Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e86168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086168

Zinc Mono-Therapy in Pre-Symptomatic Chinese Children with Wilson Disease: A Single Center, Retrospective Study

Kuerbanjiang Abuduxikuer 1, Jian-She Wang 2,*
Editor: Imti Choonara3
PMCID: PMC3901685  PMID: 24475083

Abstract

Background

There is no official consensus regarding zinc therapy in pre-symptomatic children with Wilson Disease (WD); more data is needed.

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of zinc gluconate therapy for Chinese children with pre-symptomatic WD.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed pre-symptomatic children receiving zinc gluconate in a single Chinese center specialized in pediatric hepatology. Short-term follow-up data on safety and efficacy were presented, and effects of different zinc dosages were compared.

Results

30 children (21 males) aged 2.7 to 16.8 years were followed for up to 4.4 years; 26 (87%) children had abnormal ALT at baseline. Most patients (73%) received higher than the currently recommended dose of elemental zinc. Zinc gluconate significantly reduced mean ALT (p<0.0001), AST (p<0.0001), GGT (p<0.0001) levels after 1 month, and urinary copper excretion after 6 months (p<0.0054). Mean direct bilirubin levels dropped significantly at 1 month (p = 0.0175), 3 months (p = 0.0010), and 6 months (p = 0.0036). Serum zinc levels gradually increased and reached a significantly higher level after 6 months (p<0.0026), reflecting good compliance with the therapy. Complete blood count parameters did not change throughout the analysis period. 8 children experienced mild and transient gastrointestinal side effects. The higher zinc dose did not affect treatment response and was not associated with different or increased side effects when compared to conventional zinc dose.

Conclusion

In our cohort, zinc gluconate therapy for Chinese children with pre-symptomatic WD was effective, and higher initial dose of elemental zinc had the same level of efficacy as the conventional dose.

Introduction

Wilson disease (WD) is an inborn error of copper metabolism characterized by impaired hepatocellular utilization and biliary excretion of copper. This leads to copper accumulation in the liver, brain, cornea, kidney, and other organs, eventually causing end stage liver disease and severe brain damage [1]. It is caused by autosomal recessive mutations in the ATP7B gene [2]. WD has worldwide incidence of 1/35,000–1/100,000 [3], but the exact incidence in China is not published.

A diagnostic scoring system using clinical findings, lab results, liver biopsy, and mutation analysis was developed by the working party of 8th International Meeting on Wilson Disease and Menkes Disease [4], when this was validated in children it had a high sensitivity (98.14%) and specificity (96.59%) [5].

Current treatment regiments include copper-chelators, and zinc salts. The goal of therapy for all patients is to establish, and maintain normal copper homeostasis. This can be achieved with medical therapy or, if rescue treatment fails and in advanced cases, liver transplantation. Treatment of WD can generally prevent, stabilize, or reverse copper overload and symptoms caused by it. Early diagnosis is important, because treatment of the disease is more effective, if initiated at an early stage [6].

The latest European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines [7] recommended zinc for pre-symptomatic patients while acknowledging its role in patients with neurological manifestation. The American Association for Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) [8] also recommended using zinc for the treatment of pre-symptomatic patients or those on maintenance therapy. Routine follow-up and monitoring of liver function, parameters of copper/zinc metabolism, international normalized ratio, complete blood count, and urinalysis was recommended [9], [10].

A recent systematic review [11] on the treatment of WD found only four qualified studies evaluating zinc mono-therapy [12][15], and two studies comparing the efficacy of zinc and penicillamine [16], [17]. Based on limited data, the authors recommended zinc mono-therapy to pre-symptomatic WD patients while waiting for larger, randomized controlled studies. However, both guidelines and the systematic review failed to issue specific recommendation for pediatric patients. More data on treatment is needed for children, especially at pre-symptomatic stage.

With the introduction of gene sequencing technology, an increasing number of Chinese children with WD are being diagnosed before symptoms occur [15]. From 2006, our institution adopted zinc mono-therapy as the first-line treatment for pre-symptomatic children with WD. Here we report a retrospective analysis of 30 pre-symptomatic WD children that received zinc mono-therapy from a single pediatric liver center.

Clinical Setting, Patients and Methods

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Children's Hospital of Fudan University is one of the major pediatric tertiary health care centers in China, and mainly receives referrals from the eastern region of the country. Recently, more and more patients all across China are coming to the Liver Center for diagnosis and treatment.

Medical records of children with WD treated on an outpatient basis by one liver specialist (Professor Wang JS) in Children's Hospital of Fudan University from January 2006 to March 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The Institutional Review Board in Children's Hospital of Fudan University approved this study and waived the need for parental informed consent for children's clinical data to be used for retrospective analysis.

WD Scores were calculated for each child (aged less than 18 years at the time of first visit) using serum ceruloplasmin levels, urinary copper levels, presence/absence of Kayser-Fleischer (K-F) ring, and mutation analysis of ATP7B gene [4]. WD Scores of 4 or above were considered diagnostic of WD. ATP7B gene mutation analysis was done at the time of diagnosis by Sanger sequencing of DNA extracted from peripheral white blood cells.

Patients were regarded as pre-symptomatic if diagnosed after accidental findings of abnormal liver enzymes, or by family screening after an index patient was confirmed. Children included in this analysis were newly diagnosed, and had baseline data plus at least one follow-up data point. Neurologic manifestations and other causes of liver, muscular, and metabolic diseases were excluded with appropriate investigations. Patients with insufficient data, neurologic/psychiatric symptoms, liver failure, and those who received chelation or combination therapy prior to zinc mono-therapy were excluded from this study.

Data Collection and Analysis

We recorded baseline characteristics for all included cases, including age, gender, presence/absence of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and K-F rings. Liver function test results, serum ceruloplasmin/copper/zinc levels, complete blood count, urinary copper levels, urinary analysis, ATP7B gene mutations, and initial zinc dosage were collected at the start of zinc therapy. Available follow-up data were collected at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after the start of zinc therapy, and every 6 months thereafter. Follow-up clinical and laboratory data were compared to baseline data for analyzing the efficacy, and safety of zinc therapy.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with STATA software (version 12.0 Special Edition, STATA Corp, College Station, TX). The Pearson chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, and Fisher's exact values were calculated when expected frequency was five or less. A two independent samples t-test was used to compare continuous variable. Differences between paired data were calculated using a paired t-test. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A search of out-patient records from January 2006 to March 2013 revealed 49 patients with WD. We excluded 9 patients (cases 31 through 39) for lack of follow-up data either because they were lost to follow-up, or transferred to local care. 5 cases (cases 40–44) were older than 18 years at first visit and were not included in the analysis. Three children (cases 45–47) were excluded for previously receiving chelation/combination therapy, one (case 48) for having epilepsy and hand tremor plus chelation therapy, and one (case 49) for having liver de-compensation at presentation. This patient with liver de-compensation had marked jaundice (total bilirubin level: 136 umol/L), liver cirrhosis with severe splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia, but the albumin level was normal. Basic characteristics of all included and excluded cases were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Basic Characteristics of Included WD Children At the Start of Zinc Therapy (Cases 1–30), and Cases Excluded From the Analysis (Cases 31–49).

Case No Sex Age (Year) Total Follow-up Time (Year) Wilson Disease Score ALT (IU/L) AST (IU/L) Hepatomegaly Splenomegaly Palmar Erythema Specific Mutations and/or Amino Acid Changes (**Homozygous, *Heterozygous, ∼Parental Origins Confirmed, Bold: Novel Mutation) Initial Zinc Dose (mg) (Bold: higher than conventional dose)
Ceruloplasmin Urinary Copper K-F Ring Mutation Total Score
1 M 2.7 4.4 2 2 0 NA 4 420 254 + + NA 210
2 M 6.6 3.7 2 2 0 NA 4 221 211 + NA 100
3 F 5.9 3.7 2 2 0 NA 4 214 219 + NA 100
4 F 4.3 2.8 2 2 0 4 8 207 183 *c.2924C>A, p.Ser975Tyr/*c.3443T>C,p.Ile1148Thr 90
5 M 7.3 2.6 2 2 0 1 5 140 154 *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu 150
6 M 3.1 2.6 2 2 0 4 8 291 229 + *c.2975C>T,p.Pro992Leu/*c.3809A>G,p.Asn1270Ser 150
7 M 3.2 2.5 2 1 0 4 7 7 14 + + ∼*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/∼*c.3316G>A,p.Val1106Ile 90
8 M 4.3 2.4 2 2 0 4 8 124 76 + + **c.2333G>T, p.Arg778Leu 150
9 M 5.8 1.8 2 2 0 4 8 241 153 *c.2145C>A,p.Tyr715Stop/*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu 60
10 M 6.9 1.5 2 2 0 4 8 223 118 + **c.2304dupC,p.Met769HisfsX26 80
11 F 3.7 1.4 2 2 2 4 10 87 62 + *c.2804C>T, p.Thr935Met/*c.2975C>T,p.Pro992Leu 90
12 F 3.6 1.3 2 2 0 4 8 289 197 ∼**c.2333G>T, p.Arg778Leu 90
13 M 4.3 1.3 2 2 0 4 8 254 116 *c.2755C>G, p.Arg919Gly/*c.4013T>G,p.Ile1338Ser 150
14 M 3.9 1.4 2 2 0 4 8 163 125 + ∼*c.2333G>T, p.Arg778Leu/∼*c.2804C>T, p.Thr935Met 90
15 F 12.6 1.3 2 2 0 4 8 111 47 + ∼*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/∼*c.2828G>A,p.Gly943Asp 90
16 M 11.7 0.8 2 2 0 NA 4 389 175 NA 90
17 M 8.9 1.0 2 2 0 NA 4 93 71 + + NA 150
18 M 9.8 1.0 2 1 0 1 4 54 40 + + *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu 150
19 M 6.1 1.0 2 2 0 4 8 270 144 + + *c.1543+1G>T/*c.3041C>T,p.Pro1014Leu 150
20 F 4.3 0.9 2 2 0 4 8 197 121 + **c.3517G>A,p.Glu1173Lys 150
21 M 8.5 1.3 2 2 0 NA 4 72 40 NA 150
22 M 4.8 0.8 2 2 0 4 8 88 131 + + *c.2078C>G,p.Ser693Cys/*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu 150
23 M 4.8 0.8 2 2 0 4 8 86 63 *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/*c.2333G>A,p.Arg778Gln 90
24 F 6.8 0.7 2 2 0 4 8 124 94 + *c.2122-1G>T/*c.3044T>C,p.Leu1015Pro 150
25 F 3.5 0.6 2 2 0 4 8 360 213 + + **c.3446G>A, p.Gly1149Glu 90
26 M 8.8 0.6 2 2 0 4 8 163 92 + *c.2755C>G,p.Arg919Gly/*c.1153G>T,p.Glu385Unk 150
27 M 5.8 0.6 2 2 0 4 8 364 167 + *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/*c.2975C>T,p.Pro992Leu 150
28 M 15.7 0.7 2 2 0 4 8 148 75 *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/*c.2383C>T,p.Leu795Phe 150
29 F 16.8 0.3 2 2 0 4 8 50 31 + **c.2906G>A,p.Arg969Gln 90
30 M 3.5 0.4 2 2 0 4 8 106 63 *c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/*c.2145C>A,p.Tyr715Stop 90
31 F 10.2 3.7 2 2 0 NA 4 169 145 NA NA
32 F 7.7 3.6 2 2 0 4 8 53 63 + *c.2804C>T, p.Thr935Met/*c.3809A>G, p.Asn1270Ser 60
33 F 2.5 2.8 2 NA NA 4 6 393 213 *c.2333G>T, p.Arg778Leu/*c.2975C>T, p.Pro992Leu 100
34 F 12.3 1.8 2 2 NA NA 4 24 38 + + NA NA
35 M NA 1.7 2 2 0 NA 4 88 47 + NA NA
36 M 4.3 0.8 2 2 NA 4 8 36 24 + *c.2333G>T, p.Arg778Leu/*c.2621C>T, p.Ala874Va None
37 F 5.3 0.8 2 2 0 NA 4 8 17 + NA NA
38 M 3.0 0.8 2 2 0 4 8 142 70 + *c.4114C>T, p.Gln1372Stop/*c.2621C>T,p.Ala874Va NA
39 F 3.7 0.6 2 2 0 4 8 202 122 *c.2187G>T, p.Met729Ile/*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Leu/*c.2975C>T, p.Pro992Leu NA
40 F 22 NA 2 2 0 0 4 218 98 + Normal NA
41 F 19.8 1.1 2 0 0 4 6 73 75 *c.2804C>T, p.Thr935Met/*c.2333G>T,p.Arg778Le 150
42 M 21.2 1.3 2 2 0 2 6 63 78 *c.2975C>T, p.Pro992Leu 90
43 M 35.5 0.9 2 2 0 0 4 NA NA NA NA NA Normal None
44 M 40.5 0.9 2 2 NA 2 6 110 144 NA NA NA *c.3660-3664insG, p.D1222GfsX36 None
45 F 5.7 6.6 2 2 0 NA 4 396 143 + + NA 50
46 F 9.5 1.6 2 2 2 NA 6 52 27 + NA None
47 F 13.7 3.6 2 2 0 NA 4 68 53 + NA None
48 F 13.6 5.4 2 2 2 NA 6 24 22 NA 60
49 M 15.8 0.8 2 2 NA NA 4 28 28 + + Normal NA

NA: Not Available.

Consequently, a total of 30 pre-symptomatic pediatric patients were analyzed, and all children had a Wilson Disease Score of 4, or higher. There were 21 males (70%), the mean age at presentation was 6.6 years old (range 2.7–16.8 years), and mean follow-up time was 1.54 years (range 0.3–4.4 years). 17 (57%) children had hepatomegaly, 9 (30%) had palmar erythema, 2 (7%) had splenomegaly, and 1 (3%) was found to have K-F ring after ophthalmological examination. 26 (87%) patients had abnormal alanine amino transferase (ALT) levels (greater than 2-times of upper normal limit) at presentation, while 4 others had normal liver function tests.

Sanger sequencing of ATP7B established variants believed to be disease causing in 24 patients. 6 had homozygous mutations, 16 had compound heterozygous mutations, and 2 had only one heterozygous mutation. Parental origins of mutations were confirmed in 1 patient with homozygous mutation, and in 3 children with 2 compound heterozygous mutations (Table 1). 5 variants previously not reported in the Wilson Disease Mutation Database (http://www.wilsondisease.med.ualberta.ca) include 1 homozygous (c.3446G>A), and 4 heterozygous (c.1153G>T, c.3041C>T, c.3044T>C, c.4013T>G) missense mutations (lead to amino acid change). All of these variants were predicted to be disease causing by Mutation Taster (www.mutationtaster.org) and are not seen in over 10,000 US alleles (evs.g.s.washington.edu, accessed 24 Oct 2013). Results of mutation analysis for the remaining 6 children were not recorded in their charts.

Zinc Therapy

A domestically produced zinc gluconate tablet containing 10 mg of elemental zinc each were used for all patients. A different dose was used for different patients according to their age, liver enzyme levels, degree of hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, predicted gastrointestinal tolerance, and parental concerns. The zinc dose was increased in some patients if their laboratory parameters were not responsive to treatment, or an ALT re-elevation occurred after treatment response. In other patients it was reduced if not tolerated, and then slowly increased to the target dose. Our lowest initial dosage was 30 mg of elemental zinc twice daily, while the highest dosage was 70 mg of elemental zinc three times a day. Only a few children received twice a day dosing due to school attendance. Total daily dosages of elemental zinc given initially were also provided in Table 1. In accordance with published recommendations of zinc dosage in children [12], two groups of patients were identified: “conventional zinc dose” group consisted of children older than 5 years of age who received 100 mg or less daily zinc, although a 15.7 year old adolescent received 150 mg/day zinc and was also included in this group; the “higher zinc dose” group consisted of those less than 5 years who received 90 mg/day or more, and 5–10 year olds who received 150 mg/day or more. Twenty two (73%) children received higher zinc dose, while eight (27%) received conventional dose.

Treatment Outcome

Of 26 (87%) patients with an abnormal ALT levels at baseline, the cumulative number of children with ALT normalization after 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of zinc therapy were 17, 19, and 19 respectively. This normalization was maintained for the duration of the study data points available. A further five children achieved liver enzyme normalization after 1 year but before 2 years of therapy. The remaining 2 children have not normalized at their one year follow up. Of 4 patients with normal ALT at first presentation, 2 remained normal under zinc therapy, 1 child had recurrent abnormalities, while the remaining one had an abnormal ALT at 1 month and returned to normal at 6 month.

We compared the number of children with normal ALT levels between the conventional zinc dose group and the high zinc dose group at each of the follow-up time points. No statistically significant differences were observed at all follow-up time-points; higher zinc dose achieved the same proportion of children with normal ALT levels as the conventional zinc dose (Table 2).

Table 2. Number of Children with Normal and Abnormal ALT, Comparison of Different Zinc Doses at Each Time Point.

Number of Children (with normal ALT/with abnormal ALT)
1st Visit 1 Month 3 Months 6 Month 1 Year 1.5 Years 2 Years
Conventional Dose 1/7 6/2 6/1 4/2 4/0 2/1 2/0
Higher Dose 3/19 15/7 13/4 8/5 5/4 1/4 2/0
P value 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.228 0.464 na

na: not applicable.

Patients were regarded as having a quick response to zinc therapy if their liver enzymes dropped to normal levels at 6 moths and remained so afterwards, or liver enzymes remained normal if the child initially presented with normal liver function. In total, 21 patients were categorized as having a quick response. On the other hand, patients were regarded as having slow or no response if ALT levels remained high at 6 months or were normal in the first six months but became abnormal at any time after that. 9 children fulfilled the criteria of slow/no response. The treatment outcome was not associated with age, gender, initial ALT/AST (Aspartate Amino Transferase) levels, presence of other abnormal findings (hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, K-F ring, and palmar erythema), or the initial zinc dose (Table 3).

Table 3. Treatment outcome and its' Association with Baseline Characteristics.

Treatment Outcome Mean Age (Year) Male (n) ALT (IU/L) AST (IU/L) Presence of Hepatomegaly (n) Presence of Splenomegaly (n) Presence of Palmar Erythema (n) Presence of K-F Ring (n) High Zinc Dose (n) Mean Elemental Zinc (mg)/Day
Quick Response (n = 21) 6.6 14 166 115 12 2 4 1 16 117
Slow/No Response (n = 9) 6.6 7 228 140 5 0 5 0 6 130
P Value 0.99 0.68 0.16 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.67 0.39

We compared liver function test results, serum copper/zinc levels, urinary copper levels, and complete blood counts at each follow-up to the baseline data using paired t-test. Data after 2 years of follow-up were not analyzed due to insufficient sample size. Results of statistical analysis are provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Figure 1. Parameters of Liver function.

Figure 1

Linear plot of mean values of liver function parameters at each visit, with number of observations, and p value from paired t-test results with the 1st visit. A: Serum ALT and AST levels. B: Serum ALP and GGT levels. C: Serum total and direct bilirubin levels. D: Serum albumin and total bile acid levels.

Figure 2. Parameters of copper/zinc metabolism and complete blood count.

Figure 2

Linear plot of mean values at each visit with number of observations and p value from paired t-test results with the 1st visit. A: Serum copper and zinc Levels. B: Urinary copper levels. C: White/red blood cell counts. D: Hemoglobin level and platelet counts.

After 1 month of zinc therapy, the mean serum ALT (p<0.0001), AST (p<0.0001) and Gamma Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT) (p<0.0001) levels dropped significantly and remained lower throughout analysis period. However, serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) levels gradually increased after zinc therapy and were significantly higher at 1 month (p = 0.04), 3 months (p = 0.0016), 6 months (p = 0.03), and 1 year (p = 0.0048). Values were not statistically significant beyond 1 year, probably due to a small sample size. There were no statistically significant changes in total bilirubin, serum albumin, and total bile acid levels throughout the follow-up period. Mean direct bilirubin levels remained within normal limits at all time points, but, dropped significantly at 1 month (p = 0.0175), 3 months (p = 0.0010), and 6 months (p = 0.0036), returning to the same level as the baseline at 1 year and thereafter (Figure 1).

Serum copper levels remained constant during the treatment period; however, serum zinc levels gradually increased after zinc therapy with a statistically significant increase at 6 months (p = 0.0026) and 1 year (p = 0.0267), indicating good compliance with zinc therapy. Urine copper concentration and 24-hour urine copper excretion dropped after zinc therapy, but did not reach significantly lower levels until 6 months (p = 0.0054 and 0.0349 respectively). Complete blood count parameters including white blood cell counts, red blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and platelet counts did not change after the start of zinc therapy and remained constant until 2 years of follow-up (Figure 2).

Effect of Different Zinc Doses on Lab Parameters

Lab parameters of patients receiving the conventional zinc dose (n = 8) or high zinc dose (n = 22) were compared at various time points of follow-up. Mean values of the liver function test, copper/zinc metabolism, and complete blood count parameters are shown in Table 4. P values of t-test results are provided for each parameter at each visit. Changes in mean serum ALT, AST, and albumin levels (ALB), white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) counts, serum copper (Scu), serum zinc (Szn), urinary copper (Ucu), and 24-hour urine copper levels (24HUcu) were not statistically different when comparing different zinc-dose groups. Mean levels of total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), ALP, and hemoglobulin (Hb) were significantly different at the start of zinc therapy (p = 0.011, 0.003, 0.015, and 0.01 respectively), but these differences disappeared later during the follow-up. AST levels at 2-year follow-up were different according to zinc dose (p = 0.02). At 1-month follow-up, mean platelet (PLT) level was significantly lower in high dose group when compared with conventional dose group (p = 0.0228), but this difference disappeared in later follow-up comparisons. Mean values of WBC, RBC, and Hb levels did not differ with different doses of zinc therapy.

Table 4. Effect of Zinc Dose on Liver Function, Copper Metabolism, and Complete Blood Count at Different stages of Follow-up.

Time of Follow-up Zinc Dose Liver Function Copper/Zinc Metabolism Complete Blood Count
ALT AST GGT TB DB ALP ALB Scu Szn Ucu 24HUcu WBC RBC HB PLT
Start of Zinc Therapy Normal 200 129 96 11.2 3.9 216 44 11.5 81 5.5 0.51 6.9 5.1 150 254
High 180 120 79 7.7 2.4 333 43.5 12.9 78 8 0.44 8.1 4.7 129 319
P Value 0.668 0.772 0.367 0.011 0.003 0.015 0.66 0.428 0.615 0.2549 0.7693 0.544 0.164 0.01 0.447
1 Month Normal 61 43 63 9.9 2.46 416 44.4 14.1 67 3.1 0.27 7.4 4.6 127 440
High 68 47 42 6.8 1.96 386 42.7 12.3 93 4.4 0.27 8.5 4.8 128 309
P Value 0.77 0.705 0.101 0.038 0.0803 0.641 0.139 0.422 0.196 0.1202 0.9821 0.436 0.403 0.969 0.02
3 Month Normal 53 33 24 8.6 2.44 356 44.1 11.8 101 1.7 0.11 8.6 4.9 132 287
High 59 38 30 7.2 1.82 429 44.2 15 91 3.6 0.13 8.4 5 131 305
P Value 0.776 0.594 0.559 0.401 0.1427 0.386 0.967 0.22 0.295 0.085 0.7958 0.886 0.554 0.828 0.558
6 Month Normal 51 35 25 9.5 2.25 328 45.7 15.2 122 3.3 0.17 8.9 5.3 139 296
High 58 40 25 6.5 1.68 431 44.3 13.9 105 3.8 0.12 8.5 4.9 128 295
P Value 0.701 0.45 0.939 0.119 0.2478 0.315 0.18 0.716 0.25 0.7691 0.6183 0.815 0.118 0.129 0.976
1 Year Normal 39 25 26 8.8 2.25 407 43.9 11.8 101 4.7 0.31 6.9 4.8 127 308
High 76 49 25 8 2.73 481 45 11.8 118 3.7 0.19 7.8 4.5 126 271
P Value 0.251 0.152 0.977 0.835 0.6313 0.443 0.498 0.998 0.306 0.2806 0.2666 0.468 0.58 0.911 0.55
1.5 Year Normal 54 31 17 10.4 2.8 445 45 18.8 105 na 0.27 8.1 na 133 319
High 61 46 23 9.8 1.44 449 46.6 17.2 105 na 0.04 8.6 na 122 281
P Value 0.811 0.404 0.57 0.86 0.1604 0.967 0.526 na na na na 0.71 na 0.324 0.582
2 Year Normal 35 20 17 11.5 4.4 507 44 10.1 94 na na 9.2 na na na
High 32 25 21 3.4 1.3 435 45.5 12.5 114 na na 7.3 na na na
P Value 0.877 0.02 0.578 0.388 0.2679 0.332 0.36 na na na na na na na na

na: not applicable due to lack of data to perform t-test. Abbreviations were provided within the text, and units for each parameter were provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Zinc Toxicity

One 16 year-old girl stopped taking her medicine after experiencing fever and diarrhea several days after initiating zinc therapy at 30 mg 3-times-a-day. She had been identified through family screening, and had normal liver function at presentation. Her liver enzymes remained normal, and she was able to re-start the therapy after one month without any further adverse events. 3 other children experienced mild abdominal discomfort and occasional vomiting, 4 patients had mild abdominal or epi-gastric pain/discomfort. One of these individuals, a 6 year-old girl, was switched to penicillamine, after 3 years of zinc therapy, due to recurrent ALT elevations. The other 3 patients were able to continue zinc therapy despite mild and occasional gastrointestinal problems. Overall, 8 out of 30 (26.7%) children experienced mild gastrointestinal side effects of zinc. Side effects occurred in 3 out of 8 children with conventional zinc dose and 5 out of 22 children with high zinc dose, and occurrence rate wasn't significantly different (p = 0.643).

Zinc treatment did not affect complete blood count parameters throughout the study period. All patients had regular urine analysis. 2 children experienced a mild and transient hematuria (occult blood and red blood cells in urine), no other abnormalities such as persistent hematuria or proteinuria, were observed.

Discussion

In the 1960s, doctors in Holland started using zinc in a patient with WD and achieved a clinical response in 1.5 years [18]. Later research further illustrated the mechanisms of action [19][23]. In previous researches, the dose of elemental zinc for children with WD was determined by age and body weight: 25 mg twice daily if aged 1 to 5 years; 25 mg three time a day if aged 6 to 15 years and body weight is under 125 pounds; 50 mg three times a day if aged 16 years or older [12], [24], [25].

In our single center sample of pre-symptomatic children with WD, most had elevated liver enzymes. It might be reasonable to predict that a higher zinc dose will take less time to achieve treatment goals while producing more side effects. However, our comparison of the number of children with a normal ALT at each time point of follow-up did not reveal any differences between higher zinc dose and conventional zinc dose groups (Table 2). Children in conventional zinc dose group achieved the same rate of quick response as the children in the high zinc dose group (Table 3). No significant dose related difference was observed when comparing the occurrence of gastrointestinal side effects. At different time points of follow-up, the major parameters of liver function, copper/zinc metabolism, and complete blood count did not significantly differ between high and conventional zinc dosage groups with the exception of mean PLT levels at 1 month. However this difference disappeared at subsequent time points (Table 4).

Due to lower body weight and less copper accumulation prior to treatment, Brewer et al. warned against the possibility of over-treating younger children with zinc. They recommended 25 mg of elemental zinc twice daily for children under the age of 5, and 25 mg three times daily for patients aged between 5 and 15 years [12], [25]. Although zinc has an excellent profile with a low incidence of side effects, better efficacy, and low cost, one must be cautious that rare, and severe complications [26][29] might occur and regularly check clinical and biochemical parameters, while keeping in mind potential mechanisms of zinc toxicity [30], [31]. In our group, most children received higher than the conventional dose of molecular zinc (22 out of 30). This might explain the reason why more children (8 out of 30, 26.7%) experienced mild gastrointestinal side effects than Brewer et al reported (4 out of 34, 11.76%) [24]. However, our patients with higher zinc dosage did not experience any serious complications, significant increase of side effects, or treatment failure compared to children receiving conventional zinc dose.

Presence of palmar erythema tended to be associated with slow/no response, but the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). A larger sample size in future studies should be evaluated to see if there is a significant relationship (Table 3).

Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan et al. [32] reported serum ALP changes in WD patients treated with zinc, ALP was elevated above the normal range after a few weeks of zinc therapy and stabilized at the higher end of normal range after 1 year. In our study, mean serum ALP levels gradually increased after zinc therapy, and were significantly higher than baseline at 1 month all the way through the first year, but the statistical significance was lost later (Figure 1). One should also bear in mind that isolated ALP elevation while all other liver function parameters were improving or stable raises the possibility that ALP might originate from bone. Sadighiet al [33] reported that zinc supplementation stimulates bone growth/fracture healing and increases serum ALP level.

Although the mean direct bilirubin level at the first presentation was normal, it dropped significantly after 1 month of zinc treatment, and remained so until 1 year. (Figure 1). Linn [34] administered zinc for 12 WD patients with hepatic manifestation and noted a decrease in bilirubin levels. Other studies with children mentioned serum bilirubin levels remained normal or stable during zinc therapy [24], [35]. In reviewing the literature, we were unable to find previous studies of pre-symptomatic children that document direct bilirubin changes during zinc treatment. It is interesting to note that even a small but significant reduction in mean direct bilirubin levels accompanied improvement of liver enzymes. Our finding of a significant decrease in direct bilirubin levels after zinc therapy in pre-symptomatic WD children needs to be confirmed by future studies, and its significance in evaluating treatment response awaits elucidation.

Brewer reported significant increase in both serum and urinary zinc levels 1 year after zinc mono-therapy in children (p = 0.0001) [24]. The mean serum zinc level in our cohort started to increase after zinc therapy, and was statistically significantly higher than the baseline level at 6 months and 1 year (p = 0.0026 and 0.0267 respectively) (Figure 2). This indicated good compliance among WD patients, as the vast majority of children were receiving the prescribed dose when checked at each visit. The Brewer study compared both plasma and urine copper at baseline to 1 year after zinc mono-therapy in pediatric patients, both parameters dropped significantly (p = 0.022 and 0.0001 respectively) [24]. In our study, both urine copper concentration and 24 urine copper quantification values dropped at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.03 and 0.005). Conversely, mean serum copper levels failed to change throughout the study period (p = 0.8 at 1 year follow-up) (Figure 2). This lack of detectable change might be related to methodological limitations for measuring serum copper levels in our institution. Specifically, changes in free copper might not be detected due to the fact that majority of serum copper is bound to ceruloplasmin.

Study Limitations

The main limitation of this study was that it was a retrospective, non-randomised cohort of children treated with different doses of zinc. The study follow up time is significantly shorter than several other studies (mean 1.54 years, range 0.3–4.4 years). However, we have chosen to publish this interim data now to ensure rapid availability to the academic community of our experience with high dose of zinc gluconate therapy. This seems an appropriate time point because we have studied a large enough group of patients to detect any large safety signals and further longitudinal follow up of this cohort is unlikely to lead to further safety signals as the majority of these cases have entered the maintenance therapy phase, where doses are at the same level as previous trials.

We evaluated efficacy based on intention to treat of the initial zinc dose in our cohort of patients. In routine clinical practice, zinc doses were dynamically adjusted according to tolerance and liver enzyme changes. We attempted to collect intermediate and final zinc dose data, but the collected data was inadequate for statistical analysis. A total of 15 patients had available data on intermediate or final zinc dose. Dosages were slightly increased in 10 patients, slightly decreased in 4 patients, and did not change in 1 patient.

We used Fisher's exact test for 2×2 table analysis when comparing small sample sizes. However, some data in Table 2 (statistics at 1 year follow-up), and Table 3 (presence of splenomegaly and K-F ring) might be too small to reflect true differences between groups. In the future, larger studies will be required to evaluate if these differences are truly not significant.

Long-term zinc therapy may interfere with intestinal iron absorption causing anemia in children. Although mean Hb level did not change throughout our study period, we did not routinely test serum iron levels and cannot confirm if there is any sub-clinical iron deficiency that will affect Hb levels with longer zinc therapy.

Adult and adolescent studies showed 24-hour urinary copper and non-ceruloplasmin serum copper as important indicators for evaluating the efficacy of WD treatment [13], [24], [36], [37]. These parameters might not be equally valid in pediatric patients. Mizuochi et al. [35] treated 4 pre-symptomatic children aged 5–7 years with zinc sulfate, and recommended maintaining 24-hour urinary copper excretion between 1 and 3 ug/kg/day might achieve good results in younger children. Observations of 24-hour urine copper per kilogram of body weight and serum non-ceruloplasmin copper levels were not possible in this retrospective study as we did not regularly record body weight and check non-ceruloplasmin copper levels during follow-up visits.

Conclusion

In our single center experience, zinc gluconate was effective in reducing liver enzymes and urinary copper excretion, while producing few gastrointestinal side effects which were mild and transient. The higher zinc dose achieved the same treatment outcome and caused the same rate of gastrointestinal effect when compared to the currently recommended zinc dose. Based on the data presented in this paper, we have not established a clinically significant benefit in a higher than recommended zinc dose. However, we have also demonstrated that a higher dose of zinc for induction may not be associated with a higher rate of side effects than the conventional dose. Our data suggest that the decrease in serum direct bilirubin level while remaining within the normal range might reflect improvement of liver function, and could be considered as a marker for treatment response.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Table S1 provided full follow-up data for each patient at each visit. Abbreviations were provided within the text.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our deepest gratitude towards Dr. David P. Dimmock from the Department of Pediatrics, Human and Molecular Genetic Center, and the Department of Pediatrics Genomics Medicine Clinic at Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA, for copyediting the manuscript, and making some important suggestions to improving the manuscript quality.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81070281. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Brewer GJ, Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V (1992) Wilson disease. Medicine 71: 139–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bull PC, Thomas GR, Rommens JM, Forbes JR, Cox DW (1993) The Wilson disease gene is a putative copper transporting P-type ATPase similar to the Menkes gene. Nat Genet 5: 327–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Danks DM (1995) Disorders of copper transport. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, et al.. eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, 7th edition. New York: McGraw Hill: 2211–2235. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ferenci P, Caca K, Loudianos G, Mieli-Vergani G, Tanner S, et al. (2003) Diagnosis and phenotypic classification of Wilson disease. Liver Int 23: 139–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Koppikar S, Dhawan A (2005) Evaluation of the scoring system for the diagnosis of Wilson's disease in children. Liver Int 25: 680–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Medici V, Rossaro L, Sturniolo GC (2007) Wilson disease–a practical approach to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Dig Liver Dis 39: 601–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. European Association for Study of Liver (2012) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Wilson's disease. J Hepatol 56: 671–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Roberts EA, Schilsky ML (2008) American Association for Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). Diagnosis and treatment of Wilson disease: an update. Hepatology 47: 2089–2111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hoogenraad TU (2006) Paradigm shift in treatment of Wilson's disease: zinc therapy now treatment of choice. Brain Dev 28: 141–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Brewer GJ (2001) Zinc acetate for the treatment of Wilson's disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2: 1473–1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wiggelinkhuizen M, Tilanus ME, Bollen CW, Houwen RH (2009) Systematic review: clinical efficacy of chelator agents and zinc in the initial treatment of Wilson disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 29: 947–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brewer GJ, Dick RD, Johnson VD, Brunberg JA, Kluin KJ, et al. (1998) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc: XV long-term follow-up studies. J Lab Clin Med 132: 264–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Hoogenraad TU, Van Hattum J, Van den Hamer CJ (1987) Management of Wilson's disease with zinc sulphate. Experience in a series of 27 patients. J Neurol Sci 77: 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Marcellini M, Di Ciommo V, Callea F, Devito R, Comparcola D, et al. (2005) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc from the time of diagnosis in pediatric patients: a single-hospital, 10-year follow-up study. J Lab Clin Med 145: 139–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu ZY, Lin MT, Murong SX, Wang N (2003) Molecular diagnosis and prophylactic therapy for presymptomatic Chinese patients with Wilson disease. Arch Neurol 60: 737–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Czlonkowska A, Gajda J, Rodo M (1996) Effects of long-term treatment in Wilson's disease with D-penicillamine and zinc sulphate. J Neurol 243: 269–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Medici V, Trevisan CP, D'Incà R, Barollo M, Zancan L, et al. (2006) Diagnosis and management of Wilson's disease: results of a single center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 40: 936–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hoogenraad TU, Koevoet R, de RuyterKorver EG (1979) Oral zinc sulphate as long-term treatment in Wilson's disease (hepatolenticular degeneration). Eur Neurol 18: 205–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, Grider A, Nostrant T, Cousins RJ, Brewer GJ (1992) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc: X. Intestinal metallothionein induction. J Lab Clin Med 120: 380–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee DY, Brewer GJ, Wang YX (1989) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc. VII. Protection of the liver from copper toxicity by zinc-induced metallothionein in a rat model. J Lab Clin Med 114: 639–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Goering PL, Tandon SK, Klaassen CD (1985) Induction of hepatic metallothionein in mouse liver following administration of chelating agents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 80: 467–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Brewer GJ, Hill GM, Prasad AS, Cossack ZT, Rabbani P (1983) Oral zinc therapy for Wilson's disease. Ann Intern Med 99: 314–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hoogenraad TU (1998) Zinc treatment of Wilson's disease. J Lab Clin Med 132: 240–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Brewer GJ, Dick RD, Johnson VD, Fink JK, Kluin KJ, et al. (2001) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc XVI: treatment during the pediatric years. J Lab Clin Med 137: 191–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Brewer GJ, Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, Dick R (1990) Zinc therapy of Wilson's disease VIII. Dose response studies. Trace Elem Exp Med 3: 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Mishra D, Kalra V, Seth R (2008) Failure of prophylactic zinc in Wilson disease. Indian Pediatr 45: 151–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Walshe JM, Munro NAR (1995) Zinc-induced deterioration in Wilson's disease aborted by treatment with penicillamine, dimercaprol, and a novel zero copper diet. Arch Neurol 52: 10–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lang CJG, Rabas-Kolominsky AE, Konras G, Konig HI (1933) Fatal deterioration of Wilson's disease after institution of oral zinc therapy. Arch Neurol 50: 1007–1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Castilla-Higuero L, Romero-Gomez M, Suarez E, Castro M (2000) Acute hepatitis after starting zinc therapy in a patient with presymptomatic Wilson's disease. Hepatology 32: 877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mulder TP, Janssens AR, Verpaget HW, van Hattum, Lamers CB (1992) Metallothionein concentration in the liver of patients with Wilson's disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Hepatol 16: 346–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Friedman LS (1993) Zinc in the treatment of Wilson's disease: how it works. Gastroenterology 104: 1566–1568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, Brewer GJ, Abrams GD, Main B, Giacherio D (1989) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc. V. Changes in serum levels of lipase, amylase, and alkaline phosphatase in patients with Wilson's disease. J Lab Clin Med 114: 520–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sadighi A, Roshan MM, Moradi A, Ostadrahimi A (2008) The effects of zinc supplementation on serum zinc, alkaline phosphatase activity and fracture healing of bones. Saudi Med J 29: 1276–1279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Linn FH, Houwen RH, van Hattum J, van der Kleij S, van Erpecum KJ (2009) Long-term exclusive zinc monotherapy in symptomatic Wilson disease: experience in 17 patients. Hepatology 50: 1442–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mizuochi T, Kimura A, Shimizu N, Nishiura H, Matsushita M, et al. (2011) Zinc monotherapy from time of diagnosis for young pediatric patients with presymptomatic Wilson disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 53: 365–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brewer GJ (2001) Wilson's Disease: A Clinician's Guide to Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Brewer GJ, Dick RD, Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan V, Johnson V, Wang Y (1994) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc. XIII: Therapy with zinc in presymptomatic patients from the time of diagnosis. J Lab Clin Med 123: 849–858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Table S1 provided full follow-up data for each patient at each visit. Abbreviations were provided within the text.

(XLSX)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES