Abstract
Junior doctors write the majority of hospital prescriptions but many indicate they feel underprepared to assume this responsibility and around 10% of prescriptions contain errors. Medical smartphone apps are now widely used in clinical practice and present an opportunity to provide support to inexperienced prescribers. This study assesses the contemporary range of smartphone apps with prescribing or related content. Six smartphone app stores were searched for apps aimed at the healthcare professional with drug, pharmacology or prescribing content. Three hundred and six apps were identified. 34% appeared to be for use within the clinical environment in order to aid prescribing, 14% out with the clinical setting and 51% of apps were deemed appropriate for both clinical and non-clinical use. Apps with drug reference material, such as textbooks, manuals or medical apps with drug information were the commonest apps found (51%), followed by apps offering drug or infusion rate dose calculation (26%). 68% of apps charged for download, with a mean price of £14.25 per app and a range of £0.62–101.90. A diverse range of pharmacology-themed apps are available and there is further potential for the development of contemporary apps to improve prescribing performance. Personalized app stores may help universities/healthcare organizations offer high quality apps to students to aid in pharmacology education. Users of prescribing apps must be aware of the lack of information regarding the medical expertise of app developers. This will enable them to make informed choices about the use of such apps in their clinical practice.
Keywords: apps, education, e-learning, pharmacology, prescribing, smartphone
Introduction
Prescribing is one of the commonest tasks undertaken by junior doctors and is often critical to the success of medical therapy. However it may also give rise to potential compromise to patient safety. Recent studies have shown that the rate of prescribing errors by doctors in their first 2 years of practice varies between 7 and 10% [1, 2]. The causes are multifactorial but include lack of knowledge and training in relation to prescribing [1, 3, 4], lack of support in the workplace and pressure of work. Root cause analysis has identified common themes including inadequate knowledge of the drug or the patient [5], failure to select appropriate drug dosages [1, 6] and lack of knowledge of a relevant rule, for example how to adjust a drug dose for a patient in renal failure [7]. Although most of these errors are perpetrated by junior staff, it is clear that the error rate is also significant amongst more senior doctors [1].
Although prescribing will always be a challenging and complex task there appears to be room for improvement based on better training and support of prescribers, particularly in their early years of training. The increasing availability of modern computer-based technology offers potential solutions. The emergence of electronic prescribing with decision support systems has been shown to produce significant reductions in error rates [8]. Although these are extremely expensive and are not widely implemented, the availability of handheld computing means that it might still be possible to harness many of these gains in the absence of an e-prescribing system.
More than 85% of clinicians are now owners of smartphones, with approximately 50% using smartphone applications, or ‘apps’, in their clinical practice [9]. There are a diverse range of medical smartphone apps, providing a wealth of information and resource to support clinical decision making [10]. Studies have described apps for pain management [11], microbiology [12], orthopaedics [13], dermatology [14] and colorectal surgery [15] to name a few. It has already been demonstrated that medical smartphone apps have positive results over standard textbooks in dose calculation [16] whilst also serving as potentially valuable educational tools in resource-limited settings [17, 18].
The aims of this study were to: (i) review the current availability of smartphone apps that directly assist healthcare workers in writing and administering safe and effective drug prescriptions and (ii) review the availability of apps aimed at healthcare professionals which offer drug reference information or provide pharmacology educational support.
Methods
We conducted a search on the six main smartphone app stores (Google Android ‘Play Store’, iOS ‘Appstore’, Windows Phone ‘Marketplace’, BlackBerry ‘App World’, Symbian ‘Nokia Ovi’ Store and Bada ‘Samsung Apps’ store) between 26 January 2013 to 1 February 2013 for apps which provided drug reference and prescribing material for the healthcare professional. Search terms were ‘prescribing’, ‘drug safety’, ‘drug dose’, ‘drug calculation’ and ‘formulary’, which were based on keywords from the publication ‘Outcomes from the Medical Schools Council Safe Prescribing Working Group’ [19] which outlines core prescribing competencies for junior doctors in the UK. Apps were included if they contained information or tools concerned with prescribing, drugs, intravenous infusions or pharmacology and if they were specifically aimed at the healthcare professional rather than the lay person (for example, apps aimed at patients to serve as medication reminders or to record their medication lists were not included in the results). Data on apps were sourced from individual app descriptions or associated webpage links on app stores prior to download. Apps were subsequently categorized according to principal function. Those priced in US dollars were converted to pounds sterling as per the exchange rate on 2 February 2013 (1 US$ = 0.636963 GB£) and where apps were available on more than one app store average of price was taken. Information on app user rating was taken from app store pages. Apps were rated out of a score of 5 (1 = low, 5 = high). Data on app release date or most recent update were also collected. For apps with a release date as well as date of update, the latter was used for data analysis since this was deemed to be the most recent time point at which the app was reviewed and modified by its developers. For those without details of update, release date was taken to be the date of most recent review. For apps which were available on more than one store, averages of user rating, number of raters, date of last update and price were taken for the purposes of data analysis.
Results
Three hundred and six apps were identified meeting our search criteria. Two hundred and seventy-five (90%) were available on single app stores, whilst 31 (10%) apps were available on multiple stores. 70% of apps were available on Android's ‘Google Play’ store. Table 1 outlines apps per store.
Table 1.
App store (operating system) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appstore (iOS) | Play Store (Android) | BlackBerry App World (Blackberry) | Marketplace (Windows Phone) | Ovi (Nokia) store (Symbian) | Samsung Apps (Bada) | |
Number of unique apps (n = 275) | 43 | 215 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
Number of duplicated apps (n = 31) | 21 | 31 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
Intended environment for app use
Apps were categorized according to their intended area of use. One hundred and four (34%) apps were identified which would be of use in directly supporting prescribing within the clinical environment. These included apps with drug calculation capabilities (n = 31), intravenous drip or dilution calculators (n = 20), apps which were able to calculate both drug doses and drip infusion rates (n = 5), medical or drug reference apps which included drug dose or infusion calculator functions (n = 25), drug interaction checkers (n = 4), e-prescribing apps (n = 3) and drug formularies (n = 14). Other apps included a drug reference resource which also allowed healthcare workers to log clinical events and medications given in ‘real time’, and an app permitting pharmacists to monitor their patients controlled drug usage (Table 2). Forty-seven (15%) apps were identified as for use predominantly out with the clinical environment. These were exam revision aids (n = 6), journals (n = 6), flashcards, quizzes, tutorials and other interactive learning aids (n = 26), news, drug information and research update apps from the US Federal Drug Agency (n = 7), a pharmaceutical company drug guide and an app accessing an online medical news, reviews and educational website (Table 3). One hundred and fifty-five (51%) apps appeared suitable for use both in and outside of the clinical environment. Thirty of these were drug handbooks or textbooks converted into app format, 56 were other types of drug reference app, 46 medical reference apps with drug information and 16 medical textbooks or handbooks with drug information. Six apps offered purely antibiotic related material. Another app provided information for doctors on where their patients can acquire discount prescription drugs (Table 4).
Table 2.
