Abstract
Aicardi–Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a hereditary autoimmune disease which overlaps clinically and pathogenetically with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and can be regarded as a monogenic variant of SLE. Both conditions are characterized by chronic activation of anti-viral type I interferon (IFN) responses. AGS can be caused by mutations in one of several genes encoding intracellular enzymes all involved in nucleic acid metabolism. Mouse models of AGS-associated defects yielded distinct phenotypes and reproduced important features of the disease. Analysis of these mutant mouse lines stimulated a new concept of autoimmunity caused by intracellular accumulations of nucleic acids, which trigger a chronic cell-intrinsic antiviral type I IFN response and thereby autoimmunity. This model is of major relevance for our understanding of SLE pathogenesis. Findings in gene-targeted mice deficient for AGS associated enzymes are summarized in this review.
Keywords: Aicardi–Goutières syndrome, interferon, nucleic acid sensing, SLE
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibodies to conserved nuclear antigens such as DNA, histones and ribonuclear proteins (‘anti-nuclear antibodies’). Deposition of immune complexes in tissues is considered a key pathogenic event. Clinical presentation of the disease is characterized by considerable heterogeneity, and manifestations can include arthritis, dermatitis, nephritis and CNS inflammation. SLE patients typically feature chronic activation of the type I interferon (IFN) system 1–2, which most probably represents a critical event in the breakdown of self-tolerance 3–6. A major trigger for type I IFN responses is recognition of viral nucleic acid by pattern recognition receptors of the innate immune system 7–8. Importantly, discrimination between endogenous and microbial nucleic acids by mammalian innate sensors is not perfect, and excessive amounts of free self-nucleic acids or their appearance in compartments that are nucleic acid-free in the healthy organism can trigger anti-viral IFN responses in the absence of infection 9. In SLE, genetic defects of mechanisms responsible for the disposal of apoptotic cells, cellular debris and nucleic acids play an important role in abnormal exposure of innate nucleic acids sensors to endogenous nucleic acids 10,11.
An important extension of the concept of pathogenic IFN responses triggered by endogenous nucleic acids came from research into the pathogenesis of the rare hereditary autoimmune disease Aicardi–Goutières syndrome (AGS). AGS manifests perinatally or in early childhood with encephalitis and severe neurological impairment 13–14. The disease overlaps clinically and genetically with SLE 14,15, and can be regarded as a monogenic variant of SLE. In addition, mutations in three prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1) or SAM domain and HD domain-containing protein 1 (SAMHD1) have been shown to cause a rare cutaneous form of lupus 14–19. AGS mimics intrauterine viral infection and is characterized by chronic activation of the type I IFN system 14–20. The syndrome can be caused by mutations in one of several intracellular enzymes, which are involved in nucleic acid metabolism; 3′ repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1) is the most abundant intracellular 3′–5′ DNA exonuclease displaying the highest activity on dsDNA with 3′ overhangs 21–22. RNase H2 is a ribonuclease which digests the RNA moiety of DNA/RNA hybrids 23. It also incises 5′ of a single ribonucleotide embedded in a DNA double helix 23–24. SAMHD1 is a deoxyguanosine triphosphate (dGTP)-dependent deoxynucleotide-triphosphate (dNTP) triphosphohydrolase which cleaves dNTPs into inorganic triphosphate and nucleosides 25–26. However, the interaction of SAMHD1 with nucleic acids 27–28 might reflect other important functional features. For example, SAMHD1 was reported to have 3′–5′ exonuclease activity and cleave ssDNA or ssRNA as well as the RNA strand of DNA/RNA hybrids 29. Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) is an RNA-editing enzyme, which deaminates adenosine to inosine 30. Targeted inactivation of the genes encoding TREX1, RNase H2 or ADAR1 in mice resulted in distinct phenotypes. Information obtained from the analysis of these mutants has greatly promoted our understanding of physiological functions of these enzymes as well as the pathogenesis of AGS and SLE.
Systemic type I IFN-driven autoimmunity in Trex1–/– mice
Morita et al. generated mice with complete loss of TREX1 (Trex1–/– mice) by replacing part of the coding sequence with a neomycin resistance cassette 31. Animals homozygous for this mutation featured a reduced lifespan with a median survival of 6 months. Until then, TREX1 was regarded primarily as a repair enzyme with functions in DNA base excision repair 32–33. Therefore, it came as a surprise that the cause of lethality was not increased mutation rates and malignant growth, but rather an inflammatory disease. Most animals died of spontaneous myocarditis and subsequent circulatory failure 31. In a later study, histological analysis also revealed an increased incidence of inflammatory changes in multiple other organs of Trex1–/– animals 34. The lethal inflammatory phenotype of Trex1–/– mice remained unexplained until Stetson and Medzhitov found that the condition was autoimmune in nature 35. They showed that the animals develop autoantibodies reactive with determinants of murine heart and that the disease of TREX1-deficient mice could be prevented by crossing the animals onto a RAG2–/– lymphocyte-deficient background 35. A later study reported an increased incidence of anti-nuclear antibodies in Trex–/– mice, which is typical of lupus-like systemic autoimmune disease 34. Most importantly, Stetson and Medzhitov found a striking transcriptional signature of type I IFN-inducible genes in Trex1–/– heart tissue, suggesting that loss of TREX1 resulted in a spontaneous activation of an anti-viral type I IFN response 35. Because chronic exposure to type I IFN can induce autoimmunity, the authors asked whether type I IFN was pathogenetically relevant in Trex1–/– mice and crossed them onto a type I IFN receptor-deficient (IFNAR–/–) background. Trex–/–IFNAR–/– mice were completely devoid of pathology demonstrating the pivotal role of type I IFN in the pathogenesis 35. The finding that loss of a cytosolic nuclease triggered a spontaneous cell-intrinsic anti-viral IFN response stimulated the hypothesis that TREX1-deficiency results in accumulation of nucleic acids in the cytosol which are sensed by the cellular innate immune system 35.
This concept raised the question of which innate sensor pathways induced chronic IFN expression in Trex1–/– mice. Two transcription factors, IFN regulatory transcription factor (IRF)3 and IRF7, are essential for induction of type I IFN genes in response to viral infection. The constitutively expressed factor IRF3 is considered critical for the early IFN response to immunostimulatory DNA, while the IFN-inducible factor IRF7 was reported to amplify the response in later phases 36–37. Stetson and Medzhitov found that additional knock-out of the IRF3 gene prevented the pathology of Trex1–/– mice 35. Gall et al. reported that deficiency for the adaptor molecule stimulator of IFN genes (STING) also resulted in rescue of the Trex1–/– phenotype 34. Thus, via an unknown sensor, the putative nucleic acid accumulating in Trex1–/– cells seems to trigger the STING-dependent ISD-response pathway 37 resulting in IFN gene induction by IRF3.
Another important question is where and in which cell type the pathogenic IFN response occurs in Trex1–/– mice. Gall et al. visualized type I IFN action on IFN-responsive cells in Trex1–/– mice by crossing TREX1-deficiency to mice harbouring a type I IFN-inducible Cre transgene (Mx1–Cre) and a Cre-excision reporter allele (R26Y) 34. A few days after birth, the majority of blood leucocytes had already been exposed to IFN. In the heart, the major target organ of autoimmunity in Trex1–/– mice, reporter-expressing cells were first observed in a circumscribed subendocardial area of the myocardium in neonatal mice. Experiments based on transplantation of wild-type or IFNAR–/– bone marrow into irradiated Trex1–/– recipients suggested non-haematopoietic cells as the primary source and haematopoietic cells as important targets of the pathogenic type I IFN 34. Crosses of Trex1–/– mice to B cell- or T cell-deficient strains revealed that inflammatory pathology in most tissues depends upon T cells with no detectable role for B cells. Nevertheless, the glomerulonephritis of TREX1-deficient mice required a functional B cell system, and the absence of B cells delayed mortality of Trex1–/– mice significantly 34.
While the essential role of type I IFN in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity ensuing from loss of TREX1 is undisputed 35, induction of genes encoding type I IFN seems to be restricted to particular cell types key to the pathogenetic chain. As shown by Hasan et al., other cell types of Trex1–/– mice, including fibroblasts, also activate the STING/TBK1/IRF3-dependent cytosolic DNA sensing pathway and thereby induce a spectrum of anti-viral genes; however, in these cells anti-viral gene induction occurs in an IFN-independent manner 38. In the same study, Hasan et al. also demonstrated that the late endolysosomal compartment is enlarged in Trex1–/– mice and that TREX1 functions to reduce mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity resulting in IRF3-mediated, IFN-independent induction of anti-viral genes as well as enhanced biogenesis of lysosomes. IFN-independent induction of anti-viral genes conferred relative resistance of TREX1-deficient cells to viral infection 38. Whether or not this novel pathway also contributes to AGS and lupus pathogenesis remains to be determined.
Trex1–/– cells were found to display spontaneous DNA damage and chronic checkpoint activation 39, while this finding was not reproduced by others 35. Whether loss of a function of TREX1 in DNA repair or genome maintenance resulting in a spontaneous DNA damage response contributes to pathogenesis in mice and humans with mutations in TREX1 is currently unclear.
In conclusion, TREX1-deficient mice have proved invaluable to shed light on the molecular pathogenesis of TREX1-associated AGS. Important questions to be answered include the following: (i) what is the nature of nucleic acids, which may accumulate in Trex1–/– cells and trigger the cellular innate anti-viral response; (ii) which sensors trigger the pathogenic IFN response; and (iii) why is the major target organ in AGS, the CNS, spared in murine TREX1-deficiency, which triggers autoimmunity in numerous other organs but not in the brain?
Genome instability due to increased genomic ribonucleotide load in RNase H2-deficient mice
Mammalian RNase H2 is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three subunits, RNase H2A, B and C, which are each encoded by a separate gene 40. The A subunit carries the catalytic centre while the B and C subunits provide scaffolding and sites for protein interactions 23–41. All three subunits of the yeast and human enzyme are required for activity in vitro 40–42 and AGS can be caused by mutations in any of the three genes 40. The mutations found in AGS patients seem to reduce but not to abrogate activity of the enzyme, and bi-allelic null mutations in any of the three Rnaseh2 genes have not been described in humans. This suggests that complete loss of RNase H2 activity results in early intrauterine lethality 40. In accordance with this notion, mice that were completely devoid of RNase H2 activity died in utero. Targeted inactivation of RNase H2 subunits was performed independently by two different groups 43–44. Reijns et al. generated mice carrying a premature stop in exon 7 of the Rnaseh2b gene, resulting in complete loss of RNase H2 activity (Rnaseh2b–/– mice). We generated Rnaseh2c–/– mice by replacing the complete coding region of the gene by a resistance cassette. Both groups also used Rnaseh2b ‘knock-out first’ (Rnaseh2bKOF) mice [European Conditional Mouse Mutagenesis Program (EUCOMM), see below] to obtain mice with ubiquitous Cre-mediated deletion of exon 5, resulting in a frame shift and absence of RNase H2B protein. All these mutations led to complete loss of RNase H2 activity and resulted in similar embryonic lethality commencing on approximately embryonic day 9·5 (E9·5) 43–44. Mutant embryos appeared normal at E6·5, but were reduced in size at E7·5 compared to controls 44. At E9·5 massive developmental defects became evident and mutant embryos all died before E11·5 44. The Rnaseh2bKOF mutation, an insertion of a splice acceptor followed by a translational stop element into introns 4–5 of the Rnaseh2b gene, was designed to completely prevent expression 45. However, we found that this mutation represents a hypomorphic allele with normal splicing from exon 4 to exon 5 occurring at a low rate, resulting in low residual enzyme activity 43. Rnaseh2bKOF/KOF embryos featured delayed lethality compared to embryos with complete deficiency for the enzyme, were smaller than controls at E14·5 and died perinatally 43. Histological analysis of stillborn Rnaseh2bKOF/KOF mice revealed proportionally small organs and no inflammatory changes that could explain lethality 43. RNase H2-deficient embryos and cell lines grown from such embryos showed reduced proliferation compared to control embryos and cells 43–44. In order to elucidate the reasons for proliferative defect and early lethality, global gene expression profiles of whole E9·5 Rnaseh2b–/– embryos and E14·5 Rnaseh2bKOF/KOF fetal liver cells were investigated by Reijns et al. and ourselves, respectively, with remarkably similar results 43–44. While no expression signatures indicative of inflammatory or type I IFN responses were detected, several p53-inducible genes were found up-regulated in mutant versus control samples, including the cell cycle inhibitor p21 encoded by the Cdkn1a gene. This finding suggested that compromised RNase H2 activity might lead to DNA damage and thereby cause cell cycle arrest.
Reijns et al. stained E6·5 Rnaseh2b–/– embryos for histone H2A.X phosphorylated at serine 139 (pH2AX), which marks DNA double-strand breaks, and found high numbers of pH2AX foci in mutant but not control epiblast cells 44. We detected increased numbers of pH2AX foci in E18·5 Rnaseh2bKOF/KOF thymocytes and liver cells compared to control cells 43. On a p53-deficient background, a partial rescue of the Rnaseh2b–/– embryonic phenotype and the proliferative impairment of Rnaseh2b–/– cells were observed 44. Rnaseh2b–/–p53–/– cells displayed genomic instability with frequent occurrence of micronuclei and chromosomal rearrangements 44. These findings suggested strongly that the lethal phenotype of RNase H2-deficient embryos was caused by a spontaneous DNA damage response.
Nick McElhinny et al. demonstrated genomic instability in RNase H2-deficient yeast due to increased numbers of ribonucleotides contained in the genomic DNA 46. The high ribonucleotide load of mutant yeast DNA was reflected in enhanced sensitivity to alkaline hydrolysis. This finding suggested that RNase H2 functions to remove ribonucleotides misincorporated by replicative polymerases. Reijns et al. found that DNA from Rnaseh2b–/– E9·5 embryos, like the mutant yeast DNA, featured increased alkali sensitivity 44. We used the specificity of prokaryotic RNase HII, which incises DNA at ribonucleotides embedded in the double helix, for ribonucleotide detection in DNA from RNase H2-deficient E9·5 embryos. Nicks introduced by the bacterial enzyme were visualized by nick translation-based incorporation of radioactive label 43. This approach also revealed a dramatic increase in the ribonucleotide load of mutant genomic DNA. Based on the lengths of alkaline hydrolysis fragments, Reijns et al. determined that the DNA from RNase H2-deficient embryos contained one ribonucleotide per 7600 base pairs (bp). If not removed, misincorporated ribonucleotides therefore represent the most common lesion in mammalian DNA 44.
Ribonucleotide accumulation in DNA from RNase H2-deficient mice probably originate from misincorporation by replicative DNA polymerases, which was shown to be a frequent event in yeast 47. Incomplete removal of Okazaki fragment RNA primers or spontaneous oxidation of DNA 48 might also contribute to the genomic ribonucleotide content. The presence of high numbers of ribonucleotides in DNA can cause DNA damage by several different mechanisms. Spontaneous hydrolysis at two neighbouring ribonucleotides on opposite strands might result in double-strand breaks. Ribonucleotides in genomic DNA were also shown to cause replication fork stalling in yeast 49. Furthermore, topoisomerase-I was reported to cleave double-stranded DNA containing single ribonucleotides 50. Topoisomerase-I-mediated cleavage of DNA entails the transient formation of a covalent bond of the enzyme to 5′ end. Presence of widespread topoisomerase-I cleavage complexes may result in their frequent collision with replication forks and the formation of double-strand breaks 51. Moreover, topoisomerase-I-mediated cleavage of DNA substrates containing a single ribonucleotide can result in formation of a 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate end 50–52, the processing of which could lead to manifestation of strand breaks.
An intriguing question is whether accumulation of ribonucleotides in genomic DNA, genomic instability and a chronic DNA damage response could contribute to the pathogenesis of AGS and related human disorders. Repair of genomic ribonucleotides in the absence of RNase H2 might produce aberrant nucleic acid species responsible for activation of the IFN system in the human. Genome-wide transcriptome profiling of RNase H2-deficient embryos, however, did not reveal a signature of IFN-inducible genes 43–44. Inflammatory changes indicative of autoimmune disease were not observed in stillborn Rnaseh2bKOF/KOF neonates and crosses to IFNAR–/– or lymphocyte-deficient backgrounds did not improve survival 43. Thus, cell-intrinsic activation of an anti-viral innate response, as observed in Trex1–/– and Adar1–/– animals (see below), does not occur in the RNase H2 mutant models analysed so far. IFN-mediated autoimmune pathology reflecting potential additional functions of RNase H2 in the removal of endogenous nucleic acids species might occur at later stages of ontogeny in mouse models of less severe or conditional RNase H2 deficiency, which bypass early lethality. Less severe reduction of RNase H2 activity in AGS patients compared with the current mouse models could be the reason that a DNA damage-related phenotype dominates in these mice, while RNase H2-associated AGS is characterized prominently by autoimmunity. Importantly, spontaneous DNA damage and chronic checkpoint activation were also observed in Trex1–/– cells 39.
Loss of ADAR1 in mice causes embryonic lethality associated with spontaneous induction of type I IFN-inducible genes
ADAR1 is a hydrolase that deaminates adenosine to inosine (‘A-to-I editing’) in dsRNA 30. In man and mouse, two isoforms are transcribed from at least two different promotors. Whereas the shorter isoform (p110) is expressed constitutively, the full-length protein, p150, is inducible by types I and II IFNs 53–54. The isoforms differ in their subcellular localization, probably reflecting distinct physiological functions 55–56. While mutations of the Adar1 gene were demonstrated only recently to cause AGS 20, various mouse models for ADAR1 deficiency were already described several years ago. Chimeric embryos with a high contribution of Adar1 mutant cells died in utero due to defective erythropoiesis 57. Using Cre-loxP technology, Wang et al. and Hartner et al. succeeded in the generation of ADAR1-deficient mice and found that embryos homozygous for the defective allele displayed embryonic lethality associated with increased rates of apoptosis in the liver 58–59. Consistent with early lethality of Adar1–/– embryos, mutations identified in AGS patients were mainly missense variants predicted to result in reduction rather than complete loss of enzymatic activity 20. Hartner et al. and XuFeng et al. demonstrated an essential role of ADAR1 in haematopoietic precursor cells 60–61 and in haematopoietic stem cells 60. Hartner et al. performed global transcriptome analysis of Adar1–/– fetal liver haematopoietic stem cells and found a striking up-regulation of type I IFN-inducible genes. A similar transcriptional signature of type I IFN-inducible genes was found in cells of the erythroid lineage and in non-haematopoietic tissues of E11 Adar1–/– embryos. Transcription of one of the up-regulated genes most strongly in ADAR1-deficient haematopoietic stem cells, Stat1, was not enhanced in Adar1–/– myeloid cells, suggesting that spontaneous activation of the type I IFN system in response to loss of ADAR1 might be a cell type-specific phenomenon. Among the induced genes, several genes encoding RNA binding proteins [Toll-like receptor (TLR)-3, protein kinase R (PKR), retinoic acid-inducible gene 1 (RIG-I)] could be identified, hinting at an accumulation of a RNA species that might trigger the IFN production in ADAR1-deficient cells 60. The transcriptional signature of ADAR1-deficient cells correlated with the signature of IFN-inducible genes found in cells expressing a variant of the dsRNA binding protein NF90 62. As ADAR1 was shown to interact with NF90 63, this finding could reflect the involvement of both proteins in the same IFN regulatory pathway. In addition to its dsRNA binding domain, ADAR1 also possess a Z-DNA binding domain in the N-terminal part 64, potentially pointing to a mechanism of IFN induction that might be independent of the RNA-editing function of ADAR1. Functional dissection of the two ADAR1 isoforms, IFN-inducible p150 and constitutively expressed p110, could be instrumental in the elucidation of the suppression of an IFN response by ADAR1. However, a first attempt to abrogate expression of the IFN-inducible p150 isoform selectively by gene targeting 65 remains controversial 66–67.
In conclusion, like Trex1–/– mice, ADAR1-deficient animals are characterized by spontaneous IFN production and thus reproduce an important feature of humans carrying ADAR1 mutations. As in the case of Trex1–/– mice, urgent questions include whether an abnormal accumulation of nucleic acids is the trigger of the IFN response and which signalling pathways are responsible for the induction of IFN genes.
A unifying concept of AGS pathogenesis?
According to a fascinating concept that could explain spontaneous IFN release, the AGS-associated enzymes might restrict the activity of endogenous retroviruses or retrotransposons. This idea was first proposed by Stetson and Medzhitov based on experiments in TREX1-deficient mice 35. Intriguingly, AGS-associated enzymes were shown to affect the replication of exogenous retrovirus. TREX1 degrades non-productive by-products of reverse transcription 68 and prevents their sensing by cellular pattern recognition receptors and induction of an anti-viral IFN response. Thus, TREX1 serves to hide HIV from the innate immune system. ADAR1 was reported to promote HIV replication 69–70; however, anti-retroviral effects of ADAR1 were demonstrated in a recent study 71. SAMHD1 potently suppresses HIV replication in non-cycling human cells by degrading dNTPs and reducing their concentration below a threshold required for viral reverse transcription 25–74. Thus, defects of enzymes affecting retroviral replication result in spontaneous activation of type I IFN responses. However, despite this link of AGS-associated enzymes to viral control, and despite the clinical and biochemical similarities of AGS to congenital viral infection, no causal role of an exogenous retrovirus in AGS could be established. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that replication intermediates of germline-encoded fossil retroviruses or retrotransposons could accumulate in the absence of the AGS-associated enzymes. Their sensing by intracellular pattern recognition receptors might trigger the pathogenic IFN response and lead to autoimmunity. In support of this concept, Stetson et al. detected retroelement-encoded DNA in the cytosol of Trex1–/– heart cells and observed enhanced activity of retrotransposition reporter elements in vitro 35, thus providing evidence for enhanced activity of retroelements in the absence of TREX1. Importantly, systemic administration of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors ameliorated the pathology of Trex1–/– mice significantly 75, suggesting that inhibition of retroelement activity might represent a therapeutic approach in human autoimmune disease.
In addition to replication intermediates of endogenous retroelements, nucleic acids originating during DNA replication or repair could accumulate in cells lacking AGS-associated enzymes, and were discussed as the triggers of autoimmunity. Yang et al. found that the cytoplasmic compartment of Trex1–/– cells stained with an anti-ssDNA antibody and detected an ssDNA oligonucleotide of 60–65 bases in mutant but not control cells 39.
Perspective
Significant differences in the molecular response to inflammatory stimuli between mouse and man, as highlighted recently 76, limit modelling of human disease in the mouse. However, despite enormous interspecies differences, Trex1–/– and Adar–/– mice reproduce spontaneously the unbalanced type I IFN production of SLE and AGS patients with defects in these genes. These findings point to a pathogenic IFN-inducing principle that is conserved in evolution and is therefore of fundamental relevance. Defects of the enzymes TREX1, RNase H2, ADAR1 and SAMHD1 can all cause AGS. It will be crucial to clarify whether or not the four enzymes all function in the same pathway or rather in different pathways to prevent spontaneous IFN production. The AGS-associated enzymes might, for example, all prevent the accumulation of the same pathogenic nucleic acid species. Alternatively, different nucleic acids originating from different processes could accumulate as a result of compromised activity of each of the four enzymes. We have recently generated SAMHD1-deficient mice and are currently analysing these mutants for spontaneous activation of anti-viral innate immunity. Identification of the nucleic acid species triggering autoimmunity in AGS remains an important task that will contribute significantly to our understanding of molecular mechanisms that cause SLE.
Acknowledgments
We thank MinAe Lee-Kirsch and Alexander Gerbaulet for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by DFG grant Ro2133/6-1 (KFO 249) to A.R., ‘MeDDrive’ grant 60.230 and 60.294 of the Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU-Dresden, to R.B.
Disclosure
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Baechler EC, Batliwalla FM, Karypis G, et al. Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:2610–2615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337679100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bennett L, Palucka AK, Arce E, et al. Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood. J Exp Med. 2003;197:711–723. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trinchieri G. Type I interferon: friend or foe? J Exp Med. 2010;207:2053–2063. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Banchereau J, Pascual V. Type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases. Immunity. 2006;25:383–392. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bronson PG, Chaivorapol C, Ortmann W, Behrens TW, Graham RR. The genetics of type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24:530–537. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Theofilopoulos AN, Baccala R, Beutler B, Kono DH. Type I interferons (alpha/beta) in immunity and autoimmunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:307–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kawai T, Akira S. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:131–137. doi: 10.1038/ni1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:373–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ablasser A, Hertrich C, Wassermann R, Hornung V. Nucleic acid driven sterile inflammation. Clin Immunol. 2013;147:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nagata S, Hanayama R, Kawane K. Autoimmunity and the clearance of dead cells. Cell. 2010;140:619–630. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:823–835. doi: 10.1038/nri1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shlomchik MJ. Activating systemic autoimmunity: B's, T's, and tolls. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21:626–633. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2009.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aicardi J, Goutieres F. A progressive familial encephalopathy in infancy with calcifications of the basal ganglia and chronic cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytosis. Ann Neurol. 1984;15:49–54. doi: 10.1002/ana.410150109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rice G, Patrick T, Parmar R, et al. Clinical and molecular phenotype of Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:713–725. doi: 10.1086/521373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramantani G, Kohlhase J, Hertzberg C, et al. Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of lupus erythematosus in Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1469–1477. doi: 10.1002/art.27367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee-Kirsch MA, Gong M, Chowdhury D, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the 3′–5′ DNA exonuclease TREX1 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1065–1067. doi: 10.1038/ng2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee-Kirsch MA, Gong M, Schulz H, et al. Familial chilblain lupus, a monogenic form of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, maps to chromosome 3p. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79:731–737. doi: 10.1086/507848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee-Kirsch MA, Chowdhury D, Harvey S, et al. A mutation in TREX1 that impairs susceptibility to granzyme A-mediated cell death underlies familial chilblain lupus. J Mol Med (Berl) 2007;85:531–537. doi: 10.1007/s00109-007-0199-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ravenscroft JC, Suri M, Rice GI, Szynkiewicz M, Crow YJ. Autosomal dominant inheritance of a heterozygous mutation in SAMHD1 causing familial chilblain lupus. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:235–237. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rice GI, Kasher PR, Forte GM, et al. Mutations in ADAR1 cause Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome associated with a type I interferon signature. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1243–1248. doi: 10.1038/ng.2414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lindahl T, Gally JA, Edelman GM. Properties of deoxyribonuclease 3 from mammalian tissues. J Biol Chem. 1969;244:5014–5019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mazur DJ, Perrino FW. Structure and expression of the TREX1 and TREX2 3′→5′ exonuclease genes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14718–14727. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010051200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chon H, Vassilev A, DePamphilis ML, et al. Contributions of the two accessory subunits, RNASEH2B and RNASEH2C, to the activity and properties of the human RNase H2 complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:96–110. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eder PS, Walder RY, Walder JA. Substrate specificity of human RNase H1 and its role in excision repair of ribose residues misincorporated in DNA. Biochimie. 1993;75:123–126. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(93)90033-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goldstone DC, Ennis-Adeniran V, Hedden JJ, et al. HIV-1 restriction factor SAMHD1 is a deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase. Nature. 2011;480:379–382. doi: 10.1038/nature10623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Powell RD, Holland PJ, Hollis T, Perrino FW. Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome gene and HIV-1 restriction factor SAMHD1 is a dGTP-regulated deoxynucleotide triphosphohydrolase. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:43596–43600. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C111.317628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goncalves A, Karayel E, Rice GI, et al. SAMHD1 is a nucleic-acid binding protein that is mislocalized due to Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome-associated mutations. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1116–1122. doi: 10.1002/humu.22087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tungler V, Staroske W, Kind B, et al. Single-stranded nucleic acids promote SAMHD1 complex formation. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013;91:759–770. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-0995-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Beloglazova N, Flick R, Tchigvintsev A, et al. Nuclease activity of the human SAMHD1 protein implicated in the Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome and HIV-1 restriction. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:8101–8110. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.431148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim U, Garner TL, Sanford T, Speicher D, Murray JM, Nishikura K. Purification and characterization of double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase from bovine nuclear extracts. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:13480–13489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morita M, Stamp G, Robins P, et al. Gene-targeted mice lacking the Trex1 (DNase III) 3′→5′ DNA exonuclease develop inflammatory myocarditis. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:6719–6727. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.15.6719-6727.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mazur DJ, Perrino FW. Identification and expression of the TREX1 and TREX2 cDNA sequences encoding mammalian 3′→5′ exonucleases. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:19655–19660. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.28.19655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mazur DJ, Perrino FW. Excision of 3′ termini by the Trex1 and TREX2 3′→5′ exonucleases. Characterization of the recombinant proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:17022–17029. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100623200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gall A, Treuting P, Elkon KB, et al. Autoimmunity initiates in nonhematopoietic cells and progresses via lymphocytes in an interferon-dependent autoimmune disease. Immunity. 2012;36:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stetson DB, Ko JS, Heidmann T, Medzhitov R. Trex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity. Cell. 2008;134:587–598. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sato M, Suemori H, Hata N, et al. Distinct and essential roles of transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7 in response to viruses for IFN-alpha/beta gene induction. Immunity. 2000;13:539–548. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00053-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stetson DB, Medzhitov R. Type I interferons in host defense. Immunity. 2006;25:373–381. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hasan M, Koch J, Rakheja D, et al. Trex1 regulates lysosomal biogenesis and interferon-independent activation of antiviral genes. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:61–71. doi: 10.1038/ni.2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang YG, Lindahl T, Barnes DE. Trex1 exonuclease degrades ssDNA to prevent chronic checkpoint activation and autoimmune disease. Cell. 2007;131:873–886. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Crow YJ, Leitch A, Hayward BE, et al. Mutations in genes encoding ribonuclease H2 subunits cause Aicardi–Goutieres syndrome and mimic congenital viral brain infection. Nat Genet. 2006;38:910–916. doi: 10.1038/ng1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bubeck D, Reijns MA, Graham SC, Astell KR, Jones EY, Jackson AP. PCNA directs type 2 RNase H activity on DNA replication and repair substrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:3652–3666. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jeong HS, Backlund PS, Chen HC, Karavanov AA, Crouch RJ. RNase H2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a complex of three proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:407–414. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hiller B, Achleitner M, Glage S, Naumann R, Behrendt R, Roers A. Mammalian RNase H2 removes ribonucleotides from DNA to maintain genome integrity. J Exp Med. 2012;209:1419–1426. doi: 10.1084/jem.20120876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reijns MA, Rabe B, Rigby RE, et al. Enzymatic removal of ribonucleotides from DNA is essential for mammalian genome integrity and development. Cell. 2012;149:1008–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature. 2011;474:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nick McElhinny SA, Kumar D, Clark AB, et al. Genome instability due to ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:774–781. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nick McElhinny SA, Watts BE, Kumar D, et al. Abundant ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA by yeast replicative polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:4949–4954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914857107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ. RNase-sensitive DNA modification(s) initiates S. pombe mating-type switching. Genes Dev. 2004;18:794–804. doi: 10.1101/gad.289404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vengrova S, Dalgaard JZ. The wild-type Schizosaccharomyces pombe mat1 imprint consists of two ribonucleotides. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:59–65. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim N, Huang SN, Williams JS, et al. Mutagenic processing of ribonucleotides in DNA by yeast topoisomerase I. Science. 2011;332:1561–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1205016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Furuta T, Takemura H, Liao ZY, et al. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX and activation of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 in response to replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complexes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20303–20312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sekiguchi J, Shuman S. Site-specific ribonuclease activity of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I. Mol Cell. 1997;1:89–97. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.George CX, Samuel CE. Human RNA-specific adenosine deaminase ADAR1 transcripts possess alternative exon 1 structures that initiate from different promoters, one constitutively active and the other interferon inducible. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4621–4626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.George CX, Wagner MV, Samuel CE. Expression of interferon-inducible RNA adenosine deaminase ADAR1 during pathogen infection and mouse embryo development involves tissue-selective promoter utilization and alternative splicing. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:15020–15028. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500476200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.George CX, Das S, Samuel CE. Organization of the mouse RNA-specific adenosine deaminase Adar1 gene 5′-region and demonstration of STAT1-independent, STAT2-dependent transcriptional activation by interferon. Virology. 2008;380:338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.07.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Eckmann CR, Neunteufl A, Pfaffstetter L, Jantsch MF. The human but not the Xenopus RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 has an atypical nuclear localization signal and displays the characteristics of a shuttling protein. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:1911–1924. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.7.1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang Q, Khillan J, Gadue P, Nishikura K. Requirement of the RNA editing deaminase ADAR1 gene for embryonic erythropoiesis. Science. 2000;290:1765–1768. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang Q, Miyakoda M, Yang W, et al. Stress-induced apoptosis associated with null mutation of ADAR1 RNA editing deaminase gene. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:4952–4961. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310162200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hartner JC, Schmittwolf C, Kispert A, Muller AM, Higuchi M, Seeburg PH. Liver disintegration in the mouse embryo caused by deficiency in the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:4894–4902. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311347200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hartner JC, Walkley CR, Lu J, Orkin SH. ADAR1 is essential for the maintenance of hematopoiesis and suppression of interferon signaling. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:109–115. doi: 10.1038/ni.1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.XuFeng R, Boyer MJ, Shen H, et al. ADAR1 is required for hematopoietic progenitor cell survival via RNA editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17763–17768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903324106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Krasnoselskaya-Riz I, Spruill A, Chen YW, et al. Nuclear factor 90 mediates activation of the cellular antiviral expression cascade. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002;18:591–604. doi: 10.1089/088922202753747941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nie Y, Ding L, Kao PN, Braun R, Yang JH. ADAR1 interacts with NF90 through double-stranded RNA and regulates NF90-mediated gene expression independently of RNA editing. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:6956–6963. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.16.6956-6963.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Herbert A, Alfken J, Kim YG, Mian IS, Nishikura K, Rich A. A Z-DNA binding domain present in the human editing enzyme, double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8421–8426. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ward SV, George CX, Welch MJ, et al. RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase is a restriction factor for controlling measles virus replication that also is required for embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:331–336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017241108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Steinman RA, Wang Q. ADAR1 isoform involvement in embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105004108. author reply E200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Matthaei KI, Frese M, Hill CE. Is the p150 isoform of the RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase 1 really responsible for embryonic lethality? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100419108. ; author reply E44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yan N, Regalado-Magdos AD, Stiggelbout B, Lee-Kirsch MA, Lieberman J. The cytosolic exonuclease TREX1 inhibits the innate immune response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:1005–1013. doi: 10.1038/ni.1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Phuphuakrat A, Kraiwong R, Boonarkart C, Lauhakirti D, Lee TH, Auewarakul P. Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases enhance expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteins. J Virol. 2008;82:10864–10872. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00238-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Doria M, Neri F, Gallo A, Farace MG, Michienzi A. Editing of HIV-1 RNA by the double-stranded RNA deaminase ADAR1 stimulates viral infection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:5848–5858. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Biswas N, Wang T, Ding M, et al. ADAR1 is a novel multi targeted anti-HIV-1 cellular protein. Virology. 2012;422:265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Laguette N, Sobhian B, Casartelli N, et al. SAMHD1 is the dendritic- and myeloid-cell-specific HIV-1 restriction factor counteracted by Vpx. Nature. 2011;474:654–657. doi: 10.1038/nature10117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hrecka K, Hao C, Gierszewska M, et al. Vpx relieves inhibition of HIV-1 infection of macrophages mediated by the SAMHD1 protein. Nature. 2011;474:658–661. doi: 10.1038/nature10195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lahouassa H, Daddacha W, Hofmann H, et al. SAMHD1 restricts the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by depleting the intracellular pool of deoxynucleoside triphosphates. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:223–228. doi: 10.1038/ni.2236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Beck-Engeser GB, Eilat D, Wabl M. An autoimmune disease prevented by anti-retroviral drugs. Retrovirology. 2011;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-8-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:3507–3512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222878110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]