Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1971 Dec;68(12):2941–2944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.2941

Fractionation of Liver Chromatin

Keiji Marushige *, James Bonner †
PMCID: PMC389565  PMID: 5289239

Abstract

Rat liver chromatin has been fractionated into two fractions on the basis of precipitability in standard saline after mild treatment with DNase II. The major portion of liver chromatin contains little nonhistone protein and is enriched in histones, while a minor portion of such chromatin, with which RNA polymerase is associated, is highly enriched in proteins other than histone and impoverished in histones. Although the relative concentrations of the several histone species present in two chromatin fractions are identical, binding of histones to DNA in the minor fractions appears to be modified, presumably by the presence of proteins other than histones.

Keywords: DNase II, differential precipitation, RNA polymerase, rat liver

Full text

PDF
2941

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bekhor I., Kung G. M., Bonner J. Sequence-specific interaction of DNA and chromosomal protein. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jan;39(2):351–364. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90322-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonner J., Dahmus M. E., Fambrough D., Huang R. C., Marushige K., Tuan D. Y. The Biology of Isolated Chromatin: Chromosomes, biologically active in the test tube, provide a powerful tool for the study of gene action. Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):47–56. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHIH R., HUANG C., BONNER J., MURRAY K. PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF SOLUBLE NUCLEOHISTONES. J Mol Biol. 1964 Jan;8:54–64. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80148-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUANG R. C., BONNER J. Histone, a suppressor of chromosomal RNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Jul 15;48:1216–1222. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.7.1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang R. C., Huang P. C. Effect of protein-bound RNA associated with chick embryo chromatin on template specificity of the chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1969 Jan;39(2):365–378. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90323-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li H. J., Bonner J. Interaction of histone half-molecules with deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry. 1971 Apr 13;10(8):1461–1470. doi: 10.1021/bi00784a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marushige K., Bonner J. Template properties of liver chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1966 Jan;15(1):160–174. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80218-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marushige K., Dixon G. H. Developmental changes in chromosomal composition and template activity during spermatogenesis in trout testis. Dev Biol. 1969 Apr;19(4):397–414. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(69)90050-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marushige K., Ozaki H. Properties of isolated chromatin from sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol. 1967 Nov;16(5):474–488. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90060-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paul J., Gilmour R. S. Organ-specific restriction of transcription in mammalian chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jul 14;34(2):305–316. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90255-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STUDIER F. W. SEDIMENTATION STUDIES OF THE SIZE AND SHAPE OF DNA. J Mol Biol. 1965 Feb;11:373–390. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shih T. Y., Bonner J. Thermal denaturation and template properties of DNA complexes with purified histone fractions. J Mol Biol. 1970 Mar;48(3):469–487. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith K. D., Church R. B., McCarthy B. J. Template specificity of isolated chromatin. Biochemistry. 1969 Nov;8(11):4271–4277. doi: 10.1021/bi00839a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan C. H., Miyagi M. Specificity of transcription of chromatin in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1970 Jun 28;50(3):641–653. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VINOGRAD J., BRUNER R., KENT R., WEIGLE J. Band-centrifugation of macromolecules and viruses in self-generating density gradients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Jun;49:902–910. doi: 10.1073/pnas.49.6.902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. YOUNG E. T., 2nd, SINSHEIMER R. L. A COMPARISON OF THE INITIAL ACTIONS OF SPLEEN DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE AND PANCREATIC DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE. J Biol Chem. 1965 Mar;240:1274–1280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES