Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2013 Jul 11;550:41–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.001

Vesicular glutamate transporter 2 and tyrosine hydroxylase are not co-localized in Syrian hamster nucleus accumbens afferents

Laura E Been a,b, Nancy A Staffend a,c, Avery Tucker a,d, Robert L Meisel a,e
PMCID: PMC3894821  NIHMSID: NIHMS510009  PMID: 23850605

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is an important brain region for motivation, reinforcement, and reward. Afferents to the NAc can be divided into two anatomically-segregated neurochemical phenotypes: dopaminergic inputs, primarily from the midbrain ventral tegmental area (VTA) and glutamatergic inputs from several cortical and sub-cortical structures. A population of glutamatergic neurons exists within the VTA and evidence from rats and mice suggests that these VTA axons may co-release dopamine and glutamate into the NAc. Our laboratory has used sexual experience in Syrian hamsters as a model of experience-dependent plasticity within the NAc. Given that both dopamine and glutamate are involved in this plasticity, it is important to determine whether these neurotransmitters are co-expressed within the mesolimbic pathway of hamsters. We therefore used immunofluorescent staining to investigate the possible co-localization of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a dopaminergic marker, and vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2), a glutamatergic marker, within the mesolimbic pathway. PCR analyses identified VGLUT2 gene expression in the VTA. No co-localization of TH and VGLUT2 protein was detected in NAc fibers, nor was there a difference in immunolabeling between males and females. Further studies are needed to resolve this absence of anatomical co-localization of TH and VGLUT2 in hamster striatal afferents with reports of functional co-release in other rodents.

Keywords: ventral tegmental area, caudate putamen, dopamine, glutamate, co-localization

INTRODUCTION

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a key brain region for motivated behaviors, such as copulation [24, 27, 34], aggression [11, 28, 36], and wheel running [18, 42, 44], as well as in substance abuse and addiction [9, 14, 45]. NAc afferents are primarily comprised of two neurochemical phenotypes: dopamine (DA) and glutamate (GLU). In particular, the NAc receives dense dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA), forming the mesolimbic dopamine pathway [23, 43]. The VTA also projects to cortical and sub-cortical structures including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampal ventral subiculum (VS), basolateral amygdala (BLA), and the central thalamic nucleus (CT), which are main sources of glutamatergic NAc afferents [15, 35, 39].

Historically, dopaminergic and glutamatergic projections to the NAc were identified as distinct populations of cells. More recently a discrete population of glutamatergic neurons has been identified within the VTA [38], whose axons may co-release dopamine and glutamate into the NAc. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that this subset of dopaminergic neurons in the VTA contains vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2) [13], one of the 3 identified vesicular glutamate transporters and a biomarker for glutamatergic cells. Finally, in vitro studies have provided anatomical [13, 25, 38] and functional [10, 29, 40] support for the possibility of dopaminergic VTA neurons releasing GLU into the NAc.

We have used hamster sexual behavior to model the neurobiology of motivation. This model is valuable for elucidating the role of the mesolimbic DA pathway in naturally-occurring, non-pathological motivated behaviors, and also to provide insight into how reproductive physiology and behavior can impact vulnerability to addiction [20, 32]. As such, identifying whether DA and GLU are co-expressed within the mesolimbic pathway of hamsters would contribute to a mechanistic understanding of the neurobiology of motivation this model system. To investigate this, we used immunofluorescent staining of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and VGLUT2 and analyzed the degree of co-localization of axonal labeling within sub-regions of the NAc and caudate-putamen (CPu). As males and females differ in their reproductive physiology and behavior, as well as their response to drugs of abuse and vulnerability to addiction [2], we analyzed this possible co-expression in both male and female hamsters.

METHODS

Animals

Adult male (n = 8) and female (n = 8) Syrian hamsters (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA, USA) were housed 2 per cage under a 14:10 light:dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. Animal procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the University of Minnesota IACUC.

qPCR

An additional 4 males were anesthetized with Sleepaway (0.2 ml, i.p., Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA, USA), rapidly decapitated, and 1-mm thick coronal sections containing either the VTA (Bregma −4.6 mm) or the medial dorsal thalamus (Bregma −1.5 mm) were taken. Bilateral tissue punches (diameter: 0.67 mm) from each area were collected into RNAlater (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and stored overnight at room temperature. mRNA was extracted using a RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and reverse transcribed using a Transcriptor First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA). Because the sequence for VGLUT2 is unknown in Syrian hamsters, primers were designed using known sequences from the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus; Forward: 5’-GAAACCGTGGGGATGATTC-3’; Reverse: 5’-CCGGAATCTGGGTGATGAT-3’).

qPCR amplifications were performed using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche Diagnostics) on a LightCycler 480 II PCR (Roche Diagnostics). PCR for individual cDNA samples was performed in triplicate. Threshold values were calculated using the second derivative max method and standardized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH (LightCycler 480 software version 1.5). The thermal cycling program used a preincubation step at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles consisting of a 10-sec denaturing step at 95°C, annealing step for 10 sec at 60°C, an extension step for 10 sec at 72°C, and a measurement of fluorescent intensity. At the end of each cycling program, a melting curve was run.

Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 and Tyrosine Hydroxylase Staining

Subjects were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of 0.2 ml of Sleepaway (Fort Dodge Animal Health) and transcardially perfused with 25 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.2) for 3 min at a flow rate of 25 ml/min, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 25 mM PBS for 20 min. After perfusion, brains were removed, post-fixed for 1 hr in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and then placed in a 10% sucrose solution in PBS overnight at 4°C.

Serial sections (40 μm) cut from frozen tissue coronally through the rostral-caudal dimension of the nucleus accumbens or sagittally through the lateral-medial dimension were placed into 25 mM PBS with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; wash buffer). Sections then were incubated in primary antibodies for guinea pig anti-vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (1:2000, AB2251, Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) and mouse anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (1:2000, 22941, ImmunoStar, Hudson, WI, USA) in wash buffer plus 0.3% Triton-X 100 for 24 hrs at room temperature, followed by 24 hrs at 4°C. Sections were then rinsed three times for 10 min in wash buffer, and incubated in anti-guinea pig Alexa 488 (1:500, A11001, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and anti-mouse Alexa 633 (1:500, A21105, Invitrogen Life Technologies) in wash buffer for 1 hr at room temperature. Following this incubation, sections were washed three times for 10 min in wash buffer, and then mounted on slides and coverslipped while still wet with 5% n-propyl galate in glycerin.

Confocal Imaging

A Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope (Leica, Mannheim, Germany) was used to image tissue sections labeled with both TH and VGLUT2, tagged with the Alexa 488 or Alexa 633 fluorophore, respectively. The complete 40-μm thickness of the slice was captured with a 63X oil immersion lens using a 5.61 optical zoom and XY pixel distribution of 512 × 512 at a frequency of 400 Hz. The tissue section was scanned every 0.29 μm along the Z-axis until the entire thickness of the slice was imaged. Three images, one at each anatomically-matched plane of section (rostral, middle, and caudal), were collected for each subject. A systematic approach was taken to ensure that sections from each animal were taken from the same anatomical plane. Because the medial-lateral distance between the anterior commissure and ventral tip of the lateral ventricle changes monotonically in the rostro-caudal direction, a template cresyl violet stained section was selected from the rostral, middle and caudal levels of the nucleus accumbens and the distance between the medial edge of the anterior commissure and tip of the lateral ventricle measured. Fluorescent labeled sections were selected for analysis based on those measured distances. Within each section, the dorsal NAc core, dorsal NAc shell and dorsomedial CPu were analyzed. Accordingly, a total of 24 sections (3 sections × 8 animals) and 72 images (3 brain areas × 24 sections) were analyzed in both female and male subjects.

Data Analysis

Unprocessed Z-stack images were reconstructed using the Surpass module of the Imaris software package (Bitplane Inc., South Windsor, CT, USA). The Spot function was used to define a region of interest that was 35 × 35 × 40 μm thick. The Spot function automated Wizard was used to threshold intensity and size of fluorescent labeling obtained from immunofluorescent staining in tissue sections. A total spot count was collected for both TH and VGLUT2 channels in each region of interest. A threshold value of 0.2, requiring minimal overlap of the pixel maps for TH and VGLUT2 identified spots, was used within the Colocalize Spots Wizard to identify presumptive terminals stained for both TH and VGLUT2. Total spot counts were used in a Bonferroni t-test to evaluate whether statistical differences existed between rostral-caudal dimensions or sex (male vs. female) and a χ2 test was used to detect significant differences in the total density of TH or VGLUT2 immunoreactivity between males and females, and to determine whether the number of colocalized spots identified significantly differed from zero.

RESULTS

qPCR demonstrated that in Syrian hamsters, as in other species, the VTA contains mRNA for VGLUT2 (Cp: 27.02 ± 0.62; ΔCt: 5.48 ± 0.56). Neither the mean Cp value (t(6) = 1.12, p > 0.05), nor the mean ΔCt value (t(6) = 0.62, p > 0.05) differed between the VTA and the medial dorsal thalamus (Cp: 26.08 ± 1.54; ΔCt: 5.13 ± 0.98), an area in which VGLUT2 is abundant in rats [21].

Confocal imaging revealed dense immunolabeling of TH-immunoreactive fibers and puncta (Figure 1A) and VGLUT2-immuoreactive puncta (Figure 1B), with few incidents of co-localization of TH and VGLUT2 in NAc and CPu afferents (Figure 1C). Indeed, the total number of co-localized spots did not differ from zero in the NAc shell (Figure 2A, Rostral χ2(1, 29468) = 3.218; Mid χ2(1, 29753) = 0.086; Caudal χ2(1, 25425) = 0.397), NAc core (Figure 2B, Rostral χ2(1, 36050) = 0.958; Mid χ2(1, 37253) = 2.075; Caudal χ2(1, 29430) = 0.091) or CPu (Figure 2C, Rostral χ2(1, 42678) = 0.923; Mid χ2(1, 36564) = 0.068; Caudal χ2(1, 47431) = 0.003), suggesting that dopamine and glutamate are not co-localized in NAc and CPu afferents.

Figure 1. Immunolabeling for TH and VGLUT2 in NAc.

Figure 1

A) TH fibers B) VGLUT2 puncta C) White spots indicate colocalization of TH and VGLUT2.

Figure 2. TH-VGLUT2 colocalization.

Figure 2

No significant colocalization of TH and VGLUT2 was found in the NAc shell, NAc core or Caudate in males or females.

There were no sex differences in the densities of VGLUT2 and TH immunolabeling. The total density of VGLUT2 puncta did not differ between females and males in the NAc shell (Figure 3A, Rostral t(14) = 0.336; Mid t(14) = 1.311; Caudal t(14) = 0.258), NAc core (Figure 3B, Rostral t(14) = 0.097; Mid t(14) = 0.914; Caudal t(14) = 0.266), or CPu (Figure 3C, Rostral t(14) = 0.711; Mid t(14) = 0.1002; Caudal t(14) = 0.557). Similarly, the total density of TH fibers did not differ between females and males in the NAc shell (Figure 3D, Rostral t(14) = 0.593; Mid t(14) = 0.526; Caudal t(14) = 1.056), NAc core (Figure 3E, Rostral t(14) = 0.486; Mid t(14) = 0.249; Caudal t(14) = 0.154), and CPu (Figure 3F, Rostral t(14) = 0.578; Mid t(14) = 0.157; Caudal t(14) = 0.451).

Figure 3. Total density of VGLUT2 and TH puncta in males and females.

Figure 3

No significant differences were found in the numbers of either VGLUT2 (A-C) or TH (D-F) positive puncta in the NAc shell, NAc core or Caudate.

DISCUSSION

We have used sexual experience in female Syrian hamsters as a model of experience-based plasticity in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway. Sexual experience reliably produces changes in NAc analogous to those following chronic exposure to drugs of abuse, including neurochemical sensitization [27], structural plasticity [32], changes in molecular signaling [6, 8, 19], as well as behavioral changes [7, 30, 31]. As both DA and GLU are important for plasticity in the mesolimbic pathway [41, 46], understanding details of DA and GLU innervation to the NAc is an important mechanistic component of this animal model. Here we report that although neurons of the VTA express VGLUT2 mRNA, putative DA axons and terminals within the NAc and CP do not co-localize with VGLUT2 in hamsters. Further, we found no sex difference in total axonal density of TH or VGLUT2, nor did males differ from females in their degree of co-localization. As such, we conclude that TH and VGLUT2 are not co-localized within the mesolimbic pathway of Syrian hamsters, suggesting that DA and GLU might not be co-released from the same terminals.

Though glutamatergic axons contain several VGLUT variants, we chose to measure VGLUT2 expression in this study as 1) previous studies contending DA and GLU co-release from the VTA used VGLUT2 as a biomarker for glutamatergic neurons [13, 26] and 2) that VGLUT2 is more prominent in subcortical and mesencephalic brain areas, including the substantia nigra, VTA, and thalamus [21]. In contrast, VGLUT1 provides innervation to the nucleus accumbens primarily from the cortex and hippocampus, and VGLUT3 shows a rather restricted pattern of neural expression unrelated to our brain regions of interest [22].

Our observation that there is essentially no co-localization of dopaminergic and glutamatergic innervation of the NAc is in agreement with neuroanatomical data from adult rats [3, 33, 47], including the absence of a sex difference in the expression of either TH or VGLUT2 [16]. These anatomical findings are at odds however with in vitro and in vivo evidence in rat and mice demonstrating GLU release by VTA dopamine neurons. Specifically, putative dopaminergic neurons from the VTA establish glutamatergic autapses in cell culture [5, 38] or form glutamatergic synapses when co-cultured with NAc medium spiny neurons (MSNs) [25]. Further, electrophysiological work conducted in tissue slices from mice demonstrates that stimulating dopaminergic cell bodies within the VTA elicits monosynaptic glutamatergic responses in MSNs within the NAc [10]. A potential resolution to this discrepancy lies in the use of neonatal to preweanling rat pups in the studies demonstrating co-release of DA and GLU. A maturational loss of TH/VGLUT2 phenotype of mesencephalic dopamine neurons has been demonstrated by others [3, 12, 17], so perhaps the co-release of DA and GLU within the mesolimbic pathway is a developmental event not maintained into adulthood.

Our finding that TH and VGLUT2 are not co-localized within the mesolimbic pathway of Syrian hamsters suggest that in this species, either dopaminergic and glutamatergic input to the NAc originate from anatomically segregated populations of cells, or alternately, that TH and VGLUT2 proteins segregate to different axon terminals of individual VTA dopaminergic neurons [3, 17]. A lingering paradox, however, is the existence of studies that demonstrate the co-release of DA and GLU in NAc afferents of adult mice. For example, using optogenetics to selectively activate dopaminergic afferents to the nucleus accumbens in tissue slices results in GLU release and elicits GLU-mediated excitatory post-synaptic responses [37, 40]. Further, this optically-evoked GLU release is blocked by conditional knock-out of VGLUT2 in DA neurons [37]. Evidence from in vivo models also suggests a functional role for GLU in dopaminergic afferents of the nucleus accumbens. Adult mice in which VGLUT2 has been selectively deleted from midbrain DA neurons show a blunted locomotor response to amphetamine [4], display enhanced self-administration of cocaine and high-sucrose food, and enhanced maintenance of cued drug-seeking [1]. Though these two finding are somewhat conflicting, both suggest that the absence of VGLUT2 in mesolimbic DA neurons impacts behavioral responding to natural rewards and drugs of abuse. As conventional light and electron microscopic studies consistently fail to find anatomical colocalization of TH and VGLUT2 in nucleus accumbens afferents, the resolution to the conflict between the anatomical and functional studies may require more creative methodological approaches.

Highlights.

  • In Syrian hamsters, like in other species, VGLUT2 mRNA is present in the VTA.

  • VGLUT2 does not co-localize with TH-positive fibers in the NAc or CPu in hamsters.

  • The density of VGLUT-2- and TH-positive fibers/cells did not differ between sexes in hamsters.

  • One interpretation is that DA and GLU are not co-released from the same terminals in NAc afferents.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Research in this publication was supported by DA013680 to RLM. LEB and NAS were supported by NIDA under award number T32DA007234 and AT was supported by NSF grant under award number IOS1232908. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alsio J, Nordenankar K, Arvidsson E, Birgner C, Mahmoudi S, Halbout B, Smith C, Fortin GM, Olson L, Descarries L, Trudeau LE, Kullander K, Levesque D, Wallen-Mackenzie A. Enhanced sucrose and cocaine self-administration and cue-induced drug seeking after loss of VGLUT2 in midbrain dopamine neurons in mice. J Neurosci. 2011;31:12593–12603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2397-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Becker JB, Hu M. Sex differences in drug abuse. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berube-Carriere N, Riad M, Dal Bo G, Levesque D, Trudeau LE, Descarries L. The dual dopamine-glutamate phenotype of growing mesencephalic neurons regresses in mature rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 2009;517:873–891. doi: 10.1002/cne.22194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Birgner C, Nordenankar K, Lundblad M, Mendez JA, Smith C, le Greves M, Galter D, Olson L, Fredriksson A, Trudeau LE, Kullander K, Wallen-Mackenzie A. VGLUT2 in dopamine neurons is required for psychostimulant-induced behavioral activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:389–394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910986107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bourque MJ, Trudeau LE. GDNF enhances the synaptic efficacy of dopaminergic neurons in culture. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3172–3180. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bradley KC, Boulware MB, Jiang H, Doerge RW, Meisel RL, Mermelstein PG. Changes in gene expression within the nucleus accumbens and striatum following sexual experience. Genes, brain, and behavior. 2005;4:31–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bradley KC, Meisel RL. Sexual behavior induction of c-Fos in the nucleus accumbens and amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity are sensitized by previous sexual experience in female Syrian hamsters. J Neurosci. 2001;21:2123–2130. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-06-02123.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bradley KC, Mullins AJ, Meisel RL, Watts VJ. Sexual experience alters D1 receptor-mediated cyclic AMP production in the nucleus accumbens of female Syrian hamsters. Synapse. 2004;53:20–27. doi: 10.1002/syn.20030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen BT, Hopf FW, Bonci A. Synaptic plasticity in the mesolimbic system: therapeutic implications for substance abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1187:129–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05154.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chuhma N, Zhang H, Masson J, Zhuang X, Sulzer D, Hen R, Rayport S. Dopamine neurons mediate a fast excitatory signal via their glutamatergic synapses. J Neurosci. 2004;24:972–981. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4317-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Couppis MH, Kennedy CH. The rewarding effect of aggression is reduced by nucleus accumbens dopamine receptor antagonism in mice. Psychopharmacology. 2008;197:449–456. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-1054-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dal Bo G, Berube-Carriere N, Mendez JA, Leo D, Riad M, Descarries L, Levesque D, Trudeau LE. Enhanced glutamatergic phenotype of mesencephalic dopamine neurons after neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesion. Neuroscience. 2008;156:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dal Bo G, St-Gelais F, Danik M, Williams S, Cotton M, Trudeau LE. Dopamine neurons in culture express VGLUT2 explaining their capacity to release glutamate at synapses in addition to dopamine. Journal of neurochemistry. 2004;88:1398–1405. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Everitt BJ, Wolf ME. Psychomotor stimulant addiction: a neural systems perspective. J Neurosci. 2002;22:3312–3320. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03312.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fallon JH, Moore RY. Catecholamine innervation of the basal forebrain. IV. Topography of the dopamine projection to the basal forebrain and neostriatum. J Comp Neurol. 1978;180:545–580. doi: 10.1002/cne.901800310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Forlano PM, Woolley CS. Quantitative analysis of pre- and postsynaptic sex differences in the nucleus accumbens. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:1330–1348. doi: 10.1002/cne.22279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fortin GM, Bourque MJ, Mendez JA, Leo D, Nordenankar K, Birgner C, Arvidsson E, Rymar VV, Berube-Carriere N, Claveau AM, Descarries L, Sadikot AF, Wallen-Mackenzie A, Trudeau LE. Glutamate corelease promotes growth and survival of midbrain dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17477–17491. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1939-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Greenwood BN, Foley TE, Le TV, Strong PV, Loughridge AB, Day HE, Fleshner M. Long-term voluntary wheel running is rewarding and produces plasticity in the mesolimbic reward pathway. Behav Brain Res. 2011;217:354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hedges VL, Chakravarty S, Nestler EJ, Meisel RL. Delta FosB overexpression in the nucleus accumbens enhances sexual reward in female Syrian hamsters. Genes, brain, and behavior. 2009;8:442–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00491.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hedges VL, Staffend NA, Meisel RL. Neural mechanisms of reproduction in females as a predisposing factor for drug addiction. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. 2010;31:217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herzog E, Bellenchi GC, Gras C, Bernard V, Ravassard P, Bedet C, Gasnier B, Giros B, El Mestikawy S. The existence of a second vesicular glutamate transporter specifies subpopulations of glutamatergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC181. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-22-j0001.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Herzog E, Gilchrist J, Gras C, Muzerelle A, Ravassard P, Giros B, Gaspar P, El Mestikawy S. Localization of VGLUT3, the vesicular glutamate transporter type 3, in the rat brain. Neuroscience. 2004;123:983–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ikemoto S. Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Res Rev. 2007;56:27–78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jenkins WJ, Becker JB. Role of the striatum and nucleus accumbens in paced copulatory behavior in the female rat. Behav Brain Res. 2001;121:119–128. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00394-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Joyce MP, Rayport S. Mesoaccumbens dopamine neuron synapses reconstructed in vitro are glutamatergic. Neuroscience. 2000;99:445–456. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00219-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kawano M, Kawasaki A, Sakata-Haga H, Fukui Y, Kawano H, Nogami H, Hisano S. Particular subpopulations of midbrain and hypothalamic dopamine neurons express vesicular glutamate transporter 2 in the rat brain. J Comp Neurol. 2006;498:581–592. doi: 10.1002/cne.21054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kohlert JG, Meisel RL. Sexual experience sensitizes mating-related nucleus accumbens dopamine responses of female Syrian hamsters. Behav Brain Res. 1999;99:45–52. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(98)00068-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Korzan WJ, Forster GL, Watt MJ, Summers CH. Dopaminergic activity modulation via aggression, status, and a visual social signal. Behav Neurosci. 2006;120:93–102. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.1.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lavin A, Nogueira L, Lapish CC, Wightman RM, Phillips PE, Seamans JK. Mesocortical dopamine neurons operate in distinct temporal domains using multimodal signaling. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5013–5023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0557-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meisel RL, Joppa MA. Conditioned place preference in female hamsters following aggressive or sexual encounters. Physiol Behav. 1994;56:1115–1118. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90352-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meisel RL, Joppa MA, Rowe RK. Dopamine receptor antagonists attenuate conditioned place preference following sexual behavior in female Syrian hamsters. European journal of pharmacology. 1996;309:21–24. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(96)00389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Meisel RL, Mullins AJ. Sexual experience in female rodents: cellular mechanisms and functional consequences. Brain Res. 2006;1126:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nair-Roberts RG, Chatelain-Badie SD, Benson E, White-Cooper H, Bolam JP, Ungless MA. Stereological estimates of dopaminergic, GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra and retrorubral field in the rat. Neuroscience. 2008;152:1024–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pfaus JG, Damsma G, Nomikos GG, Wenkstern DG, Blaha CD, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC. Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat. Brain Res. 1990;530:345–348. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91309-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Phillipson OT. Afferent projections to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and interfascicular nucleus: a horseradish peroxidase study in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1979;187:117–143. doi: 10.1002/cne.901870108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Staffend NA, Meisel RL. Aggressive experience increases dendritic spine density within the nucleus accumbens core in female Syrian hamsters. Neuroscience. 2012;227:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.09.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stuber GD, Hnasko TS, Britt JP, Edwards RH, Bonci A. Dopaminergic terminals in the nucleus accumbens but not the dorsal striatum corelease glutamate. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8229–8233. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1754-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sulzer D, Joyce MP, Lin L, Geldwert D, Haber SN, Hattori T, Rayport S. Dopamine neurons make glutamatergic synapses in vitro. J Neurosci. 1998;18:4588–4602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04588.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Swanson LW. The projections of the ventral tegmental area and adjacent regions: a combined fluorescent retrograde tracer and immunofluorescence study in the rat. Brain Res Bull. 1982;9:321–353. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(82)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tecuapetla F, Patel JC, Xenias H, English D, Tadros I, Shah F, Berlin J, Deisseroth K, Rice ME, Tepper JM, Koos T. Glutamatergic signaling by mesolimbic dopamine neurons in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7105–7110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0265-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thomas MJ, Kalivas PW, Shaham Y. Neuroplasticity in the mesolimbic dopamine system and cocaine addiction. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:327–342. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vargas-Perez H, Mena-Segovia J, Giordano M, Diaz JL. Induction of c-fos in nucleus accumbens in naive male Balb/c mice after wheel running. Neurosci Lett. 2003;352:81–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Voorn P, Jorritsma-Byham B, Van Dijk C, Buijs RM. The dopaminergic innervation of the ventral striatum in the rat: a light- and electron-microscopical study with antibodies against dopamine. J Comp Neurol. 1986;251:84–99. doi: 10.1002/cne.902510106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Werme M, Messer C, Olson L, Gilden L, Thoren P, Nestler EJ, Brene S. Delta FosB regulates wheel running. J Neurosci. 2002;22:8133–8138. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-18-08133.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Willuhn I, Wanat MJ, Clark JJ, Phillips PE. Dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens of animals self-administering drugs of abuse. Current topics in behavioral neurosciences. 2010;3:29–71. doi: 10.1007/7854_2009_27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wolf ME, Mangiavacchi S, Sun X. Mechanisms by which dopamine receptors may influence synaptic plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;1003:241–249. doi: 10.1196/annals.1300.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yamaguchi T, Sheen W, Morales M. Glutamatergic neurons are present in the rat ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:106–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES