Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Microbiology
. 2013 Sep;5(3):227–232.

Isolation of Asian endemic and livestock associated clones of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from ocular samples in Northeastern Iran

Seyed Asghar Havaei 1, Amir Azimian 2,*, Hosein Fazeli 1, Mahmood Naderi 3, Kiarash Ghazvini 4, Siamak Mirab Samiee 5, Masoud Soleimani 6
PMCID: PMC3895559  PMID: 24475328

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are divided into Community Associated (CA-) and Hospital Associated (HA-) MRSA. These strains vary in antimicrobial resistance and pathogenicity. S. aureus is one of the most common microorganisms in ocular infections. This study was aimed to determine antimicrobial resistance patterns and genetic characteristics of MRSA strains isolated from ocular infections in Iran.

Material and Methods

Out of 171 S. aureus strains isolated from various clinical samples during September-December 2011 at Mashhad Emam Reza Hospital, 3 were cultured from eye discharge samples. Antimicrobial resistance tests were performed with MIC and disk diffusion methods and also genetic evaluation was done with Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec), Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) and Staphylococcal Protein A (spa) typing, Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) and determination of toxin gene profile.

Results

All strains were MRSA and showed resistance to tetracycline, gentamicin and clindamycin too. Vancomycin, minocyclin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were effective on all ocular isolates. All isolates belonged to SCCmec IV type. MRSA1 belonged to ST239, CC8, Spa type t7688 and agrIII and had tst1 and hla toxin genes. MRSA2 belonged to ST239, CC8, Spa type t037 and agrI and had the hla toxin gene. Finally, MRSA3 belonged to ST291, CC398, Spa type t304, and agrI and had pvl and hla toxin genes.

Conclusion

Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of the isolated MRSA strains revealed that these strains belong to endemic Asian and livestock related clones that could reach from other body sites or environment to the eye of patients and developed ocular infection.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, MLST, Spa typing, SCCmec type, agr, ocular infection

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major human pathogens causing a wide variety of infections from simple superficial skin infections to dangerous systemic infections such as septicemia, endocarditis and toxic shock syndrome (1, 2). S. aureus is the major ophthalmic bacterial pathogen isolated from various ocular infections such as conjunctivitis, blepharitis, external and internal hordeolum, scleritis, canaliculitis, keratitis (3, 4).

The eye is impermeable to external materials. In addition, some enzymes and immunomodulatory proteins such as lysozyme, lactoferrin, secretory immunoglobulins, and defensins are present in tear and reduce bacterial colonization in the ocular surfaces (5). Infections can originate from external sources or intraocular invasion of blood borne microorganisms. Bacterial infections on the outer surface of eye may spread to adjacent tissues such as the cornea, orbit, inner eye and even the brain (6). Major risk factors for bacterial ocular infections with external sources are surgical and non-surgical trauma and contact lens use. Ocular infections with progressive lesions can lead to blindness due to destructive activity of bacterial enzymes and toxins or even in some cases lead to mortality due to expansion of infection to other organs via the blood stream or the lymphatics (6, 7).

Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections has become more complicated with emergence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain in 1961 (8, 9). MRSA was primarily a hospital-associated pathogen, however today multiple community acquired MRSA clones emerged in human infections. Recently, human-related MRSA infections based on their source, have been categorized into four groups; Hospital Associated MRSA (HA-MRSA), Community Associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), Hospital Associated MRSA with Community onset and Livestock Associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) (10). To date, all four types of MRSA strains have been isolated from clinical samples (1015). HA-MRSA strains have more antimicrobial resistance and also cause more serious diseases mainly in hospitalized patients while CA-MRSA strains show less antimicrobial resistance and commonly lead to skin and soft tissue (SSI) infections (1).

Despite the fact that MRSA is one of the major topics in clinical microbiology research, very little is known about the occurrence and genetic characteristics of MRSA strains isolated from ocular infections in the world especially in Asian countries such as Iran. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report concerning the genetic characteristics of MRSA strains causing ocular infections in Iran. Here, we evaluated the genetic characteristics of three MRSAs isolated from ocular discharge samples of patients admitted to the Emam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

171 Strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from patients admitted between 23 September 2011 to 21 December 2011 at Emam Reza Hospital, a 918 bed University teaching Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. These isolates were obtained from blood, urine, sputum, wound, abscess, nose, throat, eye and respiratory tract samples. S. aureus isolates were identified by conventional biochemical tests including Gram staining, catalase, manitol fermentation, slide and tube coagulase test and DNase.

