Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1972 Oct;69(10):2954–2958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.10.2954

Mechanism of Cytolysis by Complement

Manfred M Mayer 1
PMCID: PMC389682  PMID: 4117012

Abstract

The attack of complement is directed against the lipid moiety of the cell membrane; a single lesion at the site of fixation of complement proteins C5-C9 is responsible for lysis of a cell. There are two hypothetical models for the generation of this membrane lesion. The first of these, designated the leaky-patch model, postulates either direct enzymatic attack or enzymatic generation of a lytic substance by C5-C9. As a result, the phospholipid bilayer of the membrane would be disrupted and a leaky patch permitting passage of water and salt would appear. However, this hole would persist only as long as enzymatic action continues. Thus, the leaky-patch model would not produce a stable hole, and for this reason it is considered an unlikely mechanism.

The second hypothesis, termed the doughnut model, describes a structural concept for creating a hydrophilic passage through the hydrophobic phospholipid bilayer of the membrane. In essence, this would be a rigid and hollow structure, like a doughnut, with a hydrophobic exterior, which is inserted into the phospholipid bilayer of the cell membrane in such a way that its hollow hydrophilic core becomes a channel through which salt and water can exchange freely between the interior of the cell and the extracellular environment. The late-acting complement proteins C5-C9 are the most probable source of the structural components of the doughnut. A combination of the leaky-patch and doughnut models may represent the most likely mechanism.

Keywords: erythrocytes, leaky-patch model, doughnut model

Full text

PDF
2954

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BORSOS T., DOURMASHKIN R. R., HUMPHREY J. H. LESIONS IN ERYTHROCYTE MEMBRANES CAUSED BY IMMUNE HAEMOLYSIS. Nature. 1964 Apr 18;202:251–252. doi: 10.1038/202251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CONDREA E., DEVRIES A., MAGER J. HEMOLYSIS AND SPLITTING OF HUMAN ERYTHROCYTE PHOSPHOLIPIDS BY SNAKE VENOMS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Feb 24;84:60–73. doi: 10.1016/0926-6542(64)90101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper N. R., Müller-Eberhard H. J. The reaction mechanism of human C5 in immune hemolysis. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):775–793. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GREEN H., BARROW P., GOLDBERG B. Effect of antibody and complement on permeability control in ascites tumor cells and erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1959 Nov 1;110:699–713. doi: 10.1084/jem.110.5.699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Götze O., Müller-Eberhard H. J. Lysis of erythrocytes by complement in the absence of antibody. J Exp Med. 1970 Nov;132(5):898–915. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hesketh T. R., Dourmashkin R. R., Payne S. N., Humphrey J. H., Lachmann P. J. Lesions due to complement in lipid membranes. Nature. 1971 Oct 29;233(5322):620–623. doi: 10.1038/233620a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Humphrey J. H., Dourmashkin R. R. The lesions in cell membranes caused by complement. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:75–115. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60478-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inoue K., Kinsky S. C. Fate of phospholipids in liposomal model membranes damaged by antibody and complement. Biochemistry. 1970 Nov 24;9(24):4767–4776. doi: 10.1021/bi00826a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kinsky S. C., Haxby J. A., Zopf D. A., Alving C. R., Kinsky C. B. Complement-dependent damage to liposomes prepared from pure lipids and Forssman hapten. Biochemistry. 1969 Oct;8(10):4149–4158. doi: 10.1021/bi00838a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kolb W. P., Haxby J. A., Arroyave C. M., Müller-Eberhard H. J. Molecular analysis of the membrane attack mechanism of complement. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):549–566. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.3.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lachmann P. J., Thompson R. A. Reactive lysis: the complement-mediated lysis of unsensitized cells. II. The characterization of activated reactor as C56 and the participation of C8 and C9. J Exp Med. 1970 Apr 1;131(4):643–657. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.4.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mayer M. M., Miller J. A., Shin H. S. A specific method for purification of the second component of guinea pig complement and a chemical evaluation of the one-hit theory. J Immunol. 1970 Aug;105(2):327–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Müller-Eberhard H. J., Polley M. J., Calcott M. A. Formation and functional significance of a molecular complex derived from the second and the fourth component of human complement. J Exp Med. 1967 Feb 1;125(2):359–380. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.2.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Opferkuch W., Rapp H. J., Colten H. R., Borsos T. Immune hemolysis and the functional properties of the second (C2) and fourth (C4) components of complement. II. Clustering of effective C42 complexes at individual hemolytic sites. J Immunol. 1971 Feb;106(2):407–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PHILLIPS G. B., MIDDLETON E., Jr STUDIES ON LYSOLECITHIN FORMATION IN IMMUNE HEMOLYSIS. J Immunol. 1965 Jan;94:40–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Polley M. J., Müller-Eberhard H. J., Feldman J. D. Production of ultrastructural membrane lesions by the fifth component of complement. J Exp Med. 1971 Jan 1;133(1):53–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pressman B. C. Induced active transport of ions in mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 May;53(5):1076–1083. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.5.1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shin H. S., Pickering R. J., Mayer M. M. The fifth component of the guinea pig complement system. 3. Dissociation and transfer of C5b, and the probable site of C5b fixation. J Immunol. 1971 Feb;106(2):480–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith J. K., Becker E. L. Serum complement and the enzymatic degradation of erythrocyte phospholipid. J Immunol. 1968 Mar;100(3):459–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stolfi R. L. Immune lytic transformation: a state of irreversible damage generated as a result of the reaction of the eighth component in the guinea pig complement system. J Immunol. 1968 Jan;100(1):46–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Valentine R. C., Shapiro B. M., Stadtman E. R. Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1968 Jun;7(6):2143–2152. doi: 10.1021/bi00846a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES