Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1983 Oct;80(19):5912–5915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.19.5912

DNA fragments in Friend erythroleukemia cells induced by dimethyl sulfoxide.

V L Pulito, D L Miller, S Sassa, T Yamane
PMCID: PMC390186  PMID: 6310603

Abstract

The idea of the correlation between DNA damage caused by dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) and the induction of erythrodifferentiation in murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells needs reevaluation as a result of the hydroxyapatite chromatographic analysis of DNA from Me2SO-treated and untreated cells as a function of the time in culture. Because Me2SO causes an arrest in G1 phase and consequent delay in DNA synthesis, the valid comparison would be of the DNA samples taken from control and induced cells at the same stage of growth rather than at the same time in culture. At the same stage of growth, there is no evidence of the induction of DNA damage by Me2SO. Presumably, so-called degradation reported in the past stemmed from the fragments of DNA replication.

Full text

PDF
5912

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Durkacz B. W., Omidiji O., Gray D. A., Shall S. (ADP-ribose)n participates in DNA excision repair. Nature. 1980 Feb 7;283(5747):593–596. doi: 10.1038/283593a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Erickson L. C., Osieka R., Sharkey N. A., Kohn K. W. Measurement of DNA damage in unlabeled mammalian cells analyzed by alkaline elution and a fluorometric DNA assay. Anal Biochem. 1980 Jul 15;106(1):169–174. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farzaneh F., Zalin R., Brill D., Shall S. DNA strand breaks and ADP-ribosyl transferase activation during cell differentiation. Nature. 1982 Nov 25;300(5890):362–366. doi: 10.1038/300362a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friend C., Freedman H. A. Effects and possible mechanism of action of dimethylsulfoxide on Friend cell differentiation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1978 May 1;27(9):1309–1313. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(78)90112-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friend C., Scher W., Holland J. G., Sato T. Hemoglobin synthesis in murine virus-induced leukemic cells in vitro: stimulation of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Feb;68(2):378–382. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.2.378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gazitt Y., Reuben R. C., Deitch A. D., Marks P. A., Rifkind R. A. Changes in cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate levels during induction of differentiation in murine erythroleukemia cells. Cancer Res. 1978 Nov;38(11 Pt 1):3779–3783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Levenson R., Housman D., Cantley L. Amiloride inhibits murine erythroleukemia cell differentiation: evidence for a Ca2+ requirement for commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):5948–5952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loritz F., Bernstein A., Miller R. G. Early and late volume changes during erythroid differentiation of cultured Friend leukemic cells. J Cell Physiol. 1977 Mar;90(3):423–437. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040900306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marks P. A., Rifkind R. A. Erythroleukemic differentiation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1978;47:419–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.002223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nomura S., Oishi M. Indirect induction of erythroid differentiation in mouse Friend cells: evidence for two intracellular reactions involved in the differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jan;80(1):210–214. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.1.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Purnell M. R., Whish W. J. Novel inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase. Biochem J. 1980 Mar 1;185(3):775–777. doi: 10.1042/bj1850775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sakai K., Okada S. An alkaline separation method for detection of small amount of DNA damage. J Radiat Res. 1981 Dec;22(4):415–424. doi: 10.1269/jrr.22.415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sato T., Friend C., De Harven E. Ultrastructural changes in Friend erythroleukemia cells treated with dimethyl sulfoxide. Cancer Res. 1971 Oct;31(10):1402–1417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scher W., Friend C. Breakage of DNA and alterations in folded genomes by inducers of differentiation in Friend erythroleukemic cells. Cancer Res. 1978 Mar;38(3):841–849. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith R. L., Macara I. G., Levenson R., Housman D., Cantley L. Evidence that a Na+/Ca2+ antiport system regulates murine erythroleukemia cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jan 25;257(2):773–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Terada M., Epner E., Nudel U., Salmon J., Fibach E., Rifkind R. A., Marks P. A. Induction of murine erythroleukemia differentiation by actinomycin D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2795–2799. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Terada M., Nudel U., Fibach E., Rifkind R. A., Marks P. A. Changes in DNA associated with induction of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide in murine erythroleukemia cells. Cancer Res. 1978 Mar;38(3):835–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES