Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2010 Jul 5;20(4):308–312. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20090190

Trends in Disability-Free Life Expectancy in Japan, 1995–2004

Shuji Hashimoto 1, Miyuki Kawado 1, Rumi Seko 2, Yoshitaka Murakami 3, Masayuki Hayashi 4, Masahiro Kato 5, Tatsuya Noda 6, Toshiyuki Ojima 6, Masato Nagai 7, Ichiro Tsuji 7
PMCID: PMC3900791  PMID: 20530916

Abstract

Background

In Japan, life expectancy at birth is currently the highest in the world. However, recent trends in disability-free life expectancy in Japan have not been examined.

Methods

We used data from Japanese national surveys for the period 1995–2004. These surveys included information on activity status measured by common self-reported instruments. The numbers of expected years with and without activity limitation were estimated by using the Sullivan method.

Results

The numbers of expected years of life without activity limitation, at birth, in 1995 and 2004 were 68.5 and 69.7, respectively, in males and 72.1 and 73.0 in females. As a proportion of total life expectancy, at birth, these values represent a decrease from 89.7% to 88.6% in males and from 87.1% to 85.3% in females. The proportion of expected years with a limitation of some activities except activities of daily living (ADL) increased in males and females. The proportion of those with an ADL limitation increased in females, but not in males.

Conclusions

The trends in expected years with and without activity limitation suggest that the duration of life with a light or moderate disability increased in Japanese males and females during the period 1995–2004.

Key words: disability-free life expectancy, healthy life expectancy, health statistics

INTRODUCTION

Although life expectancy provides an estimate of average expected lifespan, health expectancy partitions total life expectancy into years free from health-related problems and years lived in ill-health.1,2 Two measures of health expectancy are widely used: disability-free life expectancy is defined as expected years of life without disability or activity limitation, and healthy life expectancy is based on self-rated health.1,3,4

The trends in disability-free life expectancy observed in several countries indicate that increases in total expected years of life are not necessarily accompanied by increases in the expected years of, or proportion of, active life.58 In Japan, life expectancy at birth is now the longest in the world, and continues to increase.911 Healthy life expectancy has been reported,12 but there have been no reports of recent trends in disability-free life expectancy, as determined using national survey data.1,13

In the present study, the expected years with and without activity limitation for the period 1995–2004 were estimated in Japanese by using data from national surveys that included information on activity status, as measured by common instruments.

METHODS

Data

We used data from life tables and the population in Japan during the period 1995–2004.10,11 Data on activity status for persons living at home were obtained from the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of the People on Health and Welfare of 1995, 1998, 2001, and 2004, which was a self-administered questionnaire survey distributed to more than 750 000 persons in households randomly selected nationwide.14

The data for patients admitted to hospitals and clinics were from the Patient Survey of 1996, 1999, 2002, and 2005, which was distributed to more than 3 000 000 patients who visited hospitals and clinics randomly selected throughout Japan.15 Before 1999, data for elder Japanese admitted to facilities for the health of older adults who need nursing care were obtained from the Survey on Health Service Facilities for the Aged, and data on elders admitted to welfare facilities for older adults who need nursing care were obtained from the Survey of Social Welfare Institutions. After 2000, both these datasets were collected from the Survey of Institutions and Establishments for Long-term Care.16

Activity limitation

The activity status for persons living at home was evaluated using responses to the questions: “Is your daily life now affected by health problems?” and “How is it affected?”.14 The second question was for persons replying “Yes” to the first question. The responses to the second question were “activities of daily living (ADL) (rising, dressing/undressing, eating, bathing, etc),” “going out,” “work, housework or schoolwork,” “physical exercise (included sport),” and “other.” We accordingly classified the responses into 3 levels of activity. A person replying “Yes” to the first question and “ADL” to the second was classified as having a limitation of ADL. A person replying “Yes” to the first question but not “ADL” to the second was classified as having a limitation of some activities except ADL. Respondents with other replies were classified as having no limitation of activities. Respondents admitted to hospitals, clinics, facilities for the elderly needing nursing care, and welfare facilities for the elderly requiring nursing care were considered to have a limitation of ADL.

Calculation of expected years with and without activity limitation

Using the abovementioned data, we calculated the sex- and age-specific prevalences of ADL limitation and limitation of some activities except ADL in 1995, 1998, 2001, and 2004. The age groups were 0 to 4, 5 to 9, …, 80 to 84, and 85 years or older. The prevalence of persons admitted to hospitals and clinics in these years was estimated from those in 1996, 1999, 2002 and 2005 using linear interpolation and extrapolation.

Using the Sullivan method,17 we divided the expected years of life in age group x (ex) into those with and without activity limitation, as follows:

ex=πyLy/lx+(1πy)Ly/lx

where represents the sum from age group x to the oldest age group in the age group of y, πy is the age-specific prevalence of activity limitation, Ly is stationary population, and lx is the number of survivors in the life table. Also, we divided the expected years of activity limitation into those due to ADL limitation and those due to a limitation of some activities except ADL.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the prevalence of activity limitation by sex and age group in 1995 and 2004. In those aged 0 to 64 years, the prevalence of no activity limitation per 1000 population ranged from 922 to 936 among males and females in 1995 and 2004. In those 65 years or older, the prevalence of no activity limitation decreased, and the prevalence of limitation of some activities except ADL increased, from 1995 to 2004 in males and females. The prevalence of ADL limitation increased in females, but not in males.

Table 1. Prevalences of activity limitation in Japanese, by sex and age group (1995 and 2004).

  Age

  <65 years ≥65 years


  1995 2004 1995 2004
Males        
 No activity limitation 936.4 931.7 730.3 711.5
 Limitation of some activities except ADL 39.7 46.5 125.5 144.1
 ADL limitation 24.0 21.7 144.2 144.4
  Prevalence of ADL limitation among people:        
   at home 16.3 15.7 95.6 96.7
   admitted to hospitals or clinics 7.6 5.9 39.1 35.4
   admitted to facilities for health of the elderly
​    who need nursing care
0.0 0.1 3.1 5.5
   admitted to welfare facilities for elderly
​    who need nursing care
0.1 0.0 6.5 6.8
 
Females        
 No activity limitation 930.7 921.6 697.1 667.6
 Limitation of some activities except ADL 45.2 54.4 136.6 143.9
 ADL limitation 24.2 24.0 166.3 188.5
  Prevalence of ADL limitation among people:        
   at home 18.1 19.2 101.6 117.0
   admitted to hospitals or clinics 6.0 4.7 42.9 38.2
   admitted to facilities for health of the elderly
​    who need nursing care
0.0 0.0 6.4 13.5
   admitted to welfare facilities for elderly
​    who need nursing care
0.1 0.0 15.4 19.7

Prevalence is per 1000 population.

ADL: activities of daily living.

Table 2 shows the expected years with and without activity limitation, at birth and at 65 years of age, in males and females in 1995–2004. The number of expected years without activity limitation, at birth, in males was 68.5 in 1995, and increased to 69.7 in 2004. From 1995 to 2004, the number of expected years with limitation of some activities except ADL, and the number of expected years with an ADL limitation, at birth, increased from 4.2 to 5.1 and from 3.7 to 3.9, respectively. The proportion of expected years without activity limitation to total life expectancy at birth decreased from 89.7% to 88.6%. The proportion of expected years with limitation of some activities except ADL increased, but the proportion of those with ADL limitation did not. The number of expected years without activity limitation, at age 65 years, in males was 16.5 in 1995, and increased to 18.2 in 2004. The proportion of those years to total life expectancy at age 65 years decreased from 70.7% to 68.2%.

Table 2. Expected years with and without activity limitation, at birth and age 65 years, in Japanese males and females (1995–2004).

      Life expectancy Expected years

without activity
limitation
with limitation of
some activities
except ADL
with ADL
limitation
Males At birth 1995 76.38 (100.0) 68.49 (89.7) 4.18 (5.5) 3.72 (4.9)
    1998 77.16 (100.0) 68.83 (89.2) 4.25 (5.5) 4.08 (5.3)
    2001 78.07 (100.0) 69.48 (89.0) 4.73 (6.1) 3.85 (4.9)
    2004 78.64 (100.0) 69.66 (88.6) 5.05 (6.4) 3.93 (5.0)
 
  At age 65 years 1995 16.48 (100.0) 11.64 (70.7) 2.13 (12.9) 2.70 (16.4)
    1998 17.13 (100.0) 11.86 (69.3) 2.25 (13.2) 3.01 (17.6)
    2001 17.78 (100.0) 12.44 (70.0) 2.39 (13.5) 2.95 (16.6)
    2004 18.21 (100.0) 12.42 (68.2) 2.69 (14.8) 3.10 (17.0)
 
Females At birth 1995 82.85 (100.0) 72.12 (87.1) 5.39 (6.5) 5.34 (6.4)
    1998 84.01 (100.0) 72.51 (86.3) 5.30 (6.3) 6.20 (7.4)
    2001 84.93 (100.0) 72.75 (85.7) 6.03 (7.1) 6.15 (7.2)
    2004 85.59 (100.0) 72.97 (85.3) 6.27 (7.3) 6.34 (7.4)
 
  At age 65 years 1995 20.94 (100.0) 13.85 (66.2) 2.89 (13.8) 4.20 (20.0)
    1998 21.96 (100.0) 14.18 (64.5) 2.80 (12.7) 4.99 (22.7)
    2001 22.68 (100.0) 14.47 (63.8) 3.10 (13.7) 5.11 (22.5)
    2004 23.28 (100.0) 14.67 (63.0) 3.30 (14.2) 5.31 (22.8)

Number of expected years as a proportion of life expectancy is shown as a percentage in parentheses.

ADL: activities of daily living.

The number of expected years without activity limitation, at birth, in females was 72.1 in 1995, and increased to 73.0 in 2004. From 1995 to 2004, the number of expected years with limitation of some activities except ADL, or with an ADL limitation, at birth, increased from 5.4 to 6.3 and from 5.3 to 6.3, respectively. The proportion of expected years without activity limitation to total life expectancy at birth decreased from 87.1% to 85.3%. The proportion of expected years with limitation of some activities except ADL and those with ADL limitation to total life expectancy both increased. The number of expected years without activity limitation, at age 65 years, in females was 20.9 in 1995, and increased to 23.3 in 2004. This represented a decrease from 66.2% to 63.0% of total life expectancy at age 65 years.

Figures 1 and 2 show the number of expected years with and without activity limitation by age group in males and females, respectively, in 2004. The number of expected years without activity limitation rapidly decreased with age, but not in those with an ADL limitation.

Figure 1. Number of expected years with and without activity limitation, by age, in Japanese males (2004).

Figure 1.

Figure 2. Number of expected years with and without activity limitation, by age, in Japanese females (2004).

Figure 2.

DISCUSSION

Life expectancy at birth in Japan is the longest in the world.9 In 2004, it was 78.6 years in males and 85.6 years in females.11 The aging population in Japan has increased substantially; the proportion of persons 65 years or older was 19.5% in 2004.10 Understanding the trends in disability-free life expectancy in such a population would prove useful for the discussion of means to assess population health.

This study presents a chronological series of the number of expected years of life with and without activity limitation in Japanese. From 1995 to 2004, the number of expected years without activity limitation, at birth, increased, and those years in persons with a limitation of some activities also increased. The proportion of the number of expected years without activity limitation to total life expectancy at birth decreased, and the proportion of expected years with a limitation of some activities except ADL increased. These results suggest that there was an increase in the duration of life with a light or moderate disability. An increase was reported after 1995 in the number of expected years lived in less-than-good self-rated health in Japan, as determined by observing trends in healthy life expectancy.12 Prolongation of the period of disability has been reported in some countries, while a decrease has been noted in others.68,18 We think that it is important to examine in more detail the factors related to these trends.1,19

In Japan, life expectancy is longer in females than in males. The proportion of expected years without activity limitation to total life expectancy was lower in females than in males in our population, as has been observed in many populations.9,19 During the period observed in our study, the life expectancy of females improved faster than that of males; however, the number of expected years of life without activity limitation increased more slowly among women than among males. The proportion of expected years with ADL limitation to total life expectancy at birth increased in females but not in males, which suggests that prolongation of severe disability might occur in females but not in males. Our study provides no information on the factors related to these sex differences.20

There were some limitations in the present study. We used data from representative national surveys in Japan.10,11,1416 Although activity status in these surveys was measured in persons living at home by common instruments,14 it was self-reported and not comparable with measurements in previous studies.68 We used data for persons admitted to hospitals, clinics, facilities for the elderly needing nursing care, and welfare facilities for the elderly requiring nursing care; however, we did not include data for persons admitted to other facilities. We used the Sullivan method based on cross-sectional data to estimate the number of expected years with and without activity limitation. It would be useful to estimate these values using a multistate life table method based on longitudinal data.21 Unfortunately, these data are not available for a national representative population in many countries, including Japan. We did not estimate the standard errors of the expected years with and without activity limitation. To evaluate these parameters based on data from small samples, it would be necessary to consider their standard errors.1 The data used encompassed the 9-year period from 1995 to 2004. Observation over a longer period might be better for assessing trends in disability-free life expectancy.1 We observed the number of expected years with and without activity limitation in Japan. Comparison of our results with those from other populations should yield important information.1,19

In conclusion, the trends in the number of expected years with and without activity limitation suggest that, in Japanese males and females, the duration of life with light or moderate disability increased during the period from 1995–2004.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular and Lifestyle-Related Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Masato Nagai is a recipient of a Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Robine JM, Jaggar C, Mathers CD, Crimmins EM, Suzman RM, editors. Determining Health Expectancies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mathers CD , Iburg KM , Salomon JA , Tandon A , Chatterji S , Ustün B , et al. Global patterns of healthy life expectancy in the year 2002 . BMC Public Health. 2004;4:66 10.1186/1471-2458-4-66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smith M , Edgar G , Groom G. Health expectancies in the United Kingdom, 2004–06 . Health Stat Q. 2008. Winter;(40):77–80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Molla MT, Madans JH, Wagener DK, Crimmins EM. Summary measures of population health: Report of findings on methodologic and data issues. US National Center for Health Statistics. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fries JF Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity . N Engl J Med. 1980;303:130–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Verbrugge LM Longer life but worsening health? Trends in health and mortality of middle-aged and older persons . Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984;62:475–519 10.2307/3349861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crimmins EM , Saito Y , Ingegneri D. Trends in disability-free life expectancy in the United States, 1970–90 . Popul Dev Rev. 1997;23:555–72 10.2307/2137572 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fries JF Measuring and monitoring success in compressing morbidity . Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:455–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2009. Genova: World Health Organization; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Statistical Abstracts on Health and Welfare in Japan 2008. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Abridged Life Tables For Japan 2007. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2008 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yong V , Saito Y. Trends in healthy life expectancy in Japan: 1986–2004 . Demogr Res. 2009;20:467–94 10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsuji I , Minami Y , Fukao A , Hisamichi S , Asano H , Sato M. Active life expectancy among elderly Japanese . J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M173–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions of the People on Health and Welfare 2004. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2006 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Patient Survey 2005. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2007 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Survey of Institutions and Establishments for Long-term Care 2004. Tokyo: Health and Welfare Statistics Association; 2006 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sullivan DF A single index of mortality and morbidity . HSMHA Health Rep. 1971;86:347–54 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sagardui-Villamor J , Guallar-Castillón P , García-Ferruelo M , Banegas JR , Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Trends in disability and disability-free life expectancy among elderly people in Spain: 1986–1999 . J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:1028–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jagger C , Gillies C , Moscone F , Cambois E , Van Oyen H , Nusselder W , et al. ; EHLEIS team . Inequalities in healthy life years in the 25 countries of the European Union in 2005: a cross-national meta-regression analysis . Lancet. 2008;372:2124–31 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61594-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Crimmins EM , Saito Y. Trends in healthy life expectancy in the United States, 1970–1990: gender, racial, and educational differences . Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1629–41 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00273-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rogers A , Rogers RG , Belanger A. Longer life but worse health? Measurement and dynamics . Gerontologist. 1990;30:640–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES