Abstract
Background and Objective
Due to contagiousness of pertussis, a rapid and sensitive method for diagnosis is required to initiate the treatment and interrupt its transmission.
Materials and Methods
To detect B. pertussis strains, we used two real-time PCR targeting IS481 and BP283 sequences and compared factors influencing culture and real-time PCR results.
Results
Totally, 779 specimens were collected from patients among which 11 (1.4%) were culture positive. Using IS481 and BP283 primers, 122 (15.6%) and 100 (12.8%) were diagnosed as infected specimens respectively. There were significant relationships between the real-time PCR method for diagnosis of B. pertussis and age, sex and vaccination of patients before sampling.
Conclusion
The real-time PCR is superior and much more sensitive than culture for diagnosis of B. pertussis. However, the sensitivity was improved when both IS481 and BP283 were used. Correct sampling and transportation of specimen also improved the detection rate in our research.
Keywords: Bordetella pertussis, real-time PCR, IS481, BP283
INTRODUCTION
Whooping cough (pertussis) caused by Bordetella pertussis is a hazardous respiratory illness mostly among infants (1–3). Despite decreasing the incidence of this disease by extensive vaccination around the world, pertussis has been re-emerged especially in those under 5 months old and also over 10 years in the last decade (2, 4–9). This may be due to several factors including adaptation of vaccine-induced immunity among the B. pertussis strains (strain polymorphism), waning vaccine induced immunity, incomplete protection from vaccination and expansion of strains that are antigenetically distinct from vaccine strains (5, 10–14). Moreover, changes in case definition and improvement in diagnosis and reporting may result in higher incidences of pertussis infections (2, 12).
Due to the importance of pertussis as a contagious disease, it is necessary to utilize a rapid and sensitive detection of B. pertussis to interrupt its transmission (15–18). Real-time PCR, using insertion sequence IS481, is the most common molecular method for the rapid detection of B. pertussis (4, 16, 19–21). The genome of B. pertussis contains high copy number of this insertion element (22), however, IS481 element has also been found in B. holmessi and some strains of B. bronchiseptica (23, 24)
Therefore, this target may make some false positive results and is not very specific target in laboratory diagnosis of B. pertussis. However, lack of specificity of this target has led the researches to alter other sequences such as pertactin gene (25), promoter of pertussis toxin gene (ptx-Pr) (21, 26, 27), porine gene (28, 29), single copy PCR target BP3385 (30), BP283 and BP485 (31), as a means of confirming IS481 for the detection of B. pertussis in clinical samples.
As these sequences have only one copy in B. pertussis genome, these target sequences can be used in combination with IS481 to improve the accuracy of B. pertussis detection for laboratory diagnosis (31).
There is no sufficient information about incidence of B. pertussis infection in our country. In this study we used IS481 and BP283 targets in real-time PCR for detection of clinical B. pertussis strains isolated from patients and compared factors that influence culture and real-time PCR for detection of this bacterium in clinical samples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimen collection
A total of 779 specimens (two dacron-tipped swabs per specimens) were collected from pertussis suspected patients and transported in Regan-Lowe transport medium to the Pertussis Reference Laboratory at the Pasteur Institute of Iran during May 2009 to December 2010. One swab was cultured and streaked on to fresh Bordet Gengou medium and Regan-Lowe medium (provided from Difco Laboratories) containing 10% defibrinated horse blood with and without cephalexin (40µg/ml) (Sigma Chemical Co., USA). After sufficient incubation of the isolates at 35°C for up to 10 days in a humid atmosphere, suspected Gram negative coccobacilli, non motile, catalase and oxidase positive colonies selected for further confirmation tests. Then API 20E System used for biochemical test and specific slide agglutination reaction with B. pertussis antiserum performed to confirm B. pertussis strains (Difco Laboratories) (32, 33).
DNA extraction
The other swab was subjected for DNA extraction of the isolates in order to obtain DNA templates for real-time PCR. Nucleic acid of the isolates was extracted using high pure PCR template purification kit according to the manufacturer instruction (Roche Applied Science).
Real-time PCR
Taqman PCR assay was performed based on IS481 target and confirmed by BP283 target [GeneBank accession number BX470248] (16, 31), in Applied Biosystems 7500 instrument using the thermal program of 15 min at 95°C followed by 50 cycles of 30s at 95°C, 30s at 55°C. In order to confirm PCR performance without any inhibitors in master mix amplification of the human GAPDH gene in each run used for internal control (IC). The PCR was performed in a total volume of 30 µl containing 1X master mix (Roche Applied Science), 7.5 µM of each primers and probe (Table 1) and 5µl of extracted DNA that finalize PCR combination.
Table 1.
PCR target | Forward primer (5'–3') | Reverse primer (5'–3') | Probe (5'–3') |
---|---|---|---|
IS481 | ATCAAGCACCGCTTTACCC | CACACCTACCAGAACTCCCAA | FAM-AATGGCAAGCCGAACGCTTCA-TAMRA |
Bp283 | CAGGCACAGCACGTATTGCG | GACGATTACCAGCGAGATTACGA | FAM-CCGCCATCGCAACCGTCGCATTCA-TAMRA |
IC | CCACTCCTCCACCTTTGA C | ACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCA | VIC-TTGCCCTCAACGACCACTTTGTC-TAMRA |
We also examined the specificity of target BP283 using Bordetella parapertussis ATCC 15311 and non-Bordetella strains such as E. coli ATCC 35218, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 9997, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 10211, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615 and Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of some variables for detection of B. pertussis by real-time PCR (using BP283 target) including age (grouped as ≤2, 2–10, ≥ 10 years), gender, antibiotic treatment of patients, vaccination and cough symptoms in patients was performed via the Chi-square test.
RESULTS
In this research 11out of 779 specimens (1.4%) were culture positive and 122 (15.6%) and 100 (12.8%) were diagnosed as infected using real-time PCR with IS481 and BP283 target primers, respectively.
All strains of B. pertussis recovered by culture were also positive by real-time PCR using both IS481 and BP283 (sensitivity 100%) (Table 2). Nine isolates of culture positive (81%) and 79 PCR positive specimens using BP283 (89%) were isolated from patients with 2 years old or younger. The results for B. parapertussis and other species of bacteria were negative using BP283 target.
Table 2.
Assay | Positives No (%) | Sensitivity% |
---|---|---|
Culture | 11 (1.4) | Not applicable |
PCR (IS 481 ) | 122 (15.6) | 100 |
PCR (BP283) | 100 (12.8) | 100 |
We have several type of errors in sample collection including using cotton swabs instead of dacron swabs, antibiotic treatment of patients before sampling, sending the samples in time longer than 72 hours to laboratory, specimens delivered in unsuitable or expired transport medium (data not shown) (3, 32). Although, dacron and rayon swabs are an excellent choice for both PCR and culture for detection of B. pertussis, one of 11 isolates of B. pertussis that recovered in culture in this research was from a sample that was collected by use of cotton swab.
The results of statistical analysis showed that there were significant relationships between the results obtained from real-time PCR method and age, sex, and vaccination of patients before sampling (P < 0.05). Such relationship was not observed when culture was used.
DISCUSSION
In spite of high specificity of culture for diagnosis of B. pertussis, low sensitivity of this method has led the researcher to use molecular method. The positive results based on IS481 sequence (a multiple copy target) in PCR might be regarded as evidence for the infection caused by Bordetella spp., however, IS481 was found in both B. pertussis and B. holmesii genome (16, 31). This target has also been identified in some strains of B. bronchiseptica (23, 34). However, B. holmesii has infrequently been isolated from nasopharyngeal samples (35, 36). Therefore, to ensure high specificity, use of more than one target in PCR assay has been suggested (37, 38).
Previous studies have shown that promoter of pertussis toxin and a porin gene were specific in B. pertussis (28, 29, 39). In 2008, Probert et al also introduced two BP283 and BP485 genes as being specific for B. pertussis (31). Out of total pertussis suspected specimens sent to the Pertussis Reference Laboratory of Pasteur Institute of Iran (n = 779) during thirty months of study, the rate of B. pertussis diagnosed by culture was 1.4% (Table 2). However, the rate of Real Time PCR positive cases in our research was 12.8% (based on BP283 target). Other studies in Germany and Denmark indicated similar rate of 13% and 15%, respectively (15, 16).
Like previous studies our results showed that real-time PCR is superior and much more sensitive than culture for diagnosis of B. pertussis (Table 2) (28, 37, 40). The number of cases diagnosed by using BP283 target (n = 100) in this study was almost nine times higher than those diagnosed by culture (n = 11). However, difference between culture and PCR positive strains in our study is higher than other investigations (2, 15, 21, 31). The probable reasons for this difference might be due to the time and techniques of sampling and delay between sampling and laboratory testing (15).
Our study showed that out of 122 total PCR positive samples examined by IS481 target, 100 samples were positive using confirmative primers BP283 as well. Serial 10-fold dilutions of B. pertussis suspension were used to determine the limit of detection for each assay. Following nucleic acid extraction and real-time PCR, the limits of detection for the IS481 and BP283 assays were 1.0, 0.1 CFU/reaction, respectively. Multiple copies of the IS481 target sequence in the B. pertussis genome cause lower detection limit compared to BP283. Negative results with primers of single copy sequence BP283 (n = 22) is probably due to either very low amounts of DNA template in PCR master mix (Ct values ≤ 32 by the IS481 assay) or presence of another species of Bordetella (31). This demonstrated that it was necessary to use more than one PCR target to ensure diagnosis of B. pertussis strains.
Statistical analysis of data showed that some factors have a significant effect on the rate of pertussis obtained by real-time PCR (P < 0.05). As shown in Table 3, treatment initiation is not considered as important inhibitors for the diagnosis of pertussis (P > 0.05). It may be due to some factors such as insufficient antibiotic treatment, specimen collection just after starting treatment or antibiotics resistance of the studied isolates.
Table 3.
Variables | No. (% in total specimens) | PCR positive (BP283) | Culture positive | |
---|---|---|---|---|
age | ≤2 years | 510 (65.5) | 79 | 9 |
2 <age ≤ 10 years | 147 (18.8) | 10 | 1 | |
>10 years | 84 (10.7) | 6 | 1 | |
antibiotic treatment | yes | 583 (74.8) | 74 | 7 |
no | 113 (14.5) | 17 | 3 | |
Gender | Female | 364 (46.7) | 35 | 4 |
Male | 415 (53.3) | 65 | 7 | |
Vaccination | yes | 568 (72.9) | 63 | 7 |
no | 138 (17.7) | 27 | 3 |
In our study, the majority of PCR positive results and culture positive specimens were collected from young patients. Previous studies have shown that real-time PCR can be used to diagnose pertussis especially in infants less than 6 month of age (15). Although B. pertussis causes pertussis in adults and adolescent in some countries (2, 3, 41), this illness has still been seen significantly among children younger than 2 years of age with uncompleted vaccination in Iran (P < 0.05). The results obtained by Nakamura et al clearly indicate that adults had very low B. pertussis DNA loads in their nasopharyngeal swabs compared to infants and children. Antibiotic treatment and vaccination in adults support this hypothesis (42).
According to our results, vaccination has a significant effect on the rate of pertussis obtained from real-time PCR assay (P < 0.05). Our data showed that patients with no vaccination (19.5%) are more exposed to illness than patients who were immunized (11%). There was also a significant relationship between the results of the real-time PCR assay and gender of patients, males being more likely to be B. pertussis positive in our study (P < 0.05). In contrast, others have reported an opposite results (15).
In spite of importance of pertussis, lack of access to diagnostic methods, misdiagnosis, under reporting and differences in case definition between countries may result in false incidence of pertussis in both developed and less developed countries. The true number probably is higher than the number is reported from these countries (43, 44).
Based on pertussis incidence data from Center of Disease Control (CDC) in Iran, the incidence rate of pertussis was 1.2 cases per 100,000 populations and 1 case per 100,000 populations in 2008 and 2009, respectively (unpublished data form CDC of Iran). It seems that lack of enough awareness of correct sampling and accurate specimen transport to the laboratory is the main reason for great difference between the positive results obtained from two methods of detection (culture and real-time PCR) in our research. In addition, laboratory diagnosis methods such as culture and PCR are limited to certain laboratories in Iran.
Improvement in surveillance and disease control programs and increase in clinician awareness and reporting practices can be useful to estimate more accurate rates of pertussis in our country.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank Hassam Shafiei, Fahimeh Shooraj and Reza Azizian for their assistance in this research. We also acknowledge Dr. Ehsan Mostafavi for his help in statistical analysis of our data and Dr. Ali Nojoumi for reading the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tozzi AE, Celentan LP, Ciofi degli Atti ML, Salmaso S. Diagnosis and management of pertussis. CMAJ. 2005;172:509–515. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wood N, McIntyre P. Pertussis: review of epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prevention. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2008;9:201–212. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.World Health Organization (WHO) 2007. Laboratory manual for the diagnosis of whooping cough caused by Bordetella pertussis/Bordetella parapertussis . [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bidet P, Liguori S, de Lauzanne A, Caro V, Lorrot M, Carol A, et al. Real-time PCR measurement of persistence of Bordetella pertussis DNA in nasopharyngeal secretions during antibiotic treatment of young children with pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3636–3638. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01308-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Melker HE, Conyn-van Spaendonck MA, Rumke HC, van Wijngaarden JK, Mooi FR, et al. Pertussis in The Netherlands: anoutbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:175–178. doi: 10.3201/eid0302.970211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Elomaa A, Advani A, Donnelly D, Antila M, Mertsola J, He Q, et al. Population dynamics of Bordetella pertussis in Finland and Sweden, neighbouring countries with different vaccination histories. Vaccine. 2007;25:918–26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Elomaa A, Advani A, Donnelly D, Antila M, Mertsola J, Hallander H, et al. Strain variation among Bordetella pertussis isolates in Finland where the whole-cell pertussis vaccine has been used for 50 years. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3681–3687. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3681-3687.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Poynten M, McIntyre PB, Mooi FR, Heuvelman KJ, Gilbert GL. Temporal trends in circulating Bordetella pertussis strains in Australia. Epidemiol Infect. 2004;132:185–193. doi: 10.1017/s095026880300164x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Weber C, Boursaux-Eude C, Coralie G, Caro V, Guiso N. Polymorphism of Bordetella pertussis isolates circulating for the last 10 years in France, where a single effective whole-cell vaccine has been used for more than 30 years. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4396–403. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4396-4403.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bass JW, Stephenson SR. The return of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987;6:141–144. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198702000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He Q, Mäkinen J, Berbers G, Mooi FR, Viljanen MK, Arvilommi H, et al. Bordetella pertussis protein pertactin induces type-specific antibodies: one possible explanation for the emergence of antigenic variants? J Infect Dis. 2003;187:1200–1205. doi: 10.1086/368412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mooi FR, van Oirschot H, Heuvelman K, van der Heide HG, Gaastra W, Willems RJ. Polymorphism in the Bordetella pertussis virulence factors P.69/pertactin and pertussis toxin in The Netherlands: temporal trends and evidence for vaccine-driven evolution. Infect Immun. 1998;66:670–675. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.2.670-675.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ochman H.A, Wilson C. Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes. J Mol Evol. 1987;6:74–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02111283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Willems RJL, Mooi FR. From whole cell to acellular vaccines. Rev Med Microbiol. 1996;7:13–21. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dragsted DM, Dohn B, Madsen J, Jensen JS. Comparison of culture and PCR for detection of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis under routine laboratory conditions. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:749–754. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45585-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kösters K, Riffelmann M, von König CHW. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella. parapertussis in clinical samples. J Med Microbiol. 2001;50:436–440. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-5-436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kösters K, Reischl U, Schmetz J, Riffelmann M, von König CHW. Real-Time Light Cycler PCR for Detection and Discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis . J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1719–1722. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1719-1722.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Loe elholz M.J, Thompson CJ, Long KS, Gil-christ MJ. Comparison of PCR, culture, and direct fluorescent-antibody testing for detection of Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2872–2876. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.9.2872-2876.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antila M, He Q, de Jong C, Aarts I, Verbakel H, Bruisten S, et al. Bordetella holmesii DNA is not detected in nasopharyngeal swabs from Finnish and Dutch patients with suspected pertussis. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:1043–1051. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Koidi C, Bozic M, Burmeister A, Hess M, Marth E, Kessler HH. Detection and Differentiation of Bordetella spp. by Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:347–350. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01303-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu Y, Xu Y, Hou Q, Yang R, Zhang S. Triplex real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis . A P M I S. 2010;118:685–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parkhill J, Sebaihia M, Preston A, Murphy LD, Thomson N, Harris DE, et al. Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica . Nat Genet. 2003;35:32–40. doi: 10.1038/ng1227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Register KB, Sanden GN. Prevalence and sequence variants of IS481 in Bordetella bronchiseptica: implication for IS481-based detection of Bordetella pertussis . J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4577–4583. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01295-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reischl U, Lehn N, Sanden GN, Loeffelholz MJ. Real-time PCR assay targeting IS481 of Bordetella pertussis and molecular basis for detecting Bordetella holmesii . J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1963–1966. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1963-1966.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vincart B, de Mendonça R, Rottiers S, Vermeulen F, Struelens MJ, Denis O. A specific real-time PCR assay for the detection of Bordetella pertussis . J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:918–920. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46947-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fry NK, Tzivra O, Li YT, McNiff A, Doshi N, Maple PA, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of pertussis infections: the role of PCR and serology. J Med Microbiol. 2004;53:519–525. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45624-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muyldermans G, Soetens O, Antoine M, Bruisten S, Vincart B, Doucet K, et al. External quality assessment for molecular detection of Bordetella pertussis in European laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:30–35. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.30-35.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Furuya D, Yagihashi A, Endoh T, Uehara N, Fujii N, Chiba S, et al. Simultaneous amplification of Bordetella repeated insertion sequences and toxin promoter region gene by polymerase chain reaction. Immunopharmocol Immunotoxicol. 1999;21:55–63. doi: 10.3109/08923979909016394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Matthews RC, Golbang N, Bruck WM, Owen D, Bailey A, Weston V, et al. Semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of pertussis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:748–750. doi: 10.1007/s100960050392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guthrie JL, Seah C, Brown S, Tang P, Jamieson F, Drews SJ. Use of Bordetella pertussis BP3385 to establish a cutoff value for an IS481-targeted real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3798–3799. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01551-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Probert WS, Ely J, Schrader K, Atwell J, Nossoff A, Kwan S. Identification and Evaluation of New Target Sequences for Specific Detection of Bordetella pertussis by Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3228–3231. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00386-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McGowan KL. Bordetella cultures. In: Isenberg H. D, editor. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 2004. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koneman EW. Koneman's color Atlas and Textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 34.van der Zee A, Mooi F, Van Embden J, Musser J. Molecular evolution and host adaptation of Bordetella spp.: phylogenetic analysis using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and typing with three insertion sequences. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6609–6617. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.21.6609-6617.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mazengia E, Silva EA, Peppe JA, Timperi R, George H. Recovery of Bordetella holmesii from patients with pertussis-like symptoms: use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to characterize circulating strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2330–2333. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.6.2330-2333.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yih WK, Silva EA, Ida J, Harrington N, Lett SM, George H. Bordetella holmesii-like organisms isolated from Massachusetts patients with pertussis-like symptoms. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:441–443. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knorr L, Fox JD, Tilley PA, Ahmed-Bentley J. Evaluation of real-time PCR for diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:62–67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Qin X, Galanakis E, Martin ET, Englund JA. Multitarget PCR for diagnosis of pertussis and itsclinical implications. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:506–511. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02042-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Farrell DJ, McKeon M, Daggard G, Loeffelholz MJ, Thompson CJ, Mukkur TKS. Rapid-cycle PCR method to detect Bordetella pertussis that fulfills all consensus recommendations for use of PCR in diagnosis of pertussis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4499–4502. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.12.4499-4502.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fry NK, Duncan J, Wagner K, Tzivra O, Doshi N, Litt DJ, et al. Role of PCR in the diagnosis of pertussis infection in infants: 5 years’ experience of provision of a same-day real-time PCR service in England and Wales from 2002 to 2007. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58:1023–1029. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.009878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cimolai N, Trombley C, O'Neill D. Diagnosis of whooping cough: a new era with rapid molecular diagnostics. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1996;12:91–93. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199604000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nakamura Y, Kamachi K, Toyoizumi-Ajisaka H, Otsuka N, Saito R, Tsuruoka J, et al. Marked difference between adults and children in Bordetella pertussis DNA load in nasopharyngeal swabs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:365–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Crowcroft N, Stein C, Duclos P, Birmingham M. How best to estimate the global burden of pertussis? Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:413–418. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00669-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Forsyth K, Campins-Marti M, Caro J, Cherry JD, Greenberg D, Guiso N, et al. New pertussis vaccination strategies beyond infancy: recommendations by the global pertussis initiative. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:1802–1809. doi: 10.1086/426020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]