Screening for methicillin and vancomycin resistance

All S. aureus isolates were screened for oxacillin and vancomycin resistance using agar screening method. Methicillin resistance was defined as the capability of growth in agar screening media including 4% NaCl plus 6µg/ml oxacillin and MIC ≥4 µg/ml whereas vancomycin resistance was defined as the capability of growth in agar screening media including 6 µg/ml vancomycin and MIC ≥16 µg/ml. Strains of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 52199 were used as control.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out using disk diffusion method (MAST DISKS™) according to guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)(16, 17). The list of the antibiotics used in the test is presented in Table 2. Strain of S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as control. E-Test method (Biomeriux Strips) was used for MIC determination for the only S. aureus strain capable of growing in the agar screening media.

Table 2.

Genetic characteristics of VISA isolates.

agr Scc mec pvl hla etc tst1 mecA vanA spa type spa repeat profile ST CC MLST allelic profile
MRSA1 III IV - + - + + - t7688 11-148-21-17-34-24-34-22-25 ST-239 8 2-3-1-1-4-4-3
MRSA2 I IV - + - - + - t037 15-12-16-02-25-17-24 ST-239 8 2-3-1-1-4-4-3
MRSA3 I IV + + - - + - t304 11-10-21-17-34-24-34-22-25 ST-291 398 3-37-19-2-20-26-32

Abbreviations: pvl: Panton-ValentinLeukocidin, sec: Enterotoxin C, tst1: Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin1, hla: alpha Hemolysin, agr: accessory gene regulator, SCCmec: Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome,spa: Staphylococcal protein A

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA of S. aureus isolates were extracted using QIAamp® DNA mini kit. According to manufacturer's protocol for bacterial cells, we added lysostaphin at the final concentration of 30µg/ml in lysis buffer.

PCR

PCR amplification was performed with a TAKARA Gradient PCR TP600 thermal cycler in a volume of 50µl. We used EmeraldAmp® MAX PCR Master Mix (Takara, Japan) for all PCR reactions.

PCR identification of mecA gene

The primers used for amplification of mecA gene are listed in Table 3. PCR was performed with the following thermal setting: 5 min at 94°C for initial enzyme activation followed by 40 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec; annealing at 57°C for 45 sec; extension at 72°C for 30 sec) and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Table 3.

Primers used in this study.

Target primer Sequence (5’-3’) Product size (bp) reference
mecA F
R
AGAAGATGGTATGTGGAAGTTAG
ATGTATGTGCGATTGTATTGC
583
pvl F
R
GGAAACATTTATTCTGGCTATAC
CTGGATTGAAGTTACCTCTGG
502
hla F
R
CGGTACTACAGATATTGGAAGC
TGGTAATCATCACGAACTCG
744 (24)
sec F
R
GGGAATGTTGGATGAAGG
AGGCAAGCACCGAAGTAC
900
tst1 F
R
TTATCGTAAGCCCTTTGTTG
TAAAGGTAGTTCTATTGGAGTAGG
398
agr Pan F
R I
R II
R III
R IV
ATGCACATGGTGCACATGC
GTCACAAGTACTATAAGCTGCGAT
GTATTACTAATTGAAAAGTGCCATAGC
CTGTTGAAAAAGTCAACTAAAAGCTC
CGATAATGCCGTAATACCCG
439
572
406
657
(27)
SCCmec F β
R α3
F ccrC
R ccrC
F 1272
R 1272
F 5RmecA
R 5R431
ATTGCCTTGATAATAGCCYTCT
TAAAGGCATCAATGCACAAACACT
CGTCTATTACAAGATGTTAAGGATAAT
CCTTTATAGACTGGATTATTCAAAATAT
GCCACTCATAACATATGGAA
CATCCGAGTGAAACCCAAA
TATACCAAACCCGACAACTAC
CGGCTACAGTGATAACATCC

937

518

415

359
(19)

Multiplex PCR for detection of toxin genes

The primers used for amplification of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (pvl), Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1 (tst1), alpha Hemolysin (hla) and Enterotoxin C (etc) genes are listed in Table 3. PCR was performed with the following thermal setting: 5 min at 94°C for initial enzyme activation followed by 40 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 40 sec; annealing at 60°C for 40 sec; extension at 72°C for 1 min) and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Multiplex PCR for detection of toxin genes

The primers used for amplification of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (pvl), Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin-1 (tst1), alpha Hemolysin (hla) and Enterotoxin C (etc) genes are listed in Table 3. PCR was performed with the following thermal setting: 5 min at 94°C for initial enzyme activation followed by 40 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94°C for 40 sec; annealing at 60°C for 40 sec; extension at 72°C for 1 min) and final extension at 72°C for 5 min

Multiplex PCR for SCCmec and agr typing

SCCmec and agr typing were performed as previously described (18, 19). The primers used for the PCR are listed in Table 3.

MLST

Multi Locus Sequence Typing was carried out by PCR and sequencing of the internal fragments of carbamate kinase (arc), shikimate dehydrogenase (aro), glycerol kinase (glp),guanylate kinase (gmk), phosphate acetyl transferase (pta), trios phosphate isomerase (tpi) and acetyl coenzyme A acetyl transferase (yqi) genes of S. aureus as previously described (20).

Spa typing

spa typing was performed by PCR and sequencing of polymorphic X region of spa gene was done as previously described, http://spaserver.ridom.de/(21).

Nucleotide Sequencing

Amplified PCR products were purified with QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit. The purified PCR products were sequenced with an ABI 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) in both directions. The sequences were used for both confirmation and sequence based typing methods (MLST and spa typing).

RESULTS

Of 171 S. aureus isolates 3 were isolated from eye discharge. These 3 isolates were resistant to oxacillin, positive for mecA gene and showed SCCmec type IV. They belonged to Clonal Complexes 8 and 398 (CC8 and CC398). Genetic analysis of the isolated MRSA strains revealed that these strains were endemic Asian and livestock related clones. All three isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, minocycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole but resistant to oxacillin, tetracycline, gentamycin and clindamycin. The demographic data and antibiogram results of these strains are listed in Table 1. Genetic evaluation results in details including, mecA gene PCR, SCCmec types, agr groups, toxin profiles, spa types and Sequence Types (STs) are presented in Table 2.

Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics of VISA isolates.

Sex/ age Sample/ ward Oxa Van Min Lev Cip Tet Cot Gen Cli Rif Oxa MIC Van MIC Van Agar screen
MRSA1 F/25 Eye discharge/ out patient R S S R R R S R R S 128 2 -
MRSA2 F/39 Eye discharge/ out patient R S S R R R S R R S 128 1 -
MRSA3 F/50 Eye discharge / neurology R S S S S R S R R R 256 1 -

Abbreviations: Oxa: Oxacillin, Van: Vancomycin, Min: Minocyclin, Lev: Levofloxacin, Cip: Ciprofloxacin, Tet: Tetracycline, Cot: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, Gen: Gentamycin, Cli: Clindamycin, Rif: Rifampicin. R: Resistant, S: Susceptible.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report of the molecular analysis of three S. aureus strains isolated from ocular infections with different molecular typing methods in Iran. In addition, SCCmec types of both isolated MRSA were type IV. With regard to these data, isolated strains can be categorized to CA-MRSA. The third MRSA was isolated from a hospitalized patient who had a history of hospitalization. Given this information, this infection could be categorized into the Hospital associated group, however, the isolate showed SCCmec type IV and belonged to ST291 (CC398) and therefore can be placed in the LA-MRSA group. We concluded that this isolate was a livestock associated strain that either entered the hospital environment or colonized the patient before hospitalization. We don't know about the patient contact with livestock or animals.

Nadig et al. (2012) reported that most of the eye infections in two important Eye Specialist Hospital in India were caused by community-associated S. aureus. They also reported that major Sequence Type in their isolates was ST722 (belonged to Clonal Complex 1) whereas in our study isolated strains were belonged to endemic Asian and also livestock associated clones (10). The livestock associated isolate in our study epidemiologically was HA-MRSA. Currently, MRSA isolates belonging to CC398, such as ST398 or ST291 (Double Locus Variant of ST398) are newly categorized to LA-MRSA (10). There are some reports relating human infections, caused by Livestock associated Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), to LA-MRSA (1315). To our knowledge, this is the first report of human ocular infection with LA-MRSA. Mediavilla et al. reported that most of CC398 strains isolated from Clinical samples in the USA, mainly belonged to Spa type t2313 which is endemic to Europe, while our LA-MRSA isolate had Spa type t304 that has been isolated from different parts of the world (13, 22).

The MRSA1 strain belonged to Spa type t7688 and MRSA2 to Spa type t037. To date, Spa type t7688 has been reported for the first time from Iran (http://spa.ridom.de/spa-t7688.shtml) and t037 is one of the common Spa types in Asian countries (23, 24). Hesje et al. reported that the most observed Spa types in their study in the USA were Spa types t008 and t002 that belonged to USA300 and USA100 clones, respectively (25).

Other important genetic characteristic of these isolates is agr specific group. The agr locus of S. aureus is a quorum-sensing gene cluster that up-regulates the production of secreted virulence factors and down-regulates the production of cell-associated virulence factors. The relation between agr group, type of infection, geographical area and resistance to some antibiotics, particularly vancomycin, is highlighted in some articles (18, 26). MRSA1 belonged to agrIII and MRSA2 & 3 belonged to agrI, that is the most common agr group among worldwide MRSA clones (27).

Some reports have been published concerning the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of MRSA strains isolated from clinical specimens including ocular samples (57, 2832). Shanmuganathan et al. reported that all MRSA strains, isolated from external ocular infections, were sensitive to chloramphenicol and those isolated from patients more than 50 years old, all were resistant to ofloxacin (28). Hsiao et al. reported that CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA isolates were resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin and CA-MRSA isolates were more susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (30). All MRSA strains in this study were resistant to tetracycline, gentamicin and clindamycin. In contrast, vancomycin, minocyclin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim showed activity against all of the isolated MRSA strains (Table 2).

Epidemiological studies show that combination of pvl and other toxins such as entero-toxins, could increase the severity of diseases caused by S. aureus (6). We evaluated pvl, tst1, etc and hla genes amongst the MRSA isolate (Table 1). All isolates were positive for hla gene and negative for etc gene. hla gene commonly found in most isolated S. aureus strains (33). MRSA1 was also positive for tst1 in PCR and MRSA3 isolate was positive for pvl gene, but unfortunately we do not have any data about the outcome of these infections in our patients, because they were not available for more questioning.

A major limitation in this study was the small number of isolates. It was better that we simultaneously evaluated the nasal swab and eye samples. This approach helped us to find probable source of ocular infection in the patients. An interesting finding of the ocular specimens in this study was the gender of patients: all samples were obtained from female patients. However, due to small sample size it is not possible to make conclusion about this finding.

Funding

This work was supported bythe Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [Grant number 390256].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We specifically thank Dr. Jean B. Patel from Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control for her scientific advice. Also, we thank Stem Cell Research Center (Bone Yakhteh) for supporting technical assistance. We deeply thank Prof. Richard P. Novick and Prof. K. Hiramatsu for providing standard strains. We also thank Zahra Masoumi for editing the paper.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chambers HF, DeLeo FR. Waves of Resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the Antibiotic Era. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feng Y, Chen C-J, Su L-H, Hu S, Yu J, Chiu C-H. Evolutionand pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus: lessons learned from genotyping and comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007;32:23–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ramesh S, Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Amuthan M, Viswanathan S. Prevalence of bacterial pathogens causing ocular infections in South India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:281–286. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.64336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Behlau I, Gilmore MS. Microbial Biofilms in Ophthalmology and Infectious Disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1572–1581. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.11.1572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khosravi AD, Mehdinejad M, Heidari M. Bacteriological findings in patients with ocular infection and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of isolated pathogens. Singapore Med J. 2007;48:741–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nadig S, Velusamy N, Lalitha P, Kar S, Sharma S, Arakere G. Staphylococcus aureus eye infections in two Indian hospitals: emergence of ST772 as a major clone. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:165–73. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S23878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chuang C-C, Hsiao C-H, Tan H-Y, Ma DH-K, Lin K-K, Chang C-J, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Ocular Infection: Methicillin-Resistance, Clinical Features, and Antibiotic Susceptibilities. PLoS ONE. 2012;8:e42437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rehm SJ, Tice A. Staphylococcus aureus: Methicillin-Susceptible S. aureus to Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant S. Aureus . Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:S176–S82. doi: 10.1086/653518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sievert DM, Rudrik JT, Patel JB, McDonald LC, Wilkins MJ, Hageman JC. Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2002–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:668–674. doi: 10.1086/527392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, Andersen PS, et al. Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host Adaptation and Emergence of Methicillin Resistance in Livestock. Mbio. 2012;3:1–6. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Herold B, Immergluck L, Maranan M, Lauderdale D, Gaskin R, Boyle-Vavra S, et al. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA. 1998;279:593–598. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Disease in Three Communities. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1436–1444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Uhlemann A-C, Hanson BM, Rosenthal M, Stanak K, et al. Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398, New York and New Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:700–702. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.111419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Graveland H, Wagenaar J. A, Bergs K, Heesterbeek H, Heederik D. Persistence of livestock associated MRSA CC398 in humans is dependent on Intensity of animal contact. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cleef BAGLv, Monnet DL, Voss A, Krziwanek K, Allerberger F, Struelens M, et al. Livestock associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Humans, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:502–505. doi: 10.3201/eid1703.101036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Standard - 11th ed CLSI document M02-A11. CLSI, 950 West Valley Rd., Suite 25002010. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.CLSI. 2010. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. Approved Standard - 11th ed. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peerayeh SN, Azimian A, Nejad QB, Kashi M. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from university hospitals in Tehran. Lab Med. 2009;40:27–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boye K, Bartels M, Andersen I, Møller J, Westh H. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I-V. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:725–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus Sequence Typing for Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Clones of Staphylococcus aureus . J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1008–1015. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1008-1015.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothgänger J, Claus H, Turnwald D, et al. Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a University Hospital Setting by Using Novel Software for spa Repeat Determination and Database Management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5442–5448. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5442-5448.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Emaneini M, Khoramrooz SS, Taherikalani M, Jabalameli F, Aligholi M. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from children with adenoid hypertrophy: Emergence of new spa types t7685 and t7692. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryng. 2011;75:1446–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghaznavi-Rad E, Shamsudin MN, Sekawi Z, Khoon LY, Aziz MN, Hamat RA, et al. Predominance and Emergence of Clones of Hospital-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Malaysia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:867–872. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01112-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Azimian A, Havaei SA, Fazeli H, Naderi M, Ghazvini K, Samiee SM, et al. Genetic characterization of a Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from respiratory tract of a hospitalized patient in a university hospital in Northeastern Iran. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3581–3585. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01727-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hesje CK, Sanfilippo CM, Haas W, Morris TW. Molecular Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from the Eye. Cur Eye Res. 2011;36:94–102. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.534229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Robert C, Moellering J, Wennersten C, Venkataraman L, Novick RP, et al. Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) Locus in Geographically Diverse Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin. Antimicrob Agent Chemother. 2002;46(5):1492–1502. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.5.1492-1502.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Leeuwen Wv, Nieuwenhuizen Wv, Gijzen C, Verbrugh H, Belkum AV. Population studies of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains reveal a lack of variability in the agrD gene, encoding a staphylococcal autoinducer peptide. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:5721–5729. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.20.5721-5729.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shanmuganathan V, Armstrong M, Buller A, Tullo A. External ocular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Eye. 2005;19:284–291. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schubert TL, Hume EB, Willcox MD. Staphylococcus aureus ocular isolates from symptomatic adverse events: antibiotic resistance and similarity of bacteria causing adverse events. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91:148–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2007.00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hsiao CH, Chuang CC, Tan HY, Ma DHK, Lin KK, Chang CJ, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ocular infection: a 10-year hospital-based study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(8) doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hasani A, Sheikhalizadeh V, Hasani A, Naghili B, Valizadeh V, Nikoonijad AR. Methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Appraising therapeutic approaches in the Northwest of Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2013;5:56–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaleem F, Usman J, Hassan A, Omair M, Khalid A, Uddin R. Sensitivity pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients admitted in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. Iran J Microbiol. 2010;2:143–146. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Havaei S, Vidovic S, Narimani T, Kazemi M, Karbalaei M, Starnino S, et al. Epidemic Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Lineages Are the Main Cause of Infections at an Iranian University Hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3990–3993. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05445-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES