation of sexually mature medusae with regular lunar periodicity (also 8 to 10 days after a full moon) was noted from Alatina populations from 1999 onwards at Osprey Reef, which allowed for reliable collections to be made from both these sites.

The order Carybdeida is under revision and the subject of some debate, however, there are currently five accepted families within this group, which are Alatinidae [1], Carukiidae [29], Carybdeidae[30] , Tamoyidae [31] and Tripedaliidae [32]. Within the Alatinidae family there are several species that are under revision and debate continues as to the validity of the different Alatina species [33] in particular and how these relate to the original description of Carybdea alata that was described by Reynaud [34] for a species from the Atlantic Ocean.

Species Identification

The population of Alatina sp. used in this study, collected from Osprey Reef, is similar in morphology to the described alatinid Alatina mordens also reported from the Great Barrier Reef region [1], however, the specimens reported here have 6 eyes per rhopalium (not 2 or 4) and their statoliths are a distinctly light amber colour and jellybean in shape (as opposed to deep garnet reddish and tear drop shaped). This suggests that either these specimens are a different species to those described as Alatina mordens by Gershwin [1] or that the original description of Alatina mordens is inaccurate regarding this character. As specimens of Alatina mordens used for genetic comparative analysis by Bentlage et al. [29], [33] were provided by the first and third authors from this same collection trip, this discrepancy in identification may simply be from the original description [1]. Additionally, the original description of Alatina moseri [1] was made purely from preserved specimens and discrepancies in described features also exist when compared to specimens collected for this study. The predominant difference and a feature used to distinguish Alatina moseri is the presence of only 4 eyes in total [1], where as the specimens collected for these studies have 6 eyes per rhopalial niche. As type specimens of Alatina moseri do not match those used for this study, it again suggests that either these are a different species or that the original description is inaccurate as was solely based on preserved specimens and preservation can alter the appearance of certain features. Adult medusa from both collection sites most closely resembles the former species Carybdea alata and show identical morphological key taxonomic characteristics to each other. As A. moseri is the earliest named species of the two, for this paper we will refer to the animals in this study as Alatina cf. moseri.

Early developmental stages have been recently identified as important taxonomic indicators for both scyphozoans and cubozoans [13], [14], [16], [35], [36], [37] and could help shed light on the current species, family, order and even class debate. This study details the early life history of Australian and Hawaiian populations of Alatina cf. moseri comprehensively for the first time and compares to the description of Carybdea alata development from Puerto Rico [8] to see if there are developmental basis for species segregation. Additionally, these developmental observations will be compared to the current databases of cubozoan polyp life histories described and serve as a resource for ongoing research into cubozoan polyp ecology.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

No specific permissions were required for either of these locations as they were not taken from private or protected areas and cnidarians do not require permits for collection. Additionally, this species is not listed as protected or endangered.

Collection of animals

Specimens from Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii

Specimens of Alatina cf. moseri (Plate S1, Fig. A) were collected from the shore at Waikiki, Hawaii (21°16′12.90″N, 157°49′24.22″W) between 2300 h and 0400 h on the 22nd of October 2000, 10 days after the full moon. Individual animals that washed up onto the sand were collected by hand and placed individually into plastic click-seal bags with seawater. Over 80 individuals with milky white gonads and deemed to be in spawning condition (making the normally transparent bells cloudy) were retrieved.

Specimens from Osprey Reef, Northern Queensland, Australia

Large aggregations of the alatinid Alatina cf. moseri (Plate S1, Fig. B) had been noted regularly 8–10 days after the full moon at a site at Osprey Reef, North Queensland (13°52′55.17″S, 146°32′56.74″E) on a semi regular basis since 1999. Additionally at neighbouring reefs, mature individuals have been sighted with this same lunar periodicity. These additional sites include Raine Island in 2002 (11°35′30.19″S, 144°02′13.56″E), Holmes Reef in 2002 (16°27′13.68″S, 148°00′21.39″E), Miln Reef in 2004 (16°46′53.21″S, 146°15′53.81″E), Norman Reef in 2003 (16°25′36.51″S, 145°59′39.59″E), Agincourt Reef in 2003 (16°01′06.55″S, 145°51′01.40″E) and Steve's Bombie in 2007 (15°29′55.18″S, 145°48′05.90″E). Osprey Reef had been the site of five successful collection trips of mature Alatina cf. moseri individuals from 2000–2006 numbering between 30 to 300 animals per trip. This synchronicity allowed for predictable collection of mature specimens.

On November 15th, 2006, 10 days after full moon, specimens of Alatina cf. moseri were collected between 0000 h and 0230 h at Osprey Reef. To attract medusae for collection, high power underwater lights were set up off the diving platform of a research dive vessel anchored at the reef's edge. Collection of over 250 individual animals occurred, they were taken out of the water with dip nets and transferred into large collection bins filled with fresh seawater. Visual inspections of animals revealed approximately 60 percent of individuals were in spawning condition with milky white gonads evident.

Fertilization

Alatina cf. moseri from Hawaii

The sexes of individual medusae were determined by light microscopy observation. For fertilization, approximately 0.5 mL of egg solution was extracted from each spawning female with a glass pipette and transferred into individual Petri dishes filled with clean, seawater. A collection of the water in which spawning males were kept was made, and from this “sperm mixture” a single drop was added to each of the egg solution dishes. Regular observations of cultures were made using a dissecting microscope with additional photographic documentation.

Alatina cf. moseri from Australia

Due to the mass storage of specimens in large buckets at the time of collection, individual fertilization of eggs was not required as the individuals spawned directly into the bucket. Multiple 650 mL plastic containers were filled with clean seawater and in each container approximately 1 mL of gamete mixture was added. The plastic containers were closed with lids and stored in a darkened room for transportation back to land. When back on land, observed planulae in these plastic containers were extracted and placed in new 650 ml containers with filtered seawater. Detailed observations concerning polyp formation were also documented via observations with a dissecting microscope and recorded with still images.

Polyp cultures

The polyps of both A. cf. moseri populations were primarily cultured in the plastic containers and Petri dishes in which the planulae had settled. Additionally to the plastic containers, cultures of Alatina cf. moseri from Osprey Reef initially and later on cultures from Waikiki Beach were also cultured inside 30-L-BiOrb Fish Tanks® with filter systems. These were filled with fresh seawater and the whole content of plastic containers was suspended in the water column.

Cultures of both populations were held in a constant temperature aquarium room (24–26°C). Observations were made regularly over the following 18 months.

The polyps of both populations were fed with Artemia nauplii every second to third day from day 11 post fertilization onwards. Complete water changes of all the plastic containers occurred two hours post feed, with the large BiOrb® containers receiving half water changes every 3 to 6 months due to the filter systems.

In July 2007, 10 polyps from each of the Alatina cultures and 4 litres of original culture water for the adaptation period were transferred to the laboratory in the Zoological Institute in Hamburg, (Germany) to be continuously cultured by the second author for further detailed observations.

These polyps were kept at 25°C and fed two times a week with Artemia sp. nauplii. A complete water change with natural, filtered seawater followed about half an hour after feeding.

As the water contents and salinity might have differed from the sea water used in Hamburg, the polyps were first cultured in “Queensland water” which was diluted over the following three weeks with natural North Sea water for adaption. Detailed observations concerning polyp, metamorphosis and young medusa morphology and development were documented by photographs and measured as described by [14] [36].

For cultures in both countries, salinity levels were also kept at a constant range of 33–36 psu.

Abbreviations: MDD: mouth disc diameter; TBL: total body length; UD: umbrella diameter; UH: umbrella height

Results

Fertilization and polyp formation (Table S1)

Thorough observations of these two populations of polyps showed no difference between timelines of developmental stages or morphological features. As such all the data on development and anatomy have been combined from here on with any discrepancies noted.

For both populations the planulae were observed from 24 h to 48 h post gamete mixing in Petri dishes and at this stage showed the presence of “eye spots”. The planulae were then extracted and placed in clean plastic containers with seawater.

72 h post fertilization the planulae were observed on the bottom of the Petri dishes and had attained irregular shapes. Although predominantly round, 2 to 4 tentacle buds protruded from their circumference containing 2–4 small eurytele nematocysts in their tips. The tentacle buds continued to grow over the next 24 h.

On day 5, primary polyps were visible at the bottom of the container and moving in a creeping way. They had cone shaped bodies and 2–4 tentacles that were longer than the body length. They creep with one of the tentacles stretched out on the substrate like an antenna.

On day 6, approximately 50% of the primary polyps settled down on the bottom of the plastic containers and hypostomes were evident (Plate S1, Fig. D). At this stage, four 30-L-BiOrb® aquaria were filled with clean, filtered seawater and the plastic containers, with the settled polyps attached, were suspended in each of these BiOrbs®.

From day 10–13 a distinct shift in the morphology of the primary polyps was noted: they appeared to flatten against the substrate while their four tentacles were stretched out to the sides. The tentacles elongated and the euryteles in the tentacle tips were replaced by single stenoteles. At this stage polyps were fed for the first time on either finely sliced crayfish meat, ground up egg yolk, or the more successful diet of 1-day old Artemia nauplii (Plate S1, Fig. F). A feeding rate of approximately 30% of the individuals was noted on day 11. The polyp density was approximately 1 per 5 cm2. Polyps were subsequently fed with Artemia nauplii every second day.

From day 18 onwards, polyps increased in size and by day 21 approximately 40% of the polyps had developed six (Plate S1, Fig. E) or eight tentacles. These polyps with increased tentacle number started asexual reproduction (approximately 20% of polyps with buds at their calyx base, Plate S1, Fig. J). Asexual reproduction continued with polyps having as many as five buds at any time. These buds appeared to be in one of two forms and would either remain next to the base of the original ‘parent’ polyp after detachment, or undergo a creeping phase and relocate to another position. The creeping polyps from budding (Plate S1, Fig. K) did neither resemble the parent polyp nor the primary polyps during creeping phase (see creeping polyp description below).

Feeding regimes continued and asexual reproduction was apparent throughout the culture with exponential numbers of creeping polyps apparent over the sides of the Bio-Orb® tanks.

On day 29–31 the first signs of metamorphosis were apparent in all cultures with an observed change in polyp shape, a darkening of the polyp pigment and migration of the tentacles into four distinct clusters. At this time the hypostome of the polyp lengthened, as did the stalk. Continual and daily metamorphosis of polyps was observed and is noted in detail below.

PLATE S1 Medusae, polyps and asexual reproduction in Alatina cf. moseri. A: adult medusa, bell height ca. 100 mm – tentacles removed; B: adult medusa in the open water column (Australia); C: newly detached medusa; D: primary polyps (only few µm in height, no scale, picture was taken by camera through 400× microscope objective); E: young polyp (<20 days post fertilization); F: young polyp feeding on Artemia naupli; G: fully developed polyp (>21 days post fertilization), lateral view; H: fully developed polyp, oral view – note lips; I: hypostome, note lips (hypostome ca. 0.5 mm in length); J: budding polyp; K: creeping polyp (from bud); L: cyst, stage right after encystment, note the still visible mouth opening (MO); M: cyst, stage after a week, note the unstructured tissue inside the mucus shell.

Polyp anatomy

The polyps of the two observed Alatina cf. moseri populations showed no distinct differences.

Polyps both populations were solitary (Plate S1, Fig. G). The bodies were divided into three parts, the hypostome, the calyx and a stalk region including a basal disc and a tiny periderm beaker enveloping the pedal region.

The polyps of both populations had a total body length ( = TBL) of up to 1.70 mm (TBL: 1.46–1.70, mean: 1.58 mm). The polyps of the Hawaiian population were only slightly larger with a total body length ( = TBL) of up to 1.70 mm (TBL: range: 1.46–1.70 mm) with a mean value of 1.58 mm (n = 25)) than the observed polyps of the Australian population (TBL: 1.43–1.63 mm, mean mm: 1.52 (n = 25)). The hypostome region included a single circlet of up to 19 tentacles (11–19, mean: 16, n = 25) in the Australian population. The tentacle numbers in the Hawaiian population ranged between 12–18 with a similar average of 16.The tentacles in both populations were solid, translucent, and bore a single stenotele in the knob-like tip. The calyces of both populations were shaped like a bottle, creamy-white with a tinge of orange when recently fed and about 60% of the TBL. A belt of nematocysts, mainly stenoteles and ovoid heterotrichous microbasic euryteles, was clearly visible around the lower calyx. The mouth disc diameter in both populations (MDD: Australian: 0.41–0.46, mean: 0.43; Hawaiian: 0.43–0.50; 0.48) was the widest body diameter and about 0.3fold of the calyx length.

The hypostome of polyps of both populations was four-lipped (Plate S1, Figs. H, I), balloon-shaped and approximately 14–15% of the TBL. It was not completely contractible into the body. The stalk, which was only slightly set off from the bottle shaped calyx, was short and colourless translucent.

Observations on feeding behaviour noted that the polyps of both populations showed a muscular ring at the level of the tentacular circlet which seemed to function as a water gate by constricting the calyx underneath the peristome until the opening to the gastrovascular cavity underneath the hypostome lumen was completely shut. In this way, the captured prey was placed into the hypostome and remained held there until the outer mouth opening was completely closed. After the opening had completely shut, this muscle ring relaxed and the opening to the stomach widened so that the prey could be transferred into the main gastric cavity.

Asexual reproduction

Creeping polyps

There were no observed differences in the creeping polyps of either populations. Asexual proliferation in both populations occurred by lateral budding of polyps (origin: junction point of calyx and stalk, nematocyst developing zone), typically one to five buds per polyp at a time, depending on the feeding conditions. The creeping polyps showed 4 to 8 very short, still filiform tentacles around a cone-shaped hypostome and a high number of large stenotele nematocysts at the rear end of the body. Single stenoteles were located at the bases of the tentacles that migrated to the tentacle tips as soon as the polyps settled. The morphology of the creeping polyps differed a lot from the primary polyps by having a distinctly larger body size (TBL up to 2 mm) and by the “head region” which resembled a “daisy flower” resulting from the very short, nematocyst-lacking tentacles surrounding the mouth cone. These creeping polyps glided oral pole first, and, in contrary to the primary polyps, on their body midst with raised “head region” for 2 to 3 days over the substrate before they settled. After settlement they grew to a 9 to 12-tentacle stage before start budding themselves.

Cysts

During extremely adverse conditions (drastic changes in temperature or salinity or absence of food for prolonged periods) the polyps of both populations encysted. To induce this cyst form, temperatures were lowered from 25°C to 19°C or salinity was increased to 42 psu or feeding was ceased for a period of four to five weeks. In this state polyps retracted their tentacles completely into their calyx and contracted the whole body into a ball-shape (Plate S1, Fig. L). The different parts of the body like tentacle tips, mouth opening and calyx fused into an indistinguishable white tissue ball, enclosed by a transparent and flexible mucus coat (Plate S1, Fig. M). The cysts of both populations stayed attached to the substrate. These survived for up to 3 months in these cyst forms during starvation events and both polyp populations subsequently regenerated within 3 days after feeding restart.

There were no obvious differences in the morphology of the endurance stages of populations from Australia or Hawaii, however, the longer conditions stayed unfavourable the more polyps died inside the cysts. The longest observed cyst state was by the Australian culture and this was for a twelve-month period before recovery was commenced.

PLATE S2 Metamorphosis in Alatina cf. moseri A: fully developed polyp; B: Stage 1: elongation of hypostome, calyx and stalk, tentacles cluster at four spots; C lateral view of stage 1 with tentacles being absorbed, D oral view close up of same animal as C: Stage 2: clustered tentacles fuse at base, note the red-violet pigmentation around hypostome and eye spots at the fused tentacles bases (D); E: Stage 3: medusa tentacles appear in space between rhopalia, F (same animal as E): note that this stage is still feeding on Artemia nauplii; G: Stage 4: nematocyst clusters appear on the developing exumbrella; H: Stage 5: after reabsorption of the remaining stalk tissue, the newly detached medusa free swimming.

Metamorphosis (Plate S2)

Metamorphosis in Alatina cf. moseri polyps cultured in Germany, occurred only between the months of November and March, with and without temperature change. The difference with temperature change was that more polyps metamorphosed with raised temperature. The metamorphosis in Australian cultures occurred spontaneously since their original collection, however, not in the same mass numbers as was initially observed six weeks after initial fertilization took place. Both populations showed a complete metamorphosis of approximately 14 days from start of metamorphosis to medusa detachment. There were no morphological or time differences noted when comparing both populations. The stages of metamorphosis were documented photographically and described in detail (both populations combined) below:

Phase 1 (Plate S2, Fig. B): Elongation of calyx, stalk and especially hypostome, the hypostome in some cases being as long as the calyx and in all cases baseball bat-shaped. The tentacles formed clusters at 4 points around the peristome. Reddish violet pigmentation appeared at 4 spots between the tentacle at the base of the hypostome.

Phase 2 (Plate S2, Figs. C,D): The clustered tentacles fused at the bases, distal tentacle ends were reabsorbed and rhopalia developed at the fused tentacles bases. Statolith formation occurred initially while the tentacles were still reabsorbed. A horizontal ring groove appeared at the oral end of the calyx, dividing the transforming calyx into two parts: the upper part with already transformed medusoid tissue (plate-like cells) marked by reddish dark brown colour and the lower part with the not-yet transformed, unpigmented polypoid tissue (cylindrical cells) marked by white/pinkish colour (Plate S2, Fig. C). The reddish violet pigmentation sprat edgeways until a red-violet coloured pigment ring (Plate S2, Fig. D) was formed around the hypostome base.

Phase 3 (Plate S2, Figs. E, F): Between the rhopalia, 4 medusa tentacle buds appeared. A deep cleft around the hypostome marked the transformation of the polypoid hypostome into a medusoid manubrium. Single gastric filaments emerged in the interradii at the inner base of the manubrium. The red-violet pigmented region transformed into a velarium. The horizontal ring groove moved down towards the calyx base due to transformation of the remaining calyx tissue into medusoid tissue. Until this stage, the metamorphosing polyps were still catching and consuming prey (Plate S2, Fig. F).

Phase 4 (Plate S2, Fig. G): The medusoid tentacle buds grew out to very short, hollow and moniliform tentacles with four thick, yellowish brown coloured rolls of nematocyst batteries. The transformed calyx grew further in size, forming a slightly transparent umbrella and changing again colours from reddish dark brown to yellowish light brown. Small nematocyst clusters appeared, densely covering the developing exumbrella. The remaining stalk was reabsorbed.

Phase 5 (Plate S2, Fig. H): Pulsing of the medusae was initiated at least 48 h prior to detachment. At this stage no feeding behaviour in any of the newly metamorphosed polyps was observed. The medusa detached from the substrate while still a little remnant of the basal disc was visible at the apex of the umbrella. The basal disc was reabsorbed a few hours after detachment.

Young medusa (Plate S2, Fig. H)

There were absolutely no differences found between the young medusae of these two populations. Newly detached medusae of both populations had tetraradial symmetry. The umbrella was spheroidally-pyramidal (Hawaiian and Australian population: umbrella height ( = UH): 1.2–1.6 mm, mean: 1.35 mm, umbrella diameter ( = UD): 1.1–1.5 mm, mean: 1.24 mm).

The bell warts of the medusae were small (0.06 mm in diameter), innumerable, round and densely covering the whole exumbrella and contained microbasic euryteles and spherical holotrichous isorhizas.

The manubria of the young medusae were short (0.24–0.3 mm, mean: 0.27; ≈20% of UH) and four-lipped. One gastric filament per quadrant was visible through the apex of the umbrella.

The medusae had 4 medusa tentacles that were much shorter than the length of the umbrella (approx. 16% of umbrella height). No additional medusa tentacles developed after detachment. Extended tentacles resembled short pearl strings because of the up to 4 thick, round, yellowish brown nematocyst batteries containing only ovoid heterotrichous microbasic euryteles. The young medusae were yellowish brown to yellowish olive in colour. Feeding of young medusae proved challenging with Artemia naupilli seeming insufficient to sustain them. The longest time span medusae (n = 6) were kept alive was for 29 days and were fed small pieces of raw Acetes australis three times a day. At their time of death, medusae ranged in size from 15 mm to 25 mm.

Discussion

Several observations on the early life history of Carybdeida species have now been reported, however this is the first comprehensive description of the early life stages of two populations of the newly established genus Alatina [1].

Fertilization & Polyp formation (Table S1)

Spawning aggregations have been previously reported in several species of Cubozoa [3], [4], [6], [7], [9], [12], [16], [17], [32], [38], [39], however, the investigations on Alatina sp. ( = Carybdea alata from Puerto Rico Arneson & Cutress [7], [8]), Carybdea xaymacana Conant, 1897 [32], [40], [41] , Carybdea sp. ( = Carybdea marsupialis from Puerto Rico, [94],[6] , Carybdea rastoni Haacke, 1887 [42] [5], Copula sivickisi (Stiasny, 1926) [43] [10], [12], [15] and Tripedalia cystophora Conant, 1897 [17], [20], [32], [41] have all shown internal fertilization occurs except in Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye, 1910) where the gametes were released into the open water [16].

While it is unclear if internal fertilization was occurring in the observed populations of Alatina cf. moseri as was reported for Caribbean population of Alatina [7] there were obvious mass spawning events occurring for both these populations with eggs and sperm being released at time of collection.

The time spans of embryonic development stages are similar in most cubozoan species compared in Table S1. Fertilised eggs developed into blastulae within 24 h post fertilization (p.f.) which transformed into “eye spot” bearing planulae within 1–2 days p.f. and then settled approximately 2–3 days p.f. The only exceptions to this are the development of Copula sivickisi and Morbakka virulenta. In C. sivickisi the developmental time in the different stages were extended by up to 150% compared to the other described cubozoan species. This might be due to the unique reproductive strategy in this species where they produce an embryo strand and the embryos are not released from it until they have reached the planula stage [10], [12], [15]. In Morbakka virulenta the embryonic development was postponed for 21 days after reaching the blastula stage by forming a cyst as resting stage [16]. After the resting period the blastula transformed into an “eye spot”-lacking planula which stayed inside the egg shell until a 1-tentacled primary polyp hatched directly from the egg, using the shell as substrate [16].

In the original life cycle description of Alatina sp. (Carybdea alata from Puerto Rico) the settlement of the planulae was completed after 5–6 days p.f. [7] which is about twice as long as in our cultures of Alatina cf. moseri. Likewise, for the subsequent developmental rates, the stages were approximately one third slower in the Alatina sp. description compared to the developmental shown in our Alatina cf. moseri cultures. We suggest that the differences might be caused by the different culturing conditions, such as a lower rearing temperature, and not necessarily that these are different species as temperature and food supply can lead to differences in developmental rates [10],[44]. The planulae of Alatina cf. moseri settled on the bottom of PET-containers while the planulae of Alatina sp.settled on clean glass [7]. PET-substrate was used as this has previously been suggested as being the artificial substrate of choice for settlement of scyphozoan planulae [45], [46], [47].

Polyps (Plate S1)

When comparing the polyps of both populations neither the measured sizes nor the morphology showed any significant difference. The general polyp morphology of the observed species conforms with that of other known cubopolyps in having (1) a bottle-shaped body with a clear structure and an aseptate gastric cavity, (2) solid, capitate tentacles with a stenotele nematocyst in their tips, and (3) a distinct stalk with a basal region covered by a thin periderm cuticle. The number of tentacles on polyps has been shown to differ between species [4], [6], [19], [48]. Polyps of Alatina sp. [7], [8] from Puerto Rico seem to be similar in structure and number with the polyps of Alatina cf. moseri when comparing the photos and descriptions and it is of note that the mean number of tentacles was identical. The polyps of Carybdea sp. (formerly described as Carybdea marsupialis by [4]), Chironex fleckeri [3]and Carybdea morandinii [14] do also show this general morphology in polyp tentacle structure [4], [6], [9], [48], [49]. The main exceptions to this polyp organisation are the polyps of Tripedalia cystophora, which have a bag-shaped body, fewer tentacles, and 20–40 heterotrichous euryteles in their tips instead of stenoteles [18], [19], [21], [22], [23], [35], [50], [51], [52], [53] and the polyps of Morbakka virulenta which have a tulip-shaped body which resembles more a scyphopolyp, and up to 17 tentacles with up to 30 nematocysts of two types (tri-rhopaloids and small spherical p-rhopaloids) located in their tips [16]. Additionally the polyps of Carybdea morandinii host zooxanthellae in their bodies [14], which were not found in either of our Alatina cf. moseri populations.

Polyps of Alatina cf. moseri show a muscular ring at the level of the tentacular circlet that seems to function in a similar way to the diaphragm found in Carybdea morandinii [14], [35], [53] by constricting the calyx underneath the peristome until the opening to the stomach underneath the hypostome lumen is completely shut. Like in Carybdea morandinii the muscle ring divides the gastric cavity horizontally into an antechamber and a main chamber but the diaphragm structure, which was found in C. morandinii, was not detected in the Alatina cf. moseri. These features can be observed with light microscopy while polyps are feeding.

A distinguishing characteristic of the observed Alatina cf. moseri populations is the four lips detected in the balloon shaped hypostome which resembles the club-shaped, four-lipped hypostomes of the scyphistoma of the Rhizostomida species [35], [37], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59]. For Cubozoa this structure was previously unknown and was not noted in the Alatina sp. description by [7].

Asexual reproduction

Creeping polyps

The budding process and the outer appearance of the creeping polyps resemble the description for other Carybdeida species [4], [6], [7], [8], [14], [35], [48], [53], [60] except the creeping polyps of T. cystophora [17], [18], [19], [21], [22], [61] which are very different from other species and resemble more the primary polyp stage than the creeping polyps and are also similar to those described for the chirodropid species Chironex fleckeri [3], [62]. An exception is again found in Morbakka virulenta which produces two-tentacled buds which do not develop head first but in a lateral position and which do not creep after detachment but swim with oral pole first near the bottom or the water surface [16].This kind of swimming behaviour was not observed in the Alatina cf. moseri .

Cysts

Encystment of cubopolyps were not originally described for Alatina sp [7] but were noted in Tripedalia cystophora [21], Chironex fleckeri [3] and Carybdea morandinii [14] during drastic salinity or temperature changes in culture waters. Encysting polyps were briefly described by Hartwick [3] as “a state that is probably equivalent to encystment where the polyps are highly contracted and non-responsive (sensu Werner [21])”. This state was further affirmed with the cyst formation being described again in Tripedalia and also noted in Carybdea sp. and Carybdea morandinii [35], [53]. The cysts of the two Alatina cf. moseri populations stuck to the substrate, similar to Tripedalia, and did not float around as seen in Carybdea sp. but as with those two species, the Alatina cf. moseri lacked structures like the anchor strings found in Carybdea morandinii [14], [35], [53].