Drug calculators | Medical or drug reference app with drug dose/infusion calculator function | Drip/infusion rate calculators | |
Gentamicin | Medcalc 3000 Complete | IV drip rate | |
Dosage Calc | Chemotherapy CS | Emergency Drugs | |
Paeds ED | MedCalc 3000 Kidney | Drip calculator | |
Dose Calc | MedCalc 3000 Neurology | Infusion Rate | |
Drug Doses | Medcalc 3000 Endocrine | Dosage calc | |
Kid-eCalc | Medcalc 3000 GI | NurseCalcs | |
InfusiCalc | Tarascon Pharmacopoeia | Infusion rate | |
Paramedic Dosage | PEPID | Infusion therapy | |
Pediatric Epinephrine | EP Mobile | IV Drip Rate Professional | |
Stat Meds Lite | EM Suite | Medication infusion | |
Medical Abacus | Fraser EMS | Drips and pumps | |
Thrombate III Calculator | Adult Anesthesia | InfusionCalc | |
Kids Drug Dosage Calc – PaedRx | Medical Tools | Nursing Tool & IV Drips | |
Aurora for android | Pharmacy Technician Toolkit | ||
IRCALC-Drug Dosage in RF | Medical Calculators | Anesthesia Infusion | |
Anesthesiologist | IV Drips | OmniMedix Medical Calculator | |
Kid Dose | EMS Notes | IV Drip Rate Calculator | |
Antibiotic Kinetics | Critical Medical Guide | IV Infusion Calc | |
Medcalc 3000 Pharmcaology | Calculate by QxMD | BS3 Drip Calculator | |
Pediatric Anesthesia | AvidNurse | Infusion Nurse | |
Speedy Dose | CheckMate PDA | ||
RSI Calculator | PICA | Drug dose and infusion calculators | |
Digoxin Calculator | BS3 Basic Tools Pack | ||
Accutane Calculator | Emergency Drugs Pocket | Vasopressors | |
NeoDose | Skyscape Rx drugs | Neonatal Infusion Therapy | |
AneIV Lite – Anesthesia Aid | Anesthesia Calc | ||
Pharmacy Calculator | Drug formularies | Nursing Calculators | |
Child Dose | Anesthesia Calculator | ||
Flush Calculator | NICEBNF | ||
IV-MedCalc | NHS Lanarkshire Formulary | e-Prescribers | |
DentalSTAT | BNF for Children | ||
Opioid Converter | NHS Forth Valley Formulary | MTBC iRx | |
British National Formulary | RxNT eRx | ||
Interaction checkers | NHS Highland Formulary | RxPad | |
BNF for Children 2012–2013 | |||
Prescription checker | Custom Paramedic Formulary | Others | |
Drug interactions | NFI 2011 | ||
HEPi Chart | Drug Formulary – Cancer Care Ontario | Safe Dose | |
Adverse drug interactions tool | PMPreport Drug Monitoring | ||
NHS Tayside | |||
Neonatal Formulary | |||
NICEBNFC | |||
IA PDF |
Table 3.
Flashcards, quizzes, tutorials and other interactive learning aids | Exam revision aids |
Nursing Pharmacology | Pharmacy Tech Certification |
Nursing Pharmacology – quiz | NCLEX Medication Flashcards |
Pharmacology by WAGmob | PTCB Exam Review |
Medical Prescription Abbr Quiz | NPS Exam Flashcards |
265+Rx Abbreviation Quiz | NPS Exam Secrets |
Prescription Trivia | PharmPrep: NAPLEX Exam Preparation |
Top 200 Drugs Quiz and Card | |
Pharmacy Technician | Journals |
Medical Drug Quiz | |
Top 200 Treatment Drugs Brand/Generic | Pharmacist's Letter |
Diabetes Mellitus apc | HPJ Now |
Warfarin Doser | Oncology Nurse Advisor |
Symptom to Diagnosis | Pharmacy Technician's Letter |
Anesthesiology a-pocketcards | The Medical Letter |
Chief Resident Pearls Free | Formulary |
Acute Coronary Syndrome a-pocketcards | |
Drug Information Flashcards | Federal Drug Association (FDA) resources |
Pharmacy 101 by WAGmob | |
Antibiotics a-pocketcards | Mobile PDR Prescribers Edition |
Pediatrics apocketcards | Mobile PDR |
Heart Failure a-pocketcards | FDA News Reader (food and drug administration) |
PTCB Prep | Drug Checker (pregnancy and lactation) |
Davis Mobile Pharm Phlash | FDA Drugs Free |
irx | Mobile PDR |
Dose Coach | Medwatcher Drug/Device/Vaccine |
Adult Drug Calculations | |
Others | |
onMedica | |
iPharm: Discount Drug Plans |
Table 4.
Drug textbooks and handbooks | Drug references (other) | Medical reference apps with drug information |
OAPN Statin Prescribing Guide | Monthly Prescribing Reference | Complete Nurse |
Davis Drug Guide | MIMS | Pediatric Support |
Nurses Drug Handbook | Maudsley Prescribing Guide in Psychiatry | Epocrates |
IV Drug Handbook | Anesthesia | |
Drugs in Emergency and ICU | Drug and Prescription Medication | West Midlands Paediatric Palliative Care Network |
Drugs for Pregnant and Lactating | Janssen HIV | |
Psychiatric Drug Therapy | Professional Mobile Resource | Emergency |
AHFS Drug Information | AAeARx | Poisoning and Drug Overdose |
Nurse's Pocket Drug Guide 2011 | Infant Risk Center Healthcare Reference Guide | ERres |
Drug Index and Guide | Medscape | |
LWW Nursing Drugs Handbook | PediDoser | Clinical Advisor |
Clinician's Drug Reference 2011 | ChemoDosing | iGeriatrics |
Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses | ICU Critical Care Drips Drugs | DiAppBetes |
Davis's Drug Guide – Physicians | EMS Pocket Drug Guide | AF-STROKE |
Sota Amoigui's Anesthesia Drugs | iPharmacy – Pill Identifier and Drug Guide | 10 Second EM |
2013 Nursing Drugs Handbook | Pediatric Oncall | |
ANZ Drug Guide | Drug Monograph | Medicine Central |
Nurse's Drug Handbook | Mbook 4.0 Drug Indication | CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines |
Omoigui's Pain Drugs Handbook | Mbook 4.0 Drug and Dose | Pediatric Care Online |
Medications and Mothers' Milk | Mbook 5.0 Medical Toxicology | Nursing Essentials |
Intravenous Medications | Mbook 2.0 Pharmacology 2 | Nurse's Toolbox |
Essential Cancer Pharmacology | Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary | Skyscape Oncology Suite |
Clinical Psychopharmacology | Skyscape Primary Care Suite | |
Mosby's Nursing Drug Reference | Mbook 1.0 Mobile Pharmacology | Skyscape Dermatology Suite |
Manual of IV Therapeutics | Mbook 2.0 Mobile Pharmacology 2 | MedCalc 3000 Pediatrics |
Lippinicots Nursing Drug Guide | Prescription Adviser | BS3 Cardiology Pack |
Physicians Cancer Chemotherapy | Chemotherapy Advisor | Hepatitis C Guidelines |
Nursing 2012 Drug Handbook | VIDAL Monographs 2012 | CRRT-Extrarenal Purification |
Pearson Nurse's Drug Guide | Drug Doses | BS3 Nephrology Pack |
Handbook of Combination Drugs | Dental Prescriber | Practical Urology |
Lactation Doctor | Eres – Emergency Medicine | |
NPC Opioid Guidelines | Perioperative Care | |
Medical textbooks or handbooks with drug information | Drug Information System | Urology for Gynecologists |
Cardiology Drug Guide | Skyscape Medical Resources | |
On Call Principles and Protocols | Micromedex Drug Information | Sepsis Clinical Guide |
Patient Safety Manual | Generic Drugs Encyclopedia | Boka's Notes |
Harriet Lane Handbook | Paramedic Meds | MedCalc 3000 Cardiac |
EMS BLS guide | Pedi STAT | Clinical Constellation |
Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry | Drug Guide for Paramedics | NurseTabs: Fundamentals |
EMS ACLS Guide | Drugs Guide | ADHD Psychopharmaoclogy |
Critical Care ACLS guide | Vademecum | Psych Notes: Clinical Guide |
Nursing Central | smartMecum | Clinical Anesthesia Procedures |
Emergency Medicine Handbook | STAT intubation: anesthesia | Nurse Tabs: Complete |
AAP Red Book | Diabetes Pharma | AACN Critical Care Nursing |
Manual of Childhood Infections | Pharmacology Study Guide | Pocket Reference for ALS |
Hopkins Gynaecology and Obstetric | Emergency Medications EMS | Schizophrenia Pharmacology |
Pediatric Dosing Made Easy | ||
Rnotes | Critical Care Drips | Practical Urology for Primary Care |
Oxford Handbook of Anesthesia | Pedi Safe Medications | |
Manual of Critical Care | Pharmacotherapy Handbook 8th ed | |
Emergencies in Anesthesia | Pedi Anesthesia | Others |
Practical Analgesia | ||
Antibiotic resources | Medicines Compendium UK | Medical Information |
Study Notes for EMT's | ||
Drugs and Bugs | NurseTabs: Pharmacology | |
Nelson's Pediatric Abx Therapy | Washington Manual: Therapeutic | |
Microguide | CPS Essentials by CPhA | |
Sepsis Antibiotic Guideline | Lexicomp | |
Sanford Guide | Epilepsy Treatment | |
Tap On The Bugs | Drug interactions (A-Z) |
Details of app price, update, and user rating
Two hundred and eight (68%) apps charged for download, with a mean price of £14.25 per app and a range of £0.62–101.90. Ninety (29%) apps were free to download. The remaining eight apps (3%) were free to download for those working with the National Health Service (n = 1), to doctors working within the United States (n = 1) or after payment of an online subscription (n = 6). Of charged apps, 110 (53%) cost less than £5 for purchase. Three hundred apps (98%) provided information about most recent update or app release date. One hundred and thirty-six of these (45%) had either been released or updated within the last 6 months, a further 74 within 1 year, 67 within 2 years, 19 within 3 years and four within 4 years. Five apps made no mention of a date of release or update (Figure 1). One hundred and ninety-six apps (64%) were rated by users on online app stores out of a score of 5. Average rating was 3.8 with a median number of six raters per app and a range of 1–15 533 raters.
Details of medical involvement in app creation
Medical input into app creation or design was estimated to be present in 206 apps (67%), whereas in the remaining 33% there was no evidence from app description or associated webpages that there had been medical or professional involvement in app development. Apps were assumed to include medical input if they were either medical textbooks, guidelines or protocols converted into app format, apps produced by eHealth or mobile medical app developers, a University department, health trust, Federal Drug Agency, nursing, allied or other health professional, a recognized medical society or association, or developed by a medical publishing company. Table 5 outlines the input of medical or associated healthcare professionals in app creation and development. Six apps provided medical references for the information they contained within their apps (one of which was an app with unknown developer qualification), and 18% of apps had disclaimers assuming no liability for patient harm made through app use.
Table 5.
Apps with suggested medical involvement (n = 206) | |
Medical/nursing/allied health professional textbook, journal, or manual | 64 |
Medical app/eHealth software developer | 46 |
University department | 5 |
Physician involvement in app creation or app company | 30 |
Pharmacology or M.D. degree | 7 |
Federal Drug Agency (United States) | 7 |
Nursing/allied or other health professional (dentist, paramedic) or association | 17 |
Health trust | 11 |
Medical guidelines/protocols | 3 |
Recognized medical association or society | 7 |
Medical publisher (not in format of textbook etc.) | 9 |
Apps without evidence of medical involvement (n = 100) | |
Test preparation resource developer | 2 |
Non-medical app/software developer | 41 |
Pharmaceutical company | 4 |
Others | 4 |
Unknown | 49 |
Discussion
Our search has demonstrated that there are currently a large and diverse number of smartphone apps available to support prescribing practice. The majority of these are apps that offer the potential to improve ease and accuracy of drug dose calculation and intravenous drug delivery. In addition, a wealth of educational resources for pharmacology are also now widely available in mobile app format, allowing users greater ease of access to and portability of popular textbooks and journals, as well as mobile pharmacy exam preparation resources. The majority of apps are either free or cost less than £5. However apps costing up to £101.90 for a full app version of a textbook may be prohibitively expensive to some users.
Smartphone apps are rapidly expanding into the medical sphere both on a national and international level [10]. Software developers, doctors and other healthcare sector workers are being encouraged to develop ideas for medical apps and supported in the development process [20]. Within the UK, the Department of Health has recently encouraged GPs to recommend apps to patients, providing a means to empower patients with the information needed to make health-related choices and encouraging individual responsibility for health [21]. However, clinicians need to be familiar with the technology and have awareness of what medical apps are available. Educating doctors regarding mobile health at an undergraduate, ‘grass-roots’ level may be what is needed in order to promote this change.
Given the multitude and diversity of medical apps available, the need for quality control is vital. Indeed, current concerns surrounding the reliability of content offered by some contemporary medical apps have been reported [12, 14, 15, 22]. In our own study of opioid convertors, there was a wide range in the conversion doses of several opioids between apps (for example, 1 mg of oral morphine to oral codeine demonstrated a range of 3.3–12 mg) and a significant difference was found in the conversion doses of one opioid between apps with and without medical involvement in their design and content [23]. The results of this study also suggest that some apps have not been updated for several years, further calling into question the accuracy and reliability of content.
The Medical Device Directive (MDD) oversees regulation of medical apps within the European Union. However there is current debate regarding which apps fall into the category of a ‘medical device’. Definitions of a ‘medical device’ vary between countries. This results in a lack of consistent regulation across Europe over which, and to what extent, apps must conform to the legislation set out by the directive. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration has set out proposals regarding its intentions to regulate apps falling under the definition of a medical device. However these recommendations are not as yet legal requirements. The current situation regarding medical app regulation globally is under rapid development and it is likely that as the medical app market expands, more thorough and consistent regulation in this area will emerge.
In light of current deficits in medical app screening or peer review prior to marketing, individual organizations (such as Happtique [24] or the Medical App Journal [25]) aim to provide some element of ‘blue-ribbon’ approval. This process could be expanded into undergraduate medical education, with universities or healthcare organizations creating their own apps or app repositories for peer reviewed apps deemed suitable for use by their medical undergraduates. The development of ‘in house’ apps may also help to target the current shortfall in the prescribing competencies of medical undergraduates. In doing so, private repositories could provide institutions with the means of ensuring that only high quality, peer reviewed apps are recommended to students or healthcare workers. Setting this precedent early on in a medical students' education and equipping them with the skills to identify such apps, would hopefully encourage students to adopt the principles of app appraisal in their medical career.
Given the popularity of e-learning in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics teaching, educational smartphone apps have the potential to improve the prescribing performance of junior doctors. Current pharmacology e-learning resources may lend themselves well to a smartphone app version by offering greater portability and accessibility within clinical environments. They may also offer the potential to combine self-directed teaching with simulated prescribing scenarios, and offer easier access to personalized student formularies. However, more research is needed into the type and format of apps which could help to improve prescribing performance.
Whilst there are limitations to our study ((i) our search criteria, although broad, may not have picked up every app with pharmacology content that is currently available through the app stores, (ii) details on app content and function were based on sometimes limited app store information and (iii) app rating does not necessarily reflect the quality of individual apps), there is nevertheless evidence that a wealth of useful apps exist and there is great potential for further development. There are many apps which facilitate drug dose calculation, including those which educate the user on adjustments to doses for patient-specific factors. It is possible that such apps could help to broach the current deficits in the prescribing knowledge and competencies of medical trainees. It is also evident that medical undergraduate education needs to reflect the current trends towards mobile healthcare delivery. Given the rapid development in the medical app field, it is important that the new generation of doctors are equipped with the knowledge and skills to assess the benefits and risks of the use of such apps in their clinical practice.
At present, with a distinct lack of information on app stores, as well as inconsistent regulatory oversight, clinical prescribers cannot confidently assess the reliability of apps available. For this reason, users of such apps must be wary of the inherent dangers in basing clinical decisions on apps available in online stores. This is particularly relevant to the field of prescribing where patient safety can be easily compromised by inaccurate drug information or dose calculation.
Competing Interests
All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author). SM and FH declare no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. RB declares no support from any organization for the submitted work, RB is the owner of ResearchActive.com, a company which develops medical apps and provides mHealth solutions and has no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
- 1.Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, Tully M, Wass V. An in depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education – EQUIP study. General Medical Council 2009.
- 2.Ross S, Ryan C, Duncan EM, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Ker JS, Lee AJ, MacLeod MJ, Maxwell S, McKay G, McLay J, Webb DJ, Bond C. Perceived causes of prescribing errors by junior doctors in hospital inpatients: a study from the PROTECT programme. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:97–102. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heaton A, Webb DJ, Maxwell SRJ. Undergraduate preparation for prescribing: the views of 2314 UK medical students and recent graduates. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;66:128–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03197.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Harding S, Britten N, Bristow D. The performance of junior doctors in applying clinical pharmacology knowledge and prescribing skills to standardized clinical cases. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:598–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03645.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tully M, Ashcroft DM, Dornan T, Lewis PJ, Taylor D, Wass V. The causes of and factors associated with prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009;32:819–836. doi: 10.2165/11316560-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewis PJ, Dornan T, Taylor D, Tully MP, Wass V, Ashcroft DM. Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2009;32:379–389. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932050-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N. Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359:1373–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08350-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:585–600. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3135–3139. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Visser BJ, Bouman J. There's a medical app for that. Stud BMJ. 2012;20:e2162. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosser BA, Eccleston C. Smartphone applications for pain management. J Telecare Telemed. 2011;17:308–312. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Visvanathan A, Hamilton A, Brady RRW. Smartphone apps in microbiolology-is better regulation required? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:e218–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Franko OI. Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2042–2048. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamilton AD, Brady RR. Medical professional involvement in smartphone apps in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:220–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.O'Neill S, Brady RRW. Colorectal apps; opportunities and risks. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:e530–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Flannigan C, McAloon J. Students prescribing emergency drug infusions utilising smartphones outperformed consultants using the BNFCs. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1424–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chang AY, Ghose S, Littman-Quinn R, Anolik RB, Kyer A, Mazhani L, Seymour AK, Kovarik CL. Use of mobile learning by resident physicians in Botswana. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:1–3. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zolfo M, Iglesias D, Kiyan C, Echevarria J, Fucay L, Llacsahuanga E, de Waard I, Suàrez V, Llaque WC, Lynen L. Mobile learning for HIV/AIDS healthcare worker training in resource-limited settings. AIDS Res Ther. 2010;7:35. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-7-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Outcomes of the Medical Schools Council Safe Prescribing Working Group. Medical Schools Council. 11/02/2008. Available at http://www.medschools.ac.uk/AboutUs/Projects/Documents/Outcomes%20of%20the%20Medical%20Schools%20Council%20Safe%20Prescribing%20Working%20Group.pdf (last accessed 4 February 2013)
- 20.NHS Hack Day. 2012. Available at http://nhshackday.com/ (last accessed 4 February 2013)
- 21.Department of Health. GPs to prescribe apps for patient [Internet]/ 2012 Feb 22. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/02/apps/ (last accessed 4 February 2013)
- 22.Buijink AWG, Visser BJ, Marshall L. Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med. 2012 doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-100885. doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-100885 (Published Online First: 25 August 2012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haffey F, Brady RRW, Maxwell S. A comparison of the reliability of smartphone apps for opioid conversion. Drug Saf. 2013;36:111–117. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.happtique.com [Internet] Happtique™. Available at http://www.happtique.com/ (last accessed 4 February 2013)
- 25.Medical App Journal [Internet] Available at http://medicalappjournal.com/inner.php?id=1 (last accessed 4 February 2013)