For Chironex fleckeri it was noted that encysted polyps could last for at least two weeks in this form and would re-emerge to again feed if the salinity levels were returned to the original level [3]. Additionally, Tripedalia and Carybdea sp. cysts can survive for short periods (up to 14 days) of unfavourable conditions while the anchored cysts of Carybdea morandinii can survive for periods of up to 3 months [14], [53] . If the conditions did not return to normal after this time, the cysts died and macerated within 2–3 days. In comparison, the observed polyp cysts of the Alatina cf. moseri cultures seemed to be highly resilient, as they endured high salinities and starvation conditions for more than 12 months. The regeneration of C. morandinii polyps took 7 days after 14 days of encystment and up to 3 weeks after 1.5 months [14], [53] while the culture of Australian Alatina cf. moseri polyps regenerated back to their healthy feeding polyp state within 7 to 9 days after an encystment period of 12 months.

Metamorphosis

Metamorphosis in both Alatina cf. moseri populations is complete and without any noted residuum (Metamorphosis Type 2 [13], [14], [35], [53]), as in other cubozoan life cycles [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [18], [19], [21], [22], [23], [48], [50], [52] .

The whole process is very similar to the other cubozoan species, except for the highly extended hypostome, the capability of still feeding until a late stage (Phase 3) of the metamorphosis and the conspicuous, red-violet pigmentation of the future velarium region. This pigmentation was not mentioned for the metamorphosis of Alatina sp from Puerto Rico [7], [8].

The metamorphosis of the Hawaian and Australian Alatina cf. moseri populations results in a single 4-tentacled juvenile medusa as in Alatina sp, Copula sivickisi, Carybdea sp. (from Puerto Rico), Tripedalia cystophora, Carybdea morandinii and Chironex fleckeri [3], [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [17], [18], [19], [21], [22], [23], [52], [53], [63].

A subsequent study on the same Australian population of Alatina (cited as A latina nr. mordens) has shown that while thermal and osmotic variations did not seem to vary the rate of metamorphosis in this species, the reduction of available food did [64].

Newly detached medusae

As in Alatina sp [7], [8] in the exumbrella of the young medusae of the two Alatina cf. moseri populations, clusters of microbasic euryteles and spherical holotrichous isorhizas are found. This distribution of nematocyst types observed by us differs from T. cystophora and C. marsupialis, two species in which nematocyst clusters on the exumbrella mainly comprise atrichous and holotrichous isorhizas [21], [48] while in nettle warts on the exumbrella of C. morandinii, ovoid heterotrichous microbasic euryteles are predominant and isorhizas are rare. In the annular nematocyst batteries of the tentacles of A cf. moseri only ovoid heterotrichous microbasic euryteles are found like in Alatina sp from Puerto Rico, Tripedalia cystophora and Carybdea sp. [21], [48] while in the tentacles of C. morandinii several categories of nematocysts (holotrichous isorhizas, atrichous isorhizas, and single ovoid heterotrichous microbasic euryteles) are apparent [14]. The morphology of the newly detached medusae of A. cf. moseri are very similar to the medusae of Alatina sp described by [8] from Puerto Rico and the medusa drawn and described by Mayer [65] as Charybdea aurifera from the Tortugas.

Notes on taxonomy

Early life history stages have recently been discussed as ancestral-relatedness-reflecting characters in Scyphozoa [35], [36], [37] and in Cubozoa [13], [14], [35] and also this study highlights that early life stages may be important indicators for taxonomical evaluations.

Not only does this study show that the early life stages from polyp to medusa of Alatina cf. moseri from both the Osprey Reef, Australia and Waikiki beach, Hawaii populations follow the identical developmental lines and show no significant differences in body sizes or morphology in both polyps and young and adult medusae. The morphological features of these populations are also remarkably similar to the stages described for the Alatina sp. (former Carybdea alata) from Puerto Rico, with noted variations potentially attributable to incomplete observations at that time. Additionally, it supports previous suggestions that within the Alatina genus there may be multiple species named which represent artificial taxonomic units [29], [33]. Previous DNA analysis has suggested that Alatina mordens and Alatina moseri to be the same species as there was no significant genetic divergences which corresponded to the geographical localities of these populations [29], [66]. Through observations of the sessile stage, development times, both adult and young medusa morphology as well as the structure of the cysts, this study supports the conclusion that the two populations of adult Alatina used in this study have displayed no evidence for species differentiation. The authors support further investigation into the other species comprising the newly formed genus Alatina in order to clarify the taxonomic issues that remain for this group.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Time spans for embryology and primary polyp development in Cubozoa.

(DOCX)

Plate S1

Medusae, polyps and asexual reproduction in two Alatina cf moseri populations (Hawaii, Australia).

(DOCX)

Plate S2

Metamorphosis in Alatina cf moseri (Australian population).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank PD Dr. G. Jarms (Hamburg, Germany) for kind advice and laboratory facilities as well as Dr. Angel Yanagihara from the University of Hawaii. We would also like to acknowledge the tireless collection efforts of Jaap Barendrect and the crew of the Undersea Explorer in Australia, with many thanks also to the Hawaiian Lifeguard Association, especially Landy Blair, Ralph Goto and Rob Miller. Additional acknowledgements go to the Queensland Emergency Medical Research Foundation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding Statement

The Lions Foundation of Australia provided a grant that partially supported this research. J.S. acknowledges the financial support of the Queensland Emergency Medical Research Foundation, Brisbane, Queensland. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Gershwin L (2005) Carybdea alata auct. and Manokia stiasnyi, reclassification to a new family with description of a new genus and two new species. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 51: 501–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Carrette TJ, Underwood AH, Seymour JE (2012) Irukandji syndrome: a widely misunderstood and poorly researched tropical marine envenoming. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 42: 214–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hartwick R (1991) Distributional ecology and behaviour of the early life stages of the box-jellyfish Chironex fleckeri . Hydrobiologia 216/217: 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Studebaker J (1972) Development of the Cubomedusae, Carybdea marsupialis [Masters Dissertation]. Mayaguez: University of Puerto Rico. 69 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Okada YK (1927) Note sur l'ontogenie de Carybdea rastonii Haacke. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de la Belgique 3: 241–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cutress CE, Studebaker JP (1973) Development of the Cubomedusae Carybdea marsupialis . Proceedings of the Association of Island Marine Laboratories of the Caribbean 9: 25. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arneson A (1976) Life history or Carybdea alata Reynaud, 1830 (Cubomedusae) [Masters Thesis]. Mayaguez: University of Puerto Rico. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arneson CA, Cutress CE (1976) Life history of Carybdea alata Reynaud, 1830 (Cubomedusae). In: Mackie GO, editor. Coelenterate ecology and behaviour. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamaguchi M, Hartwick R (1980) Early life history of the sea wasp, Chironex fleckeri (Class Cubozoa). In: Tardent R, Tardent R, editors. Elsevier/Development and Cellular BIology of Coelenterates: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press. pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hartwick R (1991) Observations on the anatomy, behaviour, reproduction and life cycle of the cubozoan Carybdea sivickisi . Hydrobiologia 216/217: 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stangl K, Salvini-Plawen L, Holstein TW (2002) Staging and induction of medusae metamorphosis in Carybdea marsupialis (Cnidaria, Cubozoa). Vie et Milieu 52: 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lewis C, Long TAF (2005) Courtship and reproduction in Carybdea sivickisi (Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Marine Biology 147: 477. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Straehler-Pohl I, Jarms G (2005) Life cycle of Carybdea marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) reveals metamorphosis to be a modified strobilation. Marine Biology 147: 1271. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Straehler-Pohl I, Jarms G (2011) Morphology and life cycle of Carybdea morandinii, sp. nov. (Cnidaria), a cubozoan with zooxanthellae and peculiar polyp anatomy. Zootaxa 2755: 36–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lewis C, Kubota S, Migotto AE, Collins AG (2008) Sexually dimorphic cubomedusa Carybdea sivickisi (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) in Seto, Wakayama, Japan. Publications of the Marine Biological Laboratory in Seto, Japan 40: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Toshino S, Miyake H, Otsuka S, Okuizumi K, Adachi A, et al. (2012) Development and polyp formation of the giant box jellyfish Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye, 1910) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) collected from the Seto Inland Sea, Western Japan. Plankton and Benthos Research 8: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Werner B (1976) Killermedusen und ihr Liebesspiel. Umschau 76: 80–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Werner B (1973) New investigations on systematics and evolution of hte class Scyphozoa and the phylum Cnidaria. Publications of the Marine Biological Laboratory 20: 35–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Werner B, Cutress C, Studebaker J (1971) Life cycle of Tripedalia cystophora Conant (Cubomedusae). Nature 232: 582–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Werner B (1973) Spermatozeugmen und Paarungsverhalten bei Tripedalia cystopohra (Cubomedusae). Marine Biology 18: 212–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Werner B (1975) Bau und Lebensgeschichte des Polypen von Tripedalia cystohpora (Cubozoa, class. nov., Carybdeidae) und seine Bedeutund fur die Evolution der Cnidaria. Helgorlander wiss Meeresunters 27: 461–504. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Werner B (1983) Die Metamorphose des Polypen von Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) in die Meduse. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 36: 257–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Laska-Mehnert G (1985) Cytologische Veranderungen wahrend der metamorphoses des cubopolypen Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) in die medusae. Helgorlander Meeresuntersuchungen 39: 129–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Edwards A (2010) Reef rehabilitation manual. Coral Reef Targeted Research & Capacity Building for Management Program ii: 166. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Omori M (2011) Degradation and restoration of coral reefs: Experience in Okinawa, Japan. Marine Biology Research 7: 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Thomas CS, Scott SS, Galanis DJ, Goto RS (2001) Box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) in Waikiki - The analgesic effect of Sting-Aid, Adolph's meat tenderizer and fresh water on their stings: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hawaii Medical Journal 60: 205–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Thomas CS, Scott SA, Galanis DJ, Goto RS (2001) Box jellyfish (Carybdea alata) in Waikiki: Their influx cycle plus the analgesic effect of hot and cold packs on their stings to swimmers at the beach: A randomizes, placbo-controlled, clinical trial. Hawaii Medical Journal 60: 100–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yoshimoto CM, Yanagihara AA (2002) Cnidarian (coelenterate) envenomations in Hawaii improve following heat application. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygeine 96: 300–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bentlage B, Cartwright P, Yanagihara AA, Lewis C, Richards GS, et al. (2009) Evolution of box jellyfish (Cnidaria: Cubozoa), a group of highly toxic invertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society 277: 493–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lesson R-P (1843) Acalephes. 596 p.
  • 31. Haeckel E (1880) System der Acraspeden. Zweite Halfte des Systems der Medusen. Denkschriften der Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft zu Jena 2: 361–672. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Conant FS (1897) Notes on the Cubomedusae. John Hopkins University Circulars 132. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bentlage B, Lewis C (2012) An illustrated key and synopsis of the families and genera of carybdeid box jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida), with emphasis on the “Irukandji family” (Carukiidae). Journal of Natural History 46: 2595–2620. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reynaud AAM (1830) La Carybdee (Meduse) ailee Carybdea alata n. sp.; Lesson RP, editor. Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Straehler-Pohl I (2009) Die Phylogenie der Rhopaliophora und die Paraphylie der ‘Rhizostomeae’[PhD Thesis]. Universitat Hamburg. 372 p.
  • 36. Straehler-Pohl I, Widmer CL, Morandini AC (2011) Characterizations of juvenile stages of some semaeostome Scyphozoa (Cnidaria), with recognition of a new family (Phacellophoridae). Zootaxa 2741: 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Fuentes V, Straehler-Pohl I, Atienza D, Franco I, Tilves U, et al. (2011) Life cycle of the jellyfish Rhizostoma pulmo (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae) and its distribution, seasonality and inter-annual variability along the Catalan coast and the Mar Menor (Spain, NW Mediterranean). Marine Biology 158: 2247–2266. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Berger EW (1900) The Cubomedusae. Memoirs of the Biological Laboratory of the John Hopkins University 4: 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Straehler-Pohl I (2011) Biology of the box jellyfish Carybdea sivickisi at Akajima. Midoriishi 22: 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Berger EW (1900) Physiology and histology of the Cubomedusae including Dr. F. S. Conant's notes on the physiology: Memoirs from the Biological Laboratory of the John Hopkins University 4: 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Conant FS (1898) The Cubomedusoe. Memories from the Biological Laboratory of the Johns Hopkins University IV: 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Haacke W (1887) Die Sccyphomedusen des St. Vincent Golfes. . Jenaische Naturwissenschaftliche Zeitschrift 20: 588–368. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Stiasny G (1926) Uber Einige scyphomedusen von Puerto Galera, Mindoro. (Philippinen). Zoologische Mededeelingen Rijks Museum van Natuurlijke Historie in Leiden 9: 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Spanenberg DR (1968) Recent studies of strobilation in jellyfish. Oceanographic Marine Biology Annual Review 6: 231–247. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Holst S, Jarms G (2006) Substrate choice and settlment preferences of planula larvae of five Scyphozoa (Cnidaria) from German Bight, North Sea. Marine Biology 151: 863–871. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Brewer RH (1976) Larval settling behaviour in Cyanea capillata (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Biological Bulletin 150: 183–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Brewer RH (1978) Larval settlement behaviour in the jelyfish Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus) (Scyphozoa: Semaeostomeae). Estuaries 1: 120–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stangl K (1997) Zellulare analyse von wachstum und morphogenese bei Carybdea marsupialis (Cnidaria, Cubozoa) [Diploma Thesis]: der Universität Wien. 111 p.
  • 49. Golz R, Thurm U (1993) Ultrastructural evidence for the occurences of three types of mechanosensitive cells in the tentacles of the cubozoan polyp Carybdea marsupialis . Protoplasma 173: 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Werner B, Chapman DM, Cutress C (1976) Muscular and nervous systems of the cubopolyp (Cnidaria). Experientia 32: 1047–1049. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chapman DM (1978) Microanatomy of the cubopolyp, Tripedalia cystophora (Class Cubozoa). Helgolander wiss Meeresunters 31: 128–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mehnert G (1984) Die Metamorphose des Polypen von Tripedalia cystophora (Cubozoa, Carybdeidae) in die meduse [PhD Thesis]: Rheineschen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Bonn. 161 p.
  • 53.Straehler-Pohl I (2001) Die Verwandtschaft dreier Cubozoenarten (Tripedalia cystophora, Carybdea marsupialis und eine unbekannte Art der Cubozoa) aufgrund von Unterschieden in Morphologie, Lebenscyclus und 16s rDNA-Sequenz: Universität Hamburg. 108 p.
  • 54. Calder DR (1973) Laboratory observations on the life history of Rhopilema verrilli (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomaea). Marine Biology 21: 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Calder DR (1982) Life history of the cannonball jellyfish, Stomolophus meleagris L. Agassiz, 1860 (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomida). Biological Bulletin 162: 149–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Pitt KA (2000) Life history and settlement preferences of edible jellyfish Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae). Marine Biology 136: 269–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kawahara M, Uye S, K O, Iizumi H (2006) Unusual population explosion of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae) in East Asian waters. Marine Ecology Progress Series 307: 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Holst S, Sotje I, Tiemann H, Jarms G (2007) Life cycle of the rhizostome jellyfish Rhizostoma octopus (L.) (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomae), with studies on cnidocysts and statoliths. Marine Biology 151: 1695–1710. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Schiariti A, Kawahara M, Uye S, Mianzan HW (2008) Life cycle of the jellyfish Lychnorhiza lucerna (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae). Marine Biology 156: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Fischer AB, Hofmann DK (2004) Budding, bud morphogenesis, and regeneration in Carybdea marsupialis Linnaeus, 1758 (Cnidaria: Cubozoa). Hydrobiologia 530/531: 331–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Werner B (1993) Cnidaria. In: Gruner HE, editor. Lehbuch der Speziellen Zoologie Bd I2 Teil. Jena, Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. pp. 11–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yamaguchi M (1982) Cubozoans and their life histories. Aquabiology Tokyo 4: 248–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Uchida T (1970) Revision of Japanese cubomedusae. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory XVII: 289–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Courtney R, Seymour JE (2013) Seasonality in polyps of a tropical cubozoan: A latina nr. mordens. . PLOS ONE 8: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Mayer AG (1900) Some medusae from the Tortugas, Florida. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 37: 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bentlage B (2012) Phylogenetic systematics, taxonomy and biogeography of Jellyfish (Cnidaria: Medusozoa) [PhD Thesis]: University of Kansas. 174 p.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Time spans for embryology and primary polyp development in Cubozoa.

(DOCX)

Plate S1

Medusae, polyps and asexual reproduction in two Alatina cf moseri populations (Hawaii, Australia).

(DOCX)

Plate S2

Metamorphosis in Alatina cf moseri (Australian population).

(DOCX)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES